The Minnesota Vikings Will Sign Brett Favre. . .Unless They Don't. . .In Which Case, They Still Might. . .Possibly. . .
All the world's a stage
And all the men and women merely players
They have their exits and their entrances;
And one man in his time plays many parts. . .
If anybody out there needed a reminder of why we dislike Brett Favre around here as much as we do, I hope these past few days have refreshed your memories. At some point, I expect Favre to go out and file a lawsuit against the folks from TNT. . .because, hey, if anyone knows drama, it's Brett Favre.
Yes, all the contradicting stories that have come out of this situation this week have boggled the mind. To review. . .
First, Favre was given his official release by the New York J-E-T-S in the wake of their having drafted USC QB Mark Sanchez with the #5 pick in the 2009 NFL Draft.
Then, the Vikings had no comment on Favre.
Then, the Vikings said that they would "discuss" Favre.
After that, Favre sent a text message to ESPN analyst Trent Dilfer stating that he had no interest in coming back to the NFL.
Following that, the word was that Childress and Favre were going to meet somewhere in Mississippi in order to discuss Favre's possible return with the Vikings. Did I mention that, prior to this, Favre had said he wasn't coming back?
Of course, this meeting was news to Bus Cook, who has the minor task of being Brett Favre's agent, as he played the role of the Iraqi Information Minister and emphatically stated that Favre had no interest in coming back, even as Favre was expressing interest in coming back.
Then, after Childress and Favre spoke. . .via phone, not face-to-face. . .the word was that Favre wasn't coming back, and the drama came to an end. For approximately 30 seconds.
At that point, it came to light that Favre had sent x-rays of his injured shoulder to the Vikings. On top of that, the word now is that if "major shoulder surgery" isn't needed, Brett Favre will. . .indeed. . .sign with the Minnesota Vikings. Maybe.
Seriously, this crap needs to stop. While Brett Favre may or may not represent an upgrade at the QB position for the Minnesota Vikings on the field. . .a question that's still very much up for debate. . .the drama simply isn't worth it. In 2008, all Brett Favre wanted was to play for the Vikings, and the Green Bay Packers prevented that from being a possibility by trading him to the Jets and inserting clauses in the deal that would have screwed the Jets over had they attempted to trade him to the Vikings.
Now, just 8 months or so later, the path is clear. Brad Childress has made it blatantly obvious that he wants Favre in Minnesota. The Packers can't stand in the way of it happening, and neither can anybody else. I understand that he needs to be medically cleared after what happened to him last season. . .but if it's determined that the aforementioned "major surgery" isn't needed on Tuesday, the Vikings should demand that Favre have his name on a contract within 48 hours, or be prepared to go on without him.
I understand that nobody loves the drama more than Brett Favre does. I also understand that his lack of desire to go through off-season activities and other such events are part of the reason he does this sort of thing every year. However, he's also not a kid any more. He's going to turn 40 during the 2009 season, and if he signs with the Vikings, he'll be going into his third new offensive scheme in three years. He can't just waltz in the first day of training camp and expect to be ready to go. Yes, Childress' offense might be "similar" to what he ran in Green Bay. . .but it's not exactly the same.
To sanitize a commonly used phrase, both the Vikings and Brett Favre need to either defecate or remove themselves from the porcelain waste disposal device.
I'll be back, hopefully sometime this afternoon or this evening, with a look at whether or not Favre would actually represent an upgrade at the quarterback position for the Beloved Purple. Until then, continue enjoying your weekend, folks!
0 recs |
34 comments
|
Comments
Is it possible
to sue for damages to my sanity? Because Favre is absolutely driving me insane. I go from scared as hell to relieved to bewildered to resigned to thankful to…
This many mood changes in a five minute span cannot be healthy. I’m calling my lawyer.
In AP I trust
Brett Favre should go die somwhere
by FarvaForTheVikings on May 9, 2009 9:04 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually
If some Kenyan dude can sue for not getting any, then I think you can (and should) sue for this. Note his symptoms – stress, mental anguish, backaches and lack of sleep. Vikings fans suffer the same if not worse with this nonsense.
by Figgs on May 9, 2009 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Iraqi Information Minister
is a fresh new analogy. Otherwise I am bored with Favre. But it takes two to tango. And the Vikings (especially Childress) have been willing dance partners.
by Odin on May 9, 2009 9:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I seriously don’t think this is that big a deal. Are you telling me a bunch of grown men, pro football players, are going to be affected by this to the point it is going to hurt our season.?It’s May for god’s sake. Neither Sage or Tavaris has earned the right to expect the QB job, and if we wanna flirt with Favre for a week (or a month) in an attempt to improve the team, let’s just put up with it. I Favre a drama queen? Without a doubt. Will I care about these escapades if we end up winning 12 or 13 games come January? Not one bit.
by jjstraka on May 9, 2009 9:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
best reaction so far
great points
1. grown men
2. haven’t earned it yet
3. improve the team
4. winning is a great deoderant
by newmexvike on May 9, 2009 2:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Realize
That all the bitching and moaning traces back to us as fans wanting the info and places like ESPN taking every little notion and blowing it up. Realize that NOT ONCE has either Favre or Chilly came out and personally said ANYTHING to the media other than Chilly a while back saying ’’they’d discuss it’’. We only have ourselves to be pissed at because apparently our pining for information is so palpable that the news networks can’t help but spew it out. Trust me, if no one was paying attention, they wouldn’t put these reports out. Don’t get mad at Chilly or Favre for the waffling because neither have said or done anything to indicate the big picture. All we get is ‘’inside scoops’’ and ‘’sources close to the team’‘. Really? Someone needs to balls up and give us a concrete story from the Vikes or Favre. Anyone can speculate, and everyone already has from the looks at it. So you only have yourselves to be pissed at for obviously craving information (why else would you be scouring the websites and blogs)? My favorite is the person who comes on here to post how sick they are of a Brett Favre post IN A FRICKING BRETT FAVRE POST. If you don’t like it, don’t go online and look for it. IT IS THAT FRICKING SIMPLE. Open your eyes and realize we are like hatchlings in the nest, begging for the regurgitated, reconstituted information that “close sources” feel like spewing down our throats. Do you blame the bartender for forcing shots down your throat and stumbling into an alley to puke over yourself? No. So deal with it, enjoy the ride.
by Jepp The Viking on May 9, 2009 9:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Really?
I look at this, as well as many other NFL websites, every day. Who are you to chastise anyone for commenting on or following this story? And where else would someone post something in this matter?
by uncle jack on May 9, 2009 1:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with Jepp
I don’t even think Favre and the Vike’s are waffling. I think the only thing that waffles is the media’s perception of the one solid quote they may get and a bunch of hearsay from outsiders.
by newmexvike on May 9, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Favre
i do not hate favre,favre has the right to keep playing if he wants.packers try to pay favre to retired i do not think it’s up to the packers of saying who can keep playing and who can’t.with all the story going on and who is telling these reporter all the information that they heard this heard that should get all the fact straight before opening there mouth.let the vikings and brett favre talk before you assume what he is going to do.i do not blame favre for this false information i blame the the person who is spreading the drama’s instead of finding out that facts.
by subzero on May 9, 2009 11:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Favre is a drama queen. There is no denying that.. But seriously, the damn media is to blame for all of this! If you think about it, Favre hasn’t made any comments what so ever. The only thing he said was “NO” to Trent Dilfer asking him a bunch of questions about all the rumors going around. I don’t think he ever really responded to any certain question from Dillhole, but just gave him a no as if to say he didnt want to talk to Trent. I’m just so tired of the media being able to just report any bullshit lie they want, and there are no consequenses… I have hated Favre for the majority of my life, but I hate the Packers more, and would love to see their beloved Bret Favvvvv-ra in a purple number four vikings jersey!
by shift47_brada on May 9, 2009 11:25 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
great post!
IMO… A lot of this is media outlets jumping too quickly to deduce what is going on. Personally I think we should ignore most of what is printed out there and only consider a few facts until they change…
First, as far as I can tell and as NFL Network points out, Brett or his agent have always spoke in the present tense. Meaning Brett “is” retired. Not, Brett is staying retired. Just that he is.
Second, Brett could put an end to this instantly be calling a press conference and saying" I am not coming back". The fact that he hasn’t done this should point out that he is at least considering it. Nothing else matters until he does that. Until he does don’t believe any of it.
by PurpleJesus on May 9, 2009 12:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Blame the fans and media
We feed the media money, they feed us bloated stories. Brett Favre certainly has the ability to squash the drama, but I have no idea if he “loves it” or not because the MSM, mainly ESPN just love mindlessly droning on about dumb BS, and face it folks, we love and pay to hear it. Like someone said above, the fact that there is very little actual facts out about this means both parties aren’t really forcing the news out there, its all inflated by douchesque reporting.
As for this, I honestly don’t care. I think it is 50/50 wether we would be better with Favre or not. So I really just want it to be over with one way or the other. Although for selfish reasons(I live in PA) maybe I could get to see more Vikings games on TV with the Favre hype.
Black Shoes.
Basic Blues.
No Name.
All Game.
by Roland86 on May 9, 2009 12:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
is this old or what?
So much for Favre riding quietly off into the sunset, huh? The Vikings need to put an end to this. I don’t believe Favre will help the Vikes at all. If Favre plays for the Vikings, I think it will be a repeat of when Joe Namath played for the Rams. Might show my age a bit, but it was sad to watch. Favre was a great player, but its over. The Vikings need to shut this down. Its just not something any team needs. I’ve been a Vikings fan almost as long as there have been a Vikings team. (still have my first Vikings poster, copyright 1968) The QB carousel has to stop sometime. Chilly hung his hat on Jackson, so start him. What happens, happens. Only going into his forth year and only played in 25 games. Give the kid a shot. I don’t think he could have been any worse than Gus. But to bring Farve on, then what? Maybe get a year out of him and start over? Sage has been in the league for 8 years and has only been a backup. I don’t think that’s much of an upgrade. Probably been a backup that long for a reason. The Vikings need to say “this is our quarterback” , whoever that may be, and move on. However, Farve is not the answer. By the way Gonzo, nice touch with the Iraq reference.
by uncle jack on May 9, 2009 12:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Taking a vacation
From the Favre crap. All I will say is that if anything is true, we dont sign the self indulgent, headline grabbing, egomaniac drama queen.
There, my last post, including any response, until this crap is over one way or the other.
"If you're gonna shoot, shoot, don't talk"
by VikesFaninNM on May 9, 2009 1:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
please stay retired
born and raised vikings fan — i’ve seen all but 3 games since 1991 week 1 @CHI (first game was the beginning of a long, painful journey losing 6-10 despite having talent).
Please don’t let Brett Favre come to the Vikings. Jackson has look improved with every start minus maybe the eagles game but he wasn’t the reason we lost the game. I’d like to see Jackson the starter with Sage serving as a very solid backup. Brett will ruin the chemistry that has been years in the making to get to this point.
by pat- on May 9, 2009 2:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Chemistry that has been years in the making??? They just aquired Sage Rosenchopper this off season. I don’t think there is any chemistry there yet… Pro football teams are like a revolving door. Guys are always coming and going. I’m tired of waiting around for T-Jack to become something. Bring Favre in for a season and let Jackson learn a few things from the future hall of famer.
by shift47_brada on May 9, 2009 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn’t the reason we lost the playoff game? What about the free TD he gave to Asante Samuel to put us in the hole to begin with? The Westbrook TD took all the wind out of our sails because we were already down by 2 and that made it 9 with 6 minutes left. Without the INT this would have been a whole different game… He lost it for us. We deserved to win. Outplayed them in every aspect except QB play and passing yards.
by PurpleJesus on May 9, 2009 10:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I AGREE, do something now, not later
We’ve got a great team as it is, and its not healthy to have 2 quarterbacks competing for a starting job to be replaced from someone on the outside a month before the season. I am a fan that believes in Jackson. Although you can easily point out lots of negatives, and times where he didn’t make great decisions, he also has showed in games that he can lead a team. You can talk about the 8-10 losses but you can’t neglect the 12 + wins. He’s coming into his fourth year, and his 2nd as the projected starter. We havn’t seen him play a full 16 game season, and I think for Jackson to really exploit his success he needs to stay healthy for all 16 games and do it by showing leadership, and confidence. But, this chatter could all be pointless when Favre signs with us in a month and a half, and the development will have been all but washed up.
by PurpleJesuZ on May 9, 2009 2:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Done.
I’m done commenting on the ’ol Mississippi Drama Queen and any potential future relationship between said Drama Queen and the Vikings until one of two things happens:
(1) Brett Favre signs a contract, preferrably in his own Vicodin-tainted blood, on live TV, agreeing to play for the Minnesota Vikings, or
(2) November (not September, not October) of 2009 rolls around, and Brett Favre is still working the land in Mississippi.
Actually, I won’t bother commenting if Favre stays retired, so I will only say anything more on this story, anywhere, if Favre comes out of retirement and officially, un-ambiguously, without any doubt, announces un-categorically that he is definitely playing for the Vikings.
by Midnight Rambler on May 9, 2009 3:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm...
As much as I want this whole thing to just die, I am starting to really warm up to the idea of him waltzing his way onto the team.
Watch the highlights from weeks 14-17 of last year. I don’t see any loss of zing on the ball, save for a few underthrown long balls.
He is still able to zip it in there through tight coverage. At least 3 of the INT’s in those games can be attributed to balls bouncing off receivers hands.
Actually, just watch this replay:
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d80d8f0dc/WK-16-Brett-Favre-highlights
by Bjorno on May 9, 2009 5:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Texting to Dilfer....
Ok. WTH. Who in their right mind would text, talk, write, or in any other way, of their own free will, communicate with Trent Dilfer? I mean, seriously. I don’t buy that one. I think it’s just Dilfer’s way of trying to look like he’s connected, as if he’s relevant, part of the “in-crowd”, as if people like him, and talk to him, when we all know how silly a notion that is.
by DCPurple on May 9, 2009 10:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
So…Favre as a Viking? Really? I mean, I know that’s the team he wanted to go to last season, but he’s retired for good, right? I’m not so sure anymore.
Do I think Favre still has game? Absolutely. Do I think he is still starting quarterback material? Absolutely. My issue with Brett Favre is this: if you want to play, then play; if you want to retire, then retire.
I understand that people see last season as Brett’s failure, but come on. Remember that the Jets finished 9-7 last season, and the only reason that they didn’t make the post season was because of a couple of critical losses toward the end of the regular season. Losses that were not entirely Favre’s fault. Let’s not forget about the Jet’s defense, or lack thereof. So it is entirely unreasonable to throw the entirety of the blame onto Brett’s shoulders.
During Brett Favre’s season with the Jets, he fulfilled the job description of an NFL quarterback: the scapegoat of his team.
-Mr. Will
http://mrwillssports.blogspot.com/
by Mr will on May 10, 2009 8:58 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jepp
Thats not simple,this is simple.Just kiss my ass because I really dont need you telling me where to post or how to post.For the past 5yrs its been will he won the.Like said in prior post let me know when you become a Moderator here.Ill search for a new blog that allows free speech and allows P.O.V. I come here looking for news about my Vikings,and frankly have had enough about hearing if Lord Farve has farted this morning.IF you dont like my views dont read it,but the offer still stands.KISS MY ASS!
by speedlod on May 10, 2009 9:21 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You gotta use the reply button, man. Don’t be lazy now =P
by Frost on May 10, 2009 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
lol, I spent a few minutes trying to figure out what speedlod was responding to. I couldn’t find it, so am moving on.
by Lofoten on May 10, 2009 1:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
and now profootballtalk.com is reporting that Yahoo.com says that Favre didn't send X-Rays to Minnesota
Jesus Christ When will this END!
by Tony_O on May 10, 2009 11:21 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think
We all need to keep our eye on the ball here.
Brett Favre is a douchebag who thinks he’s too cool for school and shouldnt have to lead a team, mentor a young quarterback, show up to spring training, OTA’s or have dinner with his teammates.
Oh, and he’s also the face of the Packer organization. ( if not technically then in spirit)
We hate the packers. Screw Brett Favre.
by Hoss-Drone on May 10, 2009 4:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Minnesota QB History
Name one QB that has been in Minnesota since Fran Tarkenton was there that was respectable. There were a few that you could name, but if you think about it, they were at the end of their careers. Moon and Gannon are the only two that you could insert into that status and they were both has-beens. Cunningham was also at the end of the road. To me the real blame lies with the coaching staffs from the present and past. Culpepper was the closest thing to drafting a franchise QB that we have had in years and he was not the answer. He and Moss were a prolific pair, but not the answer. They should have drafted Cutler back when they had the chance and by not making any attempt to sign him this offseason, the Vikes have doomed their chances already this year. You have to have a QB to start with and then build from the inside out. By letting Birk sneak out of town and not trading for or drafting a franchise QB, management has let this team backslide another 5 years. Childress is supposed to be a QB guru, however, I am not impressed. Sage is a career back-up with a record of 6-6. WOW! that would scare any opposing defense.
by vikings_fan_1970 on May 10, 2009 7:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
I think that sometimes it depends on what the QB has to work with.
Let’s take Steve Young, for example. In his two years with the TB Bucs, he went 3-16, throwing 11 TDs and 21 Ints. Yet we now know him as the great San Francisco HoF QB that went to the Pro Bowl 7 times, and was the MVP for Superbowl XXIX.
Who’s to say that Sage can’t do the same or better?
by Lofoten on May 10, 2009 8:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But steve young came out of the usfl. He hadn’t been in the league for multiple years like Sage. Not really a good comparison considering the Bucs were the first pro team Young went to…. Sage will never be more than a backup
by shift47_brada on May 10, 2009 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gannon
Gannon didn’t really get good until after he left the Vikes, which makes him more of a poster-child for holding on to decent prospects until they’ve a good 7 years to mature.
In this regard, Sage, tho I like him and think he’s a good fit, hasn’t shown ‘1st string QB judgment’, and he’s had more than enough years to know that trying to force the ball, or run and jump over the top of guys who weigh twice as much as he does, are bad ideas.
by DCPurple on May 11, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're redirecting your frustration with the MEDIA at Vikings & Favre.
It’s worth pointing out that Brett Favre and the Vikings have said very little about what’s going on, and what little they have said is very consistent. You are reacting to unverified and contradictory rumors journalists and bloggers are putting out there, and then blaming Favre for them even though he had absolutely nothing to do with them.
Seriously, think about these wild day-to-day changes, and think about if Favre or Vikings have ever been the source, on the record, of a single one of them. Ironically you are really in the final analysis criticizing the the behavior of the media (which loosely defined includes you) in all this — not Favre or the Vikings.
by puddnhead on May 11, 2009 8:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















