Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Fighters React to Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

Three Good Questions with Dawgs by Nature

Dawgsbynature_mediumWith the first game of the year that actually matters now less than 24 hours away, I took a few minutes to swap some questions with Chris Pokorny, the head blogger at SBNation's outstanding Cleveland Browns' blog, Dawgs by Nature.  My responses to the questions that Chris sent my way can be found in this post right here, and here are the questions that I sent his direction that he was kind enough to answer for us.

1)  Eric Mangini has done his best this week to try to keep his starting quarterback a secret.  To the untrained eye, such as mine, this seems a little strange, since Brady Quinn and Derek Anderson don't strike me as being terribly different quarterbacks.  So, let's pretend that Terrell Owens doesn't know what he's talking about. . .huge stretch, I know. . .and that we still don't know who's starting at QB for Cleveland.  How does the Browns' offense differ when Brady Quinn is running it as opposed to when Derek Anderson is running it?

There are two ways to look at this situation. The first way is the way that I think most Vikings fans are looking at it -- neither quarterback has a reputation of being one of the league's top quarterbacks, so "who cares?"

The second way addresses your question, and the reason why Mangini has pulled this stunt in the first place. Derek Anderson's game is built purely on staying in the pocket and throwing ropes down the field, consistently in the 15-25 yard range. His throws are sometimes erratic, but on his better days it works out because a receiver like Braylon Edwards can jump in the air and grab a pass that was thrown behind him. Where Anderson fails is that he has absolutely no touch. Screen plays are thrown like a bullet. A simple pass to a running back over the middle will be thrown with such unnecessary velocity, often resulting in a tipped pass that a defender can intercept.

Quinn, on the other hand, relies on the short passing game. Off of playaction, he's not incapable of getting the ball down the field, but the fact that he doesn't do it as often as Anderson has created a reputation that it's not his strong point. With Quinn in the game, the Browns will dink and dunk a lot more but the passes will be accurate. If teams think they can just play the short routes all the time then, a deep pass can be mixed in. Quinn also has more mobility if a play breaks down. He still stays in the pocket more times than not though.

Due to the varying strengths and weaknesses of the quarterbacks, the playcalling in the preseason was much different for each player. When Anderson was in the game, there was a lot of shotgun and passes down the field. When Quinn was in the game, there was more playaction and a focus on shorter routes designed to gain yardage after the catch. It's not like it's impossible for the Vikings' defense to prepare for both players, but even if they had to put a tiny bit more (or less) preparation in this week per quarterback, it's at least something. Regardless, I think the media has made Mangini's decision more of an issue than it really is.

2)  The Browns' defense wasn't terribly good in 2008, finishing 26th in the NFL in yards allowed.  Despite that, the Browns felt that their first three draft picks would be best spent on the offensive side of the ball.  Do you feel that the Browns have made the necessary changes on the defensive side to make themselves a better team in 2009, and what are some of those changes?  Do you think last year's shortcomings were due to the personnel, or was it more of a schematic thing?

Heading into the draft, most Browns fans expected the team to take a linebacker with one of their first two picks. With that said, we did address the defense very early on in the draft. When we traded the fifth overall pick to the New York Jets, we acquired DE Kenyon Coleman and S Abram Elam. Both of them will be in the team's starting lineup this Sunday. Coleman seems like a slight upgrade, while Elam is a "let's hope it works out" type of player, since he doesn't have experience as a starter. The Browns did have three second-round picks, and we took a linebacker with the last one. However, he won't be expected to make too many contributions early on this season.

Our defensive shortcomings the past few years has stemmed from the same issues -- not being able to stop the run, and having zero pass rush. Last year, Shaun Rogers was the only good (he was great) player on our defensive line. DE Robaire Smith was also a solid player, and DE Corey Williams had high potential coming over from the Green Bay Packers. Smith suffered a season-ending injury in Week 1 though, and Williams failed to adjust to the 3-4 defense. This year, we have Smith back to go along with Rogers and Coleman. It's no where near an elite line, but it might be approaching the "average" category as opposed to "below average".

Our linebackers also have two new starters -- ILB Eric Barton and OLB David Bowens -- both of whom are coming over from the Jets as well. That makes four new starters on the Browns' defense, all from Mangini's Jets. Rob Ryan is our new defensive coordinator, and during the preseason, I saw more blitzes than Romeo Crennel ran in a whole season. Overall, our team has made the changes to get better defensively, but it's still very much a project.


3)  Do you think that the team has a different feel or has carried themselves differently this off-season with the coaching change from Romeo Crennel to Eric Mangini?

It really has been confusing. At first, we heard from the media that so many Jets players hated playing for Mangini. Then, during the offseason, we kept on seeing so many of last year's Jets -- S Abram Elam, LB Eric Barton, LB David Bowens, DE Kenyon Coleman, CB Hank Poteat, and QB Brett Ratliff -- join the Browns' roster. I guess he wasn't so bad to play for after all. There have been rumblings that Mangini has worked the players too hard in camp, but I say "thank goodness". The Browns were such a soft team with a lack of good tacklers the past few years under Crennel. In Mangini's first training camp session with the Browns, there was more contact than Crennel would have in an entire week of camp. Players have to run laps whenever they make a mistake too. I've seen some progression in the preseason too. Players aren't missing nearly as many tackles. The number of penalties -- both regular ones and the dumb ones -- are still a tad high, but afterwards Mangini is at least stressing the fact that more discipline in necessary. Crennel seemed way too lenient with the players in that respect.

CONCLUSION:  How do you see this Sunday's game going?

I don't think it's going to be a pretty first game for Brett Favre. Our defensive backs have a knack for intercepting passes, and based on the receivers I've seen our secondary face in the past, none of the Viking receivers should present a match-up problem. The bread and butter of the Vikings remains their running game though, and Adrian Peterson shouldn't have too many problems setting up Minnesota's offense for a couple of scores.

The gameplan should be the opposite for the Browns. None of our running backs should have an effective game on the ground, but they'll be important in the passing game. I give our passing game a lot more respect than Vikings receivers do. Jared Allen is a fantastic pass rusher, but if our new offensive coordinator hasn't designed our gameplan with his abilities in mind, I'll be very discouraged for how the rest of the season will go. The biggest issue for the Vikings could be our X-factor: Joshua Cribbs. If the Browns' defense can hold a few of Peterson's dominant drives to a short field goal, Cribbs is the type of player who can give the Browns a short field to work with on every possession. Even if we have to punt, that benefits the Browns in the field position game until hopefully something right goes our way. Regretfully, since the Vikings are the much better team defensively, I'll take the Vikings to win 24-17.

Big thanks to Chris for answering these questions for us.  We'll have more on tomorrow's game in the 21 hours and 45 minutes. . .not that I'm counting. . .between now and kickoff.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Read both sides...

Good stuff! Thanks for bringing this to us!

I believe the 'push off' cost us 'our' SuperBowl...
I believe you 'go for the win'... instead of 'taking a knee'...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 12, 2009 2:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Thanks Chris and Gonzo!

I like the Q&As to get the other team’s perspective.

I think our offense might have some trouble clicking with Sydney and rookies starting (BB either won’t play, or his hamstring will be an issue) at WR, and Favre not having many reps. Longwell has a good day.

23-13, VIkes!

by JasonAve6413 on Sep 12, 2009 2:49 PM CDT reply actions  

bah

yeah, I know Reynaud and Johnson aren’t rookies, but you know what I mean, folks.

by JasonAve6413 on Sep 12, 2009 2:50 PM CDT reply actions  

Historically, the Vikings play a little worse than their competition.

Especially when they’re favored to win…….I’m just sayin!

Go Vikes!

by chaosg on Sep 12, 2009 3:51 PM CDT reply actions  

inferiority complex or what?

Sorry, I’m one of those new Favrian Vikings fans (hold the boos down please), but it completely baffles me to see the Vikes fans worried about playing the freaking Browns. Buck up for pities sake…this should be a slam dunk, no?
   My main question is when the Vikes get ahead by 3 TD’s, will they pull Favre, or just let him GO DEEP.
   Yeah, I know, they’ll play BF real conservative(ly). Yeah, I’ve got it, AP is the man…just sayin’….if…..

by lorenzo4 on Sep 12, 2009 8:21 PM CDT reply actions  

Watch the games against the 0-16 Lions last year. You’ll understand why people aren’t anxious to start beating their chests and claiming victory.

by Frost on Sep 12, 2009 9:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Divisional games are always tougher than normal games, and the Lions were not as bad as their record showed.

No need to get worried about close divisional games, so long as they are close and we still got a higher score than them.

by Bjorno on Sep 13, 2009 1:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Because chaosg is right. The Vikings have a long-standing historical problem of playing to the competition, whether that’s up or down. In the very first year as an expansion team, the Vikings took a game each from the Bears and Packers, the reigning Monsters of the Midway, we’ve always been at our best when we’re underdogs. But the converse is true too…. I worry much more about the expected blowouts than I do about the middle of the road expectations.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Sep 13, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Minnesota vs Cleveland...

Minnesota Vikings. Great season last year but things will turn around. I see, with the schedule, a season that comes to 6-10 record. Minnesota is not that good. Their offense/defense/special teams is at most mediocre. Even with Brett Favre, their offensive situation has not improved. They do not have the play calling and the entire depth of the team to make it to the playoffs this year. With the considerably tougher schedule, and I see a 34-17 loss this Sunday, the Vikes have seen better days.

Adjutant General, Matty Fan Club
64 "Phinsider Fued" Points..!!
"What's the point of getting in a sword fight with a guy you can run away from?" - Chris Doleman

by Alpha6 on Sep 12, 2009 8:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Black is white. Peterson is mediocre. Williamses, Allen, Henderson, Winfield are mediocre. The sun will not rise on monday.

You’ll see. (and if I am wrong, don’t bother me next week cuz I won’t be around these parts, right Alpha?)

TiggerSr

by TiggerSr on Sep 12, 2009 9:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like it...! This is something like I would say...

Favre is not scary, but Jared on the d-line and Adrian as the r-back do. If Favre can do anything with your receivers it will be good… but that’s iffy IMO.

Special teams is mediocre…. I know…. the Phins are bad there too.

… and yes… we both will continue to pay taxes………… as long as we work.. lol

Adjutant General, Matty Fan Club
64 "Phinsider Fued" Points..!!
"What's the point of getting in a sword fight with a guy you can run away from?" - Chris Doleman

by Alpha6 on Sep 13, 2009 12:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting Alpha

If you replace “Minnesota Vikings” with “Miami Dolphins” your first 4 sentences sum up how your season should end up.

Noodle arm isn’t taking you anywhere. Your last regular season game will be your “superbowl” as the opposing team is resting their starters for the playoffs.

by dsludo on Sep 12, 2009 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

... you share the same opinion of even many of our fans/bloggers...

… but I wouldn’t throw too many bones this way, till you see what yours can do. Pretty soon Favre will walk up under center with his walker…

He also throws way to many interceptions for my comfort. On the other hand, he may not throw as much if handing it to Adrian all day long…

We’ll see how he does thru the season…

Adjutant General, Matty Fan Club
64 "Phinsider Fued" Points..!!
"What's the point of getting in a sword fight with a guy you can run away from?" - Chris Doleman

by Alpha6 on Sep 13, 2009 1:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Alpha, You've Got To Be Kidding...

You think the defense is “mediocre”? Sixth ranked in total yards, first against the run is average to you? Three Pro Bowlers on the defensive line alone? The Vikings have their best front seven they’ve had in fifteen years. And they’re getting back their best linebacker in E.J. Henderson.

Since when is Adrian Peterson and Chester Taylor “mediocre”? Top five running tandem last year. Oh, and Adrian won the rushing title. Pretty average, eh? Big upgrade at quarterback, wide receiver (Harvin). Oh, and special teams gets back its best player in Heath Farwell, not to mention the Vikings have stocked up on players that can contribute on special teams. How on earth can you claim the Vikings haven’t improved on offense or even claim mediocrity? They were above average in points scored last year with Gus Frerotte at the helm for eleven games. You think Favre isn’t an upgrade over him?

I won’t waste time with your schedule assesment, you either don’t follow the Vikings or are simply a crank (and a mediocre one at that).

by Purple And Gold Forever on Sep 13, 2009 12:32 AM CDT reply actions  

Of course I was kidding...

Your assessments are right on. However, your receivers and special teams could be better… and Favre will be a question until most of the season is played. And I hope your offensive line can block for him… otherwise they will make him 83 yrs old fast..!

I’ve learned more about football since joining SBNation than ever before… and no, I will never know the Vikings like you guys. But I’m learning…

And I hope Favre doesn’t get weak at the end of the season, like he did for the J J J J J J Jets.

Adjutant General, Matty Fan Club
64 "Phinsider Fued" Points..!!
"What's the point of getting in a sword fight with a guy you can run away from?" - Chris Doleman

by Alpha6 on Sep 13, 2009 1:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

That is one of the things that we worry about, we know Favre has a recent history of tailing off at the end of the year, right when he is needed most.

But the hopes are that Chilly is smart enough to limit the amount of times Favre has to drop back and pass, as well as the amount of times he takes a hit. Didn’t look like they were doing a good job the first playoff game, but I don’t expect the line to be sub-par. Granted, we have a rookie RT and a young center, but I think they are the right pieces to the puzzle.

Berrian looks like he is going to have issues with his hamstring this year, indicated by the signing of “speedster” Greg Lewis. So Rice, Harvin, Johnson and Reynaud are going to have to pick up the slack. To be honest, I think Reynaud is a legit receiver and will turn a lot of heads this year. Mostly because we have a quarterback that is more accurate than our last few were.

I think that it would be a good idea to sit him once we have clinched the playoffs, give him a few weeks to rest and hope for the best in the postseason.

by Bjorno on Sep 13, 2009 1:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

It is not going to be close

Vikings 31-3. The Minnesota D is too much and the Vikings O will have a field day. Great way to start the Favre era.

Joe O
Minnesota Vikings Examiner
Go Vikes!

by Joe O on Sep 13, 2009 2:40 AM CDT reply actions  

Nice win Vikings

Go Brett …no ints, no fumbles, a couple passes, a couple sacks and a great win. EXCELLENT

How's it taste THOMPSON YOU MORON

by 4 where-ever on Sep 14, 2009 10:41 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Deathstarvikings_small
2012 Draft Player Rankings: Top 10 UPDATE 1.0

Recent FanPosts

Small
Vincent Jackson?
Deathstarvikings_small
Siefert's All NFC North Team
Beardy_small
What luck... A potential FA LT that is actually good...
Small
Vikings 2012 Starting Offensive Linemen
Vikings3_small
Patriots after Spygate, 4-4 in playoffs 0-2 in SB
Snickers_small
What I'll Be Doing Today (Super Bowl)
Sophialoren_janemansfield1_small
Interesting RGIII interview with Sports Illustrated
Small
Good News Everyone
Biggun_small
Vote:Patriots or Giants
Small
Feeling Lucky?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Kira_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall