LA has been approved for a new stadium its time for some real progress on a new stadium
lETS KEEP THE TEAM WHERE IT BELONGS
Good afternoon everyone if you haven't heard yet govenor arnold of california signed the bill to get a new stadium built in LA. There are rumors that the Vikings are beloved Norsemen are one of the seven teams named in the report of teams that could be moved. The other were St louis, Jacksonville, San dieago, Buffalo, San francisco, and Oakland.
This is a mockery i cant believe that Goddell would let this happen does he relize that he will be losing 2 of the best rivalry games in the league in the bears and the packers. To uproot this division and this is just a thought move the rams to the north and then the vikings out west is just a shame. Yes we all know about the lease ending in 2 years this is why the next two seasons are so important. Please share your thoughts maybe with some help from the fans the State legislature will relize how much the vikings mean not only to minnesota, but to the NFL
SKOL VIKINGS
This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.
0 recs |
16 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Sadly
Whoever the first market was to use public money to finance a private stadium opened up a pandoras box.
That said, what’s done is done and we can’t blame Goodell or the other owners for wanting to maximize revenue any more than we can blame a shark for eating fish. We the people of MN haven’t pressured our government to do something about it, whereas the people did for the Twins after their owner and MLB threatened to “contract” the team out of existence.
It’s all about rewarding bad behavior. The Pohlads held a gun to our heads while nickel-and-diming their team into oblivion. Meanwhile the Wilfs have tried to put the best team on the field point to the benefits of a new stadium. One approach worked the other didn’t.
Fire Childress!
by dwarg on Oct 22, 2009 2:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
$$$
“Whoever the first market was to use public money to finance a private stadium opened up a pandoras box.”
Yup, and it irks me to no end—as I’ve said before, I am not a fan of using taxpayer dollars to build venues for billionaires to showcase their product.
/winces, grits teeth
That said, if I want the Vikings to stay in Minnesota, and I do, public funding is required.
/winces again
This is all about money, and the revenue the Metrodome doesn’t generate. If the Wilfs and the NFL can get more money out of a new stadium in California, the Vikings are gone—team history, fan loyalty, and rivalry games have nothing to do with it.
by Midnight Rambler on Oct 22, 2009 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pressure
I pressured my state senator before leaving Minnesota. Since I write bizarre stories, I also understand bizarre stories when I hear them, and people who run for public office can tell some whoppers. Saying you love football is not the same thing as saying you support a stadium to play it in.
It seems the pols took some poll and decided they could skate by the stadium issue, because of stories circulating that Minnesotans don’t want to help rich people. (Apparently, those folks don’t understand that they are cutting off their own noses and helping even richer people out in California through their world view.)
So it didn’t matter that I declined to make a campaign contribution. Stadium? We don’t need no stinking stadium. After all, you have to see what the politicians see to understand their behavior. The I-35W bridge fell down, killing a few folks, and all they had to do was use some more of the taxpayers money to pay off the victims families. Nobody got terribly outraged that a bridge fell down on their watch, so what harm could come to those alleged public leaders if the Vikings left the state? They get the picture that all they must do is shrug their shoulders and say they couldn’t have forseen that, and in Minnesota people will buy it.
They say money talks, but nobody is listening. Like the ostrich, they will discover the hard way that what you decide you don’t see coming actually will knock you flat.
by Elgar on Oct 22, 2009 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again Repeat, This Is Another step in slapping our franchise in the face!
Get this dumb people!
As The Play Snaps, One Dream, One Team, One Head Coach will be on top! Will It Be The Vikings?
by UnBannedVikingholic on Oct 22, 2009 3:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Tell Minnnesota stupid Al "i can't a job franken in hollywood" to build a stadium
by vikefansd on Oct 22, 2009 4:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm just curious
If the league is "subsidizing’ the Vikes by $15,000,000 per year ( Their figure not mine) then how much do they lose in Jacksonville, Oakland, or Buffalo?
Wouldn’t the league allow only the worst revenue team to move? This makes no economic sense. Except for L.A. what other cities will pony up for a new stadium? In this enviorement I think Minnesota still has some clout left.
By the way. The Metrodome was paid off 14 years early. What happened to 14 years worth of revenue?
by lifelongvike on Oct 22, 2009 5:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Wacky Hypothetical...
Do you all think that we would be having any stadium issues right now if we had won the SB in the 98 season?
If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal
by TheViking83 on Oct 22, 2009 6:01 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah, probably...
Lease with the team through 2012 pretty much let every pol get away with ignoring the issue up to now.
I BELIEVE...
On the improbable Vikings win against the Ravens...
" OH MY HOLY BALLSACK " - IABerserker1
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 22, 2009 6:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
people should just pay the damn money get the stadium built then we’re good for another 25-50 years.. come on
"If at first you don't succeed - Skydiving isn't for you"
by Zoxide on Oct 22, 2009 8:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I really don't understand the holdup!
As The Play Snaps, One Dream, One Team, One Head Coach will be on top! Will It Be The Vikings?
by UnBannedVikingholic on Oct 22, 2009 8:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
So re-signing the Dome lease for just a couple more years isn't an option?
At least until we get this whole stadium thing figured out
From the only TRUE North division
by thewild_viking_twins on Oct 22, 2009 10:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The LA scare tactics
A team will move to LA, but it will be used as a scare tactic to get teams like the Vikes into a new stadium. Look at the list of teams (St louis, Jacksonville, San dieago, Buffalo, San francisco, and Oakland.)
Rams have Edward Jones Dome opened in 1995, the NFL is not pushing them to get a new stadium however it makes the most logistical sense for this team to return to LA, since they are part of the NFC West.
Jaguars have Jacksonville Municipal Stadium opened in 1995, again not pushing for a new stadium, but it beginning to be clear that Jacksonville is not a large enough population center to support an NFL team.
Chargers have a stadium that opened in 1967 (Although it had several names it is currently Qualcomm), I do not know enough about their situation to have an opinion.
Bills Ralph Wilson Stadium 1973, this team is clearly struggling, with off and on talk about them moving to Toronto. I see the team being the most likely to move, but not to LA. I am sure the NFL and Goodell would rather use this team to expand into the Canadian market. (Toronto)
49ers Candlestick park 1960?, This is the least likely team to move to LA. I honestly do not even understand why they are on the list.
Raiders Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum. 1960, This team just sucks and until Al Davis gives up control, they will continue to suck, I doubt LA really wants a team that is this messed up.
And then there is our dear old Vikes. The NFL knows we will never build a stadium unless we are on the verge of losing the team. So The NFL will let us believe our team is in Jeopardy. Mark my words. In 5 years the bills will be playing most of there games in Canada, and the Rams or Jags will be struggling to sell out the LA stadium in September. Side Note: The Vikings will be in a new outdoor stadium that people will complain about is too cold in December.
by Dave_M on Oct 22, 2009 11:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The 49ers are on the list because they have a badly outdated facility that doesn't have nearly the kind of revenue streams even a stadium built in the late 80s would
Honestly, unless a minor miracle happens, it will be the Chargers who end up in LA. Their stadium is so bad, the NFL decided to take San Diego off the unofficial Super Bowl rotation with New Orleans and Miami. The city of San Diego has refused to budge on a new stadium, and the Chargers only have to pay $10 million to get out of their lease if they leave after 2011, no questions asked.
The Jags, well Jacksonville was hit with a perfect storm this year between the economy collapsing (Jax has the 2nd highest unemployment rate in the NFL after Detroit), an apathetic town after the 2008 season, and a stadium that was quite frankly too big. Think about this, until the year the Jaguars outdrew the Chicago Bears every year.
by FSBlueApocalypse on Oct 23, 2009 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
util there is an NFL franchise awarded to LA all NFL owners who want a stadium will threaten to move there
Soccer is for people to small and wussy for real football
Yankees and Red Sox ...buying your way into playoffs every year
by angryandy on Oct 24, 2009 8:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















