Vikings Explode in Second Half, Pull Away from Browns 34-20
At halftime of today's game, there weren't a lot of reasons to think that 2009 was going to be any different than 2008. Despite the presence of Brett Favre, the Vikings' passing game was limited to dinking and dunking down the field, Adrian Peterson was on the sidelines losing his lunch, and the punt coverage unit had given up another huge return for a touchdown to the highly dangerous Joshua Cribbs. A lot of folks had come into the 2009 season opener with a great deal of confidence, almost overlooking the Cleveland Browns, and it was starting to look as though the Vikings players and coaches may have done the same thing.
Then the second half started, and we got the first installment of Season Three of The Adrian Peterson Show.
The single best player in the National Football League spent his halftime getting an IV after dealing with dehydration. The weather in Cleveland was a bit warmer than anticipated, and the dehydration caused him to only gain one yard in the second quarter of play.and only 25 yards on 9 carries in the first half overall. However, he came back in the second half with a vengeance, and on 16 second half carries he gained 155 yards. His last carry was the most impressive, as he took a handoff and traveled left. As he got to the sidelines, he broke one tackle, and then hit Browns' cornerback Eric Wright with a pie-face that Moe Howard would have been proud of, sending Wright about three yards into the sidelines. After a very nice assist from Sidney Rice, Peterson soon found himself in the end zone celebrating a 64-yard touchdown run that pretty much iced the game for the Beloved Purple.
Honestly. . .#28 in purple is the single-best player in the National Football League, and you're going to have a hell of a time convincing me that it could possibly be anybody else.
So what else is there to say about today's game for the Vikings? We'll discuss it further after the jump.
The Vikings' defense was, quite frankly, suffocating this afternoon. While Jared Allen spent most of his afternoon being pretty well handled by Browns OT Joe Thomas, the rest of the front seven had Brady Quinn running for his life all day long. The Vikings' defense brought Quinn down five times, with Kevin Williams, Ray Edwards, E.J. Henderson, and Letroy Guion marking the stat sheet in that category (one sack was classified as a "team" sack). While the run defense was uncharacteristically soft, ultimately allowing 4.5 yards a carry to the Browns, the pass defense did a fine job. . .and don't worry about Jared Allen. He doesn't have to go against Joe Thomas every week.Cedric Griffin managed to notch an interception for the Vikings as well, as Brady Quinn hit him on a perfect fade route during the third quarter. The third quarter was the real turning point of today's game, as the Vikings held the ball for 12:25 of the quarter's 15 minutes of play.
Oh, what about that Favre fellow, you say? Well, he did what we want him to do. . .he completed a high percentage of passes (14/21 or 66.7%), he managed the game (zero turnovers), and he made plays when the Vikings needed him to. The two best examples of that came in that aforementioned third quarter. The first came on the Vikings' opening drive after halftime, Facing a 3rd and 10 from the Cleveland 33 and facing a heavy blitz, Favre hung in. . .and hung in. . .until the very last second, where he released on a tight end screen to Visanthe Shiancoe, who picked up 11 yards and kept the drive going. The drive ultimately concluded with Peterson's second TD run of the day and gave Minnesota a lead they'd never relinquish..
The other came on the Vikings' next drive, which came after the Cedric Griffin interception. After a sack gave the Vikings a 2nd and 18 from the Minnesota 21, Favre took a shotgun snap from John Sullivan, calmly stood in the pocket, and absolutely drilled a pass to Percy Harvin that turned into a 21-yard play and a first down for Minnesota. That drive concluded with Percy Harvin's first NFL touchdown, a six-yard pass from Favre to make the score 24-13. We'll explore Harvin's game further as the week progresses.
It wasn't all sunshine and lollipops for the Beloved Purple, unfortunately. The one sore thumb from today's game was the same one that stuck out for a better part of last year, and that was the special teams. It started out with a call I absolutely hated, as Ryan Longwell unleashed an awful onside kick on the opening kickoff that gave the Browns the ball at midfield. (Can you "unleash" an onside kick? I couldn't come up with a better word there.) If you have a defense like Minnesota's, just blast the ball deep and go for the field position. The Browns' offense didn't do much today before garbage time, and giving an offense like that a short field is a recipe for disaster.
The other special teams failure can be largely pinned on punter Chris Kluwe, and it came towards the end of the first half. Kluwe's punt towards the dangerous Josh Cribbs was a low line drive that Cribbs fielded, made one move to his left, and went basically untouched for 67 yards and a touchdown that put Cleveland ahead going into the locker room. Not every team has a return man as dangerous as Josh Cribbs, to be sure, but I said in the Game Thread prior to the game that Kluwe needed to work on getting more air under his punts to prevent this sort of thing from happening. Hopefully that play was more of a function of Cribbs being the NFL's most dangerous return man than it is of the Vikings' special teams relapsing from what they showed us last season.
All in all, it wasn't as smooth as most of us would have liked, I'm sure, but the VIkings went on the road and beat an opponent by 14 points. . .and it conceivably could have been 21, if not for the Vikings playing their second-string defense for most of the Browns' final drive. And we expected it. This is what the Vikings were supposed to do in this game. They've gotten themselves off on the right foot for 2009, and can start preparing next week for a divisional tussle against their divisional rivals from Detroit. Hopefully, with the rust having been shaken off, things will go more smoothly in Week 2 than they did in Week 1 and we won't have to sweat quite so much. Of course, we remember what happened in our two meetings with Detroit last year. . .and if you've forgotten, I'm sure we'll be reminded of it on a few occasions over the next seven days.
The Vikings are 1-0, ladies and gentlemen. Here's hoping that it's the start of something big.
0 recs |
66 comments
|
Comments
Sorry about the off topic...
but is anyone watching the Packers/Bears game. Two over-hyped qb’s sucking it up BIG TIME. I’m liking this…
But, Rodgers looked like the MVP in the preseason hahaha. I think we all knew that was bs.
by dsludo on Sep 13, 2009 8:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep...
But didn’t you know the Packers offense looked “scary good” in preseason? lol
I wonder what the analysts will be saying about their offense after this game…
I have to say, if I was a Bears or Packers fan, I’d be sorely disapointed with my teams offense at this point. Although it appears that Cutler seems to be pulling it together in the second half after a dreadful first half.
by EasternVike on Sep 13, 2009 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thought Rodgers did a good job
in the face of a tough defense. Made some good throws, didn’t make any mistakes, and drove the Pack to a last minute win.
Jay Cutler, however, sucked monkey balls. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Brett Favre is a Viking, and John Smoltz is a Cardinal. The Cubs and Packers still suck. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
by MilCardFan on Sep 13, 2009 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Lions went 4-0 in the preseason last year
Who cares about the preseason
Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!
by VikesPma on Sep 14, 2009 9:13 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
-1 degree in hell...
+10 on the post. nicely done
I believe the 'push off' cost us 'our' SuperBowl...
I believe you 'go for the win'... instead of 'taking a knee'...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 13, 2009 8:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
hello. i’m not a vikings fan, but i do plan on following them this season because of the rookie they drafted, percy harvin. i am not sure how familiar u guys are with him. as a gators fan, i was fortunate to watch him during his entire tenure at the university of florida. the guy has been the best player i have seen play for the gators over the last 15 years. this guy is a very special player; in spite of his size, he would be a great full-time running back—of course, u already have one. having him and peterson on the same field is almost unfair. good luck, should be an exciting season for the vikings. the way harvin runs reminds a bit of barry sanders.
by chaucer on Sep 13, 2009 9:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
He's better than Tebow?
"He didn’t call me or anything. It was an accident, but a lot of people would have called to see how someone is doing after they got hit in the head. Especially if they had to go on the DL." — Morneau on pitcher Ron Villone after an April 2005 beaning.
by Gonzo2 on Sep 13, 2009 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely
Tebow plays a more important position in QB than Harvin did but Percy was better at his position than Tebow is at his respective position.
Agreed. Harvin is a beast. He played excellent today. He’s a no nonsense ball carrier with quick cuts balance and speed up the field. His ball control was great. Dropped a quick screen which was lame but other than that he was great.
by Sand0 on Sep 13, 2009 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
but Percy was better at his position than Tebow is at his respective position.
the “percy position” was a unique animal at florida. even though UF had similar athletes (chris rainey, jeff demps), meyer changed the offense completely when percy missed games rather than try to replace him with one player. primary example = SEC championship game, when tebow operated a more traditional drop-back passing offense.
regardless, i call shenanigans on your percy/tebow assertion. no one in CFB has been better at his position than TT. i’d rather watch highlights of percy, but as a UF fan if i could have only kept one, it’s not even close. percy is one of the car’s wheels…tebow is the engine.
by Natty Bumppo on Sep 14, 2009 1:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tebow to be drafted by the Vikes next year?
28TDs to 2INTs last year for Tebow. Holly freakin’ crap!
Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!
by VikesPma on Sep 14, 2009 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's week one.
Let’s focus on that for at least a little while, eh?
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Sep 14, 2009 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Tebow is the bees knees
in college football. I Still need convincing that he will be an elite NFL QB
by NMVike on Sep 15, 2009 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, i believe so. without harvin, the gators wouldn’t have beaten the sooners in that title game. clearly, tebow is a beast himself, but as a huge fan, even i wonder how successfully an nfl qb he’ll be. harvin, on the other hand, i have no doubts will be a great player at this stage. give credit to the vikings for virtually stealing him in the draft.
by chaucer on Sep 14, 2009 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
right, but “better” needs to be split into college and pro. the gators offense doesn’t work without tebow…it successfully worked several times without percy. as a pro prospect, the draft intelligencia seems pretty decided that percy is/was a better pro prospect, and i can’t disagree.
by Natty Bumppo on Sep 18, 2009 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trust me
We’re as fired up as you about having Percy on the team. I can’t wait to see a wildcat formation with Peterson, Harvin and Taylor lined up in the backfield. As a defense man, I would just walk off the field and save the embarrassment! LOL
by stilpony on Sep 14, 2009 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Awesome win!
Special teams looks like it could be scary again this year, not as scary as Chilly’s opening onside kick call, but scary just the same.
AD is simply the best!!!
"Don't take life for granted, because tomorrow isn't promised to any one of us." -Kirby Puckett
"No, you don't understand It’s a metaphor for A SERIES SWEEP!!!!!!!" -natethejinx
by less cowbell, more 'neau on Sep 13, 2009 10:16 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
chilly
Hey Chilly, onside kick to open a season? I would say the same thing even if you recovered it – you are an idiot.
by briano29 on Sep 13, 2009 11:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Think of it this way
It was against the Browns. It probably wasn’t going to cost us anything if it went bad and in the end it didn’t. If it had worked it would have gotten the season off to a fast start.
Most importantly, it let Childress test it against a real NFL team in the regular season. If it had worked it would have given the Vikings something new to throw at teams in the future. Even with it not working teams will still have it in the back of their minds from now on that the Vikings tried it once and potentially could try it again.
In the end it ended up giving us long term benefit for slight short term cost.
by ckb on Sep 14, 2009 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good solid win
I have several thoughts on the game.
Even thought their play calling was the same type of stuff we’ve suffered through for years it definately worked today. The Vikings O scored 34 points without even having barely any “risky” plays like tight throws between defenders and over the middle stuff. They poured that all on with ultra conservative play calling and obviously mad rushing. This is scary. Brett is a master at the screens and little flips and that will really help them accomplish what they want.
I don’t see how teams can even bother with exotic blitzes and fancy stuff against us anymore because they will just end up confusing themselves as our guys are snapping off really quick developing plays and getting upfield in a hurry.
Peterson is the best player in the NFL. Sure, RB is not quite as important than QB in general but Peterson is so much better at his position than any other RB in the NFL and you just can’t say that about any other player at any other position.
The Vikings are going to break a lot of 20+ yard plays out of dinks, runs, and dunks. It is going to be fun to watch. They really have some game changers out there and Cleveland on many plays was a step from giving up long TD’s. That fake handoff fake end around swing pass to AP was a brilliantly designed call. He was out in the open with one defender to beat and got tackled by his shoe string.
Almost no penalties on the O today. If they can keep grinding out yards and not getting into long downs this offense will do wonderful things this year.
Give credit where it is due. We harp on them a lot but the coaching staff had a great game plan.
I liked the opening game kickoff call. You are going to throttle this team regardless so why not just have some fun with it.
by Sand0 on Sep 13, 2009 11:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
One of the news (Strip/PiPress) guys pointed this out
But welcome to the new 2009 Vikings offense. And it’s the same as the old offense. It’s predicated on Adrian Peterson being Adrian Peterson and the QB doing enough (like the little pass to Shank for a first) to keep things rolling. We still aren’t going to see many 250 yard passing days in this offense, but that’s alright as long as we win, right?
Anyone else notice how many drops receivers had yesterday? Favre could have easily had another 3-4 receptions if his guys had just held onto the ball or been on the same page with him. I am hopeful that a guy like Sidney Rice will ratchet up his route discipline and commitment to being the best WR he can be after looking at the game tape and seeing that Favre could make him a star.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Sep 14, 2009 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
receivers as a corps are never going to be perfect over a full game
no matter how good that corps is. every team absorbs 3-4 ‘drops’ a game. Favre did while completing 2/3 of his passes. Football is hard, but the vikings looked damn good at it yesterday.
Lurking since 2006
by boyonthedock on Sep 14, 2009 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with the opening kick
If nothing else, you’ve planted seeds in the minds of opposing head coaches. It’s not huge, but it’s something else to look at.
by Yotum on Sep 14, 2009 10:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the feel of this team.
You know that the offense will go through Peterson, and I think the veteran leadership or calming presence of Brett Favre really hasn’t been talked about today. This was a classic ‘play down to the level of competition’ game for Minnesota. Historically, they’re terrible outside on grass, and this had all the earmarks of a nail biter with one screwy play or turnover costing Minnesota the game late. At halftime, it seemed like you could see the game unfolding that way. But the Vikes came out and took their first two drives and shoved the ball right down the throat of the Browns, effectively ending the game. When you have a vet like Favre, who stays calm under early adversity, it allows the rest of the offense to take a deep breath, collect themselves, and go to work. Put in an exciteable or inexperienced guy, doubt creeps in, people start pressing, mistakes are made and then the game is lost.
Favre made a couple of clutch throws on both those drives on either third and long (Shiancoe for a first down) or second and long (Harvin on 2nd and long to set up third and short inside the 10) to keep drives alive and set up a touchdown. Peterson scores a touchdown four plays after the Shiancoe catch, Vikes take a 17-13 lead. Harvin scores the next play after his clutch catch, and then Peterson cuts the heart out of the Browns with his amazing 4th quarter run.
Would Jackson or Rosenfels have made those plays? I’ll let you decide.
Percy Harvin had an impressive debut. I liked his ability to catch a ball, sit down in a zone or find a seam. He has a nose for the end zone, and as the season progresses he will really begin to stretch the field.
Overall, great week one win. Skol!!
Brett Favre is a Viking, and John Smoltz is a Cardinal. The Cubs and Packers still suck. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
by MilCardFan on Sep 13, 2009 11:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Great post Gonzo
I only had a handful of complaints during the game 1 rice was robbed of a t.d. 2. our punter still keeps out kicking the coverage unit.3 the onside kick.
by Bako- on Sep 14, 2009 1:31 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Slow Start-Great Finish
The Vikes seemed out of sync in the first half but a different team emerged from the locker room after halftime. The team was operating with deadly precision as it marched down the field in the first two TD drives of the second half and we all got a glimpse of how potent they will be this season. Helluva catch by Rice even though he came down out of bounds. Good game management by Favre in the second half along with better protection by the line. What more can you say about AP? I’ve never seen a back in all my years run down the sideline, stiff arm a defender into the cheap seats, come to a complete stop, juke another defender, turn on the burners again, stiff arm another player and outrun two other Browns already running at full speed to the end zone. Gonzo is right. He’s the greatest player in the league. SKOL!
by purplegrey on Sep 14, 2009 3:05 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Opened Offense
Did anyone else notice how we went to three wides and 1 back a lot in the third. With AP in the backfield that its hard on a defense to defend. We have so many weapons on the field in that formation its scary.
GO VIKES!!!
by midnightwonder on Sep 14, 2009 6:44 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The only thing I would like to see is more timing between Rice & Favre. I think Rice is good enough to beat many DBs, especially on a jump ball/fade route but Favre underthrew the one that had the pass-interference call and the one to the right corner of the endzone the two were on different pages of the playbook.
by zebano on Sep 14, 2009 8:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
I think that is easily fixed.
Brett fired off a look (head tap) to Rice and he was supposed to run the fade but Rice (making excuses for Rice) ran the original call (a quick out) and "modified it " to a fade leading to the mis-timing. If Rice simply ran the fade without the “out” they would have been golden….
Believe me, Favre will let him hear it. Like Harvin said, he has learned more from Favre already than anybody he has played with in his 15 years of football. Rice can be a star and I believe Brett is going to be a big key to that.
by PurpleJesus on Sep 14, 2009 8:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I just said basically the same thing re: another comment earlier. Hadn’t read this far yet. Agree 100%.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Sep 14, 2009 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Vikings New Offense
First off Favre is all we could have hoped for. He is trully a master at the QB position, passing or not. I really liked his follow through after each hand off or pass. The defense can’t assume any longer. And watching the QB’s eyes wont help much when Favre is in there. Because his eyes are always moving from reciever to reciever, mix in a few fakes to the running backs and this is “indeed” going to be fun. "Thanks be to Mr. Favre for coming out of retirement “again”. lol
I knew he would help this team by example. And he is doing just that. Play to win, but have some fun doing it. By keeping the defense totally confused. Now then add into that Mr. Peterson punishing running, Percy’s speed and cuts, Mr. Taylor, Mr. Rice, and BB, and this may be a very very good year for our offense.
My concerns on offense remain “Blocking” or lack of, “Team effort” or lack of, and “Good Coaching” or lack of,.. Although the first sign of good coaching is the second half results. And our guys seem to shift gears at half time, for a good change. Which may have due to better second half coaching?
At any rate, “job well done”. But we still have not shut the Packer fans up. They are still mouthing -off about their defense, and QB in cheeze country. They just don’t get it.
The score board doesn’t lay. And Trash Talking doesn’t score many points.
by vnbushman on Sep 14, 2009 8:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
IV, blood loss, over 150 yds in the second half
I think the part of Peterson’s performance that gets looked over is his toughness. He said on his KFAN interview that he tossed his cookies before the game and was feeling ill. He gets and IV at halftime. The IV site get busted open on a tough short yardage TD run and he bleeds all over. He looks like he’s been in a bar fight, covered in blood and mud, and who knows what else. He’s tough through all of it and runs 155 yds in the second half. Toughest HB in football today.
by ChemErik on Sep 14, 2009 9:10 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Another thing to note
Not only is he tough, but he’s fast as hell! You don’t find too many backs that have both qualities.
by stilpony on Sep 14, 2009 9:31 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Once he realized he was bleeding, he only got more mad...
Nobody makes [Adrian] bleed his own blood…nobody!
by Yotum on Sep 14, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What a great game!
Aside from those things that you pointed out, Gonzo, here were a couple of things that I noticed that were a definite improvement over last year:
1) We actually came back in the second half to win. The Vikes have always been known for not being able to close a game, instead, we had our second string in against the Brown’s final offensive drive.
2) Notably stronger pass defense
3) Open field tackling was excellent compared to last year
4) I thought special teams looked great, aside from Cribbs taking back that low punt from Kluwe, I thought they smothered the ball pretty good.
5) We beat the Browns in the Dog House, not an easy place to play, and for sure, not an easy place to start out the season.
My one issue, and I never thought it would be, is that our offensive line had issues. It sure seemed like Favre was running for his life a lot.
by stilpony on Sep 14, 2009 9:29 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
happier than a pig in s***
i was in a very good mood yesterday and will be all week thanks to our team’s victory over the browns. the only thing that concerned me was the play of our right defensive end and our left offensive tackle. bryant was horrible on his pass blocking and on many of his run blocks he failed to finish his block. i don’t know what he graded out, but i don’t think it was great. i hope he can regain his old form or i fear brett could be on the ground allot.
asfar as allen goes i hope he can get some power behind his rush. Because he looked pathetic. Although it was against a very good, youg left tackle, it was still alarming he was handled with such ease. He and the rest of the front 4 are going to have to step it up because we cannot rely on secondary blitzes all year!!!
in closing, only being able to pick out a few things in the first game victory is an excellent way to start our year off. i hope this happy feeling stays with me for the most of this season. go vikes!!!
by norsemenxpress on Sep 14, 2009 10:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Remember Jared started slowly last year too
And not against LTs as good as Joe Thomas. It won’t be long before he starts pounding QBs into the dirt again.
by ckb on Sep 14, 2009 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
happier than Favre in front of a camera
Favre and the Vikings looked great yesterday. Favre and the Vikings rushed for 225, just awesome! I’m pretty pumped by Favre and the Viking’s run game. Special teams scares me again this year though. Favre and the Vikings need to get better protection for Favre. I look forward for Favre and the Vikings against the Lions next week. Skol Favre and the Vikings!
by Heech on Sep 14, 2009 10:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Just remember
That you’re a fan of the team, not the player.
It’ll help you cope with your hatred of Favre.
by Yotum on Sep 14, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
You’re right. I used that analogy going into the game. Then the team was renamed to “Favre and the Vikings” so that kinda blew that strategy out of the water. You have any other ideas?
by Heech on Sep 14, 2009 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have you thought of therapy?
Your deep seeded hatred of Favre coloring your desire to watch the Vikings and root for the Vikings really seems to imply some sort of male authority figure issue.
Freud would like to examine you, stat!
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Sep 14, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, yes I have.
Actually it comes from finding out that after all these years I’m the only Viking fan that said he hated Favre and really meant it. Kinda screws with my head a bit.
by Heech on Sep 14, 2009 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Favre helps get the Vikes a SB win you have to crack and get a #4 jersey. That is what it will take for me to buy one.
I never thought I’d see Favre in purple either and have talked my fair share of crap about him. However at the end of the day he is an upgrade from what the Vikes had. He gives Minny a better chance to win.
Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!
by VikesPma on Sep 15, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
the mailman has my Favre jersey...
I believe the 'push off' cost us 'our' SuperBowl...
I believe you 'go for the win'... instead of 'taking a knee'...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 15, 2009 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hated him as a Packer
But now he’s our QB. Doesn’t make me like the guy, but he’s our QB.
by Yotum on Sep 15, 2009 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are the reason
That I wish there was an “ignore user” feature to hide posts.
Because you always say the exact same thing. I already read your words a hundred times, no need to repost that same thing a thousand times more.
If it’s more important to you that you don’t hear about things you don’t like, than your team (ALL the players on it) play well, then maybe you should look into being a fan of an individual sport like tennis or bowling, and give up football.
by puddnhead on Sep 14, 2009 11:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know
That’s why I put in the avatar, to make me easy to spot and pass over.
by Heech on Sep 14, 2009 12:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
This is a team sport, Heech, go watch golf or swimming. Cheer on Micheal Phelps he needs some cheerleaders.
by midnightwonder on Sep 14, 2009 12:11 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
play action?
I don’t think I saw this a single time, but I could be wrong. Where the heck was the play action pass?
by dsludo on Sep 14, 2009 4:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully Favre's legs will get back to you next week(on PAP) with a response.
Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!
by VikesPma on Sep 15, 2009 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know, I'm re-thinking the onside kick
Like Gonzo, my kneejerk reaction was—-monumentally stupid, but thinking about it for over 24 hours, I like it.
Fact: The Browns would have a tough time driving 5 yards for a touchdown, much less 50. Yeah, they went 30 and got a FG, but when you have a good offense, 3 points shouldn’t be a big deal.
Fact: I have ripped Childress for overly conservative play calling for four years. This was anything but that. If the Vikes recover, they get momentum from the get go and probably end this game by halftime. Worst case, the defense defends a shorter field. He finally opens it up a little bit, and we crucify him. The guy can’t win with us, so I cut him some slack on this.
Fact: This was a low risk move that didn’t pay off. It was the first game of the year, against a very beatable opponent that had no bearing on the outcome of the game. It now gives opponents something to think about when they gameplan for the Vikes.
It’s not like he called for a fake punt inside his own 35 clinging to a two point lead with the game hanging in the balance.
Brett Favre is a Viking, and John Smoltz is a Cardinal. The Cubs and Packers still suck. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
by MilCardFan on Sep 14, 2009 4:51 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Also...
Regarding your 2nd point, it sends a message to your defense that your willing to put them on a short field and still have confidence they will stop them.
And +1 to your last line, haha.
by Yotum on Sep 14, 2009 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
Brett Favre is a Viking, and John Smoltz is a Cardinal. The Cubs and Packers still suck. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
by MilCardFan on Sep 15, 2009 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brett's goona have to quit full body tackling his teammates in celebration
A guy could get hurt that way. But it was pretty fun to watch.
May the wind be always at your back, and may your placekicker have icewater in his veins.
by juperee on Sep 14, 2009 8:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Vikings
Great Win. With Favre in there, I believed we could win no matter what type of defense we faced. Adrian Peterson is a beast, Percy is finesse, and Shiancoe is reliable. Now we need our speedster (Berrian) and our red zone threat (Rice) to get in sync and we should be running on all cylinders. Scary offense.
Our Defense played tired. This will definitely improve as we get into game shape. We cuddnt get much pressure with the front four, but I believe that they will get it together as the season progresses.
Our Special Teams was not so special, I hated the onside kick to start the game. AND that punt return for a td was a glitch.
Final score shud have been 34-10, Ill take a win either way. Skol Vikes!
by LAviking on Sep 14, 2009 11:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I have hope for what Favre can add for us too
But let’s be honest, we didn’t get much validation of that hope in week 1. Nothign to destroy it either. In short, jury’s still out.
by puddnhead on Sep 15, 2009 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Passing yards for Favre and friends
We all know what Adrian Peterson can do on the ground. With the Lions coming up, I wonder if the Vikings will open up the passing game a bit next week. Considering what Drew Brees did did in week 1 (admittedly, they are a passing team unlike the Vikings), I think it might be prudent for Brad Childress to let Favre and the Vikings receivers air it out. That is not to say that Peterson should be forgotten. I simply believe this is an opportunity for Favre and the Vikings to gain some valuable experience passing the ball.
I am a Packers fan, but it is nice to see Favre have fun again. Enjoy your victory, Vikings fans. At least we can both enjoy seeing the Bears struggle this year.
by starmark on Sep 15, 2009 5:39 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm of two minds about this.
It would be nice to see us get some experience in a real game with a more open passing game, but the first priority has to be winning games. As long as we can beat the Lions with dinks, dunks and the running game, then there is no sense in risking anything (and it would be a risk to open it up).
If we managed to open up a good sized lead, you would think we could ‘try out’ the passing game at that point, but that’s precisely the opposite of what good teams do with a lead — and it wouldn’t be a good test as the opponent would be expecting a run.
I did note that Childress said that Mangini’s defense was set up to keep everything underneath, so maybe if we see a different kind of D this week we’ll see a little more downfield.
And then there’s this: Just as it would be an advantage for us to have game experience with an expanded passing game, it would also be an advantage for future opponents to see it on game film. I still think that we won’t see it until we need it; we’ll probably need it some against SF in week 3. Not sure about next week.
by Migrant lurker on Sep 15, 2009 7:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah...
Mangini blitz on first and second down a lot to try and fill gaps. When Favre went to pass, he had guys in his face, plus the guys who didn’t blitz were playing back to avoid the deep ball.
On the first play of the game, if Peterson gets one more step, he’s past the seven or eight guys on the line and then only has three or four to beat, with receivers as blockers. It’s a risk. That’s why Peterson is a big boom or bust back – teams stack the line to stop him, so if he breaks through, he has fewer people to make miss.
Of course, a side effect is that the ball has to be passed quickly and accurately, something the Vikings haven’t had available to them recently. If the Browns’ defense was only giving the short pass, take the short pass. If they’re bringing seven guys on a blitz and playing man to man, take the deep ball. Just gotta take what the defense gives.
Favre did that. He took a few shots deep when it warranted (Sidney Rice) and got a pass interference call for it (which should be counted in both of their yards, in my opinion). Otherwise, he just played it safe, took the checkdowns, and the Vikings won big running the ball and making short, accurate throws. If you count the pass interference as a completion and take out a few of the drops (Jimmy K. and Harvin had a few egregious ones), Favre’s completion percentage would be 70-75%. You can’t ask for anything better than that.
I’ll take that win any day of the week.
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Sep 15, 2009 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Onside Kick
You are right, you don’t “unleash” an onside kick, you “dump” an onside kick. In this case it did look like the Vikes took a “dump” on that play.
Detroit and then SF (better D, but no offense to speak of) and so we should be 3 – 0 coming into the first big game of the season, against the Peckers.
Good teams beat the opponents they are “supposed” to beat. Over the next two games, not only will Favre have a chance to build chemistry, but we will see if the Vikes are a “good” team this year. I suspect they are but will have to prove it on Sundays.
by Rollosdad on Sep 15, 2009 9:42 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Run for the highlights
AP’s TD run was awesome in the 2nd half, but no one is mentioning the multiple blocks that Rice threw for him that let it happen. Just think Sidney deserves some credit.
by keomr on Sep 16, 2009 5:11 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
He got his credit on this blog elsewhere… I think in the vid of AP
I believe the 'push off' cost us 'our' SuperBowl...
I believe you 'go for the win'... instead of 'taking a knee'...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 16, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















