Daily Norseman: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Baby Boilers no more: Michigan State-Purdue Preview

Those who were against the Favre signing



I was wondering if you've been able to reconcile yout anti-Favre feelings halfway through the season and are you on board with the move now, or are you still against the move?  If so, why?  I'm genuinely interested in hearing what your opposition is.

Star-divide

I still have friends that are trying to compartmentalize their anti-Favre feelings as they watch what is possibly the greatest Vikings team in over 10 years.  For full disclosure, I was on board with signing Favre from the beginning and have been ecstatic to see what's transpired on the field to this point.  And I'm on board right now for him coming back next year, if he wants to and if he's healthy.  And if he does the drama of the retire/unretire I honestly won't give two hoots in hell.

And if he helps lead the Vikings to a Su--...a really big victory late, late in the year, I'm going to be leading the drive to retire his number as a Viking.  Really, I think I might.

This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.

0 recs  |  Comment 109 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I still despise the man as a person. I still feel his motives were suspect…though the results were spectacular. I am enjoying the fun while it lasts because deep down I feel the long-term effect of this move will be iffy at best…

by Half Dozen Patriarchs on Nov 3, 2009 5:44 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

TJax

I would feel a whole lot better if I thought that TJax was soaking all this in on the sideline and that it would make him a better QB. But if my spidey senses are working, he ain’t pickin up what Favre is layin down. So when Favre is gone next year, back to square one. Win it all this year or nothin.

by BigShoes on Nov 3, 2009 6:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

My feeling is

It is Sage who is the one taking this opportunity afforded him. Only time will truely tell.

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Nov 3, 2009 6:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, only time will tell.

Ignore what you see on the sidelines during the game. Sage and Tjack both have jobs to do, and Sage’s job requires him to have more contact with Favre during the game.

Remember the Favre to Lewis play? After the play Tjack was the first guy Favre looked for after getting off the field while Sage stood off in the distance.

I wonder who has the better relationship with Favre?

by Bjorno on Nov 3, 2009 8:57 PM CST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

True, to an extent. I remember when Gannon was a 3rd stringer and doing the secretary job, as well as a few other QB’s that had many good years. Im not concentrating on what I see on TV when the D is out there, my gut is telling me he may be absorbing as much as he can.

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Nov 3, 2009 9:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He's no doubt learning

the question is how much

by Salty on Nov 3, 2009 9:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

How is that bad?

All or none this year vs. none or none for the next several years?

The Favre signing was an admission that TJ is not going to be very good. There will be other FA QBs better than TJ and not quite as good as Favre.

by KC Viking on Nov 4, 2009 11:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He only won 1 in GB in 16 years....

If he could win a Super….., thingy, type, really big game way late in the season his first year here. I’d fly to Canton to read his speech for him. I love Fran Tark, but I’d switch and get a Favre tattoo if he wins that one big game that we aren’t talking about. Damn….it’d be like kissing my sister, but I am from North of Brainerd anyway, so what the hell.

But until then, he’s a hired hand with a job to do. I don’t care how he feels, or what his past was like, or who hates him. Just stick it to the Pack, and get us deep into the playoffs.

by BigShoes on Nov 3, 2009 5:44 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I always wondered about the sister thing the few times I visited the race track as a kid. ;-) lol

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Nov 3, 2009 6:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Other good QB's with 1 SB ring only

Steve Young
Peyton Manning
Eli Manning
Kurt Warner

Just goes to show…
It’s REALLY tough to get to the game and win it…

by mjmrad on Nov 4, 2009 12:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So you don't respect Marino?

He never won one.
Fran never won one.
Same with Fouts
etc.

Favre led them there 2x, and there aren’t many QBs in the history of the game who can say that:
Tark, Bradshaw, Warner, Montana, Favre, Brady, Elway, Staubach, Bob Griese, Starr, Dawson, Plunkett, Simms, Theismann, Kelly, Aikman, Roethlisberger. Throw in any number of his other accomplishments (like the consecutive starts) and he’s in a class by himself. It’s still a team game, so Super Bowl wins aren’t a very good measure of a QB’s quality.

by KC Viking on Nov 4, 2009 12:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He's just spouting the usual crap that ignoramuses that forget about "any given sunday" & that "its a team sport" spout

This “if you don’t win a Superbowl then you suck” logic has always baffled me, and whenever I hear someone spout it, I usually instantly lose respect for their opinions.

Say something like “So Eway sucked the first 14 years of his career, even though he ws MVP etc, but then miraculous he finally became a great quarterback the last two years — infinitely greater QB than he had been before?” and they usually go silent.

If not then you just throw up Elway’s stats for those last two years (very pedestrian, he was definitely a game manger for TD by then) and that should do it.

by puddnhead on Nov 4, 2009 2:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Elway

I agree with everything else you wrote, but John Elway was probably at his best in his last 6 years. His single-season career high in terms of passer rating was 93.0 in his final year. He ended his career with 3 consecutive Pro Bowls. Jus’ sayin’.

by KC Viking on Nov 4, 2009 3:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Was against it,

still am, though I fully support him and the team. We’ll see how he continues to perform, we had no doubt he’d start off fine. It’s how he would end that was the problem. I still think I would have preferred Garcia over any available QB this off season, he was the only one I was comfortable with the Vikings signing. If Favre doesn’t implode down the stretch, then I guess it worked out, but I’m still leery.

Go Nevada Wolf Pack!

by BacksThePack on Nov 3, 2009 6:51 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Garcia?

LOL. Please.

Like Garcia has never imploded.

by dsludo on Nov 3, 2009 6:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I would have preferred Garcia as well.

He still can play, can still scramble and he would not have had the hoopla associated with the Favre signing.

But he does imploded from time to time.

by Bjorno on Nov 3, 2009 8:59 PM CST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Not saying Garcia is bad

but no way Garcia makes some of the throws that Favre has made.

"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."

--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre

by MilCardFan on Nov 3, 2009 9:04 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

+1

Besides, the problem everyone seems to gripe about is the likelihood of Favre retiring after only 1 year. Garcia could do the same without making the same quality of contribution.

by KC Viking on Nov 4, 2009 12:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Took me a second to realize...

that this post was made by a Vikings fan.

One look at your name and I figured you were a Packers fan! ugh! :-)

by EasternVike on Nov 4, 2009 5:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hell yeah.

I’d love to retire his number as a Viking, regardless of how we do this season, just to screw with the packer fans a little more.

Fire Childress!

by dwarg on Nov 3, 2009 6:53 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

LOL, good point

Yeah, that would piss them off immeasurably, wouldn’t it?

"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."

--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre

by MilCardFan on Nov 3, 2009 7:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Put him in the ring of honor as a Viking....

….before Green Bay gets the chance to. That would be pretty damn funny :)

by noblepete on Nov 3, 2009 9:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

HA!

I love that idea!

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?" -Joe Kapp

by less cowbell, more 'neau on Nov 4, 2009 3:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

My thoughts

My original thought of not wanting Favre was not that he is a former Packer and that should mean anyone who was a Packer should never be a Vikings. I think we were smart in getting Longwell, a kicker who I think has been one of the best over the last 10 years. Another plus was the signing of Sharper…..and I will leave that for another post I’ve been thinking of writing. My concern about the signing of Favre came down to two items:

Age being a factor
Injuries being a factor

Yes, I am happily surprised and ecstatic of how well the Vikings have responded. Yes, it has become apparent it is indeed an upgrade over Jackson. So, going into the bye week, has our current fortunes changed my thoughts on the matter…..yes……

and no.

Favre has had a stellar first half of the season, as he did last year. But everyone knew in the 2nd half of last year, something was wrong. His rating went down, his TD’s went down and his INT’s went up. That’s when we learned of the injury. That can definitely happen here again this year. Age could also become a factor late in the season if his body starts to wear. So far this season, Sullivan and Loadholt have been improving and I think been doing a good job so far. Yes, both have had snaffo’s. I’ m sure if we went back into the vault, Birk had his own F-up’s his first few years. So that does limit the possible injury aspect. He does seem to be in good health so far and staying away from mistakes. So far, so good, no age factor and no injury factor. However, I still wont rule on a whole season when only half has been played. Anyone would have too admit that those two factors can still come into play, wiping out what has transpired up to date. While I am ecstatic, enthused, happy, I still have my concerns in the back of the head keeping things in check. As I stated in the past, If we do win “The game”, I will be more then happy to admit that much and welcome him back at 41.

So, if some think I’m still being a downer just because I have my concerns, wah. If some think I’m reneging on my thoughts before the season started, wah. I am enjoying the success that the Vikings and Favre are having and hoping this keeps up all the way till Feb. On the flip side, if something happens, I won’t be going “haha, told you so.” I still want to be wrong and still want the Vikings getting a ring.

May the 2nd half be as fruitful as the 1st.

SKOL

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Nov 3, 2009 7:19 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Nice post

Much appreciated. My main concern was the QB position long term, but my rationale is if the short term works out as well as I hope, I honestly don’t care if they go 0-16 for the next two years. I’ll just watch re-runs of the 2009 season.

In all seriousness, though, what happens to not only QB, but DT, LB, and LT (McKinnie is almost a 10 year vet) really determined, almost forced, Chilly’s hand in going all-in for Favre. Opportunities to seriously contend for championships don’t come along very often, and when the window opens widest, like I believe it did when the Vikes signed Favre, you must make the most of that opportunity.

I never bought the team cancer thing. New York was a weird deal for him; I felt once he was in a place he wanted to be, he would assimilate well, and he has.

I hope the press is sucking on their schism over that one, lol.

"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."

--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre

by MilCardFan on Nov 3, 2009 8:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

I’ve come to the conclusion that the whole fiasco in N.Y. was more of the cancer of the coaching staff in place at the time. Seemed all players were unhappy then. Now they are singing alof of praises for Ryan there so seems to have a whole different attitude. As I have looked around, there are some of those on other teams that could become our long term solutions that I hope are explored. I am in no way fond of what I see in Tebow and hope we pass up on that. But I think as for QB’s, we would be alright raiding the other teams “storage shelves” if you will. I would say the next two drafts we concentrate on those positions you stated and I will agree with as the D seems to have slowed a bit this year.

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Nov 3, 2009 9:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

How many QBs have missed time or are seriously banged up this year?

There are already a few. Heck Rodgers has several problems including both feet.

Favre played last Sunday with a strained groin and the lingering effects of a virus. He was absolutely crushed last year with the Jets. If that happens a lot this year, he like all the other QBs will probably be injured.

by Salty on Nov 3, 2009 9:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1 on nice post
That’s when we learned of the injury. That can definitely happen here again this year.

I believe if it was going to happen with the arm, it would have happened early on while he was healing. I think he’s getting stronger by the look of his speed and distance on the ball. # of passes per game with plenty of zip on it at the end of games speaks well, too. The O’line has taken very good care of him since week 4. That will reduce the chance of injury as well as anything.
Let’s not be quick to forget how well he answers the bell. I don’t think for a second he’ll force himself to play if he can’t help the team to win – Jets tried that last year w/ him. Lesson learned.

I think the Vikes owe that surgeon big time – he did a great job on the ’ol cannon. Maybe Chilly can serve him on his next flight…LOL

by jshep on Nov 4, 2009 11:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Favre's legs are more an issue than his arm

And I think he does too, as well as Elway and Jaws and others that know about these things firsthand. That lack of off-season conditioning is already showing up as an issue — listen to the interviews he did with Bradshaw and Mariucci last weekend and you hear him talking about how it’s taking him a while to recoup from each game.

by puddnhead on Nov 4, 2009 2:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice

Unlike you I always want Favre. We need a real vet to mentor our young QB. yes even Rosencopter is young. He have at least 5 good years.
    The last good QB we have to mentor is Sir Fransis. It was un fortunenate that Tommy was was not healthy. If you look at the league. The team that does not have QB problem are the one with good mentoring: colts, pat, SF in the 80s, greengbay,Giants(Simms/hostedler, and so much more. Yes i said Greenbay. R4F is right. Brett really help Arron. Like all young QB he want to start. I belive that Favre can do the same for us that he did for Greenbay. Vikings football is really lucky to get Favre. I think he is the best at reading the blitz.. So many time we bring the bltiz against him and he burn us.
     Bottom line is Rosencopter and tjoke have a really good opotunity to learn from Favre. I think Rosencopter is going to win. He is more mature. IMOP he is smarter.

by vikefansd on Nov 4, 2009 2:15 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

From the get go, this was a power move. Chilly understands the age of some of our defensive and offensive stud lineman, and that this may be one of our only shots. With our Run offense and defense last year, the only thing inhibiting a deep run was a lack of a 4th quarter quarterback. Tjack may become an average back in the nfl, but as we all know, when the games on the line, or if the vikes are down, Jackson can’t win.
  
The Favre move was risky with Brett’s history of late season collapses, but kudos to the front office for taking into account that our schedule is probably the softest in years and recognizing that Brett accells in climate controlled environments.

It really is Super Bowl or bust. Who know’s how many years winfield and the williams have left, and with ray edwards approaching free agency, our defense could be in for some massive rebuilding years. I like the leadership brett is bringing to this team; our receivers are sure benefiting from it. But without favre we’re an above average team, with just an above average chance of winning it all. Just like last year.

When Favre leaves minnesota, i think there will be a lasting positive impact on our team, something they can build on, and hopefully we can draft the next Matt Ryan in the future.

Early on I was wary of the move, with last year’s Jets collapse still in my mind. My attitude was pretty simple though, if he gets us to the Superbowl, it will be all worth it.

by lioninacoma on Nov 3, 2009 7:22 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Good points
Early on I was wary of the move, with last year’s Jets collapse still in my mind. My attitude was pretty simple though, if he gets us to the Superbowl, it will be all worth it.

Gotta win it. I’ll be suicidal (from a sports standpoint) if the Vikes go 0-5 in the big game.

"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."

--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre

by MilCardFan on Nov 3, 2009 8:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Should of clarified that, yeah.

by lioninacoma on Nov 3, 2009 8:57 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

If we got there

IND – I think we win a nail-biter
DEN – We win
BAL – We win
PIT – We win

NE – I think we’d lose this one

by mjmrad on Nov 4, 2009 12:07 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

If we get to the dance, we have to be ready to take home the prize…..No half assed play, minimize mistakes, and a bit of football God grace for the other 4 losses….

I would rather be IN the Arena than watching from the stands...That is my life!
* Read Teddy Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" if you need further explanation...

by vikingfanfrom afar on Nov 4, 2009 6:04 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I was anti-Favre for a lot of reasons. VikesFaninNM gave some of them, and until the season’s over those can’t be judged.

What I was definitely wrong about was being a cancer to the team. I thought all of the Favre hoopla and it being “Favre’s Team” instead of the Vikings would break up the locker a room a bit. Sitting at 7-1, though… winning calms all that down and the guys seem to like him and not let it bother them.

I was also wrong (so far) about his tendency for interceptions. So far he’s doing fan-f’ng-tastic in that regard and not forcing many throws.

The decision to get Favre is working so far, but some of my concerns can still manifest (age, injury, falling apart, crucial INTs). The view from the top is pretty damn nice, though!

GO VIKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by JasonAve6413 on Nov 3, 2009 7:43 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Apparently I like to write “so far” a lot!

by JasonAve6413 on Nov 3, 2009 7:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It seems so, so far…

by Salty on Nov 3, 2009 9:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Favre has been doing a good job of letting the team win & not forcing too much

…at least to some extent. Favre will make it through the entire season if the O-Line can protect him (like they have) and his receivers make plays (like they have). Oh yeah and Peterson takes a lot of the load and pressure.

This team is starting to believe, and although Favre has had to use some of his “magic” (SF) or use his arm (Pitt.)… this team is starting to rise to the occasion (Miami). Let the chemistry continue to build, I like what were watching. Especially when Winefield comes back

by solafide on Nov 3, 2009 8:08 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I know what you mean

Watching the MIN/GB game again tonight on NFL Network reminded me of the main reason things got out of control in GB – Sapp and Peymah were missing WAY too many tackles…

by mjmrad on Nov 4, 2009 12:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I was never against him coming here for fear of poor performance or that he was the face of our rival for 16 years.

I was against him because I feel his age will be a detriment to us in the last half of the season, especially if we have to play in an outdoor stadium.

I had no doubts that he would lead our team to a strong start, and that he would probably have one of his best seasons considering the weapons he has around him.

But Favre will be Favre. I know as much as Chilly likes to think he has control of him and that he will be able to keep him from doing too much, in the end it will be Favre calling the shots.

Who is going to argue with the guy the way he has been playing?

It has already started. Remember the “pitch count”? 51 attempts is not what was agreed upon at the beginning of the year. He was supposed to be kept on a short leash as far as how many time he throws the ball.

This is AP’s team, have we forgotten that fact? I like keeping his touches down, but with the “famine, famine, feast” running style that he has, we are not getting as many feasts.

Eventually Favre’s age is going to catch up with him, and it is going to happen at a time that we need him most. The whole reason we allowed him to skip training camp (yes, Chilly allowed him to skip camp. The deal was done long before his arrival at winter park.) was to keep him from wearing out early.

I was happy during the first few games, we sat him late once the game was well in hand. But I haven’t seen that in the last few games, well the ones that we should have.

Chilly does not have control, and Favre will do what he wants to do. His mind tells him that he can do this all year, and we know he will try. But he can’t.

Someone from our team needs to step up and tell Favre that we need him in December and January more than we need him now.

by Bjorno on Nov 3, 2009 8:49 PM CST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

re: skipping training camp.

OK… I’ll admit that I generally believe people when they make a ‘public’ statement, but I also have a pretty good sense of when I’m being bullshitted, too.
If you haven’t seen the interview with Mooch yet, check it out...

Favre is clear that when Childress called before camp, he didn’t think his arm was healed/didn’t think it was going to be worth the effort to join the Vikings… and then his 10yo daughter told him she wanted him to play and win a Superbowl… but Brett though it was too late. When Childress called him late into camp and asked again, Brett was ready to give it a shot… and ready to play for his daughter – his primary reason for coming back this year.

I BELIEVE...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Nov 3, 2009 9:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The pitch count thing is more about practice. I think you’re wrong if you think he doesn’t like to kick back and hand it off. I don’t really think he’s audibling a bunch of plays and of those, some are to run from pass so its Darryl and Chilly who have him throwing 51 times.

by Salty on Nov 3, 2009 9:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

pitch count is for practices, not games

but your general point is taken. I’m hoping the next few weeks gives him opportunities to rest and conserve strength, maybe even just play a half of football and/or we run a lot more, expecially late in game.

by puddnhead on Nov 3, 2009 10:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

True,

I probably used that in the wrong manner. But when he signed on, it was understood that it was AP’s team and Favre would just open the game up a bit to soften up the run defense and pull that 8th man out of the box.

by Bjorno on Nov 4, 2009 10:37 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

IMO the whole idea of it being some player's team is kind of whacky

As to the playcalling? You play to win the game!

/HermEdward’d

by Salty on Nov 4, 2009 11:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Heh, True.

But I still think we are passing too much and running too little. That’s 51 passing attempts and 20 something rushes. Too heavy to the passing side, even if it was against the Steelers.

by Bjorno on Nov 4, 2009 12:00 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

51 is too much IMO as well

I wonder if there’ll be a nice cold, sloppy game where Adrian and Chester can take turns and just grind one out.

by Salty on Nov 4, 2009 1:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

AP's Team?

That’s a fallacy, always was. The day that it can be the RB’s team is the day you have no QB. That’s certainly not the case now.

I do agree that the running game should dominate, with Favre throwing less and conserving his strength for the end of the season (some time in February).

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 4, 2009 12:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

but there’s part of me that’s glad that the miles on Adrian’s odometer are being kept low for the late season and playoffs.

by Salty on Nov 4, 2009 1:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

There is a large part of me that is on the same page.

But I would like to see a more balanced attack.

by Bjorno on Nov 4, 2009 11:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I would like to see the Vikings offense counter-adjust for defenses so that AP will return to ripping monstrous amounts of yardage on a regular basis.

But so far it isn’t happening, there doesn’t seem to be any adjustment for the running game.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 6, 2009 7:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Taken literally, yes it is a fallacy.

We are certainly going to need Favre the most at the end of the year. The same goes for Peterson, but at ~20 touches a game he should not wear down enough to be a problem.

But I can see Favre wearing down as the season progresses, I would just like to keep him on ice a little more than we do.

by Bjorno on Nov 4, 2009 11:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

ironically they are sort of keeping him "on ice"

Somewhere I remember hearing about him using the “cold tub” after games for the first time. I wonder how cold that thing is. That does not sound like fun.

(But I know what you mean)

by Salty on Nov 5, 2009 8:20 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Completely agree

If we could rack up our 30 points faster, we could pull Favre out and let T-Jack or Rosey take over the game and give the old man a break.

Or if our D was doing their job, we could do that and not worry so much, but they’re struggling too much in the 2nd half for that to be a comfortable strategy

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 5, 2009 9:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I am on record...

on this site as a Favre supporter from the ‘get go’… but I too harbor worries about him making the entire season.
I’ve listened to the arguments that he’s old, injured, fades in the stretch, and throws more interceptions late/cold…

As a 40-something… I am in awe of the fact that he is still playing the game at such a high level – truly awesome.
Brett is on record (with Terry Bradshaw) talking about how it takes so much longer to recover from a game.
So yeah… I worry about him staying healthy and robust for the ‘late run to a really big game’.

I’ve also heard Brett talking about his primary motivation to play this year (and it’s not ‘purely’ Revenge, sorry R4F) and I’ve heard him state his singular goal ~ (yes, I know every player in the NFL says his goal is to win the Superbowl) ~ but when I hear Brett say it… I dunno… there’s something in his voice/eyes, that makes me BELIEVE

I pulled out last year’s schedule and the remaining Vikes schedule and the differences are HUGE – Brett’s bye came in week 5 last year – almost a whole month earlier than this year… 6 of his 9 (November and later) games were outdoors in (what I consider) cold weather stadiums. 2 of the remaining games were ‘warm weather’ outdoor and 1 dome game.
This year… his remaining 8 games… 5 are at Home, 1 away Dome, 1 ‘warm weather’ outdoor game, and 1 game at a cold Soldier field…
If cold home and cold away games were a contributor to Brett’s second half collapse last year and previous ‘late fades’ with GB, then you have to be excited about his late regular season schedule with the Vikings!

I think Brett is with a quality team that has all of the pieces in place… he is a proven leader who instills confidence in his teammates and lifts the level of play among those around him. I think Brett is HAPPY and is playing with a clean mind and a strong body.

I will still worry about the second half of the season, but like Brett’s teammates, I have a ‘new confidence’ in the 2009 Minnesota Vikings. I am also pragmatic enough NOT to have 1998-like ‘pre-hopes’… I just want to see this team go out every Sunday and play up to their potential… and I pray that they are keeping something ‘In the Tank’ for a late run at the ultimate prize.

I BELIEVE...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Nov 3, 2009 8:50 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Again, TMI...

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 4, 2009 12:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The Bye week I think plays in our favor this year and I still believe strongly, if the game is pretty much out of reach at the start of the 4th, start rotating in T.J. and Sage and let them get a little work with the 1st team.

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Nov 3, 2009 9:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know...

…the way we’ve been letting teams back into the game, we may need Favre more than you think in some of those games (i.e. Green Bay I, Baltimore, Green Bay II, etc.)

by mjmrad on Nov 4, 2009 12:00 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

True

But those were not blow outs going into the 4th either. Detroit, they did what I had hoped they would, took out Favre. At this point, the second half of the season looks like there will be more opportunities to possibly do this. The ones I can really see him having to be in there the whole game would be Giants, Cardinals and the Bengals. Im not saying Chicago and a few others will be fluff games, but I really dont see them improving much in the second half.

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Nov 4, 2009 8:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

you will only see tjoke

We are trying to trade him. hopfully there is a team need him enough to give a 2nd rounder

by vikefansd on Nov 4, 2009 2:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I was against the signing after the Training Camp deadline passed

but I am definitely enjoying this ride! How could I not?!

I am still not sure how it will end— even this season could finish with TJack or Sage playing mediocre in a playoff game, and the ride coming to a disappointing end. And the off-season full of angst again.

But, I am going to not think about that— and just live in the “now”… everything is pretty electric right now…

Had we not pursued Favre after the “deadline” passed, I would have supported that decision.

by Sonic on Nov 3, 2009 11:19 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Training camp

I cynically thought that that was another ploy to create an excuse for Chilly. (“Yeah, we signed a 1st ballot HoFer, but he didn’t have the benefit of a full training camp so I should keep my job anyway.”) Now I think that our playcalling isn’t getting better so much as Favre is audibling out of running to the left guard a 3rd time in a row.

by KC Viking on Nov 4, 2009 3:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

One thing still bothers me

I don’t like knowing that IF we do win the Super Bowl, Brett Favre will get all the credit. AP, Rice, Harvin, and the rest will all say the right things, but we have a **** good football TEAM this year.

by mjmrad on Nov 3, 2009 11:59 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

No matter what anyone says now… 5 years from now there’s only 1 thing that will be stated; the TEAM that won the game. The W/L record. That’s it. Don’t worry about the fanboi’s breathless cooing, it’ll go away :)

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 4, 2009 12:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I doubt that happens

And he will be the 1st to shut that talk down and pour the respect out for his teammates. Always does. Would you feel different if someone other than Favre had come in, had a phenominal year, maybe was awarded league and SB MVP – and got ‘all’ the credit? As with everything else concerning BF in the past 19 years, we can’t control the media.

by jshep on Nov 4, 2009 12:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You were not even making a SB with TJ or Sage

If you thought so, you needed a reality check.

by Drullin'OverDaCards on Nov 4, 2009 3:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Shoulda, Woulda, Coulda

The argument about what could happen with Favre’s age and injuries are crap…it happened last year, doesnt mean it will happen this year. Sports “experts” have been using that excuse ever scince Favre signed with the Vikes. The dude could also drop trou and take a dump on the Mall Of America Field at The Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome, doesnt mean he will…i mean he might, but i doubt it. So far this season he is playing like a canadate for the leauges MVP award, and even if he starts to slow down…we still have the best back in football today in ADAP to save us from a potential Favre meltdown. Favre signing looking like the best pickup this offseason for any team, and if he wanted to come back next year…i say welcome him with open arms even if its after training camp…hell lets set up a rocking chair with an umbrella drink next to a pool in mankato so he can just chill while training camp is goin on.

by Loki on Nov 4, 2009 4:20 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Loving it now

I was fairly vocal about supporting the decision, but only if he was in camp on day one. I still think that would have been optimal, but I’ve relaxed my requirements a bit. I was also concerned about his ability to control the urge to fire the ball around wrecklessly, obviously leading to those INTs. I can’t believe how well he’s done with that thus far. Just keep it coming!

by nlemke on Nov 4, 2009 7:50 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I was against it

because I was afraid Favre couldn’t play within our system and try to do too much like we’ve seen from him in the past. He really is playing within himself and our system and for that I’m happy. SKOL!!!!

by KC612 on Nov 4, 2009 8:11 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

A Changed Man

Milcard,
As I have said before I was against bringing Farve in for several reasons.
1) He is old and had faded the last two seasons
2) It would destroy team chemistry since two QB’s were fighting with the team
3) There would not be enough time to Jell with this team.
4) He is not the future of the team and we need a fiture.

Obviously I have eaten crow and am happy to do so. Coach knew more about Farve than I did. He takes a good team and takes them farther than any other available QB could take them.
If he can last two years we have time to build the future QB situation.
This team was ready to win but needs a great QB to properly run the system.

Happy to have him and hope he can take us to the promised land once again.

by lifelongvike on Nov 4, 2009 11:56 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Protection and great receiving

have given him more time to make better choices. ANY qb makes wrong decisions and throws ill advised passes when either under pressure and/ or receivers don’t find ways to be even slightly open. ANY OF THEM. Tip of the hat to both crews for excellent work. Perfect fit for BF.

Great ideas there, Loki!

by jshep on Nov 4, 2009 12:07 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

OK, I'll be the one to say it.

I did not want Favre on the Viking team, because he was my longtime hated rival’s QB and I despised him. That was then.

This is now. I would still much rather have TJ or Sage as the starting quarterback if they could be successful. Unfortunately, I do not think they can play as well as Farve is now.

I saw him as a self-centered egomaniac who was “all for me and me for all”. That was then.

This is now. I still believe that Favre had this personality when he played for the Packers. But I’m beginning to see why. Green Bay fans themselves are egomaniacs when it comes to their football team. I knew this all along, but it has really come out after their treatment of Favre.

I did not like the fact that he hurt his teams by playing injured just to maintain his starting streak. That was then.

This is now. There is absolutely no question in my mind that he hurt his teams while playing injured, however there may have been times, especially in NY, that he was pressured to do so.

I did not like the fact that he thought he was bigger than the team. Maybe he didn’t create this image all by himself, the press helped (i.e. John “only Favre can make that throw” Madden).

I especially couldn’t stomach the idea of my team, that I had been faithful to from their beginning, could actually want the Packer “God” on their team. That was then.

This is now. I have warmed to Favre. Winning will do that. But I will still not buy a Favre jersey.

The signing of Favre will only be measured a success if the Vikings win the Super Bowl. That was then.

This is now. While I still believe this, I also believe that he has brought some developement and success to the receiving corp that I don’t think they would have had otherwise.

That all being said, I will always cheer for my team to win. I will cheer for Favre to be successful. I will continue to hate the Packers and mock their fans. One thing that has really given me pleasure from the signing of Favre and his success so far as a Viking, is to see the Packer fans squirming. Oh happy times.

"Skol pa fiskande"

by NobleSavage on Nov 4, 2009 1:14 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

That’s not squirming, that’s a full blown tantrum.

by Salty on Nov 4, 2009 1:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I hate Favre too

But my love for the Vikes is more. It not that i hate him. but he breaks my heart so many time. I respect him. In the end. My love for the vikings win out.SKOL!!!!!!!!!!!!.

ps could anybody tel me what is SKOL

by vikefansd on Nov 4, 2009 2:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

As to the meaning of "SKOL"

Back in the Middle Ages, rampaging bands of Vikings were roaming Europe and kicking the shit out of people. At the end of the battle, they would decapitate the king or leader of the tribe/army they had just vanquished and that night would drink from his skull—spelled skoll—as a sign of respect for the fallen opponent. It was only then, Viking warriors believed, could an opponent who had fought valiantly be allowed into Valhalla.

In battle, Vikings would urge each other forward by yelling “SKOLL” to one another. By doing so, they were telling each other to keep it up so they could drink from the skull of the Vanquished that night.

These days, it just is a way to urge each other on to victory in an American football game, but if you piss us off too much, we’ll put Mike McCarthy’s head on a pole, parade it around, and then drink some Leinenkugel’s from it, so keep one eye open bitches, because the Vikings can go medieval on you in a freakin’ heartbeat.

"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."

--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre

by MilCardFan on Nov 4, 2009 3:09 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah!

I like that definition!

"Skol pa fiskande"

by NobleSavage on Nov 4, 2009 3:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So my question is, who dropped the second “L”?

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Nov 4, 2009 4:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i only want to piss off packers

or is it piss on packers. but thank for the info on skol

by vikefansd on Nov 5, 2009 12:43 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

From the Wiki folks
Skol (written skĂ¥l in Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish, and sometimes “Skoal” in English) is the Danish/Norwegian/Swedish word for a salute or a toast, as to an admired person or group. The meaning of the Scandinavian skalli/skalle: skal means simply “shell” and skĂ¡l/skĂ¥l “bowl”. There is a popular misconception that the toast comes from the mythical habit of Vikings to drink from cups made from the skulls of their defeated enemies.

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?" -Joe Kapp

by less cowbell, more 'neau on Nov 4, 2009 7:58 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ah

Thanks for the info. I knew it was regarding a salute or something like that, just was never sure on the origins, tho knew it was related to the Vikings legend when they ruled Europe.

"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"

by VikesFaninNM on Nov 4, 2009 9:01 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Soo.... what did it come from, if not the skull-drink thingy?

Because if they don’t have an answer for that, the ol’ myth still stands :)

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Nov 5, 2009 9:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Read it again
skal means simply "shell" and skĂ¡l/skĂ¥l "bowl".

It’s basically saying “Salute” or “Cheers.”
But yes, the myth is cooler.

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?" -Joe Kapp

by less cowbell, more 'neau on Nov 5, 2009 1:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no no no

I like the skull much better I am staying with that! In 1000 years everyone will know it as skulls Due to this Year! (LOL)

it is better to be thought of as dumb then to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Ben Franklin

by montana vikes fan on Nov 5, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Feel you man that was me as well

Completely against, but now like a itchy mold that smells really nice, he’s grown on me.

by Grime on Nov 4, 2009 4:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh and pissing the Packers off is completely worth it

God even if he can’t play anymore after last week I think we should retire his number the next day. Not because he was great for us, but because it might actually cause a war. :D

by Grime on Nov 4, 2009 4:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Could be interesting....

I think we may do it if we win the SB….LOL

Deservedly so as well…..along with a few more in the future from this current team…

Also could be yet another “record” for Brett….What ELSE could we add….hmmmmm

Maybe a party at the end of the season with a “SKOL” or two from our opponents….

I would rather be IN the Arena than watching from the stands...That is my life!
* Read Teddy Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" if you need further explanation...

by vikingfanfrom afar on Nov 4, 2009 6:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"Pissing the Packers off"

Even if we don’t get to the playoffs, winning those two games was worth it to me.

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?" -Joe Kapp

by less cowbell, more 'neau on Nov 4, 2009 8:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t want a guy I rooted against for 16 years wearing purple, but I got over it by the time pre-season was over and the real season began. He puts on purple and he’s a Viking, that’s enough for me, I don’t have to love the guy but he’s doing an excellent job and as a bonus not acting like a d-bag.

by zebano on Nov 4, 2009 1:19 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Cheers

in Scandinavian….I think.

by KC612 on Nov 4, 2009 3:04 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

It is

today anyway. My father always taosted with, “Skal pa fikande”. Cheers to fishing. A Swedish fishermen toast wishing them all good luck.

"Skol pa fiskande"

by NobleSavage on Nov 4, 2009 3:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I was against it. Whole-heartily.

But I have gone thru the 5 steps of grieving. (Yes, I grieved when that slap nuts ex-Packer came here) I am now on the 5th step of the process. Acceptance.

I have to admit he has been fun to watch and that he gives us the best chance in years to win it all. If that happens, I will become a Favre fan and rescind the slap nuts comment from earlier in this post.

In the interest of full disclosure, I do have Favre on my fantasy team. He has had great value when compared to what I paid for him in our auction. One might say that I am a little schizo when the subject is Favre. I can accept that. And so can I.

by Odin on Nov 5, 2009 12:32 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I just went back and read my 7/28 fanpost & replies

(I was the one that first posted here that Favre told Childress no)

If anyone doesn’t remember or was in doubt of what I felt, well I was openly bemoaning that I thought Favre saying no would probably end up meaning another moderately successful season, playoffs but no bye, & maybe a mid-round exit from playoffs. Although there were actually a few that agreed with me, a few more that did not disagree or agree but asked me to stop being so negative, it was time to move on … there were a number of folks who expressed relief that Favre (appeared at the time he) wasn’t coming. I see a few posting here today, some having changed their minds, but a lot of them actually have not chimed in (e.g. Viking83, one of the more vocal antiFavre guys)

by puddnhead on Nov 5, 2009 8:26 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Viking83, one of the more vocal antiFavre guys

I’d certainly expect the former Packers fan to call me out.

As for my “chiming”… see NobleSavage’s post above. I’d write my own, but it would pretty much be word for word what he said.

If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal

by TheViking83 on Nov 6, 2009 2:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A former Packer fan?

Really….now I get it.

"Skol pa fiskande"

by NobleSavage on Nov 6, 2009 2:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i'm still here

and i’m still against it. i mostly just turn the sound off while i watch the games so i don’t have to hear all the gushing.

my reservations over favre were never about the first 8 weeks so keep hanging in there and hope he hangs on. i hope he does but i don’t believe he will.

haven’t been posting much lately. work has picked up and i’m a newly single dad! yay me! so time is at a premium.

believe me, i won’t run and hide. we haven’t hit the annual favre slide time yet but it’s coming. luckily, unless chicago and nyg turn things around, our second half schedule looks a lot easier than it did at the beginning of the season.

no way we keep up with new orleans in the playoffs. not with favre.

by iseepurplepeople on Nov 6, 2009 4:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I want to know

Why does SI.com still have pictures of Favre on the Viking team page in a Packer jersey??? I think he’s been in the Twin Cities long enough that the media department must have picture of him in purple. Maybe Don Banks is hoping this is a silly dream and will wake up to Brett as the starting QB in Green Bay.

by boomy44 on Nov 6, 2009 10:31 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I want to know what happened to Farva....

I miss his wit and charm on this humble little blog…

I piss people off on a fairly regular basis. I cherish my right to speak my mind, whether I sound like an uneducated savage or not. I've never been accused of keeping what I think a secret, nor will I ever. Don't like it? I don't care.

by IABerserker1 on Nov 6, 2009 10:31 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!
Start posting about the Vikings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Viking_flag_small
Why Brett Favre should Decide by April 20
Avatar_small
Saints fans heckled Favre while injured
Favre_small
all you fair weather fans can go fist yourself
Viking_flag_small
Bobby McCray Nominated for Cheap Shot Artist of the Week

Recent FanPosts

Tommy-kramer-_small
2011- The year of the NFL Lockout- No Football or Scab Football
Small
Brett Favre = Y.A. Tittle Redux
Avatar_small
Former Vikings in the Super Bowl
Small
No one yells at manning
Small
Superbowl 44 - Who will win it?
Percy-harvin_small
Year in Memory
Images_small
Should/Could/Would the Vikings Trade Bryant McKinnie?
Avatar_small
John Randle will enter the Hall of Fame
Percy_small
Anyone interested in Favre Pro Bowl Jersey

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Arrowhead Pride
Scouts Inc. On the Chiefs Draft Needs
Arrowhead Pride
Chiefs Give Missouri Teachers A Discount On Season Tickets
Mile High Report
Super Bowl, Cowherds, & a HOF Limerick

Head Coach

Dailynorseman_small Gonzo

Coordinators

Dodge_front_small MilCardFan

Victory__small ericj69

Childress_small Anthony21