A (Slightly Less) Insanely Early Look at the Vikings' Schedule, Part Four
Yes, only two months or so after the third installment of our look at the Vikings' schedule, I'm finally getting around to finishing it. Pretty awesome, huh? (Damn your black heart, Brett Favre.) I apologize for not having a lot of stuff on here outside of Favre this and Favre that recently, but. . .well. . .that's about the only Vikings-related thing there's been to talk about recently. News coming out of OTAs has been few and far between, the StarCaps case is still on hold. . .and Anthony pretty much has the Favre situation on lockdown. Behind the scenes, I'm still organizing the Podcast and stuff like that. . .it's going to be a live format, but I'm still working on dates, times, that sort of thing. As soon as I have everything figured out, it will be up here for everybody to access.
However, now it's time to look at the fourth quarter of the Vikings' 2009 schedule. The Vikings should have some solid momentum going their way at this point, and based on their first 12 games, I think there's a very good chance they could be looking at an 8-4/9-3 kind of mark before we head into the home stretch. If you need to review the previous three articles to remind yourselves where we're at, they're right here.
What will that last quarter hold? Let's take a look!
The Fourth Quarter - Elevation (See what I did there? U2 song titles. Why? Because U2 is awesome, that's why.)
The thirteenth game of the 2009 season will have the Beloved Purple playing host to the Cincinnati Bengals. Now, contrary to what a couple of folks I know think, I don't have the feeling that the Bengals will be that great this year. Even with the return of Carson Palmer, their offense is a mess, and Chad Johnson Douchenozzle Ochocinco is liable to go off at any time. Even if he's not in Bellevue by the time the Vikings and Bengals meet up, it's going to be a little bit rougher for him, as he'll no longer have T.J. Houshmandzadeh lined up on the other side of the formation. Chris Henry may or may not end up in jail again, too. . .really, you never know.
Cedric Benson is the #1 running back in town. Yeah, that Cedric Benson.
(pauses long enough to allow the laughter to subside)
I guess what I'm saying is that the Bengals should have trouble scoring against the Minnesota defense, to put it mildly.
The Vikings, on the other hand, should have no such problem. While the Bengals were #12 in the league in total yards allowed in 2008, they were 21st against the run. They were also a blistering 1-7 on the road. There are no easy wins in the National Football League. . .but I would be pretty surprised if Minnesota didn't handle this one with some level of ease. The final three games of the 2009 season, however, should be pretty tough. They're winnable football games, but they definitely won't be easy wins.
It starts out with what (as of now) is projected to be the first of two consecutive prime-time games for the Beloved Purple, as they travel to Bank of America (insert new name here) Stadium to take on the Carolina Panthers. I say projected to be consecutive prime-time games, because this game is on NBC's Sunday Night schedule, which means it could get "flexed" if there's another more compelling matchup out there. However, if these two teams play the way they're capable of, I wouldn't expect this game to get moved.
Now, we all remember the 2008 game between these two teams, with Antoine Winfield crushing Jake Delhomme and the defense completely dominating the second half as the Vikings won 20-10. The Panthers have one of the best one-two rushing tandems in the NFL in DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart. However, as we all know, this plays right into Minnesota's strength, and in last year's matchup the Viking defense limited Williams and Stewart to 42 yards and a touchdown on 17 carries. Adrian Peterson and Chester Taylor fared slightly better against Carolina's defense, combining for 121 yards on 28 carries. Considering that Carolina finished 3rd in the NFL in rushing yardage in 2008 (behind only the New York Giants and Atlanta Falcons), holding their backs to those sort of numbers again would be a tall order. . .but if any defense would be capable of it, it would be Minnesota's.
The outcome of this game could depend on whether we see "good" Jake Delhomme. . .and Delhomme has the capability to be pretty good when he's given sufficient time in the pocket. . .or whether we see the Jake Delhomme that showed up in the NFC Divisional Playoffs in January that used Arizona Cardinal defenders for target practice. If Jared Allen, Kevin Williams, and company can get after Delhomme the way they did in Minneapolis last year (where they registered five sacks), "bad" Delhomme could be out in full force (along with the boobirds) in Charlotte. This is one of the more interesting games on the schedule, though, and it could really go either way.
The final road game of the year will definitely occur in prime time, as the Vikings will travel to what should be a cold and blustery Soldier Field to take on the Chicago Bears. Last year's game at Soldier Field was a nightmare, with Gus Frerotte throwing four interceptions, Chris Kluwe being awful, and the special teams just being generally terrible. Despite all of that, the Vikings managed to stay within a touchdown of the Bears and put up their highest scoring output of the year in a 48-41 loss. Since I can't imagine the Vikings' special teams being that awful again, and I can't envision that many turnovers, this game could easily go the other way.
This will be the one game the Vikings play all season where weather should have any significant effect. . .and if it's anything like it usually is in Chicago in December, it's going to be a display of power football on both sides, and both defenses should be amped up and ready to go for this one. If that's the case, the easy choice is Adrian Peterson and Chester Taylor over Matt Forte and Kevin Jones, I think.
"But what about Jay Cutler," you might say. The thing is. . .the next time Jay Cutler carries his team in a big situation will be the first time. He was terrible down the stretch in 2008, and has never won a single NFL game that actually meant anything when there was any sort of pressure on him. Since this game could very easily be for the division title, it wouldn't surprise me one single bit to see the diva fall apart again, this time on national TV. I know it's a division game and you can throw the records out and all those other cliches. . .but if you could rest your team's chances of winning on the shoulders of either Adrian Peterson (who has put a team on his back before and carried them when they needed it) or Jay Cutler (who has really done no such thing). . .who are you taking? I know who I'm taking. Unfortunately, this is far from an automatic win. . .but it is winnable.
The season finale will be the same as the 2008 season finale, as the Vikings will play host to the New York Giants at the Metrodome. Yes, we heard all the crap last year. . ."the Vikings only beat the Giants' backups. The Giants starters would have destroyed the Vikings." Blah blah blah. The Vikings did enough in their first 15 games to put themselves in a situation where they could have a game against a team that had nothing to play for with a playoff spot on the line. The Bears had a game against a team that had nothing to play for with a playoff spot on the line, too. . .and they would have gotten in, had they beaten the Houston Texans. But, they didn't, so they got to sit at home and watch us in the post-season.
(Oh, and when the Giants pulled their starters, the Vikings were winning the football game. Minor thing, but I thought it should be mentioned.)
There's a good chance that one or both teams will be resting players for this one if there's nothing on the line. I can hope that the Vikings are in a situation to rest players, unless there's a first-round bye to be had or something like that. So, I'm not going to project this one too much, since we don't really know who's going to be on the field for either team at this point. However, if the season goes the way I've projected it for the first 15 games, there won't be as much concern for Game #16 as there will be for Game #17.
And that's the final look at the 2009 schedule, ladies and gentlemen! Despite what many of the "experts" are thinking at this point, I don't see any reason that this team can't be in the 10-6/11-5 range and celebrating their second consecutive NFC North division crown on or before 3 January 2010.
What do you think, folks? Agree? Disagree? Discuss it here!
0 recs |
20 comments
|
Comments
Agree with all of it. Except that I think that, while we have the advantage of a power-run offense come that december game in Chitown, their defense will also have the upper hand over our’s. They play outdoors in cold games for pretty much half the season. That will be the first cold weather-game our defense will be playing in that season, I believe. I’m expecting their defense to be much more acclimated, which should offset the difference in the RBs. It’ll be a close game either way.
by Frost on Jun 13, 2009 9:02 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i always thought defenses played better in the cold and it was the offense that had problems.
by iseepurplepeople on Jun 15, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Passing offenses typically have trouble in the cold. Power-running offenses seem to do better in it, because the passing game doesn’t work as well. I suppose it depends on how physical the defenders want to be. Like I was saying, the Bears will be used to the temp, so they’ll probably be more willing to get hit than our guys will be.
by Frost on Jun 15, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Being Optimistic
I mostly agree with one change; I’m a bit more optimistic, and think that the final will be more like 11-5 or 12-4. Unlike previous years, the 2009 Vikings were the next best thing to a carbon copy of the 2008 version with certain notable acquisitions which can only improve things. With easier schedule and hopefully, fewer season-ending injuries at the beginning, I think that 2009 is going to look very good indeed. Getting a week off to rest, going into the playoffs, by virtue of posting a better record, should also make a big difference in the post-season to come.
by DCPurple on Jun 13, 2009 9:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Farwell on S.Teams will make a big difference and... Oh yea...
Brett Favre at QB may help us to a 11-5 possibly 12-4 record too… but other than that. Yep.
Skol Vikes 4 Life!
by Macdaddy4508 on Jun 13, 2009 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunno...
Bottom line on Favre is that he’s an old guy, no amount of surgery is going to change 20 years of wear and tear on his body. I think that if he comes in, and plays every game all the way through, by the time we got to the playoffs he’d be used up, too tired to make a positive impact. Maybe I’m wrong, but if it were up to me, I’d play him sparingly through the year, then strap the old warhorse into full harness come December.
Even so, the more I think about it, the more certain I am that the only justification that Favre brings to the table is a Super Bowl ring. Anything less and the Vikes could definitely achieve it without him.
by DCPurple on Jun 13, 2009 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
schedule
The Bear game could be big trouble if Favre is the QB. That hard frozen ground won’t be kind to a 40 year old body.
Mort
If you can get your hands on the ball you should be able to catch it no matter what!
by Jimemort on Jun 13, 2009 3:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Palease.... Favre has to give the ball to A.P, or wildcat it with Percy
Possibly throw a fleet flicker and a couple Drop back and fire it in. He’ll be fine.
Skol Vikes 4 Life!
by Macdaddy4508 on Jun 13, 2009 4:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's what i'm saying
We won the division last year with Cement Shoes Gus Frerotte, and the worst ST’s in NFL History. I would think they could put something together with the experience of Favre, his abilities to read defenses and keep plays alive with Harvin, Shianco and Taylor in the slots.
by chaosg on Jun 13, 2009 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
His ability to lead the league in interceptions, force big passes, and lose big games should also come in handy.
In AP I trust
Just say no to Favre.
by FarvaForTheVikings on Jun 14, 2009 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gah
Force BAD passes
In AP I trust
Just say no to Favre.
by FarvaForTheVikings on Jun 14, 2009 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You got me there
However, I think Favre is a smarter QB than Rosenfels and Jackson combined. Rosenfels is a career back-up who threw more INT’s than TD’s last year. Also I don’t think Rosenfels has ever played in a playoff game neither. That gives T-Jackson more experience than Rosenfels, and that’s not good..lol
Not only that, but the Vikings aren’t selling tickets with Rosenfels and Jackson. If Favre sign’s, we won’t have a problem with blackouts.
Go Vikes!
by chaosg on Jun 14, 2009 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Publicity is the ONLY reason I would be less than furious with signing Favre. But it feels like selling our soul to the devil…
In AP I trust
Just say no to Favre.
by FarvaForTheVikings on Jun 14, 2009 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
what is that like +80 i’ve given you so far on this topic?
by iseepurplepeople on Jun 15, 2009 10:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The more points the merrier man! Glad you aren’t on the dark side.
In AP I trust
Just say no to Favre.
by FarvaForTheVikings on Jun 15, 2009 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eleven wins would be a disappointment.....
…..especially if Favre is behind the center this fall.
The team as it exists now can win 9 to 11 games. With Favre, they should be the best team in football, if not close.
Think about it, with the two headed running game, when they have found themselves behind, they did not have that gunslinger to bring them back. Favre would provide exactly that. With Harvin running routes all over the field, defenses will either be forced to spend a DB matching up with him, like a box and 1 in basketball, or they will have to try and play him with a zone, where he will be a nightmare. Either way, it frees up receivers for Favre and we all know that when he has time and open receivers, he will deliver the ball.
This could be a huge season in the dome. I hope.
Pack and Bears are less than human
by Purple People Eater on Jun 14, 2009 1:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Favre is definitely not that good. He definitely wouldn’t make us the best team in football. Not even close in my opinion.
But that’s the key, opinion. Everybody gets one.
In AP I trust
Just say no to Favre.
by FarvaForTheVikings on Jun 14, 2009 8:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















