Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miikka Kiprusoff Wins 300th Game, Buffalo Crushes Boston

Three-and-outs


With all the talk about who will be the best option at QB for the Vikings this year and how team stats from last year compare to each other, I wondered if I could find stats showing the number of “true” three-and-outs given up by offenses and forced by defenses.

Star-divide

First, what is a “true” three-and out? I define this as when the offense takes the field and four plays later they punt. These stats should not include turnovers, penalties, or safeties, as these are tracked separately. A three-and out can be one of the most deflating moments in a game, not only to the team, but also to the crowd. There is no worse feeling than to watch the defense make a great stance only to have the offense come on the field and go three-and-out.

 

I searched, but could not find anyplace that tracked three-and-outs, so I decided to compile a few teams on my own. Of course the Vikings were my first choice. Then I thought I should choose the Super Bowl participants and a couple of the worst teams for comparison. I also chose the two best offenses. Surprisingly, neither made it to the “big show”. Finally, I chose the Jets for obvious reasons.

 

So without further adieu, here are the stats for “true” three and outs including how the offenses and defenses ranked at the end of the year in total yards.

 

Offense           3 & Outs          Rank                                  Defense        3 & Outs         Rank

 

Denver                 26                  2                                       Pittsburg          56                   1

New Orleans        28                  1                                       Minnesota       43                   6

NY Jets                32                  16                                     New Orleans    40                 23

Arizona                34                  4                                       Oakland           37                 27

Minnesota            38                  17                                     Arizona            35                 19

Pittsburg               40                  22                                    Detroit              33                 32

Oakland                55                  29                                    NY Jets            32                 16

Detroit                  55                  30                                    Denver             30                  29

 

Take these stats for what they are, but it does seem interesting, although maybe not surprising that the best teams rank highest in three-and-outs. I think it’s also plain to see why the Steelers won the Super Bowl. Wow, 56 times the defense forced a three-and out. That averages out to 3.5 per game. Pretty impressive.

This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

wow

Very nice job on this. Must have taken you a while to go through game logs and figure these out! Coming from a guy who is stats crazy, I’m impressed.

Now, to my analysis of these numbers…

I think the most glaring thing when looking at these lists is the importance of a defenseive 3 and out. On the defensive side, three of the top four (1, 6, 16, 19) went to the playoffs, and that fourth, the Jets, were close. The bottom four (23, 27, 29 ,32) on the defensive side all failed to make it past the regular season.

I think these numbers show that stopping the opposition in a quick fashion, is more important than being stopped in a quick fashion. I say this because the Steelers, the NFL champions, finished towards the bottom of the pack in offensive 3 and outs, and the Vikes finished a meager 17th.

Another thing worthy of noting is that the teams that finished 1, 2, and 4 in least amount of offensive 3 and outs, finished 1, 3, and 2 respectively, in total passing last season. In other words, the teams that are the best at passing, are also the best at avoiding the dreaded “three and out”. Makes sense, but its interesting to see put down on screen.

V-I-K-I-N-G-S! Skol Vikings, Let's Go!!

by TheViking83 on Jun 29, 2009 2:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, I kind of thought that the offensives with higher ranking passing would have the fewer 3 and outs. How many times do you see a team with 3rd and long and they just can’t convert. Jay Cutler is beginning to make me a bit nervous, although he won’t have the pass catching weapons he had in Denver. I actually thought that the Vikes were worse than what they turned out to be. But you’re right, the defensive side looks to be the dominant force when it comes to 3 and outs. It would be nice to see a full list with all the teams. Maybe people can collect data for 1 team each and add to the data.

"Skol pa fiskande"

by NobleSavage on Jun 29, 2009 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

It’s also plain to see why the Lions and the Raiders were so pitiful, 55 times going 3 and out…..terrible.

"Skol pa fiskande"

by NobleSavage on Jun 29, 2009 3:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Very interesting!

Thanks, NS, for showing us this, great food for thought!

This seems like a meaningful way of describing both offensive and defensive production, although it might be skewed a bit by time of possession in any given game, I think that over the course of a season and with all the teams, any variables might factor themselves out.

It also suggests that if Favre can repeat his performance from last year, as a minimum, he could make the difference we’ve been hoping for.

by DCPurple on Jun 30, 2009 9:55 AM CDT reply actions  

nice post ns. thanks for taking the time to share that with everyone.

by iseepurplepeople on Jun 30, 2009 12:35 PM CDT reply actions  

DITTO

Great read. Great analysis.

E.J. Henderson was gone for 3 quarters of the season, and with him in the line-up I believe we are a much stronger team in the pass rush, and better against the run. We should be in the top 10 again this year in defensive 3 and outs. I think the big stat missing is our special teams terrible play that had our team having to defend from terrible field position. So even though there was a 3 and out, we still would be starting at our own 20 or 30 or further back. Our team also has been AWESOME when teams get in the redzone. Its almost like a whole different defense when teams threaten the endzone. I know, its a smaller field to defend which makes it easier on the defense, but the intensity seems to be higher. I’d like to see the more aggressive play-calling from goal-line to goal-line.

SKOL

by PurpleJesuZ on Jun 30, 2009 8:48 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, can’t wait to see EJ on the field again. You are SO correct about last years special teams play. Field position is one of the biggest keys to being successful. I think we have improved in this department from last year. Again, can’t wait to see.

"Skol pa fiskande"

by NobleSavage on Jul 1, 2009 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Deathstarvikings_small
2012 Draft Player Rankings: Top 10 UPDATE 1.0
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Kira_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall