Can Anything Good Happen After (Week) 2 for the Vikings?
There's an old saying that states "Nothing good ever happens after 2." It means that if you're still out after 2:00 AM, you're probably going to cause and/or get into trouble. You may not be bothering anyone and simply trying to have a good time, but the potential for trouble seems to exponentially increase right around that ominous time of night. My younger brother often finds himself proving this theory.
Just look at the abundance of NFL players that make headlines for the wrong reasons--most of their mischief is committed after 2:00.
Or you can ask anyone with a DUI, public indecency, or horribly regrettable hookup on their record--nine times out of ten, the bad idea came after that menacing hour of 2:00 AM. (Especially that last example. Er, so I've heard.)
Unfortunately, I feel like Week 2 for the Vikings is their 2:00 AM. All the Vikes are trying to do is head into Detroit, hand the Lions their 19th consecutive loss, rack up another huge day for Purple Jesus & Friends, and get ready for the home opener next week against the 49ers. Just mind their own business and not start any trouble. But just like 2:00 AM, I have this weird feeling that trouble is going to find us on Week 2.
(Notice the shoddy column gimmick tie-in there?! Week 2 and 2:00 AM?? Totally the same digit! How am I not writing for ESPN or Deadspin yet with such genius writing skills?!)
Really though, think about it--can all that much good come out of Sunday's game for Minnesota? If the Vikings blow Detroit out, big whoop. That's what we're supposed to do to a team whose biggest accomplishment in the past 18 months was moving up to 31st in ESPN's power rankings. ("Thanks for sucking harder, Rams!") Or maybe the Vikings win but the Lions keep it close; the Vikings will be ridiculed for barely beating an awful team and letting an inferior squad hang around. Or what if the Lions actually w....wwwii...wwwwwwwwwiiiiiii.....
Sorry. I can't even type that phrase with a straight face. More analysis and my Week 2 picks after the jump.
Do I think the Lions will actually end their skid on Sunday? Of course not. I'm not dense like Peter King is. But I do feel like this is going to be one of those notoriously close, ugly games that these two teams have become known for the past couple of years.
Do I have statistical or analytical proof that would suggest such a game? Of course not. I just have a weird feeling. The Vikings are the superior team in nearly every aspect. Rookie Lions QB Matthew Stafford has promise, but he's making his only second career start while Brett Favre will steal Jim Marshall's record for consecutive starts on Sunday. (That's right, I said steal. Two hundred seventy consecutive games as a defensive lineman in the 1970's is infinitely more impressive than 271+ by a quarterback in today's age.) Minnesota has The Best Player In The NFL Period along with a nice bunch of other weapons on offense and defense. The Lions have Calvin Johnson and...um...quick, name three players on Detroit's defense! Don't feel bad, I couldn't do it either.
The only obvious threats to an easy Vikings victory are the Calvin Johnson/Cedric Griffin (mis)matchup and the fact that the Vikings allowed Joshua Cribbs the equivalent of pressing left and turbo in Madden for an entire punt return last week. But I have a weird feeling that the guy from "There's Something About Mary" throws his first pick in purple on Sunday and the Lions make it much too uncomfortable for our Beloved Purple.
Or I could be way off and AP will crash fantasy website servers with his stats while the defense punishes Stafford all day. That's fine too.
Prediction: Vikings 23, Lions 17.
The rest of my Week 2 picks (home team in CAPS):
FALCONS over Panthers: It was cute that Bill Simmons' article today made a quasi-convincing case that Jake Delhomme will be better after putting up back-to-back "police horse dumps" in his past two games. But if you think for a second that I'm going to back him on the road against a fiesty Atlanta team out to prove that 2008 wasn't a fluke, I will politely advise you to remove the needle and rubber tourniquet from your arm.
PACKERS over Bengals: Only the Bengals could lose in the heartbreaking fashion they lost to Denver last week. Good thing Cincinnati won't have to worry about losing on a last-second play this week, because they're going to get blown out. Although I really, really hope Ochocinco does a Lambeau Leap just to see how much beer and nacho cheese sauce he can collect on his jersey.
JAGUARS over Cardinals: Remember how awful Arizona was in East Coast games last year? And they're most likely worse this year.
Raiders over CHIEFS: Maybe an AFC Championship Game preview? No, you say? OK fine. I'm going with Oakland because they looked like the better "wow, they didn't lose by as much as I thought they would" team last week.
Patriots over JETS: Way too many people picking the Jets here as an upset pick. I think the Pats win a squeaker. Also, Rex Ryan looks like the kind of guy that lets out a lot of squeakers.
Saints over EAGLES: I give New Orleans the edge with Donovan McRib most likely out due to broken Nabbs. What, I don't think that came out right. Simply not enough time for Jeff Garssssssssssia to get re-acclimated to Philly.
TITANS over Texans: What will be emptier on Sunday night: Ford Field or the Texans' bandwagon?
REDSKINS over Rams: Last year, I made it to Week 6 in the Eliminator pool until the Rams got their first win of the season at Washington. It can't happen two years in a row, can it? DO NOT SCREW THIS UP FOR ME WASHINGTON!!
BILLS over Buccaneers: It truly amazes me that Buffalo just keeps finding new creative ways to lose games that they should have won. I bet whenever a Bills fan hears a Vikings fan complain about losing, the Bills fan utters in a barely-audible Clint Eastwood voice: "Pain? You don't know the first thing about pain, you sissified little pansy." But hey, cheer up Bills fans, I picked you to get your first win of 2009 on Sunday!
Seahawks over 49ERS: This should be a battle, but in the end I think Matt Hasselbeck will come out ahead. A big, shiny, bald head.
BEARS over Steelers: As Police Chief Grady says to Captain O'Hagan in Super Troopers, "Desperation is a stinky cologne." I think the Bears are just stinky enough to pull out a victory over the Polamalu-less champs.
BRONCOS over Browns: Kyle Orton vs. Brady Quinn! FEEL THE MEDIOCRITY!
Ravens over CHARGERS: Don't look now, the Ravens might actually have an offense. Giving up 24 points to the Chiefs last week makes me a bit wary of this pick, but I'm reassured by the fact that LaDanian already has his annual nagging injury. You know, the one that will suspiciously hamper him the rest of the year while people quietly whisper if the Chargers should just hand the reigns over to Darren Sproles because Tomlinson might be washed up. Sure LT, you're still in the same class as AP. Just keep telling yourself that.
COWBOYS over Giants: Sometimes it's a simple as home screen advantage.
Colts over DOLPHINS: The game will take place in the newly-named Land Shark Stadium, which of course gets its name from Jimmy Buffett's beer. Just like the beer, the Dolphins are rather overrated and just aren't that good.
Last week: 14-2
Season: 14-2
0 recs |
50 comments
|
Comments
BEARS over Steelers?
Desparation… true enough… But I’m going with the Steelers on this one.
Bears go 0-2 and the meltdown commences.
I believe the 'push off' cost us 'our' SuperBowl...
I believe you 'go for the win'... instead of 'taking a knee'...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 18, 2009 4:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Premature post-ulation.
As I was going to say…
I’d be totally OK with getting the Bears pick wrong and being 2 games up on Chicago.
by ericj69 on Sep 18, 2009 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was looking for insight from an NFC north rival for the Bears vs. Steelers game
Really? You really think the Bears will win on Sunday?
by Freddyd on Sep 18, 2009 4:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Polamalu being out gives them a chance
Chicago has a good defense, but will struggle on offense. I expect a low scoring game, but unless they unexpectedly win the turnover battle the Bears are going to lose.
by ChemErik on Sep 18, 2009 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What about Urlacher being out? What about those Bears receivers? What about those weak cornerbacks for the Bears?
Too many questions going against the Bears this week-end.
Only question mark i see is whether the Steelers O-line can give time to Big Ben. You don’t have the #1 defense in the league for the last 2 years just because of Polomalu. Remember who the defensive player of the year was last year? He’s healthy, and he’s gonna drive Cutler crazy.
If Cutler and those receivers had a hard time with the Packers adjusting to becoming a 3-4 what will they do against the kings of the 3-4?
by Freddyd on Sep 18, 2009 6:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just hard for me to believe...
that CHI pulls this one out. The Steelers D almost always find a way to bail out their mediocre offense which may be lead by Mewelde at RB this week. Steelers 24 Da’ Bears 20 in a squeaker.
John D. Henderson
by yukonthegreat on Sep 18, 2009 5:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If Favre throwing one pick is enough to make things dicey against the Lions
Then we’re not as good a team as we think we are. Seriously, one pick a game is kinda the norm for a game, that’s 16 picks/season. One pick is more likely than zero — it was last week that was unusual.
by puddnhead on Sep 18, 2009 5:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Especially since
the Vikings D should force the Lions into multiple turnovers
by ckb on Sep 18, 2009 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hoping your wrong but.
Brett does have a reputation for throwing the picks. I recently saw some stats of other great q.b’s who haven’t thrown half the passes Brett has and had a higher % rates of interceptions. seems like Brett’s come at the worst possible times though, and that’s what people remember. if he sticks to what every body’s been preaching, and simply manages the game, I believe things will work out just fine !
take a kid fishing, it's good for the soul. not only yours, but the child's as well !
by whanabarf on Sep 18, 2009 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The worst possible times always end up being at the end of a game when you are on a last-minute drive.
That is also the time that quarterbacks make throws that they normally would not.
Which also just happens to be when those interceptions happen.
I am not too worried about Favre throwing game-losing interceptions. I mean, it will likely happen at least once this year, but with AP in the backfield we should limit that kind of scenario.
by Bjorno on Sep 18, 2009 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The worst possible times always end up being at the end of a game when you are on a last-minute drive.
We here in Vikings-Land, call that the “Culpepper-Tavaris Syndrome.” ;)
by Wytefang on Sep 19, 2009 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously doubt the Cowboys finish within 10 poinst of the Giants.
New York is the class of the NFC, and Dallas gave up 174 rushing yards to the Bucs. How will Brandon Jacobs fare?
Viking Vigil - The 2nd greatest Vikings community on the internet!
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Twins Fix
http://www.twinsfix.com
by Andersklasen on Sep 18, 2009 5:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Vikings
are a different team than last year. The leadership on and off the field was scared of being successful. I believe the reason Minn. in the past played down too teams like the Lions was that they didn’t have some one at the qb spot who new about winning! This is why the Vikings pick Favre. Not that he was a better passer than the last 5 qbs there. Favre has that inner strength of knowing that he has nothing too prove in Detroit. Favre will have to watch it against the Pack, where he might be a little too pumped!
by Chuck forman on Sep 18, 2009 6:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This a very different
Brett Favre, he isn’t going to be a gunslinging QB like he was in past years. True that he will NEED to do that when we are playing better teams (PIT, NYG, etc..) and playing from behind, but until those games, 110 yards and only 21 attempts (whatever the stats were last week) is just fine with me.
JohnO
by yukonthegreat on Sep 18, 2009 6:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This article is good… except the part about starting at QB being easier than starting at DT. All people arent coming at u specificaly at DT, you arent getting pancaked, throwing thousands of passes year after year. Running an offense the whole team on your shoulders, how is that easy man??? How?? DT you charge forward , get to rest sometimes on defense maybe apart of 6 plays. At QB your apart of every offensive play, Favre plays all 4 Quarters in almost every game, playing with messed up fingers, cracked ribs, dead father, back spasms, leg injuries, give him his due writer, don’t make it sound like it was easy, thats just not right!!!!!!
by Favre 4ever on Sep 19, 2009 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Need to Blow the Lions Out!
I’m with your concerns this weekend, eric. Playing down to our opponents is the Viking curse, and I’d need to see a long streak of not doing that, to believe it’s been well and truly broken. The Vikes need to take the Lions seriously, if for no other reason than that it’s the only way for them to come out even. You’re right, winning proves nothing and a close game, or not, well, you know, just makes us look bad. Maybe that’s not such a terrible thing, could result in being underestimated for a few weeks, but really, self-respect doesn’t accord with it.
while Brett Favre will steal Jim Marshall’s record for consecutive starts on Sunday. (That’s right, I said steal. Two hundred seventy consecutive games as a defensive lineman in the 1970’s is infinitely more impressive than 271+ by a quarterback in today’s age.)
That’s a point I tried to make before but a lot of folks still think it’s a fair comparison. Personally, Favre would go a long way towards showing that he’s not a records-monger if he doesn’t start the game, and comes in for the second series. Knowing that Jim Marshall is a Viking icon, to do it deliberately would be one heck of a gesture of good faith and respect, and win over a lot of the hold-outs to appreciating him.
We need to put our boot-heels into the Lions and leave spur marks up and down their backs. Let’s root for the Vikes to do it!
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
by DCPurple on Sep 18, 2009 7:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Heartening
I find it heartening that the Vikes last week, after playing down to Cleveland’s level in the first half, came out and took care of business.
Lions have no chance except a fluke chance—a fumble and interception return for six, or Calvin Johnson having a career day, or if AD, um, well, you know, something bad, I won’t say it but I think y’all can figure out where I was going with that. I think this game is more important to the Vikings than the Lions, as it’s a game proving to themselves that they are as good as they think they are. Not that they’re going to blow them out, but I think we’ll see a pretty focused team this weekend—and one that’s not going to let up until the last whistle blows.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Sep 18, 2009 8:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
DC...
That indeed, would be a very cool nod to one of the greats.
I believe the 'push off' cost us 'our' SuperBowl...
I believe you 'go for the win'... instead of 'taking a knee'...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 18, 2009 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just can't see the Lions
starting a rookie qb beating the Vikings, that assclown Peter King notwithstanding.
by VikingBillArlingtonVA on Sep 19, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps
But we almost got beat by a QB who ran out of the back of his own endzone. We won that game by that 2 point safety. So yes, even a rookie QB can be cause for concern especially if the Vikes look ahead to week 3.
"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"
by VikesFaninNM on Sep 19, 2009 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dan Orlovsky made a poor decision
there but I stand by my statement. I think that near embarrassment will be on the Vikings mind tomorrow. We need to get some turnovers early and put the game away early.
by VikingBillArlingtonVA on Sep 19, 2009 2:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Lions are a team...
that our wonderful front four dominated last year, and I expect the same thing this time. The only difference is the QB behind center, and I don’t think he’s much of a scrambler like Culpepper (Who Jared Allen completely chased down and made a fool of).
If anything can be expected, it’s a quick collapse of Stafford’s o-line.
by gerkvoltage on Sep 18, 2009 8:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lions D
not too scary. Just hope chilly knows what’s coming…
Blitz blitz blitz and 8 man in the box.
by dsludo on Sep 18, 2009 9:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Vikings have to be careful
After escaping with two close wins, last year, I think the Vikings players will be on their guard. Which is a good thing, because I don’t have any confidence that their head coach will be.
by aladdinwa on Sep 18, 2009 9:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Whatch AD`s run again then
tell me if you really think the Lions have a chance!!!!! Give me a break….
by No_Fantasy_Baby on Sep 18, 2009 9:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Vikings seem...different
Each year is different in the NFL. The problem last year in the first game was turnovers. They moved the ball well but shot themselves in the foot repeatedly. Same for the game in Detroit. AP fumbled inside the Detroit 5 in the first quarter, Longwell had a FG blocked, and essentially the Vikes almost beat themselves.
This team doesn’t give off that vibe. This team gives off a confident ‘if we’re supposed to win by 10, we’ll win by 14. Then we’ll hit on your girlfriend, and you can’t do shit about it."
Well, except for Favre. He’ll be at Sears, trying to decide on that damn TV.
Brett Favre is a Viking, and John Smoltz is a Cardinal. The Cubs and Packers still suck. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
by MilCardFan on Sep 18, 2009 11:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It was just the Browns, you know....
I think we will get a very accurate read on this team after we see the Niners, Pack, and Ravens games, all home games for the Vikes. Vikes lose two of those games, and its time to pick up the transmitter and tell Houston we have a problem.
TiggerSr
by TiggerSr on Sep 18, 2009 11:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true enough,
but if the vikings are still playing in february , I for one will be keying up my microphone, and proclaiming to the whole world “houston control , the eagle has landed , repeat the eagle has landed” !!!!!!!
take a kid fishing, it's good for the soul. not only yours, but the child's as well !
by whanabarf on Sep 19, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I know, but
games like the Browns are games the Vikes almost always struggle with when they are the superior team. Maybe I am looking into it too much, but a convincing 14 point win on the road is something that they don’t do very often, and I was really encouraged by it.
Brett Favre is a Viking, and John Smoltz is a Cardinal. The Cubs and Packers still suck. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
by MilCardFan on Sep 19, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is no way Chicago will beat Pittsburgh. Look at Jay Cutler for example. He sucks.
Sucky QB+Amazing Defense=Amazing Defense Win
"He didn’t call me or anything. It was an accident, but a lot of people would have called to see how someone is doing after they got hit in the head. Especially if they had to go on the DL." — Morneau on pitcher Ron Villone after an April 2005 beaning.
by Gonzo2 on Sep 18, 2009 11:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Call me crazy, but I see Culpepper getting a chance to play on Sunday and lighting us up in revenge.
by Bjorno on Sep 18, 2009 11:57 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Good but....
Chiefs over the Raiders
While they did lose against Baltimore, they did rack up a team record 500+ yards against them. While not loaded with talent, neither is the Raiders. And I will give credit to the Raiders agianst the Chargers to an extent. Chargers should have had it sown up in by the end of the 1st Q. But something tells me might just be a change for the better in KC. Still not sure on Russell as a top QB.
Jets over the Patriots
I was impressed with Brady coming back and showing a bit of his old form on Monday Night. Tho I was a bit distracted by watching the game at Hooters here in Albuquerque ;-). The rest of the team I wasnt impressed with at all. Not even Moss who I am beginning to think at this point is a little over rated. The defense didnt throw me a bone and if the pundents were right, should have blown out Buffalo by the half. Yet, it took a greedy for yards idiotic fumble to hand the win to the Pats. The Jets, yes, might have a new coach and rookie QB, but same solid D and good supporting cast on the O that makes me believe the Jets just might be there at the end of the season and the Pats might be seeing the beginning of the end unless they do the youth movement soon.
Steelers over the Bears
Not sold on Cutler, glad the Vikes didnt go after him. While I dont think he will be as bad as he was this past weekend, still dont think he is coming out smelling like roses either. While the Steel Curtian is missing it’s heart in Palomalu (spelling?), they should be able to hold failry steedy and should force Cutler into several mistakes via forced plays. Also, the Bears have an aging D and now without it’s soul in Urlacher. Another D struggle, but by the end of the 3rd, we know the Steelers will be coming out on top of this one.
Giants over the Cowboys
The hockey style screen might be their only homefield advantage, but the Cowboys have a D that got peppered last week against a rather anemic Bucs O to the tune of 450 yards. The Bucs also out rushed the Cowboys 174 to 118. The Cowboys O looked good and not really missing Terror Owens, but will Romo have another decent week or erratic week? The Giants on the other hand didnt give up a passing TD till the game was decided with 1:30 left in the game. Gave up only 85 yards rushing and a total of 272 yards total. While Romo has had luck against the Giants in his career, I think this season that luck finally runs out.
"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"
by VikesFaninNM on Sep 18, 2009 11:59 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lions are never as easy as we first thought
I don’t know how they do it, but the Lions always seem to play our Vikes to the end. Doesn’t seem to matter who is favored, or the what the point spread is. The Lions seem to keep it close enough to win it with one or two fast TD’s. This Sunday wont be easy by any means.
But now we have a QB (Favre) that can play tricks of his own, on the Detroit “D”. So, if our defense plays all 4 quarters and not let up, I feel the Lions will be passing more than they like to. This gives our guys a chance for 1 or 2 interceptions, wit a run back or two.
Vikings need their passing attack to get on track. I’d like to see at least two long passes for TD’s. One to Rice, and one to BB. I also expect to see several screen passes for good yardage.
AD always draws a crowd, so some play action plays should also, get things moving for our Vikes.
The “overloaded box” wont work as well this year for the opponents defenses. The old man wont let that stop him or his new weapons from scoring. The Vikes will simply go over the top of it.
Vikes – 31
Lions – 17
.
by vnbushman on Sep 19, 2009 12:16 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lions are still an NFL team
Despite the Vikings being a better team on paper, a large part of every nfl game comes to chance. I wouldn’t count any game as a sure thing, even the Lions.
by LoveBoat1 on Sep 19, 2009 12:33 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm liking my Bears pick even more now
It’s an old gambling rule called “run to the smell.” If everyone is saying how one team stinks and has no chance, choose that team. Everyone thinks I’m crazy for picking the Bears…which means they’ll probably win.
(But if you guys ARE right and I am crazy for picking the Bears…well then all the better for the Vikings!)
by ericj69 on Sep 19, 2009 9:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why are some Vikings fans so paranoid?
eric and others, the final score won’t be close. The Vikings will destroy the Lions something to the tune of 35 – 13. Shake off your urge to see trouble around every corner and enjoy the ride.
Milcardfan and Chuck forman, I agree. AP is taking the Viking’s by storm. This is his team and the Vikings team personality is changing because of that. Adrian’s intensity and fierce competitiveness are rubbing off. I see it too.
by Belarus on Sep 19, 2009 9:27 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Because the Lions actually looked decent and had the Vikings in check for the most part in two games last season, when the Lions went 0-16. We beat them by a combined 6 points over two games. Thats why the on edge feeling
"That is the craziest sonofabitch I ever saw, how many more like him do you think are up there?"
by VikesFaninNM on Sep 19, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What happened last year doesn’t matter. Let go of your fear.
by Belarus on Sep 19, 2009 6:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
should've been 21
i worry the first half against the lions and special teams not really the browns really gots mashed by our first team it wasn’t until we brought in the 2nd team that they even got any points in the 2nd half
by clinton p on Sep 19, 2009 1:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Vikings 30 Lions 17
Favre 16-21 187yds 1 TD 1Int
TJack 4-11 61 yds
A.P. 147 all purpose yds
C.T. 85 all purpose yds
B. B. 73 yds rec
Rice 43 yds rec
Harvin 68 all purpose yds
Vincente 4-39yds
by bleedingpurplesince74 on Sep 19, 2009 3:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Lions fan here
I have to say I love hearing you comments on our site, and would have to say that AP can and could run all over us all day. But that being said AP hasn’t had the best games against us. my feeling is this game will be much close than you think and that if we do contain AP, Farve will have a much tougher game than you guys think… Closing words don’t get pants in front of the country… PS twins won that game because of the dome, tigers will squeeze by you to take the central… Good luck…………….
by msivits on Sep 19, 2009 6:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
All Day
AP hasn’t had the best games against the Lions? I guess by All Day’s standards he hasn’t had the best of games against the Lions. By anyone else’s standards he’s done a great job.
4 games played
3 games100+ yards rushing
398 total yards rushing
4.9 yds per rush
7 catches for 72 yards
2 TDs
The only time he didn’t run for over 100 yards on the Lions was the very first time he played them, which was the 2nd game of his pro career in 2007. This one won’t be close.
About your PS – lots of dome hits have cost the Twins games too. That’s why we can’t wait to play outdoors again starting next year. The odds are stacked against the Twins overtaking the Tigers, especially with their Slowey, Liriano, and Morneau on the DL. But this feels a lot like two years ago when the Tigers had their hearts broken on the last day of the season by none other than the MN Twins. It makes for a fun final week of the season no matter which team wins the division.
by Belarus on Sep 20, 2009 6:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
holding AP to 398 in 4 games and only 2 rushing TD is great
considering how good he is, I’d be expecting more from him, If we can hold him to a 100 yard and 1 TD it will be a bad day for you because it will mean the lions will be in the game to the end…
by msivits on Sep 20, 2009 9:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So...
Am I still crazy for picking the Bears?
by ericj69 on Sep 20, 2009 6:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
hell yeah!
The Steelers gave it to them.
I believe the 'push off' cost us 'our' SuperBowl...
I believe you 'go for the win'... instead of 'taking a knee'...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 20, 2009 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















