Five Good Questions with Cincy Jungle
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the moment you've all been waiting for. . .the return of Five Good Questions! (We had actually set something like this up with the folks at Revenge of the Birds this past weekend, but real life kept interfering and prevented it from taking place.) However, this week I got to exchange some questions with Josh Kirkendall, the head man over at SBNation's Cincinnati Bengals' blog, Cincy Jungle. I know there's already an "Ask a Norseman" FanPost over there, courtesy of Grime (thank you very much), but I had a chance to exchange a few questions with CJ as well.
So, here are the questions I sent Josh's way. . .and the questions that Josh sent me for answering are now available right here. And away we go!
1) The Bengals have been one of the NFL’s surprise teams this season. Going into the season, did you think that the team had this sort of potential, and what part of the team has been the biggest surprise to you?
This is always a tough question, not because I don’t know the answer; rather there are so many variables that combined into making this team the most improved through 12 games in NFL history. But the biggest surprise has been the Bengals offensive line. Bobbie Williams was the only returning starting lineman that played the same position he played in 2008. Two starters were undrafted free agents a few years back and were molded while on the team’s practice squad. A third undrafted free agent, Dennis Roland, rotates with Anthony Collins and Andre Smith at right tackle as well as plays tight end during jumbo formations where the Bengals sometimes have four offensive tackles on the line
With so many changes, you wouldn’t expect the Bengals to have a rushing offense with three running backs who have combined for seven 100-yard rushing games and in the top-ten for least amount of quarterback sacks allowed. Bar far, the improved offensive line has gone a long way to from taking a last ranked offense in 2008 to one of consistency and stability in 2009.
2) You can’t talk about the Bengals without talking about Chad Ochocinco, who has already declared that when (not if) he scores this week, he’s going to get the Vikings’ mascot involved in the celebration. As a Bengal fan, what do you think of Eight Five’s antics and how does the fan base at large feel about them?
Bengals fans have a give and take relationship with Chad. Most of us just laugh and move on. Nothing he’s done this year has negatively impacted the Bengals and most players in this league realize that Chad is a jokester. As a fan, I stopped taking his antics seriously long ago and found myself enjoying them more than anything; he’s a far better player when he’s having fun and honestly, if he scores touchdowns, I don’t care what he does. Yea, it would be nice if he confirmed to the old school frame of mind. But that’s not the reality. So you take what you can and when he scores touchdowns, you just let his other antics be. Compared to other players whose antics involve the law, Chad’s are trivial at best.
3) Ever since blowing out the Bears and going on their bye week, the Bengal offense has appeared to be a bit out of sorts. What do you chalk this up to, and what do you think they’ll try to do against the Vikings to get the offense back on the right track?
Offensively, they’ve moved the football. Cincinnati’s offense has recorded 300 yards or more of offense in five of their past six games. But obviously, yardage isn’t translating to points. The red zone production is clearly down. Since scoring six touchdowns in seven red zone appearances against the Bears, the Bengals have scored five touchdowns in 16 red zone appearances in the five games since.
I think a lot of that has to do with broken pass protection schemes. I said earlier the unit that’s surprised me the most is the Bengals offensive line. However, they’ve struggled as of late giving Palmer a padded pocket. As a result, Palmer is being hit as, or after, he throws the football, often causing him to rush his throws or to just leave the pocket altogether.
Cincinnati is moving the football just fine, but we haven’t finished drives. And they could be looking to do that this weekend against the Vikings. Against a defense strong against the rush, the Bengals could gameplan an offense that stretches the field. However, we thought that against the Lions, Browns and Raiders and Palmer is still on a streak of not throwing for 300 yards or more in 16 straight games.
4) Who is a member of the Bengals that most Viking fans probably haven’t heard of that will have an impact on the outcome of this Sunday’s game?
Jonathan Fanene. He’s a defensive end that rotates some as a defensive tackle during third-and-long situations. He’s the guy that replaced Antwan Odom earlier in the year as one of the primary pass rushers. He only has five sacks, but one hell of a motor. Last week, rookie Michael Johnson tipped a Matthew Stafford pass at the line of scrimmage that fell into Fanene’s hands, scoring a touchdown. I would also keep your eye on rookie punter Kevin Huber. He can turn the field position game with just one kick from nearly anywhere on the field.
5) What are the keys for the Bengals this Sunday, and how do you see this game playing out?
It would seem to me that both teams have a point to make Sunday. After 12 games, the Bengals have only beaten one team that a winning record at this point (the Packers). Cincinnati needs to see how they stack up against one of the best teams in the NFL. The Vikings, it would seem to me, are in a similar boat, after losing by 13 to the Cardinals.
With both teams sporting a good rushing offense and a great rushing defense, this game is going to end with bloody noses. This is going to be a physical game, and that’s the way that Cincinnati needs it to go to beat the Vikings.
Thanks to Josh for taking the time to answer these questions. We'll have more as the day goes by, so stay tuned!
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
Well
As I was figuring back during our bye week, Arizona and Cincy were gonna be tough and I seriously could see us losing both games. Not that we are bad or anything, just both very good teams. With that said, hopefully we win this one and get back on track but it’s gonna be a close one. Just ticked they wont be airing it here, so I’ll be heading to the bar tomorrow morning.
"If you're gonna shoot, shoot, don't talk."
"You men are only risking your lives, while I am risking an almost-certain Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actor!"
"We have clearance Clarence. Roger Rodger, what's our vector Victor?"
Say what?
VikesFaninNM said “Just ticked they wont be airing it here, so I’ll be heading to the bar tomorrow morning.”
I don’t see the down side. :-P
lol
But cheaper to have the beer at home!
"If you're gonna shoot, shoot, don't talk."
"You men are only risking your lives, while I am risking an almost-certain Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actor!"
"We have clearance Clarence. Roger Rodger, what's our vector Victor?"
by VikesFaninNM on Dec 12, 2009 2:32 PM CST up reply actions
Some comsolation for you...
I will hopefully not be still working, and if not as usual will follow here on DN and NFL site until later in the week when I get a chance to see it….
Given the choice between heading to a sports bar as you must and what I likely will have here, bar would win hands down for me! Hope you can enjoy a little bit more knowing this lol!
Should be a good match…wherever/whenever we get to see it!
I do not see us losing this one and still think we win by 2 TDs…
BTW, heading to the bar in the morning….oooof may be a LONG day for you! Have fun!
SKOL and GO VIKES!
I would rather be IN the Arena than watching from the stands...That is my life!
* Read Teddy Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" if you need further explanation...
by vikingfanfrom afar on Dec 12, 2009 11:36 AM CST up reply actions
oops CONSOLATION
I will be here on DN site (not a bad thing) and “watching” graphics/info on NFL site….
Rather be in bar where you are going to be!
ENJOY and GO VIKINGS!
SKOL!!!
I would rather be IN the Arena than watching from the stands...That is my life!
* Read Teddy Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" if you need further explanation...
by vikingfanfrom afar on Dec 12, 2009 11:38 AM CST up reply actions
you could see us losing this game?
Well all I know that is if both teams play to or close to their potential, the Vikings will win comfortably.
One thing I've noticed this season with the Bengals
Don’t under estimate them.
Everyone wants to talk about how us and the Bengals have only beaten one team with a winning record.
Well, as of the entire season, yeah. But the Steelers weren’t in bad shape when the Bengals beat them twice and we lost. The Ravens had a winning record when we beat them and Cincy twice and so one. They lost to Denver on a fluke play. So yeah, they have the potential to beat us.
I still see us winning, but it wont be “comfortably”
"If you're gonna shoot, shoot, don't talk."
"You men are only risking your lives, while I am risking an almost-certain Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actor!"
"We have clearance Clarence. Roger Rodger, what's our vector Victor?"
by VikesFaninNM on Dec 12, 2009 3:02 PM CST up reply actions
The Bengals are a solid team...
And I’m not under estimating them. I think they will lose because I know what we can do if we play good ball. Plus we have better players than they do, in my opinion.
Jasper Brinkley...
He might be really good. He hits hard and has a nose for the ball. It might not be the big drop off from EJ that everyone is thinking.
If the Viking O-line blocks as poorly as it did last week the Vikes are doomed. They will be better (I hope).
Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!

by 

















