Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Odds On Peyton Manning's Next Home Includes Three Teams

Regardless of QB

First of all I am a TJack fan, people fail to grasp that is called development and Tavaris has constantly imporved and he is a great athlete.  That said ... it is not the point of my post.   My point is ....

Regardless of our QB our coach and coordinators need to do a better job of disguising run / pass.   When AD is on the field 90% of the time it's a run, Taylor = pass.  It's ridiculous. It's absurd they might as well be holding giant queue cards they say we re RUNNING or we are PASSING.

In my my humble opinion they need to disrupt that ratio, and for the love of God run more pro form sets where both Taylor and Peterson are on the field.  Game planning to to stop them both at the same time  would almost certainly keep the opposing line backers attention.

Confusing the defenses more allows Peterson more room and should give our QBs more windows of opportunity regardless of the QB.    We don't need to trade, draft, or spend money to alter our offensive strategy and therefor first and foremost this HAS to change.

This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.

Comment 38 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Don't you know ...

… the KAO is perfect. PERFECT i say! when the Reciever’s fail to get the ball because the Dbacks are drapped all over them, it is their fault they didn’t get seperation. not because the opposing team knew it was a passing play with absolute 100% certainty.

when AP gets only 1 yard on a rush 10 times, and then busts one loose for 50 on the 11, it has nothing to do with his skill. and every thing to do with execution. clearly he is not executing on those 10 rushes for 1 yard each, 11 men in the box be damned, if he had executed he would bust it loose every time, because the KAO is Awsome like that!

Back to seriesness, it is not the personell htat is the problem. it is the scheme. it has its good moments but those 2 yard dump passes to Tahi on 3rd and long, need to be eliminated. we need to add plays that put both Taylor and AP on the field at the same time. and finally we need to add at least 2 audibles to the offense, one to audible into a pass when there are 11 men in the box, and the other to audible into a run, when the safeties are cheating back into coverage.

Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?

by the Real Thor on Jan 8, 2009 8:32 AM CST reply actions  

wow you are so smart

you are so smart i don’t know what to say. You ave solve all our problem. I can’t belief it. Why didn’t read you post sooner. If i had read your post sooner i would hav had a happy season. If you belief what i just said , i have a piece of land in Florida to sell to you for $1 dollar.

by vikefansd on Jan 8, 2009 11:43 AM CST reply actions  

Don’t say things like “he has consistently improved” and leave it at that, as if it’s an indisputable fact. His improvement is quantifiable, and as anyone who cares to study the facts can see in the following link that he has hardly grown in leaps and bounds from his rookie starts three seasons ago:

Sure, he’s a good athlete, and sure, we all want him to succeed. But that doesn’t mean he is succeeding, and frankly, athleticism tends to stunt many a QB’s growth rather than augment it.

He just can’t read defenses right now. Brad Childress, Jackson’s biggest supporter (who doesn’t frequent a Vikings blog), doesn’t seem to trust him with anything other than 5 yard check down passes even when the game is on the line and the team has to go down the field, so what should that tell us? And despite one of the league’s top rushing attacks, Jackson isn’t able to parlay that into useful football experience unless the team has somehow gained a three TD lead on their opponent—which happens how often?

But as it is now, he can’t read a defense and make a play other than to take off running. You have to wonder whether or not he ever will be able to read a defense if he can’t yet. So the question is how long do you give him?

For that matter, how long do other franchises give QBs to succeed? Who are the QBs who required three or more years who ended up being good QBs? I know Alex Smith, Joey Harrington, Rex Grossman, J.P. Losman, Kyle Boller, and Patrick Ramsey got three or more years to succeed (and all of them played a higher level of college competition before being drafted btw) and still didn’t turn into anything more than borderline backups. David Garrard is the only one who can be thought to have figured the pro game out, but this season was a major step backward for him so that’s still up in the air.

So other than blind faith, or gut feeling, or plain old hope and prayers, what would make someone think Tarvaris Jackson is special enough to break the odds, especially considering he is one of the worst coached QBs in the league to boot?

by Bodysuit Man on Jan 8, 2009 1:57 PM CST reply actions  

Right on Bodysuit!

I’ve said it all along, TJ can not throw a pass unless he has a coach pulling his arm back and releasing. I am so sick of hearing about how he is constantly improving and that it just takes time. The QB is the most important position. If the Vikes are not going to field a player that can win NOW, then why even sign players like Jared Allen? If it had not been for Childress and his devotion to Jackson, we may have been going into next season with promise intsead of hope. Man, I’m furious!

"Skol pa fiskande"

by NobleSavage on Jan 8, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Right on Bodysuit!

someone is making some sense. congrat!!!!!!

by vikefansd on Jan 8, 2009 4:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Firstly, each quarterback you’ve mentioned has at least ‘several’ more starts and most of them have ‘many’ more than Tavaris Jackson. Each of them was given an opportunity immediately which may have been beneficial to their development (you don’t really learn by not playing) or to their detriment. Garrard was a fourth year player before getting his opportunity, so I don’t understand why you’d include him (he’s had a significant number more starts as well).

Three years experience sounds like a lot (for arguments sake), but when you’ve played just more than a season worth of games I think that argument is exposed as at least misleading. Your critique of Jackson includes his first year in which he played significantly in 2 games. You may not have liked what you’ve seen over the course of his career, but you can’t portend to have such thorough evaluation of his talents and abilities with such a limited number of games played.

Secondly, of the quarterbacks you mention, only J.P. Loseman has a better completion percentage than Jackson, and other than Ramsey, all of them throw more interceptions per passes attempt (albeit they’ve all played significantly more time).

Now whether or not Jackson will ever develop into a dominate passer, with or without Childress’ expert tutelage is open for debate too. I just don’t understand how you’d convict with such little evidence.

by LoveHate on Jan 8, 2009 3:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Tjack started more game than Cassell

What are you rammbling about now. When a qb go up to the line he has to read the defense and call protection schem. Tjack can not see the the db is cheaating on the line in the first half, and jumping the route. It is his job to call a double move on the db. Stop your crying. I gaurantee that Tjack will not be the starter for this team. Ziggy will not stand for that. The vet on the team is no going to stand for it either. So start crying if you love him so much

by vikefansd on Jan 8, 2009 4:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe

If you’d actually played team sports, or if you coached like he does, you’d be smart enough to understand what he was saying.

My apologies, but this dude rubs me the wrong way. For what it’s worth, I have to agree with you. It’s extremely frustrating to me that most Vikings fans don’t have any desire to be somewhat patient with much of anything, let alone TJ. He’s really the best option anyway, because they aren’t getting a “veteran” QB to step in for a year or two, and no rookie is going to jump right in and perform better. If they can shore up the O-Line (what I thought killed them in the playoff game) TJ will be just fine and even win some games if needed.

by cheaptoy on Jan 8, 2009 8:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Really

Are you saying that we couldn’t entice Jeff Garcia with a 3 year 20-25 million dollar contract? He would be an instant improvement over TJ.

What got them killed was not the O-line, but TJ’s inability to recognize where the blitz was coming from and throw to the appropriate hot read. There is little the O-Line can do when the eagles overload rush and bring 4 guys being blocked by 3 linemen.

by vikedawg on Jan 8, 2009 8:17 PM CST up reply actions  

This is what I am talking about - Entice Garcia with $20-25 Mil?

I stand a better chance at commanding a $7 million dollar salary than Jeff Garcia ($2 mil in ‘08). However, no one is saying his addition wouldn’t be a plus.

The teams entire passing game is in disarray; during the Eagles game, the appropriate ‘hot reads’ didn’t even know when they were the ‘hot read!’ It is not all on the quarterback despite what you think. Vikings receivers ran the routes that were called each and every time and time and again weren’t recognizing who was uncovered or where the holes in the zone were – you saw open receivers?

by LoveHate on Jan 8, 2009 11:07 PM CST up reply actions  

I was obviously using hyperbole on Garcia

in response to that we can’t get a veteran QB to play for us for a couple of years. If I had my wish we would get Hassleback by trading the Hawks our 2nd round pick.

As for seeing open receivers, there is no way to see whether there were open receivers or not. The camera coverage on TV is limited. However, if you blitz, or overload rush, someone is going to be single covered, and most likely open. It is the responsiblity of the QB to recognize where the rush is coming from and then decide on the throw. TJ is not good at this. I am not going to dispute that Rice is a pretty bad receiver and has problem running routes (known when drafted), but Wade and Berrian run good routes so the receivers can’t explain TJ’’s problem.

by vikedawg on Jan 9, 2009 9:30 PM CST up reply actions  

It is not singularily the QB's responsibility

Receivers have to be aware of the defensive coverage too! If the person covering me leaves on a blitz, I need to know where his help is coming from and get open. Any receiver could be the ‘hot route’ on any given play depending on where the blitz is coming from. It doesn’t all fall on Jackson’s shoulders.

That is not to say the position isn’t in need of improvement.

by LoveHate on Jan 10, 2009 12:04 AM CST up reply actions  

All you Jackson haters are a joke. The guy has improved, Childress yanked him after two games saying he wasn’t aggressive enough, gee where did he get that idea (“we need a care taker” … I’d say he learned a lesson from the previous year), then he sits. Did he learn his lesson? I think he looked pretty damn good in his return. Lesson learned in my book. Tony Romo got shreaded by the Philly defense. If you want to attack Tavaris go to anyone of 10,000 threads doing just that. Look back at the last twenty years of Vikings QB and TJ has as much or more talent and potential than nearly all of them. Seriously, Jeff George, Jim Mcmhamon, Warren Moon, Salsbury, Wilson, Bollinger, Johnson, Holcombe . . .

This was not intended to be a QB discussion thread, there are thousands of them already. If you want to attack Tavaris go to anyone of 10,000 threads doing just that.

I posted this to place a degree of fault with those that are calling the plays. I will say again regardless of this teams’ QB these coordinators cannot tip their hands to the opposing defenses as they do play after play. This is something that would require millions of dollars, drafts picks, or players and it would make a meaningful difference.

Vikefansd … “start crying if you love him so much” . Dude whats wrong with you.

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff222/LeoGetz25_2007/Peterson28-1.png

by aceinthecorner on Jan 8, 2009 6:14 PM CST reply actions  

Hear Hear

You are so right. The play calling has been predictable ALL season. The fact that our team made the post season speaks volumes for the level of talent and heart they possess..not because of the coaches play calling ability. The coaches should have recognized in the 1st half of the Eagles game that the defensive backs were jumping the routes and made adjustments during the break. Isn’t that what pro coaches normally do? You go into halftime down by two points and you’re getting the ball first in the second half and all you accomplish is a three and out? That’s just as much or more on the coaches as it is on any player.

by purplegrey on Jan 8, 2009 6:29 PM CST up reply actions  

He can read defense

i am watching the game i was telling my friend that they are jumping the route.

by vikefansd on Jan 8, 2009 8:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Can or Can't?

I’m sure you weren’t the only one watching the game that saw the defensive backs jumping the routes. The coaches should have worked double moves into the game plan at halftime. That’s what coaches are supposed to do. You posted up above that he can’t read defenses…then you posted that he can. Make up your mind or try to do a better job of proofreading your posts.

by purplegrey on Jan 8, 2009 11:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Re: Right on Bodysuit!

Are you paying attention? Seriously. Take a look at Tavaris numbers after his return.

QB ratings,
Week 14: 115
Week 15:143.8
Week 16: 135
Week 17: 95

9 touchdowns and 2 interceptions.

Seriously are you paying attention? Do you know what developing a QB means? How can you say he hasn’t improved?

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff222/LeoGetz25_2007/Peterson28-1.png

by aceinthecorner on Jan 8, 2009 6:21 PM CST reply actions  

I never said he hasn't improved.

I’m just sick of hearing about it, while at the same time losing games that we should win. Regardless of how much he has improved, the bottom line is he has not shown the ability read a blitz….other than the occasional rush. I guarantee that after watching how the Eagles chewed him up in the second half, every team next year will bring the heat. I do not believe that Jackson has the vision to be a great QB. Oh and by the way, you failed to include the most important QB rating of the season, the dismal 45.4 he had in the playoffs. I think that anyone that believes the Vikings are “developing” a franchise quarterback are sorely mistaken. Hopefully I’ll eat my words, but until Jackson proves he can be a true leader, I’ll remain hungry.

"Skol pa fiskande"

by NobleSavage on Jan 9, 2009 9:53 AM CST up reply actions  

What Strikes Me...

As somewhat curious, is how many of the “Haters” point to Jackson not calling audibles at the line in obvious situations as proof that he isn’t capable. Three seasons ago when ‘Superbowl Winner’ Brad Johnson quarterbacked this team he was unhappy that Childress didn’t allow him to audible; Holcomb didn’t audible, Bollinger didn’t audible, Frerotte never audibled, but T-Jack sucks because he doesn’t audible. Childress’ KAO is fairly rigid and limiting and is, to a degree, responsible for the success of the players on the field.

For all of the criticism due Tavaris Jackson, so much is missed with the pissing so many seem to do.

by LoveHate on Jan 8, 2009 7:35 PM CST reply actions  

I understand you now

It is the coach fault that he can see rec down field, he can see db jumping route, he can call peotection schem. Ok i got it it is all the coach fault. In all serious you don’t really belief that do you.

by vikefansd on Jan 8, 2009 8:35 PM CST up reply actions  

????

What the hell is a “peotection schem” ???

by purplegrey on Jan 8, 2009 11:28 PM CST up reply actions  

The Reason

that we run with AD in the backfield but rarely pass is that he can’t block for shit, and doesn’t catch the ball well either. This is why there are hardly ever any screens called for AD, even though everyone in the league has nightmares about AD in open space. AD needs to stand in front of a passing machine all off-season, work with CC, and anything else to become a better pass-catcher. He then needs to work with someone to improve his blocking so that it is at least acceptable.

I wholeheartedly agree with having AD and Chester in the backfield at the same time. Childress won’t let it happen though, hell he won’t allow audibles for christ’s sake. I surprised that he uses the forward pass. I feel the same way I did in the late 90’s that we are utterly wasting the talent on our team with an absolutely terrible coach. The vikings for whatever reason seem to be pretty good talent evaluators and seem to mostly make good draft picks and FA acquisitions, and then they waste it with terrible coaching. Denny was terrible, Ear Pencil was indescribably bad, and chilly shrunken penis seems like a frog caught in a flashlight. If we had a halfway competent coach the Vikes would be perennial powerhouses at at least two superbowl games.

All that being said, I would bet $100 that TJ has a worse career than Eric Kramer.

by vikedawg on Jan 8, 2009 8:13 PM CST reply actions  

I second this

“All that being said, I would bet $100 that TJ has a worse career than Eric Kramer”.

by vikefansd on Jan 8, 2009 8:39 PM CST reply actions  

ok

QB ratings,
Week 14: 115-beat the pittyfil lion
Week 15:143.-beat arizona that that went to sleep
Week 16: 135-lost 2 fumble while in the red zone
Week 17: 95-beat a second team defense and almost lost
Week 18: 45 – lost to the eagle can read defense. def jumping route and can’t see it
That is really good record.
Gus suck i think 15td-13int and have a 8-3 record find way to win when behind. Let me see tjack suck and Gus suck but he win. give me Gus

by vikefansd on Jan 8, 2009 8:51 PM CST reply actions  

Re:ok

you make no sense Vikesfand and you are exactly the kind of Vikings fan that pisses me off. TJ throws a pick against a Philly defense and one of the best corners in the game and you think he sucks. That’s a joke, you dismiss TJ last four games where his average was well over 100, and you make no mention of Gus’ 70 something average, nevermind that Gus almost lost to the Lions twice, nevermind that half of 12 interception were just as bad or worse than Gus’ and game came against worse teams and corners. You point to Gus’ record. .. take a look at Jacksons’ record last year.

Vikesfansd go back to the Packer website and quit posting here as if you’re a Vikings. And if you’re a fan stop and formulate an intelligent thought and quit posting non sense.

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff222/LeoGetz25_2007/Peterson28-1.png

by aceinthecorner on Jan 9, 2009 5:21 AM CST reply actions  

Re: understand you now

At no point did I say that int was the coaches fault. It was a bad read, every QB in the history of football has made bad reads and bad throws (your beloved Gus had 12 of them)

I think if you earn to read vikesfand you will see what I said was regardless of our QB we are doing our offense no favors by so obviously tipping our hat to the defenses. That was the point.

Seriously vikesfand, stop collect yourself, and think of something intelligent to say or stop talking.

http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff222/LeoGetz25_2007/Peterson28-1.png

by aceinthecorner on Jan 9, 2009 5:28 AM CST reply actions  

Not to harp, but...

Gus threw 15 int’s this season. Most for any quarterback per attempt.

by LoveHate on Jan 9, 2009 9:55 AM CST up reply actions  

I have a serious question. I’m not trying to be a jerk, or upset you or anything, but I think it would help clear up a lot of people’s thoughts…. is English your second languauge? I think the reason he said you were unintelligent is because you tend to use the wrong form of a lot of words.

Again, not trying to be a jerk, just asking a serious question.

V-I-K-I-N-G-S! Skol Vikings, Let's Go!!

by TheViking83 on Jan 10, 2009 4:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Deathstarvikings_small
2012 Draft Player Rankings: Top 10 UPDATE 1.0
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Kira_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall