Official Falcons/Vikings Injury Reports
Alrighty, folks. . .got back late from our funeral detail today, so I'm just now getting the chance to put these things up here. When my 3-month rotation is done (and before my next 3-month rotation starts), I'll have to do a bit of off-topic work here about the honor guard experience, because it really is something cool.
And, hey, by that time, it'll be March. . .or, as I call it, "we're not quite to the draft so Gonzo is reaching for material" time.
So, since the Falcons are the guests of the Beloved Purple this weekend, we'll start out by taking a look at their injuries first.

Comparing this to the NFL.com injury reports (as I always do), all of the players listed on Atlanta's injury report are shown as having limited participation in Friday's practice. Don't even worry about John Abraham. . .he'll be out on the field. Much like Jared Allen, there's no way Abraham is going to miss a game like this where there's so much on the line.
Sam Baker, the promising young rookie tackle, missed seven straight games before returning last week against Tampa. If he can't go, Quinn Ojinnaka will start in his place. In either case, I'd expect the Falcons to have a lot of help for their LT against big #69. Finneran is way down on the depth chart, so I'm not sure he'll even be active for this one (NFL.com's depth chart for the Falcons shows 5 WR at 2 different spots, and none of them are named Brian Finneran). Grady Jackson hasn't missed a game all year, and with All Day and All Night lining up in the Minnesota backfield, I'd be willing to wager that he won't miss this one, either.
On to the Vikings' injuries:
Pat Williams isn't shown on the injury report, but we all know he's out until the post-season, and we've already discussed the injury at length. I think it's a big injury for the Vikings, but it's also something that they can overcome. Anyone that thinks that the Falcons are going to come into the Dome and put up 200+ yards rushing just because big #94 isn't in the middle is in for a bit of a rude awakening, I think.
Hicks and Reynaud didn't participate at all in Friday's practice, and neither of them are going to be "up" on Sunday afternoon. Jared Allen and Adrian Peterson? Yeah, like they're going to miss this game. Robison had full participation in Friday's practice, and it's going to be interesting to see how he gets used this week. He's been coming in for Phat Pat a lot on passing downs thus far as it is, but with Williams being out and the Falcons (likely) throwing the ball a lot on Sunday, I think we're going to see a lot of field time for Robison.
Apparently Gus Frerotte is a bit miffed about losing his starting job, even though he claims to be 100%. First of all, there's no way in hell that Gus is 100% already. He's an almost 40-year old man with a back injury. No way that thing healed up in less than two weeks. Second, I'm not sure if Gus recalls this or not, but he was one half of football away from the Detroit Lions moving from 0-12 to 1-12 at our expense again. Again, let me remind everybody. . .the Lions have 4 interceptions this season through 14 games. Take out Gus Frerotte's contributions, and that number drops from 4 to 1.
Yes, I know that guys aren't supposed to lose their jobs because of injuries and all that. Well, guys also aren't supposed to lose their jobs after a game where they throw four touchdown passes, either. So, I guess it all evens out.
And those are the injuries that could have an effect on this Sunday's game. More on the game tomorrow. . .until then, keep enjoying your weekend, and if your Christmas travels begin over the weekend, stay safe out there, especially in the Upper Midwest where the weather is already turning crappy, by all accounts.
Comments
I've said it before
Gus 100% would be my pick to start. Although I’m taking nothing from the kid.
Either or, it’s going to be one to remember and an important one on that note.
See you guys on the thread, or possible tomorrow.
by vikingfiend on
Dec 19, 2008 10:26 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Losing Starting Job To Injury
I think that not losing your starting job due to injury is a bunch of BS, especially if the backup is playing well. The Chiefs proved that years ago by starting Grbac in a playoff game against the Broncos over Rich Gannon. They ended up losing a game they should have won at home, and the Broncos went on to win the Super Bowl.
Jackson has the hot hand, so leave him in. Frerotte had been throwing too many INT"s for my tastes anyway.
The Minnesota Vikings - Undefeated in the Playoffs at Lambeau Field!
by BaldViking on
Dec 20, 2008 6:36 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Not to mention the inability to avoid a sack, especially, for some reason, the drive killing sack.
by cheaptoy on
Dec 20, 2008 10:09 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You Mean...
the " I could have thrown the ball away to keep from losing yardage on a sack " sack?
by purplegrey on
Dec 21, 2008 5:07 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Exactly
Nothing against Gus but the team was actually winning most of its games despite him not because of him as his immobility, inaccurate throws on the slants and screens, and most importantly picks killed us in the losses and nearly killed us in some of the wins. I was one of the few who never thought Jackson should have been replaced in the first place.
by VikingBillArlingtonVA on
Dec 20, 2008 1:58 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Haha
Todd Weiner’s knee is questionable. That will be the achilles heel of this game for the Falcons.
by Viking Frog on
Dec 21, 2008 12:01 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Last meaningful game of the regular season
ATL is one of a handful of teams that could punish most teams with their running game, and maybe even the Vikings without Pat Williams. (In hindsight, it would have been better to serve a 4-game suspension and return healthy for the playoffs, but nobody can blame him for appealing, of course.) Although the Vikiings own the yards per rush/pass/play stats, the Falcons have allowed fewer points despite playing a tougher schedule. Atlanta has allowed the fewest first downs by penalty in the NFL so far.
It’s not so much a question of whether Tarvaris Jackson should have lost his job or not because Childress insured it was moot by bringing in Gus Frerotte and Kelly Holcomb rather than Tyler Thigpen. We should have had the good kind of QB quandary on our hands in 2007-2008, and it could have been sorted out before this season started. Instead, Childress valued Kelly Holcomb’s invisible potential and/or leadership over Tyler Thigpen, then Frerotte’s intangibles over Holcomb’s. Thigpen is performing better than Holcomb last year or Frerotte this year on a far worse team. Frerotte was bad enough to lose the job as a veteran who should have known and thrown better, but let’s not kid ourselves into thinking that TJ has always been a good enough answer. His rating was below 70 in the first two games of 2008 and just barely 70 in 2007. Both Holcomb and Frerotte were rated higher than that when they played (and so was Bollinger, for that matter). TJ has finally been good for a game and a half, and we STILL won’t know whether he’s the right QB to start in 2009 until the playoffs (see also: Rex Grossman, Trent Dilfer, Tony Banks).
by KC Viking on
Dec 21, 2008 12:21 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
















