It's Time To Start Tarvaris Jackson
Watching the VIkings so far this season has been an exercise in frustration for me. This is a talented team that went out and got more talent after the season kicked off (Randy Moss), yet they find themselves at 2-4, with a gut wrenching loss to Green Bay in the rearview mirror.
What worked so well last season, namely Brett Favre, hasn't worked this year. You know the stats, and they are telling. Already more interceptions in 6 games than all of last season, the 30th ranked passer percentage in the NFL, and decision making that at times borders on the ludicrous. Add in two fractures in Favre's ankle, and it seems to me there can only be one choice for QB this Sunday in New England, Tarvaris Jackson.
Believe me, those are hard words to type. But when removing the emotion from it, it becomes almost obvious for me.
To lay blame solely at the feet of Brett Favre is ridiculous, because that would be patently false. Receivers haven't always run correct routes, the offensive line has stuggled at times, Brad Childress has been glaringly incompetent at times this season, don't even get me started on the officiating, and defensively, there is virtually zero pressure being put on the opposing quarterback. But for me, Favre seems like a different guy than last year. He has looked indifferent more often than not, and I think that feeling can permeate, especially when it comes from a guy as iconic as he is.
It just hasn't clicked this year, for whatever reason. Favre looks distracted, and at times I get the feeling he'd rather be anywhere other than playing for the Vikings...or anyone...this season. And there are a lot of reasons to be distracted, from the ankle, to the bad start, to the Jenn Sterger stuff.
When the Vikings were looking at bringing in Favre last season, I asked myself this question: If I were to just look at the stat lines alone, and not associate his stats with who that player was or what team he might have played for for 16 years, would I want that guy as the starting quarterback of the team I love? The answer was, if he's healthy, hell yes. He gives us the best chance to win, and we might have ourselves something special here. He was, and we did. 2009 was better for me in many ways than 1998, for a lot of reasons.
In looking at the situation as it stands today, I keep coming back to that same question, asked in a slightly different way: If I were to look at just the stat lines and injury situation alone, and not associate those stats with the player's name or reputation, would it be reasonable to remove that guy as the starter and let the backup start until the other guy is healthy? For me, again, the answer is an unequivocal yes. Favre's play has been subpar, and now he has absolutely zero mobility. If Favre's mobility is as limited on Sunday as it was at the post game press conference, it would seem that playing Favre would border on the criminally negligent. Okay, a bit over the top there. It would be foolish to start Favre for a number of reasons.
New England plays a base 3-4, which the Vikings offensive line has had trouble dealing with historically. The Pats would be bringing everything at Favre from the first snap, and he would be at risk of an even more serious injury, because all he could do would be to just stand there and get hit. For the VIkings to keep Favre protected, they would almost be forced into a two tight end snap, greatly limiting the options available to them offensively. So, to protect Favre, you're keeping one of your big playmakers off the field, and that also plays into New England's hands.
Tarvaris Jackson gives you mobility, and quite frankly, the Vikings need to know whether or not Jackson is the answer for next season. I'm sure he's learned watching Favre, and he has Randy Moss to throw to, so the circumstances for Jackson are different than when he first got here and struggled.
Look, I love what Favre has brought to this team, and I want him healthy for the stretch run for the playoffs--yes, I believe that this team can go to the playoffs. And I believe that they will go to the playoffs, but they need to get a win in New England, and they need to get Favre healthy so he is at his best in November and December.
The quickest way to do both, in my opinion, is to let Tarvaris Jackson start Sunday.
174 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He's been immobile all season
and it’s only going to be worse if he plays with TWO fractures in his ankle.
No, he’s got to sit, at least for 2-3 weeks.
by Shawn Gillogly on Oct 26, 2010 12:06 PM CDT reply actions
I agree.
Favre will have to swallow his pride and let this happen. Give him a few weeks to get healthy.
And if T-Jack plays really well.. We’ll go from there.
by PurplePeopleEaters on Oct 26, 2010 12:06 PM CDT reply actions
I've been saying it since the Sterger thing.
If his wife cant trust him anymore, I sure as heck cant. I’ve lost all faith in Favre. Instead of expecting miracles like we got last year, I am prepared for the interceptions. Right now, Favre is no longer contributing to the team.
I’ve been waiting to see Jackson out there for a while now. I think he’s ready. He’s confident. And he’s far more dangerous in the pocket than Favre is right now.
Let the reign of Tavaris Jackson begin!
Follow me on twitter @peter_dantes
by i_am_pure_barbarian on Oct 26, 2010 12:12 PM CDT reply actions
Let the reign of Tavaris Jackson begin!
again!
"Baseball is the only major sport that appears backward in a mirror" ~George Carlin
by thewild_viking_twins on Oct 26, 2010 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Yep again...
But this time he is throwing the ball to Randy Moss and Percy Harvin instead of Bobby Wade and Troy Williamson.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wra8IDDF_dM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WZNyYouzuk
NSFW audio:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PInDbfGP5Ac
funny vids...i especially like the facemask drop.
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
Yup, Ted's stuff was different than mine.
I just decided to voice my pro-Jackson opinions now.
Follow me on twitter @peter_dantes
by i_am_pure_barbarian on Oct 26, 2010 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions
It Depends on the Severity of the Injury
I’ve played on a ankled fracture before, and while it hurt like hell, I was still able to move. Now, I would imagine that professional athletes have better access to anesthetic than an amateur.
However, if it severely impairs his mobility, T-jax has to start.
Anesthetic?
Try this: Sit on your foot until it falls asleep. Then stand up and try to run across the room. Be sure to get a video camera rolling before you try this.
If you hit your crotch
You could probably send it in to AFHV and get $5k for it.
I can't agree more
but I also can’t get rid of the cringe on my face as I do so
WR, CB, K & P of the Minnesota Machine
Remember TJ put that cringe on your face long ago
And he’ll put it back on there just because he cares.. This is like a nightmare for me…
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
and Favre *hasn't* been cringeworthy?
At this point, it’s the lesser of 2 evils. At least until Favre can move in the pocket again.
by Shawn Gillogly on Oct 28, 2010 2:12 AM CDT up reply actions
Coach has to go as well
If we don’t spice up our playbook, both on offence and defence, it doesn’t matter who our QB is.
I'd like to see them give the head job to Frazier, so we can keep him.
by Ted Harwood on Oct 26, 2010 12:22 PM CDT up reply actions
agree with this
I would like to see Frazier as the coach
A successful coach needs a patient wife, loyal dog, and great quarterback - and not necessarily in that order.
-- Bud Grant
by PurpleValhalla on Oct 26, 2010 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions
I was thinking about that today.
Some people think that firing a coach mid-season means your giving up. I’m not so sure about that, in our case. Frasier would be a great interim head coach. Bevel would run our offense. I’m not so confident in the latter, but maybe he would open things up a little more.
QB play has been a much bigger issue, but I’ve just never been a fan of Chilly. I feel like we won games last year despite him.
by PurplePeopleEaters on Oct 26, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions
I *know* we've won
in spite of Klink. And I agree we need to promote Les before we lose him.
by Shawn Gillogly on Oct 26, 2010 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Dont expect the offensive playbook to get spiced up for Tjack
"We have a right to be proud, for in our veins flows the blood of many brave races who fought as the lion fights for lordship. Here, in the whirlpool of European races, the Ugric tribe bore down from Iceland the fighting spirit which Thor and Odin gave them, which their Berserkers displayed to such fell intent on the seaboards of Europe, ay, and of Asia and Africa too, till the peoples thought that the werewolves themselves had come."
-from Bram Stoker's Dracula
Yeah that was part of the problem when we played him before
TJ couldn’t get all the plays down after two years so Childress had to lighten it…. This is going to be a disaster.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
What evidence do you have to support your opinion?
"We have a right to be proud, for in our veins flows the blood of many brave races who fought as the lion fights for lordship. Here, in the whirlpool of European races, the Ugric tribe bore down from Iceland the fighting spirit which Thor and Odin gave them, which their Berserkers displayed to such fell intent on the seaboards of Europe, ay, and of Asia and Africa too, till the peoples thought that the werewolves themselves had come."
-from Bram Stoker's Dracula
That it's been 4 1/2 years!
I could learn the playbook in 4 1/2 years.
But beyond that, Mike Mayock has said several times that Jackson has come a long way in the last couple years just talking to him and watching film with him.
Considering how bad TJack was as a starter...
That’s not saying much
"We have a right to be proud, for in our veins flows the blood of many brave races who fought as the lion fights for lordship. Here, in the whirlpool of European races, the Ugric tribe bore down from Iceland the fighting spirit which Thor and Odin gave them, which their Berserkers displayed to such fell intent on the seaboards of Europe, ay, and of Asia and Africa too, till the peoples thought that the werewolves themselves had come."
-from Bram Stoker's Dracula
Considering how Favre played just last season.
How the mighty have fallen…
and because
we might get to see if we need to draft a starting qb this year, rather than wait til next
That and
He could just high jump over the line into the endzone…..get him out running with harvin and peterson nearby and do some laterals. those kind of runners cant be stopped!
by EventualChamps! on Oct 26, 2010 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Kevin Seifert's thoughts on the subject
by PurplePeopleEaters on Oct 26, 2010 12:24 PM CDT reply actions
Seifert neglects to mention
He says that 24 QB’s have a higher completion percentage this season than Jackson’s career 58.7%. What he neglects to mention is that Brett Favre is NOT one of those QB’s. I feel that is a relevant fact in this discussion.
Very relevant.
Add to that the fact that the receivers he had couldn’t catch a cold, and you have to give him at least 2 percentage points.
Sorry to spam this thread...
I don’t think Favre has looked “indifferent”. He looks out of it at times, but he’s showed a lot of emotion. He’s literally cried after games. He definitely cares about his performance, but he has looked distracted.
by PurplePeopleEaters on Oct 26, 2010 12:27 PM CDT reply actions
Yeah I don’t get why people keep saying that. While I appreciate Ted picking up the banner I started carrying on this last night, and doing it in a responsible manner (for the good of the whole team, and it may not be permanent) … I don’t get that fifth paragraph, where he says Favre looks like he doesn’t even want to be there when he’s out playing. I don’t see that. At all.
Otherwise … like I said, thanks for taking up the arguement.
Whoops
I just posted basically the same poll before I saw yours! I was just trying to learn how navigate the thing, and actually it wasn’t that bad. It’s a really tough decision on who to start, but if our defensive line doesn’t play better, it will be a moot point! I love Favre but he does seem to be lacking the fire this year!
I felt strongly....
… we should have benched Favre in the first half of the Jets game. Yeah, he had a pretty effective second half. But still.
The main knock on Jackson is consistency. But Favre has been shockingly inconsistent.
Moreover, it’s like the coaches don’t trust him to get it done. The Vikings are paying a guy $16 million to hand off to Peterson the majority of the time. Jackson can do that, and maybe without fumbling too. When you have a 60-40 or even 70-30 run/pass ratio, and then the guy passing is hovering around 50% completion with 10 picks, it’s time to bench him and move on.
I was ready for it two weeks ago. It was all getting ridiculous two weeks ago. If Favre trots out on a fractured ankle vs. New England, I think I won’t even watch the game. It’s going to be a train wreck. There is also the potential you note that Favre might get a really serious, life-changing injury, and none of us wants that to happen. He can’t move and then he can’t protect himself.
Not something I want to witness.
It might be a train wreck with Tavaris Jackson, too. I understand that. I’m not sure Jackson is the long-term answer. I also don’t think Favre is the only problem.
But at least with Tavaris Jackson, I don’t KNOW it’s going to be a train wreck.
There’s just a little suspense there that will keep me watching.
by HammeroftheGods on Oct 26, 2010 12:50 PM CDT reply actions
Reminds me of Robert Smith
I was totally bummed the day Robert Smith retired. I know he had A LOT of quality runs left in him. But he got out before he was wheelchair bound for life (that and I don’t think he got along with Moss but that’s not the point.) I have the utmost admiration for Favre’s endurance but he might want to think a little more long term, depending what the doctors say I suppose.
Robert Smith...
… was probably very smart to get out. He definitely was peaking. But a running back takes a serious pounding.
Favre is way past leaving when it was smart from a health point of view. I think he knows that.
But I wonder now, even with his remarkable durability, that he might be in real jeopardy if he can’t move. You know, a guys life can change in a moment.
by HammeroftheGods on Oct 26, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Favre is done for the most part....
the only thing that is keeping that from being obvious is his unbelievable talent and ability which surfaces only occasionally now, creating the illusion that he still has what it takes. I have enjoyed the all too short run with him.
Either we're trying to win the Super Bowl or we're not
If we’re trying to win the Super Bowl, we gotta sit Favre for a while and let him heal so he’ll be ready to go for the playoffs. He’s not going to get healthier while he’s taking hits every week.
Hell, if his consecutive start streak is that important, let him take the first snap and then pull him from the game. Everyone will make fun of us, but that’ll happen regardless.
Agree with this
Problem is, he may never heal. His ankle has been bad since last NFC Champiosnhip game, even with surgery to try and correct it. The fact that we have NE coming up doesn’t make it any easier. That being said, from what I have seen, we are getting about a 50% Favre, not a 100% Favre. And that makes me say play TJack this game and let’s see what the hell he has in him!
Face it, Favre didn’t help us win any of these games. His turnovers have hurt our chances, not helped. And TJack at least tries to take care of the ball and that is what we need. Someone to hit the open man occassionally, have some scrambling ability to slow the rush, and hand it to AD all freakin’ day. In those cases, we will be in any game….
To me, this is a no brainer….
If he doesn’t heal, he doesn’t heal. But he definitley won’t heal if it’s not given a chance.
Anyway, I’m concluding from the injury reports out yesterday that it will mostly heal in fairly short order (maybe 3 weeks)
agreed
Even if you believe Favre gives us the best chance to win this week, playing on a broken ankle is only going to make things worse.
When do you want Favre able to play, now in an inter-conference game that has about as little effect on the team as a regular season game can have; or in the stretch and playoffs, when every game’s importance is magnified?
by Shawn Gillogly on Oct 26, 2010 6:05 PM CDT up reply actions
It's T-Jack's Time
Let’s hope he’s ready.
To lay blame solely at the feet of Brett Favre is ridiculous, because that would be patently false.
Agreed.
But for me, Favre seems like a different guy than last year. He has looked indifferent more often than not, and I think that feeling can permeate, especially when it comes from a guy as iconic as he is.
If he could bring the team, and us, the amazing sense of joy and fun that he brought last year, then his unhappiness (or indifference, if you prefer) will also communicate itself. This is not a team that looks motivated…
If Favre’s mobility is as limited on Sunday as it was at the post game press conference, it would seem that playing Favre would border on the criminally negligent. Okay, a bit over the top there.
No, it’s not over the top. To take a man who’s already injured, and place him in harms way, especially when you know his injuries make him even more vulnerable, is criminally negligent. To do it just to get a win for a football team is beyond criminal.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
by DCPurple on Oct 26, 2010 12:58 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
Got to give this a rec
It’s not always about winning and losing… If he seriously can’t move then he doesn’t need to be behind our porous line.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Wild cat
TJack starts, let PH run some wildcat on them a few times. Favre needs to rest for the second half of the season. If this was the Bills, it’s a different story, but Big Bill will have no mercy. Let’s really see how great chilly self professed SYSTEM is. Let see how smart they are by creating some packages for TJack and Harvin. At least it will give us a chance.
And activat Webb as a reciever on the rosterfor designed wildcat and Spread
spread formations. You got Jax, Webb who can both throw and run like the wind. Toss in Harvin who is a proven reiever and RB, Moss to take 2 guys off coverage, Sank and Jimmy K fn a nodified double TE. Both can block. One dan stretch the middle and the other sure handed for a 1st down.
I say, desin some series of plays to see how Webb, Webb doesn;t rattle. T[hax still hasn’t learned to read blitz and step up in the pocket to buy time.
This may be the time to see if it is really Webb who needs the ball and give him the opportunities Tjax got.
If it is wildcat and nothing works, Og well. Better thanrun run, oass, punt..
Could this be the beginning of Joe Webb? You got 2 fast QB;s with different styles. Who is going to expect it?
by CitrusFLViking on Oct 26, 2010 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions
Why? What would he do better as a wildcat QB
than say Percy Harvin?
by Shawn Gillogly on Oct 27, 2010 3:10 AM CDT up reply actions
With AD, Percy, TJack, Moss.....
I can think of one word———-SPEED. Conjures up images of Mick from Rocky II, pure speed, greased lightning, on and on.
I'd feel better...
If Rosenfels hadn’t been traded. But at least T-Jack can run if protection breaks down.
Overrated by the fans...
… not by the coaches on multiple teams. The coaches on basically every NFL squad know that Sage Rosenfels is not starter material. Better than Tavaris Jackson? Perhaps, I don’t know. I feel pretty sure that Sage Rosenfels is not substantially better than Jackson.
It never ceases to amaze me how fans who almost never get to see the guy on the bench play, never see him in practice, never see him run the offense, learn the playbook, lead in the huddle, etc., think they know or see something more than the coach who is with the guy practically on a daily basis.
If our coaches really dropped the ball on Rosenfels, he’s be starting somewhere else by now. Someone would figure it out and start him, if he was any good. When you can’t beat out Tavaris Jackson for #2 QB, you aren’t likely to be a great QB.
by HammeroftheGods on Oct 27, 2010 1:39 AM CDT up reply actions
Before Moss/ After Moss
Before we had Randy Moss I might… MIGHT… have argued a bit. OK, probably not. But at least with Moss, it seems a lot more palatable. Why? Because Moss has a history of making mediocre QBs look great. Culpepper/ Cassel being good examples. And he’ll probably get more passes too, as TJack will be less likely to ‘panic’ as Favre has done on a number of times.
If we’re going to bench Favre, we have to bench Favre. No ‘take the first snap’ crap. That will put an asterisk on his streak, and no one likes ‘buts’. In all honesty it’s a super human feat that he’s gotten to this point, and NO ONE is going to break it- particularly with the new concussion rules. (Favre wouldn’t have gotten this far with those rules in place all along.) There’s just no shame in it at this point- he’s 41, has tendenitis in his throwing elbow, 2 fractures in an ankle that was surgically repaired in the offseason; and hell, who even knows what they AREN’T reporting- really, at this point, it’s almost a glorious way to end the streak. They’ll always say, “Just look how much it took to finally bring the iron man down.” That’s a LOT better than, “Well, he had X amount of starts, BUT several of them in the last year of his career were simply first-snaps and out…”.
Randy Moss
If Moss can make UFL QB Daunte Culpepper and a washed up Randall Cunningham MVP candidates, surely he can make Jackson an at least passable QB while Brett gets healthy. Maybe he shocks the world and makes Brett an after thought instead. Now’s the time to find out.
Ok, sorry but going to have to say this about panicking
You think Favre is panicking in the pocket? Do you remember TJ playing? When he had a hint of presure he would run around like a chicken with his head cut off. I once saw him run in a full circle before anyone had broken into the pocket. Hop passes, shoe string passes… This is going to be one ugly game.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
And even uglier if Brett gets the start.
I almost feel sorry for the old man.
It's been ugly all year Grime.
I know your misgivings about TJ but look on the bright side. At least TJ is physically able to run around like a chicken instead of only being able to chuck up ducks like Favre : )
by CanadianViking on Oct 27, 2010 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions
All about winning
The last 16 with Favre the Vikings are 6-10.
Yeah it’s time to turn to the backup.
Good Work Ted
You know all these things are running through Brett’s mind as well and I know Chilly must be considering all the pros/cons also, and I have faith in our coaching staff to make the right decision that will benefit the team this weekend and through the playoffs. I want Brett at the helm for the playoffs and if that means we rest him now and trust TJ to get er done then let it be.
"Skol Vikings! Let's win this game Skol Vikings!
by DaRange on Oct 26, 2010 2:08 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
Thanks for Trolling Chuck!
We probably deserve a little razzing after sweeping the Pack last year. If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out has usually been my motto. We got beat, and we have a chance to redeem ourselves at home. The nanner-nanner crowd doesn’t really bother me.
Regarding the Tjack vs Favre question…I’ve pretty much been talking myself into it all week. Rationalizing the reasons that TJack gives us a better option right now while Favre is struggling with injury and dick-related issues. I’ve never been a TJack “hater” but have never been sold on him either.
I think the mobility is the key factor. But unless TJack has really learned to see what defenses are about to throw at him, he’ll still wind up panicking and throwing off his back foot. He even stated “I’m not Brett, he sees things that I miss, but I bring my own style and my own game”. Not exactly words of encouragement, when what I’ve seen of his “style” is usually a deer-in-the-headlights look followed up by a jumping-backward pass at the foot of a receiver.
The Pats are going to be bringing the house regardless of who is under center. With Favre they will be looking to tear his foot off, with TJack they will just be pressuring him into mistakes and mis-reads. The 3-4 does very well in disguising where the pressure will be coming from.
I voted for TJack in the poll. But to be perfectly candid, I really don’t know who gives us the best chance to win. And that’s not a good reaction, heading into week 8.
TJack looked good at the end of 2008 after Gus got hurt
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d80d4eaf8/WK-15-Tarvaris-Jackson-highlights
He just tried to run too much later in the Wildcard game, and kept fumbling the ball.
There was a lot more to that wildcard game...
He never had any time, the line wasn’t holding up and the Eagles were sending blitz after blitz and we kept nobody back to give him enough time to make the throw.
We were simply outcoached.
Tjack could have played better, sure. But a QB can’t perform without time or receivers.
Not to mention
How badly the Eagles beat up on the more seasoned Eli Manning the following week. Everyone looks at the Philly game in a bubble, but no young QB’s did well that postseason and the Eagles defense was annihilating people.
We lost that game because of Kevin Williams
He had a straight shot on McNabb and he just tripped on air and that was the play that Westbrook got that little screen pass and ran for like 50 yards and was the game winning TD…that was a pretty sloppy game by both teams and to say T-Jack sucked so bad that game, well so did McNabb so you cant blame it all on T-Jack
If Favre is injured, don't keep the streak alive for the streak's sake.
Nobody’s breaking that thing. If the streak factors into the decision at all, I’ll be extremely upset.
After reading Peter King’s mailbag column today, it sounds like the injuries aren’t as bad as we all perceive “fractures” to be. That said, if Favre is hobbled physically or mentally by the injury, it’s T-Jax Time all the way.
I’ve never been a big fan of Jackson, but if he can just steer the ship and reduce all the mistakes, I think we might be OK with him.
Proud contributor to Daily Norseman and SB Nation Minnesota
by Eric J. Thompson on Oct 26, 2010 2:20 PM CDT reply actions
How hard can it be to
dump it 5 yards to percy,moss, shank, or hand to AP?
by Jepp The Viking on Oct 26, 2010 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions
100% agreed that the team is more important than the streak...
A friend of mine told me a few days ago, and I don’t have time to look it up right now, that hypothetically Peyton Manning, if he were to play 5 or 6 more years could get close to Favre’s record ( if he doesn’t miss a game obviously.) Am I way off? I’m sure not trying to start anything, that’s for sure!
The streak is great, but......
Jim Marshall’s streak of 281 is superior to Favre’s, without question. Every play, for 281 straight games, he slammed his body into someone. That surpasses a QBs streak, hands down.
No arguments here.
Proud contributor to Daily Norseman and SB Nation Minnesota
by Eric J. Thompson on Oct 26, 2010 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions
one of the best
JM started 270 consecutive games, and played in 282 consecutive games just to be picky (sorry had him on my bedroom wall as a kid). And why the hell isn’t he in the HOF!!!!!!!!!!!!
Because of the idiotic notion...
that because Page and Eller are already in, somehow, it would be unfair to add him also. Idiotic.
It's the infamous wrong way run
When you say “Jim Marshall” in Minnesota, they talk about the Purple People Eaters, the streak, and of course how much of a beast he was.
Mention him anywhere else in the country and you’ll get, “wasn’t he that guy who ran a fumble the wrong way?”
Funny how one bad play can overshadow a spectacular career
"Baseball is the only major sport that appears backward in a mirror" ~George Carlin
by thewild_viking_twins on Oct 27, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions
true
can’t believe that BS-espn had Dion Sanders- i couldn’t tackle my grandmother ahead of Page in the best 100. UnFFFF&&(&&_
believable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He was rate over Chuck Bednarik. are you kidding me??? I saw film of him and he was the guy that almost took Frank G head off (way before my time)…Jezzzzzzzzzzzzz
The disrespect for the Vikings goes back generations apparently.
Sanders was/is a self promoter as well as a great cover corner. Page was a player.
Hype
Give me someone like HOF Rod W. or going back, Bobby Bryant any day, day in and day out. Sure DS had some great days, but IMO, he is not in the top 100 nor is he HOF material. I believe you need to earn it, and not hype it.
NFL network my bad
No he isn’t even rated. Your right, he was excellent. Most people forget (not on this site) how great they were in the 70’s. If we would have won 1. the talk would be different but that is the life of a viking fan. Check out the link. Who the hell voted for this??? I thought BS espn was bad, but come on man. http://top100.nfl.com/
Paul Krause and Jim Marshall
Two of the greatest ever to play. If all of these Johnny-Come -Lately defensive backs are so good, then why is Paul still the all-time interceptions with 81? As for Jim, this guy should have been in the HOF years ago. C’mon Committee, vote the guy in! It would be a damn shame to see him finally get in after he’s gone like some of these other guys that have been dead 30 years or more.
+70
The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota
"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."
"Pull your 84 jerseys out, man. I think this is going to be a fun ride." Randy Moss, WR, Minnesota Vikings
Jackson
As much as I don’t trust the guys ability to win a game, Favre needs to sit for a while, streak be damned.
Let Favre rest, get comfortable with the receivers while letting Jackson take the snaps for a few games and then turn him loose. I think we will see a much different QB if we can do that. Hopefully our defense will be good enough to win us a few games in the meantime. If not, our season is done.
The Minnesota Vikings - Undefeated in the Playoffs at Lambeau Field!
No
I think he has more pride than that, if nothing else. And he would only cheapen what is truly a real, significant accomplishment. He’s rarely ever played hurt, and not been effective (excpetion might be those last games with the Jets). Some of his most incredible games have come the week after injuries that looked like they might have knocked him out (esp the season with the broken thumb). Just handing off and then sitting would diminish all that.
Favre should sit himself
Brett Favre is a guy with a sense of honor (and a huge dick, did you see that photo?). I think he’ll sit himself out rather than hurt the team by playing below his capabilities just to keep his streak alive. That would be an expensive display of personal vanity. And it won’t get him any closer to Jenn Sterger’s hypnotic breasts.
Start T-Jack
because I’m a fan!!! plus yea, Brett needs a little vacation with the bench.
☠★☪My dream, is to see the Minnesota Vi♛s win a superbowl. USA- the land were dreams come true. ☀ ツ This is our ۩۩house۩
by UnBannedVikingholic on Oct 26, 2010 3:03 PM CDT reply actions
You know..
There is one thing I will agree that will bother me if Favre doesn’t start this Sunday..
The Packers fans…. The ones who got bad officiating to help them win. In return, that particular game is also the game that finally put Favre on a bench for a game or two or three. I can’t see Favre letting that happen.
Taking that into consideration.. I believe he may try his best to play (if possible)…
How good is Favre with a broken ankle?
Still better than T-Jack? How about when New England blitzes him all day long? Will Favre be able to elude rushers that know his ankle is busted?
Let’s be realistic. If Favre does start, he’ll be absolutely ineffective, and most likely will make his ankle injuries worse. It’s possible he will hand a few balls off to AP, then step out for TJ. But play the whole game? Not a chance.
Best thing is to let old Brett sit down for five or six weeks, then hope he can end the season with a few good games.
I hereby declare the Brett Favre experiment officially over.
That’s right, I feel official.
I was never saying he is starting material..
I am one of the bigger Favre fans on this board..
Hell, if sitting him 2 weeks helps this team, than I am all for it.
No reason to let him get injured even more.
I do expect to see him take another snap again as a Viking.. Just not sure which game. (Could even be the Patriots… But, I’ll be biting my lip if that happens).
On a side note, going w/ T-jack gives the Pats no idea how to game plan for this up-coming game.
true
If BF was making all the throws, then I would feel better, but he has been off. It’s not just the short game. It seems like he can’t throw like last year, so I think even before the latest injury, that his leg(s) have been a issue. Sit him foe a couple of games, make the coaching staff and TJ EARN their paychecks.
I hereby declare the Brett Favre experiment officially over.
That’s right, I feel official.
Get this man a zebra-shirt!
:)
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
by DCPurple on Oct 27, 2010 8:41 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Poll should have included Joe Webb
True, Joe Webb is made of proto-matter, so his behavior in a game situation is unpredictable. But he is also a super-athlete, far more talented than T-Jack.
Think of it this way: If so many people think T-Jack’s not good enough to win games, then why not start the super-talented rookie? Why not give the new kid a chance to shock the world?
We’ve already seen what T-Jack can do (stare down receivers, throw hard but slightly off line, run medium fast in a straight line), and what he can’t do (look off defensive backs, pump fake, then complete a pass). Next Sunday is our chance to find out if Joe Webb is just as bad as T-Jack, or maybe that he’s actually better. From his performances in pre-season, I think he’ll be better. In fact, I think Joe Webb has a chance to be a Randall Cunningham-type quarterback. Wouldn’t you love to find out?
It's just too soon
That’s where we went wrong with T-Jack as a rookie, rushing him into an overwhelming role…But we don’t know what we have in the New TJack, the one that has sat behind Favre this long.
☠★☪My dream, is to see the Minnesota Vi♛s win a superbowl. USA- the land were dreams come true. ☀ ツ This is our ۩۩house۩
by UnBannedVikingholic on Oct 26, 2010 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions
NO!
The New England Patriots may be the worst team ever to start an unproven rookie QB (who barely avoided becoming a WR) against. They have a genius head coach and a very aggressive style of defense.
Remember, Webb looked awesome in the preseason against mostly special teams and waiver fodder players. That’s a long ways from a Bill Belichick run Patriots team.
by Cobra312004 on Oct 26, 2010 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1 on this
BIG +1. It’s unfortuante that this will have to be TJacks first meaningful play in two years. Especially since Favre proved two years ago in Foxboro with Jets that his experience and savvy could trump the wily gameplanning of that defense. Favre had one of the smartest, most perfect games of his entire career that night. Seriously, watch a replay sometime if you get the chance.
But it is what it is. But lets not make it worse for ourselves by putting Webb in there (my god, I can’t believe I’m even taking this idea seriously enough to comment on it. For me, it would be grounds to fire Chilli as bieng incompetent only if he DID start Webb, not that he didn’t).
Nobody...
… is going to play hard for Joe Webb. You think guys are going to catch a ball over the middle for a raw rookie like Webb? I hope the kid makes it, but right now Jackson is the only other guy on the team that can get guys to play.
by HammeroftheGods on Oct 26, 2010 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions
You have to be kidding...
If they are that petty, then they would not have made it to the NFL.
They are professionals, they play to win the game. It does not matter if Webb is young, he just needs to complete a few passes and everyone will be onboard.
But, I don’t think we should start him.
Yeah they will..
.. be that “petty”. When guys go over the middle their career might end on any play.
When you turn the light on, the cockroaches all scurry around. You find out guys start thinking only about themselves when they give up hope. For example, injuries they’d otherwise play with keep them out of the game.
by HammeroftheGods on Oct 26, 2010 5:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Really?
Oh dear how embarrassing!
I hope I’m not the first person to engage in speculation in a fan website. Geez, how humiliating.
by HammeroftheGods on Oct 27, 2010 1:42 AM CDT up reply actions
And it is no different with a struggling old man under center.
You think they are going to act any different considering the chances Favre is giving them?
It is all about winning, if Webb was to give them the best shot at winning you can be damned sure they would play their heart out.
Well yeah true...
… if they lose faith in Favre, then they are going to play differently. If they lose faith in each other, the whole dynamic is different. The average NFL player thinks about themselves most of the time, which comes as a shock to some people but I find perfectly natural.
When teammates don’t help you succeed, or put you in danger of getting your career ended, guys think about self-preservation before wins.
My point, whoever they play, once they lose faith in the QB, or in the coach or the team in general, the whole situation changes.
Yeah, if Joe Webb gives them a better chance than Tavaris Jackson and Brett Favre, by all means start him.
But, I just can’t believe that the guys are going to feel better about Joe Webb than about Tavaris Jackson. Not at this point. Despite Joe Webb’s promise, there must be some reason he is #3 on the depth chart.
by HammeroftheGods on Oct 26, 2010 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
If so many people think T-Jack’s not good enough to win games, then why not start the super-talented rookie? Why not give the new kid a chance to shock the world?
Because he is not ready.
The adjustment from the college level to the NFL for a QB is not a quick one. Heck, there are guys from Pro-Style offenses that take years to adjust. Imagine what it will take Webb coming from UAB?
That is exactly the reason Tjack performed under his expectations. He was thrown in too early.
The reason you remember him staring down receivers, not looking off defenders and the like is because he was not ready. Webb would be in the same boat.
By the way… Tjack has shown that he is able to look off defenders and did it well at the end of 2008. He may not have the wiggle of a RB, but he can make people miss in space.
We will find out about Webb, but to try it now would be foolhardy.
Seriously?
Joe Webb is just T-jack with less experiance, that is an awful game plan
Yeah and if...
… I saw a train wreck about to happen I’d keep watching too. I wouldn’t be able to look away, anyhow.
by HammeroftheGods on Oct 26, 2010 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions
The time has come...
This is it. This is Jackson’s last shot as a Viking.
Ted can tell you, I’ve been a Jackson supporter since day 1. Through all the difficulty and struggles (which really weren’t all that bad when you look at the numbers), I have stood by my belief that Jackson can be an effective starter in this league. Maybe he will never be a Pro Bowler but you don’t need one to win a Super Bowl.
I won’t get into all of the legitimate reasons Jackson has struggled early in his career here, I’ll just say this: Jackson deserves to start.
For all of his problems, we have plenty of knowns about him that are very encouraging when compared to a “healthy” Brett Favre that we’ve had the last several weeks. We know he won’t get smoked like Favre does sitting motionless in the pocket. We know he can scramble and (unlike Brett) he can throw the ball away when he needs to. We know his mobility makes blitzing him more risky than blitzing Brett since it opens up space behind the line if he scrambles. We know he protects the ball better than Brett has this year (who doesn’t though at this point…ok besides Jay Cutler). That was comparing a healthy Brett to Jackson…and now Brett has a broken ankle…
TJ has won some games
We should also keep in mind that Jackson has in fact won some football games, and that the supporting cast at that time was not as good as today’s. With AP to hand the ball to, with Moss, Schiancoe and the great Bernard Berrian to throw to, with Percy Havin buzzing all over the field, T-Jack has plenty of backfield talent to help him out. And with Sidney Rice coming back soon, it will be all the sweeter to see T-Jack running this Cadillac of an offense.
Or not…
Rice
Look, we should admit that sidney will only come back and I mean ready to play by December, and only if we are in position for the playoffs. If he comes back, it’s gravy, but I like what I saw sunday night. Hell even BB caught a nice ball. I guess BF will start and Chilly will end up pulling him after two series because he will be ineffective. TJ is in his fifth year, this is the year that used to be the breakout year for most QB’s back in the day. Has he learned by watching? I think so, at least how to manage the game better. Hell at least he’s been in the same system for those five years.
One more thing
It saddens me to write this but another reason this is a great game for Jackson to start is because it’s an away game. If we were at home, the boo birds would come out after the first 3 and out series. The Vikings fans have always held Jackson to a high standard and have been quick to turn on him. Playing on the road may be the best thing for his psyche in his first significant game action in a year and a half.
well that and in all reality no one would expect him to win it anyway...
however I think this might be a situation that Childress is milking to get Favre out of the starting job.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Oh boy, the plot thickens
Favre’s ankle fractures not such a big deal after all
There’s a misconception out there right now that Brett Favre is so significantly hurt that it’d be a huge longshot for him to play Sunday in the Vikings’ vital game at New England.
In the wake of the news that Favre has two significant injuries to his left foot and ankle, I spoke with a top NFL team orthopedist, who said not only is it realistic to think Favre will play Sunday, but also that if this were a playoff game, most quarterbacks in the league would very likely play with what Favre has.
It’s always dangerous to ask a doctor about a patient he has not seen, so take what this ortho says with a grain of salt. (I talked with him with the agreement that I wouldn’t identify him.) "I think it’s extremely misleading to say he has two ankle fractures and leave that impression,‘’ the orthopedist said. "Technically, with what I have read, he does. But you are not playing an NFL game with two fractures in the sense that we think of fractures.’’
I still think he should sit (though King thinks not). If it were a playoff game, I woluld probably agree he should play, but it isnot, so I don’t. Sorry Brett.
ok i agree with you that Favre should sit
but if we loose the game against NE with T-Jack ( not an automatic win guarantee) at the helm, what are we going to do then?
let him try again against the cardinals
and if that does not go well … then go back to brett, see if he is healed up a bit, and then bring him back for hte divisional games against chicago and GB again (I posted this plan all in more detail yesterday in comments to an earlier article).
Just a question
If the last touchdown pass actually counted and we won the game, would we still be having this convo?
Yeah, but in a much different context
But it didn’t, and they didn’t, so here we are.
The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota
"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."
"Pull your 84 jerseys out, man. I think this is going to be a fun ride." Randy Moss, WR, Minnesota Vikings
Exactly
Yes, we would. Favre’s completion percentage is atrocious and he is on pace to throw 27 interceptions this year. If we won we’d be happier, and this discussion wouldn’t be as serious. But like Ted said, things didn’t bounce that way and so here we are.
No, we'd be having this conversation a week later
Look, win or lose this year, Favre has been HORRIBLE. I am not being a “hater” or exaggerating. Look at the numbers. Here are some eye-opening stats:
1) In every single game this year, Favre has as many or more turnovers (INTs + Fumbles lost) than TDs. Every game.
2) His passer rating is 3rd WORST in the league. Name a bad starter in the league (e.g. Alex Smith, David Gerrard, Jason Campbell, Jay Cutler, etc.). They have been better than Favre this year.
Point is, Favre has straight up lost two games almost by himself this year (Miami and Green Bay) and did NOTHING special (nothing that TJack couldn’t have done better) in the two wins (Detroit and Dallas). Time to cut our losses and move on, for this year AND the future, with Tarvaris Jackson.
I reserve judgement
Until I see Favre walk without a boot.
If he does not practice, I don’t want him on the field Sunday.
WHAT?
Are you seriously thinking about T-Jack? Remember in 2008 when everytime he threw a pass we were worried? I mean, Gus Frerotte was more convincing in the pocket.
Injured Brett Favre gives us much higher probability of winning!
back to the o-line
Look, if BF wasn’t injured on Sunday, I am all in. Hell I am all in every game to the end. That being said, with the new injury, and lack of potential mobility, can we really trust LOADASS!!!!!!. That’s reality. BF hands down is the man, however, he will be a sitting duck out there unless he finds a miracle drug.
This Team needs a spark
I don’t know if Tjoke is that spark, but I would like to see him in the game now that Brett’s ankle is reinjured.
Gus Frerotte LOOKED more convincing in the pocket.
But let’s compare some numbers, shall we?
In 2007, the first year Tjack was the starter, he had some pretty weak recievers in Troy Williamson, Robert Ferguson and Bobby Wade.
He put up 58.2% completion, 9TD’s 12INTs and a mediocre QB rating of 70.8.
In 2008, when Frerrotte took over for Tjack, he had Bernard Berrian, Bobby Wade and Sidney Rice.
Frerotte put up 59.1% completion, 12TDs 15INTs and a mediocre QB rating of 73.7.
So even with better receivers, Frerrrotte did marginally better than Tjack when it was Tjack’s second year starting. Add to that the 260 yards and 3 TD’s rushing, and it is pretty obvious that Tjack was the better QB.
You were simply fooled into thinking Frerrotte was better.
I should clarify...
When I said:
Frerrrotte did marginally better than Tjack when it was Tjack’s second year starting.
I meant: Frerrrotte did marginally better than Tjack when it was Tjack’s second year in the NFL.
Yeah, I seriously am.
If Favre is hurt and can’t put pressure on his left ankle, he will have zero mobility, for one. He will also have a hard, if not impossible time, in pushing off that ankle when he goes to throw the ball.
That will lead to underthrows, which will lead to another miserable Sunday.
The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota
"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."
"Pull your 84 jerseys out, man. I think this is going to be a fun ride." Randy Moss, WR, Minnesota Vikings
Favre is right handed...
Most of the push comes from his right leg. Though it would probably have quite the effect on his follow-through.
Rahter see Webb
in a wildcat with Tpjax. See who comes out shining. They are both athletic and fast, Add Harvin ,AD and shank. Maybe 2 TE with jiinny and shank with Moss drawing doule coverage
by CitrusFLViking on Oct 26, 2010 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions
Remember in 2008
When we were worried every time someone threw to Shiancoe?
Things change. Players change.
p.s. shank's td catch sunday night was insanely awesome...to bad it got robbed by the nfl.
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
T-jacks recent performances in the preseason games
Did anybody watch ? what did you guys think? I watched one game and he looked absolutely horrible …. I know we should not judge based on preseason games but if he can’t make completions in preseason games, how effective will he be in the regular season?
by meno on Oct 26, 2010 5:35 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
It is tough to say.
Tjack was practicing with the first team (which did not include Harvin, Rice, or Moss as they did not attend) from the start of training camp…
Then all of a sudden he is tossing balls to the slappies. It could be a timing issue, but it is really tough to say.
Add to that the fact that he was playing against first team defenses, since Favre only played a series or two, and you can see a few reasons why he might look bad.
preseason doesn't count
And if it does, you should also count the games last year when he played scrub minutes in the 4th quarter and put up a 113 passer rating.
TJack...
seems to me to lack confidence… and I think that is his biggest problem.
Chilly lacks confidence in TJack and proven to go bland with play calling with him at the helm..
BUT…
I think we need his mobility in the pocket OR out of it.
I worry that he will still throw the ball at the feet of his receivers…
but I would love to see him chuck the rainbow to Moss ala Cunningham or Culpepper (h/t to George and Johnson)
I think it is time for TJack and hopefully Favre can show some support and help the kid out.
It’s time… All of the Favre doubters were proven wrong last year… as a Jackson doubter… it’s time for me to be proven wrong. T… if they put you in there… go kick some ass.
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Oct 26, 2010 5:43 PM CDT reply actions
Say we start T-Jack.
Say Webb is his backup.
Say Favre is inactive this week.
Who is our emergency #3*? We do not have a QB on the practice squad. If we make a move on this front, you know they are worried about Brett. In relation to this thread, my opinion is that Favre should sit until his ankle is much healthier.
*I want to make suggestions here, but I can not think of a good match. I would think it would have to be a veteran familiar with Chilly’s system and verbiage.
Your fantasy football expert since Jerry Rice's rookie year.
Donovan McNabb?
Kidding.
If we did reach, we would probably be looking for Frerrotte or Johnson again, maybe even O’Connell or that guy from Louisiana we had in for training camp, Perriloux?
I thought about Frerotte.
But he is probably not even close to being playing shape. Is that Brad Johnson? No. See the Frerotte comment. I am not recalling an O’Connell.
Boller?
Your fantasy football expert since Jerry Rice's rookie year.
Jeff Garcia
Just throwing that name out there, lol
The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota
"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."
"Pull your 84 jerseys out, man. I think this is going to be a fun ride." Randy Moss, WR, Minnesota Vikings
I always thought he would have been a good fit.
But that was years ago. Weinke? LOL.
I say we sign Joe Mauer. Watch Gardy lose it.
Your fantasy football expert since Jerry Rice's rookie year.
Favre should get some advice from George Blanda :)
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
That would be like Forrest Gump
outsmarting Steven Hawking in a debate.
Ain’t…happening.
The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota
"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."
"Pull your 84 jerseys out, man. I think this is going to be a fun ride." Randy Moss, WR, Minnesota Vikings
Nice piece.
But you don’t need a win in New England. It would be nice to get one, sure, but you don’t need to. Here’s the deal as I see it:
New England: Loss 2-5
Arizona: Win, 3-5
Chicago: Win 4-5
Green Bay: Win 5-5 (Might be close, but you’re at home, so…)
Washington: Win 6-5
Buffalo: Win 7-5
Giants: Loss 7-6
Chicago: Win 8-6
Philly: Loss 8-7
Detroit Win 9-7
That’s honestly how I think it plays out from here. After this week, the Giants, Philly, the Packers and the Skins are your toughest games left, and I see a split at worst in those games. The rest I see as wins. 9-7 might be enough to win the NFC north this year, and if it’s not, it probably leaves you in the wild card hunt in the mediocre NFC. Find a way to beat New England (though I doubt you will) or take 3 of 4 of the games noted above, and you’ve got 10 wins and certainly a playoff berth. you should be buried in the division and the conference, but you’re not, and you’re team is still playing well enough that I doubt it will happen.
BCB free since 8/24/10 and happier for it.
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Oct 26, 2010 6:38 PM CDT reply actions
Not a Tjack fan
But he might be the best chance to win. Favre has had very little chemistry with the receivers, and now that he is injured, Tarvaris might be the kick in the pants this offense needs.
Webb
As you see I want to at least see Webb. What have we got to lose. They ready their D for Jax and then bring the kid in, then some wildcat with a spped machine Webb, Jax and Harvin add AD and Moss to the equasion and it could mean trouble for Pats.
They got lost when Miami ran it
by CitrusFLViking on Oct 26, 2010 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions
UM "the cool breeze"
You hate T-jack for reasons unknown but prefer an injured turnover prone Favre to lead this team as of RIGHT NOW, with a healthy mobile qb behind him who POSSIBLY has something to prove? Do you remember the last time T-JACK came off the bench when the qb ahead of him got injured? Umm, well 4 tds to 0 ints should tell the story. And Yes he Stunk it up in his FIRST EVER playoff game, but so what? It was his FIRST EVER playoff game for somebody from such a small college. Besides he did take this team to the playoffs, now go check those stats “EXPERT”
☠★☪My dream, is to see the Minnesota Vi♛s win a superbowl. USA- the land were dreams come true. ☀ ツ This is our ۩۩house۩
by UnBannedVikingholic on Oct 26, 2010 7:22 PM CDT reply actions
I guess my memory (or my internet search skills) are better than yours...
The last time TJack came off the bench to replace an injured QB was Wk 14 of `08, against a Detroit team that would go on to lose 16 games that season. Minny won 20-16, TJack went 8-10 for 105 and 1 TD. The Vikes had 3 games remaining after this, and won 2, the 1 loss to the Falcons in which TJack lost 2 of the 4 fumbles lost by the Vikes, this being at home.
TJack essentially started 5 games that season, losing 3 of them. He SUCKED in the playoff game.
For those stating that Favre has had more weapons that TJack ever has, check the box score of that HOME playoff failure: Peterson, Rice, Shiancoe, Rice, Taylor, Kleinsasser… save for Harvin and now Moss, not much different, is it?
by San Diego Viking on Oct 27, 2010 5:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Well when you put it that way
Peterson, Rice, Shiancoe, Rice, Taylor, Kleinsasser
Having two Sindey Rice’s probably helps.
But seriously, yes it is horribly different. Besides the fact that Harvin and Moss are our two best WR’s right now…
Rice in 2008 had all of 15 catches and was healthy for maybe 3 games that year? He’s not nearly the caliber WR he is now after spending the following offseason working out with Marion Barber, Chris Carter and Larry Fitzgerald (to name a few). In fact, most fans had written him off already and were hoping to pick up a “real #1” WR heading into the 2009 free agency and draft.
And Bobby Wade was so good he started all of 6 games for the 4-12 Kansas City Chiefs last year and couldn’t make the Redskins final roster this year.
Bernard Berrian has all of 7 catches in 6 games this year.
The last time TJack came off the bench to replace an injured QB was Wk 14 of `08, against a Detroit team that would go on to lose 16 games that season. Minny won 20-16, TJack went 8-10 for 105 and 1 TD.
You also neglect to mention that when Jackson took over in the Detroit game, we were losing 6-3 at halftime (to that eventual 0-16 team) and had been incredibly inefficient on offense (led by two interceptions from Frerotte). Jackson then lead us on 3 scoring drives in the second half to come from behind and win.
So your blaming TJack's failures on the WR's... oy vey...
Please spare me…. If Rice sucked so bad in 08, how could Favre make him an All-Pro in 09… oh wait, maybe he just needed a GOOD QB… and we’ ve had Moss for all of 2 weeks… so the only difference is Harvin over Wade… I’ll give you that one… but c’mon, do you remember how you felt in 08 at all?
I know 2 things I felt: A) I wanted Ferotte back in ASAP after he got healthy 2) Every time Jackson snapped the ball, I assumed the worst would happen. I admit, I feel the same way about Favre right now (that the worst will happen), but I also recognize that the best that can happen is a hell of a lot better than the best that can happen with TJack.
If Favre is hurt and CAN’T play, I’m OK with TJack. But if Favre can play, he should PLAY.
by San Diego Viking on Oct 27, 2010 11:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Not blaming his play on the receivers
Just pointing out that he had vastly inferior receiving options to what we are currently deploying. You’re essentially comparing Berrian and Wade to Moss and Harvin. And I don’t really care if we’ve only had Moss for 3 1/2 weeks, he’s the best receiver of his generation.
Rice sucked so bad in ‘08 because it was his second year in the league and he battled injuries the entire season. It had nothing to do with the quality of QB. Rice buckled down after that season and, in his words “became a professional”. He worked harder in the offseason than ever before because he said he finally realized he couldn’t skate on ability anymore. Sidney Rice in 09 was a totally different receiver than 08, no matter who was throwing him the ball.
As for how I felt in 08, you’re appealing to an emotion that was never there. Ask Ted (we were at training camp together Jackson’s rookie year), I’ve been a supporter of Tarvaris Jackson since day 1and have always preached patience with him. I was against benching him in the first place and was very excited to see him play so well when Frerotte went down.
I firmly believe that he has learned a lot from sitting behind Favre for the last year and a half and I think he gives us the best chance to win on Sunday. Especially if Favre misses practice tomorrow too, I think he needs to sit.
SD, shall we rehash Brett's #'s from THIS season?
You know, the one that matters most?
Sidney Rice was not NEARLY the player in his rookie year that he is now.
So even putting him in the conversation does not mean anything.
The Eagles were the #3 ranked Pass defense, and Eli Manning (a potential MVP candidate this year who had 2 more years experience as an NFL starter) did much worse than Tjack against them.
Firstly, that’s a really well written and thorough breakdwon of the current sitch… much better than reading mis-spelled diatribes scribed by morons. Everything you said is accurate. My father in law said something funny to me on Monday that for me kind of captured this entire thing for me, he said “Is Childress allowed to bench Favre or can Favre do what he wants?” I asked him if he was kidding. He wasn’t. I replied that of course Chilly could sit Favre, he’s the coach. Then I began thinking about this season and it struck me that perhaps there was some validity to that. One would think by watching the FAVRE show that Favre can do what he wants. I’m a giant Brett Favre fan and I’m afraid to say that I’m becomming dis-illusioned. Last year he went into manager mode and started really following the script… granted he had Rice but still, he threw fewer picks and became a disciplined role player. We saw that one outburst when Chilly was going to sit him and Favre went back out and we all thought “Wow, Favre is the BOSS” Then cut to this year where they send men to beg him. What kind of message did that send? So then we cut to the Green Bay game and Favre is the boss. People say that no matter what, Favre gives you a chance… yes, and so do other quarterbacks. Percy Harvin is a speed monster and you’ve got the most explosive back in the game. If Favre is not willing to manage then he should sit. I hate to say that but it’s not the Minnesota FAVRES, it’s the Minnesota Vikings. Jackson can play tight and throw some safe balls and make it happen in New England. I don’t mention the sexting situation because it’s not football and it’s irrelevant to me. Dan Marino played with a ski-boot on his foot for the last year of his career and maybe Favre will have to. He needs to sit… be happy with his consecutive games record (which everyone respects and nobody will beat) and heal. See a therapist, do some yoga and some introspection. Then he can come in for the last 7 or 8 games and light it up. If the train is broken, stop it and fix it and then carry on. BE THE COACH, CHILLY!!!!!
Yeah, but
Chilly ceded, in many ways, whatever authority he had over this team when he sent Allen, Longwell, and Hutch down to MS. Look, I thought it was a good move. As long as the Vikes win, Chilly’s a genius. It worked last year, there was no turnover in personnel in terms of starters, and it was a team that was thisclose to going to the SB. Hell, if I had been him I would’ve sent more than three guys, but about the only thing I’m qualified to be is a village idiot.
The nightmare scenario was what we’re seeing. If I’m on the team, I don’t give a hoot in hell how much of a raise you give a guy, I don’t care that you put off contract extensions, and I don’t care if Favre sent cock shots to a co-ed when he was on a different team.
As long as we’re winning, it’s worth it. When you’re not winning, the paradigm shifts.
The paradigm is shifting, and the only way to stop it is to win.
The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota
"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."
"Pull your 84 jerseys out, man. I think this is going to be a fun ride." Randy Moss, WR, Minnesota Vikings
Ask yourself this...
If T-Jack had started the season because Favre didn’t come back – would he have thrown the ball as poorly as Favre has so far? Is there anything that Favre has done in those two wins that T-Jack can’t possible do?
The only reason there is even a debate about this is because of how poorly the Vikings have been coached this year.
sad to say...
I have to think that we’d have at least 2 more wins if T-Jack is the starter.
by Shawn Gillogly on Oct 26, 2010 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions
check this blog out...
http://www.rivercitysportsblog.com/
this guy is on to something, the league is fishy….lots of money in sports gambling and there is no reason to not believe scott green was not in with some money on the pack…like tim donahey in the NBA, why not point shave in the NFL too. think about it, makes a whole lot of sense to me.
Bench Jared and WEB comes from the Bench to play
Bench Jared Allan because he is really stinking up the place. They can run and pass to his side whenever they want because they know where he will be looping 7-10 past the QB.
WEB will play because TJ has never shown he can stay healthy and while the WR are better than what he had before, the line is worse and TJ still has not figured out anything with pocket pressure or how to take 3,5,7, foot drops and be in the same place each time. The man is horrible and has not really tried to get better. New York needed a BU QB they traded for SAGE, I hope he proves me wrong on all accounts. Chilli was asked why he traded SAGE and not TJ and he said "there were no trade offers for TJ. HELLOOO GET A CLUE. Don’t feel sorry for TJ either he has made a lot of money pretending to a QB.
Thank you ZZ
Go for broke. Light the fire
by CitrusFLViking on Oct 26, 2010 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions
Just because Jared Allen is getting all the attention, due to Pat's decline
does not mean he is stinking up the place. Maybe you should look at the WHOLE picture, rather than just what stands out.
And your evaluation of Tjack is laughable.
Firstly, we are so far from buried at 2-5 it’s not even funny. After New England we’ve got a slate of winnable games; alright, so it’d be a big hole, but like others have said the NFC’s so wide open this year it certainly wouldn’t be game over. And I do think we’ll be 2-5 after this weekend—and 7-5 after the first week in December. An 8-8 team is making the NFC playoffs this year. Maybe two 8-8 teams, like in 2004.
Secondly, it’s Super Bowl or bust. Favre’s still our best shot. I actually like Tarvaris Jackson, but I’d still rather us roll with Brett. Call me crazy. But then ago, who’d you rather have facing down the Pats’ blitz? Not to mention throwing against that suspect secondary?
Maybe we won’t be 2-5…
I don't want Favre facing down the Pats' blitz.
Not with the way our line has been playing and how much of a statue Favre will be back there.
I can see I’m definitely in the minority , but I saw some things I really liked.
Th O line seems to have jelled. Farve got pretty good protection, the holes were there for AP. The offense was the best we’ve seen it at this year… hey we went into a half actually leading.
The ankle worries me a lot. However Dallas has MUCH better D line than the Pats. Our O line should be able to handle them. Given the truly encouraging signs they offense gave, I’m not convinced it’s time to give up. Last quarter of Jets game, this game showed an offense that is beginning to work well. Why quit now?
If the docs say he’s good to go. If Brett says he wants to go, start him, give him a quarter to see if we can build on the good line play etc… if not then change it up, but not now when things might be starting to work
A.s you read
I keep calling for Webb. If I were coordinator I would keep the name buzzing in Chilly’s ear til he hears it
We can’t play Brett if we expect anything from him in the future. So toss some things in there to make it fun and catch Pats off guard
WEBB
by CitrusFLViking on Oct 26, 2010 11:57 PM CDT reply actions
Ok but...
… if they fire Bevell, you aren’t #2 on my list for coordinator.
by HammeroftheGods on Oct 27, 2010 1:30 AM CDT up reply actions
And Citrus you keep ignoring
the minor issue of who will be the #3 QB if that happens. Learn the rules before you advocate something as dumb as putting our starting QB under center for a WR option pass.
by Shawn Gillogly on Oct 27, 2010 3:24 AM CDT up reply actions
Dink and Dunk........................................
Please bring the preasure, New England!
Simply dink and dunk, until u see your opportunity to go deeper.
Brett Favre is the Greatest QB in NFL History, Bar None!
Brett Favre will be back in 2010, Guaranteed!
Brett Favre will lead the Vikings to a Victory in Super Bowl XLV, Guaranteed!
Brett Favre in 2011 is inevitable!
Just saying here
but Joe Webb will not start a single game this year, or next (assuming there will be football next year)
he has great potential, but he’s no where near starting material, especially on a contending team. He’s a prospect.
If this were baseball, he’d probably be at the AA level of the minors
"Baseball is the only major sport that appears backward in a mirror" ~George Carlin
by thewild_viking_twins on Oct 27, 2010 12:38 PM CDT reply actions
I would hope so...
But Chilly has done some stupid things in the past… Like starting Tjack his rookie year when he should have been in AA minors.
Favre Sunday
Sure seem to be plenty of rats jumping ship. Best chance to win Sunday is with Favre-period. Hurt he is still better than many starting Q.B.’s and certainly better than non-starters. So many hasbeens and wannabes grabbing onto anything to show their petty Favre-hate. Viking fans wanting to dump Favre will most certainly come to realize that mistake the same time he stops playing.
How is
Wanting to sit him on the bench until he is healthy enough to lead this team, (which he hasn’t done so far), considered “DUMPING” him? Yea dude, you really need to gain more comprehension skills.
☠★☪My dream, is to see the Minnesota Vi♛s win a superbowl. USA- the land were dreams come true. ☀ ツ This is our ۩۩house۩
by UnBannedVikingholic on Oct 27, 2010 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions
Comprehension skills
Something you will need alot of when you come to understand you sink or swim with Favre.
Not!
The teams comes first not Favre. Why don’t you understand that?
☠★☪My dream, is to see the Minnesota Vi♛s win a superbowl. USA- the land were dreams come true. ☀ ツ This is our ۩۩house۩
by UnBannedVikingholic on Oct 27, 2010 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions
This isn't fantasy football
It’s not like drafting Chris Johnson #1 overall and then being completely screwed if he gets injured.
I’m sick of people saying sink or swim with Favre. I don’t see starting Favre as more important than keeping our head above water.
Besides
At least TJack HAVE went through training camp with this team and HAVE gotten 1st string reps in practice, so he should be HEALTHY and good to go.
☠★☪My dream, is to see the Minnesota Vi♛s win a superbowl. USA- the land were dreams come true. ☀ ツ This is our ۩۩house۩
by UnBannedVikingholic on Oct 27, 2010 8:29 PM CDT up reply actions
Joe Webb
I agree Webb should have been in the starting QB poll.
Brad drafted TJack ahead of the Chargers starting Tackle. He started as a rookie the year LD was All-World. Since Brad let Sage go his job now depends on TJack. It serves him right.
I thought Farve played so well last year because it wasn’t his team. It was AP’s team so the pressure wasn’t on him. That’s not the case now. Everyone now knows we go to the Super Bowl only with Farve.
alan bailey
I thought Farve played so well last year because it wasn’t his team. It was AP’s team so the pressure wasn’t on him. That’s not the case now. Everyone now knows we go to the Super Bowl only with Farve.
No, he played so well because he had the weapons to do so. That and we got lucky having a much easier 1st half of the season than this year.
Now that Favre is already beat up as much as he was after the NFCCG last year, we are looking at a steady drop in effectiveness as he loses mobility.
Agreed
If it was Peterson’s team and there was no pressure on Favre last year, why did he throw for 4,200 yards while Peterson had statistically the worst year of his career?
The weapons helped but Favre played out his mind. That was easily his best season, and I’ve watched pretty much every one of his other seasons. He didn’t force stuff like he did quite a bit throughout his career.
by packallday555 on Oct 28, 2010 8:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Being able to lean on AP Certainly helped out a lot.
You can see some desperation in Favre when he is on the field lately. It seems like we have been getting an abnormal number of bad breaks as well.
But that is football.
You make me laugh
Brad drafted TJack ahead of the Chargers starting Tackle.
Wow, this is so wrong it’s laughable. Marcus McNeill was drafted 50th overall (which was a joke itself, the guy should have been a 1st round pick), Jackson was drafted 64th. It’s not even close. But hey, it’s not like you could easily look that up.
According to some
You need a HOF qb to have an effective team.
☠★☪My dream, is to see the Minnesota Vi♛s win a superbowl. USA- the land were dreams come true. ☀ ツ This is our ۩۩house۩
by UnBannedVikingholic on Oct 28, 2010 4:44 PM CDT reply actions
Chilly and Favre
Let me start by saying, I’m not a complete Brad Childress supporter. However, he has worn far too much criticism for his players not executing on the field. He had a game plan that dominated the Saints last year to put the Vikes in the Super Bowl, but the players fumbled religiously and Favre threw the costly interception. As for the quarterbacks, ankle aside, Favre’s horrid play should be enough to justify putting him on the bench and given a hopefully much improved Jackson a chance, but at the end of the day, it is Brett Farve and his resume is enough to give him the benefit of the doubt if he can play and then adjust throughout the game if need be. And in general, it should become Peterson’s team for the foreseeable future to take pressure off whoever the quarterback proves to be.
Chilly
It is hard forget the 12 men on the field penalty in the Saints game that took us out of field goal range. It turned out to be the wrong time to get cute by sending extra men on the field to try and confuse the other team.
alan bailey

by 


























