The Universal Football League is Here. . .Feel the Excitement!
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, professional football's latest attempt to compete with the National Football League will be kicking off their season in October 2009, and they held their premiere draft for the league last night. Each of the four franchises (Las Vegas, Orlando, New York, San Francisco) selected 24 players to build their franchise around, and there are a few names on the list that should be fairly familiar to Vikings fans.
If you want to base your NFL cheering preferences on which team has the most former Vikings on the roster (at this point, anyway). . .it looks like the Orlando franchise is the one for you. Among their new additions are QB Brooks Bollinger, S Mike Doss, and TE Jermaine Wiggins. They aren't the only Viking alumni in the new league, however. Former Vikings' coach Denny Green will be the head coach of the San Francisco franchise, and former Vikings' defensive coordinator Ted Cottrell will be the head coach in Las Vegas (Jim Haslett and Jim Fassel will coach Orlando and Las Vegas, respectively).
The other former Vikings player in the UFL at this time is DB Oliver Celestin, who I know spent a season or two on the practice squad with the Vikings, but I'm not sure he ever made the big club. Marcus Fitzgerald, the younger brother of Larry that the Vikings took a look at after the draft, is a member of the San Francisco roster. With only about half of each team's 50-man roster filled out to this point, I'm sure we'll be seeing more Minnesota alumni popping up in the league as they progress towards their kickoff in October.
I'm not sure how wise an idea it is to try to go head-to-head with the NFL during their season, but the UFL might be worth a look. With only four teams for now, there won't be a lot of match-up variety or anything, but if they're successful in their first season, I'm sure there will be more to come. No other league has been successful in America, however (see also: the USFL, the XFL, the WLAF), and the odds are certainly against the UFL at the start.
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
you know i kind of hope this thing takes off a little bit. more football is never a bad thing. if they truly want to be successful they should focus on rivalries. maybe let the players get out of hand a few times and have some bench clearing brawls. let them hide cell phones in the endzone or sharpies in their socks. i want to see endzone celebrations like the ones in ‘the replacements’.
put in all the fun stuff that the nfl has taken away and they just might survive for awhile.
on a side note i think it sucks that wiggins isn’t in the nfl anymore. his style may have been ugly, but the man produced.
by iseepurplepeople on Jun 19, 2009 9:45 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
UFL/Minor markets
The catch of this league was to not compete in major market areas. I had written about this a few months back.
Areas such as: Oklahoma City, Portland, Birmingham, Louisville, Salt Lake, Memphis, have all supported college teams and some had good attendance with othe league failures. These are the markets that should be brought in. People will identify with them easier.
Putting teams in Orando (Bucs market), NY (they won’t get too excited with 2 teams already), San Fran (Oakland and niners). Vegas is the only none NFL market.
Absolutely stupid in my opinion.
I would have liked to seen it in the Spring so as to give people a football fix. It would also generate better TV audiance. Although I hear they are shooting for a Thurs night schedule. A late Spring and early summer season would give them a chance to sign older unsigned FA’s and undrafted college players.
4 teams is also a joke. Yah. I’m going to be excited over being the best of 4. That’s like saying the Vikings are a dynasty with their string of NFC central and recent North title.
This league had the right idea and drifted from it. Don’t go head to head in current NFL cities-It will fail!
I believe the old AFC was able to merge with the NFL cause they had teams in markets that were not in NFL.
by CitrusFLViking on Jun 19, 2009 11:05 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
my thoughts EXACTLY
put these teams in some smaller markets and they could find a lot of support from people who don’t get to see professional games very often.
put them in large market cities, where teams already exist, and nobody is going to care a lick.
very stupid, if you ask me.
V-I-K-I-N-G-S! Skol Vikings, Let's Go!!
by TheViking83 on Jun 19, 2009 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bring em to Portland
I’d go see their games!
by PurplePeopleEaters09 on Jun 19, 2009 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly. I love going to arena football games, it’s maybe $14 dollars for a front row seat to the Saginaw Sting (who were league champions). Cheap, good seats, some good promotions, faster games, it’s great. The talent may not be as high, but there are still some great players who are fun to watch.
Way better than the tickets I bought for the Lions game, even though it was against the Vikings. Ford Field was almost completely dead. Watching it on TV would’ve been roughly comparable.
In AP I trust
Just say no to Favre.
by FarvaForTheVikings on Jun 20, 2009 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
You pretty much nailed it, Citrus.
If this new league had started their season in, say, March… they might have been onto something worthwhile, maybe even pulled in some marquee NFL players to do some ‘moonlighting’. But running up against the NFL’s schedule is a great way to start the obituary.
by DCPurple on Jun 20, 2009 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You nailed it
But apparently the big investors in the UFL live in NY and SF, so 2 of the teams had to go there…
Apparently the NY team will play games in Hartford, and SF will play in Sacramento, maybe they could permanently relocate there. Still not as lucrative as San Antonio or Portland, though.
by SammyG on Jun 21, 2009 7:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You said it.
Being from Oklahoma (though now I’m in minneapolis), i can attest that UFL would be well-attended in Oklahoma City. Oklahoma is a huge football state, and OKC has undergone a “revival” of the old warehouse district that has been well received. I think even Nebraska or central Kansas could support a team.
Adding UFL teams to oversaturated NFL markets doesn’t make too much sense, but on the other hand, football fans there would probably appreciate tickets that cost less than $200 each. It’d be nice to take a family of 4 out to a game (much like a St Paul Saints game) without breaking the bank. So maybe it can work.
I just really wish UFL would do its thang during NFL offseason while we’re all jonesin’ for more ball.
May the wind be always at your back, and may your placekicker have icewater in his veins.
by juperee on Jun 23, 2009 12:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sad to say
Every league that has run a schedule during the NFL season, even when not competing on the same day’s, has failed miserably. And I agree with the assesment of putting teams in markets with NFL teams, save Vegas, is ludicrous. While reading up and the overall vision would work, not in the fall. USFL and XFL (before Vince McMahon started doing his WWF halftime schtick ruined it) are prime examples of this. The USFL before going head to head looked promising, though I think too quick expansion ruined it as well, but going to fall was the death bell. Im all for spring and summer leagues, as the revived USFL looks like it will stick to this time, I hope and also staying away from NFL cities. If these guys had stuck to what they intended, it would have been a great thing, but just don’t see it in the fall sadly with cities in the NFL.
"If you're gonna shoot, shoot, don't talk"
by VikesFaninNM on Jun 19, 2009 11:24 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Setting Sail into the Hurricance
It’s really nice to see guys like Brooks, and Germaine, and Mike finding employment in this economy.
Now, the bad news. Unfortunately, I think Denny should name his team the San Fran Earthquake, and acknowledge it is likely to be a big disaster, setting himself up for his “it is what we thought it was” speech.
People are not looking for new ways to spend money these days. As Roger Miller said, you can’t roller skate in a buffalo herd.
I bid them all bon voyage. Football is a noble ship, but then they billed the Titanic as being unsinkable. The market conditions are just like that guy’s XFL uniform once told us, “He Hate Me”
by Elgar on Jun 19, 2009 1:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes, folks, into the hurricance. It’s simply a mistake.
by Elgar on Jun 19, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't roller skate in a buffalo herd?
Que?
by PurplePeopleEaters09 on Jun 19, 2009 7:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't get to heaven on roller skates, either :)
by DCPurple on Jun 20, 2009 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That sounds like a challenge.
In AP I trust
Just say no to Favre.
by FarvaForTheVikings on Jun 20, 2009 9:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't take a taxi cab to Timbuktu
Life is hard…
by DCPurple on Jun 22, 2009 6:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They could do well-thats a big COULD
If they stay out of those areas. I still think later Spring start would be better. Football is a sport that will sell in smaller markets. Good young players that aren’t quite NFL ready can still work at a chance for the big show and some older names that get cut and can still play will give it some shine.
by CitrusFLViking on Jun 19, 2009 2:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Another fail league
They will play 1 season and will be done
"If at first you don't succeed - Skydiving isn't for you"
by Zoxide on Jun 19, 2009 2:26 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
No Room For A New League
The biggest reason a new football league will not succeed is because of market saturation. Colleges and the NFL already dominate the market. Colleges play all day Saturday and NFL plays all day Sunday during a season that stretches from August through February. Hell, nobody has time to watch every NFL game, now, much less more games from a new league with less talent and absolutely no tradition and team loyalty.
The AFL succeeded because in 1969 the NFL had only 16 teams. The AFL found receptive (and empty) markets in Houston, Boston, Miami, Kansas City, and Denver. And, when the Jets beat the Colts in Jan. 1969 they ripped a big piece of New York away from the Giants. Today the NFL has 32 teams, and the only large market left open in Los Angeles – which has never proven that it cares enough about football to sustain a pro football team in the first place.
Where will a new football league gain a new foothold besides (maybe) Los Angeles? And, when would a new football league play? Colleges have a stranglehold on Saturday, and the NFL has a stranglehold on Monday Night and Sunday. I suppose they could go all pay-per-view, but how many people are going to pay to watch teams with which they have no history and no loyalty?
A new football league was a good idea in the 1960’s, but not today. The UFL is destined to go the way of the USFL and XFL.
by aladdinwa on Jun 20, 2009 8:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh, yeah...
I forgot about the World Football League from 1974 and part of 1975.
by aladdinwa on Jun 20, 2009 8:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















