5 Questions With The Acme Packing Company

It's Packer week. Packer week means an Orwellian type Hate Week for me---speeches discussing the obvious communistic traits of Mike McCarthy, the terrorist sympathies that Ted Thompson overtly displays in his drafting, and unadulterated screaming at a big picture of Aaron Rodgers and Mike McCarthy. Why? IT'S THE PACKERS. We HATE the Packers. Why? Because they're PACKERS!! THE CIRCULAR LOGIC IS FLAWLESS AND MUST NOT BE QUESTIONED! We hate the Packers and have always been at war with the Packers.
Hence, the red alert siren.
DEFCON-1!! Dive, Dive, dive, BAAAAAAOOOOOOGA!!!! (that's a dive alarm from a submarine, if you didn't get that)
So with that backdrop, I'd like to welcome Emmanuel Goldstein of the Brotherhood the fine blogger Texwestern of Acme Packing Company, as we look ahead to the Sunday Night Tilt at The Most Hallowed Ground In Football Randy Moss' Personal Playground, where we hope to see a full moon or two.
Thanks to Tex and the good people of APC for taking time out to discuss the upcoming game with their most bitter rival. I have submitted answers to their questions, and they will be posted over at APC for your perusal.
Q and A with Texwestern, after the jump
1) If there seems to be an overriding theme to the 2010 Green Bay Season so far, it would be injuries. Ryan Grant, Nick Barnett, and Jermichael Finley are all essentially done for the year, and the list of walking wounded resembles a Civil War casualty list as opposed to a modern day NFL roster. What's the latest on the more significant guys for your team--who's playing and who isn't, and how effective do you think LB Clay Matthews will be with his hamstring?
At this rate, I’ll be suiting up in Green and Gold by week 11. Clay Matthews practiced this week, but he wasn’t full speed. However, if there’s any way he can play, he will, because as much as Charles Woodson meant to our defense last year, Matthews might mean more now. I would still prefer a less-than-100% Matthews over just about anyone else. In the secondary, Al Harris and Atari Bigby are off the PUP list, and both practiced this week. Harris looks more likely to play on Sunday, and would give the packers another savvy veteran to help cover Moss and Harvin. Both offensive tackles were limited this week, as were starters A.J. Hawk and Ryan Pickett. We’ll need all of them to play this week, and it’s not yet clear who’s ready to go.
2) Speaking of Ryan Grant, when he went down the running game disappeared. Brandon Jackson doesn't seem to be the answer. Why didn't Green Bay make a play for Marshawn Lynch, and what do you expect from the running game for the rest of the season?
First of all, Brandon Jackson isn’t cut out to be an every-down back. That has been evident to Packers fans since he was drafted. I still think he can be effective on draws and swing passes, but the coaching staff doesn’t seem to be using his skill set the way I’d like. As for Marshawn Lynch, many people over at APC were upset by Ted Thompson’s unwillingness to make a deal. Others didn’t think Lynch was an upgrade over what we have. Other people think that Ted is putting his faith in 6th rounder James Starks, who is hoping to be activated off the PUP list in the near future. I must admit, I was hopeful when the Marion Barber rumors were swirling earlier this week, but it appears we’re stuck with Jackson and Kuhn. Frankly, the best I’m hoping for the rest of the year is that Jackson breaks a few big gains like his 71-yard run against Washington, and that the passing game gets us to the goal line so Kuhn can ram it in.
3) The offense had a great year last season, but Aaron Rodgers doesn't seem to be putting up the numbers like he was last year. Is that because of an ineffective running game, or are there other reasons?
There’s no question that the lack of a running game has been a factor. Teams aren’t respecting it this year, which means they’re dropping more men into coverage. Greg Jennings and Donald Driver just haven’t been able to find as much space in the secondary and defenses don’t need to worry about the play-action pass, a staple of the Packers’ offense. Add in the recent injury to Finley and you have a number of reasons why the passing game isn’t where it needs to be.
4) Give me a player on offense and defense most Viking fans haven't heard of, and why we need to be worried about them.
On offense, watch for TE Andrew Quarless. He’s a 5th-round pick out of Penn State, and has shown flashes of great talent. He’ll be asked to play a major role with Jermichael Finley injured. In fact, he’s sort of a poor man’s Finley: athletic but very raw. Keep an eye on OLB Frank Zombo as well. Not only does he have the best name on the team, but he’s got a nonstop motor, the kind that comes from being an undrafted free-agent. Like Quarless, he needs to learn the game a little better, but he’s made the transition from college end to pro linebacker pretty well, and he’s fun to watch.
5) Is the offensive line better than it was last season when our two teams met, or will Jared Allen and the Williams Wall have a repeat performance from 2009?
Like last year, both games are in the middle of the season. Unlike last year, when Chad Clifton and Mark Tauscher were inactive for both games with injuries, they should both play. That alone should help the line…somewhat. As much as I like Clifton, I’m concerned that his knees are finally shot, and Tauscher is aging as well. The rookie Bulaga has both impressed and disappointed so far at different times. I’ll say overall, the line is marginally better, but mainly because T.J. Lang and Allen Barbre aren’t starting.
As for a prediction…I’m going to have to be a homer and be optimistic. I choose to assume that Matthews will play and wreak havoc, that Favre will turn the ball over, and that the offense does just enough to squeak out a tight 26-24 victory for the Pack. Can’t say I feel very confident about anything in this game though, and if you’re in a pick’em pool, I would put the minimum points on this game, regardless of who I’d end up picking. I guess I just don’t see either team sweeping two games this year, and I give the Pack the slight advantage at home.
Good luck this weekend, and hopefully we’ll see a clean game with no major injuries on either side. Lord knows we can’t afford any more.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good Q&A
You definitely hit on the right things. The lack of a FA move at running back is still reverberating throughout our site. I was a big Lynch guy, we all assumed it was cause the asking price was like a 2nd rounder or something but when he went for the price he did, some of us were pretty pissed.
I think the key reason the Packers offense isn’t going right is play-calling. We’ve completely abandoned screens and slants. I feel like every play they are trying to go deep and its completely ineffective and easy to defend if you are doing it all the time. What made it work so well in the past was good play-calling around it (running, screens, slants) and then making occasional field stretching plays.
Haven't thought about that
But you’re right…not much short passing to speak of. You’d think they would do it more to relieve the pressure on Rodgers.
Wait, what am I saying? Keep chucking the ball down field Pack! It’s totally working!!
Proud contributor to Daily Norseman and SB Nation Minnesota
by Eric J. Thompson on Oct 22, 2010 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions 2 recs
I'm going to do my best to be respectful here.
But doesn’t it seem a little desperate, seeing as how nearly every injured Packer from last week is begin activated this game? (OK, that’s a SLIGHT exageration…) Obviously, for a multitude of reasons, this is a very important game, but is it worth risking a further injury that could potentially sideline a player even longer throughout the season?
injury reports
basically show the FO as using precaution for practice..
I would likely be expecting D. Driver to be playing Sunday and the injury may be minor, but likely just regular precautions… No sense in getting injured in practice, since it prevents you from playing when it really matters.
I don’t think it’s “desperate” to try to get as many players as you can back on the field for what may turn out to be the most important game of the year for them to win, in terms of playoff positioning. I think it is smart. If the players can play, and are healthy enough to improve the chances of winning over not playing them, then I would play them too. Call me a desperate kinda guy :)
Right
I’m not sure that it’s desperate. I think a lot of guy were actually held out last week in hopes that they’d be ready for this game.
by packallday555 on Oct 22, 2010 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions
Thompson refusing to make a deal...and injuries to Packers.
It has been normal for him. Why do we question him now? I have never supported the way Ted Thompson runs the team. Most other fans bash me for it. TT likes to play the players HE picks and no one else…unless he has no other choice (and most times not even then). As much as I am disappointed with Mike McCarthy, I do not mind him as much. He has taken a lot of heat, but as you say the play calling has been suspect. Supposedly, the reason for the mediocre offensive performances is because of the lack of Finley. I am not so sure. Rodgers is simply better when he gets rid of the ball quickly as you say, TreverR. Rodgers thinking too much = bad news for Packers fans. Let the guy run on instincts and he delivers.
As for injured players, this is not the worst I have seen as a Packer fan. Believe it or not, 2005 was worse. We still have WRs, backup RB and an OL (such as it is) this time around. The defense is more banged up, but that happens. I am not so sure about rushing some injured players back. I hope they can handle it. Better to risk a game than to risk the health of not-up-to-full-speed players. I know it is the Vikings, and we Packers fans want the Packers to win this one big time. Yet I want a healthy team for the future more than anything else.
He’s right about Zombo. The guy is playing fairly good, but still under the radar.
While Quarless has looked good,it is still early (he’s only in because Finley is out). I think he was drafted lower because of drug use issues, so he’s really more a higher draft pick, talent wise.
Yeah, Zombo’s been better than expected for sure. It was too bad that he hit Cutler helmet to helmet on that sack towards the end of the game.
With Matthews out last week I was excited to see what I thought would be a full game of Zombo (or close too). Instead, we saw he and Jones in a rotation with Poppinga being the full time starter in Clay’s place. Pretty disappointing. We know what we have in Poppinga. We don’t know with Zombo and Jones. Why not take the opportunity to see if we can find a little more out?
I think he had pot problems, and some attitude issues. Not sure if you’ve seen but he has “God’s gift” tattoed on the back of his arms.
by packallday555 on Oct 22, 2010 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions
HATE!!!!
Hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate hate….
I’m going to the Wisconsin-Iowa football game today, and I’ll be wearing a Vikings hat, because all those red and white-wearing Badgers fans today will be putting on their green and gold tomorrow.
I’m also wearing a University of Minnesota shirt to make EVERYBODY in the stadium hate me, or uh, laugh at me.
/good riddance Tim Brewster
by Midnight Rambler on Oct 23, 2010 9:14 AM CDT reply actions

by 





























