QB or New QB. . .That Is the Question
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
With a quarterback that has experience
But can't move in the pocket to save his life
Or change despite a sea of doubters
And possibly silence them? To win, to learn
If we have our quarterback of the future
Or if we need to dream of next season.
Man, if Shakespeare was alive, he would so totally be stomping a mudhole in me right now. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if Kenneth Branagh showed up on my front doorstep tomorrow.
But after the events that transpired yesterday in Detroit, we may actually have a full-on quarterback controversy here in Minnesota. Yes, since the Vikings made the change from Tarvaris Jackson to Gus Frerotte at quarterback, they've won 8 out of 11 games, counting yesterday's 20-16 nail-biter. (And I'll count it because, yes, Gus did start, even though he made absolutely no positive contribution towards said victory.)
However, after injuring his back towards the end of the first half of play, we saw Tarvaris Jackson take a meaningful snap in an NFL game for the first time since the contest against Indianapolis in Week 2. And while Viking nation held their collective breath for a few moments, the kid came into the game in the third quarter and performed very, very well. He finished the game having gone 8/10 for 105 yards and a touchdown in one half of play, with the touchdown coming on a brilliant play fake/roll out to Visanthe Shiancoe in the fourth quarter to give the Vikings a lead they wouldn't relinquish.
The Lions' defense looked thoroughly unprepared for a Jackson appearance, granted. But on the same field where, a year ago, he threw four interceptions and left the game injured in a 20-17 overtime loss, we saw a totally different quarterback than we saw then, and even a different quarterback than we saw in the first two games of this regular season. Jackson was calm. . .he was poised. . .he stood in the face of the rush and didn't get rattled, even after his first pass was nearly intercepted on a play where he got hit as he threw. He read the defense he was presented quite well, and threw the ball with accuracy when he decided where he wanted to go with it.
Yesterday, Tarvaris Jackson played a huge role in a game that was vital to the Vikings post-season chances. . .and looked damn good in doing so. He looked like the quarterback we saw against Denver in the final game of 2007. He looked like the kind of quarterback that might actually have a future with this team after all.
And, as I said in the game thread, I don't want to hear how this was "just the Lions." In six quarters against the Vikings this season, the Detroit defense pretty much handed Gus Frerotte his ass at every opportunity. They sacked him five times in the game at the Metrodome, and they forced him into two interceptions yesterday, both of which fell into the "ugly" category. In fact, the Detroit defense has intercepted four passes this season. . .ALL season. . .in 13 games. Three of those four interceptions have come from the right hand of Gus Frerotte, and his injury came trying to tackle a defensive lineman on the last one.
Yes, the Vikings are 8-3 with Gus Frerotte as their starting quarterback. This team has, however, won a couple of games despite Gus Frerotte and not because of him (the Green Bay game at the Dome springs to mind, as does yesterday's contest). And hey, Tarvaris Jackson was 8-4 as Minnesota's starting quarterback in 2007.
If we're being honest, I'm not sure if Jackson ever should have been benched to start with. . .and I'm not sure if Gus Frerotte has really given us anything to this point in the season that Tarvaris Jackson couldn't have given us. I mean, Gus is a veteran that's seen pretty much every defense known to man, and he still makes plenty of dumb throws and has had plenty of dumb interceptions this season. Plus, pigeons tend to try to land on him when he drops back to pass.
The difference is that we know what Gus Frerotte's ceiling is. We know what Gus can do. We know what Gus is capable of. Despite what many people will tell you, we don't have that same knowledge about Tarvaris Jackson. Anyone that says they do is a liar. The guy's made 16 career NFL starts. In those 16 starts, he has a record of exactly .500. The Vikings have won eight games that he's started at quarterback, and they've lost eight games that he's started at quarterback. He's had various amounts to "do" with each of those victories and each of those losses. Can he be this team's quarterback of the future?
Again. . .we don't know.
But, I think the Vikings owe it to themselves to find out.
0 recs |
69 comments
|
Comments
Jeepers???
Why not???
Why not T-Jack? He spent…what….11..12 weeks on the bench watching, learning, hopefully soaking it all in. There is no doubt he has the athletic ability. But it seemed his brain couldn’t process the info from snap to whistle fast enough. Maybe taking a step back slows it all down for him.
I dont know what to do. Lets roll with him for one week while Gus is on the mend. Then we will know for sure.
by RileysCannibalJct on Dec 8, 2008 8:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I never wanted to bench Jackson
in the first place. Hell, Bevell and Chili were only letting him play with half of the KAO’s playbook and Shiancoe was dropping everything (Shiancoe is now the Vikings best and most dependable receiver). The first two losses can hardly be attributed to him alone.
Had Frerotte not been injured y’day the Vikings would have lost that game. Guaranteed. He was simply awful. Jackson played a flawless half of football. Gus is what he is a 52% lifetime completion guy with a penchant for the pick and immobile to boot. Jackson brings much more to the table and should be the starting qb the rest of the way.
by VikingBillArlingtonVA on Dec 8, 2008 8:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
And than probably Sidney Rice...
Bobby Wade is a great catcher, but he seems so weak…
*Mac45*
by Macdaddy4508 on Dec 8, 2008 10:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Same goes for Tavaris...
everyone says we won despite of Gus, but I still say Jackson didn’t contribute much to his 8-4 record in 2007.
I also disagree with the fact that he didn’t have enough time to prove himself. He had plenty of time.
by vikingfiend on Dec 8, 2008 8:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sixteen games is plenty of time? One whole season? Really? I would like you to point me to a QB who comes in and sets the league on fire in 16 games. Okay, okay. Matt Ryan is doing well, and so did Big Ben, but that’s really all that comes to mind. Two QBs out of how many being in the NFL?
by Frost on Dec 9, 2008 8:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Same goes for Tavaris...
vikingfiend -
No one. No one expected Tavaris to come out of the gates in his rookie year and make the pro bowl. It’s called development and towards the end of last season he showed improvement. All offseason Chilie said he showed improvement and was farther along than McNabb at this point in their respective DEVELOPMENTS. This year he has thrown ONE interception in 2.5 games. In fact after he lost two close games to GB and INDY (last years conference championship teams) Chilie pulled him saying he was not aggressive enough. To me that says he learned the leasson from the previous season when it was drilled into him that we wanted a game manager. Well it seems to me he has learned another lesson having been benched all these weeks because he was decisive and accurate against Detroit.
The difference is Gus has been in this league forever and we KNOW exactly what we ave in him. Last year in St. Louis he had more INT than TD and he is on the same path this year if he can even get his body to cooperate.
vikingfiend Tavaris has been developing and has shown constant improvement. With Gus the bar is sooo freakin low there is no way TJ can do worse. Again TJ has thrown ONE pick (and if Vicante catches that TD vs Indy he is 2-1 with 3 TD and 1 INT). TJ has done NOTHING this year to suggest he worse than Gus who has been completely awful and terrible to watch. To not get behind TJ at this point is purely moronic.
http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff222/LeoGetz25_2007/Peterson28-1.png
by aceinthecorner on Dec 8, 2008 8:55 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Not Quite....
Someone’s not moronic just b/c they disagree with you.
I was completely against benching TJ. I was behind him 100%. However, our record is what it is. And under Gus we’ve won. I’m just hesitant to change it up b/c of one half of solid play by my man TJ.
by JasonAve6413 on Dec 8, 2008 9:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The record means next to
nothing. The team’s often won in spite of Frerotte’s performance not because of it. Everyone remembers the 99 yd. strike to Berrian (the result of a blown coverage) against the Bears and forgets his wretched performance up until that moment and his ints. were a big reason the Vikings lost the first Bears game.
But it’s all academic anyway since Chili’s already announced that when he’s healthy the job is his. It will stay that way until Chili once again tries to save his ass by going to TJ and that will happen soon enough. See those touch throws Jackson made right on the money? Frerotte’s accuracy has been godawful all year constantly turning guys around especially on vital swings and screens to keep drives alive.
by VikingBillArlingtonVA on Dec 8, 2008 9:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hmm, it’s not moronic because he disagrees with me, it’s moronic because Gus is inaccurate, immobile, makes poor decision after poor decision, and because his body is broken down while Jackson has shown signs of improvement and done nothing this year to suggest he is worse than Gus. It is moronix because Gus formula of throwing 3 picks and taking 6 sacks isn’t going to win in the playoffs, no chance in hell. At least with Jackson there is hope that he has put the pieces together.
Everyone hating on Jackson ignores his record last year sighting his play, but sticks up for Gus’ record, what the hell is that? Gus has been horrible in the games we have won with him.
http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff222/LeoGetz25_2007/Peterson28-1.png
by aceinthecorner on Dec 8, 2008 9:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Records Aside
You would pick T-Jack 10 out of 10 times!
As a starter, Frerotte has made two plays Jackson might not have been able to make. I don’t want to criticize him in any way, but Frerotte’s play is limiting the Vikings as much or more than Jackson’s ever had.
What is wrong with Childress that he can’t see what his lying eyes are showing him?
by LoveHate on Dec 8, 2008 9:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Here’s the way I see it. Like Gonzo and others have said, most of the time we’re winning in spite of Frerotte rather than because of Frerotte. Now, that happens to be the same way I saw Jackson’s tenure as starter as well. But now we’re in a different position. This is the perfect opportunity to see what Jackson is really made of and see if he has a future with the Vikings (and the NFL for that matter). If he can’t get it done now, he probably never will.
It’s actually hard to distinguish the overall numbers between the two guys. So now you go with the healthy and athletic guy instead of t he guy who has started about 5 games more than he was fit to at his age.
Let’s be honest, if we make the playoffs it’s unlikely that we can win more than one game anyway. This is all about the future. It’s more about the draft next April than the Super Bowl this January if you ask me.
by Bodysuit Man on Dec 8, 2008 9:15 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Start Jackson … if he wins and has learned then we have something. If he fails then we know what we have to do next year 100% and you go back to Gus having given the tired, battered, old man a rest and we lose eventually in the playoffs because Gus sucks unless our defense and AD bail him …again.
The stage is perfectly set for Jackson and I wish him all the best.
http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff222/LeoGetz25_2007/Peterson28-1.png
by aceinthecorner on Dec 8, 2008 9:19 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Well you can forget about the draft
qb-wise because there isn’t one guy in it who can start in the NFL. Worst senior class overall in ages in fact.
If Chili doesn’t exhibit faith in TJ now what’s he gonna do next year bring in another overpaid guy at the end of his career like Donovan McNabb?
I like Gus Frerotte. He’s a great guy and played decently in spurts his entire career but he wore out his welcome here in DC not just for the infamous “wall headbutt” against the Giants but because of his horribly inconsistent play (and this was when he was in his mid 20s).
by VikingBillArlingtonVA on Dec 8, 2008 9:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
For Real??
No good QBs in the draft? I’d take Graham Harrell any day, particularly with a team that has a good O-line for him to sit behind.
by cutlassbob on Dec 8, 2008 10:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
NO WAY! The best QB is the one going 1st pick to the Lions...
Sam Bradford! Look at his stats… OMG! Dude is the next matt ryan!
*Mac45*
by Macdaddy4508 on Dec 8, 2008 10:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sam Bradford isn't a SENIOR
VikingBill referenced the senior class for QBs. Colt McCoy has already said he is going to return for his senior year (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3754860) and Bradford is a sophomore (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=188934). So, obviously neither McCoy or Bradford would need to declare for the draft.
by cutlassbob on Dec 9, 2008 12:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No hes not
but he is a red shirt sophomore, which makes him eligible to go into the draft!
by JRockItsAllGood on Dec 9, 2008 10:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
True But
if he doesn’t win a championship with Oklahoma this year he might have more incentive to stay in college, and vice versa.
by cutlassbob on Dec 9, 2008 1:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Well you can forget about the draft
"I like Gus Frerotte. He’s a great guy " I will gladly fish with the man but in his prime he was average at best (a decade of stats speak to that), but seriously the last two years as a full time QB he has been far below average, and his body is quitting on him.
As to next year … the time is now and we are here. Jackson should be our guy NOW. If Jackson fails then perhaps one looks to Garcia or Cassel and grooms Booty. But again it’s Jacksons’ time now and we should get behind him. I like Jackson, he’s a good guy too.
http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff222/LeoGetz25_2007/Peterson28-1.png
by aceinthecorner on Dec 8, 2008 9:25 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Only in Vikingsland
Its maddening to follow a team whose fan base is always more in tune with the personnel and playbook than the coaches are.
The Vikings need to play T-Jack now for the betterment of the team and playoff aspirations.
by LoveHate on Dec 8, 2008 9:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
TJ is the big unknown
Gonzo hit it on the head, we know what Gus can do, but not TJ. He has talent, and natural ability, but is Chilly capable of developing him?
Things that stuck out from TJ’s game:
1 – He had 3-4 dump off passes which were nearly guarenteed to be caught. This says two things. One, his numbers may be a bit inflated considering the level of difficulty he ultimately faced. Two, Chilly still doesn’t trust the kid.
2 – The higher difficulty passes that he made were amazing. He’s got that cannon for an arm, which is good for 15 yard passes, and horrid for 5 yard passes. What is of note is that in his previous experience, he gunned everything at the same speed. Against the Lions he used the appropriate amount of force for the situation. His short dump off passes were catchable, his mid range passes were bullets placed with precision accuracy.
3 – What would normally be a sack for Gus turned into a longer and eventually more productive play under TJ. He’s mobile.
4 – He did throw a TJ type pass all game. Remember last year in the December game against the Bears when TJ tossed up a 15 yard jump ball on 2nd down in to the heart of the Bears defense? Then the next week he did it again? He did not make one of those absolutley stupid mistakes this game. Has he gained a touch of maturity?
I’ll admit that I wanted TJ benched after last years debacles. I changed my tune earlier this year after realizing it was Chilly’s fault for the poor passing game. Gus is not the answer. If we head into the playoffs with Gus, we may stumble past one round if we are lucky. We will not get past two rounds. With Tj, chances are probably equal that we will not get very far, but it is not as much of a certainty. Basically it comes down to two options:
Know your going to lose, or know your probably going to lose (but there is that outside shot of magic). The difference is Gus has no magic, TJ might.
Skol to TJ
Ps My worst fear is that we have some kind of crazy playoff luck (like the kind we have had all year) and actually make the Super Bowl. We would never get Chilly out of here.
Skol Vikings
Mr. Weatherstone
by Mr. Weatherstone on Dec 8, 2008 9:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Gotta disagree on one point
If Brad Childress gets the Minnesota Vikings a Super Bowl ring, he can coach here as long as he damn well pleases.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
by Gonzo on Dec 8, 2008 9:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No doubt!!!
I like what Chilly has done with the Team. Everyone jumped on TJ and Chilly and now they’re all on T-Jacks nutsack! What Coach doesn’t take some heat! Almost 19-0 Patriots took some heat! Bill Belichick ‘Cheated’!!! If we win our division and make the playoffs how couldn’t you say our coach did a good job?
*Mac45*
by Macdaddy4508 on Dec 8, 2008 11:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Luck
How many games this year should we realistically have lost? As Vikings fans we have to admit to ourselves that this year the ball actually is bouncing our direction and it has nothing to do with game management. There have been years in which we were a very good team and earned our wins . . . and then there is this year in which karma finally decides to catch up to us and grant us some wins we did not deserve. In reality we should be fighting with Green Bay for 3rd place.
Mr. Weatherstone
by Mr. Weatherstone on Dec 8, 2008 11:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Right, because I’m very sure that luck had nothing to do with any of GBs wins either. Or Chicago’s. Or any other team’s. It’s a factor, for sure, but you can’t just say “Oh, we’re only winning because we’re lucky, Chilly still sucks” because he’s put us in this position to be winning, lucky or not.
by Frost on Dec 9, 2008 8:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, really Gonzo?
Believe me,
The only way Brad Childress will be responsible for getting the ring all the players deserve is if the almighty hand of Odin himself reaches down and shoves his hammer up his arse. I haven’t been this frustrated in the coaching staff since the Les Steckel years. We have had such a generic, show-and-tell offense all year long. 1st down Adrian run, 2nd down Adrian run, 3rd down short pass to Taylor. How may times have we seen that. I understand that this was Jackson’s first full season, but the coaches could have done a better job at designing plays. I don’t blam him for all his woes. What happened to the screen pass? Peterson in the open field is one of tthe biggest threats in the NFL. Let’s be a little creative guys. The players may like Childress, but until he shows the fire, the passion, the bow-legged hopping as he struggles to pull Odin’s hammer out of his arse, I will continue to call for his head and hope that Bill Cowher is within earshot.
Just my two cents.
"Skol pa fiskande"
by NobleSavage on Dec 9, 2008 1:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would agree with that
but honestly, what are the chances? I wonder if he could do it with a Manning or Brady as QB on this team knowing what a lousy offensive mind he has and how he is routinely scared to take a chance. I mean more than one chance per game.
But if he wins a Super Bowl he’s golden in my book. Those rings are hard to come by and even some great coaches will never get one. Winning a SB is the whole point of this thing right?
by Bodysuit Man on Dec 9, 2008 2:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"He had 3-4 dump off passes which were nearly guarenteed to be caught."
Dude, those little swings and screens are very difficult to throw so the receiver can catch the ball in stride without either turning or reaching up. Frerotte’s been absolutely horrendous on these most of the year and Jackson’s throws Sunday were letter perfect allowing for crucial pickups. In the past Jackson had been worse on these then on the deeper throws where his strong arm (stronger than Frerotte’s) can carry him.
by VikingBillArlingtonVA on Dec 9, 2008 8:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
“Start Jackson….if he wins and has learned then we have something”.
You say “if” a lot in your comments. What “IF” T-Jack f’s up our future for the divison and playoff hope. Don’t forget the Bears are a game behind us and ready to take first place.
You also keep mentioning next year. What about the fact that we are close this year? What about now? We don’t need superstars to get to the playoffs or superbowl! We don’t have to wait for the McNabbs or the Cassels when we are on the verge right now in this season to win the north.
If Jackson goes in, and somehow doesn’t make playoffs, I’m most certain he’ll be the most hated player on the Vikings. Especially seeing that we can make it now with the old man.
I like Jackson and I want him to start in the long run, but only when everyone is confident in him. Childress needs to trust this young man and if he doesn’t let Tarvaris take control he’s killing the poor kid. Also, if Gus can’t make it this week, go with Tarvaris and you will see me on the game thread behind him all the way.
But, why change something when we have it good? Meaning record. Again, if T-Jack starts and holds his own against the Cards (not AD or CT or Longwell) then I will shut up about starting T-Jack.
It’s not moronic, it’s the truth. And right now Gus is the first place QB!
by vikingfiend on Dec 8, 2008 10:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wow Gonzo, what would that look like if Brad FN Childress has a superbowl ring?
None of us, in our wildest dreams would have guessed that!
by vikingfiend on Dec 8, 2008 10:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Childress is PROBLEM
Jackson was never been given full access to playbook. Even as of the past game, nickel and dime offense while he was in there… Yes he missed on deep pass, what QB hasn’t ? He has physical tools and may or may not have mental capabilities, but at least open playbook and allow him chance to make plays…Play calling ever since Childress has been here has been terrible most of time…Before we threw the 99 yd TD pass I was screaming…THROW THE DAMN BALL THIS TIME…No matter who we have at QB, until we become unpredictable and keep playbook open and opponets defense guessing our offense will be average at best and that is a shame with the talent we have with Peterson…
by WVVikings on Dec 9, 2008 1:39 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
i didnt want T-Jack to be benched either but.........
Gus will start next game if hes healthy. the reason is he is more game ready and has taken the vast majority of starts this season. dont get me wrong i want to see t jack in as much as the next guy and i think if he stayed in he would have developed into a way better qb but the fact is he was not only benched but he was taking limited snaps during practice. i know t jack is better then gus, but t jack wasent doing enough to win even tho he wasent making bad mistakes like gus. gus was making terrible mistakes but he was also making his throws which gave the vikings a few key victories. would t jack be making those throws in that game vs carolina ? we will never know but i think at some point in the season he would have. its just the worst timing possible to show you can make those throws cuz the bears are still one game back and even if they lose on Thursday the vikings are not completely out of a first round bye if they run the table which seems very possible. what if the bears lose on thursday which i think they will? is it worth the risk to start him, i think it is. i HATE THIS but i think we let the bears make this decision for us.
by Canadian_viking on Dec 9, 2008 4:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
http://www.dailynorseman.com/2008/11/25/670534/bears-vs-vikings-the-throw#10272214
I think it’s hilarious, the amount of crap I’ve taken being a TJack supporter in the past – and now the tide seems to be turning.
I think there are two points that still have to be assured for TJack to be as steady and productive as he was in Detroit:
- The offensive line has to protect the QB more. We’ve basically hung out QBs out to dry over the past two seasons, giving up a huge number of sacks (I don’t have the number but it’s over 30 per season, I believe). If Peyton Manning was our QB, he would be playing just as terrible because he would be running for his life just like Tarvaris or Gus.
- Keep it simple. It seems to me that TJack can really shine when he’s forced to use his wheels. If Childress decides to start incorporating more playaction type plays, it might free up Berrian on long routes (since you’re basically forcing the defense to cover Adrian & TJack & even Shiancoe).
by AustinVike on Dec 9, 2008 6:58 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
What about T-Gus?
I do think T-Jack would be less effective if opponents knew he would be starting. They would game plan differently, and take away the things he likes to do (rollouts, short slants, swing passes to RBs).
I also think the single biggest asset Gus brings to the table is the ability to throw the deep ball, which, specifically makes Berrian more valuable and dangerous.
I do agree that Gus seems to be fading, and can look AWFUL (and I mean T-Jack awful) at times. Clearly, neither one is an ideal choice. Which is why I can’t help but consider the possibility of playing both guys a little bit, adjusting the playing time as dictated by the opponent and the flow of the game.
Give Gus the start. If things are going well, leave him in there. But if he’s struggling, if his accuracy is off as it has been, if he throws his typical “gift” interception, why not give T-Jack a series or two?
If nothing else, it will keep opponents guessing.
I know, I know… Some of you are saying “if you have two quarterbacks, then you really don’t have any”. Well, true enough. Just thinking about ways to get the most out of what we have, as well as to inform our quarterback decision for next year and beyond.
by mavikesfan on Dec 9, 2008 7:14 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I’m pretty sure the Cardinals tried this last year with Warner and Linehart. Warner very much outclasses out current QBs, and….. it failed. They won a single game this way, but I don’t think it could be attributed to it, and then they lose the next couple and stopped doing it.
by Frost on Dec 9, 2008 8:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, we don't have a two-time MVP
I understand what you are saying, Frost. it is against my common-sense instinct to propose using two quarterbacks. But I believe that the Cardinals case is different. They wanted to play Linehart ( a highly paid top draft pick) but knew that had a better option in Warner. I don’t think we can say with certainty that Gus is a better option.
by mavikesfan on Dec 9, 2008 8:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Jackson should start
Gus needs a break to rest his mind and body. The Vikings are going to try to run against the Cardinals and AZ is going to throw for 400 yds, because they have no running game. Hightower is good, but not good enough to battle our d-line. It may turn out that Minny will have to throw the ball a lot to keep up, but we have to see what TJ can do before we head into free agency and the April draft.
by DBQViking on Dec 9, 2008 8:38 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Well, everything has pretty much been said, so I'll just say
That I’m in the Tjack club. I was against his benching after two games, then I started to think maybe, just maybe, switching to Gus was a good move. Well, we’ll never know how Tjack would have done then, but I believe we should start him again now. Like others have said, we know what we have with Gus. Tjack an unknown, we don’t know how well he could possibly do. I say we take the chance. It wouldn’t take much to be better than Gus anyways, especially if he really has learned to put some touch on his passes and be poised in the pocket.
In AP I trust
by FarvaForTheVikings on Dec 9, 2008 9:33 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
You are the man Gonzo...
And so is Tarvaris. Even Brad Childress will not hold him back forever…
by ScottyV on Dec 9, 2008 10:40 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This is insane.
I can’t believe how many people are ready to throw Gus Frerotte under the bus after Tarvaris has had one good half of football.
You all are entitled to your opinions and I’m not looking for a fight. Hell, I WANT Tarvaris to be the next great Vikings’ QB, but many of you were yelling for Tarvaris to be benched over the course of his tenure as the Vikings’ starter. When he was, everyone cheered. When Frerotte won a few games, everyone cheered harder.
I am merely surprised by the huge knee jerk reaction of the collective Vikings fandom. I knew this would happen to a certain extent, but I’m keeping my skepticism until Tarvaris actually proves something to me. And really, in my opinion, a playoff push is not the time to be testing him unless it’s necessary and Gus is hurt.
Again, only my opinion.
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Dec 9, 2008 11:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Gus is Go Pending Severity of Injury, Bottom Line!
