Quarterbacks 2010 and 2011
The current quarterbacks as of Monday morning, August 30th, are:
Brett Favre, 40, under contract through 2010 season
Tarvaris Jackson, 27, under contract through 2010 season
Sage Rosenfels, 32, under contract through 2010 season
Joe Webb, 23, under contract for several years
With Favre as the starter, the next item of importance is backing him up. The Vikings have lacked offensive line continuity so far this year. John Sullivan is still trying to return from his calf injury. Favre's ankle still bothers him. He hasn't moved around the pocket quite as well as last year. It is of extreme importance to have backup quarterbacking that can do a good job.
Tarvaris Jackson appears likely to hold on to his second-string quarterback position. While he saw limited action against the Seahawks, he entered the game before Sage Rosenfels. Jackson has never failed to play hard on every play, has been criticized heavily by the fans and the media, and as the epitome of class, has taken his lumps and just kept working. In fact, he has worked very hard. I don't remember him saying anything negative, at least in public. Everyone considers him a good teammate. From various accounts, I have gained the impression that the game has slowed down for him, and he reads defenses. He is improving on his touch passes. The only thing holding him back at this point is a lack of confidence in himself. Jackson plays great in practice. But his lack of confidence exposes itself on the field in game situations. It has got to be tough to have confidence when most fans, the entire media, and even many of his teammates seem to not believe in you. Maybe confidence is something that can grow over time, or maybe not. After he gains confidence, he will evolve into a strong team leader.
We have seen many quarterbacks struggle in their early years, and then a light goes on, and they play great. Rich Gannon was a Viking in his early career. Vikings fans got frustrated with him. Then Denny Green moved on, tossing out the years of investment the Vikings had made in Rich Gannon's development. Gannon went on to a terrific second-half of his career. Not only did he win the MVP award, he led his team to a Super Bowl. When Steve Young started with the NFL, he was a punching bag in a Buccaneers uniform. When he arrived in San Francisco, the fans disliked him. He improved, and now his bust sits in the Hall of Fame.
The Vikings have invested in Tarvaris Jackson's development, and it would be the wrong decision to let some other team have a young quarterback whose light is about to turn on. The Vikings should extend Tarvaris Jackson's contract for a few years, and keep him as the #2 quarterback.
In past years, Tarvaris Jackson was injured from time to time. Could he be injury-prone?
What if, Heaven forbid, Favre goes down? And then, it gets worse, and Jackson goes down?
Sage Rosenfels was the #3 quarterback last year. This year he is much improved, but still can't seem to overtake Jackson on the depth chart. He doesn't have the arm strength of Favre or Jackson, but as a 10-year veteran, he has seen it all. He is a good, solid veteran quarterback who knows the offense and his fellow Vikings players. If called upon, he could do a good job for the Vikings, and could potentially be good enough to lead them into and through the playoffs.
Current fourth-string quarterback Joe Webb has a great deal of potential. By all accounts, however, he is just too raw to play quarterback in the NFL right now. No one can deny his physical talents. Will he mature into a successful NFL quarterback? Only time will tell.
In addition to Favre, which quarterbacks will make it to the Vikings' 53-man roster? The Vikings simply must keep both Jackson and Rosenfels. They are both necessary because in this season, with our offensive line, with Favre's ankle, with the quality of opposing teams on the schedule this year, and with the great potential this team has for a playoff and championship run, we simply need to have both quarterbacks backing up Favre. Let's keep Jackson and Rosenfels on the roster.
As for Joe Webb, he can be kept if there is room for a fourth quarterback. If not, he can be moved to the practice squad. If he wouldn't last there, then we should trade him. This is sad, but trading a player the Vikings have invested little in makes more sense than trading a Jackson or Rosenfels who currently have a lot of Purple investment.
Do not be tempted by Joe Webb's potential in the future, and think we should trade or cut Jackson or Rosenfels. The grass always looks greener on the other side of the fence. Our job is to stay here and work hard to make our grass the best it can be.
Now, as for the 2011 quarterback situation, it is foreseeable that Favre will finally, sadly retire. Both Jackson and Rosenfels should be signed now to contract extensions. If we are fortunate enough to still have Joe Webb, that will make three quarterbacks coming into camp. Additionally, the Vikings should draft a young quarterback they like. I would like to see the Vikings draft Greg McElroy out of Alabama, as he not only has good mechanics, he has the habit of winning. The young draft pick, plus the top two quarterbacks out of Jackson, Rosenfels, and Webb, would probably survive the cuts to make the 53-man roster in the 2011 season. (If there is no 2011 season, then just push that to the 2012 season).
This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.
186 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Are you insane ???
Webb will need to be traded?? We have Tarvaris on a one year tender . They have shown equal effectiveness in the pre-season . We need to weigh the value of TJ and Sage . Then move on with one . When Brett’s ankle procedure not surgery is secured . Ignore the ESPN hype man ! Deal with a little reality . Other than that a good piece .
I will live with either . The FO did well to create this dilema . It is time to reap the rewards …
Brett also may stay two more years just as well .
I agree that a first round QB may be in order even if a McNabb comes our way . I like Luck from Stanford .
by gothicpurple on Aug 30, 2010 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions
brett might not make it through this year (don't kill me for saying that, please).
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
mcnabb
yes..i was almost disappointed that vikes didnt make a play for mc5 in the offseason, but i see they couldnt while waiting for 4.. as soon as this season is over though, i say they immediately diffuse any BF@42 talk and sign mcnabb if available..
this would also necessitate moving TJ or SR.. as they would see the writing on the wall that they will never be deemed quality starter by the org..
so for this scenario, i say keep webb now..
"the following statement is true:
the preceding statement was false" - george carlin
by BranFavrenton on Aug 31, 2010 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions
Sage? Much improved?
You must not be watching the same games I am watching.
I see a guy who under throws every single pass longer than 20 yards. We all know he knows the playbook and can stand in the pocket and look like a QB, but he can’t seem to get those balls over the defender.
That said, they are showcasing Sage by having him throw a bunch of go-routes against 3rd stringers. Not exactly a difficult thing to do.
Sage gets traded. It is that simple. There is no reason to keep him on the roster considering his salary relative to TJack and Webb and there is no way we are not keeping Webb.
I see exactly what you've been seeing.
Sage goes and hopefully we get a backup O-lineman for him.
by CanadianViking on Aug 30, 2010 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions
It IS smart...
Despite your hatred for Tjack, he is the most logical player to keep. He is inexpensive, knows the system, can run the ball if needed and has shown he can play the backup role quite well.
Sage is worth less to us, and we can probably get around the same value were we to trade Tjack or Sage. It makes the most sense from a business perspective and a football perspective.
Besides, it is not me making the decision, it is pretty obvious that is the Viking’s plan. Are you calling the Vikings stupid?
Honestly I'm not a big TJ fan
I know you’re all shocked. But really Sage has shown nothing this preseason. He just doesn’t have an arm. I hate to say it, but his passes would never make it in a real game. As well he has the mobility of a snow man. That’s not a horrible thing until you look at the seive we call a line.
No as much as I hate to admit it we need to move Sage. Keep TJ work on Webb and pick up Locke or McElroy next year.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Do my eyes decieve me? Did you say Keep Tarvaris Jackson?
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
I'm gonna cry. Did you hear Grime say keep T-Jack. OMG
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
Before you get crazy
You have to realize that yes it did hurt. ALOT. But when you look at what we have on tap… Yeah it’s the old no win situation… Classic…
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Wow.
Who are you and what have you done with Grime? Seriously, I agree with everything you said in your comment and not just because I like TJ. Sage has put up numbers against third stringers and his passes wouldn’t work against any kind of real defense. I’m also onboard with your suggestion of keeping TJ, Webb, and drafting a QB in the first round next year. I’m still holding out hope for TJ’s development but keeping Webb and getting a 1st round QB next year is a smart way of providing insurance in case TJ stays at the same level.
by CanadianViking on Sep 1, 2010 8:54 PM CDT up reply actions
I have been assimilated.
We are borg I am Grimlucius
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Maybe now you'll have a better shot at Jeri Ryan : )
by CanadianViking on Sep 3, 2010 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm not sure who that is CV
Also, you act like you never agree with anything I say. I would of course hope that’s not correct as I think of you as reasonably intelligent and of course being that way you’d agree with me most of the time. : D
As opposed to LLV who is a raving nutjob.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Jeri Ryan is the Borgiest with the Mostest
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Google her
She’s a blonde with a ridiculous body that played a borg in a catsuit on Star Trek. I agree with both you and LLV plenty. I have a bad habit of getting into QB debates though, and backing TJ is like saying an ugly chick is really nice : )
by CanadianViking on Sep 3, 2010 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions
However,
…even though I agree with much of your assessment, I notice some loopholes.
If Thigpen never ran thought the entire Niner’s defense from midfield and couldn’t make it to the Viking practice squad, then Webb’s chances of getting to the promised land are slim and none, and none just caught a fast train to Green Bay.
The problem with a Viking trade at this stage of the year is that the teams most in need of a backup QB are also the teams sitting up front on the wavier wire ranking, so why would they not take their chances of getting any Viking QB for nothing in exchange to the Vikes? Most of the QB starters won’t play this week and are unlikely to be struck down by the runaway beer trucks that would necessitate a trade before the final cuts come.
The Vikings actually have too much talent overall. There is not room on the roster for an extra QB (or even an extra kicker who can’t force a few touchbacks) when you have to cut someone who is guaranteed to make another team or possibly even start somewhere.
Drafting a QB rarely results in immediate results. Matt Ryan is more the exception than the rule. More often you get Matt Leinart or someone else whom it takes years to develop. Awaiting the messiah often turns out to be waiting for Godot, a lot of talk and no action.
Getting Favre and having him still be great was a longshot, so the Plan B was acquiring Sage, a sage decision which also points out that all blessings also bring curses. Anyone who can count to 53 knows that the Vikings will be cutting someone valuable; they just don’t know who it is.
Sage Rosenfels salary is two million. Tarvaris Jackson’s is about a quarter of that, and Sage is probably not four times as good as Jackson.
Que sera sera, whatever will be will be. The odds are not great that there will be a 2011 NFL season, at least not one involving anyone we’ve mentioned so far. In 2012, the Vikings might be in LA.
Sage is pumped up over that Javon Walker TD throw in part because he knows he’s auditioning for a job somewhere, and if he gets traded, he’ll get the two million. He also knows he might also get the dreaded CBA Appendix G letter, saying his contract has been terminated immediately because “In the judgment of the Club, your skill or performance has been unsatisfactory as compared with that of other players competing for positions on the Club’s roster.”
Or as an old guy once said, “Dem’s da breaks, hit da bricks.”
Not so true on backup QBs . IND , GB , CHI , NYG , WAS , Oak .......they are not all in front .
To much talent ??? When you account for a strong ST . It does stir the roster .
Both QBs have the same grade vs. poss. backup wins . Value in a trade may sway the decision . Most teams want a young guy at this point in the season . Did you see CHI struggle to get a vet to sign for a short stint .
The analysists see Sage as a top ten backup . You have your head screwed on to tight . Remember that the role of a backup is to minimize mistakes and salvage a win or two . Not rack up probowl stats or pick apart the Jets defense . I see you have hit several bricks yourself ! Dust off and remember . They are backups for a reason .
by gothicpurple on Aug 31, 2010 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions
Enough
Do you want to win years from now, or now?
If Favre and Jackson are both injured, Rosenfels can come in, manage games, and win games. Joe Webb cannot.
Thus, Webb is the odd man out. If he goes to the practice squad, fine. If he doesn’t remain a Viking, that really sucks, but it’s what we have to do.
We are all about 2010 and winning games this year.
If Favre and Jackosn both get injured?
If both QBs go down it’ll take a lot more than Sage Rosenfels to allow us to go on a Super Bowl run. I’m a TJ fan and I’d still be skeptical of him winning more than one playoff game for us. If we’re about winning this year than a quality backup O-lineman has much more chance of contributing to our team than Sage.
by CanadianViking on Aug 30, 2010 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions
If Brees and his backup . Then Romo/Kitna . Then Rodgers/Flynn .
We would crush them all . The Chopper assault would be devastating . And Dilfer will still be the biggest Bozo to win the big game !
by gothicpurple on Aug 31, 2010 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions
Well, I'd kind of like to win games years from now too..
and honestly, the likelyhood of Favre AND Jackson getting taken out of action for the whole year seems kind of slim to me. Not to mention the fact that the FO obviously feels confident enough in Webb to keep him at QB, even when we had WR issues, so they must like what they see. If you have a QB like that, you keep the 4th roster spot.
I’m not comparing Webb to Brady, but it was a similar situation for him. The Pats already had Bledsoe and 2nd and 3rd string QBs, but they liked what they saw out of Brady, who was a no-name QB at the time, and they kept his 4th string ass on that roster.
The real question is . Which teams could Tarvaris beat Vs. Which teams could Sage beat
TJ beat GB and has a slight edge . As Childress said . TJ has shown advancement in practice . He is the guy they see as the best . A slight edge isn’t enough for me if the trade value is right . I will be happy with either . I’d keep both until week # 6 . G. Mills will be on IR in no time and the whole debate can be settled .
by gothicpurple on Aug 31, 2010 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions
still waving the Gannon flag, eh?
I agree… it finally ‘clicked’ for Gannon and he was already on a different team when it happened.
But that is no guarantee that it is going to click for Jackson.
You are right in your assessment… he lacks confidence. You can see it in his eyes during the game.
…he fact that you CAN SEE his eyes during the game is the give-away! the kid looks terrified at times.
But [rainbows, unicorns, and glitter] he’s ours for the 2010-11 season… and let’s hope if finally clicks for him.
He should be beyond the confidence issues by now, but I don’t care… IF he has to play, I just want him to be serviceable.
Personally, I think it’s time for Sage to go for a draft pick and we keep Webb. That kid is an athlete.
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Aug 30, 2010 6:41 PM CDT reply actions
So if Webb starts four games this year, and we are in a race to win it all, that’s OK?
by medicineball on Aug 30, 2010 6:42 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd keep them all if it were up to me...
but we know these clowns won’t/can’t.
Sage is serviceable, but I’d put Jackson out there ahead of him…
and yeah… if #4 and #7 both go down… then I would want Webb over Sage.
He wouldn’t be the ‘safe bet’ by any stretch – keeping Sage would be the conservative call.
But I am for winning this year so throw caution to the wind and go BIG!
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Aug 30, 2010 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions
[[RINGGGG]]....[[RINGGGGG]]
Brad? Brad Childress? Yeah, you’re the one I was trying to reach! We never really got a chance to meet, but I admired your work with Philly! Yeah, yeah, great stuff! I’m Jeff, Jeff George, and I hear you might need some highly experienced quarterback help in the near future. Well, I just wanted you to know, I’m your man. Oh yeah, that’s me. Did you know that I once played in Atlanta too, before the Vikings practically begged me to come play for them. Well, guess what!?! I still have my old jersey! It’s a bit tight around the middle, but you could save some money if I bring it with me! No, no, I wouldn’t mind giving some pointers to that young kid, Jackson. I was the one who taught Cunningham EVERYTHING he knows! Yeah, that was me! Anyway, grab a pen, I’ll give you my number and you can call me in a few weeks, we’ll make it look like I was holding out for months, great PR! Oh, ready? ….. Brad? …. Hello? … Hello? Brad, you there? …. Damned cell phone, must be passing through a dead spot…
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
by DCPurple on Aug 31, 2010 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions 3 recs
GROAN! but not outside the realm of possibility when ‘going big’, right?
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Aug 31, 2010 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions
don't worry, he's got brooks fiedler waiting in the wings, we're set.
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
Rec'd
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Aye rec'd indeed
Was funny last year listening you JG talk about how he was better than 60% of the QB’s playing currently. All I could think of was he wasn’t even that good in his prime.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Sage is signed through 2011
This is from rotoworld.com …
2/27/2009: Signed a three-year, $9 million contract. The deal included a $1.4 million signing bonus. 2010: $2.6 million, 2011: $3 million, 2012: Free Agent
… so he is he one that they are ensured will be on the roster in 2011.
TJack is the QB that they have to worry about being able to resign. Many feel he will just sign on the dotted line because he is happy to be with the Vikings. I have serious doubts about that.
They exposed him to the free agent market and only offered him a deal that was 110% of his previous year’s salary. Combine that with the fact that Sage is making more than twice as much for two years (after this year) and I think you can expect he would feel some disrespect.
If they trade or release Sage then it is a much bigger gamble than letting TJack go. If they do not resign TJack, Favre retires, and they trade Sage then they could be up the creek without a paddle next year and the team still will be good.
It is a curious strategy that the front office is employing in regards to the QB position in 2011. All that we know at this moment in time is that Sage & Webb are signed beyond 2010.
If we keep Jackson, and he doesn’t re-sign, we could end up with a supplementary draft pick. (Assuming those will continue to exist in the next labor deal.)
I hope we get him re-signed.
by medicineball on Aug 31, 2010 6:29 AM CDT up reply actions
That is a very limited argument.
Supplemental draft picks are assigned based on how many free agents a team loses and how many they sign. Then the player is assigned value based on his contribution to the team. A back-up anything will probably be a 7th round supp pick at best.
For everyone who wants to trade Sage please answer me one question. Who is going to QB this team next year? T-Jack is a free agent. Farve is retired. Webb isn’t ready.
Are you willing to bring a veteran off the street to lead this team next year?
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 6:42 AM CDT up reply actions
Trade Sage and extend TJ.
You might say that Jackson won’t re-sign with us but what other team in the league would give him a starting job, much less a starting job on one of the most talented teams in the league? Jackson will be our starter next year with Webb and hopefully a high first round pick behind him.
by CanadianViking on Aug 31, 2010 8:11 AM CDT up reply actions
But that is not an answer.
It is a hope. A FO must make decisions based on what he knows. Not on what he hopes, doesn’t he? Until T-Jack is extended I can’t get my head around trading Sage.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 8:24 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree 100%
There are many who believe that TJack will realize he is not wanted elsewhere and just sign for whatever the Vikings offer. Hopefully these same people do not then claim that he is the QBOTF.
The fact is it is a gamble. If I am TJack, I am testing the market. After everything he has been through he probably will want to see if a team is going to give him a shot.
But your point is correct in that you do not risk the fate of the rest of the team on an unknown (i.e., getting TJack to sign an extension) at the most important position on the team.
It is a strange strategy that Chilly is employing IMHO.
I'm assuming the FO knows more than we do.
In the event that they decide to trade Sage they won’t be short-sighted and ignore the fact that TJ doesn’t have an extension. One move logically works with the other. Before the FO trades Sage they will approach TJ with an extension. If for some reason TJ doesn’t want a raise and an extension than the FO would most likely back off of any Sage trade.
We’re dealing with opinions here so everything we fans state is generally a form of hope and not a fact. Also, if we plan on trading Sage it would be a very bad idea to announce that we’re planning on extending TJ as it would only drive Sage’s price tag lower.
by CanadianViking on Aug 31, 2010 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions
This is true and a possibility
But the fact is that as of right now, TJack does not have an extension.
And one could argue that once they do trade Sage, that then TJack will have even more leverage and could ask for more money since now he will have the upper hand.
Or they could get TJack to sign without announcing it and then trade Sage. I do not know if TJack’s agent will go for this unless TJack is getting a pretty good deal.
All suppositions and theories I suppose.
To me, the fact they exposed him to the free agent market at all speaks volumes about how they really feel. Why would they take that chance? If they really, truly wanted him as the QBOTF they would have at least put the 1st round tender on him but they couldn’t because they put the first round tender on Edwards. They can only have one player at each tender level.
I am not sure that the Vikings are sure about TJack.
Yeah it's basically a trade scenario.
TJ getting an extension this year is largely dependent on trading Sage. My reasoning is that if an offer is made for Rosenfels that the Viking’s like they will try to work out an extension with TJ before pulling the trigger. In my scenario both the trade and TJs extension would be announced to the public within a day or two of each other so no leverage would be lost on either deal.
As for TJ being exposed to free agency I view it a little differently. They placed an original round tender on TJ so he got paid at a second round tender but compensation was set at a third rounder because of Evans getting a second round tender. Remember, the Vikings always retained the right to match any offer sheet signed by Jackson so I don’t see the tender as really having that much significance.
You are right that it’s hard to figure out how sure the Vikings are about Jackson as there commitment to him seems to be in flux.
by CanadianViking on Aug 31, 2010 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions
You really want to waste a roster spot on Webb and Draft a QB high next year?
Why not just play Webb now at another position and draft your QBOF next year. Webb could still play the emergency QB if you wanted but the roster spot or draft choice wouldn’t be wasted.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions
Of all people you're asking this question.
You’ve made a ton of comments regarding the importance and difficulty of obtaining a QBOF over the last few months. Here’s my position on our QBs and the QBOF.
-I like TJ but next year is his last shot to prove himself so insurance is needed.
-Webb has tons of potential but is realistically 3 years away from starting.
-1st round pick. We have a deep team with the main questions being at QB and LT. Drafting a QB early just gives us another shot at finding the elusive franchise QBOF.
Basically TJ and Webb are both question marks when it comes to our QBOF position. Either could work out well or neither could, so a first round pick next year is hedging our bets. Basically I don’t see any problems with throwing three darts at the board in hopes of hitting a bullseye : )
by CanadianViking on Aug 31, 2010 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions
OK. But lets be clear.
I have said that If Webb is our QBOF we play him as a QB and nothing else. I believe that is how the FO thinks of him. Otherwise we would have instantly installed him as a WR when Rice went down.
But If I believe that , then I am not going to use my 1st rounder on a QB. That guy won’t be ready until 2102 either. Now if Webb ain’t the guy,then play him now, where we need him and use whatever we got to get a QBOF.
But there are teams like New England and Denver that like to stockpile QBs and use them as trade bait. Personally, I would rather have the best player available in the draft than have to pick a position.
I still see us keeping Sage for next year. T-Jack if an extension is negotiated soon and Webb being the QBOF. Sounds nuts when considering we didn’t draft him as a QB but proof is in the pudding. And the pudding looks good to me for what we have seen.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions
ALSO
Think about it from this perspective though, Childress thinks he is a QB guru. He thought he was going to be able to turn TJ into the next McNabb. Look how that project is coming along.
I think he figured out that he was wrong moving up in the 2nd to take TJ and say a guy with similar skills at a lower draft position and say more of an upside than a downside in taking the guy.
Who knows maybe he can mold him but I feel as if the pick was one from a developmental process and if it works great and if it doesnt they can chalk it up to a lower draft pick not working out.
If they have the ability to draft one of the top QB prospects in the draft I can’t seem them passing the chance up for a 2nd straight year.
I refuse to enter into that discussion as to what Childress believes he is or isn't.
QB guru is a phrase only Chilly haters use to downgrade the man.
The facts are these:
1) We moved all the way up in the draft to the last pick of the second round. Big deal. Its a cheap place to pick a QB. Its not a high priced thing and people blow the move way out of proportion.
2) It is just as possible that under any other Qb coach T-Jack would have been destroyed and never been the decent back-up Qb that he is.
3) Chilly knows talent. Thigpen and Booty were our picks but rightly so they were not as ready as T-Jack.
4) Chilly recognized T-Jacks weaknesses and went out and got Farve.
Complain all you want but I don’t see a bad QB coaching or drafting job by Chilly. They passed on Clausen and McCoy. Both highly rated. Why?
Because they did not evaluate them as franchise QBs. They could care less how well the prospects are rated by others.
Now they have discovered something special. If you trust these guys at all I would pay close attention to all of Webbs qualities.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions
I refuse to enter into that discussion as to what Childress believes he is or isn’t.
but you are willing to spout “qbof” in nearly every post, and assume that chilly thinks of any qb in those terms (i don’t see it that way).
thigpen and booty? come on, now. that’s not gonna work for your argument.
how many teams has thigpen been on now? booty and his knee braces were a wasted later round pick, he can barely hang on also.
chilly recognized his ‘mistake’ in moving up to specifically ‘target’ t-jack. then he threw him in early, then he yanked him out early for gus. then he sold him as the starter, all the while trying to land favre to save his reputation.
we wouldn’t be in this predicament if it wasn’t for his earlier qb selections.
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
I refer you to my reply below that outlines the 2006 draft.
Then tell me we made an error.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 11:30 AM CDT up reply actions
they made an error when they made him the stater so early.
he needed a lot of development. brad johnson didn’t work out, and they should have got a veteran to come in and take the starting role and keep t-jack as a back up to develop him more before tossing him in and expecting it to work.
then they didn’t handled his situation with inconsistency, so the expectations got a bit confusing. so, i think they are still working with the residual effects of those early decisions.
all said, i don’t think t-jack was a bad guy to pick, i just don’t like the handling of his development. and i think chilly is smart enough to learn from that and not do that again.
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
OK, I buy that. But an 8-4 starter ain't bad.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 12:26 PM CDT up reply actions
8-4 is not bad at all...
that adds to the situation. he is good enough to show that, but raw enough to need development, and they need a star qb now…it makes the situation harder to navigate through (if he sucked, he wouldn’t be here).
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
True, but my point was they developed him to be an 8-4 starter after just one year.
If he has improved then he should be great. I just haven’t seen it.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions
You don't have a very large sample size to go off of.
Maybe a total of 2 qtrs.?
A lot depends on how fast Webb develops.
Webb’s got a ton of talent but he’s going to take time and it’s a real possibility that he just never develops into a starting quality QB. I hope he does but I think it’s to early to commit our future to him alone. In kind of the same way you don’t want to trade Sage because TJ isn’t under contract for next year, I don’t want to rule out a 1st round QB pick because of the uncertainty of Webb’s learning curve. It’s nice to have a plan A, B, and C when talking about QBs.
by CanadianViking on Aug 31, 2010 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions
Agree
Which is why i don’t see them passing up an opportunity to grab a top QB prospect in the draft if they feel they can either get him flat out or trade up a few to get him.
I totally agree on one point
It is possible, yet difficult to believe, that when Rice went down Webb’s speed,size, and athleticism was not needed at the WR position. Under your theory they just want to try him out at QB and waste the pick if he doesn’t work out. I will grant you that if that was the decision process then they will give him this year to see how he develops. Then come February ( not April this year) they will draft a QB if they didn’t like his improvement during this season.
Again I find it a difficult decision to understand but it is possible.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions
webb was picked in a late round for his athleticism.
he is an unproven receiver, he has a lot more experience at qb. i don’t think the almighty FO drafted him to be the future of anything. i think they picked what you call ‘the BPA’. now they can see what they picked out of the bargain bin, and are looking for a way to try and develop/use it. he may be viewed as a future back-up qb (aka, ‘BUOF’) by the FO for all you know….it doesn’t make sense to label him as ‘qbof’ at this point, imo.
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
I'm only labeling him that because of the FO's actions.
Actions speak louder than words. Like I said. Maybe they will waste this pick and not put him on the field. But I think it says more about how they view him than anything else.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions
you like to label, i see it as "hey, let's see what we got"
and, the FO might see it a third way from you or me.
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
Well, What they got is
a very fast elusive man that they won’t put on the field because they think so highly of him.
God Bless them for understanding what they got.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Well, it's a Viking Tradition at this point... :)
There’s a number of very good vets who will be available next year, too. Maybe that’s what the FO is thinking…
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Billy Volek. He's our man. I'm sure SD will simply let him walk.
After all they have already trained the Crompton kid up to Phillip Rivers standards.
end/sarcasm
But I do like Volek. Something about screaming Go Billy at the TV.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions
Volek
What, will he be available next year, e.g. contract expiring? Are other teams allowed to talk to a player prior to his contract expiring?
To be honest, I haven’t seen the kid play. It’s hard enough for me to find time to watch the Vikings play, watching other games is very low on the priority list these days.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Yes
He is an 11 year vet. He has been with SD since he was drafted. He led them in the playoffs when Rivers was hurt.
He will be a free agent next year. No team can talk to a player’s agent without permission when they are under contract. That is an absolute rule that could cost you a draft choice if broken.
Remember GB’s claim that the Vikes had contacted Farve? Same rule.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions
Vets
Um, to be honest, when I was thinking experienced vet, I was thinking guys who were 1st string, not career backups :) . But I’ll accept your word on Volek being good, anything that improves the Mighty Purple gets my vote.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
The problem is we have been spoiled.
Farve isn’t just good. He’s great. Moon and Cunningham were good too. But man I really want our own young franchise guy.
Maybe its Webb. In the FO we trust.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions
EVEN IF...
It is Webb, we won’t see it till atleast 3 years from now. The guy def has the talent, but I hope we were all watching the same games he was making passes in because they were horribly inaccurate and often seemed as if he was on a totally different page than the rest of the off.
Save the one big running play, he didn’t stand out to me as a guy that was in any shape to be our QB either now or next year.
It will be AD and Gerhart just like it was before Favre
We don’t need a QB. We’ll run a double headed hydra on em and leave em eating dust!
Seriously though Sage isn’t a starter, TJ might be a starter (I will give him the chance) but in reality Childress will need to bire or draft a QB quickly.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
I say Bire one. I don't know what it is but do it.
Maybe its like the torpedo boat Captain. " Bire One, he yells at the torpedoman when the ship was in range"
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
Aye Aye Captain
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
MarkSP18 said:
It is a curious strategy that the front office is employing in regards to the QB position in 2011.
it’s seems to me that they are simply disregarding the qb position for 2011.
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
There is that bashing the FO again.
You know we have a good FO. They have never ignored the QB situation. You simply don’t agree with what they are doing.
For your info, so far they have retained a Franchise QB.
They are training a QB that they think is very special in Webb.
They have secured the services of Sage Rosenfels through the 2011 season.
What more did you want them to do?
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 11:02 AM CDT up reply actions
llv, that is not FO bashing. i just think they are willing to address it after this season ends.
you think very highly of the FO. i’m not as high on them as you are. that does not mean that i am bashing them. if you are so confident in them, then let them deal with this year first,
and next year will follow.
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
A good FO is always looking ahead. And I believe ours does.
To say otherwise ignores their draft and FA moves over the last three years.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions
i didn't say they were not looking ahead, but they passed on some options
and it is clear that they are going to have to address the issue at some point. the draft isn’t the only place you can find a qb. besides, they locked up sage rosenfels for 3 years
at $9 million, they said they targeted him for two years before they got him. doesn’t
that mean they are working on their future?
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
Exactly what I said.
They have a franchise guy in Farve.
They have Sage for next year.
They have Webb for the future.
How are they doing this?
it’s seems to me that they are simply disregarding the qb position for 2011.
If you meant they have already addressed it then I understand what your saying.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 12:31 PM CDT up reply actions
i should have maybe said...
“for right now…it’s seems to me that they are simply disregarding
the qb position for 2011.”
and i actually was being a little sarcastic about sage, sorry bout that.
but yes….i think we have reached a state of “same page”….yeeeah!!!
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
Bashing is almost as bad as Rabid Fandom
LLV did you notice that as soon as someone sad anything negative about the FO you jumped on him with both feet? Relax man, the FO does make mistakes and I think the QB position could really be one of them next year. I think you would have to be a blind man not to be worried about it.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
LL you know what time it is
You and I wanted them to take Clausen.
This conversation is about the future of TJack. He is not signed beyond 2010. Expecting him to just sign on the dotted line because it is the Vikings is shortsighted IMO.
So they went out and got Favre. Definite kudos to them for that. But we are talking beyond 2010.
Sage & Webb are not going to scare many teams.
And IF we are to believe the words out of the horse’s mouth (Chilly) then TJack is the number 2 QB.
So why is the #2 QB on the team not signed past 2010 and making less than the #3 QB (which could be for 2 years straight if they keep them both this year – which I think they will)? And you know that TJack’s agent is taking this all into account. I would.
That is a curious strategy TO ME. It is not saying they are effing up because they did get Favre. And they still may sign a free agent next year while Webb develops and let Sage back up that veteran (or start) so there is that possibility.
The QB position is still unsettled for 2011 besides Sage & Webb.
The reason why I say it is a curious strategy is because the guy they have as #2 is unsigned and there is this debate as to who they keep out of Sage & TJack.
I think they cut Lloyd and keep 4 QBs with Webb listed as a WR.
And it doesn’t matter who the QB is if they do not get a LTOTF!
That is more important than a QB IMHO!
I think we totally agree on the QB situation.
We both wanted Clausen after they disappointed you by not moving up to get Tebow. :)
I wanted Clausen but reserved them the right to evaluate him. They said they didn’t evaluate him or Tebow or McCoy as our guy. I don’t blame them for following their scouting. Heck, I would have taken Leinhart, and Quinn, and many other sure thing busts.
But it has been curious since the tender offers came out. I had one theory that they have their eye on a prized guy this year. Maybe Luck,Mallet, Pouncey,or Stanzi. Who knows.
I just think its easier to find a tackle than a QB. And a bad QB ain’t going anywhere with a great tackle.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions
I think you'll get a lot less busts out of a LT than you will out of QB.
So unlike a QB where you might have to go to the trough multiple times, you probably only need to hit the trough once for that LT. You might even get lucky and pull him out in the second.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Here we go again.
So, because it is difficult we should not draft a QB? Because often a team has to do it several times we should not draft a QB. Because all teams face the same problem at one time or another the Vikings should stick their heads in the sand and Not draft a QB.
There is always a left tackle in the draft. They are not all successful. There is Rarely a QB available that your team has evaluated as your QBOF. When you discover a rare Jewell, you pick it up. You don’t worry about how it will weigh you down on the trip home.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
Actually I was kind of agreeing with you.
So I was saying you can wait on the tackle a bit and pick up the QB if you spot him. McKinney may not be the best but he’s far from the worst. I would say you pick up the tackle when you think McKinney is in his last year.
Relax, Gruss Fraba…
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
TJack is the backup per profootballtalk and Sage is trade bait
TJack knows that if he is ever going to start it’s with the Vikes and Chilly as his coach, he’ll resign especially after Favre rides off into the sunset with his ring.
I don't buy that argument at all.
It is always easy to say what someone else will or won’t do. Its much more difficult for the front office to make decisions because they KNOW that they don’t control T-Jack or any other teams actions.
T-Jack has several good qualities. He throws the ball hard. NFL hard. He is quick afoot. NFL speed. These are the traits of a NFL QB that many teams do not have on their roster. These are the traits that keep winning him his back-up job.
Why does everyone use this childish “Chilly’s baby” angle. Look at his abilities and his faults.
T-Jack could easily win a back-up role on several teams. He gets paid like a back-up now and could easily have taken offense at the way he has been valued ( pay wise) by the Vikings.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 6:06 AM CDT up reply actions
T-Jack's longeviety
Why does everyone use this childish "Chilly’s baby" angle. Look at his abilities and his faults.
Because Chilly bet the farm on T-Jack and he’s come up short, yet he hasn’t thrown down big on a guy like Clausen or McCoy or SKELTON, only grabbing Webb as a longshot WR who, after the fact, serendipitously turns out to be able to hurl the pigskin fairly well. I know T-Jack has skills and talent, but I’d hate to have to depend on him for a full season; I don’t think he’d make it.
I think Webb counts as a ‘bigger son’ to replace T-Jack :).
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Bad facts
Betting the farm is when you give up draft choices and players for a QB like the Cutler trade.
It is when you pay 34 Million for a high round bust QB like JaMarcus. It is not moving up for the last pick of the second round.
So far Cluasen, McCoy, and Skelton have not outperformed anyone and obviously were not evaluated to do so by our FO. Why blame them for acting on their own successful scouting program.
You are simply placing your unfounded beliefs above the professionals the Vikes have in place to do this job. If every coach is held to the standard of not having a late second round QB turn out well then few coaches will pass muster.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions
Nice points. There aren’t actually many QBs drafted into the league during Chilly’s tenure/2006 that (at this point) seem all that covetable. Matt Ryan’s probably been the best followed by Flacco and Cutler. And the Vikings weren’t in position to draft any of those three (Flacco was drafted #18 in 2008, but the Vikings traded their #17 overall pick prior to the draft for Jared Allen, and Flacco was an unlikely target, anyway, as he’s not a WCO style QB).
Moreover, the only QBs who have started (so far) that the Vikings passed on are Chad Henne, Kevin Kolb, Kellen Clemons, and Brady Quinn. Kolb’s looked decent in limited time and may look good for a whole season running an Andy Reid offense with several talented playmakers, but we’ll see.
Granted, looking at things this way is limited in that context plays so heavily in how NFL players develop. And obviously these are all younger guys, particularly last year’s class (although both Stafford and Sanchez were pretty awful even by rookie standards; I think if forced to choose I’d take Josh Freeman from last year’s class right now), so jury’s still out.
But still, I agree the perception that Chilly somehow overpaid for TJack isn’t accurate. If anything, in my opinion he takes too much heat for that draft move and not enough for basically trusting an obviously-not-ready TJack way too much and not seriously finding him a legit mentor (much less competition for starter) until his 4th year in the league.
Henne is looking good though
Hindsight is always 20/20, but Henne looks to be the guy down there in Miami.
You also forgot Brian Brohm who has technically started a game or two in Buffalo….but we all know that wasn’t a bad decision to pass on him.
by PackApologist on Aug 31, 2010 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions
That comes with the territory of playing a young QB, though. I also think Chilly’s relaxed the ole’ sphincter a little bit and isn’t quite the know-it-all he was earlier. He still has that trait to him, but I think he appreciates better than he used to that no matter how good he thinks his plan is, he still needs players to make things happen once in a while.
I think if he really didn’t trust him, he would’ve had a little more urgency than signing the Gus Frerotte’s of the world. I think he doesn’t trust TJack now, though.
I can't blame them for Kolb.
Philadelphia moved ahead of us in the second round to get Kolb in the 2nd round of 2007. then we moved down to get Sidney Rice with that pick. We passed on Drew Stanton and Chip Beck. Why wouldn’t we. Our new Qb T-Jack was ready to go 8-4 in his second year.
In 2008 We didn’t need a QB. T-Jack had just gone 8-4. we didn’t have a first round pick having used it for Jared Allen. We needed secondary help, not a QB.
It wasn’t until after the 2008 year that T-Jack looked so unpromising. After that we got Farve.
Not bad.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions
I agree
To be clear, I’m not blaming them for anything; just mainly pointing out that there hasn’t exactly been a bumper crop of QB prospects to choose from since Chilly took the reins.
And for Kolb in particular, I like him, but Vikings fans (or fans of any other team in need of a QB) won’t have a legitimate complaint if he’s good, at least one that’s not based entirely on hindsight and conjecture their team could’ve developed him similarly. First, anytime a QB slips into round 2 and beyond, it’s crapshoot time (as if it that weren’t the case already, but you get my point). Second, Kolb’s fallen into a situation where he’s been able to develop, Aaron Rodgers style, for a long time behind the scenes for an organization that knows the passing game and had a franchise QB. Whatever he is/becomes, he’s the result of a pure development situation; going relatively late (for a QB) in the draft means he shouldn’t be viewed as a draft mistake for teams that didn’t take him.
But again, my point is fans are too hard on Chilly for the TJack draft. My point is it isn’t like he’s got an Alex Smith type mistake on his docket, and it isn’t like he’s missed an opportunity to draft someone spectacular, either. I think TJack’s been a decent pick considering all this; my only complaint is Chilly was a little too eager to, in essence, treat him as THE QB early on.
Here is why I disagree with your statement
I’m with you to the end. But T-Jack started his second year. He went 8-4.
If any other Qb had done that you would be jumping iup and down saying Great Job coach. We have a winner here. Next year this guy should be the next Joe Montana.
It is the 2008 year that people get pissed about. The coach destroyed a player by pulling him because he wasn;‘t performing. That is strictly hindsight and still not proven to be true. Same coach rewards the player later by giving him his shot at leading the team to the playoffs. He does so. Player never gets better. Coach reacts the same way. Benches him in 2009 for a Franchise QB.
Call it bad management if you will but I think T-Jack has had opportunity to learn and perform. He knows whats expected and the result if he can’t perform. Pretty much the same as any good management team would do with their employees.
Is everyone making the same criticism of the coaches in Arizona for giving Lienart competition. Or the coaches in San Fran for asking Smith to take a pay cut. Its the way the NFL works. Perform or die. T-Jack performed early. He flunked later. I don’t get the bad management part.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions
I think Chili pulled the plug on TJ too early in 08.
If not for a few dropped passes we would’ve had a good chance of winning those games or at least the one vs. Indy.
I also think we could've made the playoffs w/ TJ starting all of 08
and that the experienced gained from playing all of the regular season games would have been very beneficial for TJ come playoff time. I’m not saying we would’ve beat Philly (they seemed to have a very good gameplan that we didn’t adjust to), but I think TJ would have had a better game than he did.
But that is just supposition on your part.
It is a pipedream. The coach KNEW we were going to lose with T-Jack. So he put in Gus. That is life in the NFL. You perform each and every week. You get better, not worse. Why? Because some old fart will outperform you. You are blaming a successful coach for being successful. You wish ,hope,or think TJ might have performed better. You don’t KNOW. But I bet the coaches who saw him every single day knew what was what..
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions
How could they know we'd win with Gus throwing all those INT's?
They couldn’t and they didn’t. They just got lucky.
Well. It made sense to me....kinda. lol
I’m in a hurry to get out of work and not quite sure what I was trying to get at. Have a good night!
I get what you’re saying, but I’m not sure I’d go that far. That was 2007, the year of AP and the AP-ettes. Jackson was well below average in every passer category save sack rate. He was young, starting for the first time, and the expectations were modest, and he had poor weapons to throw to (that may have been the year of the coup de grace of Troy Williamson’s tenure, aka the game at Denver, lowlights available on YouTube), but I don’t think many had great expectations for TJack after that season. Although you may be right that the tide turned in general in 2008. I can’t recall.
Pretty sure that was 08, but you're right about TJ not carrying the team to the playoffs.
Gus didn’t do it either though.
Betting the Farm
LLV, betting the farm is also when you fail to bring in a high-end replacement for the guy you grabbed first, year after year.
Chilly bet the future of the Viking franchise on Tarvaris Jackson. He’s maintained this belief in T-Jack because he hasn’t brought in a hot young gunslinger to replace T-Jack, despite T-Jack’s limited success.
No, Thigpen and Booty don’t count, neither of them were top prospects and neither of them showed much of anything when the Vikings had them,either. Webb doesn’t count because he was brought in to be a WR and it was pure luck that he happened to be tossing the ball that morning and Chilly liked what he saw.
That’s not unfounded, my friend. Thems thars da facts.
Even if the Vikings like Luck or Mallet or someone else in next year’s draft, they’d be betting that whoever it is, that guy can step in and take the #1 slot from Day 1. That means a Stafford or a Bradford level draft pick, and THAT’S a heck of a gamble because the tank is empty behind him if it doesn’t work.
What if McNabb wants to stay with the Redskins? What if no seasoned vet comes available to the Vikes next year and Chilly is left to twist in the wind? The farm, baby, is going to dry up and blow away in the wind.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
DC. I respect your thoughts on the vikings
Your statements are well thought out in almost every instance.
But on this one you are not making a very convincing case.
Did the packers bet the farm and set the franchise back when they drafted Brian Brohm in the second round? The Dolphins with three straight years of selecting 2nd round QBs? No. They did draft a project in Thigpen in 2007. A good selection at a time when T-Jack appeared ahead of schedule coming off of an 8-4 season.
They did draft a project in the 5th round 2008 with Booty right after T-Jack had a bad season. We had no #1 pick that year because they wanted Jared Allen. What would you have them do? Tell me the answer even in hindsight? Brian Brohm or Chad Henne were available. Is that the kind of stud young franchise player you are thinking about?
Realizing that T-Jack had not improved the staff went out and got a Franchise QB.
We have not mortgaged the farm yet. But when the prized stud bull is available I bet we we make a bid.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
I think you're arguing draft positions
while DC is arguing coaching decisions. Is TJ a bust draft wise? Not really he was a second round pick and he’s still playing. I wouldn’t say it was a stellar pick but it’s not a bad one. No DC is stating the farm is in trouble because Childress won’t see that he needs some SERIOUS back up for TJ. Not some wanna be QB’s from a crap division or a 6th round reciever project. He’s talking a bonafied going to start in the NFL type guy. Next year could be a very bad year for the Vikes.and if it is, I expect many more bad years until we rectify our problem at QB.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Yes- We all agree on the fact that we need a QBOF. A young one if possible
But how do you do that? If the need arose in the 2008 draft ( and it did) and we had no 1st rounder ( and we didn’t) how is Chilly suppose to fix it?
A team can’t manufacture a QB exactly when they need it. A team buys time and when they find their guy they go after him. With picks and money and everything most fans hate to give up.
Or you simply get lucky. Hmmm, maybe, No it couldn’t be true.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
Personally I'm going with AZF
Unicorns, glitter, hearts and happy faces!
Sort of like my lunch box.
I do know what you mean LLV. Your stating that the planets have no aligned yet for the Minnesota QB to be brought forth into the NFL. I understand that however, sometimes as my dear old one legged Grandpa said, ‘You just have to make your own luck’
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Make your own luck.
Can’t disagree with that. Isn’t getting Farve twice making your own luck until the planets align? Maybe I’m missing something. Tell me exactly who the Vikings should have gotten? And yes I realize that Brees was available when we fired Culpepper. Ouch that one hurt real bad.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
Ships passing in the night
I think we’re talking different chains of thought, LLV. I’m not trying to say that some specific guy was ‘The One’ and the FO passed on him. While I have my druthers and suspicions, I don’t claim to have better scouting reports and a better eye for the right fit, than Speilmann & Co (and I believe the right ‘fit’ is critical, you need more than an arm and a brain, you need a guy who’s natural style fits your offense or he’s going to be fighting against himself on every play). I’m saying that they didn’t even try. At one one of those guys had to be a decent prospect, but they chose to build the rest of the team instead. I think the QB position is hands-down the hardest position to get a quality, dare I say, franchise-quality guy in, but it’s also the most critical. To some extent, you have to take a chance or you’re not going to have much of anything. The FO has pretty much passed on it. How many top-rated QBs do you go through til you find The One? History suggests that a team will go through 2 of them on the road to finding The One. How many guys from the middle of the deck do you go through before you find The One? I have no idea, but I bet it’s a hell of a lot more than 1 or 2.
Maybe I should try a different analogy :) . The Vikings put all their QBOTF eggs in one basket, T-Jack, and the best new egg they’ve gotten since is Webb and he was a fluke. They really haven’t pulled any eggs from the Grade A shelf, they’ve been hitting up the Grade D shelf hoping that someone left a Grade A egg in the carton by accident.
If we get the Lombardi, I think we’ll all agree it was worth it, even if we go 0-16 next year (and thereby get a top draft slot!). And that appears, to me, to be the FO’s focus; go for all the marbles NOW. For what it’s worth, I also think it’s the right decision. They don’t have time to woo and mortgage and groom a QBOTF, I think they’re just as worried as we are that they might get moved out of Minny without a stadium, and the best argument for a new stadium and a commitment to stay is, 1) the Lombardi, and 2) lots of star-power in the ranks (e.g. Favre).
I hope I explained what I’m trying to say a bit more clearly.
I’m NOT going for the notion that there was no one else the Vikings could have gotten, that they did the best they could. Rather, I think it’s been a deliberate strategy, a choice, for a specific reason, and no apologies are necessary. These guys aren’t stupid, they aren’t being paid the big bucks to throw darts at the wall when it comes time to make a decision.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Slow down . TJ was nearly a third rd pick . Cutler was giving the farm .
serendipshittedly as played out by ESPN . Remember your sources when having opinions about the front office . I don’t remember Webb grabbing a WR number when he supposidly was starting ot as a WR . The FO pulls on your strings as much as the Media . All I can say is …."SUCKERS !!!!! " .
by gothicpurple on Aug 31, 2010 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions
Locker will be gone . Luck , Mallet , Ponder the list goes on . I predicted that we would pass on a QB in 2010 unless for Gods sake damn Tebow slipped thru .
I see 5-6 solid QB prospects in 2011 . It will be a good time to strike in the top Three rds. .
by gothicpurple on Aug 31, 2010 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions
It’ll be interesting to see how the lockout threat and/or the potential of a rookie payscale (depressing the financial motive for jumping early a bit) affects underclassmen. Guys like Luck and Mallet may just decide it’s not worth it. Locker and Ponder are seniors and potential must-see-TV for Vikings fans with an eye towards the future, but after that, who knows?
I’ve seen Ponder projected anywhere from top 10-ish to the second round. Who knows? He doesn’t have mouth-watering tools/natural ability, but I’m not sure he’s your typical good-stats/unremarkable potential prospect (e.g., guys like Brohm, Claussen, or McCoy). He doesn’t run a quirky system like McCoy and he isn’t being maxed out by a noted QB whisperer like Claussen and Brohm. He also faced several elite college defenses last year and was still productive.
I think the thing I like most about him is his poise in the pocket; he has that instinct for the rush(TJack’s biggest weakness, IMO). I’m not sure if he’s quite enough of an athlete to satisfy Chilly’s sweettooth, but he’s mobile enough (and he features a great sack rate), so maybe he can walk that grey area between the Spielman camp (which favors more conventional pocket passers) and the Childress camp (on the lookout for the next McNabb).
Have you ever seen Matt Leinart's college stats.
The most perfect fit for an NFL QB since Manning. A can’t miss college QB. Tall, strong, accurate. I’m not sure how the scouts ever make a proper decision if these kind of stats don’t tell us the answer.
My point is that 6 college QBs will look good. Only a few will survive.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 1:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Sure. Nobody knows.
Although I will say Ponder has faced better competition with a less talented supporting cast than Leinart did. And while Leinart’s an immature flake (and still seems to be) who thinks he’s entitled to anything he wants, Ponder’s in a master’s degree program and prefers to do things like play the piano instead of having his picture taken at parties with several girls of questionable age. ;)
But seriously, nobody knows where these guys will be considered next April (remember when UDFA Jevan Snead was going to go #1 overall?), much less what sort of pros they’ll become. Even beyond potential, Ponder might get hurt again, or regress, as prior to last year’s excellent campaign he was a non-prospect. I don’t really envy scouts/decision-makers on this stuff, particularly QBs.
+1
But lets not forget that Leinart won the Heisman. USC faced all comers. He was the real deal and got 18 mil to prove it. Still hasn’t proven it.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions
Joey Harrington liked to play piano too: )
by CanadianViking on Aug 31, 2010 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Is he still available. Maybe install a piano bar in the clubhouse.
Brett can sit at the Piano with his martini and sing some Dean Martin songs.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 3:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Things could be worse...
We could have Leinart on our squad!
Jackson, in comparison, has handled the Favre situation with class (at least it appears so).
Leinart gets his ego ‘bruised’ if the avacados at the salad bar are more than 3 days old.
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Aug 31, 2010 10:35 AM CDT reply actions
lol
Agreed. Atleast TJ just keeps his mouth shut and gets on with his job. I have no faults with TJ personally, I just don’t think he is that good. I would love him to prove me wrong any day though.
We picked Chad Greenway with the 17th selection in 2006.
We Should have moved up to #3 and taken Vince Young for a 25 Million guarantee
We should have moved up to #11 and taken Cutler for 16 Mil guaranteed.
We should have moved up to #10 and taken Lienhart at 18 Mil guaranteed
We took Cedrick Griffen at #48
We should have taken Kellen Clemons who went at #49
Instead we take Jackson at #64 for a 1 Mil signing bonus and $750,000 per year.
By the way. Who made the best choice in that group? I will remind everyone that in 2008 T-Jack compiled an 8-4 record.
Sorry to be so touchy about this but the facts show that T-Jack was a pretty good catch from 2006.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 11:27 AM CDT up reply actions
so does this mean that t-jack is your pick for QBOF? if so, then what's all the fuss?
Instead we take Jackson at #64 for a 1 Mil signing bonus and $750,000 per year.
By the way. Who made the best choice in that group? I will remind everyone that
in 2008 T-Jack compiled an 8-4 record.
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
No. I am sure when they picked him they thought he would be the future.
And as Medicineball has said TJack could just be coming into his own. But I don’t buy it.
He is a good back-up but I see nothing better. I say that from what I have seen this year. No better than last year IMHO. I think the FO believes that also. That is why they gave him a 2nd round tender. I think they know they need a franchise QB ( Farve proved it) and I think there is a strong chance that one accidentally fell in their laps.
We don’t need a QB this year. We need a fast athletic receiver this year. There is a major reason that Webb isn’t on the field. And it is not because he is only as good as Thigpen or Booty. They know what they want. They know what they have previously drafted. They know what it takes to train a guy like T-Jack.
after knowing all of that they choose to make Webb a QB.
I only have one explanation. Webb is extremely special and we are very lucky.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions
i agree...there are more pressing immediate concerns that take priority for 2010.
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
Yeah, like keeping Marksp from trading away all of my D-Line :)
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Maybe Webb just isn't that good of a receiver.
Don’t mean to rain on your optimism about his prospects at QB, because I share them, but it’s possible that he didn’t look good as a WR in mini-camp.
by CanadianViking on Aug 31, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions
True, but with reporters watching TC every day I think we would have heard that, don't you?
I’m just looking at the facts. Someone bought a lucky lottery ticket. Now don’t lose it before we cash it in.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions
The facts are that nobody has said Webb looked good at receiver in mini-camp.
And Webb didn’t take reps at WR in training camp so the idea that he’d be a good/great WR is one based only on his fantastic measurables and fan opinion. I’m just trying to temper your expectations for the guy as it’s very early to predict he’s going to be good at either position and right now the only facts we know about Webb are that he’s very fast and can throw a ball very far : )
by CanadianViking on Aug 31, 2010 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions
Well, I know something else.
I know he is the only D-1 Qb to EVER run for 1,000 yards and throw for 2,000 yards two years in a row. This guy is an athlete and every team would have him out practicing and discovering his skills unless they saw huge QB potential in him. I’m not basing my thoughts on what we didn’t see in TC.
I’m basing my thoughts on the actions, not words, of the coaches and front office. A Mind is a beautiful thing to waste. So is NFL talent. The Vikes aren’t known for wasting talent.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 1:14 PM CDT up reply actions
True, but with reporters watching TC every day I think we would have heard that, don’t you?
I’m just looking at the facts.
I’m not disputing that he’s a great athlete or that he’s got a lot of potential at QB. I just disagreed with what you thought were facts. You’ve concluded that because he’s a great athlete and we didn’t look at him at WR since the first mini-camp that he’s our QBOF.
I hope he is our QBOF but it’s very possible that he’s just a good athlete and his best position is QB and not WR. Your conclusions are logical but lets not label Webb as the future just yet. He may work out to be special but we’re not going to find that out for 2-3 years. For now he’s a raw athletic talent and we have no idea what he’ll become be it good, bad, or average.
by CanadianViking on Aug 31, 2010 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions
You are correct.
I did not say Webb is a franchise QB. My only argument all along is that the FO has seen something special enough that they are treating him as a QBOF. Not as some late draft pick. My expectations are that if he improves ( film study, offensive scheme grasp) this year they won’t be using a high draft pick on a QB.
But the draft is a long way off and we might not even have football next year. I simply keep reminding everyone why we can’t trade Sage and can’t get rid of Webb.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 2:00 PM CDT up reply actions
Cool.
I didn’t mean to imply that Webb can’t be great or that we should not have him on our 53 man roster either. In fact if we don’t carry four QBs I’d much rather lose Sage than Webb.
by CanadianViking on Aug 31, 2010 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Sigh-------
And have no QB in 2011?
I hate taking that risk. I guess if we can’t have 4 I would trade T-Jack since his contract is up and we need a QB in 2011.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions
As, I've said before.
A Sage trade would have to involve a TJ extension at roughly the same time. I know it’s not a given TJ would sign an extension but considering his ambition to be a starter it seems likely he’d take a deal if he knows Sage is on his way out.
by CanadianViking on Aug 31, 2010 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions
OK. Give me an extension first , then sure.
But give me all four id you can. With Cook out it is getting less likely
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions
I wonder how he would have done without the line and the play of a certain running back
If you put him in the same position V Young was in? Or Lieneheart? I think he would be out of the league.
Albiet we did save some cabbage.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
He wasn't drafted as a QB without a good RB or Line play.
He was drafted to fit our team. Our system. And at the same time he saved some cabbage. He wasn’t drafted to fit those other teams needs. One goes with the other.
To me its incredible that he has outplayed Lienart as a pro QB but everyone wants to Blame Childress and the Vikes for this Very Late second round selection.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
Believe it or not,
but TJ has a better completion %, career passer rating, and TD/INT ratio than both Young and Leinart. 2006 was not a stellar year for QBs as Cutler has been the best of the bunch with his career 83 passer rating and losing record. After him Jackson is surprisingly the best statistically although Young has a much more impressive W/L record. It’s even possible that Leinart might be out of the league before Jackson: )
by CanadianViking on Sep 1, 2010 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Ah but if you had but leinheart or Young in as a Vikings QB
Do you think they would have done better? I"m more leaning toward Young as a quicker QB. If you’re going to be a running team you need a quicker QB as the bigguns that move that line aren’t to quick and your QB is going to have to avoid the rush on his own at times.
Point is I think some QB’s are killed by their situation. The top prospecs get tossed to the wolves and either sink or swim.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
I can agree with that.
I’d take Young over TJ because despite his ugly stats he just manages to win. Still don’t like Leinart.
by CanadianViking on Sep 3, 2010 11:25 AM CDT up reply actions
I’m not sure how much we should count Webb into the longterm plans. I think they’ll keep him. But we’re talking about a smaller school late round pick who’s an athlete-first type QB with very little experience running anything resembling a pro offense. And so far this preseason, that’s what he looks like. Realistically/historically, the ceiling on this type of prospect is Seneca Wallace, a depth guy who can start in an emergency now and then and maybe give you some options with specialty packages. That’s not horrible by any means for a 6th round pick, but I’m not sure he’s all that relevant in QBOTF or QBOTP discussions.
I’d agree they should consider addressing the position seriously (e.g., round 1 or 2) before too long.
Of course, they’re going to have several other areas of concern popping up over the next couple years as well. Outside of offensive skill positions (and who even knows there with Rice and Harvin) and possibly DE, they have either age or performance concerns all over the field that will need need to be addressed sooner or later, as well. I’m sure I’ll be looking up plenty of FSU games this year to watch Christian Ponder closely, but if a young QB in purple is destined to spend his NFL formative years facing constant collapsing pockets (and confidence), they can’t do it.
Hmm, something ate a portion of my post (anybody else having trouble with this site lately?).
Anyway, I compared Webb’s upside more to Seneca Wallace than future starter (starter by design, at least).
In 2011 . D. McNabb , Early rd QB , Webb
Sage & TJ are what we need to get to the Ring this year . Next year is a new look team . Unless that damn Silverfox has his heart set on crushing the hearts of Packer Fans one last time . Hell I’ll pay to see that too !!!! In Lamo if he is here in 2011 .
by gothicpurple on Aug 31, 2010 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions
We can't play the McNabb game for a year. Lets not plan on something that isn't available, yet.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Your agreeable today. And I agree with you.
McNabb is somewhat injury prone. If we go after him its not like having iornman Farve as your leader.
I want our own young franchise guy.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 2:03 PM CDT up reply actions
Me too
All my life it seems the Vikings have used veterans near the end of their careers to QB: Jim McMahon, Cunningham, Moon, Favre… And the rare occasions where they’ve had “their” own guy (maybe Kramer, whom I barely remember, or Daunte), they’ve had enough inconsistencies where you can’t fully trust them.
Unfortunately, there aren’t enough young franchise guys to go around.
They are available but you have to pay.
As soon as you start talking about two 1st round draft picks and a couple of players plus 50 Mil fans start looking in the bargain bin.
Then they get pissed because you found a pretty good Qb with the last pick in the 2nd round. Or if you do find a bargain in the 6th they want to throw the guy to the ST wolves.
Its a no win situation. If Clausen turns out to be a great QB then Spielman will look like an idiot. Yet he didn’t reach and he made a fine selection.
No win situation.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions
WADE WILSON!
Gannon! God those were some ugly years…
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Brad Johnson the second time around
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
My man drinking Tommy Kramer
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
Bill Cappleman- 2nd round draft pick 1970
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
hey, don't forget the most legendary...

in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.
I think I have that card :)
Lee gave a lot of bang for the buck, holding down both positions and giving the Vikings the option of being able to pull a sneaky pass in the occasional hour of need!
The Cowboys copied us with Danny White, but it really wasn’t a bad idea.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
There was no point in reading this post
because you said trade Joe Webb and keep, Sage? You could go down in entire line of “WHAT IFS” what if Sidney get hurt? Well we handled that fine, what if Pat Or Jared goes down, we’ll be just fine, What if AP gets hurt? We’ll have Toby. Don’t you see, we know exactly what we have in Sage, and the guy can’t even move up the depth chart after out-performing T-jack in preseason, in there has to be a reason. So my question is, why trade or even release Joe Webb, when one of the 2qbs in the for seen future is leaving anyways? And oh yea, next year lets grab Ryan Mallet
Can you get ❼ Lebron? Can you get 1 Vikings? 2010 is the year to do it!!
by UnBannedVikingholic on Aug 31, 2010 2:17 PM CDT reply actions
Why keep Webb if your going to spend several high picks on Mallet?
I think Mediceball was saying win now with who you got and get someone else later if need be.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
by lifelongvike on Aug 31, 2010 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions
If you think Jackson stinks, then you probably figure Rosenfels is terrible.
But Childress is impressed by Jackson’s development. He has seen Jackson’s evolution in training camp this year, and Sage’s. He is impressed by both.
Webb is great in potential, but in the 2010 season he will ride the pine the entire season. If he is ever in position where he would be called on to play in a situation that mattered, the Vikings would bend over backwards to sign Gus Frerrotte, Brooks Bollinger, or some veteran. And we need that roster space for a contributor in the present.
by medicineball on Aug 31, 2010 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions
I just read all 136 comments and
what I didn’t see was anybody mentioning the ESPN press conference that Favre gave after the Vikings – 49ers game. Did any of you guys see it? Was Brett just caught up in the moment, or just flappin’ his jaw, when he said, “we need to find a way to get the ball into Joe Webb’s hands this season”. I don’t know if that means being a WR or what, but I’d like to see it happen.
Maybe the F.O. has a few surprises in store for us.
I heard of a team that moved a player to a coaching position
Not sure how they accomplished that or even which team it was but that would be cool way to keep Webb and Sage
"If you've got them by the balls their hearts and minds will follow."
John Wayne
by just another viking on Aug 31, 2010 9:23 PM CDT reply actions
Interesting
That would require the player to retire ( takes league permission) and cancel his current contract. Then the player would need to sign a coaches contract. He couldn’t practice with the team except as a coach. It sounds like a way to train a coach but I’m not so sure about using that to stash a young player.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp
playing time this preseason: Jackson and Rosenfels
There is an interesting point made over at ESPN. Jackson got his practice in camp with the first team. Rosenfels practiced with the second team. When Favre arrived before preseason game 2, Jackson suddenly didn’t have a group he had practiced a lot with. That is probably why he hasn’t seen a lot of playing time in the preseason games.
For once I agree with ESPN. Thanks for the link.
"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by 


















