Blocking Aside, Favre Looks Good in Houston
Before I get to the positive aspects of this game, let's get this out of the way. I have no idea what possessed this coaching staff to keep Favre on the field and blocking when the offense is running the Wildcat. I cannot even fathom the reasoning behind doing so. There was no harm done the first time the Vikings ran the Wildcat -- but in the third quarter, Favre was split out wide and made an illegal block on Eugene Wilson with his throwing shoulder.
Are Chilly and Bevell kidding us? This guy is fragile when he's not throwing blocks on defensive backs. Again, I don't know what they could have possibly been thinking when having Favre blocking for the Wildcat, but that cannot happen again. Consider putting Jackson in the game -- he's a good fit for the Wildcat. This coaching staff took an absurd and unnecessary risk in this game, and obviously, there's no reason for Favre to be making blocks like that.
OK, moving beyond that single play in the third quarter, Favre's performance in Houston was hardly perfect and wasn't particularly memorable (aside from his block on Wilson). But he played well. After just over two quarters of play, he had completed 13 passes for 142 yards and a touchdown.
The offensive line was largely to blame when things went wrong for the passing game. Favre was often under pressure but he resisted the temptation to make ill-advised throws. Indeed, the old gunslinger only came close to getting a pass intercepted on one or two occasions during his playing time. But he was knocked around too much.
If you blinked during the second game of the preseason, you might have missed Percy Harvin's debut with the Vikings. However, he saw quite a bit more action this week, taking a reverse, returning two kickoffs, catching three passes from Favre, and debuting the Wildcat. Childress promised a Percy Harvin sampler coming into this game and he delivered. Harvin nearly broke the opening kickoff for a big gain (right before Adrian Peterson broke a 75-yard touchdown) and he slipped away from two defenders after making one of his three receptions.
Granted, Harvin came under a bit of criticism at some points during the game. He caught a ball on third down just inside the sticks, bringing up fourth down. It was a rookie mistake -- he just needs to be more aware of where the sticks are. Favre also targeted him with a nice throw when he was single-covered in the endzone. Harvin should have caught it but was inches short of making the grab. Another rookie mistake, and not a big deal.
As if anyone needed a reminder, Peterson gave everyone a refresher on why he's the best running back in the NFL -- and he didn't wait long to do so. And as if anyone needed a reminder, Chester Taylor gave everyone a refresher on why he's a tremendous pass-catching back. Speaking of Eugene Wilson, Taylor humiliated him with a nasty cut near the end of the first half -- and finished the play in the endzone for a 28-yard touchdown.
The sloppiness of the game was a major disappointment. Double-digit penalties for the Vikings in this one, and that's gotta drive Chilly absolutely nuts. Way too many unforced errors.
Things looked good on the defensive side. To be fair, the Texans pieced together a couple of good drives in the second quarter, with the most impressive lasting 11 plays and going for 71 yards. That's how you move the ball against this defense -- you piece together a bunch of short-gainers. Matt Schuab's completions on that drive went for nine yards, 11 yards, seven yards, 15 yards, and seven yards. He was extremely effective. But the Texans offense was shut down for the previous four drives, and the Vikings deserve credit for that.
The big story, though, is #4's performance in Houston. As was the case last week, he took too many hits. Houston put the pressure on, and although Favre avoided any big mistakes and made many smart decisions with the football, his protection simply must improve. He also threw one too many blocks. Don't let it happen again, Chilly.
139 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Its weird but...
Considering that Favre was dropping back to pass, I actually felt comfortable when he did so. I remember that all last year when T-Jack and Gus dropped back I held my breath and hoped that they wouldn’t screw up. I hope that this good play continues and he doesn’t fall back into his old ways of forcing the ball. Just optimistic I suppose :)
Yeah
Moreso with T-Jack than with Gus, but I know exactly what you mean. Nice to be able to breathe again :)
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Except that when Gus was pulled as our starter, having not played the first two games, he was tied for the NFL lead in interceptions with (um) Brett Favre.
by Anthony Carter on Sep 1, 2009 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions
i think
favre did exactly what we all wanted him to do. as far as my memory goes, most people around here wanted him to be a game manager, not a game changer, and i think that is exactly what he did. i personally don’t want him doing anything spectacular, i just want him back there to keep defenses honest, which he did in spades. i was definitely not a big fan of bringing favre here, and i still think it was a waste of ten mil, as rosenfels could do exactly what favre did this evening, but at least he didn’t throw any INTs or anything else monumentally stupid (except for the block, sweet tap dancing jesus)
Green Bay or the Windy City..... There but for the Grace of God go I.
You’re right, all anyone wanted was a ‘game manager’, and Favre definitely kept the D more honest. They weren’t always up crowding the line and the result is a more productive running game as well.
I think it will only get better once Berrian returns. We should have some better speed on the outside, stretching the field properly.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Sidney Rice also looked very good.
Rice looks stronger and has definitely worked hard on his route running this past offseason. He should have a great year with Favre pitching to him.
by VikingBillArlingtonVA on Sep 1, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Overall, I give him a B
Liked the decision making, made some plays, but I have to be honest—this wasn’t the expansion of the playbook I was hoping to see. I get the play-it-close-to-the-vest pre-season schemes, but what I saw Favre do was what I saw Jackson and Frerotte do last year—dink and dunk down the field, short passes to the TE, screens to the backs, and hardly anything to the WR’s. I liked a couple of wrinkles that they used in their version of the WIldcat, but overall…meh.
That said, Favre looked sharp. Decision making was sound, forced maybe one pass, and Percy dropped a beautiful TD ball. I think the playbook will expand when the regular season hits, and one thing I did like was that AP and Chester will have a lot more real estate to work with. On the TD run, Houston had a standard 7 man front, and the Vikings burned them. That is what Brett Favre does for the Vikings…he puts opposing defenses at a disadvantage.
Brett Favre is a Viking, and John Smoltz is a Cardinal. The Cubs and Packers still suck. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I'll take it
I’d happily watch this ‘unexpanded’ offense all season because he actually executed it. That little pass to Chester? Awesome. The pass to Shank? Awesome. These are the types of plays that seem to elude Tarvaris (and formerly Gus) all to frequently last year. The Vikes looked great on their screens and slants (even though receivers dropped a few of those slants). Our offense will be devastatingly effective and consistent if Favre keeps executing those plays like he did last night. To me, that’s what’s been missing from this offense. TJax has the arm and abilities—hopefully he can learn the decision making and timing this year.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
Uh where have you been.
i know Brett is a great improvement over Tjax but lets be for real. This is exactly what Gus and Tjax did last year, and so did Brad when he was here.
by midnightwonder on Sep 1, 2009 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions
Really?
If this is what they did last year, then why is Brett an improvement?
Perhaps it is a small difference, but football is a game of inches and fractions of a second. Last night I saw Favre make quick decisions on slants, screens, and other WC routes that worked because the defense didn’t have time to react. I then saw Tarvaris show some flashes of being able to do this but then double clutch and look lost a couple plays later as he gets gang-tackled. Unfortunately that lost look leading to a TJax scramble, sack, or ill-advised duck throw on the run happened far too many times last year. That’s the reality my friend. One sees and hits his checkdown receivers when they’re open, the other doesn’t. And I’m not the only one who sees this as well—Seifert, Judd and Chip, Sean Jenson, and others have all pointed it out as well.
And also, for what it’s worth, TJax especially had trouble on a per game basis matching the accuracy and yardage totals Favre put up last night in one half + a series. I think the difference is hitting those little dink and dunk routes I’ve just been describing.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
yep... YAC.
I believe the 'push off' cost us 'our' SuperBowl...
I believe you 'go for the win'... instead of 'taking a knee'...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 1, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions
What exactly did you expect?
Lots of exotic, complicated plays with a quarterback who’s only been here 12 days, his main receiver out, and the #2 receiver a rookie who’d played only a few snaps in real-game NFL conditions before last night? On top of that, in a preseason game? You really expected them to tip their hand on their playbook in those circumstances?
i don’t think we have much of a playbook to tip. this game wasn’t much different than our offense last year (except for the wildcat).
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 1, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions
there is no expansion to the offense
chili brings a boring conservative passing offense. we might see some excitment from the wildcat (i’m still not 100% sold that it will actually be used in the regular season) but other than that, this offense is a vanilla dink and dunk down the field offsense. defenses know it and will adjust accordingly just like last season.
On the TD run, Houston had a standard 7 man front, and the Vikings burned them. That is what Brett Favre does for the Vikings…he puts opposing defenses at a disadvantage.
huh?? i hope you were being sarcastic here. how did favre put the defense at a disadvantage on this play? 7 in the box instead of 8? we saw the same thing last year. defenses didn’t put 8 in the box on every single play.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 1, 2009 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions
What's wrong with boring?
There seems to be an implication that boring = no wins. Do you want excitement for excitement’s sake? I think we will be more entertained by the offense this year simply because more plays will be executed in the passing game. Maybe that is boring, but if it gets us wins and deep into the playoffs, I’ll take it anyday.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
where did i say it was boring? i was replying to this:
this wasn’t the expansion of the playbook I was hoping to see
by saying that this type of offense doesn’t really expand any more than what we saw last night.
…do people actually read these posts or just see a line they don’t like and react?
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 1, 2009 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions
where did i say it was boring?
meant to say where did i say boring was wrong.
hate being interrupted in the middle of a post. annoying job!
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 1, 2009 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions
OK, here's from an outspoken Favre critic.
I was not blown away by Favre’s play, but then what can you expect from a QB that has had only 2 weeks to work with his receivers. I thought his view of the field was SO much better than Jackson’s. On one play in particular, I saw him look to 3 receivers before finally throwing a complete pass to the fourth. This was all done in the matter of seconds. I then saw Jackson, on a very similar play call, look to one receiver for way too long. By the time he checked to the second, he was under pressure and threw an incomplete pass. Favre looks to be a definate upgrade to Jackson. A week ago I may not have admitted that. That being said, I still believe Sage could have taken us as far in the playoffs as Favre. But as long as we continue to improve, I will remain a Favre supporter.
I can’t believe I just said that!
"Skol pa fiskande"
I agree...
Why can’t people recognize that the move to BF is about being a professional QB? Sure, Brett Favre doesn’t have the body he used to, but he’s smarter than ever in his pre-snap reads, and has seen everything under the sun. He really seems to be coaching from the field, which is something we haven’t seen here in a long, long time… As long as he knows his limitations, he will be a terrific pickup for us. IMHO, some of the penalties on the line were due to them still getting used to Brett’s cadence as he barks out the count. This will hopefully get better, but no way can we let Cook anywhere near the field with BF under center…
A couple thoughts....
The offense looks explosive, but I didn’t see much downfield. I hope earlier commenters are correct that the downfield stuff will come, but I wonder. I also thought the front 7 was as stout as ever. Not seeing many 100 yard rushers against this defense. Oh, and I think Favre needs to have his jersey tailored – it was a bit loose, the white shoulder stripes sagged too low – nearly down to his biceps. I suppose its an old time look, and I suppose he doesnt need to look svelt to attract the chicks any more. So I can roll with it.
Jersey
Ya, I noticed that too. Looked really odd.
Also, how big of an impact on the downfield game is Berrian’s absence having?
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
Harvin & Berrian
I think it’s a huge difference. Harvin was expected to help stretch the field, but Harvin still has a lot to learn. On that missed TD pass that Favre ‘overthrew’ him, Harvin would have been if he hadn’t slowed slightly to look behind him after he beat his coverage. Rook mistake, but it kept Favre from being able to effectively stretch the field with the WRs. Berrian would have helped to stretch the opposing D too, but honestly, Berrian isn’t an elite speedster. He’s fast, but not top-5. Berrian’s strength seems to be his precision in route-running and his ability to read and take advantage of his coverage. I’ve noticed he’ll wait until his cover glances aside for just a second, then make his move to get into the clear. Hopefully Berrian will be in good shape for the season’s start, but a this point, to me he’s looking more fragile than T-Jack.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Favre and the Vikings........................
did not blow their wad on a preseason game.
It is not the regular season.
Be prepared to be wowed in the regular season!
Favre will lead the Vikings to a Victory in Super Bowl XLIV!
Guaranteed!
All I will say is.....
This is still only preseason, I’m waiting till regular season. And still, this is not blowing up my skirt Gentlemen (and Ladies). These numbers remind me alot of T.J. the few times he seemed in control of himself. Even then I still wasnt having my ex g/f giggle in the morning.
Sorry for the visual
"If you're gonna shoot, shoot, don't talk"
Other than Favre
I thought Sullivan played well for the most part. He gets pushed around a bit at times but he is progressing faster than I thought he would. Good to see Rice hang on to the ball after he got clocked after the catch. Jaymar J is doing decent at punt returns; too bad he hasn’t been able to get more active in the passing game because I want to see his run and catch ability…hopefully it’s like Percy’s!
Was thinking that myself
Give Sullivan most of this season, and we wont be missing Birk. And I do love Birk alot folks. In a totally heterosexual way of course, just like I did with Millard back in the day! Still remember wearing #75 playing for Centennial Jr./Sr. High back then till my back gave out.
"If you're gonna shoot, shoot, don't talk"
by VikesFaninNM on Aug 31, 2009 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions
ROT is still a problem.
Artis Hicks was in there and didn’t look good at all. Better hope Loadholt comes on strong early and wtf is up with all of those motion penalties and the like? Those are killers in the regular season.
by VikingBillArlingtonVA on Sep 1, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions
A rookie mistake ???????
This is the 3rd place I’ve heard this dumb comment. How is running a pass route short of the sticks a rookie mistake. You mean in college they teach them to run pass patterns on 3rd down short of the sticks? Or maybe in some college football it is first and 8 and the field is only 80 yards long? - BF looked better than OK. Not as good as I hoped and not as bad as I feared. -
it’s a rookie mistake because in college, harvin’s athletic ability against lessor talent would have allowed him to get the first down regardless of catching it behind the marker. the sheer difference in talent would have allowed him to make a play after the catch. that’s why we always hear how rookies have to adjust to the speed of the game.
the pros know and execute the proper angles and they are so much more athletic than the vast majority of college players. you can’t rely on sheer athleticism at the pro level.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 1, 2009 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions
I’ve seen some NFL vets pull that boneheaded move too, there’s no excuse for them; they should know better and be tracking their position, esp relative to the chains. The only time it’s forgivable is if they’re being used as a safety valve and the QB is dumping to avoid a sack.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
What was Chilly thinking?
That’s exactly right. You’ve got a 39-year-old qb with a torn rotator cuff, a reportedly cracked rib and your whole season, not to mention your job, riding on his health, and you line him up to throw blocks on younger, stronger, faster defenders in the third quarter of a preseason game two weeks before the season? What the heck are you thinking? That is someone who has fallen in love with their own plays that they draw up on the chalk board. When you put them on the field it becomes a bit more real. Real freakin’ scary! Chilly, c’mon man. There is no way that this makes sense. You got away with that one. Get rid of that play with Favre in it.
Joe O
Minnesota Vikings Examiner
Go Vikes!
if he can’t execute the plays and we have to coddle him on the field, he doesn’t need to be on the field.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 1, 2009 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions
And therein lies the problem with Favre
The hopes of an entire season is pretty much riding on a QB who is already partially injured. And by your explanation, the playbook now has to be limited artificially because of said QB.
No, the playbook doesn't have to be limited . . .
It just has to be intelligently used and I agree that having Farve block in the wildcat is not the best idea I’ve heard today. I predict you will not see Farve on the field in a WIldcat formation again this season, quite probably because the team won’t need gimmicks to win. All the pieces are in place, NO GIMMICKS ARE NECESSARY!!
by Drullin'OverDaCards on Sep 1, 2009 4:20 PM CDT up reply actions
Favre can't come out every time they run the wildcat
Part of the effectiveness of the Wildcat is that it creates match-up problems for the defense. The offense goes into a huddle like they always do, but they come out in a strange formation which throws off the defense. If the Vikings took Favre out and put Jackson in every time they ran the Wildcat, that would be extremely obvious and the defense could substitute as well and match up better. In order for the formation to be most effective, Favre has to be in there.
I personally commend Favre for throwing his body around out there and not shying away from contact. True warrior.
Sure, it was a gutsy play...
But there’s absolutely no way he lasts a complete 16-game season if we see more plays like that. A warrior perhaps, but a warrior who will be sidelined come January.
He's going to take a lot of hits in every game
just as he has for 17 years. The majority of those hits are going to come as he’s throwing the ball and has no way to defend himself and is probably in a position where he is going to be knocked haphazardly to the ground. He has survived those for years.
When he throws a block, he is at least more in control of the situation and his body. I know it’s scary to see him out there throwing a block, but any blocks he throws are going to be a small percentage of the other, more dangerous hits he takes during a game.
As vikesfaninchina (china!) said, they have to leave him in there for the wildcat to be effective. Personally I don’t see that much problem with it, though I hope they will coach him to just more get in the way than throw a hard block like that.
On a side note, we didn’t really get much out of the wildcat when we ran it, which is a little surprising since that had to be a near total surprise to the defense.
by Migrant lurker on Sep 1, 2009 7:07 AM CDT up reply actions
That was a....
….coward move. Even for an old man. Just think if someone would’ve done that to him. The announcers would’ve pulled a Joe Buck….that’s just despicable.
Dumb move
Not a coward move.
A coward move would’ve been to get out of the way and let Percy take the hit. It’s football. It’s a violent sport. This kind of thing happens many times every week, only this time it happened with Favre and so everyone in the world is talking about it. Nobody cares when it’s a seventh rounder on special teams throwing it because he’s trying to make the team.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
The guy...
…wasn’t even looking. Favre should’ve at least hit him above the waist.
Favre can't come out every time they run the wildcat
Actually he can when you have a QB that can do it. Chilli should b working on Tjax catching ability. From the wildcat you can still throw you know.
by midnightwonder on Sep 1, 2009 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions
If they switch QB's, then they have to allow the defense to substitute.
That’s why the “No-Huddle Offense” is so effective.
dont forget that our number one wide out
was not in the game. Favre is a gunslinger this we know, we also know berrian has blinding speed put those two together and Favre will fare better than he did tonight.
sugar + water + purple
Some help on blocking rule's please.
When did it become illegal for a player playing wide receiver to block a safety below the waist in the open field on a running play? 2 concern’s 1 Where is 87 and all the penalties on offense and special team’s.
See That
That is how a real QB lead a team. In the red zone all kinds of penalty he is still calm. He get the team to a manageable third down. As for tjoke instead of get of his arsss, and learn from Favre he sit there feeling depress. What a sad case for a grown man. With attitude like that he dose not deserve to be on the team. I hope Chilly trade the loser .
?
Of course TJack is going to be upset last night. He was told that he would play the third quarter, and that sage would play the 4th. Chilly understandably wanted to keep Favre in there to keep his flow going and get him ready for the season, but that obviously wasn’t what was discussed before the game. In turn, TJack played one series, making a couple of nice throws, and was sacked to end the drive because the third string receivers couldnt get open.
Like it or not, and I hope you do because you are a fan of the Vikings, TJack has progressed every year, and the guy looks a lot more comfortable and in touch with his skills back there. He wants to play, and he was essentially lied to by the coaching staff. Sage played the whole 4th as promised – people can get angry and disheartened, thats normal. And how can you learn from Favre sitting on your ass when Favre isn’t even in the game?
take, that
i’m not worried about tj. he’ll either stick it out with us (unlikely) or have a very successful and productive career elsewhere.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 1, 2009 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions
blocking
I did not see the game work…down with the man! Anyway of the stats that bother me the most is the four sacks given up! FOUR SACKS GIVEN UP! What was going on there? And we only had one, there must have been a lot of pressure though looking at the numbers.
Were the sacks linebackers and corners or poor blocking on the D line?
Thanks
by montana vikes fan on Sep 1, 2009 4:22 AM CDT reply actions
Reminded me of KC a bit
Sometimes LB’s were getting through, other times Favre had no where to throw. One sack came when Sage tripped on Sullivan’s foot and fell down.
Overall Houston brought a lot of pressure and our offensive line looked a little shaky in handling it. They’re going to have to iron that out by the regular season or Favre will get hurt back there. Having said that, though, I think it’s good experience for us to face this right now because everyone’s going to do it to us until we beat it. I’d rather that happen now than in the middle of the season (like what has happened in the past to us where around game 5 or 6 a team just blitzes and blitzes us and we drop 3 games trying to adjust).
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
The o-line played better late in the 2nd quarter, but must jell a little bit better. They will be better once the season starts and realize Favre will stay in the pocket, unlike run around T.Jack
The RBs must work on picking up the blitz better, but if Loadholt can hold up his man pass blocking than everything else is set.
Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!
It didn’t seem like any of the hits that Favre took last night were that hard, but I agree that he was hit too many times. Even though he shouldn’t have been on the field to through that block you have to give him props, he andJeff Garcia are probably the only QBs that I can think of that would be willing to throw that block.
Anyone else concerned with the short yardage pass defense?
Seems like our achilies heel. While our run defense continues to dominate, I’m still concerned we have not addressed the pass defense this off season. At the end of the first half with a less than a minute on the clock, the Texans moved down the field at will. We need to tighten up that short game Chilly.
"Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far." Theodore Roosevelt
part of that is i saw jared allen and pat williams (pat williams!!!) in coverage.
why? i’m all for trying to be creative, but pat williams in coverage? it’s bad enough when they pull allen off the line for this crap but phat pat too?? i find this trend disturbing and potentially dangerous.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 1, 2009 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions
I think it may have been caused by a healthy respect for the Shaub-Johnson connection. While the Texans got a few of those in, they weren’t able to put together a consistent deep-game threat all night. Not all of that was Viking brilliance, some of it was because Shaub just wasn’t very accurate past about 30 yards, overthrowing receivers that had our secondary beat.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Things I particularly liked on offense:
No happy feet. I never saw Favre dancing around or looking even mildly uncomfortable in the backfield. Even under pressure he looked under control.
Overcoming penalties. The one touchdown pass was on a series that was 1st and 25 at one point. On the series at the beginning of the 3rd quarter, from the shadows of our goalposts, the vikes committed FIVE penalties and still came really, really close to getting out of that. That 22 yard ‘drive’, by the way, consumed 7 and a half minutes off the clock.
The one touchdown pass to Taylor. Watch that play again – that was a beautifully executed checkoff under pressure. That’s one play I really don’t see our other QB’s executing. There were a couple of other screens and checkoffs that were perfect in their execution and timing. Those were the plays that made it look like they really had it all together.
The ‘free play’ – Favre saw the offside, knew he had a free play and took a shot down the field, which was reasonably close to a completion. That was one of only two times he really went downfield in the whole game, so I’m pretty sure that was not the design. That’s a veteran play.
On the other hand, my one big concern with this game (offensively) is that we completed nothing any distance downfield at all and the one really long pass he threw (other than the free play) was probably the most ill-advised pass he attempted. The west coast is ball control and a lot of dinks and dunks, but I would have liked to see us stretch the field once or twice; that would help a lot in opening up the defense.
Listen to Favre's Post-Game
He said he didn’t make a few throws for more yardage because they haven’t developed the timing and trust yet. The short passes are less receiver specific in terms of where and when to throw. This game was all we can really expect after less than two weeks. I’ll be looking for two things to be fixed in terms of Favre week 1:
1) Correct the procedure errors that caused penalties (50% Favre, 50% OL)
2) Favre to have the timing and trust with at least a couple receivers so he can take a couple shots down field.
I’m also concerned that our backups on the OL and defensive secondary struggled much more than the first two games. The starters need to stay healthy!
if...
there are still some players in that lockerroom that do not like, or respect favre, he surely changed some minds after throwing that block. he showed he has his teamates back. as he said in his postgame news conference, he saw that harvin was going to get clobbered by 3 defensive players, and he wasn’t going to let that happen. i only saw the replays of it, but it didn’t look as dangerous as people make it out to be.
i can’t wait for berrian to get on the field with favre!
Considering the DB Wilson
Wasn’t even looking at Favre, all Favre had to do was throw his left shoulder into the guy to knock him off his lane to Harvin. He threw his entire weight into the guys knees, when the guy wasn’t even looking at him. I don’t think we’d like it if a defensive player threw their entire weight into Favre’s knees when he wasn’t looking in the direction of defensive player, and taken off the field because of a knee injury.
Protecting his teammates? respect? come on that was a lazy block, for a guy considered to be gritty and tough.
by Timothy De Block on Sep 1, 2009 8:10 AM CDT up reply actions
I thought
the proper way to block is to get low. I’ve seen WRs and QBs basically get down on all fours to ‘trip’ block defenders for years. How is this different? It’s a violent sport. Doesn’t mean that I like that block, but it’s a violent sport. Is there no onus on a defender to be aware of the potential blockers around him? QBs have to stand there and take shots all game without defending themselves. I guarantee you that they take more unblocked shots at the knees than DBs do—just ask Tom Brady.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
you want your shoulders lower than the guy you’re blocking. this gives you control of the center of gravity. going for a guys knees (or anywhere below the waist for that matter) is dangerous. favre could have ended this guys career. yes qb’s have to take hits but that is why there are so many rules protecting qbs. it is a violent sport, accidents do happen, but subbing a guy and crackbacking him are two different things. one is not dangerous, the other isn’t.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 1, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Exactly what would you expect him to do?
Just set himself up as a pick and get wiped out by 3 defenders?! The block looked much more like an “oh crap” self-defense move than dirty play. Get over yourself dsludo.
One thing was for sure
Karl Paymah cannot cover Andre Johnson 1 on 1.
Also Favre was hit way too many times. In reg season I think we would run more in a game like this. Also, I was hoping to see some quick crosses, WR screens, and slants to attack the blitz and didn’t really happen. Other than some nice RB screens and one over the middle to Sid, I didn’t see anything to hurt teams for blitzing constantly.
Not many CB's
can cover Andre Johnson 1on 1
Son, when you participate in sporting events, it's not whether you win or lose: it's how drunk you get. ~Homer Simpson
by thewild_viking_twins on Sep 1, 2009 9:40 AM CDT up reply actions
Good but uncomfortable
Strangely enough, I enjoyed watching Favre play in purple. However, I have this churning in my gut every time he takes the snap. Is this going to be his last snap? Ever? They say ’He’s the toughest man in football’ … just like the Titanic wasn’t sinkable. It makes me nervous.
And yes, putting Favre in to block on that Wildcat formation is like the Titanic playing bumper-cars with icebergs. Something’s going to break.
Yes but
If Favre is like the Titanic, it’s the Titanic on its 210th voyage (I think that is how many consecutive games he has now if you count postseason). You can call Brett Favre many things, but I don’t think “maiden” would apply (as in “maiden voyage”)
Maybe Favre is the Lusitania?
Two minute drill
How Favre kept recovering from those dumb false start etc penalties at the end of the half was impressive. They kept pushing the Vikes further back but he stayed calm, did not get flustered, got the yardage back in chunks in order to get a manageable 3rd down, then adjusted well to the blitz on that play and dumped it off to Taylor for a sweet 28 yard score.
To all those who say Favre does not give us anything that we didn’t have already, I say look at that drive. If you keep giving me that line after you do, I don’t buy it. The man stayed calm in the face of setbacks, kept the rest of the team calm, did not make a stupid mistake under continuous & increasing pressure, and even managed to score. You really think that with TJack (or Gus?) we don’t come out with three points, or even none, in that situation?
It was like watching
Green Bay do the two minute drill all those years. I used to hate that—we’d be up on them, 2 minutes or so left, and sure enough Favre would just keep moving them down the field. I used to get so upset, sometimes shouting at the TV—the Vikes had to know this was coming, right? They’ve only seen Favre do it 20 or 30 times before. It hit me part way through that drive last night that he was doing it again, only for us this time.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
Unbelieveable
We still have some Vikings fans that want to say..TJack or Sage could have done that… I have hated Favre all his career, but no way they will be able to manage the offense like Favre can…Favre even looked AT his object WR, then away, then away, then back to target for completion of the pass..No way TJack does that…Gotta root for the TEAM….Peterson missed LB blitz up the middle that caused 1 sack, whick knock us out of possible FG range, SO NOONE IS PERFECT, but wait until timing is better and WRs get use to Favre, offense will open up, which opens up more room for Peterson…..As for the 1st play..there was 8 in box, not normal 7
+10 to Unbeleivable
I agree with WVV, I don’t see how any rational person, who actually watched the game, can say TJ or Sage could have done that. The checkdowns, the reads, the look to the outside then throwing back to the middle, the respect the defense gave the passing game with Farve on the field. The 30 yd td pass that Harvin didn’t catch was perfectly thrown to a place where only Harvin has a play on it. If Harvin catches it (which a receiver that wants to start in the NFL has to do), it would have made every highlight reel for the week and would have everyone talking about what a stellar performance Farve had, instead of talking about Farve only throwing the short passes. Mentally, playing Farve puts a general on the field; TJ and Sage aren’t even officers.
If you think TJ or Sage could have made that throw please reach between your legs, grab your neck, and pull your head out. I think the lack of oxygen you are experiencing may be causing you brain damage.
by Drullin'OverDaCards on Sep 1, 2009 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions
and yet didn’t tj have a perfect qb rating in the last exhibition game? you’re right though, no way tj or sage can play up to the level of mediocrity that favre put on display against houston.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 2, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Remind you
If Harvin actually sticks his arms out for that endzone loft Favre adds another completion, 30 yards, and a TD. Then we all get on his balls as the greatest QB ever. That was a purrrrdy pass to that corner of the endzone.
by Jepp The Viking on Sep 1, 2009 10:18 AM CDT reply actions
Yeah, but stats jocks don't pay attention to the actual play
They just look up the numbers the next day, and let those from their opinions for them.
For those that ACTUALLY WATCHED THE GAME, what we saw, besides that missed TD you describe, was a few other receptions nullified by penalties, some nice lookoffs by Favre to get his ultimate receiver open & some room to pile up YAC, some split-second adjustments to defensive pressure (particularly on that taylor TD play), and only one truly bad throw, which because it came on a “free play” due to offsides, was not actually really a bad decision at all.
You just said what I meant
without being too lazy to say it.
by Jepp The Viking on Sep 1, 2009 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions
Just remember
That can be said of any QB. If xxx had just timed his leap better, so and so gotten a hand under the ball, if the ball didn’t bounce out of yyy’s hands and into the defense for a pick 6. Unlike baseball, there are no stats nullified by an error of the WR.
That said, Harvin should’ve caught it.
Why doesn't one of those stats guys
Tell us what Farve’s Qb rating would have been if Harvin could catch. That was a perfect throw 30 yds down filed to a spot where only the receiver had a play on the ball and people are still saying Sage or TJ could have done that?!?!?!? Harvin couldn’t even look back at Farve he was so ashamed for letting it slip through his fingers. 30 more passing yards another completion and another td.
by Drullin'OverDaCards on Sep 1, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions
Harvin
Watching him last night kind of re-enforced my thoughts that he won’t make a great contribution to the offense this year as a WR. He needs to improve his route running, catching ability, and his awareness. He will do more in the wildcat, and when he has opportunities to run the ball.
by packallday555 on Sep 1, 2009 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions
I don't think so
His is just too raw still. He is an athlete, and at this point that’s all he is. He might catch a pass out of the backfield, and take it all the way, but it will be because of his athletic ability, not his ability as a WR.
I’ll take my chances having Harvin vs. Woodson, or Harvin vs. Harris any day of the week.
by packallday555 on Sep 1, 2009 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions
He's played 2 Preseason games
and his QB is new to the team as well.
I don’t expect him to duplicate R.Moss’s rookie year, but to say he won’t make a great contribution is a little premature. He doesn’t necessarily have to score TD’s to contribute. Catching the ball and moving the chains is important too.
Favre
did not put enough touch on it.
by bleedingpurplesince74 on Sep 2, 2009 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions
i agree packallday
harvin is good. i think he will be one hell of a player for us. but i’m not going to get ahead of myself. the guy is a rookie and he has a lot of work to do. he’ll make his mark on kick returns and gimmick plays. his actual contribution as a receiver will be limited.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 2, 2009 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions
If Madden 10 has taught me one thing...
It’s that Percy Harvin will be the Rookie of the Year. And Madden is NEVER wrong. EVER. They always are right, especially with their cover athletes. They always have fantastic seasons after being there. Right? AM I RIGHT?
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
if only. we’d have won 20 superbowls by now.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 2, 2009 12:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Exactly
During that play Harvin had his jersey grabbed by the defender and he slowed down a step as if expecting a pass interference call instead of staying with his route. The pass was perfect. It should have been caught.
sure sure. it was the defender. it was harvin. it was the wind. it was my grandmother in florida.
and if tj had throw that exact same pass with that exact same result, it would have been tj.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 2, 2009 11:58 AM CDT up reply actions
lol, exactly
If Jackson had thrown that ball, everybody would be saying “Jackson overthrew Harvin in the end zone”..lol.
Not Necessarily Defending Favre
I’m not everybody…regardless of who had thrown the pass, Harvin is a pro now and in the pros, if it hits your hands, you should catch it. Even if your grandmother had thrown it isee.
chilly is a fool
a great defense, great RB’s, new great Qb…same moronic coach…QB throwing dangerous blocks in meaningles game. Sage Rosenfels told to take a knee in last 2 minutes (to preserve the win!?) when he needs reps to learn and earn his place, when does this idiot lose his job….
you honestly think Chilly had ANYTHING to do with Favre throwing that block? That was a Favre decision that he made impulsively. He’s been blocking like that for many many years.
I think Chilly's foolishness
consisted of not telling Bevell to refrain from any wildcat plays until Favre was out of the game. Sometimes you don’t realize how hot the burner is until you touch it…
True, but what happens...
in the regular season. Just expect if Favre is in there he is going to throw blocks. We always loved it when he was a Packer, but as the years have gone on, his blocks have been more and more cheap as he just dives at players feet to get them out of the way. Its risky for him and really dangerous for the other guy.
kept the line honest huh?
How come Peterson only averaged 3.7 yds a carry outside of the 75 yard romp. Just having Favre back there won’t do anything until the guys start to catch the ball. Harvin needs to make that fade catch in the end zone for example.
But stats are just that, stats . . .
you can’t take out the long scamper and then say it wasn’t a good rushing game. AD breaks a long run almost every game. If you took out all AD longest runs from each game, of course his remaining yards per carry will drop significantly. What would the point of doing that be?
I agree about the HARVIN needing to catch that ball though.
by Drullin'OverDaCards on Sep 1, 2009 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Peterson's Stats
Adrian had 117 yards rushing on 11 carries. Take away the 75 yard TD run and it relates to 42 yards on 10 carries-a 4.2 yard average per carry. Not shabby at all for one half of play.
I agree
4.2 yds a carry still sounds great for any RB. I sure wish my Cards could have a guy do that consistently or even occasionally.
But I still don’t see what taking out a RB’s longest run of the game then recalcualting his YPC is supposed to prove or disprove.
AD looked great (gee, what a surprise). Farve looked very good (a suprise to some, but not me).
by Drullin'OverDaCards on Sep 1, 2009 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions
Agree
I was answering TrevorR’s post on Adrian averaging 3.7 yards per rush. It reminds me of a poster a few days ago who stated that AP was overrated because if you take away his long runs, his stats aren’t that impressive. Let’s see now…what other back was like that? Can you say Barry Sanders? Teams would stop him for negative yardage on a few plays then, BAM! Long TD run. I’ll take overrated backs like Adrian and Barry any day of the week.
WHAT????
let me get this straight, you ACTUALLY read a post where someone called ap OVERRATED? that is unbelievable. that pimple faced, no girlfriend getting, last in his class 17 year old should have his balls cut off! (or at least seek counseling)
by indianavikesfan on Sep 1, 2009 11:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Yep
Hard to believe…truth is stranger than fiction…I believe it was either a trolling Bears or Packers fan.
In regard to the Cardinals running attack,
I get obsessive looking at statistics sometimes and I reviewed the Cardinals regular season games during the playoffs last year, and I can categorically state, with no offense intended, that you guys truly, truly sucked at the run game last year.
There were games where the Cards ran so infrequently that a handoff was almost a trick play and you still didn’t get anything out of it. Makes the accomplishments of Warner, Fitzgerald and company all the more impressive.
by Migrant lurker on Sep 1, 2009 8:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Last in the league in Rushing yards per game last year
We can’t be any worse than that this year. 32nd out of 32.
by Drullin'OverDaCards on Sep 1, 2009 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions
and you guys still went to the superbowl. awesome job.
by indianavikesfan on Sep 1, 2009 11:11 PM CDT up reply actions
What a bunch of Kool-Aid drinkers
I saw maybe three plays by Favre that TJack might not have made, and about five that Favre’s lack of mobility turned into sacks or bad throws that TJack would have turned into positive plays. I was not at all impressed.
Favre lookes equal to Jackson after less than 2 weeks with the team
I think that means he’ll be an improvement with a little more time. I think he made about 3 play where Jackson would have ran outside the tackles and tossed the ball away, or thrown a 0- 2 yd checkdown. He also made about 6 plays in stride with perfect timing allowing the receiver to get good YAC, where Jackson would have made a completion but with few or no YAC. I think Jackson would have made up for those plays by getting free and hitting receivers against blitzes with down field play calls.
In a few weeks, Favre will have more comfort with the Viking receivers and doing the same things that so annoyed us when he was in Green Bay.
" about five that Favre’s lack of mobility turned into sacks or bad throws that TJack would have turned into positive plays."
That is one thing that Jackson could which helped you guys a lot. Your o-line is and has been suspect against the blitz, and Favre not being able to elude the rush will hurt a bit. On the flipside of that, Favre can make the throws and reads that Jackson has not been able too. I think the two will sort of cancel each other out, though Favre being able to make reads and throws is more important then not being able to elude the pass rush. Your o-line will probably give up many more sacks then last year.
by packallday555 on Sep 1, 2009 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Considering they gave up an ubelievably huge # last year
… that’s saying a lot.
No, I’m sorry, I say fewer. Favre’s ability to read teh D & pick up the blitzes & get rid of ball before being sacked, leads to FEWER sacks than last year, where Tarvaris sees it coming too late, makes a mad scramble and eludes it briefly, then goes down.
I agree Favre makes the reads, and gets it out WAY faster then Jackson. I think the reason he’ll get sacked is because your WRs don’t get seperation enough consistently. So either Favre will just take the sack, because he is not going elude it, or he will try and force a bad pass.
by packallday555 on Sep 1, 2009 6:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Hopefully, Berrian will provide some separation when he gets back from his latest injury… if he can stay healthy long enough to make an impact, that’d be great.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
in our first 2 preseason games, we had 0 sacks with favre throwing only 4 passes.
in our third preseason game favre was sacked 3 times 2 quarters and a series in the third.
say what you want about it being the preseason, and the quality of the defense, etc, but that stat says something. plug your ears if you’d like.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 2, 2009 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions
Lack of Oxygen = Brain Damage
Hawkeye Tech, Please see my post above for an explanation of what you need to do to allow more oxygen to get to your brain. This is a common condition for hawkeye fans.
BTW – GO Cyclones!!!!! :-) LOL.
by Drullin'OverDaCards on Sep 1, 2009 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Looked pretty good
AP looked good, and I found myself wanting to puke as he took one to the house on the FIRST play of the game haha. Can’t deny his talent though, the guy is amazing. I think Taylor is much more important then some people think. He is so good catching passes, and so good after the catch. He is so shifty, and whether he is running or catching a pass, it seems like he never loses yards on plays.
The defense looked really good, but Schaub in general looked pretty bad. Winfield looked great, coming off the edge and cracking Slaton a few times. M. Williams looked really good as well, as he came up and laid some wood on Slaton and Daniels. I thought the secondary looked pretty good, but whoever was responsible for Daniels wasn’t doing too great of a job. Houston did put together a nice TD drive, and had a good few plays to get in FG range.
I thought the offense looked good and bad. Favre looked pretty good, and the RBs looked great. I didn’t think the WR core looked to good though. It seemed that they didn’t get enough seperation on some plays, which caused Favre to hold on to the ball a little bit (which happened on the play when he was sacked by Williams). The o-line looked great run blocking but pass blocking was sort of a different story. The interior line was pretty suspect against the blitz, and McKinnie struggled against Williams, causing him to get two penalties. Shiancoe looked great. He was making catches in traffic, and was keeping his routes alive.
All in all, you guys looked pretty good. Berrian was out, and when he returns it will obviously help the WR core. The o-line is going to have to improve against the blitz, because Favre is no longer will to stand in there and take a hit. Favre is developing more and more of a chemistry with the offense, and in 2-3 weeks the offense should be better because of it.
thanks packallday!
first good, honest review i’ve read and i agree with all of it.
picking up the blitz was a big problem last year and so far this preseason it looks like it will probably be a big problem again this year.
by iseepurplepeople on Sep 2, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions
Brett Favre....He's still the best,and better than Brady & Manning..
I loved watching Brett get his TD last night….Well,the guy in the bar next to me kept slammin Brett verbally,so i slammed him in the mouth,good and hard (somewhere here in MadCity) there’s a guy with 3 teeth missing & a head throbbing headache…
Brett said it last night…“I retired from Green Bay too early”..Brett will play as long as he can take it…But before he decides to hang it up,
i hope he gives T.T. one big friggin headache & a hangover….
as for last night,Brett was fine….Can ya deal with that you skeptics???
I have my #4 Favre Vikings jersey & i wear it proudly folks…
And if any of u morons cant take seeing Brett in Purple,
i hope you drown in your own blood….
by brettfavre4ever on Sep 1, 2009 10:35 PM CDT reply actions
-1
bleh. time to get over it.
I believe the 'push off' cost us 'our' SuperBowl...
I believe you 'go for the win'... instead of 'taking a knee'...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 2, 2009 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions
No way, dude
Favre and Peyton might be equals at worst, but no way Favre is better than Brady.
Here! Here!
You make it to my neighborhood and I’ll buy you as many beers as you want.
My Favre jersey is on the way.
I believe the 'push off' cost us 'our' SuperBowl...
I believe you 'go for the win'... instead of 'taking a knee'...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 2, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions
Which Team?
Some unscruptulous vendors have already been his old Jerseys with pictures of the Vikings one. Read the fine print on the web sites carefully people.
by bleedingpurplesince74 on Sep 2, 2009 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Some unscruptulous vendors have already been selling his old Jerseys with pictures of the Vikings one
by bleedingpurplesince74 on Sep 2, 2009 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions

by 

















