Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

An Early Look at Vikings Free Agents

So, with a wrap on the 2009 season, it's time to look ahead to 2010 to see what awaits.  If you're laying money in Vegas, and you're a Vikings fan, the only bet you can lay down is $100 on 'torturous punch in the gut".  I almost feel like Clark Griswold in Vegas. 

But here at the Daily Norseman, we march on, like the French Army into Russia German Army into Stalingrad Charge of the Light Brigade hearty fans that we are.  Let's take a look at Free Agency, as in who will the Vikings free agents will be, and how an uncapped year affects who the Vikings can sign.

I'll discuss unrestricted free agents today, and restricted free agents tomorrow. 

Star-divide

With an uncapped year looming, the free agency rules really hamper the Vikings and the other three semi-finalists.  The final four teams

shall not be permitted to negotiate and sign any unrestricted free agent to a player contract except for players who acquired their status by being cut or were on the final four team when their contract expired. Playoff teams five thru eight get a break to sign one player with a salary of $4,925,000 or more and any number of players with a first-year salary of no more than $3,275,000 and an annual increase of no more than 30 percent in the following years.

 

There is a mechanism to permit the final eight teams to sign an unrestricted free agent for each one of their own unrestricted free agents who sign with another club as long as they don't spend more than what their own lost player received from his new club.   Pat Kirwan, NFL.com

So basically, the Vikings can re-sign their own unrestricted free agents and guys that became an unrestricted free agent by being cut.  That’s it.  However, there is one extra ‘transition’ tag available to teams as well, allowing for two.  So theoretically, the Vikings could franchise one guy and slap the transition tag on two guys.  For the players, both tags are about as popular as Rod Blagojevich right now, and I really don’t see the need for using it based on who’s potentially leaving.  To my knowledge, the rules regarding restricted free agents haven’t changed, so the Vikings get the right to match any offer given to a restricted free agent, or they get possible draft picks depending on the amount of the qualifying offer.  There is also no salary cap, as many of you know.  But what a lot of folks don’t know is that there is no salary floor, either.  So the NFL could look a lot like Major League Baseball in terms of the ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’.  It will be interesting to see what happens if no labor agreement is reached. 

But anyways, the Vikings are in a bind when it comes to signing marquee players because of the rules put in to try and prevent an uncapped season.  But when you look at the list of potential players available, it’s not that impressive.  So the Vikings need to look at who their unrestricted and restricted free agents are, and make a serious play to sign them.  So who are they, and what are the chances that they re-sign with the Vikings?

Unrestricted Free Agents:

Chester Taylor, RB—The best player the Vikings have about to hit the open market is Chester Taylor.  I am biased, but I love the way Taylor plays the game.  He isn’t flashy, he doesn’t have breakaway speed, but he does everything that’s asked of him, and he does it all very well.  When asked to be a premier back in 2006, he ripped off over 1,200 yards on an offensively inept team.  When asked to share time with a hotshot rookie, he did without bitching, and still got almost 900 yards rushing.  When asked to be a third down back and make a tough third down on a short swing pass or draw play, I defy you to find someone better at it than Chester Taylor in 2008-09.  He’s now north of the 30 year old line of doom, but he can still play at a high level, and I am sure he will draw interest from a few teams.  The trend in the NFL has been not to give big contracts to older RB’s, so I don’t know that there will be a lot of interest in Taylor.  I think the Vikings can definitely afford him, unless someone just backs up the money truck with a ton of money, which I don’t see happening.  But I can also see Taylor taking an equivalent amount of money to go elsewhere if given the opportunity to be a #1 back.  And if he does, I will tip my cap and wish him well, with no animus on my part.  Chances of Taylor returning:  50%.  

Artis Hicks, OL—Artis Hicks is the offensive line version of Chester Taylor.  Didn’t really blow you away when he started, but performed solidly, for the most part, and has been a valuable backup for the Vikings.  The main difference between Hicks and Taylor is position.  Hicks could be a serviceable starter for several teams, but age might be a concern.  Like Taylor, I think if Hicks gets a competitive offer to start somewhere, he’ll take it.  Chances of Hicks returning:  50%

Benny Sapp, CB—It’s well known (well, at least by the three of you that used to read my now-defunct blog) that I wasn’t a Benny Sapp fan, based on one nearly infamous incident.  That said, you can argue that re-signing Benny Sapp is priority #1 in the off-season.  Antoine Winfield might have a lingering foot issue, Cedric Griffin blew out his knee in the NFC Championship and won’t be available for the beginning of the season, which means your starting CB’s, if Sapp isn’t re-signed, could be Asher Allen and Karl Paymah.  Or Hussein Abdullah.  Or a bag of ass.  Sapp's value became inversely proportional the second Griff got hurt.  And truth be told, Sapp wasn't bad in 2009.  His coverage skills were okay as a nickel/emergency starter guy, and he didn't make any monumentally dumb penalties.  Getting Sapp back into the fold, and I think the Vikings will target him as such.  Chance of Sapp returning:  75%

Jimmy Kennedy, DT--Jimmy Kennedy was a solid defensive contributor for the Vikings in 2009, registering a career high in sacks and providing great depth at defensive tackle.  Kennedy was a bust as a #1 starter for the Rams, but seemed to find his stride under defensive line coach Karl Dunbar, and rotating out with Kevin and Pat Williams.  It remains to be seen whether or not other teams will look at Kennedy as a guy that's finally realizing his potential, or a guy that's doing well in a system that maximizes his talents and limits his liabilities.  With only one good year on the Vikings juxtaposed against five or six mediocre years elsewhere, I tend to think the latter, and retaining Kennedy won't be as difficult due to a small demand.  If Pat Williams does retire, the Vikings make a big push to get Kennedy in the fold.  Chance of Kennedy returning:  80%

Greg Lewis, WR--I think the Greg Lewis catch  was the moment when Vikings nation thought there was a feeling of destiny about this team.  It was for me, and it will go down as the moment fans of the purple bought in 100% to Favre (well, most of them).  It's an all-time great moment for a very storied franchise, and probably an all-time top 10 moment for just about everyone.  That said, it really was a moment in time, and Lewis was sparingly used by the Vikings.  I just don't see him coming back.  Guys like Lewis are a dime a dozen, and unless Chilly wants him back because of his Philly connections, he's gone.  Chance of Lewis coming back:  20% 

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

good article

Chester Taylor- I would love to have him back but I really think some other team will offer him a big contract despite his age(although he has low mileage compared to most backs his age).

Artis Hicks-I think he’ll get a nice contract offer from the vikes mainly because of lack of depth and his versatility. I’d like to have him back.

Benny Sapp-Resigning him should be a HUGE priority because of our extreme lack of depth at CB and the fact that he played really well this year. The game in NO was particularly impressive because the D-line wasn’t getting much pressure and Benny Sapp and Co still shut down the saints O.

Jimmy Kennedy-He played well whenever he got the chance this year. He is an intriguing option as the replacement of Phat Pat. I think he will resign.

Greg Lewis-He had the best catch for vikings this year but not much else. I’d rather use his spot to develop a young WR like Jaymar Johnson or Reynaud.

by All Day, All Night on Feb 10, 2010 6:32 PM CST reply actions  

have to disagree

Guys who make clutch catches in big moments are not a dime a dozen. They are key parts of a championship team. Lewis should have been used more this year. He makes big catches. He’s like Robert Horry.

by medicineball on Feb 10, 2010 6:59 PM CST reply actions  

I don’t know about THAT! Sure he made a big catch but he wasn’t brought in there for that. He was a role player…he’s no Robert Horry though. At least not yet.

by TrevorR on Feb 11, 2010 8:44 AM CST up reply actions  

David Tyree

does not agree with you. Was cut last year from the GIANTS….

by Jepp The Viking on Feb 11, 2010 1:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice breakdown

I think the Vikings will let Chester go. He made about 3.5 mil or so last year and I am sure that most of all he wants to get paid. I see the Vikings going with Young & Johnson if they have to.

Hicks is valuable but they may draft a youngster like John Jerry , Kyle Calloway, or Brandon Carter to backup the guards.

Sapp is probably going to be offered something decent for the reasons you described but I am hoping for 2 CBs out of this draft and by the 4th round. I would like to see the Vikings carry 6 corners next year and only 4 safeties.

Kennedy probably wants some tall cotton because he made some “hot film” this year. It will be interesting if he likes the offer he gets from the Vikings. Without him it does change the direction of the draft a bit.

Lewis is a player they can resign after the draft or even before training camp.

by MarkSP18 on Feb 10, 2010 7:02 PM CST reply actions  

Nice article and great job analyzing the Vikings situation.

If I might make one correction to your description of "tags.

So theoretically, the Vikings could franchise one guy and slap the transition tag on two guys. For the players

Not exactly correct from my reading of the CBA. A team can use 1 transition tag instead of a franchise tag on an Unrestricted free agent. They can also use a transition tag on any UFA or RFA. Its a total of two. Either one franchise tag and one transition or two transitions.

I don’t believe it can ever total up to three tags. But I have heard your theory before and could be reading it wrong.

Like you I don’t see any of our UFA players being “tagged”. A transition tag is a salary of average of highest ten at that position in the league. A franchise tag is the average of the top 5 at that position. I don’t think any of our UFA are top 10 at their position in the entire league.

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 11, 2010 6:28 AM CST reply actions  

In normal circumstances you are right

about the one franchise and one transition tag. But if the league goes to an uncapped year, teams get an extra transition tag.

"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."

--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre

by Ted Glover on Feb 11, 2010 4:30 PM CST up reply actions  

And I stand corrected

According to Florio at PFT, teams can use two tags, either a franchise and a transition, or two transition tags, but not two franchise tags. In normal years, teams can use either the franchise or the transition.

Link

May this now be clear as mud.

"We're used to Favre-a-palooza now. We're engulfed in Favre-a-palooza. It's not even Favre-a-palooza anymore. He's family now."

--Vikings TE Visanthe Shiancoe, on Brett Favre

by Ted Glover on Feb 11, 2010 6:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Thank God it only took me 5 times reading it to finally understand it.

I have seen this misprinted in many major publications. I finally just started reading the actual document myself and it became clearer. I am amazed at the intricacy of the labor contract. The 8 team rule only applies to Unrestricted Free agents not RFAs.
Players that are cut ,but still free agents, don’t fall under the 8 team rule.
Franchise tag players and transition tag players don’t fall under the 8 team rule.

This is going to be a real test for Spielman and the rest of the front office.

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 12, 2010 4:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Chester Taylor...

Perfect fit for… Philly. Catches the ball, good in protection… I’d love to see the Eagles steal him away. Also, as you noted, he is 30, but has low mileage on his tires with only 1,028 career carries. Compare that to a guy like Clinton Portis, who is 28, but has 2,176 career carries.

In an uncapped year, the Vikings would be foolish not to franchise him, even if that means way overpaying him for one season.

by JimmyK on Feb 11, 2010 7:14 AM CST reply actions  

Here is my idea of priority..

From biggest to least.
1)Benny Sapp (We hurt in Secondary)
2)C. Taylor (He was reliable, great for 3rd downs – having him as a 3rd down option as well as P. Harvin could be big).
3/4 – Tie) A. Hicks & J. Kennedy – I put these at a tie, because it really depends on P. Williams decision on retirement. If Pat stays, I think Hicks is the more important one to look at. We can always use someone to be a decent back up as it seems O-lines tend to take a beating.
5) Greg Lewis – Ya, he made that Catch….. And I am sure we all thank him for that, but, I think this gives potential interest to other teams to grab him. We never heard much of G. Lewis other than that. Did we not utilize him correctly? Did we not switch him in enough? Maybe.. But I think he’s the lest of our worries at the moment.

by Deek on Feb 11, 2010 8:51 AM CST reply actions  

Under Artis Hicks

It says Chances of Taylor returning.

Sapp has really came around in 2009. I was not a fan of his before this year and was pleasantly surprised by how well he played. Now that Griffen is injured, we NEED Sapp for 2010.

I think Taylor is gone. I’d rather he stayed, but I think he’ll be starting for someone else. At least we have a good group of young talent.

I think Kennedy has turned a corner and I’d make him a bigger priority than Hicks. Hicks is an aging utility guy that can be replaced in the draft and we still have Cook.

While G. Lewis impressed me, I think he just gets burried on the Viking depth chart. I don’t see him coming back.

Isn’t T. Jackson a free agent? I’m sure opinions differ on if he should be resigned. If he can be had for a reasonable contract I want to see him stay as I still think he has a chance to be the answer. It seems the Vikings have done everything possible to delay Jackson’s development. The next year he has a chance to start will be his last chance to avoid being a career back-up and I hope he is successful.

by ChemErik on Feb 11, 2010 9:22 AM CST reply actions  

Well let's see

I don’t think there will be any arguments on what you’ve said. However, :) I would put it in this order

Sapp (because pretty soon they’ll be throwing fans into the secondary)
Kennedy (because Pat will go soon)
Chester Taylor (This was a hard one, I want to keep him but AD is tight and we do have back up at this position)
Hicks – He’s a perenial back up that sees very little time on the field unless someone is injured.

Saying that I think Hicks and Kennedy will be the easiest to resign, Sapp shouldn’t be to difficult and the only one I think we’ll lose is Taylor which isn’t all bad as I think losing him will let us pick up a FA worth pretty good money.

It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...

by Grime on Feb 11, 2010 9:24 AM CST reply actions  

Great rundown! But Keep Chester Taylor.

Thanks, MCF, very nicely done :)

That being said, the only thing I disagree with (and with most of the other folks here at the DN, it seems), is on Chester Taylor.

I think the man is worth a 3 year contract because he plays at an amazingly high, productive level in clutch situations, consistently. He has much less wear and tear on him that another 30 year old back, thanks to AP, and because he can be relied on to rock the house, AP gets more and longer breathers and also has less wear and tear on him. The net result is a running game that’s got a better life expectancy and Chester Taylor is key to that.

Taylor is a keeper, if at all reasonably possible, and I’ve never heard him complain about ANYTHING on the Vikings. To me that says volumes about the man’s character and his value ‘in the lockerroom’ as a team player.

We lose Taylor, our running game drops a notch for at least a year, until if and when Albert Young steps up. I’ve seen Young do alright, but nothing close to Taylor’s level.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Feb 11, 2010 11:41 AM CST reply actions  

Albert Young is pretty decent but it will be years before he – or AD for that matter – can pass catch like Chester Taylor does.

"If you don't love it, leave it, USA #1" Ricky Stanzi

by cutlassbob on Feb 11, 2010 9:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Percy can catch like Chester and is obviously better once he gets the ball in his hands

With AP having more recieving yards than Taylor and Harvin in the mix they shouldn’t skip a beat without Taylor.

Hard one(loss) to swallow, thats what she said.

by VikesPma on Feb 13, 2010 12:48 PM CST up reply actions  

I think Chester comes back

Unless: 1. another team offers him sick money, which they won’t, cuz he’s 30+, or 2.) he has a chance to be the starter on another team, which I don’t think a team will give that option because recently a lot of teams have been successful with a rookie RB being thrown into the mix right away, and most teams are splitting time with 2 or 3 RB’s anyways. There’s no better RB talent-wise than AD, and I’m sure chester appreciates the benefits of being in an offense with that guy. Chester also fits so well in this offense and knows his role, and he’s comfortable. Change can add a lot of stress to a player going into a new offense. If the vikes offer comparable money to Chester, he’ll stay. and I think he will in fact come back.

by cdubs on Feb 11, 2010 11:48 AM CST reply actions  

Have to get Sapp back for sure, Hicks too.

With Percy Harvin, Albert Young and Adrian Peterson(who caught over 40 balls this year) they can make up for the loss of Taylor. I like Chester but I would have liked to see Harvin get more of Taylor’s carries this year. Harvin granted did have a lot to take in this year so I look for him to be a bigger part of the running game next year.

I wonder if the Vikes should look to replace RG Herrera in the draft or free agency? He looked terribly inconsistant this past season and didn’t manage to open many holes in the running game. The Vikes were too often getting stuffed on the right inside, Adrian would have almost no choice but to bounce it outside.

Side note: Berrian was looking much better the last few games this year as his speed and subsequent health improved much. If he comes in 100% next year the Vikings could pose one of if not the best trio of WRs in the NFL, Shiancoe too, oh my! Yeah I know it depends on who is throwing them the ball…

Hard one(loss) to swallow, thats what she said.

by VikesPma on Feb 11, 2010 2:52 PM CST reply actions  

Herrera is servicable

but, I think they’ll draft a RG in a mid to late round. He’s the kind of guy that makes you want to groom a replacement, not run out and find someone better immediately. Plus he only has one or two more years before age likely starts affecting his performance.

by ChemErik on Feb 12, 2010 10:50 AM CST up reply actions  

Very sensible statement Chem. Very sensible.

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 12, 2010 4:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Deathstarvikings_small
2012 Draft Player Rankings: Top 10 UPDATE 1.0

Recent FanPosts

Small
Vincent Jackson?
Deathstarvikings_small
Siefert's All NFC North Team
Beardy_small
What luck... A potential FA LT that is actually good...
Small
Vikings 2012 Starting Offensive Linemen
Vikings3_small
Patriots after Spygate, 4-4 in playoffs 0-2 in SB
Snickers_small
What I'll Be Doing Today (Super Bowl)
Sophialoren_janemansfield1_small
Interesting RGIII interview with Sports Illustrated
Small
Good News Everyone
Biggun_small
Vote:Patriots or Giants
Small
Feeling Lucky?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Kira_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall