Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods Makes His 2012 PGA Tour Debut

Vikings Gone "Wild": The Loki Formation

With last week's OTAs, much of the buzz surrounding the Minnesota Vikings came from the fact that the team was experimenting with what, to this point, has been deemed the "Wildcat" formation.  It took the NFL by storm in 2008 when the Miami Dolphins pulled it out in a game against the New England Patriots.  Clearly, the Patriots weren't expecting such trickeration from the Fish, as the Dolphins scored four touchdowns in six "Wildcat" plays against New England en route to a 38-13 thrashing of the Patriots.

Now, I don't know if this is going to catch on or not, but I want to take this opportunity to dub the Vikings' version of this offense the "Loki" formation, after the Norse god of trickery and deception.  Why?  Because everyone seems to be calling theirs the "Wildcat" or the "Wild" something-or-other.  We should strive to be different, darn it.  Like I said, if it catches on, it catches on. . .if it doesn't, well, then I'll be the only person referring to it in that manner.  It's a win-win either way, really.

So, after the jump, let's break down a bit of the Loki formation and what it can potentially do for the Vikings.

Star-divide

 

The above video shows the three basic plays that we're going to be looking at in this particular piece, as they're the three "staple" plays of the Loki formation.  The man diagramming the plays is David Lee, who in this video was the Offensive Coordinator at the University of Arkansas and is currently the Quarterbacks Coach with the Miami Dolphins.  Arkansas ran what was called the "Wild Hog" formation, with star running back Darren McFadden taking the snaps from center and Felix Jones playing the role of the wingback in the offense.

The main upside of the Loki formation from a rushing standpoint is that it turns every play into an 11-on-11 situation.  In many running plays, the action is 11-on-10, with the quarterback handing the ball off or pitching it back to the running back, followed by a lot of standing around and watching.  In the case of the Loki, with the quarterback lined up wide (as we'll see in the formations here shortly), somebody has to account for him on the outside, and that turns things into an even battle.  Now, as we've all seen throughout the Brad Childress era, the Vikings are pretty darn good at running the football when it's 11-on-10.  Giving them an extra blocker could take this rushing offense from "great" to "freaking amazing."

The Vikings appear to have many players that could work themselves into the Loki formation in various roles, and in fact were rumored to have Percy Harvin, Chester Taylor, and Darius Reynaud all taking direct snaps in this formation.  Adrian Peterson would, no doubt, work into this formation as either the wing back or taking the snaps, depending on the play.  Speaking of the plays, let's take a look at the three main staple plays of the Loki that Lee talks about in the video.  The three pictures that I'll be using to illustrate these three plays are all courtesy of this article from RavensInsider.com (and a big thanks to Luft Krigare for tipping me off to said article).

Wildcat_steeler_3309_medium This play is the one that Lee refers to as "Steeler," which is a sweep play that's run out of the Loki formation.  This is pretty much the base formation for this particular offense.  Now, the first thing you'll notice is that the line is unbalanced.  To the weak side (left side, in this case), we have an eligible tight end and a guard next to the center.  On the other side, we have the other guard and both of our offensive tackles, with the quarterback out wide and covering the tackle on the strong side of the line.  Split farthest out to the left, we have the "wing back" that was played by the aforementioned Felix Jones in the video, and by Ricky Williams in the Miami version of the Wildcat.  We have a wide receiver slot right, an H-back or TE on the strong side behind the two tackles, and one of our Loki "quarterbacks" behind center to take the snap.

Now, I'm not sure if this would be the exact way that our OL would line up in the Loki formation, and there are some variations that can be run off of this, but when you hear someone talk about the "Wildcat," this is the formation they're talking about.  Not only is this the basic formation for this particular offensive set, but "Steeler" could sort of be considered the base play for it because, as we'll see here shortly, the other two offensive plays that we're going to look at work off of what this play does to the defensive pursuit.  Here's what it looks like on an NFL field, as demonstrated by the Miami Dolphins.

 

I know a lot of people will immediately think of Percy Harvin when they see this play, and rightfully so.  Harvin's speed could make him incredibly dangerous on this particular play.  But, man. . .tell me you wouldn't like to see a certain #28 coming across as the wing back in this formation and hauling it around the edge.  I feel sorry for the extra guy that would be left on the outside to face him.  Almost, anyway.

Wildcat_power_3309_mediumThis is the play that's referred to as "Power."  The formation remains the same, and as Lee says in the video, the objective is to take advantage of having "a whole lotta beef" on the strong side of the formation.  Nothing fancy about this one. . .the "quarterback" takes the snap, fakes the "Steeler" play around the strong side of the formation, and then slams it up into the middle.  The hope is that the misdirection of the fake could clear out the middle a little bit, but even if it doesn't, you should have a mismatch more often than not on the inside.  As Lee points out, this play can go into pretty much any gap on the strong side of the line.  In the diagram to the left there, the black arrow is where the play is supposed to go, in-between the center and the strong side guard.  However, it can go between the guard and the tackle, between the both tackles, or even to the outside if the back thinks that he can get the edge.

If Chester Taylor is going to be one of our Loki quarterbacks, this strikes me as the sort of play he could specialize in.  He's pretty good at making his reads behind the line of scrimmage, and he's tough enough to bring down where he could get the tough yards in this situation that this play seems to be designed to get.

Wildcat_counter_3309_mediumNow, THIS is the play where I think Percy Harvin (and, to a lesser extent, Darius Reynaud) could raise a significant amount of hell.  This is the play that's termed as either "Counter" or "70 Weak."  The formation is still the same, and we still have the wing back coming across the formation from the weak side.  Now, after having seen "Steeler" or "Power" a few times, the fake to the back coming across the formation should thoroughly leave the defense confused as to what's going on next.  All of the flow moves to the strong side. . .at which point the "quarterback" takes a counter-step, and cuts back in the opposite direction.

Somebody with the type of speed and quickness that Percy Harvin possesses could make some real hay on this one, I think.  As you can see in this particular video, one misstep against Percy Harvin is generally all it takes.

Yes, indeed, folks. . .if Brad Childress is serious about using the Loki formation, it could definitely add an element of surprise to the Minnesota offense, and I think that it would be incredibly effective.  Heck, with a rushing offense as good as Minnesota's, these three plays by themselves would probably be enough, but there are variations that can be made off of these plays as well.  The Dolphins have thrown out of this formation as well. . .in the aforementioned Patriots game, Ronnie Brown scored four TDs via the "Wildcat":  three on the ground and one coming on a touchdown pass he threw to TE Anthony Fasano (he also scored a TD in the more "conventional" way for a running back).  You can see the highlights of that Patriots/Dolphins game at NFL.com if you're interested.

I, quite frankly, am happy as heck to see that this offense might actually be ready to take a step to another level.  The Loki formation, in my opinion, could play a huge part in helping them do just that.  Now. . .let's hope that this isn't just something we hear about in May and June that's forgotten by September.  Oh, and don't panic if we don't see it in the pre-season. . .no point in tipping your hand in August, after all.

That's all for tonight, ladies and gentlemen.  I'm going to kill some time before Ice Road Truckers starts up in a couple of hours or so, and then get myself some sleep after a long weekend of feeling like crap.  We'll see you back here again tomorrow for more Vikings goodness.

Poll
How excited are you to see the Vikings potentially working the Loki formation into the offense?
Man, this is awesome! I can't wait!
317 votes
This has a lot of potential.
306 votes
I'm really not sure. This IS Brad Childress, after all.
253 votes
We're a year too late on this. Teams have it figured out.
95 votes
It's a gimmick offense and there's no way the Vikings can make it work.
69 votes

1040 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

            I was thinking “Northstar”, but “Loki” is much better. I am not as high as some on Loki being a big part of the offense. The Dolphins did surprise the Patriots, but frankly they could have done that to any other team since it was so new and no one had an immediate answer for how to stop it.
            Maybe most of the excitement is from how the Dolphins were 1-15 the year before and division champs the next. But in all fairness, that 1-15 team lost most of the offense to injury. Ronnie Brown wasn’t there, they lost 2 QBs and had to play a rookie QB, their #1 WR was a rookie and at least one o-line was down. I am sure they had a few on defense too and when you combine that with new coach, new system, and a tough schedule, it is going to be tough to put up points and win games.
           Then this year, they get everyone back healthy and a bonus of having a coach on staff that helped implement the “Wildhog” for Arkansas and McFadden the year before. Even in that game, the Dolphins didn’t line up exclusively in the Wildcat(I believe score each time they ran it, but how did that ratio hold up over the season?), but would shift and use it to confuse the D.
           While it helped turn there team around and give them confidence, let’s not forget how their season finished: 11-5, one and done in the playoffs. One game better in the regular season, but finished the same, division champs/one and done. Could running it last year have gotten an extra win or two? Maybe, but there is no proof that definitively says that and it surely wouldn’t have gotten the Vikings any deeper in the playoffs then they got themselves.
            There isn’t a lot of evidence, but after watching which teams played deep into the playoffs, its still much more important to develop your offense around a QB themed passing game and let the RBs just handling running and blocking. Loki has a lot of potential, but I wouldn’t expect to see it in every game and only for a few plays a game if it is.

by Josh_D on Jun 7, 2009 6:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Well, yeah, I get that

It’s not something you could base your entire offensive philosophy around or anything like that. . .but this offense needs a kick in the pants occasionally, and this could be what does it.

I’m looking forward to seeing how it’s implemented.

The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!

by Christopher Gates on Jun 7, 2009 6:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I am excited to see it all implemented too. It could make the whole offense better if it can be run well and have defenses worrying about how to stop it. I’m just trying to keep my excitement about it tempered until I see it on the field. Can’t wait for the season to start.

by Josh_D on Jun 7, 2009 7:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was thinking...

…something like “Norse Force” offense

Son, when you participate in sporting events, it's not whether you win or lose: it's how drunk you get. ~Homer Simpson

by thewild_viking_twins on Jun 8, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Don't Forget the People Behind the X's

The main element of surprise in this is not that no one has ever seen this offense before but rather that it is not your standard offensive formation and the defense will not know until the offense breaks from the huddle that the Vikings will align in such a radically different set. The defense will have to play against this Loki thing with the same cast of people as the more conventional plays.

Furthermore, it is the Viking actors playing the lead roles in this little Loki drama who will make the action get scary.

Who else could put the speed and power of both Harvin and AD as the two halfbacks? Who else can use the blocking Kliensasser and Dugan as the TE’s? Who else can have the adjacent tackles weigh in at about 680# combined? Who else will have the pulling guard be a guy named Hutch? This ain’t your grandmother’s trick play. This little contraption and its multiple surprise endings can put some hurt on you.

As Gonzo points out, the whole idea is that the man whom the defense thought was the quarterback (a Viking weighing 220 or more) will come out and block on a cornerback or safety and we will still have nine more blockers remaining to do more dirty work for us, whereas on the normal running plays, the quarterback doesn’t add much of anything to assist in the blocking.

The more the opposing defenses have to practice, remember, and think about on game day, the less of a jump they will get on running to the right places, and chasing Harvin or Peterson or Taylor or Reynaud will get you winded.

by Elgar on Jun 7, 2009 7:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Would it help the Vikes win the division? Yes.

The ability to run and pass are key for an offense in the playoff. The “Loki” (great name) adds another element to the run and can for a pass. Shifting into it would throw a defense into mass confusion, especially if it is a defense switching from a 4-3 and learning a 3-4 or one that has to use walkers just to get onto the field. It comes down to winning the division first, and the Loki would help the Vikings do just that.

As for the “counter”, I can see AD as well as Percy running it. Adrian has always liked to cut back against the grain especially when his primary hole closes. Add Chester into the mix and who would a defense key on?

It may take a village to raise a child, but it takes a Viking to raze a village.

by Luft Krigare on Jun 7, 2009 7:31 PM CDT reply actions  

This mixed in with our already explosive running game would be incredible.

Imagine T-Jack in as QB, we would so much speed. Our whole offense would be fast besides our O-Line of course, but damn.

I can outrun a mule deer.

by Gonzo2 on Jun 7, 2009 7:53 PM CDT reply actions  

Our O-line

The Loki puts both tackles on the same side. That means both Big Mac and the Load on the strong side and Jimmy Kleinsasser and Hutch leading the counter block. Think about it, whoever is running behind them has a great chance of breaking one any time they touch the ball.

It may take a village to raise a child, but it takes a Viking to raze a village.

by Luft Krigare on Jun 7, 2009 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

This would be awesome with T-Jackson

He’s the perfect QB for it, Mobile like a RB and strong enough to be used as a blocker too.

How do you defend an offense with athlete’s like Jackson, Peterson, Taylor and Harvin who can all run, catch and throw. Don’t forget about Berrian, Shianco and Rice neither.

I would think the crappiest of coach’s could design a playbook for this offense, and win the division. No excuses for Childress this year, he has everything he needs to win…IMO.

Go Vikes!

by chaosg on Jun 7, 2009 8:04 PM CDT reply actions  

I think Jackson would get thrown around if he tried to block. Remember the Philly game? He got bodyslammed like a ragdoll.

by Frost on Jun 7, 2009 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jackson wasn’t prepared to be a blocker for that play against Philly. T-Jackson has a build like a CB, and can bench-press more than any other QB in the league. He would have to work-out on a tackle-dummy, but I can’t think of a better QB for the Wild-Cat than Jackson.
Jackson wouldn’t be blocking big LB’s either. The WC has the QB lined-up against the CB or S. I think he could handle that for a few plays. If not, the WC will never work for the Vikings.

by chaosg on Jun 8, 2009 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

man i really

think our offense would be dangerous with this stuff implemented. Also, the clip of Harvin just makes me giddy.

Loki is a great name for this formation!

by skiumah06 on Jun 7, 2009 8:47 PM CDT reply actions  

+1

I agree. Loki’s a good name. I doubt the mainstream will take hold of it though.

by Frost on Jun 7, 2009 11:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

QB Exposed

What I see is an exposed QB. If he’s going to be blocking for the runner there is no rule that would prevent the CB or LB from separating his head from his shoulders. It might not be a smart move on any individual play, but when you can knock the opposing QB out of the game it’s always a good thing for the Defense, overall.

by aladdinwa on Jun 8, 2009 7:37 AM CDT reply actions  

A true Wildcat (Loki)

Would integrate multiple formation looks and adjusting those formations at the line. Often the illusion of a pro set and then shifted as they get at the line. Plays can also have the QB shifting off center to off guard and snaps going directly to the RB’s (who are split) for a power play run, counter or HB pass. QB dropping to a 3 back set with snaps going to any of the 3. It has a little wishbone in there but different in nature. You play with a standard formation but shift out of it to run a “razzle dazzle” type play or just run out of it making the D think they have to look for something that isn’t coming.
I had fun using the above formations and decoy formations, like the ones I mentioned, using different Viking players to draw up plays. I wish I had the computer savy to post some up. Be fun to see what kind of playbook the DN Nation could draw up.

I am all for us renaming the offense LOKI. I once heard how San Fran got all the credit for the West Coast offense. One old Viking veteran said that the Vikings and Fran were basicly running that long before the 49ers and Grant should have got credit for it.

PS Thanks for the prayers- I am going to Minny to see training camp and the 1st home pre season game. I’ll have to run all the little kids over in my mobility scooter to get Jared to autograph my jersey but I’ll be there. So excited!

by CitrusFLViking on Jun 8, 2009 10:55 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Deathstarvikings_small
2012 Draft Player Rankings: Top 10 UPDATE 1.0

Recent FanPosts

Deathstarvikings_small
Siefert's All NFC North Team
Beardy_small
What luck... A potential FA LT that is actually good...
Small
Vikings 2012 Starting Offensive Linemen
Vikings3_small
Patriots after Spygate, 4-4 in playoffs 0-2 in SB
Snickers_small
What I'll Be Doing Today (Super Bowl)
Sophialoren_janemansfield1_small
Interesting RGIII interview with Sports Illustrated
Small
Good News Everyone
Biggun_small
Vote:Patriots or Giants
Small
Feeling Lucky?
Morecowbell_small
Off Topic/ "Delocated" Edition

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Kira_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall