The Vikings Are A Picture of. . .Consistency?
The impetus for this post comes from, of all places, Mile High Report. Apparently the good folks over there were looking in the Broncos media guide about how teams have performed since the AFL/NFL merger, and they seemed to be surprised by how consistent the Vikings have been since that merger. Here are some of the stats that they cite:
Winning Seasons
| Team | # | |
| 1 | Miami | 28 |
| 2 | Dallas | 27 |
| Pittsburgh | 27 | |
| 4 | Denver | 24 |
| Minnesota | 24 | |
| 6 | San Fran, Washington | 23 |
Overall Wins
| Team | # | |
| 1 | Pittsburgh | 379 |
| 2 | Dallas | 378 |
| 3 | Miami | 374 |
| 4 | Denver | 356 |
| 5 | San Francisco | 355 |
| 6 | Minnesota | 349 |
Regular Season Wins
| Team | # | |
| 1 | Miami | 354 |
| 2 | Pittsburgh | 351 |
| 3 | Dallas | 347 |
| 4 | Denver | 339 |
| 5 | Minnesota | 333 |
| 6 | San Francisco | 330 |
Home Wins (Regular Season)
| Team | # | |
| 1 | Pittsburgh | 210 |
| 2 | Denver | 207 |
| 3 | Miami | 204 |
| 4 | Dallas | 198 |
| 5 | Minnesota | 196 |
| 6 | Washington | 185 |
And the more I think about it, the more I realize that the folks at Mile High Report are absolutely correct. The Vikings HAVE been a very consistent team over the course of the last four decades. Unfortunately, that fact gets lost because the team has never won the Super Bowl. Whether that's the way it should be or not is a subject that's up for some debate. But let's illustrate this a little further by looking a little more closely, taking the records from Pro-Football-Reference.com.
Here's a breakdown of the Vikings' regular season records since the merger:
-Seasons with a winning percentage above .500: 24 (1970, 1971, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1980, 1982*, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2005)
-Seasons with a winning percentage of exactly .500: 6 (1972, 1983, 1991, 1995, 2004, 2007)
-Seasons with a winning percentage below .500: 8 (1979, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1990, 2001, 2002, 2006)
So, nearly 80% of the time since the NFL/AFL merger, the Minnesota Vikings have been average or better. There have been very few seasons where the Vikings were truly out of it from the very beginning of the year.
This is probably a part of why so many Viking fans like to play the "tortured fan" card, a card that I've been guilty of playing from time to time myself. It seems like the Beloved Purple is always in the running, but have never quite gotten to the top of the mountain. When it comes down to it, however, we're damn privileged to be fans of a team that give us a chance to win nearly every season. The point in time will come where that consistency will be rewarded with the big breakthrough we've waited all our Viking fandom for.
Enjoy the rest of your Tuesday night, ladies and gentlemen, and we'll see you back here tomorrow!
(One more thank you to the folks at Mile High Report for the stats cited above.)
0 recs |
9
comments
Read Related
Comments
Lest we forget...
Sure, the Vikings have had some bad breaks, but we need to step back and count our blessings. Some teams have never even been to the Super Bowl. Do you remember the 1980 50-yard, game-winning hail mary from Tarkington that bounced off five people before Amhad Rashed one-handed it and waltzed into the end zone with no time left? I I assure you that no one from Cleveland in that era has forgotten it. Cleveland has never been to the Super Bowl. They’ve been intercepted in the end zone by Oakland in the final minute, the victim of Elway’s “The Drive”, and run over by the perfect Dolphins in a championship game in which they once led. They have watched while their baseball team was getting a new stadium when the Browns weren’t and suddenly got this wake up call that their team was now going to become the Baltimore Ravens. Bad things don’t only happen to Minnesota, and we need to stay awake to see that some of them don’t happen here.
by Elgar on Jun 24, 2008 9:57 PM CDT 0 recs
Re: Tortured fan card
I’ve always felt that being close – but never reaching the top of the mountain – was in a lot of ways worse than never getting close at all. I know we’ve seen one of the most consistent teams in the NFL over the last 40 years – but really, which hurt more, 1998 or 2006?
by Jon Marthaler on Jun 25, 2008 12:45 AM CDT 0 recs
Which hurt more?
98 hurt more because they were so good and it seemed like destiny that we’d be going to the Super Bowl. 2000 was an utter embarrassment because it looked like the team gave up. Would I not ever want to get close like in those years? Nope, but you might ask a Detroit fan what it feels like.
Our time will come, just like Denver. It took their 5th appearance in the Big Show to notch their first win.
It may take a village to raise a child, but it takes a Viking to raze a village.
by Luft Krigare on Jun 25, 2008 5:58 AM CDT 0 recs
Who else feels our pain?
So, I thought I knew all of the other NFL teams that had either been to at least one Super Bowl and lost, or had never been. I was actually surprised to see there were a few more than I thought. And of course, yes the Lions are on the list!
The teams that have been to the Super Bowl and lost each time are the Buffalo Bills, been there 4 times consecutively (0-4); Cincinnati Bengals (0-2); Tennessee Titans (0-1); San Diego Chargers (0-1); Philadelphia Eagles (0-2); Minnesota Vikings (0-4); Carolina Panthers (0-1); Atlanta Falcons (0-1); Seattle Seahawks (0-1).
The Cleveland Browns; Jacksonville Jaguars; Houston Texans; Detroit Lions; New Orleans Saints, Arizona Cardinals have never played in a Super Bowl.
by colleyryan on Jun 25, 2008 5:37 PM CDT 0 recs
The Sisyphean Challenge
Sure, getting close hurts, but would you rather be a Lions fan (like KFAN’s Common) and have your CEO be Matt Millen, who should have quit while he was ahead, as a great linebacker? I guess the near miss is allegedly the worst, because the Greek gods decided to punish Sisyphus, the sneaky king of Corinth, by making him eternally roll a boulder up a mountain in the underworld and then make it fall back down each time just as he neared the summit. The French writer Albert Camus rewrote the story and pointed out that it takes guts to keep going and that perhaps that’s the meaning of life. (Of course, Camus lost some street cred with that idea by commiting suicide himself.) We all have to play the cards we’re dealt or fold. It could always be worse if we complain too much and don’t watch our step. I personally prefer Jared Allen’s outlook: Tell everyone that we’re coming and charge for the top.
by Elgar on Jun 26, 2008 2:14 PM CDT 0 recs
oh, the pleasures of being a Vikings' fan
—discussions of which quickly devolve into philosophical ruminations on Sisyphus, Camus, and Icelandic liquor.
What’ll happen if we ever win a Super Bowl, like Dr. Z says we will? The world might end. After all, our re-tooled D-line has been referred to as “the Four Norsemen of the Apocalypse.”
by virginia viking on Jun 26, 2008 3:23 PM CDT 0 recs
I don't know who referred to them as that.
But I like it almost as much as Skol-Aid.
by Robert Rence on
Jun 26, 2008 3:29 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The Four Norsemen of the Apocalypse
Really like that title for the Vikes D-Line this year.
by Iceland-Viking on
Jun 27, 2008 3:21 AM CDT
up
0 recs
4 Norsemen FYI
I heard (read) BigGun over at Valhalla say it first right after the trade.
Ya Sure You Bettcha
by The Bears are Ditkaless on Jun 28, 2008 12:06 AM CDT 0 recs











