Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Fighters React to Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Brett Favre, Fran Tarkenton, and Loyalty

Fran Tarkenton's comments to 790 The Zone in Atlanta have made plenty of noise around the blogosphere, and rightfully so -- I think he said what many football fans have thought about Brett Favre for quite some time:

Here’s an organization that was loyal to him for 17, 18 years, provided stability of organization, provided players. It just wasn’t about Brett Favre. In this day and time, we have glorified the Brett Favre’s of the world so much, they think it’s about them.

Some are criticizing the messenger, but most seem to generally be in agreement with Fran.  These comments, however, also raise an interesting issue that goes beyond Favre -- whether or not today's professional athletes feel any sense of loyalty to franchises, and whether or not they should feel any sense of loyalty to franchises.

Fran makes a solid point in that, for the most part, the Packers provided an excellent environment for Favre to succeed in.  And what does Brett do to repay them after spending 16 years in Green Bay?  He creates an offseason mess, a huge distraction for the team as it went back to training camp, and a nightmarish front office dilemma between looking to the future at the quarterback position or keeping Aaron Rodgers on the sidelines for another year.

For those wishing the superstars of sports would maintain a sense of loyalty to the teams that brought them to prominence, Favre is the perfect example that no such feelings exist any longer.  This guy was Green Bay Packers football for over a decade, but in an instant, he was off to New York City.

There's little question that Fran's on target in saying that Brett Favre has a self-centered mindset.  We saw that last summer.  But should we blame Brett for that?  Tough to say, in my opinion -- we're reminded more than ever that professional sports are a business, so maybe we shouldn't criticize Favre for looking out for himself.

Then again, it's hard to defend how Favre treated an organization that had treated him extremely well throughout his career.  Ultimately, I agree with Fran that Favre owed the Packers and the fans in Green Bay a much classier conclusion to his career, but generally speaking, I have a hard time with the argument that there should be more loyalty in sports.  Players have the right to look out for their self-interest -- they just need to be professional about it, and that's the part where Favre stepped in it big time last summer.

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yay for Favre bashing!

I think he went way further than just “looking out for himself.”

Even if team loyalty means less nowadays, he still owed the team and the fans better than what he gave them.

There’s a difference between looking out for yourself and being selfish, and he went way past that line.

In AP I trust
Just say no to Favre.

by FarvaForTheVikings on May 27, 2009 10:08 PM CDT reply actions  

No doubt

I really wouldn’t have had a problem with Favre making a comeback last summer if it didn’t turn into such a ridiculous mess with him and the Packers organization. He certainly did cross that line between doing what he felt was best for him and unnecessarily burning bridges.

by Anthony21 on May 27, 2009 10:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why are you blaming Favre for the whole mess?

Yes, he did say retire not to retire, but the Packers had their hand in what happened. It’s ridiculous to say it was all Brett. Unless anyone has any proof as to what really happened behind closed doors? I know I would be curious….

by favre4evr on Jun 2, 2009 5:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Foreman to the rescue

Waaa Waaa! Let’s see how long it takes you guys to discuss what Foreman had to say. It seems to me for every Fran, there are about 5 Foremen who think getting Favre makes sense for the Vikes. But the bias around here is starting to stink. Wake up, grow up, and realize it’s gonna happen.

by newmexvike on May 28, 2009 12:28 AM CDT reply actions  

Unlike most of my fellow Packers fans, I won’t claim that this is the first time that I have had cause to respect Tarkenton.
One of damn few, maybe; but, not the first.

newmexvike, I gotta join Tark in hoping that you are correct in saying that “it’s gonna happen,” as Favre’s success with/for the Vikings is as certain as the Packers’ annual trips to the Super Bowl from 1998 (the season, not the calendar year) through 2007 or the Jets’ wild success last year!
It seems to me that believing that the aquisition of a guy who hasn’t taken his team to a Super Bowl in more than 10 years is a team’s ticket to the Super Bowl is about as sane as repeatedly trying the exact same thing and expecting different results. LOL.
Therefore, I heartily concur with the Tarkenton comment, "I kind of hope it happens, so he can fail."

The Bears still suck!

by NorthStarr on May 28, 2009 2:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hope it doesn’t happen, because, well, I want him to fail. But I don’t want the Vikings to fail. It’s all very complicated…

In AP I trust
Just say no to Favre.

by FarvaForTheVikings on May 28, 2009 7:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Viking fans, if that's not a hint about Tark

When Packer fans start agreeing, you know it’s time to back up. Of course they don’t Favre winning a Superbowl in Minnesota. They’re all crapping bricks.

>>It seems to me that believing that the aquisition of a guy who hasn’t taken his team to a Super Bowl >>in more than 10 years is a team’s ticket to the Super Bowl is about as sane as repeatedly trying the >>exact same thing and expecting different results.

The same?? Hmmmmmmmm, oh wait, this time he’ll be playing with a real team. Your Packers sir, are a watered down version of an NFL team. Favre was the only thing keeping the Pack alive in several games of late against MN. Ted Thompson should be run out of town with the coach on his back. I can’t believe the way you’ve all turned your backs.

I still love Fran, but his post career has been disappointing at times. I won’t do a Packer-Favre on him or anything like that, but disappointed.

by newmexvike on May 28, 2009 8:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just in case no one else posts...

Here is Foreman’s response to Tarkenton’s quote:

"Number one, I’m a big Brett Favre fan. Number two, the New York Jets, where he went to play [in 2008], were a mediocre team or less when he got there and he took them to an above average team. He didn’t have the talent surrounding him, he had the injury. At 39, Brett Favre is better than 80 percent of the quarterbacks in the NFL anyway. I don’t think age should be a factor and if the man wants to play, he should be able to play.

"Loyalty in this game is not what it used to be. If you’re not playing well, they drop you like a hot iron. Brett Favre should play and I hope he’s playing with the Vikings. But as far as being selfish goes, I think some people need to look in the mirror. In this game, there’s some selfishness in all of us. So to say that Brett is selfish or that the Packers gave him … he gave the Packers just as much as they gave him.

"The Packers decided they no longer wanted him and they made their move and that’s understandable. But I’m tired of hearing people talk about guys when they get older that they should retire, especially when they can still play. I think if Brett Favre was here with the Vikings it automatically makes them a contender for a Super Bowl. We have everything. We have a defense, we’ve got Adrian Peterson. … Now don’t misunderstand, I respect and I care a lot about Fran and all that. But I don’t agree with his statement."

by newmexvike on May 28, 2009 8:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

I especially like the last paragraph. I have heard WWWAAAAYYYYY more ex-players sound like this.

by newmexvike on May 28, 2009 8:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

I've been a Favre to Vikings advocate for two years...

but if St Francis of Bloomington says ‘Fuck Him’,

then, by God, Fuck Him.

But that’s just me.

Thoughts on the Vikings, Buckeyes, and Cardinals

www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com

by Ted Glover on May 28, 2009 2:05 AM CDT reply actions  

yeah right, I’m buyin’ what you’re selling.

by newmexvike on May 28, 2009 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Team Loyalty

I agree that it is a shame what Favre is doing to the Packers, but these days I believe it would be hard for players to stay loyal when teams don’t seem to give a damn about loyalty. Anytime a teams loyalty comes into question, all they say is that it’s a business, get over it. Perfect example of this is Derrick Brooks with the Bucs. It’s a shame they would do that to him. So personally, if I was a professional athlete and saw examples of that, I think I would have a hard time being comepletely loyal too….

by shift47_brada on May 28, 2009 2:58 AM CDT reply actions  

Good Morning, Sunshine!

First… Rather than re-post my comment from the last thread before this one, I’ll just reference it, and add this;

The Vikings (and fans) are the last people who should bitch about a lack of loyalty from great QBs who are on their last legs….

Archie Manning
Jim McMahon
Warren Moon
Randall Cunningham
Brad Johnson

All come immediately to mind… I’m starting to be surprised that the Vikes don’t try to talk Joe Montana or Roger Staubach into returning for One Last Year.

Oh, and then there’s the shoe on the other foot;

Where was the franchise loyalty to Daunte Culpepper? Or to M&M? Or to Sharper? Or to Birk? How about that Ferrotte guy? Oh, that’s right, the Vikes squeezed the last useable juice from him and he’s done, not even worth keeping as a backup, not when we have T-Jack warming up and the entire off-season to find a replacement.

Where did Alan Page spend his final years? Or John Randle? Or Cris Carter?!? We loves us some Chester Taylor, but hey, he’s on his last year, maybe it’s time to see if he can be traded off.

So if folks want to get a tingle up their legs by playing at being shocked by the deplorable lack of loyalty of a team for it’s players… or a player for it’s team…. go right a head and enjoy yourself. But it’s either very naive, or they’re forgetting that this is a business, not a past-time.

by DCPurple on May 28, 2009 6:52 AM CDT reply actions  

I believe we tried to get

Dan Marino out of retirement at one point, too.

http://vikingsmashfootball.wordpress.com/

by BeardedAxe on May 28, 2009 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Right Here! My Loyal Purple People!!

Thank You for your support—-on my “Bicep Brett” comments.
Just looking out for the one’s I Love!

Best... Sir Francis

by Fran The Man Tarkenton on May 28, 2009 10:27 AM CDT reply actions  

No ring on your finger

Is that what this is all about? Brett has one and you dont? Or maybe you are afraid he will “outshine” your performance in Minnesota? You have lost alot of respect from your own fans. Any PROFESSIONAL person in the NFL or not that has any dignity would never ever make remarks about another “superb” record-breaking athlete as you have done. I think it all stems from your JEALOUSY and so do many others. Get over it Fran you never had a ring nor will you ever.

by favre4evr on Jun 3, 2009 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

loyalty

the nfl has become just another business. in fran’s day it wasn’t uncommon for a starting player to play his whole career for one team. now the reverse is true, it’s rare that any player stays with one team for his whole career. loyalty to the team as an employer is totally gone and it should be. the employer has no loyalty to the player, why should the player have loyalty to the employer.

but loyalty to the team is a different deal. the team isn’t the employer. it isn’t the owner or the coach or the front office. the team is the fans and the other guys busting their butts day after day to win. the ones who have made the player look good, the ones who show up to the games or tune in on tv. we are all a part of the team. what favre did to the packers was to piss off the team.

the classy ‘team loyal’ thing to do would have been to un-retire and sit the bench and back up rogers. it would have pissed off the front office too but it wouldn’t have pissed off the team. i’m all for favre wanting to play again. heck i want to play too! he has the ability even at 40, i don’t so more power to him. but don’t bust your teamates and the fans who have supported you your entire career just so you can tweak the nose of some guy in a suit.

just to clarify, the packers front office did their fair share last year as well as favre, but they weren’t in the huddle in the fourth quarter with less than a minute to go and down buy 6. favre was and those guys where there for him then and those fans were still in the stadium cheer them on and not giving up.

i’d just think a person would have more respect for that sort of thing.

by iseepurplepeople on May 28, 2009 11:44 AM CDT reply actions  

Hmmm-hypocrit? you tell me...

Fran Tarkenton ~ 69 ~ Fraud & Hypocrite
Go away Fran. Do you remember writing this when we all thought that other guy was going away?

Brett Favre has announced his retirement from the Green Bay Packers, and that’s a retirement announcement that nobody really wanted to hear, because we watched him have one of his best years last year.

You then wrote about him overcoming addiction, commenting:

But he changed his life and he became a great person, a great friend, a great father, a great husband, a great son…. Just everything you would like to have in a person regardless of his athletic appeal. And that is the thing that I admire about Brett Favre’s career more than anything else.

You finished with:

But in Brett Favre’s case, it’s really easy to say that here is a man that commands our respect for the changes that he made in his life that should inspire you and I, and people of all ages, that we don’t have to be like we are. We can be significantly better if we make up our minds to make the changes that we need to make.

And now you say:

“In this day and time, we have glorified the Brett Favre’s of the world so much, they think it’s about them. He goes to New York and bombs. He’s 39 years old. How would you like Ray Nitschke in his last year (playing for) the Vikings, or I retire, and go play for the Packers. I kind of hope it happens, so he can fail.”

You, sir, are a hypocrite. We already knew that you were a fraud. We want him to go away too but we don’t wish him failure. We’ll save that for you.

Slow down next time before you speak.

by favre4evr on Jun 2, 2009 6:20 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Deathstarvikings_small
2012 Draft Player Rankings: Top 10 UPDATE 1.0

Recent FanPosts

Small
Vincent Jackson?
Deathstarvikings_small
Siefert's All NFC North Team
Beardy_small
What luck... A potential FA LT that is actually good...
Small
Vikings 2012 Starting Offensive Linemen
Vikings3_small
Patriots after Spygate, 4-4 in playoffs 0-2 in SB
Snickers_small
What I'll Be Doing Today (Super Bowl)
Sophialoren_janemansfield1_small
Interesting RGIII interview with Sports Illustrated
Small
Good News Everyone
Biggun_small
Vote:Patriots or Giants
Small
Feeling Lucky?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Kira_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall