Looking Back at the Vikings' 2008 Acquisitions
The Beloved Purple made many, many splashes over the course of the 2008 off-season. Some of those acquisitions made some pretty big splashes in the regular season for the Vikings as well. It's time to take a look back at the names the Vikings picked up prior to this season and see if their contributions were worth the time, effort, and money that Minnesota spent on them.
This list undoubtedly has to be kicked off with Jared Allen. A lot of folks thought that the Vikings were crazy to give the Chiefs the bounty that they did (the Vikings' first round pick and their two third round picks in the 2008 draft) and to give Allen the contract that they did (making him the league's highest-paid defensive player), particularly when Allen's well-documented off the field problems were taken into consideration. However, a couple of days later at the NFL draft, the Jacksonville Jaguars gave up even more (their first round pick, two third round picks, and a fourth round pick) to trade up to the #8 spot in the draft and take Florida defensive end Derrick Harvey. . .and then gave him $17 million in guaranteed money on top of it.
Harvey had 3.5 sacks in 11 games after an extended holdout. Jared Allen had 14.5 in 16 games. Which team was crazy again?
How good is Jared Allen? In 2007, without a whole lot on the defensive line to help him out, Allen had 15.5 sacks for the Kansas City Chiefs despite missing two games. In 2008, the Chiefs had 10 sacks as a team. Yes, that's ten. That's 1.5 more as a team than Kevin Williams had all by himself. Allen stepped into the Minnesota defense and, despite injury concerns and his self-admitted "problems" getting used to playing with new teammates, he gave the Vikings the best play at defensive end they've seen since Chris Doleman left town. He put constant pressure on quarterbacks, he opened things up for other Vikings' defenders in the pass rush, and he helped to elevate the Vikings' pass defense to a pretty decent level. Oh. . .and he gave us this. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
But you know what the best part is? The fact that Allen turns 27 this April. He averages 11.5 sacks a season. He's tougher than a two-dollar steak. And he's going to be a Viking for a very long time.
It won't be long before we're seeing the Steve Hutchinson effect with Jared Allen throughout the NFL. . .much like Hutchinson, the time is going to come very soon when guys that play the same position as Allen at a lesser level than Allen will start getting paid more than Allen. And when that happens, his contract is going to look like a bargain.
Not just content to make big noise in the trade market, the Vikings went and hit the free agent market as well, signing wide receiver Bernard Berrian, formerly of the Chicago Bears. Berrian was brought in to stretch the field and provide the Vikings' offense with a legitimate deep threat, and it's tough to say that he didn't do what he was advertised to do. He averaged over 20 yards a catch, the most for any NFL receiver with more than 30 catches, and provided us with one of the most exciting plays in Vikings' history.
Yeah, not the highest quality video of it, but it was the best that YouTube had to offer.
While he may have gotten off to a slow start and had a couple of games where he disappeared entirely, it's still tough to say that Berrian wasn't worth the money. He might not be a #1 receiver, but he's been very effective in the Minnesota offense to this point.
The Vikings also needed a quarterback and a mentor for Tarvaris Jackson for this season, so they talked Gus Frerotte out of retirement to be the backup. Frerotte took over the starting role in Week 3 and led the Vikings to an 8-3 mark in the games that he started. . .and I use the word "led" quite loosely, because the Vikings won as many games despite the presence of Frerotte as they did because of it. While Gus probably won't be back in 2009 because of the comments he made after the playoff loss to the Eagles, he played his role well in 2008, despite all of the ups and downs.
I was puzzled by the signing of Maurice Hicks when it happened. I was puzzled by it when the season started. I was more puzzled when I saw him actually return kicks. For a guy that was brought in almost exclusively to be a kick returner, the guy had an amazing propensity for taking the kickoff, going straight ahead, and running into a wall of defenders. No real moves, no great returns. . .and, to be honest, no reason to think that he'll be a Minnesota Viking next season. Darius Reynaud looked much better as a return guy than Hicks did, and could probably serve a dual role as punt returner as well.
Benny Sapp played adequately in most of the situations he was in last year. He started the season as Minnesota's #4 CB, and was elevated to the nickel role when Charles Gordon got his ankle turned to mush against Green Bay. He's probably best remembered by Vikings fans for getting a stupid penalty that negated a third down stop against Chicago just before the goal line stand/99-yard TD sequence. But he's at least earned the chance to come back in 2009 and compete for a roster spot.
Linebacker Derrick Pope got cut by the Vikings before the season even began. And that's the end of that chapter.
I'll say one thing about the Thomas Tapeh fiasco. It helped me to realize the value of Naufahu Tahi, particularly his value as a lead blocker. In fact, Tahi is so valuable as a lead blocker that I firmly believe that all plays that put him in a position to potentially catch the football should be removed from the playbook immediately.
(Seriously. . .dude averaged 2.3 yards a catch this year. He's over 6' tall, so if he catches the ball and falls down, you'd have to figure that's good for 2 yards, isn't it?)
Overall, there are more good things to be said about Minnesota's 2008 off-season acquisitions than there are bad things, in my opinion. Hopefully the Vikings can have the same level of success this off-season as well.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice review Gonzo,
But Benny Sapp played in the defensive backfield about as effectively as Beni Hana would have, and should immeditely be removed from the NFL.
One thing I do like about the Vikings is the owner. If there’s a guy, like Jared Allen, and the Rhombus of Reason says that’s a guy we need, Wilf signs the check and says do it. I remember there were a lot of people questioning the move at the time, saying the Vikes had given up too much. Are they saying that now? No. Why? Because draft picks are always over-valued by every team in the NFL. Since Jimmy Johnson came up wit that draft pick value chart, I think it skewed the value of draft picks way out of proportion.
I would like to see that again when it comes time to address the QB situation.
Thoughts on the Vikings, Buckeyes, and Cardinals
www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com
Draft Chart
The draft chart is supposed to show relative value of the picks, judged one against the other. In that context, I think it’s pretty good.
But if you look at the draft as a vehicle for picking up the best players, things get very dicey. How many top-ranked players have turned out to be a total bust? How many Heisman Trophy winners fell on their faces in the NFL? No amount of scouting can give a 100% guarantee that your #1 draft pick, hottest prospect since sliced bread, won’t turn out to be too fragile to make through pre-season in the NFL, or maybe he won’t be able to keep up with the NFL’s speed, whatever. It’s a crap shoot, and that’s the problem placing too much weight on a draft pick.
In the end, if you can pick up a hot player who’s proved that he can make it in the NFL, and not too old, in exchange for a few shots in the dark on the draft, I think it’s a smart choice. You’re getting a known quantity. The Vikings did that with Allen and the pay-off will keep on paying for years to come.
If they have to do it again to get the right QB, I say, spend the necessary draft choices and let someone else gamble in the draft, while the Vikes march towards the Super Bowl next year with a great QB at the helm.
Very few known quantities in the NFL
There have been many RFAs signed which didn’t match expectations (I thought that Vonnie Holliday had been acquired by the Chiefs from the Packers via RFA, and he was terrible in KC). Sometimes they hadn’t played much in their first 3 years, so the expectations weren’t based on very much (John Burrough).
Often times, the only thin an RFA has proven is the fact that he wasn’t worth starting for most or all of his first 3 years nor retaining for another year or three, regardless. In a young man’s league, that is already old and washed up. Almost any draftee has more unknown potential to become a starter than someone who certainly hasn’t, and most draft picks are a better value since RFA offers are purposely generous to discourage the old team from matching the offer.
Steve Hutchinson has worked out well as an RFA, but he is an exception to the rule (and not a bargain).
Cassel, Hasselbeck, Favre, Cullpepper, Kitna, Elway, Marino, Star, Unitas!!!!
The Vikes got plenty of live, barely-kickin’, good as gone, and dead QB options to help mentor Jackson for a few years!!!
I hope Zygi spends the big money to resurrect Johnny Unitas – I’m sure there’s some voodoo-witch doctor that can do it for a few million!!!
Ohhhh, I’m excited about this offseason – our team will finally become complete and perfect and capable of winning the Super Bowl!!! I know what your thinking – and yes I just finished a glass “the size of my head” of purple koolaid!!!
I agree with most of that but....
I’m not a fan of using a FB in front of AP. He didn’t have one in college and was a phenomenal runner there, and even said that he thinks the FB gets in his way a lot of times as a pro. And like you said, throwing the ball to him is a damned useless exercise adn a waste of down. I think we would be better off putting another WR on the field to spread the defense out a bit.
Or
Putting Chester Taylor out there with him. Neither one of them really need a lead blocker, so it’d potentially be tougher for defenses to figure out which one will get the ball going where. Plus, that would make for some better check downs on play action passes to AP than going to frickin Tahi.
This is
something I have been advocating since before the season began!
Tahi is useless
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Jan 18, 2009 10:19 AM CST up reply actions
I agree that Berrian would make a terrific #2 WR. I mean, he was servicable as a #1, but I think he’d be better as a #2. He might get more open if the defense didn’t have to key on him, as opposed to Bobby Wade, who’s a good slot reciever. So hopefully we’ll pick up a solid #1 wideout this year.
In regards to the Allen trade, I remember how so many other fans were comparing it to Hershell Walker. I’m pretty sure they were eating crow all season long. Especially if they were divisional fans. Oh, and that he had never gotten a 4th quarter sack in KC. I’m pretty sure he made some clutch 4th quarter sacks for us. It was definitely worth the picks we gave up. What would we have really gotten with the first rounder anyways? All the good O-linemen were gone, the supposedly better DEs have been nabbed. There was really nothing but WRs, and HBs left on the board where we were.
I’m hoping we can use the same tactic as last season to pick up another solid contributor to the team, but I’m not sure who to go for. We might be able to use that first rounder for an O-lineman anyways, unless there’s another run of them.
Read: you basically got a first rounder without having to develop them for 2-3 years. Though you had to pay second contract money. Thinking back to the prior season, he was exactly what the doctor ordered.
And the contract isn't out of line
WIth a top 10 pick anymore, when you do all the guaranteed money comaprisons and everything.
Thoughts on the Vikings, Buckeyes, and Cardinals
www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com
Totally.
The Jags are paying Derrick Harvey way too close to what Jared is making and they gave up just as much (if not more?) to get him.
The Jared Allen deal put more hair on our team’s collective chest and one mullet into the locker room. No rookie first rounder has the gusto he does.
jared allen is tough, that’s my favorite acquisition.. he started off slow, getting used to the team and everything, it’s on next season though!
What up?
by snakethejake on Jan 18, 2009 9:06 AM CST up reply actions
Painful Past
Let’s not even talk about the Walker fiasco…
I agree fully with you, on Berrian. My only concern is how much he’s being paid; does it hurt the cap too much in terms of filling the last gaps this year?
Same question applies this year; what would we get with a first rounder this year? The field is deep with linemen, and the Vikings are already pretty solid there.
Don't forget
Madieu Williams, we didn’t get to see him play until early November, but we did ink him for a $13 million bonus at the start of 2008 free agency. I would have liked to see Madieu and Sharper play the whole year together. With the Rookie Johnson filling in, Sharper was pretty quiet, didn’t get to see much ball hawking from him at all this year.
Late but good
Madieu was, I think, very impressive considering that he was out most of the season. He stepped right into the Vike’s secondary like he had been a starter there for years; I think he’s only going to be better next year.
OT
I see Jordan Gross is a FA. He is a RT but wonder if he could handle the right side until we develop a draft pick, then move him over to McKinny’s side. Might be worth it.
In regard to the fullback debate. Why not use Taylor and Peterson in the same backfield more? A double threat with Taylor as an out let for a dump pass. Also keep the D wondering, who will get the ball? I am not saying burn them out on every play but Taylor does great when he replaces AP. Putting both out there might produce 2 1000 yd rushers.
I am burnt out on the QB soap oprah. Have to wait until things start moving when free agency starts.
How bout Gruden for OC? Too much $ I would guess but I got a look at the guys playbook when our friend tried out for the Bucs. Pretty mind boggling. Got to be better than what we have been watching.
by CitrusFLViking on Jan 17, 2009 12:51 PM CST reply actions
Overall, you have to call the moves a success.
Allen and Berrian alone made a big enough impact, and it was reflected in the record and brief playoff appearance. Hicks was an absolute nightmare, and a couple of the minor pickups didn’t work, but in my opinion the Vikings are in better shape this offseason than they were a year ago. If Wilf & Co. can put together those final couple of pieces (cough cough QUARTERBACK), the Vikes just may be able to play multiple playoff games in 2009.
by Eric J. Thompson on Jan 17, 2009 7:04 PM CST reply actions
Gah!
I can’t believe I totally forgot Madieu Williams. Damn it.
I’ll have to throw an addendum about him into a future post.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
by Christopher Gates on Jan 18, 2009 11:36 AM CST reply actions
2009-10 Vikings
I had hope at the beginning of this season but I have no hope for next year. I hate being a pessimist but with Childress as the head coach and no prospects for a quarterback with leadership and skills, the Vikings will be fortunate to finish 8-8. Green Bay will be better, Chicago will be the same and Detroit has to improve.
I watched the Cardinals; I am saying the “Cardinals” beat Philadelphia this afternoon and really became disheartened at the prospects for the Vikings next year. Kurt Warner at 37 years old has more fire than either Tavaris or Gus showed this year. I see a terrible waste of a potentially great defense and a sound offense once again in Minnesota under Childress’ leadership.
All of this great talent wasted. This is so sad.

by 




















