2009 Pro Bowl - AFC vs. The Washington Redskins?
by JasonDLT on Nov 21, 2008 10:58 AM CST
7 comments
In a nearly inconceivably laughable circumstance and brilliant campaigning by the Washington Redskins, 20 members of the 6-4 Washington Redskins are leading in fan voting for their respective positions for the Pro Bowl. The Redskins have had an aggressive Obama-styled get out the vote campaign that has led to the Redskins leading the NFC ballots in 16 of 19 positions, eight of the 11 NFC starters on both offense and defense would be Redskins, plus all four special teams players. Shawn Springs who has missed six games with injuries, is the leading vote-getter at cornerback...continued here
This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
Go to NFL.com to see results and Vote!
by vikingfuture8816 on Nov 21, 2008 1:57 PM CST reply actions
The ironic thing about this is, they don’t even have the best record right now. Aren’t something like 6-4? Now if 8 out of 11 positions on the NFC team belonged to the Giants, I would understand that. But the Redskins? Come on now. What gives? They must have some fan who’s just been voting like thousands of times or something.
Try living down here....
If that isn’t absurd enough, try living down here in Va. where the local media tries to shove the Redskins down your throat 24-7, 365 days a year….
It's
a bot. some one, or some ones have programed a redskins voting bot, and let it loose. no way to compeat with that. the system needs to be fixed.
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Daily Norseman
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
