If we can't get Cassel, how about Hasselbeck?
From SI.com's "Truth And Rumors":
Before Sunday's playoff loss to the Philadelphia Eagles, Tarvaris Jackson was expected to be the Vikings' top quarterback heading into training camp next season. Now, though, Jackson's status is unclear. The Vikings might have options to find a starting quarterback, but those, too, are unclear. If team owner Zygi Wilf, who invested $60 million in guaranteed contracts this season, is willing to guarantee an additional $30 million or so, the team might be able to pry Matt Cassel away from the New England Patriots. Besides a new contract for Cassel, 26, the price of a trade would be high -- perhaps first-round and second-round draft picks. It's unclear whether New England would be willing to trade Cassel, an unrestricted free agent who is expected to be designated a franchise player, thus guaranteeing him about $14.5 million for the coming season. Cassel would provide hope for Vikings rooters, retain the team's visibility and might even enhance Wilf's effort for a new stadium. A more realistic and practical objective, though, might be to trade with Seattle for Matt Hasselbeck, 33, who probably would be available for a second-round draft pick. The Seahawks, 4-12 this season, need to rebuild.
Getting Cassel, like we've all anticipated, sounds probably too expensive for a guy that's only started one year in the NFL. I would be more than OK with giving up a 2nd rounder for Hasselbeck, a proven veteran who was healthy every year until The Seattle Injury Curse struck everyone on the team this season. What do you guys think? I didn't know Hasselbeck would even be in the conversation, but it makes sense that Seatlle would want to start over.
This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.
0 recs |
13 comments
Comments
That's what I said, too...
I never even thought about Hasselbeck. I didn’t realize he was only 33. For some reason, I thought he was closer to the 36-37 area. That sounds almost perfect – a crafty veteran to bring in and compete with the young gun.
He would almost certainly win the job in training camp, and with the whole offseason to get healthy, he could be the largest missing piece to the Vikings’ Super Bowl puzzle.
New coaching staff, starting over, rebuilding…yeah, it could work. It could really work.
When I first heard about it earlier today, it really made the most sense of anything I had heard. This is, of course, assuming the Patriots franchise Matt Cassel, who has been my pick for awhile. I’d take Matt Hasselbeck any day of the week, though. Don’t get me wrong.
On a side note, we’ve been in the offseason for almost three days now, and I’m already to the point of stabbing my eyes out because I want next year to start.
This is gonna be a longggggggggggggggggggggggg year.
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Jan 7, 2009 1:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I didn't even realize he was an option.
But I would love this. I’d definitely give up a 2nd rounder for him. Forget Cassel if he’s franchised, I definitely hope we pursue Hasselbeck.
In AP I trust
by FarvaForTheVikings on Jan 7, 2009 2:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
2 rounder?
I think it will cost more than that, Vikings aren’t the only team that needs a quarterback. Plus, he’s going to want a new contract when he gets to wherever he’s going.
Norm Green still sucks!
by diok9 on Jan 7, 2009 2:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
He wants money?
Give him money. The biggest piece of the puzzle could be solved in one trade.
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Jan 7, 2009 2:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not my money
So sure, why not?
Norm Green still sucks!
by diok9 on Jan 7, 2009 3:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That's the attitude I like to see!
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Jan 7, 2009 3:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hey My Idea First =P
I posted that I would be happy to pick up Hassleback if Seattle was looking to rebuild.
http://www.dailynorseman.com/2009/1/5/709896/why-the-minnesota-vikings#11185980
He would be happy to get out of Seattle. The only problem is how much bad blood is left between the Hawks and the Vikes over the Hutchinson acquisition and their ridiculous payback with Burleson (hows that worked out for them?)
If the Vikes only had to give up a 2nd for him, I think the Vikes should jump on that quick. He still has 3 years left on his contract and seems to be pretty cheap. Originally it was for 6 years for 47 million with a 16 million signing bonus.
Now I don’t know what the cap implications are with a trade, but it would appear that Hassleback would only cost the Vikes something like 5-6 million a year. Perhaps it would be a little higher if the Vikes have to cover the singing bonus amortization over the 6 years but even if it is 2 million more a season 8 million a season for a starting QB of Hassleback’s quality would be a steal.
by vikedawg on Jan 7, 2009 9:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
If this deal can happen, we need to pull the trigger.
by Frost on Jan 7, 2009 10:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
****Shooter Alert*****
Seems like SI FanNation always take something from that schizo scribe. If it came from a credible source like Jansen,Zulgad, Scoggins, or Seifert. I’ll buy it.
http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_11389386
Charley Walters: New quarterback would be costly for Minnesota Vikings
Pioneer Press
Posted: 01/06/2009 12:01:00 AM CST
Before Sunday’s playoff loss to the Philadelphia Eagles, Tarvaris Jackson was expected to be the Vikings’ top quarterback heading into training camp next season.
Now, though, Jackson’s status is unclear. The Vikings might have options to find a starting quarterback, but those, too, are unclear.
If team owner Zygi Wilf, who invested $60 million in guaranteed contracts this season, is willing to guarantee an additional $30 million or so, the team might be able to pry Matt Cassel away from the New England Patriots.
Besides a new contract for Cassel, 26, the price of a trade would be high — perhaps first-round and second-round draft picks. It’s unclear whether New England would be willing to trade Cassel, an unrestricted free agent who is expected to be designated a franchise player, thus guaranteeing him about $14.5 million for the coming season.
But the Vikings were able to trade with Kansas City last year for defensive end Jared Allen, who also had been franchised, for a first-round and two third-round draft picks.
Cassel would provide hope for Vikings rooters, retain the team’s visibility and might even enhance Wilf’s effort for a new stadium.
A more realistic and practical objective, though, might be to trade with Seattle for Matt Hasselbeck, 33, who probably would be available for a second-round draft pick. The Seahawks, 4-12 this season, need to rebuild.
by ELO Vike Fan 1977 on Jan 8, 2009 9:05 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
LOL @ Sea Gulls
Man, are they still bitter as hell towards Minnesota. Especially this article…
http://www.fieldgulls.com/2009/1/4/709085/minnesota-s-loss-could-be
This article is ridiculous and not at all fathomable. How’s 4-12 treatin’ ya, Seattle??
V-I-K-I-N-G-S! Skol Vikings, Let's Go!!
by TheViking83 on Jan 8, 2009 9:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Would be nice, but...
Obtaining a “younger” veteran like Hasselbeck who we could plug in as a starter would be ideal. He would give us the flexibility to let T-Jack sit, learn and develop as a #2 while continuing to develop another young QB at #3, be it Booty or a pick in this year’s draft. If in a couple of years niether T-Jack or the #2 is ready we can draft another QB to develop while riding Hasselbeck for another couple of years. If T-Jack or the#3 is ready in a couple of years we can trade Hasselbeck and recoup some of his cost.
Even though his back injury gives me serious concern, I would much rather have Hasselbeck than Cassel. Hasselbeck is familiar with the West Coast system and would need little time to adjust. He has also proven he can be successful throwing to good, but not great WR’s.
Unfortunately I don’t think Hasselbeck is a realistic option. While Seattle might consider trading him for say a 2nd and 5th to someone like the Jets, I think it would take a King’s ransom for Seattle to send him Minnesota’s way. I fear there is still too much lingering anger and resentment over the Hutchison signing.
It's good to be King!
by The King on Jan 8, 2009 10:54 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hasselbeck would be perfect,
but a he would only solve the problem for 3-4 years.
But it could be a very memorable 3-4 years!
Thoughts on the Vikings, Buckeyes, and Cardinals
www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com
by MilCardFan on Jan 16, 2009 7:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Go for it!
3-4 years is all we need to win a superbowl.
by MinnesotaRage on Jan 29, 2009 8:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















