Statistically Speaking, Vikings Look Solid
I'm not a big stats guy, but even a fella like me can look at the statistical leaderboards after five weeks and see that the Vikings are excelling in multiple facets of the game. A quick glance at the numbers:
- Among quarterbacks, Brett Favre is third in the league in completion percentage (69.1%) with just Ben Roethlisberger and Peyton Manning in front of him. His 104.1 quarterback rating places him at fourth in the league. Our pal across the border, Aaron Rodgers? Well, at least he's leading the league in something (sacks). If you thought Favre's protection was a little lacking, consider that Rodgers has been sacked nearly twice as much as Favre has (20 vs. 11). And that's with Green Bay taking last weekend off. I greatly enjoy the fact that the Mullet is single-handedly responsible for nearly 25% of those sacks.
- We've talked about Adrian Peterson's quiet games against the Packers and Rams, but AD is still second in the league in rushing yards. His 481 yards put him six yards behind the pace-setter, Cedric Benson. AD leads all running backs with seven rushing touchdowns.
- On the defensive side, E.J. Henderson's 41 tackles put him in 10th place in the league. Jared Allen is in second place on the sack leaderboard, trailing Antwan Odom and Elvis Dumervil (who have eight sacks each) with 6.5 sacks. Allen and Chad Greenway are also among 11 players who have recovered two or more fumbles this season, and the Mullet has forced three fumbles. The numbers justify the early MVP talk.
- The Steal Of The Draft (Percy Harvin) has proven himself to be a lethal kickoff returner, and the stats back that up. His 31.2 yards-per-return average puts him in second place in the league. Darius Reynaud, who has missed the last two games, is averaging 17.3 per punt return -- also good enough for second in the NFL. The guy he was replaced with, Jaymar Johnson? Three returns, averaging 18.0 yards apiece.
- Points per game? The Vikings are third in the league with an average of 31.2. If you would have told me this time last season that the Vikes would be one of the highest-scoring offenses in 2009 -- after the first five weeks, at least -- there's absolutely no way I would have believed you. Just as important as the points-per-game average is the turnover differential (+8). Your Vikings lead the league in that category.
Anything I missed? Give me a shout in the comments.
1 recs |
51 comments
|
Comments
Fasten your seatbelts...
… we will all get to see if those Kick-A statistics translate into wins over the next three weeks.
In turn, let’s hope Ray Lewis doesn’t decapitate one of our WRs
by solafide on Oct 12, 2009 6:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh the beauty of the numbers
This years team looks pretty solid all the way around. We have a few weak points, but that being said, I believe this is the best all around team we have fielded maybe ever, or at least since the 70’s. SKOL VIKINGS!
I believe all Viking fans must be masochistic!!
by BSUvikFAN on Oct 12, 2009 6:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Does anybody else think so?
I wasn’t around back then but I would love to see the Vikings of my time to be remembered among the best.
by loafrat on Oct 12, 2009 7:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not even close.
But it doesn’t matter because very few NFL teams match the best teams of the 70’s these days. They don’t have to be that good. It’s a product of free agency and a talent pool diluted by expansion, if you ask me.
Personally, I don't give a crap about Brett Favre.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Oct 12, 2009 7:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
If you mean a team that inspires confidence in it’s fans… that it could and should beat it’s competition on any given Sunday (Mondays, Thursdays, and sometimes on Saturdays)… then I think this team is getting close.
the 70’s were made up of solid defensive play and a balanced run/pass offense.
So regardless of what TSSC thinks of his division rival… yeah… they are looking that good at this point in the season!
GO VIKES!!
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 12, 2009 7:41 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
The Confidence Is The Same
You just knew the Vikings were going to win in the 70’s….The days of the Black and Blue Division, Fran, Purple People Eaters, etc….Week in and week out, you felt the guys would do it, no matter the circumstance…Loved the games, hated the SB losses from those years….Ahhhhhhh (note STILL a fan though, and that always!)…
Now is even harder to get to the SB let alone win one (many reasons), but personally I am to the point where yes, they can get there, and yes, I write that knowing they have “issues” to address (I think excellent teams are “works in progress”)….Things could have gone better against the teams so far, we could have kept our A team in and maybe stopped some of the passing yards, and perhaps 7 pts on Sunday….BUT
Based on the Ws (most important statistic), the talent (borne out by the OTHER statistics mentioned), they Vikings are in their way – building strengths from week to week, changing the in progress game plan as required (isn;t it nice they can do this effectively????), and coming back in the second half (wow something that used to be no go), and yes even that last few second victory over Niners (again never would have happened with TJ or Rosencopter)….
They are ready for the big time….I know and feel that we have a very good chance of beating the next three opponents…This team believes in themselves and has the talent and will to carry through. If they DO lose, so not believe it will destroy that belief, just make them MORE determined….
This is a fun year, let’s all kick back and enjoy….such a season is once in a blue moon it seems….If they lose a game, ok…stand up keep marching….BUT they may not just yet….If they do get through these next three weeks undefeated, they can use that breather to recoup and charge out to secure the division initially, then home field advantage…A little early, let’s see…
SKOL!
I would rather be IN the Arena than watching from the stands...That is my life!
* Read Teddy Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" if you need further explanation...
by vikingfanfrom afar on Oct 12, 2009 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
While I am on the Soapbox....
I really hope that the state of MN gets the stadium issue taken care of sooner….there is no later…NFL teams are still a business…What we have now just will not cut it longer…
The “LA Vikings” just does not sound right, and there is no way I could continue to support them if that happened…Do not even want to contemplate this…Not sure what I would do….
The Vikings are a part of MN lore much like hunting, fishing, log cabins, Paul Bunyon, Smoky the Bear, and the gigantic rectal thermemeter in Smoky Bear Park in Int’l Falls (Icebox of the Nation)…Well all but that last one anyway LOL…
GO VIKINGS!
I would rather be IN the Arena than watching from the stands...That is my life!
* Read Teddy Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" if you need further explanation...
by vikingfanfrom afar on Oct 12, 2009 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I believe...
…why not make it to the big dance? The pieces are in place and the Vikes are due!
by solafide on Oct 12, 2009 9:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comparing Stadiums
Even though I’ve been A Vikings fan all my life (military brat), I went to my first Vikes home game last Monday (I know great timing for the 1st one). Awesome game, but man the Metrodome is looking rough. Living in AZ, when I compare it to the Cardinals stadium, it isn’t even close. The Cardinals stadium is far superior. What’s sad is that the Cardinal’s stadium wasn’t designed to be over the top either (yeah Jerry, I’m talking to you). I’d hate to see the Vikes leave Minnesota, but the reality is that the Metrodome is a dog. Great team, crappy stadium.
by AFTP on Oct 13, 2009 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed!
The Barrel Cactus is a beautiful stadium. Hopefully, the fans in MN get something similar.
AFTP, where are you in AZ?
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 13, 2009 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cave Creek
Cave Creek, just North of Phoenix
by AFTP on Oct 14, 2009 1:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Barrel Cactus?
I thought it was supposed to look like a coiled snake?
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
by DCPurple on Oct 15, 2009 7:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
from the stadium's website...
Design
* University of Phoenix Stadium was designed to be a truly multi-purpose facility with the ability to host football, basketball, soccer, concerts, consumer shows, motorsports, rodeos and corporate events.
* Designed by world-renowned architect Peter Eisenman, in conjunction with HOK Sport, Hunt Construction Group and Urban Earth Design.
* 14 – Number of new NFL venues HOK has designed.
* The exterior skin represents a barrel cactus.
* The building features alternating sections of shimmering metal panels intended to reflect the shifting desert light alongside magnificent vertical glass slots allowing patrons a spectacular view of the horizon from any level of the exterior. There are 21 vertical slots on the exterior wall of the stadium.
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 15, 2009 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too early to tell
I think everyone thinks things were better/tougher when they were a kid, and it’s tough for me to believe that any playoff team the Vikings have fielded from the 80’s on would be better than the Purple People Eaters from the late 60’s and 70’s, even the vaunted 5-0 2009 team. True, the PPE never won a Super Bowl, but they are still one of the most talented collection of football players in NFL history.
And the 2009 team is only 5 games in. I think it’s a little early to do the compare and contrast game.
"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."
--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre
by MilCardFan on Oct 12, 2009 11:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was around back then
“Best” is a relative term. Kind of depends on what precisely you are asking. If today’s team played the Vikes’ team of ‘75, who would win? Is that what you are asking? To answer that, one would want to know more — indoors our outside, snow or good weather, today’s rules or 1975 rules. Even then, today’s athletes seem faster, stronger, and more powerful.
But if what you are asking is how today’s team compares against its competition in the NFL this year versus how the Vikes of, say, 1975 comnpared to its competition in that year, it really isn’t close. Before free agency, the disparity of talent among teams was much wider. The Vikes, Steelers, Cowboys, 49ers, Rams, Redskins, Chiefs, Raiders, Dolphins always seemed to be good; the Saints, Lions, Packers, Bears, Giants, Eagles, Cardinals, Falcons, Patriots always seemed to be mediocre at best.
The Vikes of the early-to-mid 1970’s dominated because they were so good and there were very few really good teams. That is not the case any more. Teams can change their pedigree over the course of 1-2 years — sometimes even during the course of a season. The talent level is so much more even now. That makes all the other myriad variables more important as a result, which makes it harder for one team to dominate.
Hey, 5-0 is great in any year, in any decade. Enjoy it.
What I enjoyed most about the Vikes of the 70’s — watching the domination of our defensive line.
What I enjoy most about this team — watching AP break open runs that remind everyone of Jim Brown; watching Favre dissect a defense with his arm better than any other QB in Vikes history (Kramer and Moon came close at times); watching Harvin and Rice catch Favre’s bullets with their hands (a la Cris Carter); and Allen pressuring the QB (a la Page and Eller). It’s just fun to watch.
TiggerSr
by TiggerSr on Oct 13, 2009 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep!
I would rather be IN the Arena than watching from the stands...That is my life!
* Read Teddy Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" if you need further explanation...
by vikingfanfrom afar on Oct 13, 2009 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Comments re: Perspective on Vikes in the 70's - I was around also
I left the Twin Cities in 1977 for Texas just 2 yrs after the Best Vikes Team of that era (Drew Pearson and Roger rained on that parade)…I agree with earlier comments about why the Vikings dominated in that time period…it was also a period where the players stayed together for LONG PERIODS..like 10 yr average of some of Vikes best players..
My wife took me (from Houston – where NFL has been a joke) to Mpls on Oct 5th and we had 20 yd line lower level seats…IT WAS THE BEST Viking game in decades…what a blast! – I was a big fan of Fran the Man and he had his contribution to the NFL, but Brett has proven to be better over time…would be interesting to compare 3rd down conversion ratios..Fran’s was pretty high…but that is secondary…
Whatever happens this year..the fact is: There are a lot of cities that would love to be excited about NFL football and regardless of SB victories, the Vikings have provided their fan base with a very competitive team over the long haul. SKOL
by bobo_ on Oct 14, 2009 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Honestly trying to compare the two is an apples and oranges thing, the entire make up of the NFL and players is so different. Back in the ‘70s, one thing you were always sure of, year after year, is that the Vikings were in the hunt for the Super Bowl. That was never in question. I can understand TSSC’s angst, his Packers were one of the teams that you could be sure that, year after year, would again be one of the NFL whipping boys.
I also think that today’s athletes are bigger, stronger, and faster, than the guys of yesteryear, and with the parity, they’re performing against tougher opposition on the average.
More than that, game itself has evolved to a level of sophistication that would leave the football players of the 1950s shaking their heads in disbelief. The schemes and counter-schemes, the theories and ‘tricks’ that are now SOP are so far beyond the early game that you sometimes wonder how good one of the old legends would be if he were suddenly transported through time into today’s game. There’s a substantial difference between the 70s and now, too.
What’s most important is that today, by today’s standards, we have a great group of players who are, at this time, a very good football team. They’re still improving each week and by the end of the year, they may transition from ‘very good’ to ‘great’, as a team. If that happens, this could be the year, and how appropriate would that be?!? The Vikings 50th Anniversary!
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
by DCPurple on Oct 15, 2009 7:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Other stats
0 or 1: the number of quality opponents out of five.
17th: This is roughly what the passing defense ranks after facing maybe 1 good QB, maybe 2 if one were to round up with Brady Quinn.
I do think that the offense is finally for real this year, but we should be seeing dominant numbers vs. the teams the Vikings have played, not slightly below average numbers. It’s fine to celebrate JA’s sack total so far, but it doesn’t mean much unless he can pull off a hat trick vs. Baltimore and/or Pittsburgh because our d-backs are getting beat every week.
That said, I was glad to finally see Tyrell Johnson make a couple of great plays vs. the nobody Rams.
by KC Viking on Oct 12, 2009 10:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Flip side of the equation
Yes, we’ve played an easy schedule, but according to footballoutsiders.com the strength of schedule of the next three teams we’re facing hasn’t been hard either. (Ranking is 1st is hardest, 32nd is easiest schedule faced so far).
Vikings-29th (very easy)
Baltimore-28th (very easy)
Pittsburgh-26th (very easy)
Green Bay-20th (easy)
Let’s keep our ‘easy’ schedule in perspective. Everyone loves the Giants but they’ve played an easier schedule than us (30th). These next three games are as much a test for our opponents as they are for us. Pretenders and contenders will be separated.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Oct 13, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know what you mean
I personally think that the Saints, Colts, Ravens, Giants, Eagles, Jets and Patriots are at least as good as the Vikings who could easily be 4-1 right now.
by KC Viking on Oct 13, 2009 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is my main concern, also. Our pass defense, while better than last year’s, at least, is still very suspect, imho. I’m really worried about it. Hopefully it continues to build on its strengths and improve while locking down the opposing passing attack or we’re definitely in for a few losses down the road.
Any Vikings’ fan should have two main concerns about the team down the road – Favre remaining un-hurt AND our Pass Defense’s shakiness at times.
I feel like we can definitely win both Baltimore and Pittsburgh games but it’s going to be really hard work. The worrisome part is that even if we do pull out those victories, it may leave us beat up and exhausted for the Packer’s game – and I know I speak for all of us Viking fans when I say that’s a game we’d rather win out of all 3 games (solely from a rivalry perspective).
by Wytefang on Oct 13, 2009 7:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good teams usually rank low on pass defense
because the opposing team is passing to catch up. 2 passing tds, along with about 150 yards of passing offense came with the second team line and Dbs on the field.
Jared Allen is to football what Jason Voorhees is to Lake Crystal.
Percy Harvin is Devin Hester, except someone very smart decided to teach him how to catch and run routes.
by SDviking on Oct 12, 2009 10:19 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes, yes, but ...
The Steelers had the #1 pass defense last year. And they were the champs. I don’t quite agree with your theory because good teams don’t play a prevent defense that allows an opposing offense to rack up big passing yards to get back in the game. Also, consider that both the Rams and Packers were moving the ball up and down the field with relative ease against us ALL game, not just in the fourth quarter. The only reason their point totals were as low as they were was because they kept turning the ball over in the red zone.
by Sheldon on Oct 13, 2009 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
DEFENSE
Our defense has also been very good this season. Often the stats rankings go by yards given up, where our D has been only average. But they have been very good in some key categories.
I have an unofficial stat for you. 52. Number of points our defense has given up during the competitive portions of the games. (I don’t count punt return, FG return, or fumble return TD’s. I don’t count points scored in the 4th quarter when the Vikes were up more than a score). That means our defensive unit on average is allowing the team to score 10 or 11 points per game outside of garbage time at the end. Special teams scores and the strip 6 by green bay were the only things keeping 3 of our games from being complete blowouts in my opinion.
We’ve hemoraged yards and scores in the 4th quarter this season but usually those came with the team up by 3 scores. Even the late scores by Green Bay were somewhat garbage time seeing as though they never possessed the ball with an opportunity to at least tie in the 4th quarter. If the Vikings can stop giving up cheap scores and maybe instead get those scores for themselves we can really dominate.
by Sand0 on Oct 13, 2009 7:54 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
excellent points
When Adrian Peterson is tossing his shoes into the stands with a big smile on his face before the game is over, it doesn’t matter if the other team scores. That only counts in the stats books; it’s not relevant football.
by peterplaysbass on Oct 13, 2009 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the new stat
But I’m also interested in seeing how this defense will perform against an offense like Baltimore or Pittsburgh because I have a feeling those two teams won’t shoot themselves in the foot in the red zone like our previous two opponents. Keep in mind that we allowed 400 yards to the Rams, and far too many of those came before the fourth quarter. If we hadn’t been the recipient of so many turnovers (especially against the Rams), the other teams’ point totals could have been much higher.
by Sheldon on Oct 13, 2009 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not worried about the rams game
Those yards don’t bother me all that much. Whether they’ll admit it or not the Vikings were a little flat after those past two weeks knowing that the Rams are so terrible all we had to do was show up.
Plus, if you look at what the Rams have done this season, typically it works in your favor to let them have yards and squeak out first downs. Eventually they turn it over. That’s been their MO all season.
by Sand0 on Oct 14, 2009 7:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus
The team just looks good in its games. Forget about the stats. The Vikings look like they are much more in control during games than their opponents who always seem teetering on the edge of disaster.
by Sand0 on Oct 13, 2009 7:57 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I noticed that “more in control” feeling too. Except for special teams…I still cringe a little, an illness I haven’t shaken from last year’s debacle yet.
by cutlassbob on Oct 13, 2009 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tough to get over
A season like last year with special teams TD’s. Those cost us two games. They almost cost us the 49ers game though Harvin did get one too in that one.
It just seems that minus a few risky tosses by Brett the Vikings are just taking less risks offensively while still scoring heavily. It is no wonder our turnovers are low and margins are high.
by Sand0 on Oct 14, 2009 7:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rushing TDs allowed
Thanks in part to a staunch goal line defense, we have not given up a rushing TD yet…pretty amazing stat through 5 games.
by timeloop13 on Oct 13, 2009 8:03 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
defense
we haven’t played up to what we can play,we can dominate on that side of the ball if the coaches do there job with preperation and players execute.and i get tired of hearing about who you have played were not the nfl we don’t make those decisions we play who we play was looking at the jets scheadule it’s easy to 20 of there wins against not good teams,its across the league.about the teams from the 70’s too young think god but have seen all the film and there wasn’t nearly as many rules and regulations as now not saying they weren’t better just have to put the 2009 vikes in the conversation if they get to the super bowl.
by clinton p on Oct 13, 2009 8:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This week against Baltimore is huge.
The Ravens are better than any team the Vikes have played so far. They are solid all the way around(except maybe WR) and are coming off a tough last second loss to the Bengals.
The Vikings are more than capable of winning, but they can’t give up that crucial special teams mistake against the Ravens and expect to win. Our run D will face a stern test against emerging Ray Rice & CO. I like our o-line this week, they are getting better and if they give Favre time its over.
Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!
by VikesPma on Oct 13, 2009 1:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
solid? Nah, their center is a bum...
…just kidding.
by peterplaysbass on Oct 13, 2009 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trash Talking is Heating Up at Baltimore Beatdown
There’s some wounded animals over there … they are looking at this game as key to their playoff hopes.
None
by BothTeamsOnSameSidelineOldSchoolVikesFan on Oct 13, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You have to figure they're desperate for a win
After losing a couple heartbreakers in a row, the Ravens are going to be a tough team to beat, even in our building. I think the key to this game is our defense. If we don’t get our pass defense corrected (coverage has been way too soft in the last couple games), we very easily could lose this one. I still think we’ll find a way, though.
by Sheldon on Oct 13, 2009 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
heartbreakers na they only blame themselves.lol oh wait they blame the refs
the ravens are a good team but have way too many unsportsmanlike penalties at the end of games so don’t be surprised if they do another foolish thing to help us.o-line teams have gotten pressure on flacco and if jared and ray can he is like any other pocket passer gets him out of his comfort zone.
by clinton p on Oct 13, 2009 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I gotta give a thumbs up for anyone who tells Brady to take off his skirt and put on a pair of pants.
by Salty on Oct 13, 2009 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great test for another reason
All season team have loaded the box to stop AD and Brett has burned them. Baltimore has too much pride in their D to leave the back end unmanned just because they can’t stop the run.
At least early on I think AD will periodically get 7 man looks up front. They’ll probably mix it up and try to mask things and what not but we’ll get to see a D try to stop our run game without “cheating”.
And if All Day is as good as we think he is, they’ll be loading that sucker up by halftime!
by Sand0 on Oct 14, 2009 7:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Link
I really didn’t expect so many similarities
by cutlassbob on Oct 13, 2009 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Stats
Its nice to see that the vikings are doing their job on both sides of the ball. Special Teams are 1/3rd of the plays. Can you believe we actually have good stats in that department. Its amazing. I was not in favor of bringing in a 40 year old Q.B. Boy was I mistaken. We would not be 5-0 without Brett.
Our offense is good. Our defense is good in creating turnovers. Room to improve in pass defense in the middle of the field. Run defense is good.
This team can get better. O-Line needs to keep getting better. Receivers need to keep getting better. The good news is that they can get better. That’s the great thing about youth. They can learn more if properly coached.
I want to say that this team only exists in its present form because of what the GM and Coach have drafted and traded and bought. This team is built for the long season and the players are buying in to the system. It has been easy to trash management the last few years. Lets give them their due. It should be a great season.
GO VIKES.
by lifelongvike on Oct 13, 2009 4:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If you would have told me this time last season that the Vikes would be one of the highest-scoring offenses in 2009 — after the first five weeks, at least — there’s absolutely no way I would have believed you.
I think that one has to be filed under the “If you would have told me this time last season that the Vikes would be QBed by Brett Favre and I would be happy about it, there’s absolutely no way I would have believed you.”
by puddnhead on Oct 13, 2009 5:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Another Stat
They have the best record of any team that wears purple in the NFL.
It’s true, look it up if you don’t believe me.
"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."
--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre
by MilCardFan on Oct 13, 2009 5:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We know Shiancoe is family, walking around in the locker room showing his jewels.
Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!
by VikesPma on Oct 13, 2009 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's Zygi's toy
He bought him and he can play with him however he wants.
by Sand0 on Oct 14, 2009 7:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Favre needs a little more time than he is getting
Think about it. Favre needs a little more time to totally out smart the defenses. I’m not saying he doesn’t get good pass blocking during the game. But I am saying is if we want him to score everytime the Vikings have the ball? Then the blocking has to be better more often. Favre can read defenses. But that takes time to do. Peterson could also get better blocking. I know he is shadowed by at least one linebacker every snaps of the ball. But shouldn’t our offensive line or someone be able to block that person or persons? Peterson has a heck of a time running to daylight, because there isn’t any daylight, to run too. It isn’t just 1 tackler on him it is 3 or 4, of them in our backfield 50% of the time. The Vikings need to start blocking better if they want to go deeper into the play off’s. Put a hat on a hat on every play, and stop fooling around.
by vnbushman on Oct 15, 2009 12:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















