Lost in the Shuffle
Wow. That's pretty much all that can be said. It has been and will continue to be discussed to death, but how bout old man Favre and Greg "Cut Bobby Wade For Me" Lewis? Pretty insane. However, there's one small facet of the game that would have made the last drive completely moot that I don't think should be looked over.
The Vikings screwed the pooch on their penultimate drive, with Favre throwing a pass behind Harvin (I think?) on fourth and five. Everyone thought, "Oh crap, there it goes. Typical Vikings. Lose it in the end." But wait, what's that little number next to the score? Time outs? The Vikings have three?
Seriously, when was the last time the Minnesota Vikings had all three timeouts left at the end of a game when they absolutely needed every single one of them. I can't remember. Chalk that up to great preparation, organization, and coaching.
Yes, coaching.
Chilly and Co. had everyone ready to go in the second half, at least from a playcalling and a "Let's get the play off quick" standpoint. No wasted time outs. All three were ready to go at the end of the game. If Minnesota only had two, it's game over. No questions. No ifs, ands, or buts about it.
Guys and gals, this type of things never happens to the Vikings. This is what the great teams do - get lucky and make huge plays when they need. I still can't believe this happened, and it was a complete all around effort, top to bottom, left to right.
I just don't want the fact that the Vikings had all three time outs left, under two minutes, when the team needed every single second left on the clock to make that final Favre to Lewis "give me an aneurysm" catch.
Wow. I still can't believe it happened.
The stars are aligning. This just does not happen to the Vikings.
Edit:
From Sports Illustrated's main page, because it's so awesome:

This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.
0 recs |
31 comments
Comments
Same Here
I’m still suffering from PTSD after that Favre to Lewis connection… …we haven’t seen a drive / play / throw / catch like that since Moss and Culpepper were hooking up back in day.
by solafide on Sep 28, 2009 8:53 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Great point
Those timeouts were extremely important. I remember the niners QB calling a couple throughout the game due to noise and what-not. Great job by coach and QB.
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have"
Thomas Jefferson
by RileysCannibalJct on Sep 28, 2009 8:56 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Our 3 down % is also drastically better now too. As are the number of penalties now that Ryan Cook is off the line. Great strides in the right direction.
I do wish we found some creativity on offense however. Still fairly vanilla.
by PurpleJesus on Sep 28, 2009 8:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
very vanilla
i mean seriously you come out in a 2te i formation on 1 and 10. . . . i wonder if you are gonna run the ball…i understand we want the best run blockers in there when AP is gonna run, but a little trickery would be nice to see, maybe we wouldn’t need BF to pull one of his crazy from behind wins
by pride4purple on Sep 28, 2009 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously, when was the last time the Minnesota Vikings had all three timeouts left at the end of a game when they absolutely needed every single one of them
I said the EXACT same thing to the people I was watching the game with. Although we did take 2 delay of game penalties that could have eaten up a couple of those timeouts, it is the first time in recent memory that we’ve been prepared to hold a team to one final 3 and out.
If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal
by TheViking83 on Sep 28, 2009 9:02 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Seriously, when was the last time the Minnesota Vikings had all three timeouts left at the end of a game when they absolutely needed every single one of them
That was due to BF realizing the we can probably come back from a 1st or 2nd and 15 and not having to burn a time out. That’s experience baby. A lesser QB would have definitely called a time out, remember last year when Gus burned 1 on our own 4 yd line( i was like come on with the penalty we would have moved back what 1 yard maybe 2)
This is what BF brings to the vikings: the ability to overcome our bad coaching with on the field leadership. You can’t teach that you have to experience it.
by midnightwonder on Sep 28, 2009 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That, and how about the most efficient
two minute drill the Vikings executed in over five years. It was crisp, there was a sense of urgency, and there were no wasted seconds or dumb plays, like a freakin’ screen pass over the middle. When they went over the middle, it was for chunks of yards, not bits and pieces.
No disrespect to Sage or TJ, but not only do they NOT make that throw to Lewis, but they don’t run the two minute drill that efficiently. I guarantee that TJ and Sage would’ve hit a check down guy more than once and wasted precious time.
That last 1:30 is the exact reason Brett Favre is a Minnesota Viking.
So I write a blog, like everyone else on the Internet: www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com
by MilCardFan on Sep 28, 2009 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A thing of beauty...
I’m with you on that, MilCard. To me, the 2-minute drill is the purest essence of the game, for either side, the whole game coming down to that one little snippet of play-time where you throw everything you have at it, bathwater AND baby if necessary. It separates the real from the wannabes and there’s nothing in a football game that I love seeing more than a finely executed (or hard-stopped) 2-minute drill.
Seeing it happen in Purple, for the first time in years…. was enough to bring tears to the eyes. I don’t know how long it’s been since I’ve seen it done without any time-outs left to play with, either. Tark, Kramer, Moon…. I don’t think I ever saw Daunte do it without a pocket full of time-outs.
I still think T-Jack can get the job done from time to time, and Sage might be ok as well, but both those boys better be kneeling at the feet of the Master right now, seeking knowledge and understanding. Favre just reminded us all of what a real NFL first-rate QB is expected to be able to do.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
by DCPurple on Sep 29, 2009 8:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chilly will always
have vanilla looking plays. His MO is to out execute the opposition, whether they know what you are doing or not. At the end of the day it doesn’t matter whether they know if you all do your job. If every blocker picks up his man, odds are we get a decent run. The 49ers do a great job of run defense and it showed. They aren’t very good at pass defense because they stack the box, but because we have two first year starters on the line especially Loadholt who needs a lot of pass blocking reps and is going against smaller faster rushers. I mean, how fast can you expect a 6-7 340 lbs guy to be?
by TheEvilProfessor on Sep 28, 2009 10:09 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Do you really think the Vikings out-executed?
I don’t think that Chilly planned to give them a TD on a FG attempt.
AP averaged less than 2 ypc on 15 of his 19 runs.
Dropped passes were a constant problem.
The Vikings were behind at halftime AGAIN…
I’m sure there are more details that I don’t care to drudge up right now, but no way did the Vikings win because of superior execution.
by KC Viking on Sep 28, 2009 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We did out execute! Loadholt?
Loadholt gave up the blocked kick, and the 10 point swing. Loadholt made three or four other bad plays, but Hutch also had some guys get by him. Sullivan played really BAD, he stood out, he leeked in the middle all game.
We out played them today, but especially in the first half. The blocked kick killed us.
by Duluth Viking on Sep 28, 2009 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I found this to be rather funny.
On ESPN’s main page, they have a poll as to what was the “G” moment. Here is how the voting went on a state by state basis:

Blue is the Farve to Lewis catch, yellow is the Donald Driver catch.
Notice a pattern?
by Bjorno on Sep 28, 2009 10:38 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Jeeze.
Packers’ fans are so arrogant. Really? A very nice one-handed catch against the Rams (the freakin’ RAMS!) or a last second, thirty yard bomb to Greg Lewis with two seconds left to win the game – there’s actually a choice there?
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Sep 28, 2009 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I mean... come on...
all of these silly ESPN polls have obvious fan-bias. If it had been the other way around, I’d have still voted for the Vikes play just out of spite. I mean, it’s just a meaningless SC poll.
If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal
by TheViking83 on Sep 28, 2009 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm different.
I can easily respect a game winning play on the last second on a huge catch compared to a one hander down the sideline.
I mean, let’s put it this way. Would you vote for the Favre to Lewis catch, or the Gentle Ben to Santonio Holmes Super Bowl winner?
In their own context, their amazing catches. Comparitively? Holmes gets it hands down, because it’s the Super Bowl.
But that’s Packers’ fans for you.
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Sep 28, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Big Ben to Holmes
What bothers me about that catch is that the camera angle on the replay is everything. From the wrong angle… Holmes didn’t pull it off. There’s only one angle on that shot that actually shows clearly that he had both feet in, and there’s another angle that you get it inferred because there’s a little ‘bounce’ on the second foot which could only happen if it touched. Thank God for great camera operators and high resolution, because it really demonstrates to me that relying solely on the refs is just not a good idea in some cases. Not the ref’s fault (for once), it’s just that it all depends on the angle you see it from and we’ve been on the wrong end of the ref’s calls more than once.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
by DCPurple on Sep 29, 2009 8:16 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This just does not happen to the Vikings.
Thanks for the sentiment Manimal!!! I tried to tell my wife that yesterday. i dont really think she gets it…like WE ALL do!!! Times are obviously changing. Thanks Bart!!!!!!
Is it just me? Or did the Vikings dominate that game & still somehow manage to keep the 9ers in the damned thing? Should have been over by mid-second half. Skol!!
by Viking64 on Sep 28, 2009 11:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
0 for 11
That is what is lost in the shuffle. The 49’ers were 0-11 on third down. Way to go D. Every team has some talent and the niners more than most. But when it got to third down the D really stepped it up. I cannot remember having 3 time outs nor can I remember ever snuffing them completly on third down.
Skol Vikings
by SouthernNorseman on Sep 28, 2009 11:50 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
That and when you compare Willis’ stats to EJ’s, I think it’s fair to say that EJ was more productive. He’s having a great year :)
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
by DCPurple on Sep 29, 2009 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Say what you will about the timeouts, but there was at least 1 clock management issue.
There were 2 seconds left on the clock after the Winner.
Had the kickoff been a shorter one (not necessarily a squib, or one of those), then the 9ers would have had zero chance of coming back. As it turned out, Vernon Davis’s career day ended when he dropped what could have been their winner.
But why did Vernon have his best day ever vs. us in the first place if everything went as planned?
by KC Viking on Sep 28, 2009 11:52 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The clock doesn't start until the other team touches the ball.
If you kick it deep, there is a chance for blocks to get set up. Kick it short, and they have to either play the lateral game or fair catch it. I had no issue with the final kick.
And honestly, that’s not really a clock management issue, ha.
Visit:
http://www.vikingvigil.com
Skol Vikings!
Woot Woot!
by Manimal on Sep 28, 2009 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
As I understand it...
…a kickoff must be fielded with the exception of touchbacks. Punts may be fair caught. There is nothing in the NFL.com rulebook about fair catching a kickoff.
So, the clock would not have started until the 9ers fielded the squib or short kickoff, but they would not have had a play from scrimmage unless the receiver was able to run oob in less than 2 seconds.
by KC Viking on Sep 29, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You like to find the one dark cloud on the planet don’t you?
We are the vikings.......resistance is futile.
by Hoss-Drone on Sep 28, 2009 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No.
I do long for the return of the days when I can be nearly certain that the Vikings aren’t just a luckier team or the beneficiaries of an easy schedule, but the real deal. See also: 1998, 2001, and probably another year or two around that time plus the late 80s-mid 90s with those amazing defensive lines.
Favre is our chance to do some damage in the playoffs, and I don’t want to see it wasted due to poor game plans, predictable playcalling, and other small details.
by KC Viking on Sep 29, 2009 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A short kick is the best.
It should have been an onside kick though. Because someone would have deifintely had to touch the ball and the clock would have started.
by midnightwonder on Sep 28, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
noooooooo!
onside kick is a bad idea in that situation. Let them start the lateral game from our 40 yard line? Or they just let the ball go whizzing by them out of bounds? Or if they somehow get down with only a second ticking off the clock, they’ve got a chance at a 57ish yard field goal to tie.
What they did was good. Put the ball on their side of the field and force them to throw up a prayer.
If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal
by TheViking83 on Sep 28, 2009 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A shorter kick would not have worked...
The receiving team would still be allowed to fair catch anything in the air and anything kept on the ground wouldn’t give the coverage team enough time to get down field. The vikes played that one correctly.
by Miidwest on Sep 28, 2009 12:01 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
...agreed, and...
many people probably knew that the correct answer to the trivia question “Which former Viking QB can throw the ball 80 yards through the air?” is not “Shaun Hill”.
by Elgar on Sep 28, 2009 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Time the Avenger
The remaining time was the critical factor. Favre consumed the clock with absolute mastery on that final drive, leaving the 49’ers with only 2 seconds of play.
As long as the kickoff put them further back than the 50 yard line, they had to get a TD or nothing else was good enough. They had time for just 1 play. If they had had good enough field position, an FG could have sent the game into OT.
There was one last other possibility…. if Hill tossed his ‘Hail Mary’ and they got a pass interference down around the 20 yard line. The question is, on a PI, does the clock get reset? Because if it does, then they could have gotten one more play and that meant the FG would turn the trick. I don’t know, I checked a number of sources and couldn’t find it covered, so maybe not.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
by DCPurple on Sep 29, 2009 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The game cannot end on a defensive penalty
So a play could happen with no time left in that case.
by KC Viking on Sep 29, 2009 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














