Daily Norseman: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Shattered: Wisconsin's home winning streak ends

Gonzo's Fearless 53-Man Roster Projection for the 2009 Minnesota Vikings, Part I

Will we be seeing this in Minnesota at any point in 2009?  We should know by this Saturday. (AP Photo/Dave Einsel)

More photos » Dave Einsel - AP

Will we be seeing this in Minnesota at any point in 2009? We should know by this Saturday. (AP Photo/Dave Einsel)

Well, folks, final cutdown day for the Beloved Purple, as well as the rest of the National Football League, is this Saturday, and the Vikings have a few interesting decisions to make.  What are they going to do with the quarterback situation?  Who's going to be the nickel back?  What about the offensive line backups?

Have no fear, for it's now the time to make those projections for the Vikings' roster for the 2009 season.  From 75 down to 53, here's what I think I would do if I were in charge.  And, heck, I'm going to give myself an easy one to get things started.

Special Teams

Starters Ryan Longwell (K), Chris Kluwe (P), Cullen Loeffler (LS)

Let's see. . .Longwell is the only kicker on the current roster, Kluwe is the only punter, and Loeffler is the only long-snapper.  Therefore, I'll go out on a limb and guess that they're all going to make the team.  Damn, this GM thing is easy!

Okay, with those three spots filled, the rest of the roster projection comes after the jump.

Star-divide

Quarterback

StarterBrett Favre
BackupsSage Rosenfels, John David Booty
Likely to be tradedTarvaris Jackson

There's an outside chance that the Vikings will keep four quarterbacks, but I really don't think that's going to happen.  Favre obviously didn't come here to hold a clipboard, and the Vikings didn't deal a fourth-round pick for Rosenfels and give him a contract extension to turn around and trade him five months later.  That leaves the third QB spot to be decided between Jackson and Booty.

The Vikings could attempt to slip Booty onto the practice squad. . .and it's been determined that he is eligible for the practice squad. . .but Minnesota may still have a bad taste in their mouths over the Tyler Thigpen situation and might not want to allow that to happen again.  Jackson, bolstered largely by his performance against Kansas City in the second game of the pre-season, has seen an increase in his potential trade value, and I can't shake the feeling that the Vikings will deal him to somewhere with a need at quarterback for a fifth-round choice.  Teams like Jacksonville, Buffalo, and San Francisco are teams that I would expect to be associated with a potential Tarvaris Jackson trade.

Running Back

Starters:  Adrian Peterson, Naufahu Tahi (FB)
BackupsChester Taylor, Albert Young
Practice Squad Candidate:  Ian Johnson
CutNehemiah Broughton

The most interesting battle here has been for the #3 spot between Young and Johnson.  While Johnson is the sentimental favorite in many eyes, the reason that the Vikings didn't draft a running back in 2009 is because the coaching staff likes Albert Young a lot.  To Young's credit, he has outperformed Johnson this pre-season, and I'm not sure that Johnson has made a significant enough impact on special teams to merit a roster spot at this point.  I'd love to see him spend a year on the practice squad, though.

As far as the fullbacks are concerned, Brad Childress has a really weird love affair with Tahi, and the versatility of a couple of players that will be mentioned later negates the need for another "pure" fullback.  Nehemiah's pink slip should be Broughten to him sometime on Saturday.

Wide Receiver

StartersBernard Berrian, Sidney Rice
BackupsPercy Harvin, Bobby Wade, Jaymar Johnson, Darius Reynaud
CutsNick Moore, Vinny Perretta, Bobby Williams

Yes, I have the feeling that the Vikings will be forced to keep six receivers this time around.  Contrary to a few years ago when the Vikings had basically zero talent at the WR position, now they have a decent little group.  The guy that's on the bubble here is Reynaud.  The Vikings appear to have given Percy Harvin the kick returner's job, and Jaymar Johnson is establishing himself as a decent punt return guy, so I'm not sure if they'll find a role for Reynaud or not.  Granted, the Vikings do have a couple of guys in Harvin and Rice that have a propensity for getting banged up, but is that enough of a reason to spend a sixth roster spot on a wide receiver?  I have a strange feeling that it will be.

Tight End

StarterVisanthe Shiancoe
BackupsJim Kleinsasser, Jeff Dugan
Practice Squad CandidateJake Nordin
CutGarrett Mills

Remember when we all thought that the Vikings "stole" Garrett Mills from the Patriots a few years back?  Well, yeah. . .that was before we knew that the guy couldn't stay healthy for five consecutive minutes.  He's been injured for the better part of this pre-season as well, and the time has probably come to just cut ties with him all together.

Nordin could be an intriguing practice squad candidate.  He's a local kid with pretty decent blocking ability and good size.  Plus, with the kind of offense the Vikings have run under Brad Childress, it probably wouldn't hurt them to have a spare TE stashed away somewhere.  As far as the mainstays, Shiancoe looks to have a big year in 2009, and the ability of both Kleinsasser and Dugan to line up at fullback as well as TE is the reason I mentioned earlier that the Vikings don't need to keep two fullbacks around.

Offensive Line

StartersBryant McKinnie, Steve Hutchinson, John Sullivan, Anthony Herrera, Phil Loadholt
BackupsArtis Hicks, Ryan Cook, Drew Radovich
Practice Squad CandidatesJon Cooper, Andy Kemp
CutsJuan Garcia, Brian Daniels, Chris Clark

Versatility is going to be the key to how this part of the roster is affected.  Artis Hicks played capably at a number of offensive line positions in 2008, and Ryan Cook can suck back-up at center, right guard, or right tackle.  We haven't heard a lot of noise about Drew Radovich this year after hearing quite a bit about him prior to his injury in 2008, but when you're an offensive lineman, that's generally a pretty good thing.  It's entirely possible that the Vikings will carry nine offensive linemen, too, but I'm not sure which of the guys I have getting cut is the most likely candidate to latch on if that becomes the case.

Cooper and Kemp strike me as good practice squad types for this year.  Kemp is a mauler out of Wisconsin that the Vikings grabbed as an undrafted free agent, and Cooper. . .the Big 12 Conference's offensive lineman of the year as a senior. . .is an undersized, finesse center that would appear to fit quite well into the Vikings' zone-blocking scheme.

So, with that, we've filled 27 spots on the 53-man roster.  That means the other 26 spots need to be filled with defenders, and that's exactly what we'll do in the second half of the preview.  Look for that sometime tomorrow.  Until then, enjoy the rest of your Wednesday, ladies and gentlemen!

0 recs  |  Comment 50 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Daily Norseman

Please Do NOT Vote for Jared Allen

Feb 2010 by Gonzo - 75 comments

Turning The Page

Jan 2010 by MilCardFan - 97 comments

Comments

Display:

I usually agree with you, Gonzo,

and I do for the most part here. There is only one thing I disagree with, and that is T-Jack leaving. I don’t think it’ll happen, Booty will be cut.

"He didn’t call me or anything. It was an accident, but a lot of people would have called to see how someone is doing after they got hit in the head. Especially if they had to go on the DL." — Morneau on pitcher Ron Villone after an April 2005 beaning.

by Gonzo2 on Sep 2, 2009 4:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

NO WAY!

When we drafted booty, the analyst at the draft said ‘He is the most ready to play Quarterback in the draft.’ After two years, I find it HIGHLY unlikely that Booty will be cut. If we cut him, a team like the Patriots will pick him up, develope and create another Matt Cassel. T-Jack will develope into a Leftwich… Sorry T-Jack but, It’s been one. Peace.

...add #4 to the mix and see what you get... Championship.

by Macdaddy4508 on Sep 2, 2009 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You mean Leftwich the starter in Tampa Bay?

Booty is not any good and hasn’t developed much at all. New England can have him for all I care.

We won’t carry 4 QB’s, might as well keep the best 3. And contrary to popular belief, that does not include Booty.

by Cobra312004 on Sep 2, 2009 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couldn't agree more...

I’d much rather see Booty go than Jackson. Little has gone into developing Booty compared to Jackson and I think if Jackson can overcome his problem of playing under pressure, he would excel at QB.

by EasternVike on Sep 2, 2009 11:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you kidding me?

Did you see his preseason games this year? He’s looking infinitely better than he did his rookie season. I’d say he’s developing quite a bit. And if push came to shove, I’d rather we trade away Jackson and get a low round pick or simply cut him. He was rushed into playing. Booty is at least being given time to learn the system and nuances of being an NFL QB. I say keep him and lets see what he can do later on. Jackson’s really only shown he can be occasionally brilliant and otherwise unspectacular or injured… or Both!

by Frost on Sep 3, 2009 8:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

agree completely

+5. If Jackson can be traded then we at least can get a draft pick. Is it enough compensation for the time the Vikings put into him? Probably not, but it’s better than nothing, which is would we get by cutting JDB. Remember that Jackson will probably want out after his contract expires so why not try to trade him?

by cutlassbob on Sep 3, 2009 1:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chiming in

Plus, Booty has virtually no trade value, while TJack would at least yield a low-round draft pick. Being a 3rd-stringer isn’t really conducive for a developing, young QB. Unless the Vikes win the SB this year, Favre will most likely be one and done, which would allow Booty to climb to a primary backup position.

"A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." -Sir Winston Churchill

by propheteer on Sep 3, 2009 11:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

tjack was ready to start in his second season out of alabama st. this is booty’s second season out of usc. is he ready to start?

by iseepurplepeople on Sep 4, 2009 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jackson was not ready to start in his second season, I don’t know where you go that from…

Maybe there was sarcasm there.

by Bjorno on Sep 4, 2009 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i know what you mean bjorno and it would have been better for him to sit and learn but he did go 8-4 with receievers like troy and ferguson. to me that says a lot.

if you’re going to throw a guy to the wolves, you’ve got to stick with it. i would have been fine with him starting 07 if he had also been the starter in 08 for the entire season.

by iseepurplepeople on Sep 4, 2009 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

His "sarcasm" button on the keyboard is broken.

Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com

Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!

by Manimal on Sep 4, 2009 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think there should be a lot of debate here.

Except, of course, at the QB position. I agree with you that TJ will probably be traded. I also like your reasoning for keeping Dugan at TE. He is definitely not around because of his pass catching abilities, but he has shown himself to be a pretty good lead and end blocker.

"Skol pa fiskande"

by NobleSavage on Sep 2, 2009 4:03 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Think QB will depend on offers for Jackson

I think Chilly has a draft position he’ll insist on to trade Jackson. If he gets what he wants, Booty is the #3. If not, he tries to sneak Booty to the PS. I’m guessing Chilly will be looking for a 4th rounder and won’t get it, but that’s just a guess.

by ChemErik on Sep 2, 2009 4:27 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

agree

that sounds like good reasoning to me also. there really is no need to panic with tj. if we don’t get a good pick for him, lets keep him.
on the other hand, if we can stockpile all the picks we can get for next year, maybe we can move up in the draft high enough to get a franchise qb.

by indianavikesfan on Sep 3, 2009 8:06 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

6 WR's?

Could be, but it depends on how many people are kept at positions on the “D” side of the ball. Is Wade on the bubble? Probably not.

Booty has no real future other than as a potential backup. T-Jack could be our QB next year after Favre re-retires. They should cut Booty.

Also, your roster is short in numbers on the O-line. I think 9 is a minimum and 10 a possibility. You have 8 on your roster. I think Cooper makes the roster. It’s a numbers game.

It sure is fun to play GM.

by Odin on Sep 2, 2009 4:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

They are kepping 8 on the O-line

I agree in keeping T-Jack and letting Booty go. I say we go with 6 WRs now that we have the talent and a QB that open up the playbook and get them the ball. Albert Young is a better blocker at picking up the blitz than Johnson, so he stays. Cooper could beat out Radovich because he can play C & G. Cook & Hicks can backup at T and that could send Radovich back to the practise squad.

by nmvikesfan on Sep 3, 2009 12:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

6-WR's or 4-QB's?

I think they would be fine with 5 WR’s, but B.Wade is in his last year with the Vikings. If the Vikings plan on restructuring Wades contract next year, then we don’t need 6 WR’s. If not, then they better keep 6.

If a QB has to go, I say release Booty. Jackson gives us a better shot than Booty.

by chaosg on Sep 2, 2009 5:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

At the risk of sounding crazy!!

I just can’t shake the feeling that between Chilly, Bevell and yes Farve they see magic in JDB.
 He is a gamer. By that I mean he is one of those who is able to somehow pull something out of his rear to get the job done. I think he showed that in college.
I believe some QB’s have the natural/physical skills but not the football smarts. JDB has football smarts and I think
Chilly knows it and is keeping his cards close to his chest.
Again, this is just a gut feeling but if it is correct then TJ is
on the blocks. Brett and Bevell work well together and Brett
may stay on after his playing time as a coach for JDB.

by kdog69 on Sep 2, 2009 5:49 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

another USC quarterback...another bust

i’m not sure if they see magic in JDB if they did he probably would have got more playing time in the preseason…I’m not saying booty is a bad qb but he hasn’t proved anything to us for us to think he’s better than the other 3 qb’s.

i’m saying try to throw him on the practice squad and if he gets picked up then oh well just let it go…

by vikesfan4lyf on Sep 2, 2009 6:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

maybe

he doesn’t want to showcase a guy he’s planning on putting on the practice squad and have someone scoop him up. just a thought.

Green Bay or the Windy City..... There but for the Grace of God go I.

by IABerserker1 on Sep 2, 2009 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

another bust?

Can you have a 5th round bust? lol, ‘oh shoot, our 5th round 3rd string QB isn’t ready to start after a season…’ almost zero logic to that?

...add #4 to the mix and see what you get... Championship.

by Macdaddy4508 on Sep 2, 2009 9:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fourth game will be interesting

I think the Vikes are more inclined than people may think to keep 4 QBs, with the primary reasoning being—what happens when you have two talented guys (in completely different ways) in TJax and Booty watching and learning from one of the best WC QBs to ever execute the offense? It’s enough to give me an extended pause about letting one of those guys go.

The fourth game will be extremely revealing—do Sage and TJax play a lot? Or does Booty get a half or more? If Booty doesn’t get much playing time, I’ll bet it’s because they’ll be trying to sneak him through waivers. If Tarvaris plays a lot, it’s because he’s being showcased.

"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."

by biggity2bit on Sep 2, 2009 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Favre having any desire whatsoever to stay on and coach, especially in the North … that is the bizarrest theory I have read on this board in a long time (well, next to a couple “grassy knoll scenarios” from ISPP). No way in heck he is gonna do that.

by puddnhead on Sep 2, 2009 10:50 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice Gonzo

I didn’t realize how oft injured Garett Mills has been. He can catch, but if he can’t stay healthy than forget it. Kliensasser can catch too and play fullback, gotta love burly Jim. Shiancoe is my backup TE in fantasy and may start a few games. If I didn’t have Tony G. than I would still feel comfortable starting Shank.

Bernard, Percy and AP oh my!

by VikesPma on Sep 2, 2009 6:00 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Fox Sports-NFL trades

John Czarnecki, Fox Sports, in an article today “NFL trades that need to happen before kickoff”, backs the idea that T-Jack will be traded. He has ten in the piece and #10 is QB Tavaris Jackson to Jaguars. He says that the Jags need a backup and Chilly should give his former second round pick another chance…plus his freedom from the Farve shadow.
What could be of greater interest is if Farve keeps throwing his aging body around like he did on Monday, it won’t be a matter of if but when he will get hurt.
Keeping 4 QB’s might not be normal but may be practical.
The trade wire and the cut lists are going to be something to watch in coming days.

by GonzoDad on Sep 2, 2009 6:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Um...

A problem with Czarnwcki’s idea of Tarvaris going to the Jags is that this would reunite him with Troy Williamson, in which case Jacksonville would have to assign someone for T-Jack’s suicide watch.

I suspect that at least a portion of Jackson’s jitters come from recurrent nightmares of seeing balls bouncing off miscellaneous parts of Troy’s anatomy.

by Elgar on Sep 4, 2009 12:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I say trade tj. He’s not gonna sign with us again after what he’s been through, this being his last year on his contract. He’s probably pretty pissed

by koooolaid1087 on Sep 2, 2009 8:06 PM CDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Mostly Agree

With a couple exceptions. The usual controversy over QB, I think the Vikings need to keep Tarvaris Jackson for a number of reasons;

1. He may not be a starter yet, but he’s shown improvement and there’s too much investment to just chuck him to the side, particularly when your #1 QB is a short-term solution.

2. Favre is coming off a rotator cuff injury and surgery, and let’s face it, his arm could go south at any time, leaving you with Sage and…. who?

3. Tarvaris is the only one of the 4 QBs who’s truly suitable to run a wildcat scheme.

4. JDB isn’t ready for prime time. Not even remotely. There’s a good chance he’d survive going to the practice squad, and if he doesn’t…. so be it. The man’s no Matt Stafford.

NFL.com ran an interesting article on the QB depth that each team has, and why it’s so critical in today’s league that a team is ready down to the third degree. Because of T-Jack, the Vikings ranked #7th in the NFL. Take T-Jack away, and the Vikings would probably drop significantly at the prospect of JDB taking a snap.

To me, all of this adds up to trying to retain T-Jack, perhaps with a contract extension.

I keep thinking back to when the Vikings let go of Rich Gannon and Brad Johnson (the first time around), when a little more patience would have netted a huge benefit. I hope they aren’t that short-sighted this time around.

The other one I take issue with is Ian Johnson. He’s too high-profile to survive a move to the practice squad, my solution is to put Dugan on the squad instead and keep Johnson for at least a year to see how he grows into the big boy cleats. Dugan’s not bad, but he’s not going to create a stampede of teams fighting to snap him up.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Sep 2, 2009 10:06 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Does Dugan qualify for Practice Squad??

He’s kind of the Sasser heir-apparent, isn’t he?

by ctowner35 on Sep 3, 2009 10:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Colt Anderson

Make sure you don’t forget to put Colt Anderson in there for Safety.

by BigSkyViking on Sep 2, 2009 11:17 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Hard to argue to what Gonzo is throwing down. Personally though, I don’t see why Dugan can’t be easily replaced by someone with upside. He has been in the league for 6 years now and has never come close to cracking the starting line up and everything he has to offer as a blocker and receiver can be matched by other players on the roster. I would rather see his spot go to Nordin who has similar size and way more potential, or to free some room for that 4th QB or 6th WR/CB.
His job as a blocker is easily filled by Tahi (they are paying him enough) and Kleinsasser, or (crazy idea coming) putting Taylor in the backfield instead of a FB on certain plays. He has little to no value as a receiver (17 catches for 109 yards and 1 TD for a career) and isn’t a special teams maven like Farwell (Dugan has 9 career tackles: 7 solo, 2 assist). My main point in this, is that he appears to be someone who has reached his potential and holds a coveted spot on a very talented team.

by vikingfuture8816 on Sep 3, 2009 12:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

T-Jack Next Season

The “keep Tarvaris/cut Booty” posts generally ignore the fact that Tarvaris Jackson is a free agent after this season, and as others have pointed out, it is unlikely he will be back in Viking purple next year.

Jackson’s impending free agency is the one reason I agree with those who say it is Jackson via trade, not Booty via cut, who will be gone very soon.

by Midnight Rambler on Sep 3, 2009 5:07 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Restricted free agent

meaning to keep him, all the Vikings must do is match the other team’s offer. T-Jack cannot decide to leave on his own.

by Elgar on Sep 4, 2009 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and...

he would not even become a restricted free agent unless the CBA is reworked this year. Because the NFL has already opted out of the CBA, unless a new agreement is negotiated, in 2010 players will need six years of playing to become an RFA, thus Tarvaris would not qualify, even as an RFA.

by Elgar on Sep 4, 2009 12:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What I don't understand...

Is how everything thinks the Vikings MUST have TWO capable backups that can come in and play extraordinarily well. Almost every other team in the league has a starter, a capable backup, and a “project” third stringer. The Vikings are absolutely no different. Sure, if they keep Taravaris, that’s great; three QBs who are very capable. But if they keep Booty, it’s no different than any other organization.

Favre is the starter, Sage is the backup, and Booty is the project.

It’s no different than last year, where Gus was the starter, Tarvaris the backup, and Booty the project.

It’s no different than Tampa Bay, where Leftwich is the starter, McCown is the backup, and Freeman the project.

Why are the Minnesota Vikings any different? Because Brett Favre, who has never missed a game, is 40 and coming off surgery? If there’s one thing that the NFL has taught us, specifically Bernard Pollard and Tom Brady, it’s that anything can happen to anyone on any given play. It’s a crap shoot.

So personally, I don’t care who is kept. We will have Favre and a capable backup either way. I prefer Sage over Tarvaris, but I like Tarvaris’ experience over Booty’s lack thereof. However, I’m a big proponent of keeping a third string project QB. So it’s a coin flip. I just don’t care either way.

Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com

Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!

by Manimal on Sep 3, 2009 8:03 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

the big difference is most other teams have starting qbs that are more than just a bandaid. will favre be our starter next year? probably not (although you never know). if not then we have? sage and booty and maybe someone we can scrounge in free agency or hope we hit on a draft pick?

one thing to keep in mind here is that unless there are significant strides made on a new cba (negotiations haven’t even started yet) then next year is an uncapped year. i don’t see the vikings out bidding many teams for quality free agents in an uncapped market. because of that, i also don’t see us trading away a bunch of picks to move up for what we hope would be franchise rookie qb.

not keeping 4 could really haunt us next year.

by iseepurplepeople on Sep 4, 2009 11:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like Tjack as a third string project…

Considering both Booty and Tjack are getting paid relatively similar salaries, and Tjack is better than Booty, I think the argument for keeping Jackson is a valid one.

by Bjorno on Sep 4, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Will anyone admit to the fear of...

Jackson leaving and becoming a star somewhere? My natural Minnesota pessimism leans that way, but my head says get what you can for Jackson, and move on. We have wasted enough time and energy hoping he’d be another incarnation of Culpepper (the early years, of course) and if we can get a 5th rounder out of it, great.

But I have to believe alot of the posts wanting to keep TJack have something to do with the fear that he will finally figure it out somewhere else and we’ll have egg in our face.

by San Diego Viking on Sep 3, 2009 9:11 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Usually the same People

Who thought Favre for 25 mil ensures Super Bowl, so take it with a ton of salt.

by bleedingpurplesince74 on Sep 3, 2009 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

bob lee
steve dils
steve bono
rich gannon
brad johnson
daunte culpepper
tyler thigpen
shaun hill

all were vikings qb’s who went on to be productive starters for other teams. there are a lot more who went on to be quality backups for other teams. qb isn’t our strong point. there’s fran, tommy kramer, and virtually no else who started more than 5 years.

by iseepurplepeople on Sep 4, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tough, Tough desicion

I just find it strange that over the last 3 years many Viking fans were calling for TJack’s head. Now that we have Favre, at the end of his career, many want to keep TJack. ??? I just don’t think he will ever be consistent enough to be a starter in this league. He has lots of ability, no doubt about it. But so did Troy Williamson. So did Jeff George. So did Michael Bennett. So did Erasmus James. So did, dare I say it, Herchel Walker. Get my drift?
I do find myself wondering why we hear so little about JDB. And when we do, the reports are always conflicting. I read somewhere that he was out-playing TJack and Sage during training camp. Then I read that he’s not fit to run the scout team. Is the organization keeping quiet so we can sneak him to the practice squad and keep TJack? Is he really doing well and therefore we can afford to dump Jackson? Do they both suck so much that we’re screwed either way if Favre goes down?

by NMVike on Sep 3, 2009 11:05 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

troy is still playing (surprisingly!) and starting (shock!!!). once jeff george got out of indy he did very well and was a starter for several more years. michael bennett went to the pro bowl and is still playing for san diego. erasmus james was just a plaing bust. say it or not, herschel walker was a stud running back and went on to start several more seasons after leaving the vikings.

so 3 of your 5 examples contradict your point.

by iseepurplepeople on Sep 4, 2009 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

keep more on the o-line less recievers if that has to be option there is still a lot of free agents to get

we could probably cutr 1 or 2 of them and sign someonelike harrison not saying him but there is like five of them out there and we may need more help on the o-line and probably tomorrow the d-line ndue to the williams getting hurt ans suspensions,t-jack we may neew to keep around as the #2 or 3 trade him if someone’s qb goes down and they have no backup like the pats

by clinton p on Sep 3, 2009 1:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Booty or TJ - It's up to ...

Booty or TJ it is up to TJ. That is right. I bet the VIKES offer a 2-3 year extension in modest salery to TJ hoping they can still groom him at the # 3 spot for th future. If he signs Booty is gone. If he does not sign TJ gets traded if possible or cut if necessary. If indeed SAGE & BOOTY only play Friday then you know he has not signed and he is trade bait. Why injure Mr. Fragile and ruin a trade. Does anyone know for sure that it is just SAGE & BOOTY Friday, or do we know it just is not BF.

by ZygiZag on Sep 3, 2009 10:15 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

TJ why?

Not really knowing how close TJ & Booty are in current ability I really could care less which ones stays. I think the STAFF wants to keep TJ because of the amount of time & effort and ego they have invested, but they don’t want to keep him if he is going to leave next year after riding the pine at # 3 all year.

by ZygiZag on Sep 3, 2009 10:21 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Tjack is better than Booty right now.

Booty could turn out to be better than Jackson in the future, but we don’t have enough play time to even come close to knowing either way.

Jackson is the safer bet. He also has had a lot of time and money invested in him and that does play into the decision. But the decision is easy if you know which one is better.

by Bjorno on Sep 4, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eight Players Don't Dress Every Week

If one of them (if not two) is always a quarterback, having four QB’s is not that much of a disadvantage. If the 53rd guy to make the roster were that critical to the team’s success, he most likely would not be the 53rd man. The Viking roster may have good depth this season, but it’s not like they’ll be forced to cut an All Pro guy.

Four QB’s is still an option.

by Elgar on Sep 4, 2009 12:29 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!
Start posting about the Vikings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Viking_flag_small
Why Brett Favre should Decide by April 20
Percy-harvin_small
Year in Memory
Avatar_small
Saints fans heckled Favre while injured
Favre_small
all you fair weather fans can go fist yourself
Viking_flag_small
Bobby McCray Nominated for Cheap Shot Artist of the Week

Recent FanPosts

Tommy-kramer-_small
2011- The year of the NFL Lockout- No Football or Scab Football
Small
Brett Favre = Y.A. Tittle Redux
Avatar_small
Former Vikings in the Super Bowl
Small
No one yells at manning
Small
Superbowl 44 - Who will win it?
Images_small
Should/Could/Would the Vikings Trade Bryant McKinnie?
Avatar_small
John Randle will enter the Hall of Fame
Percy_small
Anyone interested in Favre Pro Bowl Jersey

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Gang Green Nation
Donte Stallworth: Pursue or No?
Turf Show Times
Random Ramsdom 2/7
Turf Show Times
Rams must answer two questions about their offensive line

Head Coach

Dailynorseman_small Gonzo

Coordinators

Dodge_front_small MilCardFan

Victory__small ericj69

Childress_small Anthony21