Cassel Accepts Patriots Franchise Tender
According to the folks at ESPN, Patriots' QB Matt Cassel has accepted the franchise tender that he has been presented by the New England Patriots. Certainly can't say that I blame the guy. . .acceptance of the tender means that he's guaranteed to make $14.65 million next season, something that nobody in their right mind (including Matt Cassel) probably could have imagined at this time a year ago.
So what does that mean for the Vikings and/or other teams that might be looking to trade for the former USC backup?
For starters, it means that Cassel can no longer shop himself to other teams. The Patriots can still deal him to another team, but Cassel can't hop a plane to Minnesota or Kansas City or something and say, "Hey, I'd like to play for you guys. Any chance you guys could try to work a trade for me?" His fate is now exclusively in the hands of the New England Patriots.
Secondly, any team that trades for Cassel had better have a ton of cap space available, because signing this franchise tender means that Cassel will get every penny of that $14.65 million next season. Not spread out over the next couple of years, but next season.
So, in terms of the hunt for a new quarterback, this off-season is not starting off particularly well for the Vikings. Depending on how highly the team thought of Cassell and Kurt Warner, we may already be looking at Plan C.
Speaking of which. . .NFL Mock Drafts are starting up already, and the folks here at The Daily Norseman were asked to participate in one over at Next Season Sports. I won't give away who we picked here. . .but I think that, given the scenario that's played out in said mock, we made the obvious choice.
Keep enjoying your Sunday, folks, and remember that the Pro Bowl is this evening. . .our last chance to see anything even remotely resembling real NFL football for another six months.
0 recs |
37 comments
|
Comments
Plan C?
I think it is like plan D or beyond by now and free agency hasn’t even started. Remember there was talk of Donovan McNabb (plan A or B), Warner (B or A), and Cassell was plan C.
It may take a village to raise a child, but it takes a Viking to raze a village.
by Luft Krigare on Feb 8, 2009 10:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Smart move by Cassel on two fronts
he’s guaranteed $14.65 million, and the Pats almost have to deal him. If they keep him, 30% of their cap space is taken up in Brady and Cassel, and that’s not realistic. Let’s assume Brady comes back healthy. Your backup is gathering dust at almost $15 mil, making as much as Brady and Moss combined? No way.
I never thought franchising Cassel was smart for the Pats, because this was their nightmare scenario, and now he’s got the team by the short curlies.
Thoughts on the Vikings, Buckeyes, and Cardinals
www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com
by MilCardFan on Feb 8, 2009 10:18 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I thought that if the Pats traded him, he would work out a deal with the new team. I had no idea the Franchise Tag terms had to be followed by the new team. If that’s the case, he’s a Patriot for sure next season, since I can’t imagine anyone would pay half that for a QB that is as inexperienced as Cassel. I do think he’s shown a lot in his only season as starter, but not THAT much!
Yeah, I would say we’re on option D at least.
by Bodysuit Man on Feb 8, 2009 12:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Every report I can find notes that the Patriots put a “non-exclusive” franchise tag on Cassell, meaning he is still free to negotiate with other teams, but the Patriots would have the right to match any offer (or recieve two 1st round picks as compensation).
I also question whether that contract would be binding if he were traded and signed to a long term deal by another team. In every other situation, teams and players have leeway in these matters when structuring extensions.
by LoveHate on Feb 8, 2009 1:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think a team that trades for him will have to pay the $14mil. Usually part of the conditions for the trade would be that Cassel would have to agree to a new contract. I still think Cassel is plan A for the vikings. The question mark is how Cassel will perform with out the Patriot wideouts. Warner and Mcnabb will cost the same amount of money or possibly even more. Plus they both probably only have a couple of productive years left in the league. Warner has the same question mark as Cassel, what will he do without the two studs he currently throws to. In my opion Mcnabb is very inconsistent. I say take the risk with Cassel and pick up a solid left tackle in free agency.
by taf442001 on Feb 8, 2009 1:21 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
agreed taf442001
Basically, as I understand it, this is how it would go. The Patriots would trade Cassell to the highest bidding team. The Patriots would restructure Cassell’s contract to match what the other team/Cassell agreed on. Then when Cassell got traded to the other team, He would come with the new contract, not a one year franchise tag salary.
by PurplePeopleEaters09 on Feb 8, 2009 2:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
On a random note
Check out that mock draft that is linked in this article. Sanchez dropping to 22? I doubt it. But like it’s said, Sanchez would be a dream. There is only one problem I see with that. I believe the Vikings will not wait until the draft to deal with the QB position. The front office believes there will not be a QB available at 22, so they will not wait and hold out hope. So if Sanchez was available, picking him would depend on who the Vikings brought in. Say the Vikings work out a deal and get Cassell. Would they still draft Sanchez at 22 if he was available? I doubt it.
by PurplePeopleEaters09 on Feb 8, 2009 2:54 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Even if Sanchez is available
You still don’t give the keys to this team to an unproven rookie. The vets on this team probably have a sense of urgency about them that won’t tolerate a move like that, and Childress would not only have to deal with a rookie QB, but a locker room revolt.
They need a vet that they feel they can make a serious run with, and if Cassel is the guy, I can live with that. His track record isn’t as proven as Warner, Hasselbeck, or Favre, but he’s a guy that I think would bring a sense of confidence to the team as a whole.
Thoughts on the Vikings, Buckeyes, and Cardinals
www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com
by MilCardFan on Feb 8, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Forget Cassel
Why are we still talking about Matt Cassel?? The frachis tag has been slapped on him so forget it, not worth the draft picks.
I hope the draft plays out like the mock draft here suggests. If it does the Vikes would definatly grab Sanchez, you just cant pass up an opportunity to draft a franchise QB. Would he start immediatly? Doubt it. We’ll see how the combine goes, but its not likely that Sanchez will be available here in which case the Vikes need to draft the best player available.
I just wish T-Jack would have started the whole season so we would now know exactly what we have in him, I’m still unsure.
by Spartan99 on Feb 8, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, say the mock draft is right and we take Sanchez. He doesn’t start immediately – fine. But who is he going to learn from? T-Jack? Chilly? The ideal situation is to draft the franchise QB and let him learn from a veteran. I just don’t want another situation like with T-Jack now…great potential, good flashes, but (maybe) unable to remain consistent. Not to mention we don’t have the time to bring along slowly…everyone knows we are built to win now.
by cutlassbob on Feb 8, 2009 6:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cassel's Franchise Tag
With all due respect to Gonzo, he is wrong. Cassel signed a “non-exclusive” franchise tag that means he and his agent can negotiate with any team that interests them. If they find a potential home, the agent can notify the Patriots so that negotiations may take place. Also, if another team agrees to a trade with the Patriots they will need to negotiate a contract with Cassel. The franchise tag only applies to the Patriots.
by capatriot on Feb 8, 2009 4:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I might be mistaken
But I thought that those rules would have applied before he signed the tender. Now that he’s signed the tender, according to the ESPN article, he can’t try to sell his services to other teams.
Cassell has officially signed the tender. The Pats can still deal him, but Cassell is no longer free to make his rounds around the league. That’s my understanding, anyway. If I’m wrong, I’ll put a correction together, but I got my info from the ESPN article that’s linked in the article.
The next step is for the Patriots to send Cassel a contract. Cassel effectively will not be a free agent come Feb. 27 and will not be permitted to shop himself to other teams. The Patriots could still trade Cassel.
Cassel faxed his acceptance to the Patriots, the NFL and the NFLPA on Saturday. That means a $14.651 million salary for 2009 in guaranteed even though he has not signed a one-year contract yet.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
by Gonzo on Feb 8, 2009 4:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Check it out.
Jared Allen was franchised by the Chiefs and was reportedly due to earn $8.8 mil before the Vikings trade went through. Check out what was his base pay was this year (08); a hint, it was nowhere near 8 million dollars.
by LoveHate on Feb 8, 2009 9:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
To be a little more accurate when discussing the Patriots dire need to trade Cassell at this point, he and Brady’s combined cap number with be approx $29.2 million. Everyone believes the league cap will continue to rise at its expected pace and therefore should be approx $123 million.
So, Brady’s and Cassell’s combined contracts will account for less than 24% of NE’s payroll. It is still a hefty number, but less than a quarter and almost a third are very different.
by LoveHate on Feb 8, 2009 9:07 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
you are correct
I re-read the info, and you are correct. But even still, having 24% of your cap devoted to 3.8% of your entire roster is not a good thing. I could see it working in a situation like Arizona, where both LFitz and Boldin eat up huge chunks of their cap space. But both of those players are on the field at the same time. (Usually). To have that much devoted to a position where only one of those players plays in the game and the other one rides pine is not a good thing. The Patriots are in a bad situation negotiation wise and every other team knows it. I’m not saying the Patriots are dumb. In fact, I have said the complete opposite. They are one of the best teams in the league (both coaching and front office.) IMO, NE did the only thing they could do and franchise Cassell. They know he is a valued commodity around the league, and they just want to get some sort of compensation out of him.
by PurplePeopleEaters09 on Feb 9, 2009 2:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If the Pats do not restructure someone’s contract, they will have 65 of the 123 million dedicated to only 7 players. I don’t see that happening. Look for them to trade Casell once Brady is given the all clear.
"Skol pa fiskande"
by NobleSavage on Feb 9, 2009 1:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
here is ESPN's take on Cassell
Cassel is coming off his fourth year in the league and obviously made a huge impact on his team and the league with his play. He developed each week in New England’s passing game by making good decisions and getting the ball to all levels of the field with a high rate of accuracy. He doesn’t have great speed, but he can pull the ball down and move the chains effectively. He stands tall in the pocket and has great vision. He has good weight transfer, release quickness and mechanics when given time in the pocket. Cassel has also made some nice throws, when eluding pressure from different angles. He is adept at finding his second and third options, but has taken too many sacks in his first year as the starter. Cassell has a strong arm to make throws at all levels. He is a good ball-faker and appears to have an excellent grasp of the Patriots’ offense. He can check off and get his offense into mismatches in both the passing and running game. Cassel has shown himself to be a competent quarterback who could start for several clubs, but it shouldn’t be underestimated that he has outstanding targets to throw to.
Again, even ESPN credits NE’s WR’s for some of Cassell’s production. There is no denying that fact. But the same can be said for AD. AD has an excellent line to pave the way for him. While the line helps Peterson, does that mean he should be discredited because of that? No.
by PurplePeopleEaters09 on Feb 9, 2009 1:59 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Just to make the rundown comparison, I'll quote the ESPN opinion
Cassel is coming off his fourth year in the league and obviously made a huge impact on his team and the league with his play. He developed each week in New England’s passing game by making good decisions and getting the ball to all levels of the field with a high rate of accuracy (Jackson hasn’t done the same in Minnesota for more than a game or two in a row). He doesn’t have great speed, but he can pull the ball down and move the chains effectively (Jackson can do this but at times he doesn’t want to for some reason. One of the more puzzling things about him imo). He stands tall in the pocket and has great vision (using the words “great” and “vision” in the same sentence as the words “Tarvaris” or “Jackson” constitutes material for a comedy routine). He has good weight transfer, release quickness and mechanics when given time in the pocket (not one of his strong suits, I wonder how long a QB can reasonably expect a line to block for him?). Cassel has also made some nice throws, when eluding pressure from different angles (seems like when the pressure comes, Jackson tends to panic. I can count on one hand the number on accurate passes he’s made under pressure…and I’m missing two fingers from a lawnmower accident—no, not really). He is adept at finding his second and third options (ummm no), but has taken too many sacks in his first year as the starter ( I don’t know that Jackson takes many sacks. Maybe he does but I never noticed). Cassell has a strong arm to make throws at all levels (Jackson does have a strong enough arm to get the job done). He is a good ball-faker and appears to have an excellent grasp of the Patriots’ offense (I don’t think we do much play-action passing which is more than a little ridiculous. But that’s Childress for you. More than a little ridiculous. I don’t even know if Childress has a grasp on the offense to be honest). He can check off and get his offense into mismatches in both the passing and running game (ummm no). Cassel has shown himself to be a competent quarterback who could start for several clubs (name another one that Jackson would start for right now. Yeah, it is hard to do isn’t it?) but it shouldn’t be underestimated that he has outstanding targets to throw to (but it also shouldn’t be understated that the Patriots had no running game and he still made the throws)
Basically, Cassel had good receivers and got the ball to them. That is what you’re expected to do as an NFL QB right?
by Bodysuit Man on Feb 9, 2009 9:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
One big one
Cassell started all 16 games and developed each week. Whereas Jackson really only played in spots (only six and a half games) during the season thereby stunting any development one could have hoped to see.
by LoveHate on Feb 9, 2009 11:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sanchez
Would be a nice option. I highly doubt the Vikes are going to give up what the Patriots will likely demand for Cassel so we should certainly be looking elsewhere. As others have mentioned, I ’m not even sure Cassel is really the long term answer for any team.
Visit my D2 Baseball Blog - Northern Sun Baseball
by FishingMN on Feb 9, 2009 6:11 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wheeling and Dealing
Negotiation season is wide open and there’s no real reason to expect the Vikes top 1st round pick to remain at #22 if the front office really thinks they can make out by working a deal with some very needy team out there.
I think that if the Vikes really thought Sanchez or some other QB in the draft was the answer, they could jump for him and have a good chance of landing him. It’s still going to likely take years to bring a newb QB up to speed, and they’ll still need a solid vet to teach him.
FA’s looking like a bust for 1st string QBs, the draft is a development crap-shoot, there’s really only one thing left…. Trade. It worked to land Allen, it could work again.
by DCPurple on Feb 9, 2009 9:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you DCP that the best options for a Viking QB are through trade, but…I would also hate to see the Vikes manage their roster like the Yankees where they blow big $$ on postions they need now by giving away the talent they need in the future. Two years of giving up 1st round picks and more could have the same effect that the Hurschel Walker trade had on Vikings teams after that debacle.
by Tuba on Feb 9, 2009 1:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Boy, I don't know if I'd compare it to the Walker trade.
The Vikings magically transformed the Cowboys into a 90’s dynasty and made a mediocre coach like Jimmy Johnson look like a mastermind. If the Vikes do not trade their #1, then I think they should take the best player available regardless of position.
"Skol pa fiskande"
by NobleSavage on Feb 9, 2009 3:32 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
It wouldn't
be exactly like the Walker trade. But in terms of the amount of draft picks we would have given up in the last two years, it would be close. And by the way teams build through the draft in these days, it could be pretty close. Not even talking about how well Cassel performs in return, but take away our 1st and 3rd round picks from the two years before 2008 and see what we would have missed out on. from 2007, Adrian Peterson and Marcus Mcauley. And 2006, Chad Greenway, Tavaris Jackson and give or take Ray Edwards.
That is the league’s biggest superstar runnningback, Our starting quarterback(as of now), Our starting left end, starting linebacker(prowbowl calliber) and a reserve CB. Look at how much we could be giving up by all those picks. Losing two 1st and three 3rd rounders could set us back quite a bit.
It’s just not worth it. Especially when your paying all that money. Now I know draft picks are hit and miss. But we would be giving up atleast a couple of starters, and some developemental players. you just can’t give up that many draft picks!
by mattscards77 on Feb 9, 2009 9:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
MilCardFan has a well researched Fanpost titled Estimating Draft Value that covers what I was trying to say in the earlier post, only with clarity and stats.
I agree that Cassel is not worth giving up the draft picks
by Tuba on Feb 9, 2009 10:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
To be fair, you have to take the positions into account as well. Last year we had the 15th pick, I believe. This year, its the 22nd. For the Peterson pick, it was number 7 overall, for the Greenway pick I think it was in the top 10 as well, wasn’t it? Last season, we really didn’t miss out on much. The better tackles got taken early, and with our pick Detroit picked up some O-lineman who just wound up hurting his back and rarely playing anyways.
First round picks also cost a ton of money. And that’s before they’ve even show whether they can make it in the NFL or not. What the team needs right now is a QB who can make throws to open recievers when the defense is stacking the box to stop Peterson. We certainly aren’t going to find one in the draft at our position, and we aren’t going to be able to get a premier QB from free agency either. McNabb, Garcia, and Warner are the names I see most frequently. Warner has already come out to say he wants to stick to Arizona. McNabb has claimed he wants to stay in Philidelphia for whatever reason. Garcia may be released, but I don’t see it happening. That’s not even mentioning their ages.
Cassel has been in the league for 4 years, he started last year, and obviously he picked the system up pretty well. I don’t think its a stretch of the imagination to see him picking up Childress’ system after mastering Belichick’s. If we get him some better WRs, he’s shown that he can be a very capable QB.
by Frost on Feb 10, 2009 2:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Garcia is an UFA.
He doesn’t need to be released.
by BeardedAxe on Feb 11, 2009 1:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I meant resigned, but since they just signed McCown, he’s the oddman out and should be available come Feb 27th. He’ll probably be in purple next season.
by Frost on Feb 14, 2009 11:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Or
The Pats look to the future and trade Brady and keep Cassel might sound far fetched but something to contemplate.Its something I see the Pats doing by the 3rd preseason game to not allow Brady much time to gel with his new team.Brady though a good QB hasnt had many injuries also has had the same teammates.I see the Pats shopping Brady and wouldnt hurt my feelings see him in purple,much better then the ever retiring one.
by speedlod on Feb 10, 2009 12:29 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
lol I entertained this idea waaaay back, after Cassel had his second 400 yard game in a row. But I don’t see it happening. I know they did it to Bledsoe, but Brady still has many good years left by all accounts.
by Frost on Feb 10, 2009 2:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
if that were true
I would probably die. No joking. Probably have a heart attack. After I jumped up and kissed my TV (or computer, whichever I learned of the trade first) about 1,000 times just like how little school girls used to jump up and down and kiss their tv’s whenever Backstreet boys were playing!
by PurplePeopleEaters09 on Feb 10, 2009 12:36 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















