Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Chan Sung Jung Wins Thriller Over Dustin Poirier

Chilly Still Deciding on Friday's Starter

Classic Brad Childress right here.  Keep your upcoming opponent guessing by not revealing who the starting quarterback will be.  It's a tactic he often uses during a quarterback controversy, taking advantage of the controversy by not announcing the starter until the last minute so the week's opponent needs to prep for two quarterbacks.

But wait a second.  This is just the preseason.  The games don't matter.  Why on earth hasn't Chilly made up his mind yet on the starting quarterback for this Friday's game in Indianapolis?

Childress said he still hasn’t decided whether Tarvaris Jackson or Sage Rosenfels will start against the Colts but that ideally both will get equal reps.

Just make up your damn mind, Brad.  If you don't want to appear to favor one over the other, name Sage the starter and say it's because he was healthy for the entire two weeks of training camp.  Please, make a decision.

Let's skip the mind games and move forward.  That's what this seems like to me: Mind games.  But at some point, enough is enough and you've gotta level with your players. 

And when I complain about not knowing who the starter is for this week, I'm also speaking about the bigger picture here.  It would be classic Brad Childress to wait until the last minute to name his week one starter.  I'd be very disappointed if he did that but it also wouldn't surprise me.  Chilly: When you're set on the starting quarterback, just let us know who it is.  This team needs stability at quarterback, not prolonged indecisiveness from you.

Poll
Let's help Chilly out: Who should start on Friday?
Tarvaris Jackson
433 votes
Sage Rosenfels
581 votes

1014 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 54 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Chilly thinks he is sooooo clever.

The guy does the right things, at the wrong times.

I voted for Sage. I want to see him with the first team.

I want to see if Sage can run the offense. I don’t want Chilly starting Tjack just because he has his career on the line.

I certainly want Tjack to figure it out. But I also want this team to win. Let the best man win (go tjack).

by Bjorno on Aug 12, 2009 1:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Who

cares who starts? Preseason games are mostly meaningless unless someone sustains an injury.

by VikingBillArlingtonVA on Aug 12, 2009 9:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't care if he tells us whose starting - just tell the team

I get if BC wants to keep the week 1 starter secret from the public and the opposing team until right before game time. But, the players will need to know as soon as they start preparing for the game, which is typically after the 3rd preseason game. A couple days after the game, the minimum he should say is this “I’ve decided on a starting quarterback, but I’m not going to anounce it at this time”. I actually think that would be a good statement, not fan-friendly, but good game strategy.

by ChemErik on Aug 12, 2009 1:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Maybe the reason Chilly hasn't picked the starter

Is that he’s still not sure if he even has bona fide choices for starter. I certainly feel that way, it’d be kinda a coin toss for me.

by puddnhead on Aug 12, 2009 1:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Seriously dude.....

Who cares (other than the players like ChemErik pointed out)? It’s a pre-season game. I mean, I guess I could understand wanting to know just to know…. but it’s preseason. It seems like a kind of insignificant thing to get pissed off over.

I think people hate Chilly SO MUCH, that they’re willing to lambaste him for the most mundane, insignificant things….

by Figgs on Aug 12, 2009 1:54 PM CDT reply actions  

But what’s the upside to keeping it a secret? Is there upside in keeping T-Jack and Rosenfels hanging, along with the rest of the team. If you and Manimal aren’t bothered by it, that’s fine — but I can’t think of a strong rationale for Chilly to drag his feet on this.

by Anthony21 on Aug 12, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Have you been able to think of a strong rationale for any decisions Chilly makes, besides who he signs?

by Bjorno on Aug 12, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Haha

Well, good point. Again, I can understand people not caring about this…but I just don’t see what Chilly’s trying to do here.

by Anthony21 on Aug 12, 2009 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Motivation?

I really don’t know, that’s my best guess.

by Jesse on Aug 12, 2009 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe....

He really doesn’t know yet – might not want to jump the gun and think it through with his coaching staff.

Or maybe he reads this blog and he knew it’d piss you off – that’s what I’ve got my money on. =)

by Figgs on Aug 12, 2009 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

This really doesn't bother me a bit.

It’s the first game of the preseason. If he would have come out and said one or the other, that’s great, but I really don’t care either way. It doesn’t matter either way, so who cares who it is? Definitely nothing to get anyone’s panties in a bunch.

If it were the season opener, then yeah, of course there would be problems. But two weeks after training camp before the first preseason game? Definitely not a problem.

Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com

Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!

by Manimal on Aug 12, 2009 1:55 PM CDT reply actions  

The ONLY reason he could be doing this

is because he the competition hasn’t actually been won out-right by either of these guys. Which, if we go by what we know of both T-Jack and Sage, is consistent with the rest of their careers. Maybe if one of them played like they deserved the job, it’d be a different situation.

by Jesse on Aug 12, 2009 2:38 PM CDT reply actions  

Good Point

In fact, it seems that neither of these guys is capable of actually WINNING the job. The only question is who will LOSE it first. It’s like the lesser of two evils question we always encounter in politics.

Thus I salute the fortress,
Safe from terror and dread.
Wife, follow me
and dwell with me in Valhalla!

by Franciscan Viking on Aug 13, 2009 2:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

stoopid coach...stoopid QB

the only way we are gonna do well is if we get a QB who is a rebel and doesnt listen to Chilly…..unfortunately, our choices are a guy who in known to be incapable of thinking of his feet or learning (TJ) & Sage…a NFL jouneyman castoff who seems to be missing his opportunity to salvage a career….we are doomed

by marcnoodle on Aug 12, 2009 3:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Two words... Media Hype

If Childress names a “starter” today it’s’ going to be reported by every outlet that covers the Vikings that said “starter” is winning the quarterback battle, with the sub story of, can the other QB possibly catch up, which inevitably leads to questions of whether Chilli will be traveling down to Mississippi on bended knee begging Favre to come to Mankato and show these punks how to “sling it” Favre style.

There’s no reason to name one a starter and feed that fire since they’ll be getting equal reps anyway. So settle down and wait 2 more days for some purple and gold football.

Fire Childress!

by dwarg on Aug 12, 2009 3:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Rosenfels is what I think

It’s pretty obvious that the better looking player will be the starter though at the beginning of the year.

by suitup17 on Aug 12, 2009 3:46 PM CDT reply actions  

if its so OBvious why dont you help Chilly out and become the QB coach.

just kidding. There are a buttload of TJ haters here. I don’t know what you guys are thinking but I’ve been to Training Camp and TJ is blowing the Rosencopter out of the water.

by FutureViking43 on Aug 12, 2009 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

You sound like my wife

She freely admits she’s looking at the player’s tails more than the score, lolol!

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Aug 14, 2009 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ratings

If Chilly keeps Viking fans guessing, more people will tune in to the game just to see who the starter will be. Obviously, the people who read DN are some of the most passionate fans and are going to watch anyway, but others may not.

I’d wager 10 bucks that he knows who the starter is going to be, and maybe even the players know it. He just doesn’t want the media to know.

by Zoltan on Aug 12, 2009 5:08 PM CDT reply actions  

Bobby Wade knows.

But then Chilly promptly told him to tell the media he actually doesn’t.

by FutureViking43 on Aug 12, 2009 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I hope Bobby Wade goes.

Somwhere else b/c he is average at best. Jaymar Johnson, Darius Reynaud and Sidney Rice are just as good and can get better. Actually all three are better but they can still improve. Wade has hit his ceiling and it isn’t very high.

Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!

by VikesPma on Aug 12, 2009 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Those three may have more potential, but so far Wade has outplayed all of them. I’m not saying I’d rather dump one of those three instead of Wade, but I wouldn’t be happy if we dropped Wade prematurely because we thought these guys could possibly take over his role this year. I’d like to see them earn spots over Wade before we show him the door.

In AP I trust
Just say no to Favre.
F-A-R-V-A =/= F-A-V-R-E

by FarvaForTheVikings on Aug 13, 2009 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

T-Jack hater here

We haven’t had a QB with a football players mind since Fran folks. Tommy, Rich, Warren and Brad were close but……………………………………………………………………………..

Tommy liked the sauce.
Rich was a late bloomer.
Warrens best days were behind him.
Brad in his later years had a noodle arm.

It’s easy to question what I posted but Daunte, Randall and the legion of others were poor decision makers and ballhandlers IMO.

Mort

If you can get your hands on the ball you should be able to catch it no matter what!

by Jimemort on Aug 12, 2009 8:26 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm not gunna accuse you of racism but...

are you kidding? Culpepper and Randall Cunningham were great for us.

by FutureViking43 on Aug 12, 2009 8:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

racism? That’s just ridiculous. Oh and by the way, just by stating that, you basically called him a racist.

by dsludo on Aug 12, 2009 9:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

You sorta did subtly accuse him of racism...

Even though he mentioned Warren Moon.

http://sports-boards.net | Top notch sports discussion!

by vikesully on Aug 13, 2009 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

History is different than you have remembered it

Hall of Famer Warren Moon played in 2 of his 9 Pro Bowls as a Viking and still had enough in the tank to earn a trip at age 41 with the Seahawks. Tarkenton led the league in INTs and quit when he was 38. Warren was still earning trips to Hawaii.

Culpepper had at least 2 of the 10 or so greatest seasons by an NFL QB up to that time.

Cunningham was the MVP in ‘98, and he did it as a pocket passer (only 132 rushing yards and only 2 fumbles). What QB in the history of the game demonstrated more "football player’s mind" than Cunningham had in his career? Do you remember how wiry that dude was and how many hits he took again and again? In his spare time, he was into stonecutting.

You also forgot Jeff George (8 fumbles in the best year of his career which happened to be in MN) and Jim McMahon 4 fumbles in 12 games in ’93).

Others suggest that your words imply at least a little bit of racism because you’re only on board with the white HoF scrambling QB but dissing an MVP and HoF QBs who happen to be black as “poor decision makers” and not possessing “real football player minds.” The so-called rationale among old-school racists who did not allow black players to play the QB position always used codes like “they don’t have the mind for it” or “it’s a complex offense they probably can’t learn” and so on. Thankfully, that has been shot down numerous times by players like Culpepper, Cunningham, Moon, McNabb, and others; however, there are still those who do everything they can to discount and minimize anything and everything that those guys and others have achieved. Don’t be one of those.

by KC Viking on Aug 13, 2009 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Cunningham not MVP

Terrell Davis was MVP of the 98-99 season.

by peterplaysbass on Aug 13, 2009 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

But Cunningham WAS a Pro-Bowler that year, as well as an All-Pro.

Good enough if you ask me.

by Bjorno on Aug 13, 2009 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

T.Jack

Tavaris, if he is healthy will be starting week one. Sage has been dissappointing in training camp reports from Mankato also say he has nowhere near the arm strength Jackson does.

Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!

by VikesPma on Aug 12, 2009 8:41 PM CDT reply actions  

Arm strength is nice, but...

…who is more accurate?
…who can make the decisions without staring down the go-to receiver for 2 seconds first?
…who can look off and check down his receivers?
…who makes up his mind in less than 3 seconds with better results?
…who will fumble less often?

I don’t know enough about their performances in tc, and I honestly wouldn’t care who won the job as long as it was primarily based on these things rather than arm strength.

by KC Viking on Aug 13, 2009 12:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Here are my answers

accurate – that’s a toss-up. Rosenfels on touch passes, Jackson on bullets and downfield (when he can make the read)
not staring down receivers – Both can, but Rosenfels is more consistant.
looking off coverage – neither, Jackson is young and might learn this skill
checking down – both do this better than we’d like, but Jackson seems to make slightly better passes on checkdowns
quick quality decisions – close, but I’d go with Jackson. Jackson fails to see the best read more often, but Rosenfels throws more INTs.
minimal fumbles – I think Rosenfels gets this by a slim margin. Part of that comes from Jackson being more likely to scramble which has a higher fumble risk.

Extending plays/scrambling/improvising – Jackson by a long shot
Pocket Presense/not drifting in the pocket – Rosenfel by a long shot

I think that shows why this is a close compitition. Neither stands out as being significantly better. I’ve been routing for Jackson since I see much more upside potential.

by ChemErik on Aug 13, 2009 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

No offense amigo...

But it’s obvious you want Jackson from your answers.

Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com

Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!

by Manimal on Aug 13, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Haha yep

Noticed that too. Accuaracy is Rosenfels hands down. He has like a 63% career completion rating compared to Jackson’s 58%. Something tells me Rosenfels has the ability to look off coverage, or his career in the league would have ended a long time ago. Haha and there is no way Jackson is better at making “quick, quality decisions”. If that is the case then you guys are in trouble this coming year….

by packallday555 on Aug 13, 2009 6:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

We all have our biases

Maybe I’m a little skewed as we all are even if we don’t realize it, but both QB’s have their supporters. I honestly wouldn’t be upset if Rosenfels wins the job, in fact I just want someone to win. Worst thing would be for one of them to get the job because the other played poorly instead of one of them playing well.

by ChemErik on Aug 13, 2009 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

who to start

on your poll, i picked rosenfels – because i couldn’t find “none of the above”!

by kagey on Aug 12, 2009 11:57 PM CDT reply actions  

Making an opponent prepare for 2 QBs

…is usually stupid.

Opponents are expecting a QB to pass sometimes, to certain receivers certain s of the time, and to run certain plays. Those things are true regardless of which QB starts about 99 of the time (Schaub or Vick/Collins or Young/Gannon or Grbac would have been different enough, but still would not have required an extra day of preparation for either QB. It doesn’t take long to plan for more rushing plays if a backup starts or more scrambles or to prepare for an abbreviated and watered-down playbook after doing the normal amount of homework.

The more likely outcome is that players get agitated with the seemingly indecisive coaching staff while the QBs never have a chance to feel comfortable (which is always played up in the media even though I doubt that it’s much of a factor).

Way too much is made of this, in my humble opinion. It just seems paranoid and ego stroking on Chilly’s part to me.

by KC Viking on Aug 13, 2009 12:29 AM CDT reply actions  

Much Ado About Nothing...

Who cares. Both will play AND whoever doesn’t start, will start in game 2.

Regards,

I don't suffer from insanity...I relish every moment of it!

by the Dragon on Aug 13, 2009 7:08 AM CDT reply actions  

+1

But it provides some minor entertainment to wrangle, lol

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Aug 14, 2009 6:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe Childress...

already let the 2 QB’s know who the starter will be. Why should he have to tell the other team and the fans?

by VikingEric on Aug 13, 2009 9:12 AM CDT reply actions  

As long as.....

Chilly picks the one who deserves the job( Sage Rosenfels ), and the one that did better in training camp( Sage Rosenfels ) then I don’t care for the preseason games.

by AllDayMVP on Aug 13, 2009 11:02 AM CDT reply actions  

Been hearing that Jackson was better in camp actually.

by Frost on Aug 13, 2009 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Light a Fire Under Jackson - Start Sage

Jackson seems to do better when he’s got something to prove. He wanted to prove he could move the team at the end of the Denver game two seasons ago, and he wanted to prove he was the starter in the Cardinals game last season. Start Sage against the Colts. Light a fire under Jackson.

by aladdinwa on Aug 13, 2009 11:52 AM CDT reply actions  

If that's the only way Jackson can perform well I hope Rosenfels wins the spot

Maybe the next item for Jackson to prove is that he can win games when he doesn’t have some extra external motivation. I think you have a point, but why do we want to motivate Jackson’s performance in the preseason?

by ChemErik on Aug 13, 2009 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why would you not

want the opposing teams know who to prepare for when your QB is supposed to go out there and prove he can do it no matter what? Childress is a moronic douche bag. I would purposely name the starte because I want my guy to have all the angles thrown at him and see how he deals with it………..not make it easier on him when I am trying to measure his ability.

by jay574 on Aug 13, 2009 12:20 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

He is probably

still waiting to hear back from Andy Reid to see what he would do.

by jay574 on Aug 13, 2009 12:22 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

That is a good one. That also explains why we lost the playoff game.

by Bjorno on Aug 13, 2009 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

ha!

Reid: “yeah, you don’t want to start Frerotte. We’ve got a secondary that prevents deep passes.”
Childress: “but Jackson can’t handle a blitz!”
Reid: “oh, blitzing’s not in our gameplan.”

by peterplaysbass on Aug 13, 2009 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

If this is really an open competition at QB

Both players should get an opportunity to start in the preseason.

As a result of that, I’m thinking Sage should have a chance to start this first preseason game. Why would I say something like that, you ask?

First, we already have an idea what Tarvaris can do. We’ve been force fed his quarterbacking for the past two seasons and change by Chilly, so there’s already a known quantity there.

Second, it lets us see Sage in live action with the first team defense. There’s been talk about his performance and ability at camp, and this would give us a chance to see if it does or doesn’t translate to gametime situations.

Third, it shows us that this actually is an open competition. In the past, Childress has done very little to convince folks outside of the organization that whoever goes against Tarvaris actually had a shot of obtaining the starting quarterback spot… Instead, it has seemed more like an “open” “competition” with the winner being determined before it even starts.

I worry that the same thing is happening this year, that Childress has already concluded that Tarvaris will start, and this notion of a competition is merely lip service in an attempt to placate Sage. Bobby Wade hasn’t done anything to convince us otherwise.

Anyway, while both QBs should have a shot to start this preseason, I think Sage should be the guy for the first game. At least then, we’ll have the illusion that this might actually be a competition.

http://sports-boards.net | Top notch sports discussion!

by vikesully on Aug 13, 2009 12:43 PM CDT reply actions  

I've changed my mind

I think the first snap tonight should be to ….
Percy Harvin. Yeah, that’s right – start with the Loki formation on the first play. I think that would be far more interesting than picking either of our QB’s. Based on reports of performance from camp about QB performance, we might be using the Wildcat/Loki far more than we’d really like. I want to know if it can be effective.

by ChemErik on Aug 14, 2009 10:02 AM CDT reply actions  

Yeehaw!

Love it :)

But even for the pre-season, it’s not the sort of thing you see in the No-Fun League, which is why the Wildcat/Loki will be analyzed to death and no one will use it after this year, lol. Sometimes I think that the game has gotten to be too serious in the NFL, too much a business, and too conscious of it’s own ‘professional’ image.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Aug 14, 2009 6:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Biggun_small
1st New Vikes Stadium Image
Small
What got you hooked on the Daily Norseman?
Viking_flag_small
Viva Valhalla
Russian_arms_control_small
Comprehensive Minnesota Legislature Mock Draft
Kalilhgh_small
Jarius Wright: The next Santana Moss?

Recent FanPosts

Jg_small
UBV's Special. Where we laugh about our Beloved Purple and the NFC North.
Deathstarvikings_small
Was McNabb really the best QB on the roster in 2011?
Photo_10_small
Follow Me: @austinnarber
Deathstarvikings_small
Leslie Frazier: Under the Microscope
Capture_small
EDIT: Rankings of 32 Teams by Number of Visitors
Dragonscales_lg_small
Help an Out of State Viking Fan Plan His First (and Last) Trip to the Metrodome!
Small
Thank you letter to Rep. Dean Urdahl for voting for the Stadium
Small
More Unimportant Roster News
Avatar_small
NFL: The Clone Wars [Part 2]

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Minnesota-vikings-logo_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall