Where Gonzo Laughs at the Concept of "Grading" a Draft That Finished Less Than 24 Hours Ago
The 2008 Draft is in the history books, and we've now hit the inevitable period where the draft "experts" start handing out their draft "grades" based on their perceptions of how different teams performed over the weekend. They'll tell us about how so-and-so was a "steal" or how this guy was a "reach" and so forth, and there will be people that will take such talk as the gospel truth.
Meanwhile, I'm sitting here laughing my ass off at the entire exercise.
Don't get me wrong. . .we're entering the "dead" portion of the NFL season. The three months between the end of the draft and the beginning of Training Camp are damn near interminable for die-hard football fans. I realize that there are people out there that get paid a decent wage to talk about football year-round and, God bless 'em, they've got to come up with something to talk about during that time.
Maybe I'm a bit cynical about the entire thing because I still have echoes in my mind about how great the Vikings' 2005 Draft class allegedly was. Oh, there was praise all around for the Vikings' selections of Troy Williamson and Erasmus James and Marcus Johnson and on and on and on. That class, barring James and/or Johnson miraculously "getting it" this season, is on the verge of going down as the worst draft class in Minnesota Vikings history. Not one, but two first-round flops, a second-rounder that can't get off the bench. . .and, as of now, nobody else from that class to be found on the roster.
Now, liking or not liking the players a team drafts is one thing. . .attempting to grade the players themselves is something entirely different. For example, I thought that Kansas City did a pretty fine job getting players that could potentially help them in this year's draft. Everywhere I look, the Chiefs' draft is pretty highly graded by all of the aforementioned "experts." But if we look back three years from now and Glenn Dorsey has turned into Steve Entman and Branden Albert has become Marcus Johnson and other bad luck occurs for them, giving them an "A" now could potentially end up looking almost as ludicrous as the "A's" and "B's" that the Vikings' 2005 Draft class got are looking right about now. Draft grades are a lot like Girls Gone Wild videos. . .fun to look at, but not really anything to take too seriously.
Not. . .that. . .I'd. . .know. *ahem* Anyway. . .
If you'd like to discuss the Vikings draft "grades" and/or other aspects of this weekend's draft, please feel free to use this here thread to do it. I, personally, feel that it put the cap on a pretty productive off-season for the Vikings. I'll hopefully be back later with some more fun and excitement.
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
I pull similar stunts often.
“This is the BEST ham-n-cheese toastie EVER.”
“After that shower, this is the cleanest I’ve EVER BEEN.”
People kinda freaked out after the Santana trade, but in reality, much like the draft, you can’t really grade those transactions for a good 10 years after they’ve been made. Especially considering all the prospects that were handed over, and that Johan’s career is far from sunset. Or maybe I just tell myself that to help myself sleep at night…
Grading drafts has always been ridiculous to me—they’re nothing more than guy reactions from authorities who are basing their arguments on the same things they base what they want to have for lunch; it’s all about how they feel. It’s all based on potential and their own vision of the team…which makes it highly subjective and highly useless.
Having said that, I give the Vikes an ‘A’. Take that, authorities.
by Jesse on
Apr 28, 2008 9:06 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I LIKE IT!
Well, mostly.
Grading, like mock drafts = fun.
You can type your report and get it graded 3 years from now. I would say that is a interesting way of doing your homework.
Far as the ESPN Analysts of the world – bite me~
You can pick apart/build up anyone.
Other than the OT hole – it was a great draft!
Moved, when we needed to – grabbed some possible hack wanna be’s or future starters – Ask me in 2-3 yrs.
The picks were Solid I give it a A++ because of the first rd draft of Allen!
by Duluth Guy on
Apr 28, 2008 9:37 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
SOLID!
Gonzo – one has to give you a solid B+ for this commentary; you should have drawn more towards the Girls Gone Wild portion and really given us more to think about in that regard. :)
LIONS AND PACKERS AND BEARS..... WHO CARES!!! www.vikingsvalhalla.com
by skol4life on
Apr 28, 2008 3:26 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Average Grades
As I look around on some websites, most websites have either a B or an F. That is quite a range. I think they had a great draft, and most importantly we kept Tyrell away from our division competitors.
by gatty790 on
Apr 28, 2008 9:56 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks Gonzo!!!
LOL! Yes, it is eternally amazing how the professionals with their many scouts, interviews, group meetings, and all that money on the line can be instantly be assessed by these clairvoyant scribes the day after the draft. Where were these alleged psychics in hiding the day before the draft? I’m sure they could make a ton of money if they actually knew who is going to be injured, whom all the NFL teams should be picking, and how every college player will adapt to life in NFL football in every conceivable offense or defense!
You get an F for not obtaining a top ten pick in the 7th round? Were you supposed to steal the Raiders pick at gunpoint or manage to find some guy who won the Heisman anonymously?
Thanks, Gonzo, for helping to spare me these side-splitting annual evaluations! I might choke laughing and hurt myself!
by Elgar on
Apr 29, 2008 12:37 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
fantasy game
check this new free game out…build your own players and teams
pretty cool stuff
by BrettF on
Apr 29, 2008 3:10 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
















