Daily Norseman: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

No Aaron, That's Not a Zombie Chasing You; it's Jared Allen

"BBRRRAAAAAAAIIIIIINNNS!!"

More photos » by Jim Mone - AP

"BBRRRAAAAAAAIIIIIINNNS!!"

It's Halloween Weekend, which is far and away my favorite drinking holiday of the year.

It's also "Favregeddon II: The Lambeau Massacre" Weekend.

"Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day" comes out today. (Although apparently it's not a nationwide release...but still, it's the sequel to one of my favorite movies of all time!)

I may have a chance to head to Green Bay on Sunday to interview Bart Starr, Paul Krause, and Jan Stenerud thanks to the ongoing JCPenney/Van Heusen Hall of Fame promotion tour. (Still pending, but it sounds promising! If you haven't read MilCardFan's interview with Krause yet, do it. Great read.)

If you guessed that I'm more excited than a puppy with two tails right now, you'd be correct. If you thought that I wasn't going to tie in a cheesy Halloween gimmick throughout this article, then I'd like to be the first to welcome you to our site.

First of all, there is one irrefutable reason why Halloween kicks so much ass. No, it isn't candy--it's because this is the one day of the year that gives every girl full license to dress as slutty as they want without any social repercussions. Think about it--98% of women's costumes are "Sexy <fill in the blank>." Sexy Cat, Sexy Police Officer, Sexy Devil, Sexy Cowgirl, Sexy French Maid (is there a Non-Sexy French Maid?)--they're all variations of the same basic premise. (For instance, my girlfriend is going to be Sexy Rapunzel at our Halloween party tonight, and I couldn't be happier. Over/under on off-color hair-pulling jokes from me tonight: 11.5.) Throw in the fact that everyone's inhibitions are inexplicably lowered by about 80% when wearing a disguise of any sort and you got yourself one hell of an entertaining holiday.

(Note to everyone with younger kids: sorry for reminding you how much fun Halloween used to be a few years back. I'm sure you'll have fun trying to put your kids to bed tomorrow night after they have ingested enough sugar to put a wildebeest into a coma.)

As for Sunday's game, I won't bore you with minutiae about each team. It's the Vikings and Packers. We're sorta familiar with each other already. Instead, I'll dole out the classic Halloween costumes that best suit various personnel on each team. (See, I told you there would be a cheesy Halloween gimmick!)

Zombies: They're always coming after you. It seems like you're surrounded by them at every turn. They won't stop until they're on top of you, ripping you limb from limb and eating your brains. Sounds like Jared Allen and rest of the Vikings defensive line to me!

Decapitated Zombies: Zombies are scary. Dead zombies are just gross. They don't move around at all; they're decrepid, smell awful, and don't pose a threat of any kind. That pretty much sums up the Packers offensive line, no?

Mummy: This costume goes to Aaron Rodgers. Even though everyone assumes a mummy should be dead and is bandaged up from head to toe, he's still scary and hard to kill. Rodgers has taken an absolute beating all year thanks to the Decapitated Zombies, yet he's still the second rated passer in the league. Even as a Vikings fan, I have to appreciate that. He gives the Packers a chance to win all by himself at times.

Werewolf: This one has to go to Brett Favre. Just like a werewolf, he can be a lethal, unstoppable force. But the drawback is that you're never sure when he's going to change in certain conditions. Even worse, werewolves can't control when they'll change. I know Favre has been more or less outstanding in 2009, but I wonder if returning to Lambeau will be his Full Moon. I don't think there's a stat line from him that would surprise me. 24/28, 338 yds, 4 TD, 0 INT? Sure. 16/43, 113 yds, 0 TD, 4 INT? I could see it. I'm just hoping we get the cool Michael J. Fox "Teenwolf" werewolf, not the creepy Jack NIcholson "Wolf" werewolf.

(More costumes and my Week 8 NFL picks after the jump.)

Star-divide

77542239_medium

  I told you Halloween is awesome.

 

Vampire: While vampires are immortal and can strike out of the dark at any time, they can just as easily be killed by showing them a little daylight. This costume goes to the entire 2009 Vikings team. At times, it has looked like nothing can kill us. Thanks to the likes of Percy Harvin, Sidney Rice, and AP, we can go for the other team's throat without warning. Unfortunately, our tendency to give up the big play this year has left us very vulnerable--every time we show the other team some daylight, a sure win turns to dust. The Ray Rice plays, the Pittsburgh defensive TD's, the San Fran blocked field goal, the Jermichael Finley Show in Week 4...all of the big plays have made victories uncomfortably close, and it cost us a win last week. If we want to leave Lambeau with a stranglehold on the NFC North, we can't let big plays be our stake through the heart.

Purple Jesus: What's that you say? Adrian Peterson isn't a traditional costume at all? You think I have to assign something like "Ghost" or "Goblin" to the best player in the NFL? Go ahead, I dare you to try and categorize AP with a Halloween gimmick. See what happens. Isn't that right, William Gay?

The Vikings proved they were the better team a month ago. Nothing has happened in the past month to change that fact. Unless Werewolf Favre shows up at the wrong time, I don't see this game going any different than the one at the Dome.

Prediction: Vikings 31, Packers 20

As for the rest of my Week 8 NFL Picks (home team in CAPS):

RAVENS over Broncos: The only logic I have with this pick is that the Broncos can't possibly be 7-0 good and the Ravens can't possibly be 3-4 bad...can they?

BEARS over Browns: My Eliminator pick of the week. (I'm 7-0 and still alive for those keeping track at home.) At this point I think Cleveland fans should start visiting people with terminal illnesses to get a new perspective on life. I'm not saying the Browns fans would be cheered up though. I think someone dying might realize it could be much worse. Their suffering will probably end soon, while there's no end in sight for the Browns.

COWBOYS over Seahawks: Who knows which Seahawks team will show up, but one thing is for sure: Miles Austin is scary. And he's a pretty good wide receiver.

Smilinmiles_medium

GAHHHHH!! (Image from Kissing Suzy Kolber)

LIONS over Rams: Oh my God, the Detroit Lions are favored in a game! If you even think about watching this game, go take a shower to get the filth off of you.

Texans over BILLS: Houston is the only road favorite this week. Isn't that SPOOKY?? (And you thought the Halloween theme was over!! MUUUUAHAHAHAHAHA)

COLTS over 49ers: Alex Smith rises from the dead to take over as the starter for the Niners. (Boom! More Halloween analogies! I'm unstoppable!) He'll have plenty of chances to prove that his arm is superior to Shaun Hill's, because they're going to be down by a lot the whole game.

JETS over Dolphins: For both teams, the less their quarterback is involved in the offense, the better their team performs. After last week's games, it looks like the Jets have figured out how to minimize Mark Sanchez more than the Dolphins can hide Chad Henne.

CHARGERS over Raiders: You know how most teams try to "keep the ball out of so and so's hands?" I think Norv Turner's strategy this week should be "keep the ball IN JaMarcus Russell's hands." Nothing but good things can happen for the Chargers.

Jaguars over TITANS: I'm going to make Vince Young prove he doesn't suck before I pick his winless team, even if it is against a mediocre Jags squad.

CARDINALS over Panthers: I still don't completely trust the Cards, but they look poised to repeat in the NFC West after their big win in New York. Meanwhile, John Fox is like the corner guy for a boxer that's too proud to throw in the towel. His guy is just getting murdered out there, yet he still won't pull the plug. Or maybe he just knows that Jake Delhomme's backups are equally as awful.

Giants over EAGLES: The G-Men haven't looked great the past two weeks, but Brian Westbrook is still...get this...QUESTIONABLE for the game thanks to a concussion last week! I wonder who is second place all-time being listed as Questionable for a game, behind Westrbook's career mark of 3,431? Shouldn't his nickname be "Q" by now? He has caused more agony for fantasy owners than all other players combined. My roommate last year nearly went bipolar after worrying about Westbrook's playing status so much.

SAINTS over Falcons: The New Orleans offense is making my Madden team jealous. Drew Brees turned the ball over four times last week and they still lit up the Dolphins for 46 points. I'm not picking against the Saints until someone outscores them.

Last week: 9-4

Season so far: 75-28

0 recs  |  Comment 38 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Oh hell

Im gonna be honest here………I’d take any one of the 3 if not all 3

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Oct 30, 2009 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

good post

as usual!
Let’s just hope the MJ werewolf shows up on Sunday!

by dthompson on Oct 30, 2009 3:41 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

vyequeens

well brett showed u how ugly he can be ! expect more of the same . he is good for a few more picks come sunday

by bfhaterfrom the get go on Oct 30, 2009 3:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

see...

you did it all wrong… nice try though… for a Packer fan.

I BELIEVE...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 30, 2009 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

ummm

yah his comment was a little silly…but you’re comeback? wow, blew me away.

"stay (green and) gold"

by Green and Bold on Oct 30, 2009 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

*your

"stay (green and) gold"

by Green and Bold on Oct 30, 2009 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

not snarky enough for you?

or were you expecting explatives?

I BELIEVE...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 30, 2009 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why don't

you so called Packer fans just admit you are really Vikings Fans? You are reading this site probably more than a Packer site. Life will be much better for you if you could just admit it.

by Vikingeric2001 on Oct 30, 2009 4:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you talking about last week?

Because he played pretty well. The blindside strip-sack happens to everyone now and then, and we should have already been in the endzone if it wasn’t for that terrible penalty call on Dugan. The pick was on Chester, hands down. If he plays like that against the Packers, we should be just fine.

by ericj69 on Oct 30, 2009 4:27 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention

For being supposedly ugly, he’s doing as good as Rodgers who doesnt have that much of a higher passer rating.

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Oct 31, 2009 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I heard Wayne Larivee

describe it as Favre’s fault because he was jumpy about the rush and threw the ball before the play developed. I agree with you though.

by Salty on Oct 31, 2009 10:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sexy fill in the blank

Gal on the right looks like a sexy Pippy Longstocking, truly an oxymoron if ever there was one.

"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."

--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre

by MilCardFan on Oct 30, 2009 4:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

the blonde in the middle has better hand placement.

I BELIEVE...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 30, 2009 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Come on....

No love for the Sexy FBI agent? Guess I’ll just have to take her off your hands.

by HiWayRobry on Oct 30, 2009 7:59 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Kudos

I a not much of a poster and as a Packer fan, I am loathe to enjoy anything from a rival, but I gotta give you guys credit. Every time I have visted this site, the posts have always been a blast to read as well as being relatively objective. A pleasure really.

For the record, not all Packer fans are rabidly certifiable and looking to start a flame war.

by SilverFng on Oct 30, 2009 9:39 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

lol

I know, there are only a few of them as there are only a few Vikes fans along that line as well. In most cases, I take and give the ribbing in fun. Of course, Ive been giving my best friend crap all week, since he is originally from WI lol

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Oct 31, 2009 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree Favre still sucks but...

if I was a Lambeau field today (like my lucking f*ing son Ericj69) I would HAVE to cheer for Brett Favre just to tick off the cheese heads!

by wesjt on Nov 1, 2009 9:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Unsexy French Maid

yes, it exists I’m linking to it because there’s really no good reason to make people look at this. Sorry, for being a killjoy.

by archie2227 on Oct 31, 2009 1:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

hehe

as soon as I read that there was no such thing, I just knew google images would provide an awful image to prove otherwise.

by archie2227 on Nov 1, 2009 8:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

jerk

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?" -Joe Kapp

by less cowbell, more 'neau on Oct 31, 2009 9:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, I stand corrected.

I think I’ll just stick to my usual image of a French Maid, thank you very much.

by ericj69 on Nov 1, 2009 4:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

great post and I love Halloween too

but:

The Vikings proved they were the better team a month ago. Nothing has happened in the past month to change that fact. Unless Werewolf Favre shows up at the wrong time, I don’t see this game going any different than the one at the Dome.

is wrong

The Packers secondary is much stronger with Bigby back, and Peterson has one maybe good game in his career against the Packers.

And the game is at Lambeau.

You think the Vikings want revenge after losing to a completly unrelated team?
How about the Packers wanting revenge for FARVE???? That kinda raises the stakes there…

This game could go any way, so please stop predicting blowouts for the Vikings and pretending they’re valid predictions. (31-20 is not a blowout but I’ve seen some other posts on here saying 37-10 and such which of course is ridiculous).

Oh, and stop saying Rodgers will throw an interception when you won’t even have your one good player on the secondary playing. Rodgers has two interceptions in six games. Yeah thats right, two, in six games. Fumbles are more likely with the decapiated zombies protecting him.

Kind of a shame the Rockies aren't around to win it for Balloon Boy
-billyok

by blackoutsox on Oct 31, 2009 4:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Valid predictions only!

You tell them. And hey, the zombies probably wish he’d get around to throwing the ball.

by Salty on Oct 31, 2009 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Brett...

only has three interceptions in seven games (with zero interceptions in the last game versus the Packers), but every Packer fan keeps stating that he is going to throw several interceptions. So I don’t see why it isn’t possible that Aaron could throw one interception with the kind of pressure that he is likely to face once again.

by Norse Force on Nov 1, 2009 9:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, Another Crank...

Angry because Viking fans support the Vikings and want them to win. Um, blackoutsox, I can’t but wonder at your comments.

I’m sorry, but I’m having a hard time believing that just because Bigby is back, that’s going to suddenly make a monumental difference. I think the improvement is needed in the front four of the Packer’s D, if they can’t get a pass rush going, Bigby is going to mean little. And guess what? Favre has torched better players than Bigby in secondaries he opposed.

The Packers shut down Adrian last game, how much good did that do?

The Vikings don’t need revenge as a motivator, what are you talking about? Didn’t the Packers want “revenge” at the first meeting of these teams? I seriously doubt the attitude was back in the Metrodome for the Packers, “Oh hell, if we lose, we’ll just play better against them at Lambeau”. The Vikings want to WIN, what is so hard to understand about that? The stakes are far higher than some childish revenge fantasy against Favre. The Packers need this win if they expect to seriously contend for the division. A loss won’t eliminate them, but they’ll be in essence three games back with eight to play and the Packers schedule only gets tougher. It will make winning the division far more difficult. That certainly raises the stakes.

And people on this blog (including you) can post any damn score they want, so for you to have the audacity to “command” people to stop favoring the Vikings is laughable. And, yes, the game can go either way, genius. Please forgive us for not being in awe of your analytic savvy.

And we WILL say Rodgers can throw an interception. Do you honestly think he’s that good or do you think the Vikings secondary is that bad. Oh, and one of those two interceptions was in Minnesota. He threw, what, 13 last year, so he can be picked off. Pardon the blasphemy.

This game will be played, the Packers will go on, the Vikings will go on, and a lot of people are going to feel foolish over the way they acted over all this after it’s all said and done.

by Purple And Gold Forever on Oct 31, 2009 5:09 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good post, eric,

except for the prediction, of course.

The glass is more than half-full.

by NorthStarr on Oct 31, 2009 7:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Also,

Be respectful to Mr. Starr.
He was the greatest quarterback we ever had.

(The guys over at Cold, Hard Football Facts.com like him, too.)

The glass is more than half-full.

by NorthStarr on Oct 31, 2009 7:29 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good, no reason to retire #4’s jersey. The latest propaganda campaign is that he doesn’t make his receivers better either.

Didn’t Starr call Favre a much better QB? I think he might have even called out the Packers for the crappy teams they had around 2006.

by Salty on Oct 31, 2009 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have opined in the past (somewhere, if not here)

that Favre should go into the Hall of Fame (and thus, into the Packers’ ring of honor [loose application of the word, ‘honor’, there]), but that having his number retired by the Packers is a higher tribute, of which he, with only one Super Bowl win (for the Packers), among other reasons, is not worthy.

Didn’t Starr call Favre a much better QB?

Starr has always been a very humble man, as the Kerry Byrne at CCHF discovered when he interviewed him.

For the record, in their post-season careers:
Starr completed 61.0% of his passes; Favre completed 60.7%.
Starr connected on 7.0% of his passes for touchdowns; Favre only 5.4%.
Starr threw imterceptions on only 1.4% of his passes; Favre nearly tripled that, getting picked on 5.4% of his throwa.
Starr’s average gain was 8.23 yards per attempt; Favre averaged just 7.37.

Those are the four factors used to determine the passer rating;
consequently, Starr’s career post-season passer rating is an all-time NFL best(!) 104.8, while Favre’s is a more pedestrian 85.2.

Starr’s career post-season W-L record is 9-1.
Favre’s record was 9-3 going into the Super Bowl XXXII loss to Denver in 1998 and has been an ugly 3-7 in the 10 games beginning with that Super Bowl, making his career record a rather mediocre 12-10.

Starr earned a ring for leading the Packers to the pinnacle of pro football supremacy (whatever that may have been in any given season) five times (the only quarterback in NFL history to win five rings).
He did that in a span of seven years!
Favre, in sixteen seasons in Green Bay, could muster only one Super Nowl championship, plus one other conference title.
I stand by my statement that “He was the greatest quarterback we ever had.”

The glass is more than half-full.

by NorthStarr on Nov 1, 2009 5:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

AND

As I have pointed out before, but will do again for your benefit:
Starr played in an NFL that ranged in size from 14 to 16 teams and Favre, while with the Packers, played in an NFC that ranged in size from the exact same 14 to 16 teams.
Therefor, it is completely fair to compare Starr’s five NFL championships to Favre’s two NFC titles.

The glass is more than half-full.

by NorthStarr on Nov 1, 2009 5:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You forget to mention,

that Starr played on teams that had 5 hall of famers on defense and five more on offense (which should have been six – Kramer is not in there primarily for political reasons). I don’t think any other NFL QB ever lined up with two hall of fame running backs in the backfield.

And the greatest coach in the history of the NFL. Starr never had a winning season before Lombardi arrived and never had one after Lombardi left. He’s a great quarterback, I agree, but one that benefited from playing on the best team, for most of a decade, that was ever assembled. An aged career backup QB, Zeke Bratkowski (whose only previous winning season was in 1954), managed to have a winning record on those teams, the few times he had to fill in for an injured Starr.

by Migrant lurker on Nov 1, 2009 6:40 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So, then,

You’re saying that Starr won his championships with the help of actual teammates,
while Favre won his, and got the Packers franchise as far as it got in the seasons it didn’t win it all, by himself, and by gosh and by golly, if he would have just had some teammates to help carry the load, then the Packers could have won a lot more.
Is that it?
Did Favre set all of those volume records of his without linemen to block for and protect him; without receivers to catch the ball for him; without quality backs to keep defenses honest so they couldn’t just pin their ears back and go after him all the time?

I have provided more than enough evidense to collaborate my acclaimation of Starr as the best QB we have ever had, and I stand by it.

I suspect, however, that you will continue to think what you want to think, and won’t be swayed by any amount of evidense.

The glass is more than half-full.

by NorthStarr on Nov 1, 2009 6:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Da game

yah dere hey, youse Viking fans bedder haf fun now, cus after tomorrow youse vill all be cryin yer eyes out.

by yahderehey on Oct 31, 2009 7:36 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Why?

Why would we be? Even if we lose, all it means is that we split our series with each team winning at home. Whoopity-doo! Yeah, a loss brings the Packers closer in the Divisional race but with their far tougher schedule in the second-half, even if they end up closer to us in the Divisional race it’ll still be super tough for them to win the Division, imho.

So this game really shouldn’t be as hyped up as it is, all things considered. If our awesome Vikings win, it just proves what we all already thought about them – that they’re definitely a really good football team. Even if we won, it won’t guarantee a Divisional title – that’s why we play all the games on the schedule. :)

SKOL VIKINGS!!

by Wytefang on Nov 1, 2009 10:38 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Funny post

Packers line as headless zombies sounds about right

by WarWolf on Nov 1, 2009 12:01 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!
Start posting about the Vikings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dodge_front_small
Comparing '98 to '09, Defense
Vikings_logo_small
FOX wants to nickname the Vikings defensive line
Dodge_front_small
Good-Bye, Bad-Bye

Recent FanPosts

Viking_flag_small
The Beginning of the End
Vikings_small
Place Your Bets...Cutler
Vikings_small
Place Your Bets...Rodgers
Throwdpeterson_small
Quick Fun: Vote: Best Favre Photo!
Percy-harvin_small
Greatest Picks Part 2 (56-09)
Small
We have built it, they will come
Throwdpeterson_small
Update: More Videos! ENJOY!
Small
Iraqi Militants Are Favre Fans???
Favre_viking_small
Hasselbeck loved being the understudy.
Small
I would

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Head Coach

Dailynorseman_small Gonzo

Coordinators

Me_at_the_vikings_game_small ericj69

Childress_small Anthony21