Daily Norseman: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Time to give some props to Chilly??


OK everybody,

 

         I'm willing to admit to you that up until this year, Brad Childress Football was about as much fun to watch as paint dry.  But let's look at what he's accomplished since he took over for Mike Tice and where he and the rest of the personnel guys have us sitting for the future...  I also will talk about how loose he and the players seem this year...

Anyway, here are the starters and role players that have been drafted in the Childress era:

Adrian Peterson, Sidney Rice, Chad Greenway, Cedric Griffin, Brian Robison, Cheech Harvin, Phil Loadholt, Tyrell Johnson, Tarvaris Jackson

And the vets he's brought in:

Steve Hutchinson, Jared Allen, Brett Favre, Bernard Berrian, Madieu Williams, Jimmy Kennedy, Chester Taylor, Sage Rosenfels

I know I'm forgetting people, but seriously, has any other team done more while sacrificing less as far as draft picks to build a team that can win now, but has the ability to keep filling holes as they come??

Now that Childress has the pieces he needs, we actually have that KAO going, and Chilly has warmed up a bit, to the point of dressing like a flight attendant on the way to Pittsburgh last week.  I am a convert.  I didn't like Childress at all up until this year, and now I think we may have the guy that the Wilfs told us we had several years ago.  I want to commend the owners and the whole team for giving Childress the latitude and time to rebuild a strong team.  I'd like to hear from the supporters, the detractors and the converts here; tell me what you think of Childress this year...

This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.

0 recs  |  Comment 102 comments  |  Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Assuming at the Stew Dress wasn't the fulfillment of a lifelong fantasy....

I think he’s done wonders in transforming a team of cancers who thought themselves privileged, underpaid, and above team rules, NFL regs, and the law… into a team of guys who more like a family than just professionals, a team of genuinely decent guys who go out of their way to do the right thing and to be role models for the community. He doesn’t tolerate cancers, even if they’re hot prospects. That’s integrity.

He’s built a great corps of players and as much credit as goes to the front office and Wilf, the HC has major input on who they decide to bring in. At the end of the day, the HC takes the rap, or the credit, and Chilly’s done very well.

We’ve improved each year so far (other than the first, which doesn’t count because that’s the starting benchmark) and this year we have a genuine shot at going all the way. Can’t ask for better than that.

His play calling is stil suspect at times, but he seems to be getting better at it. It’s scary, going for that 4th and 1 gamble, but he’s going for it more often than not, and I like that a lot too.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 2, 2009 11:13 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Agree

Loved that he went for it on 4th and 1 but next time if you’re going to impose your will run the ball to the left, right off of Hutchinson’s ass.
Yes everyone knows that our left side is our strongside for the run, but if I’m betting my run offense for 1 yard that’s where I’m going.

by midnightwonder on Nov 2, 2009 12:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

He has put together a very talented 53 man roster. The in game management and play calling were horrible the last couple years, but has been much improved this season. Clearly he was protecting T-Jack from himself, but it was still bad.

by Spartan99 on Nov 2, 2009 12:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comes with the job

When Childress first arrived, a portion of his responsibilities was to change the team culture, including the reduction of the number of people who were appearing in the newpaper’s crime articles rather than in sports stories. Certain Minnesotans were moaning the Vikings were a bunch of sex-crazed, doper thugs, which is not the kind of image that sells well for a sports franchise. The coaching job was not to be well-liked, it was to restore law and order. Being the new sheriff in town is never about having everyone in the metroplex like you. All change is painful, even change for the better. Watching TV and movies can give the false impression that every problem can be fixed in and hour or two by some superhero. Most real life stories take much more time to play out.

by Elgar on Nov 2, 2009 12:11 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

30 pts a game

We have been scoring about 30 pts per game on average and 38 points at Lamebowl! I am becoming a believer. The D needs work but a healthy Windfield would help that.

What I do not understand is every game, of late,the other team is completely shut down and then starts to pick us a part. Is this because the pass rush slows later, or the plays called on D change, or what.
My fear is that a team like the Saints will figure out this in the first quarter not the fourth.

it is better to be thought of as dumb then to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Ben Franklin

by montana vikes fan on Nov 2, 2009 12:12 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

If you listen to videos of Childress on the sidelines, he is directing the team to “step on their necks” That seems not to be happening because it is human nature to think that if you came in and went up by two TD’s or so, you must be a lot better that those other guys.

In reality, being a lot better than those other guys does not guarantee any victories, because those other guys are being paid to win and if you give them an inch, they’ll take a mile. Momentum shifts just require a little opening, and then those other guys start thinking they really have a chance not to go home in disgrace today.

The keys are conditioning and understanding and executing your assignment properly. That stuff takes place during the week, not just on game day. Hopefully seeing this happen over and over in games will convince players that the coach is not just yacking. You have to arrive prepared to play well for all 60 minutes and even into overtime if necessary.

by Elgar on Nov 2, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well said Elgar!

I totally agree.
Kudos to the entire front office, coaches and scouts!
Also in another post somewhere it was said that Favre in a sense let the rest of the team
know it was okay to believe in themselves.
Thanx Chilly!

A bird in the hand is worth about 10.99 at KFC and makes me lick my chops
Yummy!!!!!

by kdog69 on Nov 2, 2009 12:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t care for Chilly’s play calling the last two years but this year other then the first two games have been much more to my liking. In particular sending AP in to get 1 yard on 4th and 1 is exactly what I want to see. I relly don’t understand the defensive meltdowns in the second half. I wonder if our DLine is gassed and we shouldn’t be rotating them more.

by zebano on Nov 2, 2009 3:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

With a Vikes cap an the beard

Chilly almost looks like someone you could trust with a pro football team. Regardless of that, (irregardless??) He’s got 7 wins under his belt, and even the most optimistic fan here could never have guessed we’d have 1 loss at this stage o’ the season. (an yeah, at least 2 of those wins was cause o’ Farve…but who got him here?)

Seeings how this is a “time to give props” post, howabout we give a little up for the kicking game? Longwell has been amazing, and when was the last time you saw Kluwe take the field and think “Oh gawd, we’re so screwed!” ‘Member last year when he got us out of all sorts of Jackson-related offensive troubles? He’s still doing it, only not from our own end-zone. Oh, and the coverage is a lot better too.

by U don't have a Kluwe on Nov 2, 2009 12:51 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Good point — punting and placekicking has been superb this year, along with special teams in general. Kudos to Chilly for having Brian Murphy take over ST coordinator.

by cutlassbob on Nov 2, 2009 3:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Last year Kluwe was a nightmare

He was one of the biggest problems with out special teams, he wasn’t executing. He wasn’t doing what Childress told him to do, he wasn’t providing the hang-time necessary for the rest of the team to get downfield, he wasn’t very accurate. He almost got his ass fired over it, Childress brought in a group of punters to compete for Kluwe’s job during the season!

This year he’s done a 180 and is looking like a fine punter. What happened? I don’t know what caused the change, but I’m glad the problem’s been fixed.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 4, 2009 10:31 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I can tell you what has changed.

Brian Murphy took over as special teams coach after Paul Ferraro left. Ferraro tried to turn Kluwe into a directional kicker instead of letting him do what he does best, kick it long and high. Murphy has instructed Kluwe to do just that. It has really paid off. A good indication of the success in the different coaching philosophies can be seen in the number of fair catches.

2005 – Kluwe’s first year – 14 fair catches
2006 – 21 fair catches
2007 – Ferraro is hired – 6 fair catches
2008 – 8 fair catches
2009 – Ferraro out and Murphy in – 8 through 8 games

"Skol pa fiskande"

by NobleSavage on Nov 6, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I am willing to give Chilly props, so long as he does one thing in the next offseason.

That is, address our Quarterback position aggressively.

Let’s face it, Favre won’t be here longer than two years tops. So we need a VIABLE replacement for him. The way this team is built, we don’t need a Peyton Manning. But it would be nice to find someone who is a solid leader, strong under pressure and smart.

I am a fan of Tjack, but who knows if he will learn enough from Favre to be able to play at the level we need him to.

The bottom line is, we need someone more suitable for the role than Jackson or Rosencopter, and we are likley not going to find it through the draft. Childress is the guy who is supposed to know how to develop a QB and the only one he has been successful with is the one who he hasn’t had to get his greasy little fingers involved in.

Until that position is addressed in a manner that does not squander the 3-4 year window we have, I will continue my original assessment of Childress as an Idiot.

by Bjorno on Nov 2, 2009 1:12 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

How?

Bjorno,

     Tell me how you would address the QB situation in the offseason, especially if you don’t do it through the draft? The Cutler trade was pretty much the biggest non draft day QB trade in the last 30 years, and see how it worked out for Chicago?? I love how Orton has made Cutler and Chicago look like idiots all season long acting as a system QB. Anyway, I think the only way to get a blue chip QB is to mortgage the draft for one, most likely getting a rookie 1st rounder. Who could we pry away for a 1st and 2nd rounder?? We could buy a draft pick, but I doubt we could buy a young starting QB, it just doesn’t happen unless the QB makes it happen. I say we have to draft a QB, and I’d draft using the Parcells method. College Grad, 3 year starter, 30 wins. I don’t care if it’s a flashy school or not, look at Flacco. Find a tall, strong, smart, seasoned rookie and give him a year under Favre and a year under Rosenfels and turn his ass loose in year 3 unless he wins a spot earlier.

by ctowner35 on Nov 2, 2009 1:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The problem with us doing it through the draft is two things.

1. We are likely going to have the 32nd pick. :)

2. First round QB’s are hit or miss.

The key here is that we don’t need a Peyton Manning, or a Drew Brees to win with the talent we have on the field. We need a smart Quarterback first and foremost.

We could take a gamble in the draft, but then we are still going to need him to sit for a year or so to get used to the game at this level. Players like Matt Ryan don’t come along very often.

The Vikes simply do not have the luxury of drafting a QB and letting him ride the bench a few years until he gets it. We need a guy who gets it now, who simply hasn’t been put in the right position with a solid supporting cast.

by Bjorno on Nov 2, 2009 2:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Rosenfels looked really good in the pre-season with the 1st offense. He’s sitting 3rd string because we are trying to give jackson a chance do something to find someone willing to compensate us for him. No one will compensate for a 3rd stringer. A 2nd stringer who was a starter that won more than lost maybe.

We are the vikings.......resistance is futile.

by Hoss-Drone on Nov 2, 2009 3:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Vikings won't trade Jackson

The Vikings won’t trade Jackson. He will be re-signed during or after this year (let’s hope) and then the Vikings will keep him on the roster. He will probably beat the competition out and take over the #1 spot for 2010.

by medicineball on Nov 2, 2009 4:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yea,

There are plenty of teams that are clamoring for his jump-passes and sub-60% completion percentage.

by Bjorno on Nov 3, 2009 11:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

His contract expires at the end of this season

The Vikings can’t trade him because Jackson is a free agent after this season.

He’s no joke. He’s a good player and still developing and getting better as a quarterback.

by medicineball on Nov 3, 2009 11:28 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Disagree with that

He hasn’t developed what he need in the time he has. This can be attributed to the QB coach or on TJ. One or the other. One of them needs to go, maybe both of them.

by Grime on Nov 3, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He simply should not have started a game until this season at the earliest.

The fact that we threw him in his rookie year was what hindered his ability to become what he has the potential to become.

I am happy to see what he can do after a year of Favrecation, but it is not time to close the book.

by Bjorno on Nov 3, 2009 12:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

may be that is why he is not good

by vikefansd on Nov 3, 2009 1:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not so sure...

How does giving a new QB a chance to actually play, to lead the team, to actually do what is expected of him, hinder his development and ruin him, or make him a worse QB?

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 4, 2009 10:35 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

preseason? preseason doesn't matter.

Don’t forget about the preseason super bowl champions the GB packers.

by dsludo on Nov 2, 2009 6:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think

If Favre does not come back. Rosencopter will be our QB. If Favre come back for one more round. I think he wiil learn from Favre enough to be our QB for 3-4 years. then we can draft Ryan Mallet.

by vikefansd on Nov 3, 2009 1:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Pre-season means nothing

The Packers were almost crowned Super Bowl Champions after their pre-season. Where are they now. ;)

by boomy44 on Nov 3, 2009 10:31 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Bjorno…do you have any current QBs in mind? Just curious. I believe Spielman said something about not wanting to lose any of our next draft picks after trading them for Rosenfels, JA, so your draft theory is probably correct. Wasn’t Rosenfels signed to a multiyear deal? While Rosenfels didn’t overwhelm anyone in the preseason, he certainly wasn’t completely outplayed by Jackson. Maybe the year (or two) under Favre will benefit one or both of them.

by cutlassbob on Nov 2, 2009 3:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well I was interested in Alex Smith or Chad Henne, even David Carr. Unfortunately, I think neither Smith nor Henne will be available after their recent showings.

Carr and Smith were kinda shoved in before they were ready, and both are capable of being excellent QB’s. Henne was just a guy that I have always thought had “it”. If anyone can figure out what “It” is, maybe we can bottle it and give it to Tjack.

by Bjorno on Nov 2, 2009 7:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I give him props

I give Chilly credit, for realizing he was wrong about tjoke. I take a big man to admit that you were wrong. It is really important to Chilly that let his ego take a back sit. tjoke is hand pick and groom by him. There is an old saying " you take a step back and you can see for miles".

by vikefansd on Nov 2, 2009 2:02 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

1/2 agreement

Has he actually said that he was wrong? Maybe he’s just saying that TJ is no Hall of Famer, and everyone knew that already.

Childress may have similar delusions about Tyrell Johnson, Cedric Griffin, and Ray Edwards.

by KC Viking on Nov 2, 2009 3:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

His actions are the only "statements" that matter

And his actions have led to having favre & rosenfels as alternatives to Tjack this year, vs. just Gus last year.

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

RIght.

But at first it was only Sage, a career backup with a high INT%. Had he not managed to beg the first-ballot HoFer out of retirement, we may be seeing TJ at QB again by now.

by KC Viking on Nov 2, 2009 4:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no for tj

tjoke is not ready this year. If he learn from Favre, like Cassel learn from brady This is an opportunity of a life time for him. I think rosencopter is learning right now. I hope the same for tjoke. If both of them sit and learn. We are set at QB. We can find a nother project in the draft: Ryan Mallet, Tony Pike to name a few. I like i said these two guy have to really learn how to read defense.

by vikefansd on Nov 2, 2009 4:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

This year, no.

But I am looking forward to see what he can do next year.

by Bjorno on Nov 2, 2009 7:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I take exception

I take exception to your dumb nickname for Tarvaris Jackson.

How do you like this: 20 TD, 18 INT for his very young career. He is still only 26 years old and he has already achieved that positive ratio. Last year, he had a 95.4 passer rating. This year, his rating is 118.8. His career record as a starter is 10-10. He has his first playoff game as a starter under his belt.

It would be inexpensive to re-sign Jackson. Doing so would allow the Vikings to see what he has later on.

by medicineball on Nov 2, 2009 4:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He's not all that

His rating was higher last year and this year because he’s padded his stats in garbage time as a backup. Look at the games he started. If it was against a good team, he was horrible. If he faced one of the 10 worst secondaries, he seemed to do well, although he still didn’t manage his career high against the worst team ever. It’s ok that he threw 2 more TDs than INTs, but that is not spectacular. It’s a backup’s ratio, not a starter’s. He is simply not Donovan McNabb AT ALL.

by KC Viking on Nov 2, 2009 4:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

His rating was higher last year and this year because he’s padded his stats in garbage time as a backup.

No garbage time last year. He started two games, was yanked early and then came in in the Detroit game.

I would say that 8 for 10 with 105 yards and 1TD in a half is a pretty good game against the “worst team ever”.

But, you are right, he is not Donovan McNabb.

by Bjorno on Nov 3, 2009 12:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're right, too

I guess he didn’t throw passes in 2-3 games and only 1/1 for 8 yards in garbage time vs. the Titans. I still don’t think of the Lions game as terribly meaningful, though.

TJ’s 2008 numbers are still padded in the sense that he missed playing against some good secondaries but got to play vs. the worst ones (and the Giants’ backups).

by KC Viking on Nov 3, 2009 1:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

you may not like it but it is true

Hes is a joke compare to a really NFL QB.
1. He can not read defense.
2. He can only operate on half of the field.
3. If they take out the roll out he can’t even function properly

You compare that to Joe the rookies Flacco, Matt the rookies Ryan, Mark the rookies sanchaez. do i need to list more. He is a joke. He will be a joke until he prove he can read defense. In the words of Steve Young he is making mistake of a high school QB. Jaws said the samething. I am not saying it. This does not mean he can’t be a good QB. He has lots of learning. It start now to hit the film room. He need to start learning the play book.

by vikefansd on Nov 3, 2009 12:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Quarterbacks develop differently

Some take longer than others. What we have seen from Jackson is continuous improvement. He hasn’t reached his ceiling yet.

Rich Gannon did not become good even after 5 years. The Vikings let him go and then he went on to greatness for other teams.

Keep T-Jack!

by medicineball on Nov 3, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Tjack has to show something the next chance he gets, or I am ready to let him go to another team.

by Bjorno on Nov 3, 2009 12:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're wrong about Gannon

Rich Gannon had shown a lot more after 5 years. He posted a rating of 81.5 in his 5th yr/2nd yr as a starter, and that was in an era that allowed d-backs to chuck and blitzers to pummel without a bunch of safety rules, lowering the average passer rating by quite a bit (to about 78-79 compared to a league average of 83.5 while TJ posted a 70.8 rating in 2007). In fact, even in Gannon’s 1st year as a starter when he posted that awful 68.9 rating, that was only 8.5 points below the average, not 12.7.

You think 20:18 TD:INT is a good ratio for a starter? Check out Gannon’s after 23 starts: 28:23 (counting INTs thrown in non-starts as a rookie, etc.). He also managed a full season of starting with an INT% less than 2.0 which TJ has not.

The worst thing about most TJ fans is that they don’t seem to think that he should have to EARN his roster spot and role with the team. His career stats rank him very low among active NFL QBs.

by KC Viking on Nov 3, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Tarvaris posted a 95.4 passer rating last year.

Last year Tarvaris had a passer rating of 95.4. In his entire career, Jackson has only 13 fumbles, 7 lost, in approximately 730 touches. That’s great for a quarterback.

TD/INT 20:18 and 28:23 are roughly comparable ratios. Gannon was NFL MVP when he was 37. Jackson is currently just 26 years old. Favre has stated that only after playing for 9 years in the NFL did he begin to read defenses. It’s no surprise that it isn’t T-Jack’s strong suit. Jackson first cracked 90 in passer rating when he was 25 years old. Gannon first cracked it when he was 29. Jackson has probably a decade of solid play in front of him.

Here’s what the Vikings should do.

1. Re-sign Jackson to a multi-year deal. The base salary will not be huge.

2. Draft a quarterback or two in 2010. Ideally, in the first or second round. This is for insurance purposes.

3. Look at quarterbacks in free agency.

4. Keep Rosenfels on the roster.

5. Don’t just hand Tarvaris Jackson the job.

6. If Farve comes back, great. If not, hold a competition for the job.

What’s not to like?

by medicineball on Nov 3, 2009 3:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He didn't play enough to qualify last year

and his stats were padded by playing all of the weak Ds and only 2 of the good ones (weeks 1 and 2, you know, when he lost his job).

His career rating is 77.1 which is exactly identical to JaMarcus Russell’s 2008 rating which was good for 26th in the league. That means that there may be 6-7 teams which could really use Tarvaris Jackson, but that shouldn’t be the Vikings as long as they have one of the league’s highest payrolls.

Jackson’s fumble rate (14 in 19 starts) compares to Culpepper’s 2000 (11 in 16 starts) and is not quite as good as Culpepper’s 2004 (9 in 16 starts).

I’m not willing to wait until TJ is 37 to find out whether he can sustain a TD:INT ratio which is only slightly better than the great Tony Banks or not.

Here are my suggestions:
1) Let TJ become a free agent. Most likely, nobody will want him anyway. There is a small chance that some team will look at him and his combine #s and say, “Wow! That kid can move!” without realizing that he uses almost none of that ability constructively (to draw coverage off that WR he’s been staring down, etc.) and isn’t much of a pocket passer unless he’s facing one of the 10 worst secondaries in the league. He is not the next Rich Gannon, and even if that were to happen, don’t you want the Vikings to try to win a SB before TJ is 37, even if that means a different QB? That’s the idea, anyway.

2) Draft a QB each year, or at least 3 out of every 5 years, even if it’s only a flyer in the 5th-7th round until this QB issue is absolutely solved (which never really happens, see also: Tom Brady and Matt Cassel). This will only work with coaches who can run fair competitions and aren’t in constant denial about the real talent levels of said QBs on the roster, though (see also: Brooks Bollinger and Kelly Holcomb are so perfect for us that we must let Tyler Thigpen go; we can’t release JD Booty because he’s so good; etc.), and there is a big difference between using those draft picks to take flyers on guys who have already failed (that’s what cheap FA signings are for) and developing a guy who fends off competition every year for 2-5 years…no incubating a FA you needed last year for a year plus just to get used to the system, either.

3) I concur. There should be someone better than TJ and good enough, even if not as great as Favre.

4) Yes. I like Sage. I’m sure there’s someone better in FA next year, but he’s at least a good #2.

5) The only reason TJ has been handed the job was because he didn’t/couldn’t earn it in the first place.

6) A no-brainer.

The problem with your suggestion is that you start with 2 (TJ and Sage) + a FA + at least one draftee, preferably 1st or 2nd round. That’s 4 QBs. They aren’t going to be able to cut and sign a 1st or 2nd rounder onto the practice squad without someone signing him. Both the draftee and FA will be relegated to “learning the system” for at least 2010 anyway. If Favre doesn’t come back and TJ loses the competition for the starting job, then he would still be the first to be cut or dealt.

by KC Viking on Nov 3, 2009 5:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Relieving

It’s a relief you are not GM of the Vikings.

We already screwed up the Rich Gannon situation to epic, epic proportions. Do you have any idea of how costly that was to the Vikings? Now you would casually risk repeating that epic cataclysm for the second time in two decades.

Rich Gannon was drafted by the Vikings. He was with the Vikings for 6 years. Yes, he didn’t look good in that time. Then Denny Green kicked him out the door. Then he blossomed. People talk about him going into the Hall of Fame.

Do you have ANY IDEA how rare elite quarterbacks are in the NFL? Do you think Rich Gannon and Peyton Manning are available at the Circle K?

You have the same idea that Denny Green had. Oh yeah, we’ll just draft some other guy. We’ll DEVELOP anybody into the job.

Well, from roughly the Tommy Kramer/Wade Wilson era until the Daunte Culpepper era, approximately 15-20 years, the Vikings never had one long-term plan at quarterback. Randall Cunningham and Warren Moon gave the Vikings some good years, but mostly this era had lots of good teams with no franchise quarterback.

Do you have any concept of how valuable Rich Gannon would have been to the Vikings had he been kept?

In 1993, in replacement of Rich Gannon, the Vikings had Sean Salisbury and Gino Torretta on the roster.

To be great, this team needs a great quarterback. That means keeping the guys you have. Number 1 on the “keep” list is Tarvaris Jackson. That means you make sure you don’t let a diamond in the rough go.

Look at Rich Gannon’s career stats. Now go look at all the Super Bowl-winnning quarterbacks career stats. For most of them, it is not a quick road to the top.

Thank goodness you have no influence.

I am sick and tired of our good players getting run off. It happened with Rich Gannon and Randy Moss. It is stupid.

Just wait and see what happens. Patience.

by medicineball on Nov 3, 2009 5:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're making less sense with every post

The problem with your logic is that you suggest that the team should stick with the kid no matter what…for more than 6 years in Rich Gannon’s case which would have meant 6+ years of Salisbury and 6 years of Spergeon Wyn) and others…all because you assume that TJ (and every QB) is a franchise QB who will follow Rich Gannon’s career arc.

Rich Gannon was not really a franchise QB. He was a journeyman who improved with age and had a great coach at the end. He had quality receivers in MIN, too, which is why I was shocked to see so little interest in him after he performed well in KC without much of a receiving corps. And then, of course, he had a pretty great receiving corps as a Raider as well. His career arc is atypical and extremely rare.

TJ is no McNabb, nor another Jason Campbell.

I also find it ironic that you are so quick to praise and defend Brad Childress and rant about the importance of developing a franchise quarterback. Guess what? Your man, Brad Childress, is the one who got rid of the last 2 QBs who developed as Vikings: SB winner Brad Johnson and franchise QB Daunte Culpepper who has posted better ratings with worse teams than TJ has over the past 3 years.

by KC Viking on Nov 3, 2009 6:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Also

Between Gannon’s Minnesota exit and y2k, the Vikings had developed Brad Johnson, signed MVP Randall Cunningham, and drafted and developed a true franchise QB named Daunte Culpepper. It’s not like the QB position was the only thing holding the team back by then (it was the defense).

By y2k, Oakland was advancing in the playoffs with MVP Rich Gannon at the helm. The Vikings also won their division and advanced in the playoffs, and their 1st year starter (2nd year in the league) franchise QB produced 40 TDs (and he would go on to do so again and be the only player in the history of the game to have 2 such seasons). Culpepper had a monster season again in 2004, as Gannon played the last 3 games of his NFL career.

Chris Chandler is another great example of how letting go of a supposed diamond in the rough isn’t such a bad thing. The Colts drafted Chris Chandler. They gave up on him after 2 years, and he didn’t have his second great season until his 10th year in the league. By then, the Colts had found some guy named Peyton Manning. In the interim, the Bucs and Cards had given up on him, the Rams let him go even though he finally had his first great year with them…and a year after the Falcons lost the SB with Chandler, the Rams had won one and lost one with Kurt Warner. (Then Martz wanted his pet project to lead the team instead, and the Bulger era has been terrible compared to the Warner era in StL.)

Not long after that, the Bucs had won a SB with Brad Johnson while the Cards had thought that Jake Plummer was the answer and probably stuck with him too long (high draft picks like David Boston turning into a bust didn’t help, either). Plummer blossomed in Denver and even went to a Pro Bowl, but by that time the Cards had drafted a supposed franchise QB (Leinart) and picked up Warner, who led them to a Super Bowl loss.

Designating a guy as a franchise QB can be problematic. How long should TB have held onto Trent Dilfer? Kerry Collins, thought to be a franchise QB, has only had ratings of 80+ 3x, none in back-to-back seasons, and with his 3rd and 5th teams. Perhaps a better QB would have beaten the Ravens in 2000. Joey Harrington has never posted a rating of 80+ with 2 different teams.

Sometimes these diamonds in the rough are only good or better for 1 year: Steve Bono, Rob Johnson, Elvis Grbac, Steve DeBerg, Damon Huard and Jay Fiedler.

Randy Moss left Minnesota for an entirely different set of reasons, and until he wore a Patriots uni, it looked like the right move with his best years still in MN. Chilly and Wilf surely would have gotten rid of RM for personal reasons had he been on the roster anyway.

by KC Viking on Nov 4, 2009 11:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Even more important

Can your QB run your system. TJ flat out can not. He can have a passer rating of 96 because we’re running an offense that a pop warner QB could work. However, we’re losing still because we can’t do what we want to on offense. This is the reason Frerrote got put in last year. His stats were on par with TJ’s but he could handle much more of the offense and so we had more options to work with when he was at the helm.

As for sticking with your man again I bring up Ryan Leaf. For everyone that works there are a how barn full that die horrible deaths.

by Grime on Nov 5, 2009 2:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You Have to remember

Rich Gannon did not play with this kind of defense. He also did not have the luxury of AD. Tjoke has everything. He has a defense that would get the ball back. he has AD to keep the defense hornest. If you can’t see how much respect Favre bring to our QB position than you are not watching football.

The reason we have gooten no where with tjoke. Because the defense dose not respect our passing game. Now if they load up on AD. we will burn them with the pass. If they come with the blitz. We will burn them with the short slant or screen. The slant will go to the receiver. In tjoke case when he is in trouble he goes to tahi. When he goes to tahi he does not lead tahi, to give running room.TJOKE has lot to learn. In preseason they play vanilla defense. They are not going to show you much.

I know that Favre came in for only 3 day, and play in his 1st preseason. That is what a real QB playing is all about. Tjoke have been in this system for 4 years. He can’t even be better than a guy who have been here half a year. IMOP rosencopter will beat out tjoke for next season. With a year under his belt. Providing Favre does not come back.

by vikefansd on Nov 3, 2009 1:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Early 90s Vikings defense

It was great.

Maybe I’m the last Vikings’ fan to remember all my fellow fans calling for Gannon to get cut. Yeah, I was too. He looked terrible. He was inaccurate. He would not throw with touch. He couldn’t read defenses. He sucked.

Let’s just keep Tarvaris and see how it goes. It won’t cost the Vikings much.

by medicineball on Nov 3, 2009 2:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I remember a 21-point come-from-behind victory vs. the Bears

In ’90 and ’91, the defense was ranked 13th or 14th. Good, but nothing special.

by KC Viking on Nov 3, 2009 5:20 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, but

’92 to ’96 we had Dungy. Ah Dungy… He was the first D-coordinater we let go that won a ring, in my memory. Tomlinson is the second.

I shouldn’t say too much about that, I was one of Denny’s last defenders in MN I think. Even though I knew he was probably crazy, the man won football games.

Fire Childress!

by dwarg on Nov 4, 2009 12:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Very generous

I’ll admit that Brad Childress has improved as a coach. His playcalling is still vanilla at times, even with SO MUCH TALENT. Who exactly WILL he trust if not this roster? That is a fundamental problem with him. Unless he has the very best players on his team (who still wouldn’t have 100% of his confidence), his KAO doesn’t begin to perform at an average level.

Is anyone really suggesting that most coaches currently in the league would NOT have gone 10-7 with last year’s talent or beat up on a bunch of bad teams with this year’s roster? The real genius of Childress’s time here is that he tore everything down so far and made everything so vanilla that meeting any positive expectations became praiseworthy to some. Jim Zorn coached Jason Campbell into having the lowest INT% in the NFL, but he may lose his job at season’s end. Childress is supposed to be a QB guru, and he’s only had a good offense after adding a HoF QB. Childress was also responsible for hiring Ferraro, and that was a disaster. Mike Tomlin may have been the best post-Tice coach in Minnesota, and it would have been interesting to see how different the Steelers and Vikings’ paths would have gone had the coaches traded places.

I prefer to give credit where it is overdue: to Zygi Wilf for opening up the checkbook to sign those vets and to Rick Spielman (and perhaps Fran Foley) and Scott Studwell and whomever else was involved in scouting the past few drafts (although I disagree with several picks) and the Vikings’ capologist. I’m confident that the difference between Childress/Tomlin/TIce/[any competent coach] with all other things being the same vs. Red McCombs, no GM figure and no big free agents with Childress as head coach would not favor Childress.

I don’t think that all of the players you listed have been so great, either:

  • Robison was an effective situational pass rusher as a rookie and hasn’t matched that level since.
  • Cedric Griffin is a FS or NB playing CB.
  • M. Williams hasn’t exactly led the secondary to great heights, or any heights, really.
  • Tyrell Johnson has looked lost more often than he’s made plays this year.

I give credit to Childress for bringing in Artis Hicks for an R6, but that is almost canceled out by his trades for Billy McMullen, Kelly Holcomb (and Brooks Bollinger which involved a pick AND CJ Mosely, although I liked Brooks).

Don’t forget about how much better Darren Sharper has performed so far compared to Madieu or how much better the OL could be with Birk instead of J. Sullivan.

by KC Viking on Nov 2, 2009 3:26 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t like letting Birk go and wished we had hung on to him for 2-3 more years. That said, I think Sully is doing pretty well overall right now; we will have to see if he has longevity in this league yet.

Robison is what we need him to be but I agree with you on the others. I really thought T. Johnson would take another step forward this year mentally but he simply hasn’t progressed (yet??).

Wasn’t the problem with Sharper that he didn’t fit scheme-wise/physically?

by cutlassbob on Nov 2, 2009 3:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah in our scheme the safety is usually a safety (i.e. prevent the big play). Sharper is best when given a free reign to roam and create picks.

by zebano on Nov 2, 2009 3:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

ok

so how is that a compliment to Chilly and Frazier? What you said means that they knew they were imposing a restrictive system on a GREAT player and eventually let him go to thrive elsewhere. How is that anything other than 2 really awful decisions?

by KC Viking on Nov 2, 2009 4:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

so...?

Scrap your defensive philosophy and scheme to resign a 12 year veteran in the hopes that this one player can regain his magic and get a few additional picks for your D? Do you really build a defensive roster around Sharper?

At least one great decision. Sharper has become a system guy and didn’t fit in here any more.

by LoveHate on Nov 2, 2009 5:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Productivity doesn’t include INTs or PDs by d-backs in the current system. Or coverage by real CBs without ginormous cushions for that matter.

Of course, the Vikings were playing cover-2 while Tomlin was here, and somehow he managed to coach a group which included Sharper to rank 5th in defensive INTs in 2006.

by KC Viking on Nov 2, 2009 6:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sharper played bad last year

What part of Sharper’s play last year indicated that this year he would get 7 INT, return 3 for TD, and generally play awesome? Well, none.

The Vikings play a Cover-2, and Sharper doesn’t like that. It would have been nice if he fit better, but he doesn’t.

The Vikings DBs need to do a lot of learning and getting better. Our guys have enough talent. It’s a question of them playing better.

by medicineball on Nov 2, 2009 7:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Which does come back down to the coaching.

If the person has talent and still has problems with the scheme or realizing their potential in an offense or defense well they need to be better coached. I will say this I don’t know who our QB coach is but I have a hard time respecting him. or D coach knows his line but loses it the farther he goes back..

If your players are not playing to their potential look to the players work ethic first then their coaches second.

by Grime on Nov 3, 2009 7:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Frazier was a CB when he played for the Bears

When he was with the Colts, he was in charge of the D-backs.

by zebano on Nov 3, 2009 8:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

but how does that change anything for the better?

He should by that standard be able to build a strong secondary, but that has not been the case at all. He brought in M. Williams at a rate that made him one of the top 10 Viking salaries in 2008 and 2009 (and beyond, probably), and where is the production from him? He didn’t get production out of Darren Sharper, and he could go on to be a Hall of Famer! He presumably approved Cedric Griffin’s big paycheck and Antoine Winfield’s extension despite his old age despite the fact that they have not combined to be one of the best tandems in the league.

Mike Tomlin had many of the same players and managed to have a top 5 or top 10 secondary, you know.

Or maybe Dwight Smith was really all that and a bag of chips and Childress and Zygi should have held onto him despite his public display of affection.

I simply don’t see the performance from his D that I would expect to see from a great coach, particularly one whose specialty ought to be d-backs. This is his 3rd year, too, so it’s time to get it done or move on in my opinion.

by KC Viking on Nov 3, 2009 1:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Which does come back down to the coaching.

If the person has talent and still has problems with the scheme or realizing their potential in an offense or defense well they need to be better coached. I will say this I don’t know who our QB coach is but I have a hard time respecting him. or D coach knows his line but loses it the farther he goes back..

If your players are not playing to their potential look to the players work ethic first then their coaches second.

by Grime on Nov 3, 2009 7:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sharper was Sharper yesterday

Sharper played really bad until the last part of the game. He did have a critical interception in the final minute to clinch the game for the Saints.

Until then, however, he looked bad against the run. He has become a bad tackler at this stage in his career. In our defense, he wasn’t going to get that many interceptions. We’re better off with the guys we’ve got.

by medicineball on Nov 3, 2009 11:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That makes no sense to me

You say keep the bad schemes and coaches that can’t get a decent season out of a possible HoFer and that Viking defenders should be selected as if other coaches love to run as much as Chilly does which is simply not true (in fact, only 6 other teams ran 500+ times in ’08, and only 2 ran more often than the Vikings).

Did you see the Rams game? The Vikings’ secondary is AWFUL, and nothing is statistically better about these guys despite the fact that they’ve played a very easy schedule so far.

by KC Viking on Nov 3, 2009 1:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sharper lost a step

Last year he was slower, he was getting out-maneuvered and left out of position too often. When he had a bead on the ball (or ball carrier), he could drop the hammer second to none, the man was devastating. The problem was when had to stop a receiver or RB who already had the ball and was moving upfield… It was painful watching him unable to shift to follow the target and be left in the dust on some plays. I’m glad he’s in a scheme that lets him adjust better to compensate for age, but I’m going to be rooting for him to fall apart when we play the Saints :)

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 4, 2009 10:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Birk

Birk left the Vikings for less money on another team. Sullivan has done well.

by medicineball on Nov 2, 2009 7:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, that was a boneheaded move....

If you’re going to let go of your top-performing players, then at least trade them for draft picks! Even if it meant re-signing them, get something out it. Letting them go in FA is a waste.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 4, 2009 10:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure I understand this

How are you so clearly able to seperate the talent of the coach from the talent of the roster? I’m serious, I don’t get it.

Other than someone who’s coached forever (which doesnot include Chilly), what NFL coaches can you say for sure have a distinct influence on their team’s records above & beyond the talent?

by puddnhead on Nov 2, 2009 3:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You seem to get most of it

Part of my point is that it is indeed very difficult to separate a HC’s influence from his talent.

That said, I can name a few who had distinct influences over their talent levels:

  • Josh McDaniels was expected to be coaching a losing team, especially after running Jay Cutler out of town and replacing him with Kyle Orton.
  • Marvin Lewis has always gotten more out of his Bengals than they were thought capable of being because they were almost always TERRIBLE in at least one major way. Cedric Benson has gone from bust to NFL rushing leader.
  • Coaches Harbaugh (BAL) and Ryan (NYJ) and Smith (ATL) recently had successful seasons with rookie QBs, and that’s no small feat. Smith’s team was rebuilt through FA, but that shouldn’t count against him if Chilly gets credit for big FA signings.
  • MIA coach’s name escapes me, but nobody thought that the Dolphins would win last year.
  • I think I’d rather have Ken Whisenhunt or Mike Tomlin, to name just 2 more.
  • (that is enough to rule out Childress as a top 8/top 25% NFL HC.)
  • Bill Belichick hasn’t had a strong RB or even much of a running game in his NE tenure. Wes Welker was a nobody before arriving in town, and nobody else made serious bids on Randy Moss who was considered to be washed up. Before the current receiving corps, they had a lot of ho-hum receivers and more of a system. Once different types of talent arrived, they seem to have adjusted their system.
  • Bill Walsh (Joe Montana may have otherwise been an ok weak-armed QB elsewhere)
  • Marv Levy’s Bills (rather than impose a system onto his very talented QB and force him to adjust to his system, they developed the K-Gun together, and Kelly ended up calling most of his own plays) were always overachievers.
  • Denny Green didn’t have a defense in his best W-L seasons, and his decision to take a knee rather than throw downfield in 1998 negatively influenced the team despite the (offensive) talent level. Before that, he had run a QB carousel (again, without a real defense) and still managed to contend for the division title and beyond. Other coaches’ careers came and went with new QBs.

by KC Viking on Nov 2, 2009 4:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Also
  • In 2001, Denny Green led the Vikings to an 11-5 season. The Vikings were not among the highest payrolls (22nd). He was fired the following year for having a losing record with the very lowest payroll (this also highlights what a good job Tice did, given what little he had to work with other than Culpepper and Moss). When Chilly led the 2006 team to a 6-10 record (following a winning season), he had the 2nd highest payroll. When Chilly led last year’s team to a 10-7 one-and-done year, he had the benefit of the 3rd highest payroll. Of course, the Vikings were not the 3rd or 4th or even 5th best team in the NFL last year, unfortunately.
  • The Ravens were a playoff team last year despite the 31st payroll.
  • The Patriots won 11 games last year in a tough division with the 30th payroll.
  • The Falcons were a playoff team with the 25th ranked payroll.
  • Gruden and the Bucs had a winning record with the 23rd ranked payroll in 2008.
  • The Colts were a 12-4 playoff team despite the 29th payroll in 2008.
  • The Eagles were a playoff winner with the 21st payroll in 2008.
  • The Chargers were a playoff team with the 19th payroll in 2008.
  • The Carolina Panthers were a division-winning playoff team in 2008 with the 17th payroll.
  • Washington had an 8-8 (average) record with the 18th (below average) payroll.
  • Houston had an 8-8 (average) record with the 22nd (below average) payroll.
  • Denver had an 8-8 record with the 27th (below average) payroll.
  • Miami was a division winning playoff team with the 15th payroll.
  • The Giants won 12 games in a tough division with the 14th payroll.
  • The Steelers, Titans, and Cardinals ranked 6th, 7th, and 8th in payroll, respectively, and won more games than the Vikings.
  • That’s a short list (16, or half the league) of teams that achieved more with less, and there are more, but

by KC Viking on Nov 2, 2009 5:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Fan Post

You should do a fan post about it.

Line up the 32 payroll rankings with where the team wound up and their record. It’d be interesting to see if payroll = performance.

by JasonAve6413 on Nov 2, 2009 6:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

conclusion?

But what conclusion to draw? That payroll does not = performance, or that quality coaching does? Or that quality coaching and young talent trump quality coaching and FA veterans? It’s tough to know causality, but it is one measuring stick for evaluating coaches.

by KC Viking on Nov 2, 2009 8:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for these posts KC Viking

I already went through this in another post and I was waiting to see if there was someone out there who actually remembers what it is a coach is supposed to do.

It’s amazing Chili underachieves for 3 years, then after stacking a roster with pro-bowlers and a future hall-of-famer and suddenly he’s a brilliant coach. By this logic Chili could be a great personnel director, but it tells us very little about his coaching ability. Norv Turner would have just as much success with this roster as Chili… Dare I say it’s even possible Les Steckle could probably get to .500 with them.

Fire Childress!

by dwarg on Nov 3, 2009 8:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Weird, the body of my post got eaten.

So I’ll post it again.

I already went through this same topic in another post and I was waiting to see if there was someone out there who actually remembers what it is a coach is supposed to do.

It’s amazing Chili underachieves for 3 years, then after stacking a roster with pro-bowlers and a future hall-of-famer suddenly he’s a brilliant coach. By this logic Chili could be a great personnel director, but it tells us very little about his coaching ability. Norv Turner would have just as much success with this roster as Chili… Dare I say it’s even possible Les Steckel could probably get to .500 with this team.

I think Chili has gotten better as a coach, but it’s hard to gauge how much better when we’ve got the deck stacked in our favor to this degree. Not that Chili should be punished because we have great players, but there are a lot of other people involved in signing and scouting players, so spread that credit around. Studwell in scouting, Rick “Poison Pill” Spielmen in player personnel and, I think, most importantly Zygi for opening the purse strings to sign guys like Jared Allen, and Steve Hutchenson; or even overpay guys like Bernard Barrian, Madieu Williams, and Rosenfels. The Vikings have a win now mentality and sometimes that means overpaying guys, which will cost us later, but Zygi’s been willing to do it. So I give him a lot of the credit.

I still haven’t seen much from Childress that I would call good coaching.

Fire Childress!

by dwarg on Nov 3, 2009 9:16 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Weird, the body of my post got eaten.

So I’ll post it again.

I already went through this same topic in another post and I was waiting to see if there was someone out there who actually remembers what it is a coach is supposed to do.

It’s amazing Chili underachieves for 3 years, then after stacking a roster with pro-bowlers and a future hall-of-famer suddenly he’s a brilliant coach. By this logic Chili could be a great personnel director, but it tells us very little about his coaching ability. Norv Turner would have just as much success with this roster as Chili… Dare I say it’s even possible Les Steckel could probably get to .500 with this team.

I think Chili has gotten better as a coach, but it’s hard to gauge how much better when we’ve got the deck stacked in our favor to this degree. Not that Chili should be punished because we have great players, but there are a lot of other people involved in signing and scouting players, so spread that credit around. Studwell in scouting, Rick “Poison Pill” Spielmen in player personnel and, I think, most importantly Zygi for opening the purse strings to sign guys like Jared Allen, and Steve Hutchenson; or even overpay guys like Bernard Barrien, Madieu Williams, and Rosenfels. The Vikings have a win now mentality and sometimes that means overpaying guys, which will cost us later, but Zygi’s been willing to do it. So I give him a lot of the credit.

I still haven’t seen much from Childress that I would call good coaching.

Fire Childress!

by dwarg on Nov 3, 2009 9:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry

My browser had cached the old style sheet and my posts weren’t showing up.

Fire Childress!

by dwarg on Nov 3, 2009 9:20 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

really?

You really want to take about player development? How about these guys developing in the Childress era?

Sullivan, McKinnie, EJ Henderson, Greenway, Cedric Griffin, Naufahu Tahi, Sidney Rice, Visanthe Shiancoe, Adrian Peterson, Percy Harvin, and Tarvaris Jackson. All of them have significantly improved as players while with the Vikings in the Childress era.

Obviously, Peterson had his gifts when he got to the Vikings, but he is now a better runner, an OK pass protector, and good catching the ball out of the backfield.

Brooks Bollinger hasn’t peaked in his career. He is the quarterback for the UFL Florida Tuskers, who have a perfect record entering into the championship game. People are saying he will get another chance in the NFL.

You seem to be saying that Childress is not developing the players. We’re both watching the Minnesota Vikings, right? The NFL?

by medicineball on Nov 3, 2009 5:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Player development?

Sullivan: best remembered for a poor snap vs. GB which thankfully didn’t cost the game and weak play in the first 2-3 weeks.

Greenway, Griffin, Rice, AP, Harvin: wait…first you credit him with drafting these great talents, then you want to also assume that they would be nothing special without him. It’s probably more a credit to drafting these guys, which should be shared with the rest of the front office and scouting dept. A year ago, nobody would be saying how great Rice is because he was terrible for a time. I’ll grant anyone that AP may not have led the league in rushing on a team that didn’t care to run him as often. Given his inury history and the career arcs of guys like Jamaal Anderson and Larry Johnson, it seems like instant gratification and not such a great idea long-term to me. AP is usually subbed out when the Vikes plan to pass which adds to the of the problem of Chilly’s predictably vanilla playcalling.

Cedric Griffin has gotten credit as a tough tackling machine while also being a laughingstock for getting beat deep and allowing the biggest cushion in the NFL. A very strong case could be made that Griffin is perhaps a Pro Bowl free safety (where he played a significant amount of time in college) who has been forced into non-PB level CB duties by Childress. I was hoping to see the Vikings release him rather than re-sign him so that he could strut his stuff as a FS elsewhere (as long as it wasn’t in the NFC North). (Tice knew to move Chavous from CB to safety, and Chavous became a Pro Bowler, remember that? Why does Chilly deserve credit for doing the opposite?)

McKinnie and EJ Henderson developed during the Tice era. Draftniks wanted the Vikes to take Ryan Sims instead of Mount McKinnie. Henderson was a steal in the 2nd round after winning the Butkus award.

Shiancoe developed as a Giant and may have learned a thing or two from that Jeremy Shockey guy and whomever was coaching them.

TJ hasn’t become the next Donovan McNabb, and that’s what Chilly said he’d drafted.

Perhaps Chilly has developed Tahi from waiver-wire fodder to unspectacular marginal starter at FB, but that’s assuming that someone like Kleinsasser had nothing to do with it. I’ll bet Jimmy K or T-Rich had something constructive to say along the way.

Speaking of fullbacks, remember the big 5-year deal to former Eagle Thomas Tapeh? That is another perfect example of how badly Chilly can miss, even on guys he’s known for years.

by KC Viking on Nov 3, 2009 5:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Naufahu Tahi?

Seriously… Naufahu Tahi?… That’s what you’re going with… Naufahu Tahi… The man who was injured by a locker and couldn’t play against the Packers on Sunday?

Or to quote Jim Souhan:

Tahi inactive for Vikes. No more Tahi in Space. No more Explosive Plays by Tahi. What will the Vikes do when they need 1 yard on 3rd-and-8?

Wait, wait, wait… I almost forgot… BROOKS BOLLINGER!!!! Because he’s looking good in the UFL? Umm… wow.

Well you’ve run circles around me logically. Well played sir… well played.

Fire Childress!

by dwarg on Nov 4, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Passes you... a towel

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 4, 2009 11:20 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wipes the tears from his eyes >

Thanks man.

Fire Childress!

by dwarg on Nov 4, 2009 11:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Les Steckel

That name hurts…wait then Bud will come back the year after….

it is better to be thought of as dumb then to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Ben Franklin

by montana vikes fan on Nov 3, 2009 11:01 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow. Not every trade was a goldmine?

You’re kidding me. I thought a coach had to make one goldmine trade after another or that coach was doing a bad job.

The Vikings have been very aggressive in bringing in talent and improving the team. The talent evaluation has been rock solid. The only big flaw—and some say was a good move—was not re-signing Darren Sharper. Meanwhile, tons of great personnel decisions have been made. The result is the best Vikings team in years.

by medicineball on Nov 2, 2009 7:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Darren Sharper was unemployed for a while this spring...

Sharper is on my short list for comeback player of the year… No way to know he’d explode this year again…

by ctowner35 on Nov 3, 2009 10:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not every transaction needs to be great, but why so many bad moves if he's so great?

But when a self-proclaimed QB guru and offensive coordinator with a philosophy of making the most out of small talents makes that many moves to NOT meet the objective, then questions should be asked. The worst thing was that those trades were not necessarily made to add talent as they were to get familiar faces (Holcomb, McMullen, and Hicks had worked with Chilly, Bollinger was a Wisconsin QB while either both Chilly and/or Bevell were there). It’s either that or Chilly had been around 3/4 of them quite a bit and STILL misgauged their talent level by a huge margin.

As soon as one sticks one’s head out of one’s Chilly bubble and examines similar moves that other coaches made, one will see a major difference: good coaches made trades to acquire talent first, sometimes passing over guys they’d worked with.

Dick Vermeil, for instance, wanted to bring QB Trent Green with him, and that turned out well. Not just Artis Hicks well, but Pro Bowl well. And that wasn’t the only move he made! He also brought in RB Priest Holmes and WR/KR Dante Hall (both went on to have Pro Bowl years, too!) and WR Eddie Kennison put up the best numbers of his career in a Chiefs uni after a brief retirement, too. Vermeil even inherited a worse team (7-9 in 2000) than Chilly did (9-7 in 2005).

Prior to that, Vermeil had led the Rams to a SB Championship (and really another appearance even though Mike Martz vultured the credit for that one) with a team that had busted on a high #1 draft choice (RB Lawrence Phillips), traded 2nd and 5th round picks for Marshall Faulk, brought in Kurt Warner as a castoff from at least 2 other teams, and suffered a season-ending injury to their free agent golden boy anointed starter, Trent Green. Vermeil’s first major move was to trade 4 draft picks to the Jets in order to draft T Orlando Pace first overall (cheaper than the Hutchinson move). In his 3rd draft with the Rams, he selected WR Torry Holt in the first round. (Do you think that Percy Harvin = Torry Holt? Or that Chester = Faulk?)

Jeff Fischer’s moves would make quite a story, too, and so would most quality head coaches’.

by KC Viking on Nov 3, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

once again its the system darren shaper is in

 did not fit in to the system here plus they switched his postion

by Vikant on Nov 2, 2009 9:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Childress is supposed to be a QB guru, and he’s only had a good offense after adding a HoF QB.

This is a big concern of mine. The KAO finally works, but largely because they’ve finally taken the keys out of Chilly’s hands and given it to the QB. That’s great. Problem is, Chilly probably has one of maybe two guys on the planet (the other being McNabb) playing QB he’d trust enough to do this. What happens when Favre rides off in the sunset? Do we go back to the frustration levels we had watching QBs try to play while constantly looking over their shoulder?

I think in most cases it’s foolish to make franchise-level decisions in direct reaction to how the team is playing over a limited sample. I think there’s some truth to the phrase ‘never as good as you think when you’re winning and never as bad as you think when you’re losing." In other words, just as it’s generally too kneejerk to fire a coach off to a poor start, so also it’s kneejerk to extend a guy off to a great start.

So yes, I’m still skeptical of our scheme disciple. I’d still like to see Chilly make a postseason run, for instance. Or win a game he’s not really expected to. Or develop a true franchise QB…

by jianfu on Nov 2, 2009 10:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve definitely lightened up on Chilly this year. At times I’ve thought his playcalling was way too conservative, but after reviewing the play by play of games, I’ve been wrong.

In the Packer game, there were several moments when I thought the O would go into Chilly-ball and try to run out the clock w/ a 14 pt lead in the 1st half, or just play for a field goal once inside the 30. Instead, we threw, we got first downs, and we went for it on 4th and 1 more than once.

In some “intangibles” – our penalties seem to be down quite a bit, players seem to be hustling more (Lewis holding a block on Percy’s TD catch, AD running down for a block, Sullivan running down the field for 30 yards on the screen to AD…), and as someone else noted, it seems like it’s more of a TEAM than a bunch of invdividuals.

I don’t know which came first – the attitude or the winning, but I love the cycle!

GO VIKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by JasonAve6413 on Nov 2, 2009 4:21 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

As much as I would love to dump on Chilly

like I have in the past, the truth is that I cannot.

We are 7-1, and look to be getting better as the season progresses.

We have stars and future stars scattered about on both sides of the ball. And Chilly is a part of reason why.

Still, I know full well in the back of my mind that the clock is going to strike midnight at some point, and we will crash back down to earth, with TJack and Sage. I am just crossing my fingers and hoping that day doesn’t come anytime soon.

I am just going to ride this awesome wave out and enjoy it for as long as possible!!

by Sonic on Nov 2, 2009 5:04 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'm still holding my breath!!

It seems like Chilly runs a basic offensive set that allows players to execute based on thier ability. Once a lead has been built, or obtained late in a game, he then goes about trying to defend the lead or run out the clock. Frankly, it frustrates the hell out of me, and if were’nt for shut down guys like Allen and Favre we’d be in trouble. I think he needs to keep putting the corn cobs to it unitl the end.

by BigShoes on Nov 2, 2009 6:33 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

TtHE COOACH IS PART OF THE TEAM

I was like everyone else wondering why the Vikes couldn’t be more successful. Was it the coach or the quarterback? Was our secondary weak? Did we have a bad offensive line? No teamwork?

It is obvious to me that this coach did what he had to do until he had the players to run his offensive and defensive scheme. The vital missing peice was the QB. I thought bringing in a forty year old QB was insane. Wow, did coach prove me wrong. The decisions on the field that Farve makes is absolutely essential to running this offense. No wonder a young T-Jax couldn’t make it run this smooth. Add Harvin and we have real weapons. Especially on special teams. What a difference.

Did 31 other teams think that Loadholt would be a #1 starter? Would they have given up on Birk for a young Sullivan. Good decisions all. Mayby not perfect for this year but we have young talent set for the future. I believe Chester Taylor is the only free agent contract up this year. And I think he can be Franchised if need be. What a great roster for the next few years.

Chilly knows how important a future QB is to this team. Lets trust them to continue to build. And while it lasts lets just enjoy the moment.

by lifelongvike on Nov 2, 2009 8:22 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Honestly I would like to have seen C. Taylor traded. He is a great backup and good insurance for A.D. but RB is a position where you can easily get young talent right out of college and save some money. Peterson is clearly a gamebreaker and worthy of extra money, but short of him, Chris Johnson and perhaps Ray Rice, I don’t believe any backs in this league are really worth a large chunk of a teams money.

by zebano on Nov 3, 2009 8:50 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hard to trade

CT’s contract is up this year. He will be a free agent. Hard to trade a player with no contract.

by lifelongvike on Nov 6, 2009 4:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So re-sign him, then trade him :)

Just kidding. I think we should keep CT, actually, although Albert Young is nearly ready to step up.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 6, 2009 7:07 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

BC did

rebuild the team…in his 2nd year he had the Vikes in the hunt for a playoff spot…3rd year Won the North…and now has the team at 7-1 and going to win the North again…he has built a smash mouth team…I like Chilly ball…and we will only keep improving…maybe we dont win the SB this season…or next..its hard to win a SB you need a great team and a lot of luck…but I like winning…and the chance at going and winning one every year…BC has brought that to the Vikes.

by vikefan1969 on Nov 8, 2009 8:47 AM CST reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!
Start posting about the Vikings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dodge_front_small
Comparing '98 to '09, Defense
Vikings_logo_small
FOX wants to nickname the Vikings defensive line
Dodge_front_small
Good-Bye, Bad-Bye

Recent FanPosts

Viking_flag_small
The Beginning of the End
Vikings_small
Place Your Bets...Cutler
Vikings_small
Place Your Bets...Rodgers
Throwdpeterson_small
Quick Fun: Vote: Best Favre Photo!
Percy-harvin_small
Greatest Picks Part 2 (56-09)
Small
We have built it, they will come
Throwdpeterson_small
Update: More Videos! ENJOY!
Small
Iraqi Militants Are Favre Fans???
Favre_viking_small
Hasselbeck loved being the understudy.
Small
I would

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Head Coach

Dailynorseman_small Gonzo

Coordinators

Me_at_the_vikings_game_small ericj69

Childress_small Anthony21