Gus is a statue, and teams are really getting good at making INT.s off his telegraphed throws. He still does have a better deep ball and the play calling with him is more open(why don’t we open up the playcalling with TJ? Well he’d turn into a Pro Bowler and we don’t want that, jk,lol). I really don’t think TJ will start Sun. but if he does I would be dumbfounded to actually see him connect for more than 2 passes over 15 yards. I’m not gonna lie, the running game did look better with TJ and the swing passes in the flats caught the Lions off guard. Hopefully TJ won’t sike himself out mentally if coach plans on givin’ him the start. TJ needs to relax and play or sit the bench because even if Gus doesn’t get injured again, if he starts throwing INT.s, why not put TJ in to skrew up the opposing Defense’s containment/pass rush?! Gus still get’s start this Sun. though!
by solafide on Dec 9, 2008 11:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe a lot of us felt TJ should never have lost the job and finally have a legitmate chance of geting it back. I am not throwing Gus under the bus this week, I have wanted TJ back since they unfairly blamed him for the bad play calling.
I do find that TJ showed he has improved his touch on the shorter passes in the Detroit game.
by Nefarien on Dec 9, 2008 3:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I certainly agree...
I can certainly agree that a very few people never wanted to see Tarvaris lose his starting job. I was a little on the fence and thought Childress was mostly to blame. Frerotte, however, made me wonder whether or not it was Jackson who was causing problems. We all know Childress has some play calling issues, but he’s improved, and I have no doubt Tarvaris has improved as well. I’m just not so gung-ho on benching a proven winner this year in favor of a person who has had his chance and for the most part blew it.
Is it fair? I don’t know. But what I think doesn’t matter anyway.
I just think, for now anyway, if Gus is healthy, he gets the start. We’re in the middle of a playoff run, and I see no reason to start tinkering with the formula that’s gotten us eight wins after losing the first two.
And yes, Tarvaris looked better in the Detroit game. But you can’t judge him as the starter based on 30 minutes of football. You have to take into account last year and the first two games this year. Honestly, it’s not that impressive.
Again, I reiterate that I really want Tarvaris to be the Vikings’ QB of the future. I really do. But is now the time to test that out? I really don’t think so. Whatever the circumstance, the one thing we all can hope for is a Viking win and a playoff appearance.
Sure would be nice to have that NFC North Championship hat, wouldn’t it?
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Dec 9, 2008 4:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why judge him based on his previous performances? He may have improved. Do you judge Peyton Manning based on how he performed his rookie season and say he sucked? Fact is, Jackson came in and played well. And if he can do that consistently from this point forward, then nobody should be saying “Well, yeah, but he sucked in his first 16 games.”
by Frost on Dec 10, 2008 8:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What else do you have to judge him by?
He played well in one half of football. And you know what? Peyton did suck. But he was new. Jackson has been in league awhile now. He’s had plenty of chances to show he can be a legitimate starting NFL quarterback, and while we’ve seen flashes, I personally haven’t been shown enough to hand him the starting job back after 30 minutes of good football.
How can you possibly say judging on past performance is something to be frowned upon? Would you take Cedric Benson right now? How about former Packers defensive end KJG? He’s not signed to anyone (that I’m aware of). How about recently released Bengals defensive end Josh Mallard? Ever heard of him? He’s also available. Since we’re not judging people by their past performance, any of them would be great additions to the team so we can “see how they do.” That’s just silly! You don’t draft based on random selections; you base it off of their college careers and potential for the NFL.
Do you think Brad Childress randomly selected Jackson for his QB in the second round? No. He thought he saw potential. Is it there? Who knows. What we’ve seen so far is some mediocre to sub par play peppered with some good flashes of great talent.
I’m not sold on handing him the job, and saying to not judge him by his past body of work is simply strange to me. You get jobs based on your past experience, don’t you? How is it different for the NFL?
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Dec 10, 2008 8:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This shocks me as well!
Same goes for Chilly, now everyone loves him now too. A week ago, they wanted him out.
by vikingfiend on Dec 9, 2008 3:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He should still be fired
Realistically he will not win us a SB so he needs to be fired the day after we are knocked out of the playoffs.
by Nefarien on Dec 9, 2008 3:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Both could be functional quarterbacks
Let’s be honest. Neither Gus nor Tarvaris are stars, but both could be good enough. The issue still is play calling. We saw it again in Detroit like we do most games. The Lions were over- pursuing to pressure the quarterback. In such a scenario, most coaches would call some screen passes to exploit this gap in the defense and make the other team keep some people back. Not the Vikings. Conventional wisdom does not apply to them I guess.
As far a strengths and weaknesses of each goes, arm strength is a draw, mobility Jackson is a clear winner, composure under pressure Gus is the winner, passing accuracy give it to Gus.
by keomr on Dec 9, 2008 1:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Do all of you have amnesia?!
Let’s go back to Week 2, shall we? Nearly every single one of us wanted T-Jax benched. Don’t lie. He looked terrible, the offense looked terrible, the team looked more or less terrible. Just because Jackson played one good half against ONE OF THE WORST DEFENSES EVER, THAT HADN’T EVEN GAME PLANNED FOR HIM, doesn’t make him our savior. Unless Tarvaris really has exponentially increased his football IQ, he’s still going to be the same guy that oh-so-predictably rolls out, looks to rush too early, and can’t throw a deep ball to save his life (which would in turn negate the threat of Berrian we’ve enjoyed so much this season).
The real problem here is that the Vikings have is that we have not one but two very serviceable backup quarterbacks. We’ve had the problem all year. People like AD, Allen, and the Williams Wall do a great job of masking it, but that’s the truth. Both QBs can come in for a game or two and perform, but unfortunately we can’t realistically expect either of them to carry a playoff team.
It really is true—the most popular person in town is always the backup QB.
by ericj69 on Dec 9, 2008 1:59 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I couldn't have said it better myself
Neither one appears to be the long term answer, though either can play well for a two or three game stretch. That’s pretty maddening when you’re in a close race to make the playoffs. But it’s all we’ve got thanks to Childress.
But at this point all we can talk about is a three game stretch to win the division and make the playoffs for the first time since 2004. There is no good answer here. Our only hope is that whichever QB takes the field plays far above what we’ve seen from them or at least doesn’t shoot us in the foot when our running game and defense keeps us in the game.
I don’t think it really matters which one starts since they are both similarly ho-hum. But Childress will start Frerotte if he can go. He’s just too scared of Jackson right now, knowing that if the kid plays poorly it will make them both look even worse. Know what really makes Childress look bad though? every good game Tyler Thigpen has.
by Bodysuit Man on Dec 9, 2008 3:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No Deep Pass
The problem is , there has been very few deep passes called for for TJ have you seen him throw deep passes , cause Ihave he can easily throw farther than Gus. He had no problem hitting deep passes in the preseason and also last year how many went thru aligator arms williamson’s hands.
The only person responsible for him not having thrown more deep passes in the coach calling the plays.
by Nefarien on Dec 9, 2008 3:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I should have clarified
Tarvaris has an absolute cannon of an arm, which is one of the main reasons the Vikings drafted him in the first place. However, like Michael Vick, he hasn’t necessarily been able to control that cannon in deep passes. I’ll give you that he would have at least 5 more career long TD passes if it wasn’t for Troy “I Gave Away Randy Moss and All I Got Was This Lousy Receiver” Williamson. However, during the opening night MNF matchup, Tirico or Kornheiser gave out a stat that T-Jax’s career completion percentage on throws of more than 20 yards was something abysmal like 18 or 23%.
I’m really rooting for whoever gets the nod on Sunday, but like I said, don’t be surprised when our QB plays like a backup.
by ericj69 on Dec 10, 2008 1:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
...
I’m in a hurry and I haven’t read this entire thread yet, so if someone has mentioned this already, I apologize.
When this NFL season comes to an end, Indy and Green Bay will both be considered two of the toughest defenses in this league for opposing quarterbacks. What this means is that Tarvaris isn’t the only QB in this league to struggle with those pass defenses.
Whatever veteran knowledge/experience Gus has on the field that Tarvaris doesn’t is cancelled out by Tarvaris’ athletic/playmaking ability. When it comes down to it, we have two quarterbacks who are pretty much the same level of effectiveness— except one is really young and one is really old. All things equal, youth prevails.
Let the kid lead the team.
by drew10 on Dec 9, 2008 2:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
What are you basing that off of?
What are you basing those claims on?
Green Bay got absolutely torched by the Texans last weekend. They have had a very good secondary, no doubt about it, but especially recently they’ve been extremely spotty. They have up 400+ yards to the Texans on Friday.
The Colts I really have no knoweldge of at the moment and how their secondary is. Bob Sanders has been out for most of this year, so that’s always a blow.
Quickly, if you check Football Outsiders, as of week 14, Green Bay is nine and Indy 10. That’s overall, but still.
What are you basing those claims off of?
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Dec 9, 2008 3:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I happened to read something...
That said a big reason for the Texans success was that Woodson was playing safety, so Tramon Williams was the CB opposite Harris, and he gave up 2 or 3 big plays on double moves. Most of the yards (according to what I read) came on passes to TEs and RBs, which were more the LBs responibilities. Make of this what you will. Just thought I’d mention it.
…
Darn it, I just defended the Packers!!! I should be shot.
In AP I trust
by FarvaForTheVikings on Dec 9, 2008 10:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah -
Yes, they did shuffle some things around, but the Packers defense has gotten torched a few times in the past few games. I don’t think they made a smart decision in moving one of their top corners to safety, but then again, I’m not an NFL head coach or defensive coordinator. I’m sure that played a part, but you have to take their entire body of work if you’re going to judge them as one of the top defenses in the league. That includes the Texans game.
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Dec 10, 2008 8:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Basing it off of
Passing yards allowed per game: Indy 5th, Green Bay 12th.
Passing TDs allowed on the season: Indy 1st (4 total passing TDs allowed..wow), Green Bay 18th
Interceptions: Indy 9th (14 INTS), Green Bay 5th (18 INTS)
QB Rating Against: Indy 9th, Green Bay 5th
I definitely should have said tougher and not toughest pass defenses in the league, but I will argue that Tarvaris played the Green Bay Packers defense when it was at it’s most effective and healthy.
Also, the numbers prove he’s not the only QB to struggle to get into Indy’s end zone.
I honestly just feel like we have two quarterbacks of pretty much equal effectiveness, I just wish they’d roll with youth in the case of a tie.
by drew10 on Dec 10, 2008 1:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
T-jax and Tebow
1st Why is everyone up north so anti Tebow? Did any of you even watch the Alabama game? I have watched this kid from a frosh and he never ceases to amaze me. Sure, he is not the pretty technique boy with the slender, lean body but he makes it work day in and day out. Don’t give me the Heisman curse crap. Some have done well. Tebow will not embarass this team and town with humiliating escapades off the field and he plays with an old school attirude ala Jared Allen. Just not as goofy off the field. I think Jared rocks! Tebow is a born leader and will run with the force of a LB when he needs too. I’m sick of all these pretty boyz who come in all touted up and turn out to be losers. The QB position is a crap shoot. This time I think they shoud shoot for a QB with an attitude. Minny would fall in love with this kid.
T-Jax, as I have said before, may have been done a favor by sitting out. By his own admission he said he was try too hard to be perfect. A couple of us here pondered the issue of a QB buddy system. Where is Gus best at in certain situations. Then yank the covers on a D and send in T-jax to pass short , hand off or take off with it. Keep playing the hot hand. What the H? It worked Sunday although be it against Detroit.
I have been a T-jax detractor not because of him but just the timing of trying to expect an unseasoned kid to lead a team to the promise land. I hope he make me eat crow and finish the season big. One could hope for nothing more as a fan and for T-jax himself. If he is really going to be the guy now is his chance to show what he learned and step and prove himself.
Finally, Allen never had the intent to injure on any plays I saw where he was find. This Detroit Kitty rookie sat there and eye balled JA coming across and calculated his hit. This is not bias but cold hard fact. If Jared was fined this punk should serve the 4 games. But you only get that if your a hefty Viking D lineman who took water pills. Hmmm? Someone elses knee or my own tubby water weight? Which is more deserving of a suspension?
Great discussions and comments from everyone. It’s always fun.
by CitrusFLViking on Dec 9, 2008 6:41 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Tebow, sentiments and Christmas Wishes
I was basing that on the many idiot comments in the Startrib blogs. Not here. People even saying we are being biased and 2-faced about the Allen hit. Makes me wanna barf!
The gang here is a smarter crowd by far. Whether I agree or not. For the most part bloggers here are smart. I learn a lot from many bloggers here.
This Christmas thanks to all of you sent well wishes concerning my accident. It was one year ago today I was in a coma at Shans in Gainsville. Basicly-dead. Now it’s home to Minn for the 1st time in 4 years and….the Falcons game!
If I don’t get to write from Minny, Merry Christmas to eveyone. Thanks for a great time Gonz. Hope to blog for the playoffs.
by CitrusFLViking on Dec 9, 2008 7:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Tebow actually sort of intrigues me
The guy obviously has a ton of character and is a great leader. . .hell, he goes off with his parents during the off-season and does missionary work, for crying out loud. . .but until a quarterback actually comes out of the University of Florida and accomplishes something in the professional ranks, there’s always going to be some degree of skepticism.
See also: Grossman, Rex. . .Weurffel, Danny. . .Palmer, Jesse. . .Leak, Chris. . .Matthews, Shane. . .
Like I said, I’m not anti-Tebow or anything. But I am skeptical about the kid.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
by Gonzo on Dec 9, 2008 7:24 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You Forgot...
One of the greatest University of Florida busts of all time…Heisman Trophy winner Steve Spurrier. Sure, you can argue that he’s been a great college coach but I remember years ago when he was in the NFL and all he ever did was play backup and punt. His claim to fame was the “flop” that he did every time he’d punt, trying to draw a roughing the kicker penalty.
by purplegrey on Dec 10, 2008 9:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
College football is a joke. . .
compared to the NFL. The defenses are light-years behind NFL squads both in terms of talent obviously and scheme. That’s why with only a few exceptions — Peyton Manning, Elway and Aikman — there’s almost no “sure thing” when it comes to that position in the NFL. I haven’t read one NFL scout yet who didn’t have anything but bad things to say about this year’s senior class.
The lucky rookie qb’s are those who go to a team with a strong running game and defense (think Flacco and Ryan) that doesn’t make them try and do too much too quickly and allows them to learn the nuances (especially making the crucial quick reads) of the pro game slowly.
by VikingBillArlingtonVA on Dec 9, 2008 8:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm?
Good point on FL QB’s. Maybe it might be more of a Gator jinx than a Hiesman one?
All in all, I would love to give any one of the QB candidates a shot in purple. As I said, QB’s are a crap shoot. We could list all the mid to late round picks that excell.
Seems your better off in FA and filling other needs earlier in the draft. I don’t know how OT’s look this year but that would be a start. If we could get 2 monsters early to take Cook and Mckinny’s place. Go for it!
Once again the writers here show common sense and good arguments. Well done.
by CitrusFLViking on Dec 12, 2008 3:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 


















