...and new coaches from a different tree.
This was the 2nd game out of the last 3 that the Vikings lost badly to teams who were in the playoffs last year.
What do the Minnesota Vikings need? I don't know the entire answer, but it probably ends with something like this:
...
5 golden linemen
4 defensive backs
3 field goals
2 quarterbacks
...and new coaches from a different tree.
But in all seriousness, when will this organization wake up and realize that their guys in the secondary can't cover anybody? Does it get worse than Matt Moore torching the team to the tune of a 120+ rating with 3 TDs and 0 INTs (his INT% had been unbelievably high in his career before last night's game).
I know there are lots of Chilly lovers and Chilly apologists out there, but further denial about the state of the secondary will become a firable offense, and the inability to game plan against Matt Moore is already a big strike against him. He couldn't take Favre out of the game after he had decided to do it, so who IS coaching this team?
Brad Childress is probably better as a stewardess than as a Santa because he gave Vikings fans a lump of coal for the week of Christmas. Thankfully, there could be a win in January instead, but given how few games the Panthers had won this year and how little @ss The Great Matt Moore had kicked in his career until he met Childress's, Frazier's and Bevell's Vikings, I will mail in my interest in the team until the playoffs. I can't say for certain whether the coaches are doing all-time worst jobs or if the players are apparently mailing in the end of the season, but nothing points to a competent coaching staff. Most of their wins should have happened based on the crappiness of the competition with any somewhat competent coaching staff. I can't really think of one great win which was won by a wiley move by the coaching staff, and I'd love to be wrong about that.
This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.
0 recs |
42 comments
|
Comments
Heh.
Well… this loss should help us to remember that life is about more than football – especially at this time of year.
‘My’ team got beat.
But I still have my health, my family, my job, and my dog.
Now… all I want for Christmas is for ‘my’ team to get their running game back.
GO VIKES!!
Merry CHRISTmas, everyone!
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Dec 21, 2009 6:44 PM CST reply actions
To hell with that!
Health, family all extras!!! All they do is distract you from the gam on Sunday!!! C’mon man!!!
true...
except that you don’t have to get your own beer with a family on hand.
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Dec 22, 2009 1:39 PM CST up reply actions
And you can't leave Cookies and Beer on the mantle for Santa
without a family.
C’mon Grime! Deep down Your a better Viking than a Grinch
Merry Christmas
by lifelongvike on Dec 22, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions
Ok now your just insulting Grinches
You can be an excellent Grinch and still be a great Vikings fan.
And hey I leave White Russians and Condoms out for Santa.
wth...
is on your xmas list?
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Dec 23, 2009 12:30 AM CST up reply actions
I would tell you,
but it involves a lot of things that I believe would get me banned.
One of them however (Just under Jessica Alba) is a Lombardi trophy sitting in Minnesota…
Wierd I thought I was being thoughtful and non profane
I’ll have to work on that.
Eugh. Are you blaming the defense on Childress? Sorry, man, that’s Frazier for you. Childress leaves the defense alone, leaves it up solely to his DC pretty much. So if you’ve got beef with the DBs, blame Frazier. The defense has lost some of its teeth this season, giving up all these 4th quarter points.
I mentioned Frazier several times
The difference between Tomlin’s D and Frazier’s has been once effective (5th lowest rating allowed in 2006) vs. very ineffective vs. the pass (10th worst in 2007, middle of the pack in 2008, and 7th worst in 2009). Childress definitely had a lot to do with Frazier getting the job and keeping it without much improvement despite spending a lot of money on Madieu WIlliams and high draft picks on Chad Greenway and Cedric Griffin (before his arrival), Jared Allen, and Tyrell Johnson.
Maybe the Tampa-2 has been used so often that everyone has figured out how to beat it, or at least the version the Vikings have been using. Both Childress and Frazier are very married to their systems, often choosing lesser talents just so that they won’t have to learn as much about a new system (which would still involve making reads, taking good angles, getting there ASAP and tackling, but who cares about those kinds of skills when there are plenty of slow learners who already have experience with the Childress/Frazier Systems?) and doing dumb things like dropping Pat Williams into coverage because someone else running this system had that play for a more mobile DT.
I know it is impossible, but...
I voted other, hoping rules change and we can draft a new coach…..LOL
The Chiefs did it!
“King” Carl Peterson traded a 1st round pick for Dick Vermeil! It almost would have been worth it had DV stuck around for 2 or more years.
Voted other
I think finding Pat Williams’ replacement is very important and if there is one available in the 1st I say get him, but if not LT most definitely; McKinnie is not worth the pick we drafted him with (7th overall) or the money we are paying him: $49 mil over seven years.
I think that you are right about Pat
Finding a replacement for Pat Williams should be a focus in the next 2 drafts (assuming that he plays another year, and I think that he will).
McKinnie has been great for the Vikings until part of this year. I don’t know if he’s been banged up or is showing some age and wear and tear or if it’s a matter of concentration. I agree with others who have written that McKinnie was beaten by a speed rusher this week and holds his own very well vs. bull rushers. There simply aren’t many speed rushers in the NFL right now, so that is one area I don’t expect to be a problem in the remaining games that the Vikes will play this season. That said, I’d be happy with an OT who could play multiple positions.
Wow
To say that nothing about this 11 and 3 team points to a competent coaching staff is unfair.
To say that lately our coaches have struggled to fix protection problems in two of the last three games is fair, as is to say our D line hasn’t played up to billing in two of the last three games. Trouble at the line of scrimmage = bad QB/secondary play = losing = fire the coach according to many?
I guess I’m a Childress apologist for thinking like I do?
by drew10 on Dec 22, 2009 5:03 AM CST via mobile reply actions
Nah.
My point was that this Vikings team still struggles to beat last year’s playoff teams, and all of the complaints which led to the fire Childress movement are still true today plus a few unpleasant surprises. Sure, they have won a bunch of cupcake games that just about any coach could have won with this level of talent and payroll, but losing to ARI and CAR did not inspire confidence that this team is a real threat in the playoffs.
Things this coaching staff hasn’t figured out:
- how to get 4.0 ypc out of Adrian Peterson
- how to protect Favre
- how to stop sucky backup QBs from having great games
- how to create more turnovers (currently 24th)
- how to get quality play from a secondary of hand-picked guys who already knew the system
The first 2 could have included keeping Matt Birk. We miss him now. The last 3 could have been addressed by keeping Darren Sharper and drafting talented players rather than less talented guys who supposedly would need less coaching. In my mind, great coaches don’t draft guys who already know the system so that the coaches don’t need to work so hard or explain so much; rather, they draft talented players and try to get the most out of them. Successfully achieving the latter will always prevail over successfully achieving the former. Darrelle Revis, for example, as more passes defended and INTs (36) than Cedric Griffin (7), Tyrell Johnson (7), Madieu Williams (4), Antoine Winfield (5), Bennie Sapp (4), Karl Paymah (2) and Asher Allen (2)…more
than the entire Viking secondary!One could also compare Cedric Griffin (42 PDs and INTs in 52 GS) vs. Richard Marshall (42 PDs and INTs in 28 GS).
Since you didn’t go on about how Childress is the next Belichick or deny reality to proclaim your love for him, you fall well short of being a true Childress apologist.
I don't see what your getting at.
ok I do. We’re not perfect sucks, but we still win when we play together.
Sounds to me like...
like your issues are more with our defensive scheme than Childress? Can you blame a team for drafting to fit their defense? It’s nice to have a shutdown corner but our scheme calls for players that strive with their eyes towards the quarterback and doesn’t put a premium on corners.
I also think the Cover 2 seems to have run it’s course unless you have a D line that’s tearing stuff apart like ours seems to do every time they don’t play on Sunday night, but we’re not switching to a 3-4 at the earliest until Jared is gone and we don’t do enough fire zone because do we really want Jared, Kevin and Pat dropping into coverage too often? I don’t.
The problem with this team is that our o-line is vastly overrated, but I don’t think Matt Birk would be that much of an improvement over Sullivan this season… I remember multiple times last year when we would all be bitching about Birk way more than people are bitching about Sullivan this year. I’m hoping Hutch’s back is just a one year thing but backs usually linger for life, right? All that I know is that if for some reason this team is to make a superbowl and we had to play Indianapolis— Freeney and Mathis would have their way with our tackles.
I’m only 24. I haven’t been through near the amount of pain as some of our older Vikings fans who have seen multiple superbowls go down the toilet, and maybe if I had I would have the same depressing attitude that many have flooded this site with after our last two losses. But the amount of bitching about this 11-3 team that still is in the driver’s seat for a first round bye is ridiculous.
Also...
Do you have a link to someone saying Childress is the next Bellichick?
And for the record— I feel like a Childress apologist because I would guess that ~1/3 of my posts here are defending him (or continuity in general) against overly emotional fans who hate him mostly because Tarvaris Jackson isn’t the next Donnovan McNabb.
I woudl expect TJ to be the next Peyton Manning thank you
McNabb not good enough. :D
Look up past posts about Childress and there will usually be at least 1 Childress apologist who insists that 2-3 years wouldn’t have been long enough for Belichick (and/or several other HoF coaches), just wait ’til he goes somewhere else, blah, blah, blah.
Childress said that he thought he’d drafted the next Donovan McNabb in 2006. That was back when developing QBs was his supposed strength. It had never really produced great examples aside from Donovan McNabb, who was also a very high pick and a premium talent by all measures. Childress probably had very little to do with McNabb’s success aside from the fact that his predictable offense with the likes of Todd Pinkston didn’t give McNabb much to work with.
Whew- Pretty rough out there
I have suffered like many of you through our 4 superbowl losses and the devastating 1998 almost flawless season. Each year we have losses. In fact except for TWO years in modern history every team in the NFL have had losses. The difference between winning and losing is very small. One injury, one fight with the wife, one bad stock investment can send a player off of the top of his game. The coaching job is two fold.
1) Draft players that will run your system well, and
2) Devise a system that works and is adaptable week to week.
Since Chilly has been here (2006) the scouting and drafting department have done a remarkable job of drafting players and free agents. No more 2005 draft days where all of your top picks are busts. Every draft pick from last year is on the roster. Special teams have improved because of this. The entire team has improved because of this.
The Vikes use the same system that has been used since Chilly got here. A predictable, yet effective, form of the West Coast offense. He has yet to have one QB start his offense for more than one year. This is remarkable.
The Vikes use a Tampa Cover 2 defensive style. They rely on dominate pass rush from the linemen to harass the QB and zone coverage from the secondary to stop errant passes. To play any other style of defense requires faster players in the secondary that can absolutely cover Man on Man. The Vikes don’t have those kind of players yet.
The failure of the Vikings this year has been the offensive lines inability to open run lanes. For whatever reasons ( injuries, speeding tickets, crying babies) they were terrible Sunday night. This means no time of possession on offense, a tired defense, and a sacked QB.
Of course our team looks like a playoff non-contender this week. It happens. The Superbowl champs lost 5 in a row. New Orleans lost. Denver lost to Oakland. Lets understand that a game isn’t the end of the football world. We control our own destiny. Beat Chicago and the Giants and we play in a dome the whole way.
Its not Chilly. Its a 52 man Team that executes or not. Lets find support for this club from the top on down.
SKOAL
by lifelongvike on Dec 22, 2009 6:50 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
I'm not sure I like your attitude bub.
That post makes way to much sense and isn’t blaming anyone.. I’m pretty sure you need to be banned.
Ho Ho Ho
Merry Christmas
We are the NFC North Champions
We have the 2nd best record in the NFL
Merry Christmas
by lifelongvike on Dec 22, 2009 8:00 AM CST up reply actions
Excellent post lifelongvike
The failure of the Vikings this year has been the offensive lines inability to open run lanes.
Couldn’t agree more. The OLines inability to open run lanes and/or protect Favre has been costly. Our offensive struggles put more pressure on the defense and in the case of the Carolina game, caused it to collapse in the fourth quarter after playing fairly solid for three quarters.
by EasternVike on Dec 22, 2009 10:13 AM CST up reply actions
SKOL
Special teams have improved
They had to improve from being one of the worst ST units ever under Chilly’s buddy, Ferraro.
The Vikes use the same system that has been used since Chilly got here. A predictable, yet effective, form of the West Coast offense. He has yet to have one QB start his offense for more than one year. This is remarkable.
For the first 3 years, it was a lot more predictable than effecive. This year, the offense is effective because 1) Chilly finally caved on his assertion that WRs should never be drafted in the 1st round; 2) Brett Favre has taken over some of the playcalling, both on the sideline chats with Chilly and Bevell and at the LOS; 3) this is the first year that Chilly tried to get a QB because he was good rather than average and submissive; 4) Favre and a WR training camp seem to have transformed Sidney Rice, although not many QBs could be quite as accurate as Favre has been this year.
To play any other style of defense requires faster players in the secondary that can absolutely cover Man on Man. The Vikes don’t have those kind of players yet.
That’s correct — the Vikings have limited options because they believe in selecting limited players, but for some odd reason aren’t sure why they get such limited results. Doing so is also an admission that they can’t coach talented, skilled and truly good players.
This means no time of possession on offense, a tired defense, and a sacked QB.
Believe it or not, the Vikings rank 7th in ToP, so it can’t be that, which also means that the D is getting more rest on the sidelines than 25 other NFL teams including at least 5 playoff teams.
The failure of the Vikings this year has been the offensive lines inability to open run lanes. For whatever reasons ( injuries, speeding tickets, crying babies) they were terrible Sunday night.
According to NFL.com, the OL does well in run stats (tied for 7th in PWR) but is below average in sacks allowed.
Now that we know how much Cedric Griffin drinks before he drives home, I guess you would use that to excuse how often he gets beat deep.
In all walks of life, people deal with crying babies, traffic tickets (although more responsible people have fewer or no traffic tickets), relationships…and are expected to be on their games every day with that sort of pressure to perform affecting many more days per year. All you’ve said here is that the Vikes are a bunch of wusses, and that is EXACTLY how they played Sunday night. Maybe it means that Matt Birk and Darren Sharper were tougher than the wussies that have replaced them?
A whole lot of generalizations there.
When did Childress say he wouldn’t draft a WR in the first round? Are you generalizing the angers of the Philly fan base and their organization’s philosophy for many years to Brad? He takes the best player available with little consideration for the position they play.
“Doing so is also an admission that they can’t coach talented, skilled and truly good players.”
What? Do you want Childress coaching our DBs? Your beef here is with Frazier and company. You just hate the concept of a zone corner, right?
The time of possession is heavily skewed.. and anyone watching the games can see that our rushing issues are a combo of our o-line being overrated and Adrian showing very little patience.
Childress has said on a couple of occasions that WRs should not be drafted in the 1st round. He thought that signing Bobby Wade was the same as drafting a 1st round WR. You know, Bobby Wade, he who got lots of playing time in MIN under Childress but isn’t good enough to play for the lowly Chiefs.
Childress gets all the credit for draftees from the Childress apologists who post here, so he should get some of the blame, too. A perfect example is Richard Marshall (explained in another reply on this post). He was available when the Vikes drafted Griffin, also had experience as a cover-2 CB, but also had the ability to man up and cover well on an island. The Vikes chose the guy who could only play in their system without even the occasional surprise man-to-man D on a few downs, and it was a mistake. They gave him a contract extension for the same poor reasons. I absolutely hate the idea of a zone-only CB.
If the ToP is heavily skewed, it’s because the Vikings have been playing one of the easiest schedules I’ve seen since last year’s Vikings schedule. If anything, AP has been too patient while looking for the 2nd hole like Barry Sanders…and having some of the same problems.
maybe its all that annoying christmas spirit but...
… i STILL believe that if we secure #2, we will be in the SB… what?? did i just type that out loud??? … yes… on turf , the pass rush is fast enough to harass the qb and allow db’s to make plays on rushed passes.. on turf, our receivers can get separation, and our run game more precise cutting and hitting holes just a bit quicker..
with #2 seed, we are guaranteed dome games until the super bowl…
…i WONT say we’ll win ..as a matter of fact, probably lose handily..to either SD (my pick) or IND.. but hey, after 28yrs or so, i would even welcome a SB loss
"the following statement is true:
the preceding statement was false" - george carlin
The secondary played well against Pittsburgh
a passing offense. They had 500 passing yards against the Packers.
so then you are hereby proclaiming..
…that they’ll WIN the super bowl?! , right?? if so, i hope ur right, and not just eggnoging a bit early ;)
"the following statement is true:
the preceding statement was false" - george carlin
by BranFavrenton on Dec 22, 2009 8:53 AM CST up reply actions
They didn't exactly own that game
They played OK vs. PIT, who probably should have kept handing off to Mendenhall since he was gaining yards at a great rate. The secondary gave up a 40-yd TD to Mike Wallace and probably could have won it by making more plays on the ball (like Keyaron Fox’s INT return basically won it for them).
KC?
Two very unfortunate turnovers for touchdowns gave a little bit of a nudge for the Steelers don’t you think? The Vikes have played pretty well when things are going well and have played awful during the three games that they lost.
by lifelongvike on Dec 22, 2009 2:08 PM CST up reply actions
Yes
The well-coached Steelers were able to take care of Vikings’ mistakes, but not the other way around. The Vikings have played well when the other teams were below average or worse and lost to 3 teams who were good last year and struggled at times this year (almost all the time when not playing the Vikings in CAR’s case).
I'm sorry
What is this years record of the most effective coach the Vikings ever had? Oh yeah, here it is— 7-7
I really do understand your frustration with our coaching. Its not innovative, new, inspired, dynamic, or even pretty sometimes. But it has made the Vikings a better team. Sometimes we forget how bare the cupboard was in 2006. The draft choices of 2005 just didn’t cut it. An attitude problem existed throughout the team.
This coach has brought stability and a winning system back to Minnesota since 2006. When you look at the perennial SB contenders like Indy, NE, Eagles, ect you see long term coaching staffs that do the same thing that works each and every year. They just do them to perfection and use better athletes each year.
Hopefully that is the path were on. We’ll have a better idea after the Giants game.

by 
















