Daily Norseman: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Guest Blogger: Juco All-American Answers Five Questions

Offensive offensive line? and an observation on schedule strength

This post is interested in understanding and drawing comparisons between recent season's offensive line play and this year's O-line and is not intended to be a rah-rah or 'aren't they so great' post. Just wanted to get that out there right away so if people aren't interested in reading my questioning of the Vikes they won't have to.

 

Having said that, are there any great football minds out there who have questions about our offensive line like I do? A lot has been made about AD getting stuffed a lot, and I am beginning to think that there's something to that than just 8 guys in the box. Favre offsets a lot, but why are teams still so focused on stopping Adrian? And perhaps more to the point, if Adrian truly is the best RB in football, why isn't he performing better? Cris Carter produced despite the focus of the D, same with Moss. Randle used to be triple teamed and still produced. I don't buy that AD is the best RB in the NFL and can't run against 8 or 9 guys in the box, especially with Favre as QB.

 

Adrian's rushed for the lowest yardage total through five games of his career while having the best QB play of his career. In my mind this doesn't add up, and I can think of these potential reasons:

1) the O-line is banged up/not as good (yet) as they've been. I think Hutch is hurting more than we know, and I think we're missing Birk more than we know. Loadholt is an upgrade, but this line (so far) is the weak link of our offense and our extended post-season dreams.

2) the play calling strategy is ill-informed, in that Chilly's tendency to not care whether the other team knows what you're going to do or not and rely on execution hurts this team's performance and efficiency over the long haul. Expecting your team to physically beat the other team when they know what's coming is stupid and short-sighted. Eventually we'll need to know how to strategically and tactically beat or adjust to an opponent (like the Eagles in the playoffs last year). This is a weakness of Childress, and one that I think is influencing our ability to AD in a position to succeed. He's been looking too much like Leroy Hoard lately.

3) AD isn't as good as everyone thinks. There. I said it. The best RB in the NFL actually isn't the best RB in the NFL, and Emmit Smith was right when he said that he'd have to learn to be productive against 8-9 man fronts if he wanted to play for a championship. Maybe averaging 60-70 yards against such fronts is being productive, I don't know. All I know is that I believe this option is the least likely to be true, and that I frequently get frustrated by the lack of creativity and diversity in play calling and formation in putting AD in a position to succeed.

So, what do y'all think? Am I off base? Anybody else seeing/thinking what I'm thinking?

 

Lastly, my homer moment: we're hearing a lot about how the Vikes might not be so good because they've played such an easy schedule. I'll offer this up for consideration, courtesy of the good folks over at Footballoutsiders.com:

Through week 4, ranking of SOS of teams played:
Baltimore 3-1, 28th (or 4th easiest)

Pittsburgh 2-2, 26th (or 6th easiest)

Green Bay 2-2, 20th (or 12th easiest)

Minnesota 4-0, 29th (or 3rd easiest)

Poll
Biggest concern on offense going forward
O-line cohesion
22 votes
O-line health
16 votes
O-line talent
10 votes
Playcalling
22 votes
None of the above (leave comment)
7 votes

77 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.

0 recs  |  Comment 49 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

on point three

I think AD is the best player but any running back no matter how good he is; is still only as good as the OL. ANY rb hit behind or at the line is not going to be as productive. Most of AD’s runs that are great happen when the first hit is 5 yards past the line. Not at the line and then going for three yard gain because the loss of momentum gives the LB’s time to make the second hit. Good run blocking requires gaps at the line and People getting on LB’s so when the hits come the running back has the momentum. It concerns me that we seem to be giving up on the run to soon in games. These runnes will work in the 4th quarter. Looking at the stats and not seeing the game it almost seems like Chilly is trying to fool some teams into believing we are a pass first team. I hope that is the case, becuase we really need to be a run first team.

it is better to be thought of as dumb then to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Ben Franklin

by montana vikes fan on Oct 11, 2009 11:17 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That's whay i used to think

But really I would expect AD to pop one every once in a while unless Childress is being especially wiley and telling him to get tackled…

by Grime on Oct 12, 2009 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

a good O line makes an average running back look great

Example Larry Johnson got the big contract because he had a pro bowl offensive line in KC. Where are his big numbers on the stat lines now. since his linemen retired the following year he hasnt givin anything back to the team in regards to imposing his will on the defence and the only RB to do that may be Barry Sanders hmmmm so where do we rate Adrian ??? I would tend to believe he is a great running back as when the lanes do open he can make the secondary miss tackles and take it to the house.

by AHHHWoooooo on Oct 12, 2009 1:41 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Learning to pass block

Since we have not had a passing game for the last several years, the O Line worked on run blocking over and over and over again. I think they are working on pass blocking right now and we are seeing the dividends in the passing game. I really think in the 2nd have of the season we will see a renewed emphasis on the running game and it will take care of itself.

Skol Vikings

by SouthernNorseman on Oct 12, 2009 6:50 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Offense is based on 2 new O-Linemen

But as a team the biggest issue is pass coverage. Cohesion on O-Line and coverage are the only 2 issues that are even in the discussion for biggest concern. I think the

O-Line is more about having a 2nd year first time starting center and rookie RT. While not 100% together, the O-line is getting better every week and I only expect that trend to continue.

Pass coverage, particularly by safeties, but also a little in the play calling. The safeties seem to be mental, not physical ability. They seem to have a few plays every game where they bite on the wrong route resulting in a big pass play. The play calling to me is where we give up a TE route at bad times. I think we all know the results.

Now that I’ve said that I want to say this: If these two issues, at the level the Vikings have them, are the biggest issues on the team than we’re in pretty good shape. In the NFL teams always have room to improve. But, this is a damn good Vikings team.

by ChemErik on Oct 12, 2009 8:46 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

You have (eloquently) summarized my exact thoughts on every issue you address. As I said in another thread, in a salary capped, parity league, every team will have Achilles heels to some degree.

The only thing I might append to our comments, is that while these are my general impressions as well, I am still very much holding out final judgement until we face real tests (really good teams). The O line will have their “midterm” in 6 days against the Ravens, and the “finals” will without a doubt be the Giants in wk17 (assuming we are still playing for seeding then, and don’t rest starters, etc).

by puddnhead on Oct 12, 2009 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks god

the giants take on the Saints. Someone won’t be undefeated after next week.

by TheEvilProfessor on Oct 12, 2009 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

I feel like, if this keeps going, those are the two we will battling with for the bye (with da Bears as a dark, dark horse — but if they are in the hunt for the bye, then it will probbly mean we are out). So it’s good that one of them will go down next week :)

by puddnhead on Oct 12, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes, but

the bears have to play hotlanta in Atlanta.

by TheEvilProfessor on Oct 12, 2009 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This MIGHT be an important game for both teams

Home Field Advantage throughout the playoffs kind of important….

Little early yet, but might be another record whatever network is broadcasting….

Hope is already in the bag though, for Vikes of course!

I would rather be IN the Arena than watching from the stands...That is my life!
* Read Teddy Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" if you need further explanation...

by vikingfanfrom afar on Oct 13, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Playcalling. If you haven’t noticed, these past games where Peterson hasn’t been “doing as well” he hasn’t gotten very many carries either. The only bad game I’d say he’s had is the Green Bay game. If you look at his ypc average, however, it’s still very good. And I don’t mean his overall ypc average, because that takes the Cleveland game into account. I mean his average for those “bad” games. For GB he had a 2.2 average. But for this last one I’m pretty sure it was over 4 and close to 5.

by Frost on Oct 12, 2009 9:39 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Also, we haven’t had to rely on the running game so much because the passing game has been explosive. Which is what I want. We need to drill into opponents heads that we AREN’T just a running team so that they will prepare for a pass and Peterson can bust out some bigger gains. Or, conversely, if they want to just keep playing against Peterson, that’s fine too, because Favre’s shown he can still throw the ball.

by Frost on Oct 12, 2009 9:42 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw...

On the Favre highlight reel… a play where he popped up from under center, faked the quick out with a pump to his left, dropped back, faked the handoff to the RB, took more steps back then threw it downfield for a big gain (the big Rice gain).

I have to believe that we are (REALLY ARE!) playing OUR game… that is, scheming and taking what the defense is showing and exploiting it… I don’t think we can call this offense ‘vanilla’ anymore. We are seeing multiple looks from our offense, with play calling at the line of scrimmage, mis-leads, fakes, , etc.

I know this one play doesn’t represent our entire playbook, but it sent a message to me anyway… this isn’t our Vikings team from the last couple of years!

LINK

I BELIEVE...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 12, 2009 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Favre’s out there making the difference and the playbook is opening up. We have a bone fide passing game again :))))

Now if AP can get his mojo going as well, I don’t see how the opposing Ds can plan to cover it all. You can’t double-team everyone, lol.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Oct 13, 2009 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

4.6 ypc for peterson yesterday

Remember he sat in q4 though – Chester got nine carries, almost as many as AP. Q4 is where AP tends to break ’em, after wearing ’em down (see wk1).

Also I think we may need to start looking at his stats in a different way, as he maybe starts getting more balls on short passes. That only happened twice yesterday, but that was still > 10% of his touches, and 10% of his total yards. I’m thinking the %s will increase. Although being the #1 rusher or not is definitely a point of pride for a Viking fan, I ho[e we can keep the big picture that if he starts getting more of his total yards as YAC on short passes, that is just as good to the team (if not better).

by puddnhead on Oct 12, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

look at the games where

the vikes have played the 3-4 defenses, have we really run it up the middle? No. When playing a 3-4 defense, if you want to run it has to be up the middle. In a 4-3, you have only 1 LB there if you sell a fake. In a 4-3, it is always 2 LBs. Plus if your CB stays downs that is a lot of bodies exactly where AD is. The only reason I can think they aren’t running up the middle is because of poor run blocking by Sullivan. Either the coaches don’t feel comfortable with him run blocking or they call it and the hole never opens and then AD bounces outside into 2 LBs.

by TheEvilProfessor on Oct 12, 2009 9:43 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Ugh.

“Adrian’s rushed for the lowest yardage total through five games of his career while having the best QB play of his career.”

2009 First Five Games: 481 Yds. 7 TD 4.9 YPC

2008 First Five Games: 452 Yds 3 TD 4.3 YPC

Dude is averaging almost 5 yards a carry. The vikes or 5-0. The offense has scored the second most points in the entire league. People need to chill. AP does not need to run for 100+ Yards a game every game. He doesn’t need to. Its OK. He is still elite. Our offense is clicking just fine.

Bring on Baltimore!

by footballninja on Oct 12, 2009 11:13 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

I also get annoyed with the phrase – “run first team”. I tell the kids on my football team that if you want to be good, you have to be on a “win first team”. If that means running fine, if it means passing fine, if it means playing solid D and grinding out a low scoring win – fine. A win first team is a team that works on doing everything well, doesnt make mistakes and sacrifices the personal for the team.

We are the vikings.......resistance is futile.

by Hoss-Drone on Oct 12, 2009 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

+38

Whatever it takes to win a game – all aspects working together!

I BELIEVE...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 12, 2009 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we'll run more when we need to,

or when defenses start backing off. I’m not a big Peter King fan, but I thought he summed it up pretty well in his column this morning:

“Defenses keep challenging Adrian Peterson by clogging the box. Favre keeps completing 70 percent.”

As long as that’s the case, and as long as we keep winning, then there is really no reason to do anything else. As much as I’d like to see AD racking up more yards, the fact is that NFL running backs have a pretty limited shelf life. Peterson may not be anywhere near his expiration date yet, but there is no reason to hasten it unnecessarily. And he continues to contribute to our offense by simply lining up in the backfield.

We’ll see some big games from him at times this season, and in the meantime we should be overjoyed that we don’t NEED one from him every game. He’ll be that much more ready when the time comes.

by Migrant lurker on Oct 12, 2009 11:36 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t believe AD is as dominant as advertised. Let’s face facts, folks: Running backs by the time they reach the NFL are about as good as the line blocking for them. Look any sound running game over the history of the NFL and I’ll show you an above-average offensive line. It’s that simple.

Also, before we get too carried away one way or the other, take this into account: The rankings of defenses Minny has faced thus far:

Cleveland Browns – 29th (32nd against the rush)
St. Louis Rams – 23rd (23rd against the rush)
Detroit Lions – 22nd (21st against the rush)
Green Bay Packers – 18th (20th against the rush)
San Francisco 49ers – 16th (8th against the rush)

So, the last two weeks, AD has been shut down by the 20th and 23rd ranked rushing defenses in the NFL. The only possible excuse can be that this is by design to prevent wear and tear and/or to get Brett more involved in the passing game. I don’t buy it.

I guess based on Brett’s and the WR corps’ progression, it isn’t as big a deal. But, there will come a day when Minnesota MUST run the ball to win and lets hope it isn’t in the playoffs.

I think obviously losing Birk was huge. If not, then all of the blame would go to Loadholt, which obviously cannot be because he doesn’t block the left side of the line.

Next week won’t be an ultimate test because while Baltimore is 5th against the rush, they’re pretty dreadful against the pass at 24. On offense, they’re 10th in passing and 6th in rushing.

So, I’m not sure the rushing problems have anything to do with play calling. Isn’t there something continually preached in the NFL about execution? It’s either O-line talent, or execution and I’m not buying the execution piece.

by Hauschild on Oct 12, 2009 11:46 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

O-Line gets the first 4 yards in most cases, the RB gets the rest

I’d say at an NFL level, the O-Line is critical for getting the first 4 yards on most plays, but a good RB turns those good blocks into big gains instead of 3-5 yard gains fairly frequently. That’s why we see many great RB’s get several short carries and then suddenly break one. When they get enough blocks they only need to make one guy miss they uses speed, power, and/or agility to make a big play.

by ChemErik on Oct 12, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The RB coment is partially based on flawed logic

1. If you have a good RB, he can make your line look better. (the reverse is also true)
2. Having a good RB go against your D will make your run D look worse than it is.

The only way to really assess a RB is to look at individual plays. Did he find the hole? Did he break that extra tackle? etc. It’s a pain in the @$$, but reality. That run against CLE was the best run I have ever seen either in person or on tape. That run showed a complete skillset all in one play. There are not many backs in the NFL now or past that could do that.

I think our running problems have been because of Sullivan not being up to snuff on the run block, which is why we weren’t running off guard against the 3-4 defenses which is how you have to run against them. (sadly this is what the ravens play). We need a big game from Sully.

by TheEvilProfessor on Oct 12, 2009 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I get what you're saying

My statement was a reply to the statement about a RB at the NFL level not being that important, but the O-Line. While I see the O-line as being more important for the grind it out type of runs I think the RB is the one who make big plays happen in most cases. I’ll stand by what I said as a rule of thumb (right on about 4/5 plays). But, you’re right that it can’t be applied to ALL plays.

by ChemErik on Oct 12, 2009 1:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My response

was meant for Hauschild and agree for your basic theory. Big plays usually don’t happen because of the line…poor line play merely prevents them from ever happening.

by TheEvilProfessor on Oct 13, 2009 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dear God chill out

AD was 2nd in NFL rushing his 1st year, 1st last year, and is 2nd this year by about 40 yards. As noted earlier he is averaging about 5 yards a carry and has 7 TD through 5 games. RELAX! Our offense is producing 31 points per game! That is outstanding! Although seeing 28 bust off 60-yard runs is fun, seeing Rice, Harvin, Shiancoe, BB and the gang catch TD passes is just as good! Trust me, AD is still the best RB in the league.

by Jepp The Viking on Oct 12, 2009 12:20 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

the Vikings will beat you by ground or air…
Choose your poison.

GO VIKES!!

I BELIEVE...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 12, 2009 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

don't forget that he's STILL 3rd in league for YPG this year

Even with all the additional passing, defensive takeaways which keep offense off field (we are #1 in turnovers), and him sitting in the last quarter like he did yesterday. Yes, he is still #2 in average yards per game.

My god, I never thought in a million years we’d have a thread this year arguing that our running game is letting us down!!!

by puddnhead on Oct 12, 2009 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

Have not forgotten….when a team has SOOOO much talent, the individuals may or may not have to have a big night…

In spite of the day after coaching comments by all, overall we did have a good game (a W)….a;so I am sure we will not let down any for next week, and know what has to be done…and sure we will get it done….

Overall as has been pointed out in this post by many, AD is fine….and judging by his comments after the game (see post below by you) we do not have to worry about any pouting by him for not getting so many carries in a game….is all about team and the W!

SKOL!

I would rather be IN the Arena than watching from the stands...That is my life!
* Read Teddy Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" if you need further explanation...

by vikingfanfrom afar on Oct 12, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

O-Line is to slow

I’ve been struggling for four weeks now trying to figure are run game out. I think I have it. This O-Line is slow off of the run block. AD is so fast to the hole that no gaps are created for him. Thats why all his big runs have been stop at the line and change direction plays.

He gets to the line to fast. My first thought was that the O-line was being taught not to push to far down field in order that Farve could throw a quick screen on a run play but that has only happened once so far. AP is going to have to adjust his style to this O-Line. I don’t think the Line can get better against the upcoming D-Lines we will be facing.

Even with two tight ends we can’t seem to make the blocks necessary for runs between the tackles. I don’t think the problem is AP. I think it is either lack of talent or lack of execution on the O-Line.

by lifelongvike on Oct 12, 2009 1:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Fortunately, AP has his focus right (even if not all his fans do):

Vikings RB Adrian Peterson: ‘I don’t have to run for 150 yards now’

ST. LOUIS — Adrian Peterson rushed 15 times for 69 yards and two touchdowns in a 38-10 victory over the Rams on Sunday. Even though for the fourth week in a row he failed to crack the 100-yard barrier, Peterson wore a big smile as he talked to Sporting News’ Dennis Dillon and other reporters after Minnesota raised its record to 5-0.

Q: You had some good runs today, you got some yards.
Peterson: (Laughs.) Yeah, I was able to contribute in the end zone a couple times. And that helped contribute to a Vikings win.

Q: Opponents aren’t stacking the box as much in ‘09. Is that a nice byproduct of Brett Favre being able to pass?
Peterson: Oh, yeah, it’s real nice. And it’s going to get even better. Right now, we’re enjoying how we’re winning. A lot of different guys are touching the ball. And it just feels good that it’s not all about the running game. I don’t have to run for 150 yards now. Our offense is totally different. We have so many playmakers who can make plays and so many ways we can beat people.

Q: Some of the load is off your shoulders with this offense. Is that a good thing?
Peterson: Yeah, it’s a good thing. I get a lot of questions about “Are you frustrated about the run game — 50 yards here, 60 yards there?” I’ve said all along if we go into a game and come out with 60 or 80 yards rushing as a group and we get a “W,” I’m excited. I’m happy. That’s what it’s all about — being able to play balanced and being able to have different guys on offense contribute to a win.

Q: How about defensive end Jared Allen’s touchdown on a 52-yard fumble return?
Peterson: That was real nice. He’s got some pretty good speed.

Q: How does it feel to be undefeated?
Peterson: It feels real good. We’re going to enjoy it tonight and get ready for a big game at home next Sunday against Baltimore.

by puddnhead on Oct 12, 2009 1:50 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Thank you!

Awesome article, thanks for sharing it here :)

It’s great to see that AP’s head is in the right place and that things are coming together as well as many of us had been hoping. Between AP, CT, Harvin, Berrian, Rice, Shanko, and Lewis… that’s an awful lot of offensive weapons for Favre to choose between, and to be fair, each one of them deserves a chance to contribute. Favre’s even giving some love to Tahi!

Heh, and that’s just the start, the guys sitting behind them are all very promising too. Jaymar, Darius, Al Young…. you gotta be excited about this Vikings team, the level of quality is outstanding.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Oct 13, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Does anyone else think Favre telegraphs run plays?

I can tell when we’re running the ball before the running back even gets the ball because of the way Favre hands off the ball on run plays.

by Loki The Viking God on Oct 12, 2009 3:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I see AD like I saw Moss

Moss was great, but what he really did is made room for Chris Carter and Robert Smith. With a marque player on the field the other players will be better. Becasue they have to respect that one player every down of the game. So having AD in the backfield even if he touches the ball only once for no gain still makes everyone elses game improve.

I think as teams get tired of being beaten by the pass they will start having to send people after shianco, Favre and Rice. As soon as they start respecting that it will be time to let AD loose. Think about it a team that spends the week looking at how they can stop the pass isn’t going to be as well prepared to stop the run. It will average out in the end.

As well I like that we are passing early getting our feel for the receivers down now during the easy part of our schedule. Later when people respect that (and favre gets a bit more tired) we can come back to our run and keep on working them.

by Grime on Oct 12, 2009 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

curious postulation...

I have seen plays where it looks like #4 is taking several steps with the ball out at the end of his arm to hand it off.
Seems to me that would be due to the fact that we are not trying to run it inside.

I don’t know… but I don’t think #4 telegraphs anything unintentionally! If you catch my drift.

I BELIEVE...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 12, 2009 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Favres been doing that for a looong time.

I’ve never seen him do a play action pass when he’s extended out with the football ever in my memory.

by stratoscaster on Oct 12, 2009 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Although

I think you are right to an extent. Mike Morris commented the other morning that Sullivan is getting pushed around too much in the middle and that is making it difficult for them to run between the tackles. In fact he called out the entire offensive line, saying that they needed to raise their physicalness if this team wanted to reach the Superbowl (physicalness like how the 49ers D was physical).

"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."

by biggity2bit on Oct 13, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have

several times. Be patient.

TiggerSr

by TiggerSr on Oct 13, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Peterson didn't have big holes last year either.

Which just proves how great Peterson is. I remember seeing the line completely stuffed constantly last year. It used to piss me off all the time. I live in Atlanta so I got to see Turner run through massive holes all season long. If AP gets a big whole, he explodes through it and handles the defensive backfield. The Cleveland run would have been a 20 yard tops run for all of the other good backs in the league.

With the way defenses play against us, AP will always be boom or bust and that is the same way it was last year. If you only give him 15 carries instead of 30 he has a 50% less chance of the boom which is what pushes those stats up. Our stats at this point don’t really reflect our talent at RB or defense.

It has been very clear this season that showing how good we can be on all cylinders and all game is not a priority. Winning is the priority. The only thing we have to prove is that we can pass the ball. NOs is trying to prove how great their defense is now. Baltimore is trying to prove how great their offense is this year. These teams have to worry that they have peaked early, we don’t.

http://vikingsmashfootball.wordpress.com/

by BeardedAxe on Oct 12, 2009 7:20 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good post puddinhead

AP does NOT have to get 100 yds or more every game..Defenses trying to shutdown AP no longer shuts down the Vikings offense…AP is a team player..He knows that defenses have to pick their poison now…..I am concerned about how many long runs and wide open pass plays our defense has given up so far this year, but that is a diff subject for a diff post…….GO VIKINGS !!!!

by WVVikings on Oct 12, 2009 7:29 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Agree To Disagree ...

Well, I appreciate the responses, but I have to remain steadfast in my belief that something is amiss with the Vike’s running game. Even if AD isn’t the second coming, it doesn’t matter – not even Barry Sanders could do much better.

There simply are not an adequate number of open running lanes being created, and while I can understand defenses keeping 8 and 9 in the box, that doesn’t explain the entire story because Favre is carving up secondaries, and if defenses continue to get punched in the face, they eventually drop the safeties back.

Anyhow, it’s not like I am saying the Vikings are in trouble and they suck. I am saying – as a guy who has studied the Packers successes and failures since 1992 RELIGIOUSLY – if an RB and O-line are as highly touted as AD and the Vikings’ O-line and you see such a nigh number of negative rushing yards plays and defenders are continually finding penetration, the self-evident truths are obviously not true.

And, again, this alarmingly high penetration is coming from some real shabby run defenses. If another month goes by and the Vikes continue to win regardless, then my assertions were basically pointless. I guess we’ll have to see how it goes.

by Hauschild on Oct 12, 2009 10:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Most of the responses have been addressing AP, rather than the O-line, and in that I think the consensus is accurate- that AP is doing fine with what he has.

But the O-line itself is another issue, and there’s been questions there all season so far. Sully being new at C and Load being a rookie, even they’re doing great, it’s a relative thing. They’re doing great for newbs at their positions. I don’t know if that answers the questions because, to be honest, I think our O-line has had issues earlier than that, even when we had Birk. Everyone talks about what a stud Hutch and McKinney are, but I’m not seeing it, even when Birk was here.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Oct 13, 2009 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Proof is this week

Baltimore is a big time Blitzing team. Teams can run on them. The O-Line can stink or shine. They need to pass block, run block, pick up the blitz. Will we keep AP back for pass protection or put Chester in for that? Will Brett finally burn someone with a quick slant play. Can the O-Line really open up a hole?
School is out and its time to play. No more hiding the playbook Chilly. Get this team fired up and have them BLOCK someone. The defense must solve the open middle of the field problem and the line must open a hole.

We have been building for this game for 5 weeks. I am already anticipating this one.

GO VIKES!!!!

by lifelongvike on Oct 13, 2009 7:08 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Agree on all points

Great game preview in a nutshell.

TiggerSr

by TiggerSr on Oct 13, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

O-Line Observations

At the start of the year i mentioned that I thought the O line had become so run oriented they could not find the balance between that and the shift to pass blocking mode. They seem to have gotten better at pass blocking and with 2 new guys on the line there are some things to work on as far as opening holes for AP.
I don’t think your comments are off and I often think (and revert to a Dave osborne interview) that AP could generate more yardage by not hesitating to find a hole that may not open and pound it out when it is not there. It is what he does. He is a master at giving his line time to open something up and then breaking for the big one. Problem is those holes are not there as much and he needs to use some of his power to make them himself, which he has not mastered.
Don’t get me wrong, I love AP but we forget he is still a young pro. Teams are figuring his weak areas and this may be the learning curve year for him to make some adjustments. If a big hole isn’t there slam through the smaller one. If you get some people to miss on pure speed and get beyond the stacked line you are off to the races.
I know they are 2 different sports bu tthe issue is taking a new approach. As a HS soccer player I was good. But, I always wanted to play it the fancy way and try to make or find an opening to run right at the keeper or create a big hole. Iwasn’t doing well and my coach told me why are you waiting to make the easy shot when there is a gap 3 feet wide. Hit that hole and shoot , no one will expect it. They have you marked to do something. Do something different. Two days later I set a school record for most goals in one game.
There are similarities. If D lines and hole plugging LB’s are waiting for searching AP to hit a big hole, that can be a disadvantage. I have seen him rush some small gaps and pick up 5-7 yds. Ozzie made a statement similar that he thought AP could turn a 80 yd performance into a plus 100 with just smashing at some people one in awhile. It was not a knock. Just an honest evaluation from a guy who didn’t have the moves. Strong but not as strong as AP.
It made sense.
AP will be fine. When this line matures and jells together, watch out. Hey, they are 5-0 and can only get better.

by CitrusFLViking on Oct 13, 2009 11:23 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!
Start posting about the Vikings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dodge_front_small
Comparing '98 to '09, Defense
Vikings_logo_small
FOX wants to nickname the Vikings defensive line
Dodge_front_small
Good-Bye, Bad-Bye

Recent FanPosts

Vyke_small
IF...
Throwdpeterson_small
Brett Favre, The 40-Year-Old Version: 'It's amazing,' says sack king Michael Strahan
Viking_flag_small
The Beginning of the End
Vikings_small
Place Your Bets...Cutler
Vikings_small
Place Your Bets...Rodgers
Throwdpeterson_small
Quick Fun: Vote: Best Favre Photo!
Percy-harvin_small
Greatest Picks Part 2 (56-09)
Small
We have built it, they will come
Throwdpeterson_small
Update: More Videos! ENJOY!
Small
Iraqi Militants Are Favre Fans???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Bleeding Green Nation
Eagles shuffle linebackers again
Big Blue View
Antonio Pierce out indefinitely
Arrowhead Pride
Friday Night Open Thread

Head Coach

Dailynorseman_small Gonzo

Coordinators

Me_at_the_vikings_game_small ericj69

Childress_small Anthony21