Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How The Kings Beat The Coyotes: Lather, Rinse, Repeat

The One Where Ted Kicks The Vikings QB Bee's Nest


As enjoyable as the Tuesday Night domination of the Philadelphia Eagles was, I couldn't help but think ahead towards next year, as wunderkind Joe Webb made play after play with his feet and arms. 

In some ways, Webb's play was a lifeboat of hope in this Titanic of a season.  His athleticism was not in question coming in to the game, but the general consensus was that he was going to get rolled by a talented and experienced Eagles defense.  It was Webb, however, that did the rolling, with his feet, his arm...and his poise and confidence. 

In other ways, Webb's performance was the worst thing that could've happened to the Vikings as they head into the off-season. 

Wha..WHAT?!

Yeah, it could be the worst thing.  Follow my reasoning, after the jump. 

Star-divide

The Vikings personnel guys have a very difficult question they will need to answer as they start to prepare for the draft and free agency:

Who is Joe Webb, really? 

Is he the guy we saw Tuesday, or the guy that was largely lost against Chicago?  Had Webb been Jacksonian (Tarvaris, not Andrew) in his play against the Eagles, the Vikings strategy for the off-season becomes very simple:  get a quarterback, probably very early in the draft, and sign a Gus Frerotte/Sage Rosenfels-type backup to play caretaker and mentor for a year.  Towards the end of the season, give the new guy a few starts (depending on where the Vikes stand in the playoff chase), let him get his sea legs under him, and let him start his hall of fame career in 2012.  Webb's play throws a potential wrench into the plans.  An encouraging wrench, but a wrench nonetheless.

What if Webb is the for real guy we saw on Tuesday?  The Vikings have a lot of issues that need to be addressed on both sides of the ball, and NOT having to draft a QB allows the Vikings to target more areas and gets the roster shored up faster than if they do need a QB.  The offensive line needs an extreme makeover, Pat Williams will need to be replaced, possibly Ray Edwards, possibly Ben Leber, and so help me Odin, if Madieu Williams is wearing purple next year, it better be with the Baltimore Ravens

To add to this Gordian knot, [Redacted] Coach Leslie Frazier has said that if Brett Favre is able to play against the Lions, he will. 

Seriously?  Is Y.A. Tittle busy on Sunday?

I appreciate everything Favre has done and meant for the Vikings in his two years here, but I have two concerns with this.  For one, the guy is risking permanent, lifelong injury at this point, and love or hate Favre, no one who has a soul wants to see anyone have to deal with long term health issues after they leave the NFL.  I see heroes from my childhood crippled so badly they can barely walk, and it's sad.  Secondly, Favre won't be back with the Vikings in 2011, and neither will Tarvaris Jackson for that matter, so with no playoff spot on the line it makes perfect sense to give Webb another audition.  The only way the Vikings will know whether or not they can go with Webb is for him to be evaluated by playing. 

Webb has earned the Detroit start, with that I don't think there is much debate on.

Regardless of how Webb plays, it gives the Vikings more game tape to make an informed decision.  Let's face it, sometimes guys do well because there is so little game film of him defenses have a hard time scheming against him.  They don't know what his tendencies are, so a guy that doesn't play that often tends to be able to have a few really good games before everything catches up to him.  Think how many times over the years a journeyman backup started against the Vikings and looked like Joe Montana for a day.  This could be the same case here.  And quite frankly, if Frazier and his staff aren't retained, having as much game film on Webb will help the new staff make an informed decision as well.

Here's the problem, and it's two-sided: 

1)  What if Webb plays well and the Vikings go with him and turns out to be 'just a guy', but the Vikings thought he would be 'the guy'? 

2)  What if the Vikings dismiss Webb's late-season spectacularness (is that a word?) as a fluke, and get a so-called 'blue-chip' QB in the draft, and Webb gets a stranglehold on the starter's job like a Brett Hart figure 4 leglock?

Option 2 is better than option 1, but both have downsides.  In the first scenario, we're back to square one at the quarterback position, and it's the Denny Green 1990's all over again--get a guy in a few years past his prime and hope we catch lightning in a bottle, like what happened with Warren Moon and Favre.  But what we end up with is a Jim McMahon, who can't throw 40 yards without a sling shot.  How does the Chad Pennington Noodle Arm Quarterback Review sound for the next five years?  Yeah, didn't think so.

In the second option, it's obviously better to have two good QB's than none, but it will take a couple of seasons to figure out who you go with, and then comes the inevitable trade, much like San Diego had to do with Philip Rivers and Drew Breees a few years back.  Pick the wrong guy to trade, and it comes back to haunt you.  Rivers has been good, but Brees has been otherworldly, winning a Super Bowl with New Orleans.  And if they hadn't drafted Rivers, would they have been able to pick the guy that would've taken them over the top?  Yes, yes, there was the shoulder injury and trade with New York in there, but you get the idea.

And that goes back to this off-season's draft strategy.  If Webb turns out to be the guy, but the Vikings draft yet another QBOTF, when it comes time to trade one of them, it will be hard to keep Webb because of the money spent on the rookie.  It's easy to say that you keep the best guy, but economics do come in to play at the professional level, and when you've given a wheelbarrow full of money to a rookie, it's hard to justify not playing him to the owner.  If there is a new CBA, the rookie wage scale could be a part of that, and this could alleviate that problem, but for now, that is the landscape of the NFL.

Well Mr. Smart Ass blogger, what would YOU do?

Thanks for asking.  I preface my answer with this:  You can peruse DN and find example after example...after example that would prove in a court of law I have no business whatsoever making personnel decisions for the Vikings.  I mean, I advocated for Tarvaris Jackson to start againstthe Giants.  So, yeah.  That said, what I would do:

1.  Start Webb against Detroit, and make him run the whole playbook.  All of it.  Treat this game like a pre-season game and see if there's anything he can't do that is a critical component of the offense.

2.  Personally, I think Webb will play well against Detroit.  And by 'play well', I mean 'he won't suck like Tarvaris Jackson'.  So you give Webb an opportunity to compete for the starting job coming in to training camp in 2011.  

3.  Do not draft a quarterback.  HEY, you in the basement of your mom's house--quit throwing heavy objects at the blogger.  It's not nice, and you'll hurt your back.

4.  Keep Webb, Rhett Bomar (or RJ Archer, they're all the same) and bring in a veteran that can take over if Webb is a spectacular failure.  Donovan McNabb, Carson Palmer, insert name of average quarterback that has worn out his welcome with current team here, it doesn't matter.  Sign them to a two year deal, and if Webb isn't the guy in 2011, draft the next guy in 2012 and have them mentor him.

This allows the Vikings to address the offensive line and secondary, which are almost as critical as addressing the QB situation.  You have 2011 to see if Webb is the guy, and then you make a move for a guy in the 2012 draft if you have to.  And yes, there will be guys in 2012 just as there are guys available in 2011, and if they fix the rookie wage scale, they might be a lot more affordable, making a potential whiff less painful.

There are many ways this can go down, for sure.  This is just my idea--which is an AWESOME one, by the way.  :)

There are a lot of off the field issues that need to be resolved by Vikings ownership before they address what is the most key part of their team.  Will there be a new coaching staff with a new offensive philosophy?  WIll the new stadium be an indoor or outdoor facility?  Can they address all of the roster needs in one off-season?

I'm glad I'm not a personnel guy,  And you should be, too.

Comment 172 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I am!

I am glad that I don’t have to make those decisions; it is much easier to pretend to know what to do and give suggestions than actually making those decisions and then live with the consequences. But, I like your logic and I agree with you. How many rookie quarterbacks have gotten beaten to hell their first year or two because they do not have a solid offensive line in front of them? Too many to count. The Viking staff that make these decisions have done a pretty good job over the past several years and I think they will continue to make good calls. Who knows, maybe we will catch another Randall Cunningham next year.

by TexasViking on Dec 30, 2010 10:53 AM CST reply actions  

Throw out the Bears game film

He was put in losing situation for the Chicago. He got jerked around a million different ways (Weather, AD, O Line, Favruh, Bears D). I don’t think many QBs would have thrived in that enviroment.

Plus he was on my Fantasy Football Champioship roster so that makes him pretty cool in my book.

by Vikes Fan on Dec 30, 2010 11:01 AM CST reply actions  

You can't pick and choose performances

Gotta know if a guy can handle adversity

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota

"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."

by Ted Glover on Dec 30, 2010 11:05 AM CST up reply actions  

You're right

That was a TON of adversity to handle though. I would also like to see him again under center against Detroit. Hopefully they are just talking about starting Favre to keep Detroit guessing.

by Vikes Fan on Dec 30, 2010 11:10 AM CST up reply actions  

I think for Frazier to step up and say

“Sorry Brett – I appreciate all that you’ve done but It is time to evaluate talent and Webb gets the start”, would do a great deal for Frazier’s, uh, leaderabilityship.

by abba7 on Dec 30, 2010 11:42 AM CST up reply actions  

On the contrary

String out the concussion thing whilst still maintaining Favre’s place as a team leader by not kicking his has to the bench. I think it is a respect thing. Frazier doesn’t want to brutally kick one of the best QBs of all time to the curb in public b/c he respects Favre. Make it play out that the concussion is worse than it is and everyone wins. Favre’s reputation (what is left of it) remains, Frazier keeps his respect, and Webb gets his playing time. TADA!

by Jepp The Viking on Dec 30, 2010 1:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Sort of

You can’t exclude weather, the Bears D, etc, but you can probably exclude the performance because of no practice time with the team. I thought he had potential in that game too, though.

by Arif Hasan on Dec 30, 2010 12:02 PM CST up reply actions  

You're right

You can’t pick and choose performances. But I honestly believe that you take any quarterback (and I mean ANY) and put them into that situation with our current team (no AP, bad OLine play, Bears D) and you get the same result, if not worse. Webb didn’t look great. He had errant throws, bad decisions, etc. But he did make some athletic plays that not many other QB’s would make.

He deserves another shot at starting on Sunday. Throw the whole playbook at him and see what he can do. Believe it or not, he might be more athletic than Vick and if he takes it all in, unlike Vick did until after jail time, then he could blossom quickly and turn in to our QB of the future. I’d love to see it happen and shore up some of the other problems we have on this team moving into next year, specifically the Offensive Line.

by Bboc6830 on Dec 30, 2010 12:57 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree and disagree...

Don’t reach with our Pick and go with a project like Locker, but at the same time if Ryan Mallet or Cam Newton are available… I think you have to draft them. On a side note, It would be super super super awesome to get a playmaking safety with that pick or a crazy LB to replace Leber. Address Gaurd in the 2nd round.

...add #4 to the mix and see what you get... Championship.

by Macdaddy4508 on Dec 30, 2010 2:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree

Webb wasn’t bad for a first game under those conditions.

by kcskol on Dec 30, 2010 2:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Bevell did his best Childress impersonation vs the bears with his play calling

That’s why I’m willing to cut Webb some slack for the INTs he threw in that game.

"Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthend, ambition inspired, and success achieved."
-Helen Keller

by NMVike on Jan 1, 2011 3:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Well, I'll cut him some slack

But not for THAT. A QBs job is to execute the vision of the play. Bad playcalling leads to poor or short gains, but it’s better to take a sack or throw an incomplete an interception. Don’t force it.

by Arif Hasan on Jan 1, 2011 4:07 PM CST up reply actions  

The New Collective Bargaining Agreement.........................

will not be struck until the 11th hour!

What does that mean?

No minicamps, no OTA’s, and a condensed training camp…………………………….

Only solution at that hour is of course………..Brett Favre!

Brett Favre is the Greatest QB in NFL History, Bar None!

Brett Favre will be back in 2011, Guaranteed!

Brett Favre will lead the Vikings to a Victory in Super Bowl XLVI, Guaranteed!

by REVENGE4FAVRE on Dec 30, 2010 11:12 AM CST reply actions  

Just a thought

What are you going to do when he actually DOES retire?

by Jepp The Viking on Dec 30, 2010 1:44 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

LOL

He might outlast us all.

by kcskol on Dec 30, 2010 2:43 PM CST up reply actions  

My money is stare longingly...

…. at the photos he has been sent to his mobile phone…

by ViolentSilence on Dec 31, 2010 7:35 AM CST up reply actions  

Good post

And I think your 4 points at the end are very likely what will happen. Carson Palmer in purple? Hmmmmm…. I don’t think he’d like sitting in the backseat, but if we pick him up for a reasonable amount and he LOSES the job to Webb then, by golly, that’s a pretty darned good duo. If dreams really do come true, the Webb is a future HOF QB and we’re set at the position for the next 15 years.

by cyberuck on Dec 30, 2010 11:14 AM CST reply actions  

Webb's play in both games was the same.

The diffence in the outcomes of the game was the performance of the defense. In the bears game the defense couldn’t stop the bears from scoring. Webb made some good plays and some bad. some good throws and some bad but you can’t expect a rookie qb to keep up in a shootout. against the eagles, he never played from behind and the defense never let the eagles get on track. add to that the fact the oline also stepped up and protected him for the most part and he was able to succeed. Webb has alot of talent but he has a long way to go to be able to be a starting qb in the league. the real question for me: " is there anyone on the vikings staff that knows how to develop a QB?" if TJ is any indication, I’d say no. Webb gave alot of credit to the help he got from Brett both in practice and during the game. that’s what he needs to be successful. someone that knows and can communicate what’s important and what’s not. so forget about picking up McNabb or Palmer, 2 qb’s that haven’t played well in years and go out and get someone who actually knows how to develop a qb.

by FlFan on Dec 30, 2010 11:21 AM CST reply actions  

Caught in the Webb

(Webb has alot of talent but he has a long way to go to be able to be a starting qb in the league.)
Quoted by FIFan. The 1st part is right. The 2nd part is wrong. He doesn’t have a long way to go. Tarvaris Jackson has a long way to go but Joe Webb is there. Have you ever been to a Friday night High School football game? You know the kids name that you keep hearing over & over on the loudspeakers because he is all over the field. Well that’s Joe Webb. The guy did in college what NO ONE has ever done before. Throwing over 2000 yards & rushing for over a 1000 in back to back seasons. Everyone’s going to say then why wasn’t he a top ten pick? Because he slipped through the cracks. He didn’t play at Ohio State or Florida so the spotlight was never on him. There are hundreds of guys that according to the so called experts that should not even be on an NFL roster. Yet here they are every Sunday. You can’t measure heart. It’s an intangible. The reason there are playing is because they got a shot. Drafted in 1st round or 7th round it makes no difference if you can play. Joe got a shot & that’s why this blog is giddy over the guy. He can play. Experience can only help him.

by iowaron on Dec 30, 2010 12:52 PM CST up reply actions  

couldn't agree with you more

Although i would have to say that it’s a stretch to say that he’s ready NOW. He’s going to develope, but he can START now and even if he doesn’t explode next year, he should improve and in 2012, that’s when we should start to see the real player. People don’t understand how unrealistic it is for someone to come in rookie/soph and play lights out. Doesn’t happen! Manning stunk his rookie year and every year he’s made improvements. I will say one thing, Webb’s ceiling is pretty dang high and that’s all you look for when drafting so why not let his guy run around a little and see what he’s made of. It’s so overstated, but you have to go back to Brady. If he wins another SB this year, he’s the GREATEST of all time in my eyes and they didn’t get him until the 6th round. REALLY think about that. The GREATEST of all time, may not have been drafted. There’s too much to learn in the QB position and WAAAAY to early to pass judgement on him. Let’s just sit back, get excited and see what comes of him. SKOL!

by DM_Purp on Dec 30, 2010 6:26 PM CST up reply actions  

OOPS

meant to say “let THIS guy run around a little” not “let HIS guy run around a little” – sounds like i was talking about Favre…haha

by DM_Purp on Dec 30, 2010 6:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Favre has said repeatedly he is not a teacher.

And has no desire to coach when he’s done playing. I believe him on this. Ask Aaron Rodgers how much he “learned” from Favre. Oh wait, he won’t tell you, because he didn’t.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 1:16 PM CST up reply actions  

The reason why Favre has been a top qb most of his career is because of his ability to escape the collapsing pocket, throw the ball into close quarters, and his team mates end up coming down with it. It has nothing to do with his ability to call plays, just his success rate on ill advised passes. He would be a horrible qb coach, because of all the things that make him great, no other “great qb” has done. All the records Favre holds are because of longevity, not because of him being a great qb….note he holds just about all the records both good and bad for qb’s. Case in point, Joe Montana played for 15 yrs, Dan Marino for 16 yrs, you get the picture, the more yrs one plays, the more touchdowns, passing yards, interceptions, etc. that one will have.

Probably the best thing to watch Favre for has been his enthusiasm for football. He has been an exciting qb, not because of following the book, but because he played his heart out, took chances and those chances mostly worked out.

by Chris3 on Dec 31, 2010 3:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Don't think you are giving Webb enough credit

His play was very solid on Tuesday… and okay for a rookie under terrible conditions and circumstances the week before against Chicago. I expect mistakes. I was surprised at how natural he looked on Tuesday. Furthermore, the OL still had problems. However, they moved Webb out of the pocket a number of times. He also managed to escape what looked like sure sacks. If he regularly played like he played on Tuesday, he’d be a starter on half the teams in the league — maybe more.

by kcskol on Dec 30, 2010 2:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Umm, but there's the *if*

You can’t know he will. You can’t know he’ll EVER play that well again. And no, his play against Chicago was not “ok.” The picks were awful. And he had all week with the 1st team, so there was no excuse. You can’t cherry-pick results.

All I’m saying is you don’t go into next season without insurance. To do so is to repeat the TJack experience. And it’s to send a message to Webb that he doesn’t have to work to earn his place. And that’s the wrong message to send.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 7:12 PM CST up reply actions  

If all your saying is don't go into next season without insurance...

…I’m okay with that. Sounds sensible.

On the other point, I don’t think I cherry-picked results against Chicago. Other than the first drive, Favre didn’t play well either. And the OL was uncommonly bad. Webb got little help. I think he did okay under the circumstances.

by kcskol on Dec 30, 2010 9:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Let me put it this way

would you rather have a QB situation like Philly has? Two guys who can both run the offense and win games for you. Or a QB situation like we have this year? Where you’re 1 hit from a nightmare.

And the O-line does need to be addressed. But even QBs behind good lines get hit often enough to get hurt. You can’t bet that just because you have a good line your QB will stay healthy all season.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 10:08 PM CST up reply actions  

your right, qb’s behind good lines will get hurt….maybe 3 plays every half….look at how often someone gets a chance to hit Tom Brady. When Brady was injured, Cassel looked like a seasoned veteran, though the kid last played qb in high school…not even in college. Put any qb behind a great line, and they will look like football gods. Put any of them behind the Vikings Oline, and they will look like they don’t belong in the NFL. Pure and simple, Webb looked better than Jackson or Favre has all season. The reasons are that Favre isn’t mobile, Jackson isn’t that good, and the Oline doesn’t give the QB more than 2 seconds (average around the league is 4) before he gets sacked.

by Chris3 on Dec 31, 2010 3:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Please, don't try to tell me Cassel is a bum.

Look at what he did at KC this season. Cassel sitting at USC has to do with the Leinart Heisman campaign, not comparative talent and drive.

There’s a great deal of exaggeration going on in these threads about how “bad QBs can look good behind great O-lines.” Umm, no. A Bad QB will still make bad QB plays. Simply put, there’s no position more important in the game. You don’t just blow off the chance to draft a good player at that position, or you have the mess we have now.

by Shawn Gillogly on Jan 1, 2011 6:45 PM CST up reply actions  

I disagree 100%

If a QB is the best available player when we pick, you take him. Period. Even if you think Webb is the guy.

Injuries happen, players misfire, development stalls. You do NOT, even if you think Webb is the player you saw against Philly and not the bum we saw against Chicago—and I’m not going to discount the Chicago performance, because he was given all the 1st team reps in practice during the week, so there was no excuse for coming in clueless—throw all your eggs in 1 basket.

For all we know, Webb could have a beautiful season next year, and someone could cheap shot his knee, and he never be the same again (to bring up an allusion to one of the QBs in this discussion). So you never, ever, throw all your eggs in 1 basket. Period.

And I don’t want the backup plan being Sage Rosenfels or some other lightweight either. Bring in a REAL QB option, and have a REAL competition for the position. Make Webb earn his job, every step of the way. In the long run, both he and the team will be better for the competition.

BTW, we already have a replacement for Pat Williams, he’s been playing at least as many snaps as Phat Pat this season anyway. So scratch that one off the list. I’ve given my O-Line revamp, and it would require only 1 player acquisition. You’re not going to be able to find more serviceable pieces to the line an offseason you can bring in well anyway.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 11:23 AM CST reply actions  

Carson Palmer

knee injury—career wasted

You draft the best player available. If he’s a QB, you take him. If he’s an O-lineman, you take that.

If he’s a RUNNING BACK, you take that, or you trade down and get more picks. But you don’t reach for a position in the 1st 3 rounds. Period.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Right. Zygi’s aggressive, anyway, so if (excluding QB) you consider their two most immediate needs to be interior O-line and secondary (as I do), then it’s feasible to address those in free agency with, say, Carl Nicks and Josh Wilson. That’s two immediate starters in their 20s. That’s not as splashy as Jared Allen of Brett Favre, maybe, but they could be just as effective. Then they’re freed up in the draft to fish for impact players, or to finally take a definitive shot at getting some direction at QB.

by jianfu on Dec 30, 2010 2:06 PM CST up reply actions  

our draft history

would suggest that we’ll take the best player available, but i think you try to narrow that down to safefy/QB/OL – in any order

by DM_Purp on Dec 30, 2010 6:52 PM CST up reply actions  

If you think of it as an investment, hypothetically, if you draft a solid QB and Webb’s for real…not only is that an infinitly better position to be in than they’ve been in the entire Childress era (and more), that’s some major future returns on those two picks. You’ll recoup the cost then some in a deal. Philly can probably move Kevin Kolb (2nd rounder) for multiple picks, or maybe a first rounder, if they wanted to.

Plus, nobody’s going to know if Webb’s for real come draft time, anyway. Even if he goes for 350 yards on 30 attempts, 4 TDs. and stiff-arms Ndamukong Suh to the ground on multiple sack attempts, they’ll still be short a couple QBs.

by jianfu on Dec 30, 2010 2:01 PM CST up reply actions  

one week of practice with the first string and your supposed to go out and light up possibly the number 1 team in the nfc? He made good plays against the Bears but the defense just wasnt holding up.

I agree that we shouldnt put all our eggs in one basket either. Thats why he said in the offseason pickup a former Franchise QB whose overstayed their welcome like Mcnabb or Palmer. Maybe even Orton

Guion and Kennedy have played pretty well this season so I agree with you.

And I believe we should draft Greg Mcelroy late in the draft somewhere

by vikesfan4lyf on Dec 30, 2010 1:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Injuries happen Shawn. There is nothing you can do about them.

The Bears lost tons of guys last year to injury & they sucked. They have been almost injury free this season & they win the division. It’s not a coincidence. Staying healthy is huge in this league. There are a few good teams & a few bad teams & 80% of teams are really pretty darn equal. Injuries & a play or two will be the difference between 6-10 & 10-6. As far as all the eggs in one basket thing goes. That’s what we just did. Last year we were all in with Favre. We ended up one play away from the Superbowl. This year we did it again. Well we all know how it turned out this year. We can play one hand a time & hope we win enough hands to get us where we what to go or we can go all in. I say give Joe one year & fix the line & see what happens. No ones going to pick us to do anything next year & quite frankly that’s just the way I like it. No Favre circus. Frazier can get the guys on track. There is still a ton of talent on this team & if Webb can have a solid year we will can win the division a get 27th try at the prize.

by iowaron on Dec 30, 2010 1:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Heh, You do realize *I'm* the one who's been saying injuries happen.

Even if you think Webb is the guy, you don’t lay all the eggs in his basket. That’s a good way to turn positive confidence into pure hubris. He has to win the job in a real competition—not something rigged like San Fran’s “competition” a few years ago.

The Bears also benefited from a 3rd place schedule this season. Guess which schedule we’ll get next season?

Injuries happen is the reason you don’t reach. You can never have enough depth at any position. So for rounds 1-3 you take players you KNOW can contribute, regardless of position. Once you get to round 4, then you can take flyers.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 1:39 PM CST up reply actions  

The emphasis in the draft.......

has to be the O line. As currently constructed, you can put who you want behind center, and you risk negligent homicide. Webb, IMO, is the frontrunner for the position and should compete for it. Sometimes, you have to trust your first instinct and go with it. We know what we saw the other night.

by Mel Allen on Dec 30, 2010 11:33 AM CST reply actions  

You do not reach

in rounds 1-3. Period. You draft best available player.

There is no position that is so deep in the NFL that you can afford to bypass infusing talent. And there’s always the chance to make trades later.

Reaching for positions leads to Dimitrius Underwoods. Need we say more?

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 11:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Exactly

Though given the drama that was Dimitrius Underwood, I suspect selective amnesia.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 12:44 PM CST up reply actions  

:(

Your constant referencing to Dimitrius Underwood is causing some serious episodes as we’re forced to confront our previously buried past.

It’s like we’re becoming mentally unstable…

by Arif Hasan on Dec 30, 2010 1:10 PM CST up reply actions  

You have a point, no doubt...

but, I remind you that the Lions could not resist drafting receiver after receiver after receiver, who seemingly were the best players available at the times they were picked. That did not go so well.

by Mel Allen on Dec 30, 2010 11:49 AM CST up reply actions  

Matt Millen couldn't draft a beer, but

they’ve had good drafts since Schwartz became the coach. There’s a new sheriff in town, and they know what they’re doing.

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota

"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."

by Ted Glover on Dec 30, 2010 12:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes...

my point was the receivers they picked were the “best available.” I should have known even mentioning “Lions” and “drafting” in the same sentence would create a commotion.

by Mel Allen on Dec 30, 2010 12:47 PM CST up reply actions  

In what world was Mike Williams (after sitting out a year) the best availible player.

#notthatiwanttorememberthe2005draft

by d_fens on Dec 30, 2010 2:42 PM CST up reply actions  

huh?

stafford (when not hurt) megatron and suh are pretty good picks

by favre4204ever on Dec 30, 2010 3:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Underwood was more of a pure bad evaluation than a reach-for-need. Patrick Kearney went on the very next pick in that draft and has had a very nice career as a 4-3 defensive end.

I think the pure BPA approach isn’t as cut-and-dry as many proponents of the strategy think. I think the genuninly rare talent gets gobbled up very early (top 10 picks or so), and after that it’s more about keen evaluation, development, and luck. Obviously you never want to “reach,” but I don’t necessarily see any reason not to consider team needs at all if you’re picking outside the top 10 or so, not unless there’s just a jaw-dropper available.

I think most successful teams identify a handful of areas on the roster where a young player could make an impact and go from there. I also think there are certain positions that get picked higher because of their importance.

by jianfu on Dec 30, 2010 2:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Like left tackle for one.

This is where the pick should be. End of story.

It is time to get a left tackle.

Most mocks have all these defensive players going high but few left tackles.

Don’t believe the hype. Left tackle is too important and they will go early like most years.

For example, if Gabe Carimi is there at #14, I would have no problem if the Vikings picked him.

The dude won the Outland Trophy (like McKinnie did), was Big 10 offensive lineman of the year, and All American.

I mean what else could you want to replace McKinnie with?

If he is a bust then so be it. But I doubt it. I think he could be used somewhere.

Also, there really are no left tackles that will be free agents besides Matt Light (32 years old) and Jared Gaither (26 years old but did not play this whole year).

I like Carimi, Sherrod, Castonzo, or Solder.

It all starts up front and the Vikings need to get younger there first and foremost. Once they do that they will not need to address it for a few years besides decent backups.

by MarkSP18 on Dec 31, 2010 11:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Ah, so reach away, huh?

Sorry, Underwood was a reach. He wasn’t a talent where he was chosen, and he was picked there solely because of pressure on Green to upgrade the Defense.

You pick the best player available when your pick is up, or you trade to where the player you want is. Otherwise, you don’t reach, especially not on Day 1. And even more so when you’ve dumped a draft pick already.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 31, 2010 12:10 PM CST up reply actions  

You think Carimi is a reach?

I disagree. Either him or Sherrod or Castonzo are solid picks in the mid first round.

Check many of the different sites that scout players and this is what these sites say.

So why would this guy be a reach?

And who would be better?

Then you speak of trading down or up in vague terms.

Why don’t you list some teams that would be good candidates to trade up or down with? It could lead to more discussion.

Otherwise anyone can say trade down and pick up extra picks.

I think they need to be able to protect a QB before they try and draft one but that is just me.

You are wrong about the top offensive tackles being reaches in the mid first round.

by MarkSP18 on Dec 31, 2010 2:05 PM CST up reply actions  

We don't know who's coming out, who's staying in

or the final projections on the draft boards right now. Saying who’s a reach and who isn’t is nothing but utter speculation at this point. Until you see players compete against their peers and in the combine, it’s film based on (usually) grossly inferior competition.

by Shawn Gillogly on Jan 1, 2011 6:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Speaking of center

Anyone else think we need a new one?

by Vikes Fan on Dec 30, 2010 11:38 AM CST up reply actions  

If it’s not a need, then we could certainly use one.

by cyberuck on Dec 30, 2010 12:44 PM CST up reply actions  

I think we should move Ryan Cook back to center

He played extremely well in that one game. They should see how he does in the offseason.

And continue to develop Degeare to replace Hutchinson

by vikesfan4lyf on Dec 30, 2010 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

YES!

Sullivan is undersized and besides getting pushed around, I’m surprised to see that he also has trouble picking up the right guy and snapping the ball.

by kcskol on Dec 30, 2010 2:52 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree

Keep Webb, bring in a Vet for a 1 or 2 year deal. Draft O Line, Secondary, D Line. Build up the foundation around the talent we have, then plan on 2012 being the year of the Franchise QB, whether it’s Webb or another high draft pick.

We aren’t just a QB away anymore. That window closed, hard, this season.

by JMigz on Dec 30, 2010 12:04 PM CST reply actions  

Hey Ted I'm caught in the Webb.

I with you all the way. No team is ever satisfied. There are always weak spots. If you got a guy like Webb & you think he can be the man you go with it. Fix the line & will be fine. Say it with me now. Fix the line & will be fine. 1.Your going to have to protect whoever is back there. 2. Opening up holes for AP is a good thing. 3. There will be QB’s in the 1st round the following year. 4. If Webb sucks we will be in good shape to draft one. 5. If he doesn’t then we saved a ton of money for other players.

by iowaron on Dec 30, 2010 12:17 PM CST reply actions  

I'll say it with ya

Fix the line & will be fine!!!!! The foundation to any good team is the O-line.

by NoSlack on Dec 30, 2010 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

What's apparent about Webb.....

is that HE believes he is the man for the job. This was never apparent with TJack, or, for that matter many other QBs either.

by Mel Allen on Dec 30, 2010 12:49 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

That's a BIG +14

Vikings 2010: Episode 2, A New Hope - The Alliance for Vikings sanity have struck back. The evil Childress has been fired. Hope has been reinstated with the naming of Frazier as Head Coach.

by VikesFaninNM on Dec 30, 2010 1:15 PM CST up reply actions  

I mostly concur.

I would argue however that O-line > QB. A good o-line makes an average rb and qb look good. A good qb with a bad o-line can’t do anything.

How much do you think CPalmer would demand? $5-7mil+?

by Codypc21 on Dec 30, 2010 12:51 PM CST reply actions  

Add to first line: Except for Joe Webb that is who seems to do pretty well with a casper o-line.

by Codypc21 on Dec 30, 2010 12:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh boy

You swatted that beehive pretty hard Ted.

But many good points, and one’s that I am struggling with myself.

Webb has given me alot to hope for. But also, like you said, what if he does eventually turn into a bomb, not the bomb?

I do think the kid has a much better ability to think, make “in play” changes then T-Jack ever had the ability too. And to be honest, I was never thrilled with Jackson’s supposed athletic ability, let alone his mental ability. Even his 1st year, before my entrance here almost 2 years ago, I was against Jackson. I never saw anything in him both in Brains and Braun, let alone any slight shred of confidence. With Webb, I don’t know, something just has been nagging at me that this kid might be able to turn into what Josh Freeman has. Someone who came in off the radar, had a rough and long learning 2nd half rookie season, not so rough 1st half of the season to a kid who looks like he’s been in the NFL a few years. Yes, I know Freeman was drafted in the 1st round, but Stafford and Sanchez were getting more press then Freeman was. And so far, I would say Freeman has been the better of the 3. And yes, I do know the QB class of 2009 was less then yawn inspiring. But no one thought Freeman would be able to do what he has done.

We have massive needs at other positions to address in the draft and thru Free Agency. And thanks to a certian idiot no longer ruining running the team, we have one less pick in 2011 and 2012 with nothing to show forth. Also, drafting a QB who may or may not be able to transition to the NFL and paying a ton of money, is it worth it right now? Especially with a possible uncapped off-season looming?

More I’ve thought about it after seeing how Webb has done over a game and half, how high the price for bringing in McNabb or Palmer? None of them will want to be a back-up to a “kid”, let alone being in a starting competition. Hell, even Kyle Orton would be hating that. I’m sure he isn’t too thrilled with being back up to Tebow & Quinn right now. So, I would hate to say, it would have to be someone like Ramsey to play back-up. Ramsey know’s he’ll probably not get much of a shot at ever being a starter, so he would be highly motivated IF he has to take over. Yeah, I know, I sound nut’s, but any player like him would be motivated.

Finally, ANY QB, whether a veteran or drafted one, no matter how highly drafted, is a gamble. As I said and many have said, we have many higher pressing issues to deal with. Right now, as for the QB gamble, I say it’s worth it to see how Webb does. Right now, the odd’s are a little more in our favor then it is in the house’s favor.

Vikings 2010: Episode 2, A New Hope - The Alliance for Vikings sanity have struck back. The evil Childress has been fired. Hope has been reinstated with the naming of Frazier as Head Coach.

by VikesFaninNM on Dec 30, 2010 1:13 PM CST reply actions  

So basically you're saying

repeat things the TJack way because Webb had 1 good game? Wow. Just wow. If you always do what you always did, you always get what you always got.

First of all, there’s no excuse NOT to have 2 capable QBs on a team. Injuries happen.

Second, even TJack had good games. You don’t know if this isn’t the triumph of the uncluttered mind.

Make him EARN the job. You don’t hand it away.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 1:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Tjack and Webb are completely different situations.

Tjack was unimpressive in preseason, unimpressive starting the regular season, and very bad in the playoffs. So far Webb has been stellar in the pre season and solid in the regular season. Webb seems like the anti-jackson. Webb is much better as a starter than off the bench.

If you’ve watched Webb and Jackson play you can see that they are very different players. Webb is much better physically than Jackson and is already better mentally. The comparison that we should be watching is Webb and Vick. By many accounts Webb is about even athletically to the rookie Vick but a better passer.

by Codypc21 on Dec 30, 2010 1:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Really?

TJack didn’t look better than Webb did in his 4TD game vs Arizona?

Please. I was never a TJack fan, but even I had to admit that was a good effort. And by “all” accounts until last week, Webb was a WR in waiting.

All I’m saying is he has to win the job. And he has to win it legitimately. No more rigged competitions and last minute flights to Miss when we discover things aren’t what we hoped they’d be.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 1:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Defense and AP

set up T-Jack to succeed against Arizona in 2008. T-Jack didn’t carry the team. He wasn’t the one moving the ball down the field during key drives. He made a couple good throws that game but he wasn’t the catalyst for the win.
Webb has earned the opportunity to compete for the starting job. Ted’s simply suggesting if everything doesn’t pan out in the draft, such as Luck and Newton not declaring, don’t draft a QB. Let Webb run the ship with an accomplished or compenent Vet behind him. No point in truly drafting a top caliber QB if you can’t keep him upright. Webb showed the ability keep himself alive but using his athletic ability to make defenders miss.
Another plus to Webb being the QB back there is the fringe benefit to AP. Imagine how quickly the DL would tired out chasing down a mobile QB like Webb and then having to run up and down the line trying to keep AP under control.
He gives us a lot of upside IF he can keep his composure and not make the bad decision like T-Jack when pressure comes from the opposing D.

by AlldayFurore on Dec 31, 2010 12:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Did I say he 'carried' the team?

And those same factors enabled Webb to have a solid game against Philly. Or are you discounting AD’s performance?

And there’s ALWAYS a reason to draft a QB when you need one…and we do. Or do you want to keep revisiting trips to Mississippi, Gus Ferret’s, Brad Johnson’s and TJack failures? Bottom line, no position changes the game like QB, you have a chance for one, you take it.

by Shawn Gillogly on Jan 1, 2011 6:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Tjack isn't Webb Shawn that's what we are trying to tell you.

Tjack did play well at times & yes he is a good athlete in his own right. Webb is a better than Tjack.

by iowaron on Dec 30, 2010 1:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Based on 1 game you KNOW this?

How many 1 game wonders have their been in NFL history?

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 1:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Jackson is like a mini van. You take it to the race track every weekend for a few years and say it averages a 5 minute lap. Then you get Webb, a Ferrari. He does his first lap in 3 minutes. Sometimes you can tell. (It doesnt help that Jackson set the bar reaaaaaly low.)

Webb was great in college and pre season. The question was if that could translate into the NFL. So far the evidence points to yes.

by Codypc21 on Dec 30, 2010 1:54 PM CST up reply actions  

so far is 1 game

And if he gets injured, what do you have?

There’s no reason not to have two CAPABLE QBs on the roster. Besides, even if you bring in a vet and he wins the competition outright, you can still use Webb’s athleticism in packages (run a Pistol set with him, for instance), use him in short yardage to put pressure on a defense.

There’s ways to break him in without breaking him.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 2:00 PM CST up reply actions  

There is a reason why you shouldn't.

It’s called 5-10 million dollars/ yr. If we bring in a Carson Palmer he will want to start. If Webb wins your competition you have a mess. People complained that TJack and Rosencopter were making too much as backups.

by Codypc21 on Dec 30, 2010 2:13 PM CST up reply actions  

And that was an unrealistic critique

Almost every good team has 2 solid QBs. The better critique was Sagaras Jackenfeld was a single useful backup in 2 parts.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 7:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe you should clarify.

I do not understand what is unrealistic. Jackson was making 2.5mil? and Sage 3mil? That is too much for a player that sits on the bench. That would have been enough to keep Birk (if he would have been willing to stay under chilly).

Even for Zigglemeister, money is not free.

by Codypc21 on Dec 30, 2010 7:23 PM CST up reply actions  

No, we already offered more for Birk than the Ravens

It was 100% Klink related with Birk, money was not the issue.

And it’s an unrealistic critique because if you look around the league, 3-5 mil for the backup QB is standard. We’re going to pay that even if he’s a bum. Better to have a realistic option—which Sagaras Jackenfeld wasn’t.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 8:01 PM CST up reply actions  

2 solid QBs?

Really? I would disagree there. If most teams have two solid QBs, why is there so many teams looking for QBs? Couldn’t you just trade for one of these many “solid” QBs? Why wouldn’t these solid QBs be leaving to make starting money on a team that obviously could use them?
Because most teams have at best one good QB and a guy who can take over for the remainder of the game but you wouldn’t necessarily entrust your season to. Situations like Vick/Kolb are rare and unsustainable because they both want to make starting QB money and teams can’t afford that and keeping other key positions well paid. Kolb still hasn’t even proven he’s a legit starter either. Most places have former starters who are well past their twilight or high draft picks who turned out to be busts.

by AlldayFurore on Dec 31, 2010 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

I said most GOOD teams.

crappy teams without quality personnel management think like most people on this board. Then they cry when there’s an injury.

by Shawn Gillogly on Jan 1, 2011 6:49 PM CST up reply actions  

I still disagree

What good teams are you thinking of that possess two “I can start in the NFL” QBs? Indy? NE? Baltimore? Chicago?

Of the teams that made the playoffs, I count about 2 or 3 teams you could make a case have two solid QBs. Kolb is still largely unknown. He’s only started a handful of games and still hasn’t looked overly impressive. Flynn played one game thus far, so the case for him being solid is fairly limited. Batch has proven he can play effectivelty for short periods of time but not neccessarily someone you want to handle the entire season.

So I ask, who are the GOOD teams that have two solid QBs?

by AlldayFurore on Jan 3, 2011 1:22 PM CST up reply actions  

It's called poise. Go back & look at Tjack. A deer in the headlights

I’ll give you it’s only one game. Well actually 2. We all saw what he did against the Bears. He threw a couple of bad picks. He also made a run that no only QB in the league could have made. There a lots of one game wonders but for every one game wonder there are alot more one game disasters. If we are wrong about Webb & I say we because most of us are on the Joe Webb bandwagon. Hey Shawn you can come back & rub it in my face if I’m wrong. I wanted Tjack to get another chance too. He got it & he failed. Will Joe fail? I honestly don’t know. He gives us something to be excited about. This season was supposed to be another shot at the Superbowl. Well no Superbowl has turned into a Joe Webb lovefest. Our staff will make the final decision on Joe Webb’s future. I’ll leave that in there hands. Like I got a choice. I guess your the half empty glass & I’m the half full one. I respect your opinion I just don’t agree with it.

by iowaron on Dec 30, 2010 2:09 PM CST up reply actions  

i agree

Can’t take one game and figure a guy’s career. I think it’s pretty simple as long as you tell it how it is. Webb has had a bad game and a good game. He is a rookie and still a raw talent. With a full offseason, hopefully he gets better and is ready to start in the NFL, but you HAVE to have someone else(vet/rookie) to push eachother and you REALLY have to make sure that you’re not favoring one over the other (ie: well, [insert rook/vet] had a good preseason, but webb had a really good game against the eagles last year so we will give him the job) NO NO NO. Last time i checked the Vick/Kolb scenario didn’t work out too bad for the Eagles

by DM_Purp on Dec 30, 2010 7:53 PM CST up reply actions  

What?

Sure as hell wasn’t making any excuses, and only stating fact. McNabb or any of them are not going to sign unless they know they will be a starter for the long term. So we just let someone waste away? Wow, just wow.

Hell, Jackson had a few games, but a good defense and running game can make Jackson look good. Yeah, you can say the same thing about Webb this past Tuesday, but he looked a hell of alot more poised against Chicago then Jackson would have been.

I would feel a hell of alot more confident handing over the team to someone like Webb then I would Jackson. Sooner or later, you have to give him the key’s just like they did Jackson in 2008. We know where that went too.

And again, as I stated, you are still taking that same gamble with a veteran in anycase. Just because you sign a veteran, doesn’t mean squat!

Vikings 2010: Episode 2, A New Hope - The Alliance for Vikings sanity have struck back. The evil Childress has been fired. Hope has been reinstated with the naming of Frazier as Head Coach.

by VikesFaninNM on Dec 30, 2010 1:43 PM CST up reply actions  

It's not the "same" gamble.

Because if you have the veteran go south, you still have Webb.

If Webb fails, you’ve got nobody.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 1:44 PM CST up reply actions  

As I stated

good luck in hoping a veteran like McNabb, Palmer or Orton are going to come in here without being guaranteed a longterm QB job. They are going to want that.

Vikings 2010: Episode 2, A New Hope - The Alliance for Vikings sanity have struck back. The evil Childress has been fired. Hope has been reinstated with the naming of Frazier as Head Coach.

by VikesFaninNM on Dec 30, 2010 1:47 PM CST up reply actions  

They're pros

They know nothing in the NFL is certain. If you look them in the eye and tell them if they play best, they’ll start, that’s all they need.

And honestly, I don’t think all 3 of them are going to get ‘guaranteed #1" offers. There just aren’t that many believers in them around the league.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 1:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Shawn I agree with you. They get another shot but nothing is guaranteed.
  1. you don’t trade any draft choices for them. 2. They get a chance to compete for the job. 3. No contract longer than 2 years.

by iowaron on Dec 30, 2010 2:17 PM CST up reply actions  

TJack had one good game his entire career

…and it was in Arizona. Webb already has a good game under his belt, so in my book he’s already ahead.

by kcskol on Dec 30, 2010 2:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think Shawn is saying that Jackson is better than Webb.

He’s saying that Webb might not be ready to be the #1 guy yet. And even if Webb is ready, it’s best to be prepared in case in case he gets injured.

I agree with Shawn. Webb has to earn the #1 slot next year. Lets bring a few different guys into camp and have a competition. If Webb is as ready as most people think, than he shouldn’t have much trouble beating K.Ortin or C.Palmer for the #1.

by chaosg on Dec 30, 2010 4:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh, I guess I thought they were FA's lol.

The point is, that we bring in some competition.

by chaosg on Dec 30, 2010 4:45 PM CST up reply actions  

They will be in all likelihood

and money has hardly been a concern under Ziggy

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 7:18 PM CST up reply actions  

The more you post

The more you’re selling to me (that’s a good thing), but GOD what I would give for a good OL…

At any rate, money IS a concern, but not for Ziggy. We’re returning to a capped league and we’re probably over what that cap would be. Just saying.

by Arif Hasan on Dec 31, 2010 2:31 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm not saying we don't need to upgrade the O-line.

But we can’t do it all at once. We’ll be lucky to find 2 pieces in the offseason. So a lot of it is going to have to be coaching and better use of what we have. I’ve given my O-line solution a host of times (Loadholt to Guard, McKinnie to RT, and acquire a LT by draft or FA, then go back to the man-drive blocking scheme that fits our personnel better). And then find a useful O-line coach who isn’t sold on Klink’s “system.”

But it’s not valid to do an “either-or” approach. You can’t spend 4-5 years fixing the O-line and THEN bring in a QB. Because by the time you do, in the NFL, you’ll have to revamp the line ‘again.’

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 31, 2010 7:46 AM CST up reply actions  

My idea

Sit Webb next year and sign a FA QB like Mcnabb or Palmer for one or two years. I prefer Palmer though and let Webb pick up from a qb like palmer. Draft a QB late while we use our first two draft picks on a OL and a Safety or CB. Use our 4th rounder on Mcelroy or Dalton.

Get Cook and Griffin back up to speed and release Sheppard and keep Walker.

Keep Abdullah and Sanford and let go of Williams. Keep Johnson for depth.

And i know its going to be some free agent Olineman out there. Pick him up and then sign some free agents to shore up the linebacking core and defensive line.

Also I would invest in Booker for another few years and I would sign or draft another quick (but bigger in size then Harvin) playmaking reciever.

by vikesfan4lyf on Dec 30, 2010 1:27 PM CST reply actions  

You forgot:

Dump Berrian. A reciever needs to catch. He is like a slow, fragile, expensive Troy Williamson.

by Codypc21 on Dec 30, 2010 1:39 PM CST up reply actions  

palmer is on a team filled with a bunch of divas who would rather showboat then win. I just think he needs a change of scenery

by vikesfan4lyf on Dec 30, 2010 4:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Please stop with the Mcnabb.

That guy is done. He has gotten fat and lazy.

I think Palmer needs to get out of Cincy, I would be okay with him, but please, NO Mcnabb.

by bf4mvp on Dec 30, 2010 1:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Who do we have in the secondary that isnt terrible?

Winfield
Griffen
Cook
Sanford
Abdullah

Is there anyone else worth a damn? What do we do here? Should we go for a high end safety or corner?

by Codypc21 on Dec 30, 2010 1:58 PM CST reply actions  

Didnt he have one of the really bad drops?

I think shep had one and I thought frankie had the other.

by Codypc21 on Dec 30, 2010 2:00 PM CST up reply actions  

He had the BRUTAL drop

But he did make a couple nice breakups.

But yes, Walker’s drop was so bad Les screamed at him over it.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 2:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Ok.

Where does walker fit in out future plans for the secondary? I think he was pretty old last time I checked and that probably isnt getting better any time soon.

by Codypc21 on Dec 30, 2010 2:06 PM CST up reply actions  

He's played pretty well this year

Especially for coming in off the street. Got more value than you could have ever asked for out of the guy! I hope he’s back next year.

I'm still a Minnesotan at heart...

by urluckyday on Dec 30, 2010 6:40 PM CST up reply actions  

He can compete for a job next season.

See what he does in camp. But I hope you’re not planning on him getting a lot of reps. I think over the course of the season, he’d be found out.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 7:20 PM CST up reply actions  

So after establishing Walker's servicability(?), where are we?

We probably keep Asher, right? Do we go after another corner?

by Codypc21 on Dec 30, 2010 7:25 PM CST up reply actions  

We've got secondary problems

We generally work around them. That’s not to say we shouldn’t fix them, but I think a CB is low on our list of priorities. Probably QB, OL (DN is debating the order of the two), SS/FS, DT (And a small debate on the order of these two—the draft class is pretty hot for safeties and defensive linemen), CB.

That’s the feeling I’m getting around here and it feels about right.

by Arif Hasan on Dec 31, 2010 2:34 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm really not sold we need a DT

I think we have adequate D-line depth even if PhatPat goes. That’s assuming we resign Edwards, of course. But we won’t know if he does or not until after the draft prob ably anyway.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 31, 2010 7:47 AM CST up reply actions  

OK

We don’t “need” a DL upgrade, I just think a lot of people are worried that as our line ages, it’s dominance will fade and we will become (or have become) merely average. Which is fine, if you’ve got other working parts. But Vikings fans, at least as it seems to me, are very sold on the idea of a dominant D Line being part of our identity. And I’m not convinced we have other working parts.

I think if Prince or Akumakara falls to us and we have resolved our QB situation another way, then yea, we should take them. But, in general, it probably has a higher return on our defensive production if we sign another good defensive lineman. I think PhatPat is aging and I honestly don’t know about our backups. I hear we have solid depth.

by Arif Hasan on Dec 31, 2010 1:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Oops

I mean Petersen or Akumakara

by Arif Hasan on Dec 31, 2010 1:21 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not sold that we need a safety.

I think it’s a scheme issue with them more than a talent issue.

I'm still a Minnesotan at heart...

by urluckyday on Dec 31, 2010 10:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Until we stop deciding to run the Tampa 2

We need talent at safeties and we just don’t have them.

Madieu Williams was good. He is no longer good. You can see that he lacks talent regardless of the scheme when you see him break for a tip or interception or take an angle to tackle a runner. It’s bad fundamentals and bad talent.

The others? Yea, no.

by Arif Hasan on Dec 31, 2010 1:15 PM CST up reply actions  

sharpshooter

brett hart did the sharp shooter not the figure 4 ……………just sayin that was ric flair

by favre4204ever on Dec 30, 2010 3:25 PM CST reply actions  

The sharp shooter was his finish

but he did the figure four, didn’t he?

I’m not that old am I? A little help here from a wrestling afficionado.

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota

"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."

by Ted Glover on Dec 30, 2010 5:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought

it was Marlon Brisco (cir. 1970’s – Brisco brothers – Marlon was Champ – funny thing was that he was only about 200 lbs and lean), Yeah I’m showing my age, but the 70’s had some real characters…Pac Song – aka the death grip, dusty rhodes, the original “American Dream Baby”, and Andre The Giant. LOL.

by NCviking on Dec 31, 2010 2:59 PM CST up reply actions  

sure lots guys did figure fours

i just figuerd if someone were to referance brett hart they would use the move he was famous for not just a random move

by favre4204ever on Jan 5, 2011 2:10 PM CST up reply actions  

i enjoyed your fanpost, good comments.

i want to see joe webb start against the lions. i think he earned it. i think brett might not be active anyway. i wonder if he will get the quiet send off as part of the deal for the whole “whatz-her-face” scandal.

i don’t know why some people think webb was a bust against chicago. i thought he trew some sweet passes, just some were defended well and a few clanked off the wr’s hands. he threw some away, but i thought that was wise. he showed that he can face pressure and not get rattled. he even showed that he can sidestep the d-rush and make people miss (inlike t-jack).

i thought he did great against the eagles and showed poise, playmaking ability and leadership. he definately threw some great passes and i thought he executed and sold his play action fakes well and rolled out beautifully. he extended several plays with his intangible abilities (stutter stepping), and we won the darn game!!!

i hope he starts, cuz he is exciting to watch, and it will probably give us more to be excited about for next season. and if he stinks it up, then at least we know now, before going into the off-season.

in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.

by jethrophet on Dec 30, 2010 3:53 PM CST reply actions  

I'm in the camp that says

Fix the O-Line first. Webb should have an honest chance to compete for starter next year. I think he has all the tools and as so many have commented on he has the mental aspect that TJ was missing. I am not saying TJ was dumb, hell Terry Bradshaw was so dumb he couldn’t spell CAT if you spotted him the C and A (I can’t remember who said that but it is true). But Bradshaw had the football smarts that allowed him to be a SB winning QB. Joe Webb just seems to have it. What it is, I can’t define, but based on what I have seen so far JW has it.

Fix the O-line and secondary and with the other talent we have and a 3rd place schedule and we should go far next year. At least that is my dream and I am sticking to it.

SKOL

by SouthernNorseman on Dec 30, 2010 4:28 PM CST reply actions  

And lets not forget about Kevin Kolb

I’m sure the Eagles will trade him sometime in the offseason or release him. He might be a free agent im not sure.

But if we get Kevin Kolb i dont think we’d have to draft QB at all. Just use all of the picks on oline and getting younger on defense.

by vikesfan4lyf on Dec 30, 2010 4:57 PM CST reply actions  

This is not an ordinary QB draft class

There are at least four guys coming out in this draft, maybe more, that could be excellent NFL players. Aside from Andrew Luck, who is as much a “sure thing” as I’ve seen in years, there’s Cam Newton, Ryan Mallet, and Jake Locker, any of whom look like probable star quarterbacks.

Look, I know my opinion doesn’t count for squat, but I’ve been watching some video highlights of these guys, and they don’t look like ordinary college quarterbacks. They look like dominant professionals toying with college defenses. Andrew Luck looks like Peyton Manning with a smoother delivery. Mallet looks like another Ben Rothlisberger. Locker looks like a right-handed Steve Young. Newton looks like a bigger, faster Steve McNair.

I just don’t see how you pass up a class of guys with this much potential, then hope for another guy of this magnitude next year.

In 1983, six quarterbacks were drafted in the first round. Of those six, three were Hall of Famers (Elway, Kelly, Marino), one started in a Pro Bowl (O’Brien), and the others (Blackledge and Eason) were excellent quarterbacks. The last QB taken in the first round was Dan Marino, who went 27th.

By the way, I couldn’t believe the Vikings didn’t draft Marino. I saw him play for the Pittsburg Panthers, and for him, a 15-yard pass was like a hand-off. Zang! But they did get Joey Browner, an all-pro safety.

In 1984, there were no quarterbacks taken in the first round. Well, technically there was Steve Young, but he went to Tampa in a separate USFL/CFL draft to the NFL. My point is, these things can run very hot and very cold. The 2011 draft is going to be very, very hot for quarterbacks. Possibly legendary. Whether or not they think Joe Webb will grow into a competent NFL starter, the Vikings would be absolutely retarded to pass up on quarterbacks that look as good as the class coming out next April. Take one of these guys – any of them – and enjoy the ride!

by jimbo55403 on Dec 30, 2010 5:13 PM CST reply actions  

But seriously...

I don’t think we’re in a tough position at all. What we need to do is act as if Webb weren’t there. We draft a hotshot QBOTF, add a veteran, and let Webb compete with them all. Even if Webb plays well against the Lions, that will put him at two good performances. Serious NFL franchises don’t lean on that kind of unknown. Relying on a guy picked at the end of round 6 after a couple of games in which he showed good poise and athleticism is a bit Childress-like. Let’s not forget that Webb has yet to THROW an NFL TD. That’s what we want QBs to do after all.

I’m not wizzing on his performances—and I hope he ends up being the next Tom Brady—but we can’t put the fate of the franchise in his hands like this. That wouldn’t be fair to us or him. It’s too much pressure.

There are too many good QBs in the upcoming draft and we’re picking relatively high. It would be nuts to pass on them for Joe Webb after what little we’ve seen of him.

by Bodysuit Man on Dec 30, 2010 5:16 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

What is Webb's upside?

Among things not discussed much about Joe Webb is his upside. If everything goes well (and that’s a lot of things), who would you compare Joe Webb to? Randall Cunningham? Warren Moon? Joe Montana?

There has to be some sort of vision of what Joe Webb could become, other than a fast rookie with a pretty good arm. Then you have to figure out, who is going to train Joe Webb to realize his potential? Do the Vikings even have a quarterbacks coach with a successful track record, that is, a coach that has taken a rookie and trained him to be a good starter?

It’s not just Joe Webb that’s a giant question mark. It’s also the Vikings coaching staff that will need to prove their worth over the next few seasons.

by jimbo55403 on Dec 30, 2010 6:10 PM CST reply actions  

From what I am reading

Neither Luck or Newton are coming out this year. Newton probably will depending on the outcome of the BCS game.

On an unrelated note, does anyone know which conferences we play next year? This year was AFC East and NFC South (by final standings).

by SouthernNorseman on Dec 30, 2010 7:23 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Our schedule is basically set

Depending on whether we finish third or fourth in the division. If we lose to Detroit on Sunday, I believe that we finish fourth because Detroit will have a better divisional record than us.

But here’s what we’re looking at for next year. . .

Home: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, New Orleans, Tampa Bay, Denver, Kansas City, and either Arizona or San Francisco (depending on divisional finish)
Away: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Atlanta, Carolina, Oakland, San Diego, and either Washington or Dallas (depending on divisional finish)

Here’s a site that has schedules all the way out to 2017.

http://www.johnnyroadtrip.com/schedules/nfl_future_nfcn.htm

SBNation Minnesota - For the greatest sports fans in the world.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!

by Christopher Gates on Dec 30, 2010 7:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Hmmm...

I don’t see a loss on the schedule!!

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota

"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."

by Ted Glover on Dec 30, 2010 7:40 PM CST up reply actions  

So....Saints are coming to town?

I gotta save some money for this one.
When do I start Operation Brees’ Knees on DN?
There are so many thoughts in my head right now.

by izziefans on Dec 31, 2010 4:17 AM CST up reply actions  

I see 12 wins there easily.

And that’s not being overly optimistic.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 8:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Hell yes I finaly get to see my boys play again in SanDiego I saw them last time they were there I think in 03 SKOL!!!!

by cali viking on Dec 30, 2010 8:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Uh

Where is “Home”?

by abba7 on Dec 31, 2010 12:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Tasty

Don’t really want to play NFC South, but I’m liking the AFC West matchup.

by Arif Hasan on Dec 31, 2010 2:35 AM CST up reply actions  

Forgot we played NFC east also this year

Just checked last year we played NFC West and AFC North. So I guess we will play NFC South and either AFC South or West

by SouthernNorseman on Dec 30, 2010 7:39 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

I think Newton leaves because

if he stays the allegations can get worse. If he goes Pro, no one really cares.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 30, 2010 8:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with you Ted 100%

Besides, at 6-9, we’ve probably put ourselves in a position where, even if (heaven forbid) we lose to Detroit, we won’t be drafting high enough to get a blue-chip QB anyway (especially since Andrew Luck is strongly considering staying in school, and Cam Newton is also considering staying). So, let’s go with Webb and a veteran on a 2-year deal, give Joe every shot to earn the starting job next year and if he craters, we will have a better shot at getting our QBOTF in 2012. Whereas if Webb performs extremely well in ‘11, we’ll know we have our guy.

Now that Brad Childress is gone, the BCS needs to follow.

by Td1984 on Dec 30, 2010 9:16 PM CST reply actions  

From what I saw on Tuesday

Joe Webb had a ridiculously easy game plan and managed to manage the game, limit mistakes and not turn the ball over. He basically proved he can be a running version of Kyle Orton. Webb didn’t look like a QB that can win you games, but did look like one that won’t lose you many games. To win a Super Bowl with Joe Webb, you’re going to need an outstanding defense (like the 2000 Ravens or ’85 Bears) and an outstanding running game. I say if the Vikings can get Ryan Mallett or Cam Newton, they should jump at the chance. If not, take someone else and bring in a solid veteran (i.e. not Sage Rosenfels) to compete with Webb for the job.

The Colorado Rockies aren't a team, they're an armada.

by free7694 on Dec 30, 2010 10:59 PM CST reply actions  

Depending on what's available...

… I’d say that we should go for OL early in the draft and sign a vet who is willing to mentor Webb (and maybe Archer/Bomer too)

A major worry with Webb is that he didn’t play as QB for his whole college career (at least one season he was a receiver) and even then he wasn’t up against top line defences. Can he learn how to read the defensive schemes in time? Maybe. Vick seemed to be much better this year as a pocket passer than I thought he ever would be, though T-Jack didn’t seem to have made any progress (which at least raises the amusing idea that you’re better off in prison than learning from Childress…)

If some of those QBs come up in the slot though, I’m not sure it wouldn’t be worth seeing if a trade could be organised to pick up a few more draft picks. That said, we’ve drafted well in the Spielman era (and I guess now we find out if Childress was a major factor too) so hopefully it’ll pan out however they decide to use the picks

by ViolentSilence on Dec 31, 2010 7:53 AM CST reply actions  

Matthew Stafford

Something I meant to include here:

We can see in Detroit that they’ve got an extremely talented QB, but an o-line that is getting him hurt. From what I’ve read of David Carr, he was talented coming out of college but the Houston line virtually let the talent get sacked out of him. I’m not sure that if we draft a QB, something similar might happen again.

by ViolentSilence on Dec 31, 2010 8:14 AM CST up reply actions  

And I'll say this again...

you can’t build the entire O-line and ‘then’ draft a QB. By the time you spend 3+ years building the line in the NFL, they’ll all be gone due to FA.

It’s not an “either-or” thing. You find the best player available, when he’s available. If that’s an O-lineman, fine. But you don’t reach for one. And you don’t pass up a QB either.

Stafford actually wasn’t hit nearly as often as people on here are saying he was this year either. It was just one bad, nasty shot. That can happen to anyone, anytime. Even with a very good O-line (see Tom Brady’s knee injury).

Now Houston chose the never address their O-line, and that was stupid. But you can’t just say, “Well, if we spend 3 years of drafting O-lineman, everything will be set up to take a QB then.” No coach will wait that long either, as they’ll be sacked before then.

by Shawn Gillogly on Dec 31, 2010 9:10 AM CST up reply actions  

1 draft

Can seriously improve an o-line. It’s only the Left Tackles that are first rounders generally, right tackles can be found further down with the guards and maybe centres. If you’re taking 3 years purely on o-line, that’s just as big a mistake. I was thinking more of Stafford in last season in to this.

That’s why I wouldn’t mind trading down in the first to pick up some more picks in the 2nd and 3rd if possible, if we can’t get the left tackle spot sorted. I wonder if Detroit would try the same, they’re getting very close to being a real problem in the division…

by ViolentSilence on Dec 31, 2010 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Coaching can evidently do the same

Chicago’s line seems to be playing way over their heads.

I agree that you don’t go all line and then get your QB. QB is the most important position on the field. We take it less seriously than all but about three teams in the NFL at this point. Hopefully that will change. I don’t think many teams would go blindly into next season with a Joe Webb-type as the plan.

by Bodysuit Man on Jan 1, 2011 10:51 AM CST up reply actions  

I think the team may carry 4 QBs next year

with the probable 18 game schedule and the expansion of the roster to about 58 players, it could mean that teams want 4 QBs.

Right now the Vikings have Webb, Bomar, Archer, & Favre.

Next year I would be OK with Webb starting.

If they can get a veteran to back him up then that would be nice too. Then they can keep the other two as developmental guys.

They also can draft another QB this year. Probably around round 4 or 5.

The problem is the Vikings have other needs too.

IMO, if the get the offensive line upgraded they can utilize their biggest weapon and that is AP!

Whoever the QB is will not have and should not have to do too much.

by MarkSP18 on Dec 31, 2010 11:08 AM CST reply actions  

A team with a starter can draft a 4th or 5th rounder

A team that needs a starter had better try a little harder.

by Bodysuit Man on Jan 1, 2011 10:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Draft the QB First

Unless we are 100% certain that Webb is the QBotF, AND either Bomar or Archer is going to pan out as a reliable backup, the answer has to be No.

Normally I agree with most of the stuff you say, Ted, but this time I have to cut against the grain.

It comes down to where the Vikings are in the standings this year, versus where we’re be in the years to come. We aren’t likely to post a record this bad, next year. If for no other reason, then because our sucky record means we’ll have a lighter season next year which means next year’s draft picks will be much lower. Then, if we need to get a top-rated QB, we’ll have to pay a seriously high price. We could end up losing one of the cornerstones of the franchise in trying to jump high enough to grab a decent prospect QB if we wait til next year.

This year is our best chance to grab a top-rated QB. We let this go, we’ll be drafting long-shot QBs and playing with everyone else’s cast-offs for years to come.

Let’s say Webb is the Anointed One, the QBotF.

Praying that T-Jack is gone, Favre is retiring, that leaves us with Webb, Bomar, and Archer, going into next year. Even we get McNabb or some other competent vet, we still need a good development guy behind Webb. So what if we end up with two top-rated QBs in the stable? We can trade one of them for a 1st round draft pick and then some, it’s not like it goes to waste. Worst case scenario, we have QB-insurance for a few years where we don’t have to freak out if our #1 guy gets injured.

Either way, it makes sense to grab the best available QB with our #1 pick this year.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Dec 31, 2010 3:16 PM CST reply actions  

agreed.

Or at least you don’t lock in to O-line and blow off QB. If there’s a run @ Qb ahead of us, then fine, take what you can. But don’t sit there with blinders on and let a quality QB slide by AGAIN.

by Shawn Gillogly on Jan 1, 2011 6:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Still need a backup

Even if Webb is the guy for next year, Favre and Tvaris will be gone…we need more than 1 qb. Most teams have 3 on a roster. I suggest drafting a qb, one who will be a perennial challenger for the starting position. The second qb can come from the free agency market, a mentor. Then you need to look at the oline before the defense. I don’t care how great qb’s are, if they don’t get 4 seconds to throw the ball, no receiver will be able to catch it. 2 draft picks on the oline. The rest can be for defensive line (1) Secondary (1). That’s 5 draft picks. There’s only 4 rounds. Obviously Chilly screwed us with the Moss Situation, so we won’t have but maybe 3 draft picks. The highest need right now is the Oline and Qb…use the 3 on them…the defense hasn’t been great this year, but we should be getting some guys back from injury, and the defense hasn’t been horrible. If we can stop using the prevent defense we should be ok there.

I would also give Frazier a 1 yr contract to prove himself. Let him put up his defense, as opposed to doing the best with what Chilly told him he was working with.

by Chris3 on Dec 31, 2010 4:00 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Secondary
Russian_arms_control_small
Season in Review: Chris Cook's Best and Worst performances in 2011
Biggun_small
1st New Vikes Stadium Image
Small
What got you hooked on the Daily Norseman?
Viking_flag_small
Viva Valhalla

Recent FanPosts

Small
Supplemental Draft and our Safety Situation
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Receivers and Tight ends
Grover_small
Purple Kool Aid - Oh Ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Photo_10_small
Percy Harvin and the 2012-13 Passing Game
Small
Jarred Allan VS DeMarcus Ware
It-could-work_small
Wait.....What? The MN Supreme Court Has To OK The Stadium?
Mv_runes_small
Any Given Vikings Sunday.
Viking_flag_small
The X Files
Biggun_small
What the Wilfs want in the Stadium

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Minnesota-vikings-logo_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall