Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton's Unique Public Statement On His Addiction

If Your Last Name Begins With an R, You've Been Traded To The Giants

The Minnesota Vikings began to trim their roster down to the mandatory 53 lottery tickets by trading two guys that had done everything possible to make the final cut.  Earlier this evening, QB Sage Rosenfels an RB Darius Reynaud were traded to the New York Giants for conditional draft picks.  'Conditional' means that if Reynaud and Rosenfels either suck or don't play it will be a seventh round pick, but if they play a lot and/or tear it up it will be a high draft pick.  Considering Eli Manning and Ahmad Bradshaw are ahead of Rosie and Reynaud, I'll go with the former, and if you ask me, the Vikings traded the wrong guys.

My Captain Morgan induced reasoning after the jump.

Star-divide

If I ever get to meet Sage Rosenfels, I'm going to shake his hand and offer to buy him a beer.  I can't think of a more difficult position a quarterback has been put in over the last 10-15 years in the NFL than Rosenfels was put in here in Minnesota.  He came to the Vikings with a big raise and the promise that he would get a fair chance to compete for the starting job.  At the time, that was true.  The Favre rumors were distant rumblings, much like a thunderstorm that you saw way in the horizon, one that could go right over you or pass 20 miles to the north.  

Well, Hurricane Favre rolled through Minneapolis, and the quarterback situation changed immediately.  Before Favre signed, Jackson had been given the nod over Rosenfels, but that went by the wayside as soon as the Gunslinger donned the purple.  All of last year, Jackson was the #2 quarterback, and Rosenfels was the highest paid clipboard carrier in America.  Nice work if you can get it, but it wasn't what Rosenfels was looking for.  But he said all the right things and waited for another opportunity this year.

Rosenfels did nothing to play his way out of Minnesota, but the NFL is a cold business.  As the 2010 pre-season unfolded, it became apparent that Tarvaris Jackson was going to be the #2 quarterback if Brett Favre returned, and after the draft, Joe Webb's athleticism couldn't be ignored.  So it became an unwinnable battle for Rosenfels, yet like the true professional he is, he fought on.

And in that fight, he out-performed Jackson.  Rosenfels got the most playing time, put up better numbers, and generally passed the eye test over Jackson.  You can make a solid argument that the veteran experience of Rosenfels outweighs the athletic ability of Jackson.  You could really persuade someone when you factor in the athletic ability of rookie Joe Webb, who looked better than both Rosenfels and Jackson at times during the pre-season.  But Tarvaris Jackson is no rookie.  He is entering his fifth season, and he knows the offense.  With the offensive line in flux, his athleticism can't be overlooked in case, you know, the Apocalypse hits.  And by Apocalypse I mean Favre getting hurt. 

So Jackson it is, and we wish Sage and his family well in the Big Apple Big Toxic Waste Dump that is New Jersey.

RB Darius Reynaud is in a similar situation.  Although I can say I'm not surprised Rosenfels got traded, I am surprised that Reynaud was shipped off.  Reynaud always had an uphill battle to make the final 53, and I always thought he was kind of a long shot.  But switching from WR to RB was his best chance, and in his defense, he made the most of that opportunity.  The Vikings offensive line has been...uh...unsettled so far, and Reynaud looked better than any other of the backup running backs so far in training camp.  Like Rosenfels, his performance had to be taken in context with the level of competiton he was going up against, but also like Rosenfels, he passed the eye' test.

What really surprises me about moving Reynaud is I thought his punt return ability  combined with his performance in the backfield almost assured him a spot on the roster.  I really thought he could be a primary backup to Percy Harvin, as he was able to play either WR or carry the ball, like Harvin, and could be either the punt returner or kick returner.  If, you know, the mini-Apocalypse hit.  And by mini-Apocalypse I mean Harvin missing significant time because of his migraines.

Yes, I've been backing reynaud on this site since the VIkings announced the position switch, but I honestly thought Reynaud had played well enough to earn a roster spot.  However, I don't make those choices, and we should all be thankful.  I know a lot of Chilly/TJ bashers will be angry with this move, and I understand that. 

But we can do nothing about it other than move on.  So move on we will, to New Orleans and the season opener next week.

Without Sage Rosenfels and Darius Reynaud.

Comment 150 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Who do you guys figure will be your kick and punt returner then? Harvin? Hasn’t Reynaud been your punt returner the last couple seasons, or am I imagining things?

by packallday555 on Sep 3, 2010 11:31 PM CDT reply actions  

Kick Returner Harvin

Punt Returner…looks like Asher Allen.

by TonyO on Sep 3, 2010 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

KR Harvin, which is no change from last year

As you should remember PAD. :) Punt returner is very murky, which really makes this move unsettling for me. Had someone jumped out and looked the part, I’d be okay with this move, but Reynaud made plays on ST.

And if it is Allen, like TonyO says, that really runs a risk with the CB position if he gets hurt on ST. Right now, the Vikes only have three healthy CB’s on the roster, assuming Sherels gets cut, which he probably will.

Just and odd move.

"Whoever said that the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons."

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota

by Ted Glover on Sep 3, 2010 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

very odd...

which makes me think that something else is at play…

I BELIEVE...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 3, 2010 11:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I meant to comment on the photo caption.

funnier than hell! thanks for the laugh!!

I BELIEVE...

by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 3, 2010 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe

But I think it’s going to be a waiver wire dumpster dive.

"Whoever said that the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons."

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota

by Ted Glover on Sep 3, 2010 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, unfortunately I do remember :(.

Yeah, I mean it leaves a question mark at punt returner but on top of that Reynaud was very, very good there (at least to me). He’s so damn shifty haha. He always seems to make at least one or two guys miss.

by packallday555 on Sep 4, 2010 12:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah I don't understand the Reynaud move

He’s put points on the board for us in a fairly consistant fashion. Oh well not like he traded AP I guess. I really would like to see an offensive line pick up in the near future.

It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...

by Grime on Sep 4, 2010 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Love the caption, too true.

Let me ask you (everyone) this: Ignoring draft position, which player would you rather have, Darius or Toby? From what I have seen this preseason Toby runs for 0-5 yards and Darius is like an AP-lite. Add to that the recieving ability (as a back and reciever) and the return ability and it seems to me Darius should be our #3 RB.

by Codypc21 on Sep 4, 2010 12:09 AM CDT reply actions  

I don’t get this statement! From what I’ve seen of Young I’ve been pretty impressed. He’s obviously no AP but he is reliable and consistent. He usually makes the correct cut up field (which is valuable in your running scheme), he’s a reliable target as a receiver, and is a reliable blocker. He doesn’t necessarily do anything great but do you really need him too?

I was impressed with Reynaud though too. If he can improve his blocking he could become a good little 3rd down Rb. You can’t teach agility/quicks. He’s great when he gets into open space.

Keeping Toby is obvious but too me he looked like the least impressive of the bunch. He runs to straight up and down, and didn’t always seem to make the right cuts up field. Granted he is a rookie, and probably does still need time to adjust and learn your running scheme.

by packallday555 on Sep 4, 2010 1:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

You put to words exactly how I feel.

Just curious, where do you spend more time: here or APC? I like your objectivity but you sure seem to be on a rival’s site a lot (not that there is anything wrong with that).

by Codypc21 on Sep 4, 2010 1:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

I’m on both pretty frequently haha. I think I’ve got close to 1,000 more posts over on APC, so to answer your question I’m over there more. I just used to live in MN (just moved this year) and because of that, and my love for football I followed the Vikings pretty closely.

by packallday555 on Sep 4, 2010 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pretty simple logic for me.

Young doesn’t do anything badly but he doesn’t excel at anything either. Reynaud was shiftier, more explosive, and added versatility in the return game that Young didn’t offer. The only area that Young was better in was pass-blocking which is a skill that Reynaud has just begun learning. Given a choice between the two I take the playmaker who has return skills. Nothing against Young as he’s reliable but I’ve never seen him make an impact play.

Gerhart’s still playing like a rookie but he pushes the pile and looks good in short-yardage situations. He’s looked a little lost at times this preseason but I see a lot more potential in him than I do in Young.

by CanadianViking on Sep 4, 2010 1:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

The only think I can see Young doing better

Is picking up the blitz. AD might be doing it well but Young seemed to have the knack ot it. That might be why we kept him.

It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...

by Grime on Sep 4, 2010 8:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think you're right that we kept him for his blocking.

The only other reason I could think of is that the Giants wanted Reynaud more than they wanted Sage and that the 5th in 2011 is for Reynaud. The reason I think this might be the case is that the conditional 2012 pick is tied to Rosenfel’s playing time.

by CanadianViking on Sep 4, 2010 8:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's exactly why they kept him.

I believe A.Young picked-up every single 3rd down blitz thrown at him.
That’s what we need the most…..especially with our O-line.
Keeping Favre on his feet is priority #1…IMO

by chaosg on Sep 4, 2010 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fair enough, and understandable. Maybe I tend to gravitate towards the solid, reliable guy because that’s what I’ve become accustom to with Grant.

by packallday555 on Sep 4, 2010 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's cool.

Every team needs a good mix of the steady guys to go with the flashy ones.

by CanadianViking on Sep 4, 2010 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't be surprised if these picks get traded

before the start of the season…but who knows. SKOL VIKES!

I'm still a Minnesotan at heart...

by urluckyday on Sep 4, 2010 12:34 AM CDT reply actions  

as much as i like toby

i wish we wouldn’t have drafted him. then we wouldn’t be in this situation. i had high hopes for toby, at first, and for the same reasons you point out, i would rather have darius. He brings so much more to the table. i’m very upset that we unloaded him. I also think we should’ve kept sage over tj, but ill go ahead and trust childress on this one since i haven’t seen him in training camp.

by koooolaid1087 on Sep 4, 2010 12:36 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I agree

Gerhart is heading toward bust status. Meanwhile, guys we passed on in the 2nd round like Eric Decker look great. But remember, we traded up to get Gerhart which at this time seems even dumber than drafting him in the first place.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 5:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

A little early on that analysis

TG headed toward bust status? I would take that bet. For a guy that no one knew could catch a ball he has done well. For a big back he cuts well. When it comes time to move a pile I think he can do the job.

As people watch the scat backs like Spiller, McCluster, Jahvid Best they will be amazed with their speed and quickness. They will lament that the Vikes needed a back like that. But the time will come when we need to grind the clock out. Move the chains. Toby can help us do that. And break a big one.

You could be right about him but I have seen nothing but talent learning to be better each and every week.

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 6:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

In order to move the pile there needs to be movement up front

The offensive line is not what it is hyped up to be and needs some immediate attention.

Toby was a pretty dam good runner in college. No doubt.

And he appears to be a good back in his limited appearances this preseason.

But he does not look as good as Best.

Best was a Heisman candidate prior to last year and was well on his way to being in that discussion until he got hurt.

IMO they would have been better served getting Best if they wanted a RB early.

I think Best will terrorize us this year with his speed whereas I think Toby will not see as many snaps as Best.

by MarkSP18 on Sep 4, 2010 7:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes, Best is good.

But that doesn’t mean TG will not be good or better. Making the claim that TG is on the way to bust status is just a little premature.

The Vikes were just not looking to pick up the scatbacks this year. They are building a big line that plays smashmouth.

I am going to eat crow if this O-Line is crappy. But I expect you to do the same if they are not.

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

I did not say Toby is on his way to bust status

I just think that Best may have fit us better.

But I wanted a QB in the first round anyway as you know.

I will eat the crow now and say that if the line is good or even is able to maintain there level from last year then “I was wrong”.

But my viewpoint has never been about this year as you should know. It has been about beyond 2010.

Moving up to get a Pouncey, Iupati, or Bulaga would have solidified a spot for years to come. Trading for Gaither or Marcus McNeil would solidify a spot for years.

Getting a highly rated young offensive linemen early would have been great as they probably would not have been forced into action and could have learned for a year.

Since the Vikings were pretty much set this year and the offensive line was the only group with multiple starters in their 30s, I thought it would be prudent to bring in a couple of players especially one that could play left tackle.

That has been my viewpoint on the team building for this season. I was willing to give up draft picks because the free agent class next year will be huge most likely due to the RFAs becoming UFAs.

I was looking past this year when thinking about the draft.

So if you want me to eat crow I will but in next year’s draft and free agency we will need to address these areas even moreso and we will need to address QB too.

by MarkSP18 on Sep 4, 2010 12:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

if it were as easy as you suggest, it might have happened

"We have a right to be proud, for in our veins flows the blood of many brave races who fought as the lion fights for lordship. Here, in the whirlpool of European races, the Ugric tribe bore down from Iceland the fighting spirit which Thor and Odin gave them, which their Berserkers displayed to such fell intent on the seaboards of Europe, ay, and of Asia and Africa too, till the peoples thought that the werewolves themselves had come."
-from Bram Stoker's Dracula

by NMVike on Sep 4, 2010 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

well of course he won't Best doesn't have AD in front of him

I mean if we had picked up Best I highly doubt he would be seeing more touches that Toby this year.

It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...

by Grime on Sep 4, 2010 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

I couldn’t believe you guys took Gerhart over Best. Though I was assuming that you guys were looking for a replacement for Taylor too.

by packallday555 on Sep 4, 2010 7:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

we didn't draft Gerhart over Best. We traded down and drafted Cook

"We have a right to be proud, for in our veins flows the blood of many brave races who fought as the lion fights for lordship. Here, in the whirlpool of European races, the Ugric tribe bore down from Iceland the fighting spirit which Thor and Odin gave them, which their Berserkers displayed to such fell intent on the seaboards of Europe, ay, and of Asia and Africa too, till the peoples thought that the werewolves themselves had come."
-from Bram Stoker's Dracula

by NMVike on Sep 4, 2010 9:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well yeah, you kinda did. You COULD have taken Best had you guys not traded the pick to the Lions.

by packallday555 on Sep 5, 2010 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Our FO obviously did not grade Best as 1st round talent

We have to compare apples to apples here. Gerhart was not even our first pick, Chris Cook was. If anything, you might say we took Cook over Best.

"We have a right to be proud, for in our veins flows the blood of many brave races who fought as the lion fights for lordship. Here, in the whirlpool of European races, the Ugric tribe bore down from Iceland the fighting spirit which Thor and Odin gave them, which their Berserkers displayed to such fell intent on the seaboards of Europe, ay, and of Asia and Africa too, till the peoples thought that the werewolves themselves had come."
-from Bram Stoker's Dracula

by NMVike on Sep 7, 2010 1:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Query
Gerhart is heading toward bust status. Meanwhile, guys we passed on in the 2nd round like Eric Decker look great. But remember, we traded up to get Gerhart which at this time seems even dumber than drafting him in the first place.

What makes you think Gerhart is “heading towards bust status”?

Decker looked decent. Not great. He looked competent, I’ll even say good, against Minnesota’s 3rd string and bubble players. We’ll see what happens to him when he gets to play against the big boys, the tale may be different then.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Sep 4, 2010 8:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Gerhart's stats

In three preseason games,

19 rushes, 64 yards

5 catches, 14 yards

no touchdowns. He has barely shown anything on the field. Not every good college player can make it in the NFL.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately,

every running back on our roster put up bad stats in the preseason. Reynaud averaged about 3.3 yards per carry, Young averaged about 2.2, and Peterson only average 3.2 per carry. I’m hoping that all three of our remaining backs look much better once our starting O-line is settled or we could be in trouble.

by CanadianViking on Sep 4, 2010 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

24 touches and he's already a bust?

Can you imagine if that limited number of touches would be universal when evaluting talent? TJack would be working at Wal-Mart if that were the case…not that there’s anything wrong with that.

"We have a right to be proud, for in our veins flows the blood of many brave races who fought as the lion fights for lordship. Here, in the whirlpool of European races, the Ugric tribe bore down from Iceland the fighting spirit which Thor and Odin gave them, which their Berserkers displayed to such fell intent on the seaboards of Europe, ay, and of Asia and Africa too, till the peoples thought that the werewolves themselves had come."
-from Bram Stoker's Dracula

by NMVike on Sep 4, 2010 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just to clarify..

The 2011 pick is a 5th rounder. The 2012 pick is conditional based on Sage’s playing time.

I don’t like the move. I think we kept the wrong QB. And now we don’t know who will be returning punts. I’d say Harvin over Allen. But that’s not ideal with the amount of responsibility he already has.

If we turn around and use the pick for depth at O-line or CB I might feel a little better.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 4, 2010 12:39 AM CDT reply actions  

I understand everyone hates moving Sage instead of TJack...

but keep in mind how expensive Rosenfels was for a backup…I don’t care how well he was playing…a backup QB is supposed to be nothing more than a backup and not making the kind of money that he was (but that’s of course not his fault).

I’m glad we made some sort of move @ QB, but I’m not sure why we had to move Reynaud…what was the point of that?

Depth @ O-Line and CB would be nice…and necessary with this move which would put Asher Allen in harms way…so we’ll see.

I don’t think that the Vikings front office is as stupid as we think they are, and I think they got the best offer that we could for Rosenfels and that we’re not done makin’ moves.

Only time will tell.

I'm still a Minnesotan at heart...

by urluckyday on Sep 4, 2010 12:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Don't blame Childress for this trade. Blame Sage.

If you piece together all the little details from different sources, it’s easier to understand the Sage part of this deal:
 
Sage was promised a chance to compete for the starting job last year before Favre came in. Problem is, Childress never wanted him. That was Spielman’s move.

When Favre became available and Childress was able to get him in, Spielman and Wilf signed off on it. That was it for Sage and Childress. Any chance of a good working relationship between them was officially over, as Sage felt he got screwed by Childress.

Instead of being a man about it and zipping his lip, Sage pouted. Remember Childress’ earlier comments this spring? He said Sage “didn’t make the adjustment too well to his new team and playbook last year”, suggesting Sage was struggling to fit in, when the more likely story is, Sage didn’t WANT to fit in. He felt cheated out of a fair shot at the starting gig by the Favre signing, and he set out to make Childress pay for it.

Childress answered by stucking it to him all last year, letting Jackson do mop up duty in blow out games, not giving Sage any work. Even if Sage was the better backup QB, barring an injury to Favre, it really didn’t matter who got those garbage minutes. Might as well give them to the QB who wasn’t being a bitch over some ‘broken promise’ about getting a chance to start. Jackson kept his mouth shut like a good team player, and Childress rewarded him for it, but more importantly, used the opportunity to send a message to Rosenfels.

Remember the anonymous reports about a ‘schism’ in the locker room last year? How about the story that Favre hated Childress and thought he had no clue? Then there was that phony report that Favre was definately not coming back, which forced Favre to publicly deny ever saying that, while simultaneously making Shinacoe look bad for passing along what he heard from someone on the roster. So who was that someone? Who was the anonymous jerk passing along all those juicy rumors to the media that were causing all the preseason headaches last year and again this year?

Sage. At least, that’s what some officials within the organization have concluded.

No head coach can let that kind of divisive behavior go unanswered. But what about Favre? All of those rumors involved him, too. Recall that as soon as he made his return official, he was forced to have a private meeting with Childress, followed by two other player meetings, so that he could tell ‘whoever it was’ to “knock it off, and start being a team player.”

Childress’ work to bring in Favre provides a logical explanation for Sage’s bad relationship with the head coach. It also offers a logical explanation for why T-Jack was kept despite a bad preseason, and Sage was jettisoned.

Moral of the story?

The head coach and future Hall of Famer/starting QB have a lot more clout than the journeyman 3rd stringer who has never won a starting job in 9 years with 4 different teams, so Sage should have kept his mouth shut and went with the program. Had he just accepted graciously the chance to backup a legend like Favre, he would very likely still be with the team right now, and the odds-on favorite to take over the starting job next year. Jackson was not kept because he’s ‘better’. He was kept because Sage had to go.

The funny part? Sage whined and gossiped his way out of Minnesota because he didn’t like seeing Favre brought in for a lousy 2 years to play ahead of him. Well, now he can sit on the bench behind a young Eli Manning for the rest of his career.

by rovibe on Sep 4, 2010 1:09 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

That's some imagination you go there, Rovibe.

:: chuckling ::

I keep waiting for you to say, “And the murderer is…SAGE!” Or “And he’d have gotten away with it, too, except for one small detail…”

All kidding aside, this is pure speculation, Rovibe. Unless you have some hard proof this, it seems pretty darn unlikely. Sorry man, it’s a cool theory but that’s all it ever will be (barring some dramatic revelation down the road at some point).

Either way, I’d take a whiny Sage over a quiet but crappy T-Suck, anyday. Time for that failed experiment to flat-out just go away like a bad dream.

by Wytefang on Sep 4, 2010 2:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's not imagination, there are reports suggesting this

From two weeks ago!

Some think Sage Rosenfels was Jason Cole’s source

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/08/22/some-think-sage-rosenfels-was-jason-coles-source/

“Earlier today, Brett Favre met with his teammates in an effort to get one or more of them to quit talking to the media about a possible rift (or, dare we say, schism) between Favre and coach Brad Childress.

…Jason Cole’s report, which relied in part on an unnamed Vikings player who said, “Brett thinks Childress has no clue about offense.”…some think that Cole’s source was quarterback Sage Rosenfels.

It’s hardly a stretch; Rosenfels is the obvious choice. He arrived via trade in 2009, with the belief he’d be competing only with Tarvaris Jackson for a shot at finally becoming an NFL starter. And it was V.P. of player personnel Rick Spielman, not Childress, who championed the move to get Rosenfels.

Then, Favre became available and he eventually unretired, again. Rosenfels ended up being the odd man out in 2009, making not a single game appearance for the first time since his rookie year in 2001.

This year, Rosenfels was put on ice for large chunks of the offseason program, with Tarvaris Jackson and Joe Webb, a sixth-round rookie drafted to be a receiver, getting all of the work. Last week, with everyone expecting Favre to return, Jackson took limited snaps and Rosenfels was showcased against the Rams, throwing more than 30 passes and getting into separate sideline tiffs with Childress and offensive coordinator Darell Bevell.

Apart from the fact that Rosenfels would have the greatest natural incentive to tell tales about the teammate who screwed up Rosenfels’ shot at being an every-down quarterback is the fact that a pipeline already exists between Rosenfels and Cole. It dates back to Cole’s tenure with the Miami Herald, covering Rosenfels when he was a backup quarterback with the Dolphins. Last year, Cole interviewed Rosenfels after Favre reiterated his Second Annual Retirement, only a couple of weeks before his Second Annual Unretirement.

So if people outside the organization are connecting the fairly large dots, people inside the organization likely are doing it, too. And maybe that’s what Rosenfels wants. If the team decides that he can’t be trusted, maybe he won’t have to spend the entire 2010 season all dressed out, with no place to play."

Well, he’s out of Minnesota at least, but good luck getting on the field Sage you whining snitch!

by Ace991 on Sep 4, 2010 3:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

OH, this is hilarious.

So to prove your speculation you link to more speculation. Not to mention it was by Mike freaking Florio. I won’t even go in to how much of an idiot that guy is.

Oh and we can trust everything that ESPN and CNNSI says can’t we? Show me where anyone has offered on shred of proof that Sage was the “leak”.

But I’m sure your waterboy, towelboy, or janitor was a very trustworthy source, rovibe. Sorry I doubted you.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 4, 2010 3:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

What are you talking about?

The link post your referring to wasn’t posted by me. And I read that post — Florio didn’t write it, so apparently your reading comprehension sucks. Florio just stuck it on his blog. The writer he cited is a respected NFL beat writer. What are you? Some random guy on the internet who has a man crush on a washed up QB who’s started 12 games in 10 years. Whatever. I’ll stand by my source. Considering they know all the players and coaches, I’ll take their insights over your blind guesses.

by rovibe on Sep 4, 2010 3:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Florio linked to the speculation while further speculating..LOL

I was addressing both of you. Maybe confusingly so.

What blind guesses!? I’m not guessing about anything. I’m defending someone. Those stories were straight-up speculation. Show me where they offered proof.

No, I don’t have a man crush on Sage, I just think he’s better than T-Jack. Which doesn’t say a whole lot.

And it’s not about him as a player. You guys are attacking his character. And that is wrong. If you want to say T-Jack if a better QB, that’s fine. I’ll argue against it, but I respect you opinion. But I’m not going to sit here and let people attack his character for no reason. It’s wrong.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 4, 2010 5:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

... So....

You’re attacking Jason Cole’s character, who’s made it in the league as a sports reporter for several years now, because you don’t want to believe that Sage might have been a bit sour that his chance to FINALLY start for a team was ruined? Honestly, to me, the more believable story is the one that Sage couldn’t keep his trap shut. Is it speculation? I guess, if you want to look at it as black-and-white. Nobody has come out and solidly confirmed it was Sage. Yet. But for the hint to be put out there, in print no less, is a strong indication it’s a bit more than speculating.

by Frost on Sep 4, 2010 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

QUIZ for the Sage lovers out there

Study this list of QB’s and see if you can tell what they all have in common (besides the fact that they all sucked or still suck in the NFL):

Tony Banks
Jay Fiedler
Ray Lucas
Brian Griese
A.J. Feeley
David Carr
Tarvaris Jackson

Give up yet? These are just SOME of the QB’s Sage Rosenfels has served as a backup to, and every single one of them was able to stay ahead of Rosenfels on the depth chart before coaches gave up on Sage and either released him or traded him away.

by rovibe on Sep 4, 2010 4:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

part two of the Quiz

Now study this list, and say what these quarterbacks have in common:

Gus Frerrotte
Brooks Bollinger
Brad Johnson
John David Booty
Joe Webb
Tyler Thigpen
Kelly Holcomb
Sage Rosenfels

The answer: all of these quarterbacks were out-competed by Tarvaris Jackson at one point or another.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 6:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Heavens no

If T-Jack were in a wheelchair Chilly’s ego would not have allowed any of these QBs to start in front of T-Jack. end/sarcasm

But I did watch John Booty QB the texans the other night. He looked big and strong. Passes were great.They came out quick. He looked the part.

Thigpen looked pretty good the other night from Miami. (As an aside Pennington looked fabulous.)

Back-ups in preseason usually look good. Its a different ballgame to look good in practice against the Vikings defense.

But I suspect that most of us would rather believe that the coaches don’t know what they are doing. To say otherwise means you have to (gasp) trust them.

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 6:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

You may be right.

But I don’t think it’s wrong to ever doubt a decision they make. They’ve obviously made a lot of good decisions and built a good team. That doesn’t mean they are always right.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 4, 2010 6:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

But it does mean that people

who have been shouting about “Chill’s ego” and “T-Jack lovefest” for the last 3 years are flat out wrong.

This coaching staff has been together for an unheard of 5 years. The head coach was just awarded a 5 Million per year extension. How anyone can believe that they don’t know how to evaluate players and make decisions in the teams best interest is beyond me.

Have they made some errors? Yes. Tyrell Johnson comes to mind. They have not coached him to his potential or they misdrafted him. We will see. But the only way to judge a back-up QB is when they replace your starter. And so far they have not been wrong about that.

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 6:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

"T-Jack lovefest"

They say, “Chilly loves T-Jack”

The other one is “T-Jack has something on Childress.”

If either one were true, wouldn’t Jackson be grossly overpaid? Right now, as a backup, he is earning almost 1/40th of what our starter will be paid. Even by NFL standards, if Jackson goes this year without a new contract, he will be underpaid.

Now, from Jackson’s perspective, he may be sick of all the Vikings fans that give him no respect or benefit of the doubt. If I were him, I would be sorely tempted to take a lesser offer to another city, just to get away from these fans. I hope he can be persuaded otherwise, but most likely he will not even sign an extension with the Vikings, simply because he wants to get away from Vikings fans.

I guess as a Vikings fan, I don’t feel like the typical Vikings fan is very football-smart. Thank goodness we have Childress, Spielman, and company to direct the ship.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 7:36 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I take exception to that

I’m not intelligent. not not smarter um est… TJack is a stop gap and honestly most people will state he is not ever going to be a solid starter. Now if you think that makes us unintelligent because we’re disagreeing with the genius leprechaun, well I guess that’s ok with me.

It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...

by Grime on Sep 4, 2010 8:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

I sure am glad you qualified that!
I guess as a Vikings fan, I don’t feel like the typical Vikings fan is very football-smart. Thank goodness we have Childress, Spielman, and company to direct the ship.

Maybe I could get smarter if I were a Bears fan.

Dude, I don’t even what to make of you.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Sep 4, 2010 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Huh.

Well, he looked like absolute shit when he was with us. So good on him to finally start putting some zip behind the ball I guess. Hopefully it doesn’t come back to bite us for releasing him, somehow.

by Frost on Sep 4, 2010 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not exactly.

TJ did not beat Brad Johnson in a competition. TJ got the end of season garbage time after the team was mathematically eliminated from the playoffs.

TJ didn’t really beat Thigpen as he was released as a rookie (and Thigpen was better when he played on a worse team, not counting TJ’s garbage time stats). Thigpen was released primarily to hold on to Kelly Holcomb for his veteran experience and loyalty to Childress.

So far, TJ has beaten rookie flyer pick Joe Webb, who may be an NFL WR rather than QB…whoop-de-do!

by KC Viking on Sep 4, 2010 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not David Carr

Carr did a pretty decent job with an awful team. Perhaps he should have been the Vikings’ QBotF instead of Jackson all along since he became available in 2006.

by KC Viking on Sep 4, 2010 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with that

Carr got a raw deal in Houston. Remember their offensive line? NFL record for most sacks given up on a single QB – 76!! As soon as he went to the Giants, he looked much more comfortable when he got on the field for an injured or resting Eli Manning. I wanted him in MN before San Francisco got him.

by rovibe on Sep 4, 2010 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's not speculation.

Joke all you want. Most of what you read has already been reported through various reputable outlets (ESPN, CNNSI, etc.).

The rest? Direct from a team employee who has better insight than anything you’ll get through the papers.

Easy to sum it up: Sage hated Childress, and that’s a battle no 3rd string QB can win. But he also caused a problem for the rest of the team, primarily the star QB. Might as well have just came right out and demanded a trade, because there was no way he could stick around after all that.

by rovibe on Sep 4, 2010 3:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Circumstantial evidence

But I was putting some of that together too. There has been this speculation in the press prior that the disgruntled player was Rosenfels. Childress already has one prima donna future HoF quarterback to deal with, so why deal with it from your 3rd string clipboard holder who hasn’t won a starting job since he has been in the league? It is divisive and could hurt the team in the long run. It was a good move.

I wish Sage luck and Eli some non starting time so that Sage can raise the value of that drat pick. Do I worry about a Sage led Giants beating the Vikings? Not even with TJack as the starter.

It may take a village to raise a child, but it takes a Viking to raze a village.

by Luft Krigare on Sep 4, 2010 3:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hope he plays when we're facing the Giants

That’d be cool, because then, after they get a big lead, Sage can give us the victory.

by Frost on Sep 4, 2010 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

+1

Rec’d. Great post, rovibe.

I am just thankful we have Coach Childress to steer us around icebergs like Captain Schism (Sage Rosenfels).

When Rosenfels first signed, there was some Minnesota sports columnist who talked to Rosenfels’s coach from Iowa State. That guy went on about what a great leader Sage was. Well as it turns out, maybe he lost that somewhere between college and Eden Prairie. Goodbye to the jerk. Hello, draft pick.

Too bad we lost Reynaud, though. I wish him well.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 6:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Fine. Believe everything you hear. Sage is just a big fat jerk.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 4, 2010 6:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Can you tell me a time when reports were untrue?

So far, all I can think off of the top of my head is the “Revis is close to a new deal!” report, and even then its just one guy, and everybody else is saying he’s an idiot. Honestly, if a reporter is willing to put something in print, then they are VERY confident in their sources. The odds of it being true are far greater than it being some fabricated lie the reporter decided to just… float out there, ‘cause he apparently doesn’t care about his credibility.

Come on, man. Use your head here.

by Frost on Sep 4, 2010 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

Really man?

First off, Jason Cole never named his source. Reports came out after that saying it just has to be him. Reasons? Cole worked in Miami the same time as Sage did, and Cole once interviewed him. Is that good enough for you?

Secondly, is that really the only time that a sports writer has been dead wrong? How about all those Lebron James reports? That’s just one example. You can’t trust everything the media tells you. Besides most of the “Sage is a leak” reports came from blogs.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 5, 2010 2:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

Is it just me MB?

I thought the Vikes ran a fairly decent clubhouse. High character guys and everybody working together. I guess I missed that part last year where Sage just ripped a huge hole in the clubhouse over Farve. Maybe it was just going to happen this year. RUBBISH>

Sage was protecting the final year of a NON-guaranteed 3 Million dollar contract. He was not going to risk 1/3rd of the best contract he has ever received and become some bad penny in the clubhouse. Did they keep him away from Webb? No. OMG what if he had poisoned his mind?
The conspiracy theories are rampant. Is it season yet?

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 6:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sage can now go to the Giants

What really changed my mind was seeing Joe Webb play in the fourth preseason game. It wasn’t what he did, it was the way he carried himself. He has a natural confidence and easy-going nature. I believe he could win a game as a starter this year if it was necessary. Probably would be tough, but I think it could happen.

Meanwhile, Sage takes credit for Favre’s success last year (in the StTrib this morning).

It’s pretty ironic that Sage is now happy to go to the Giants as a backup to a younger quarterabck, when the whole time with the Vikings he was sore that he had not won the starting job, but been out-competed fair and square by a younger quarterback, and ended up as the #3, behind Brett Favre.

Sage can take his schism stuff over to the Giants. Goodbye, Sage.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Webb=Future?

I have a good feeling about Webb, too. It is based on intangibles, i.e. that “natural confidence and easy-going nature” you cite, so it is not something one can argue.

But yeah, I hope Webb is ready to step up in a couple years if Tarvaris can’t handle the starting job after Favre retires for real and for good.

by Midnight Rambler on Sep 4, 2010 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

You're missing something here

Wrong logic. It wasn’t about keeping the money, it was about getting back to what was promised him in the first place – a chance to start. The same team officials who’ve leaked most of this info also made it clear what Sage wanted wasn’t the paycheck, it was a new home. Well, he’s got it now. Problem for Sage is, he’d have done better waiting until next year in MN, or getting traded to a team that needs a new starter. He’ll never get his wish in New York behind Manning.

by rovibe on Sep 4, 2010 8:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nice journalistic paradox...

You’ve quoted a first hand source as a positive character reference and then used it to make completely the opposite point.

Think about that for a second…

Speculation is speculation. Nuff said.

by Curvespace on Sep 4, 2010 7:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

And Sage provided positive leadership with the Vikings at what time?

Ah yes. Never.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't realise...

that you worked deep within the organisation and were present during all QB training sessions and meetings. Were you the unnamed source? ;)


“I learned a ton from (offensive coordinator) Darrell Bevell and (quarterbacks coach) Kevin Rogers. Stuff that I’ll try to carry onto anything I can help Eli with or those coaches with,” Rosenfels told the Star Tribune. “Obviously, playing with Brett was a once-in-a-lifetime experience that I’ll cherish forever. … But I’m excited about this opportunity.”

and:

"I feel like I put all of my energy into having as much success as I could have and this team could have over the course of the last year and a half. I have no regrets about how I approached coming to work every day. I have the utmost respect for those guys on that team.

I know, I know, what a total douche… who’d want a guy like that in the organisation?

by Curvespace on Sep 4, 2010 7:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

The copyrighted article who stole, no wait, “borrowed” from the Star Tribune this morning, also includes Sage Rosenfels taking credit for some of Favre’s success last year.

True leaders do not say that in public, even if it is true. If he were such a classy guy, why say that now? If it were so obviously true, why not say that before he was traded?

Goodbye, Sage.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 8:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeeeeeeah...

Well, you have an agenda with the guy that’s clearly going to be impossible to overcome. That’s your prerogative.

All I’m saying is that we know very little about back-room discussions, training ground chat, locker room talks, agents phone-calls, any of this stuff, so to make character calls with a bare minimum of evidence is more than a little harsh. Journalists who cite unnamed sources need a kick in the balls at the best of times, to then make assumptions as to who this might have been… well, it’s speculation squared – worthless.

The guy came in, did a job to the best of his ability and I wish him well in NY. I think he’s a good back-up QB.

by Curvespace on Sep 4, 2010 8:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

It’s no use arguing with them anymore. If it helps them feel good about the trade to say he’s such a bad locker room guy, fine. Even without a shred of evidence.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 4, 2010 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

lol Yeah...

reporters do it all the time, just make up their unnamed sources. Or, MAYBE, they CAN’T name their sources, because then they’d never get sources again. I don’t think you understand how important credibility is for these guys. You all bash them a ridiculous ammount of the time, but the fact of the matter is that 9 times out of 10 they’re reporting accurate stuff that they’ve actually been told.

by Frost on Sep 4, 2010 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Don't you see it?

There’s one obvious person he made a point NOT to thank — Childress, the guy who ruined Sage’s gig by going after Favre shortly after Spielman brought Sage in. The guy hated Childress for that, and that’s why he’s now gone.

by rovibe on Sep 4, 2010 8:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

"We gotta move these refrigerators..."

“That’s the way you do it.” – Dire Straits

It’s a decent investment. Instead of throwing 22 people to the curb to be picked over for free by the rest of the league, we now only have to throw 20 souls overboard, and we gained two future draft choices. When you have more good talent than the rules allow you to keep, you need to get what you can while you can.

Sage cost four times TJ’s salary. Some people talk like he was four times as good as TJ, but I’m not exactly buying that.

Reynaud is someone the Giants wanted, and unless the team with which you attempt to work out a trade says yes to the deal and signs the paperwork, you do not get any trade with them. Trades a voluntary and optional. Only two days remained to do one before the roster cuts were required.

“The girls all get prettier at closing time.” – Mickey Gilley

by Elgar on Sep 4, 2010 1:14 AM CDT reply actions  

If you are going to quote songs you have combine the logic.

The second quote is made irrelevent because of the line after the first quote, “you get your money for nothing and your chicks for free.” Who cares if they get prettier at closing time when you already have tons of free chicks."

The point which is almost unrelated to the rest of the post: We didnt need to get rid of Reynaud. He didnt deserve to be cut or traded. He should be on this team.

by Codypc21 on Sep 4, 2010 1:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

But we did need to get rid of Reynaud...

because the Giants wanted him. Consider that the Cowboys only got a 7th round pick for Crayton.

Clearly your emotional attachment to Reynaud is clouding your vision (and consider I have a Reynaud Vikings’ #82 jersey, and I used to wear #27 when I played football, because 27 is 3 cubed, and three is a warlock’s number, but then I digress, don’t I?.)

by Elgar on Sep 4, 2010 1:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

great guitar work by Mark Knopfler on that one

You may have taken the lyrics a bit out of context , I’m afraid.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 6:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

like any good quilt maker would...

Ask not what these lyrics can do for you, ask what you can do for these lyrics.

I also own several axes, and not the kind the guys on the roster are getting.

by Elgar on Sep 4, 2010 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Disappointing decision which leads to other questions...

..specifically about our coaching staff and their ability to ignore crappy play by T-Suck. Bizarre. Sage looked better and T-Suck has lucked, well, sucky as usual. At this point, it just looks like Chilly is too proud to admit his mistake with the failed T-Suck experiment.

Ugh. Hope we get a darn good draft pick for losing 2 players.

by Wytefang on Sep 4, 2010 2:25 AM CDT reply actions  

“It’s only words, and words are all I have to take your heart away.” -Bee Gee’s

A pair of draft picks in the hand are worth more than twenty-two on the waiver wire.

by Elgar on Sep 4, 2010 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Vikings Traded the Wrong QB

The Vikings traded the wrong QB to the NY Giants. Sage Rosenfels is 3 times the QB that Tarvaris Jackson will ever be. Heck, even rookie QB Joe Webb is three times the QB when compared to Tarvaris Jackson….

Chilly is a stubborn Head Coach, he can not admit that he made a mistake trading up to draft Travaris Jackson…..

When Chilly was the Offensive Coach for the Philadelphia Eagles, he never got to call the plays for the offense, Head Coach Andy Reid called all the plays. So what makes Chilly think that because he is the Head Coach of the Minnesota Vikings, that he is qualified to call the plays for the offense?

Chilly is good at recognizing football talent (some of the time) but when Chilly went out on a limb for Tarvaris Jackson, he really goosed the moose!

Maybe the Vikings can trade chilly for “Wally the Beer Man”!

Everyone we meet in life give us happiness, some by their arrival, others by their departure!

by Parnelli on Sep 4, 2010 2:30 AM CDT reply actions  

well...

Maybe the Chillster is confused by the fact he is in fact getting paid seven figures annually to be head coach of an NFL franchise.

Do you think Vince Lombardi was not a stubborn head coach?

Do you think the Giants preferred TJ and Chillster just crammed some Sage down their throats?

Webb is not yet three times the QB TJ is. Many people failed to notice TJ’s first move against the Bronco’s, which demonstrated that TJ has sat at the feet of the master and mastered the hard count. Webb has a lot to learn before he can snatch the pebble from the blind guy’s hand.

Even if we accept the premise that Sage is three times the QB Jackson is, he’s also four times the salary hit. It is a common misperception in Minnesota that spending their own money is a travesty, but spending Zygi’s is no biggie.

When DC Lombardi was defensive coach for the Giants, OC Tom Landry was calling the plays. Vince sent in Packer plays anyway when he was HC, and the other team even knew which ones he was going to call.

by Elgar on Sep 4, 2010 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

This isn't about Chilly's Ego

I have given up on trying to convince anyone that this isn’t about Chilly’s ego. If he hasn’t shown that he and Spielman make the decisions necessary to move the Vikings forward then you just are not watching the moves that are being made. If Chilly really was an egotist he would have started T-Jack and never gone out and gotten Farve.
 Draft Picks:
Sage is a ten year journeyman quarterback with a 3 Million dollar contract. We are lucky to get a 5th round pick. If he were younger, cheaper, or had more starts maybe he would be worth more.
Reynaud is not a successful WR. He is not a proven RB. He is a ST performer. A good versatile player. These are the kinds of guys a team selects in the 6th and 7th rounds of the draft. ( Like Webb, Brinkley, Sanford) Getting a conditional pick for him was a good and fair move.

Who will return kicks? Was I the only guy watching Albert Young do a fair job?

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 6:09 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Correct, and if there is a work stoppage Sage will be 34 (with 12 NFL starts) before he gets another shot at starting for the vikings. It’s great to get picks for guys who’ll likely be cut.

Also DONT FORGET ABOUT clearing out the 3 million it has to be a big deal for Wilf as much as is on the table right now for the team. Maybe now he approves 3 million on Houshmandzadeh?

by d_fens on Sep 4, 2010 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ew.

Do not want Douchemenzada. He can just go back to Cinncinati. We’re obviously not a good enough team for him.

by Frost on Sep 4, 2010 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Factor in the money

You really have to factor in the money. With Harvin’s migraine issue and Rice out for at least 6 games (I’d bet 10). The Vikes are not deep at receiver. I’m not sure about how others feel about Berrian, but I was not impressed before they picked him up, and I’m still not impressed. My guess is the front office wanted to not only remove a QB, but jettison payroll. And that meant Sage had to go. Truthfully, I didn’t like this pick up anyway. All that said, my guess is the Vikings are going after TJ Houshmandazah (however you spell it). And say what you like about him not being a deep threat, he averages over 80 catches a year over the last 5 years and Harvin can go deep on anyone. Think about it Rice on oneside, TJ on the other and Harvin in the slot. That is one hell of a trio of receivers. As for Berrian, let him go and get his money back in the system, trade him, or let him return punts.

I’ll take TJ Housh over Berrian any day.

by llajoy on Sep 4, 2010 6:34 AM CDT reply actions  

So, Berrian's stats don't do anything for you?

I mean except for the Hamstring injured year what don’t you like?

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 6:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Last year they did not LL

Injury or not. They get paid to perform plain and simple.

TJH had a decent year with a much much worse team and QB.

by MarkSP18 on Sep 4, 2010 6:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

TJH is a good receiver.

That wasn’t my point. I simply asked what he didn’t like about BB’s stat line.
He has had one bad year. An injury year. He had great stats after the injury healed.
These are just facts. BB can go deep faster than TJ.
I understand wanting TJ to replace Rice. But I don’t see TJ replacing BB>

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 7:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

TJH would be an interesting option and is good enough to start.

The question would be would he play outside or in the slot or both?

I think he could do both like Harvin can?

by MarkSP18 on Sep 4, 2010 7:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Been over this one already

If the Vikings could bring in a genuinely fast WR, younger than BB, I’d say trade BB for whatever they could get. With Harvin perpetually questionable, and Rice on the PUP, Berrian’s stock goes way up but it’s by default.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Sep 4, 2010 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

TJ Housh over Berrian?

Really?

Berrian was hurt most of the year last year but put up great numbers in the playoffs and the entire season prior. Whereas Housh is a proven locker room cancer and not that much better if at all; which is kind of comparing apples to oranges since Housh is a possesion receiver and Berrian stretches the field.

by MinnesotaRage on Sep 4, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

What is the direction by the front office?

Trading Sage and keeping TJack is OK by me as long as they lock up TJack with a contract extension.

That is my concern. Some say the Vikings saved some money by letting Sage go because he is making about 1.5 mil more than TJack.

But if any of you believe that TJack’s agent is not going to want at LEAST Sage money then I do not know what to say. Add in the fact that his agent will know that after this season, TJack is the only viable option and he is going to want starter money.

So my question is how much do you think TJack is going to want? 5 mil per year, 4 mil per year, more?

I really did not care but I “followed the money” and figured they would go with the guy they had signed so that they had some security for the 2011 season. Obviously they no more about what they want to do in the future and of course that is their decision. As a fan though, I can question it. Here is the distinction for some of you. I question it, not necessarily criticize it. It is a gamble and a risk that they are willing to take. I can live with that. But from a marketing perspective and trying to sell tickets it does not really make people want to purchase season seats for 2011 (if they are even there) not knowing who will be the QB. Now they may not be selling the seats for next year yet but not knowing who the guy will be is a bit concerning.

There is also the talent level of the team that will demand a top notch QB. The talent level will still be pretty damn good in 2011 and a struggling QB or a QB who has not had the chance to prove it over a whole season is putting the rest of the players career’s in jeopardy too (i.e., their performance is tied to their compensation). This is not saying TJack cannot get it done but he needs to be able to show for an entire season. It is risky.

Now another couple of moves made make me question their decisions.

San Diego just signed Patrick Crayton for a 7th round pick. I think I would have been OK with him instead of Walker or Lewis. Plus he can return punts. Of course this is revisionist history but you have to believe that the Vikings knew that Crayton was available and that they were not sold themselves on Darius. Of course Dallas may not have wanted to trade Crayton in the conference so it could not have been an option. Still, it seems like they may have been able to give up a 7th for Crayton.

Then Philly signs Reggie Wells for a 6th round pick from Arizona. Wells has started the last few years and would have been a pretty good reserve or starter of DeGeare struggles.

I mean I think the front office is doing a pretty good job but the job is not over and when you see moves like these it just is curious.

I am hoping that they are going to make a couple more moves today or after the first game.

by MarkSP18 on Sep 4, 2010 6:51 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm with you

From a business standpoint this didn’t make sense. Unless you’re planning on giving Webb the keys to the kingdom next year. This just seems like a gamble. On a separate note I remember Sage taking a chunk of Kinnick stadium turf after ISU beat Iowa, so he is a bit of a douche, or at least to any self respecting Iowa Fan.

by HawkeyeVikingTwinsUnited on Sep 4, 2010 7:16 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Ten years of being a high character guy

in the NFL doesn’t buy him a pass for savoring a moment in a college rivalry game?

Really?

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 7:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

No

Not between Iowa and Iowa state. But I will admit sage has had a pretty good career in the NFL and I wish him the best. I also believe he did get a raw deal in Minnesota. But oh well. Maybe I’m dwelling a bit since I’m getting ready to go start tailgating before the Iowa game today.

by HawkeyeVikingTwinsUnited on Sep 4, 2010 7:51 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

As a Hawkeye fan I wish your tailgating time to be a success.

The team I’m not worried about. How "bout them Hawks.

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

That fits the profile of a selfish person.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 8:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

As a friend of mine said

" The Vikings have put themselves in a curious situation".

As much as I try to find the logic in their actions this one is giving me trouble.

Lets say that the Vikes believe that Sage is at the end of his career. He did look slower this preseason. They just didn’t see his potential for next year. Might as well get a draft pick now.
Yes, it is risky if Farve gets injured but we have already bet on that horse anyway.

Are there FA QBs that can play next year as well as Sage. Probably.
Will T-Jack get better? If he does then I guess he will be worth more. If not? Back to the FA market if he asks for to much.

Is there someone in this draft that they are already high on? Or a FA that they feel is the right answer that might be available? Who knows. It sure seems to point that way. But it is CURIOUS.

I’m not going to beat the Vikes FO up over certain players they didn’t trade for. To much speculation for me. I like collecting draft picks for my future QB rather than giving them away.

But your right about one thing. It does appear the FO likes the Vikings O-Line. At sometime you might have to jump on board that train. Its leaving the station next week.

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 7:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Farm

The Vikings FO is now clearly, and firmly, of the opinion that if Favre goes down, T-Jack can get the job done, a rookie 3rd stringer is plenty of backup.

In a normal circumstance, they’d be right. I mean, how many backups to the backup do you need? Only…. the Vikings O-line has been questionable in protecting an increasingly fragile 1st string QB who just had to have his ankle drained and extra lube pumped into it a couple weeks ago. Assuming that Ironman is going to make it through the season and post-season intact is an exhibit of the sort of faith by which mustard seeds move mountains.

Are they right? In the best of times, with the healthiest of players, football is a health gamble that not even Obama would take. The FO is all-in.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Sep 4, 2010 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

I am predicting that

David Garrard will be available in FA next year. They don’t seem to be very happy with his average starts down in Jacksonville. Personally, I’d take him, ‘cause he seems good at keeping down his turnovers, and he’s wiley enough to make plays when the offense will need them. He’d be a good stop-gap for us while we develop other QBs.

by Frost on Sep 4, 2010 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

We are fine

Our offensive line is going to be improved this year. Yes, Sullivan missed all of preseason, and that hurt their play at that time. But it gave Jon Cooper experience he will need as he is probably going to start the first couple of games. Cooper (and Herrera) are better run-blockers than pass-blockers, and so the Vikings might run more early on. The Vikings will be running the ball a lot this year. Maybe Gerhart changes my mind and gives this team a lift. Young will get touches. Maybe Ian Johnson makes this team, too.

We do not need Houshmanzadeh. We do not need Crayton. We have three good starters. Berrian is our deep threat. Harvin is a star. Camarillo can be the go-to guy. Walker and Lewis can contribute in situations. All of these players are highly versatile receivers who can do it all. Our tight ends are solid.

Meanwhile, has anybody seen our defense. It turns out they are really good.

Now, if we do have excess players, like a defensive lineman or somebody, yes, we can trade them, but get draft picks. Maybe we could get a backup left tackle if Patrick Brown, Ryan Cook, or Chris Clark can’t measure up. We have some aging guys on the team. We also need to draft a quarterback early next year.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 7:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

I guess that settles everything

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Sep 4, 2010 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

You make some good points Mark.

I’ve been suggesting that we trade Sage for quite a while now but I hope the picks we acquired for him and Reynaud are flipped for a LT backup. I’m not thrilled with our OL backups but Hererra, Sullivan, Cooper, and Cook can play center so we have options there. Radovich and Cook can both play RT and Cook and Degeare can backup the guard positions. The one position on the line that has no viable backup is LT which scares me because it’s the most important.

As for TJ I expect we’ll hear in the next few days that he’s signed to a two-year extension that pays him around 3-3.5 million a year with some performance based incentives that could push his salary higher or trigger an optional third year. That’s the deal I’d give him so that he gets a modest raise and has the opportunity to make starters money if he performs like a quality starter. If he fails next year we’re not on the hook for much money and can sever ties with him if necessary.

Crayton for a 7th round pick would’ve been nice but it wouldn’t surprise me if Jerry didn’t want to provide help to us as we’re one of the biggest threats in the NFC to his home Superbowl dream. I’m hoping there’s another move in the works for today that nets us a quality tackle.

by CanadianViking on Sep 4, 2010 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

You know I don't see any upside for Jackson to sign early

Sure he would get some more money this year, but other than that what does he get out of it? Assuming there is football next year, he would easily make 3-3.5 from a QB needy club and a shot at a chance to start. He might even make more if he plays his cards right.

The bottom line on the Jackson extension is that right now Jackson has more leverage than the Vikings. Now if Sage were around this would of been the complete opposite with the Vikings able to just let Jackson walk. With Sage gone the Vikings can only hope to find a different QB, pray Farve has anything left in the tank, or Webb miraculously develops quicker than anyone thought.

by PackApologist on Sep 4, 2010 8:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

This would be true

if there were not already FA and on-the-block qb’s much better than Jackson. The FA qb crop for next year is looking pretty large. The ONLY thing that would keep me from releasing Jackson is that chilly has probably told him too much. We dont need the aints picking him up and getting our whole offensive strategy.

by Codypc21 on Sep 4, 2010 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Who is out there next year that is a better fit for the Vikings?

The only one that I can think of Billy Volek. I also know that this will start a shit storm, but fortune favors the brave…Matt Flynn could be had as well. Flynn would have the benefit of knowing a similar system, be a more competent manager of the game, and has shown some real progress through this preseason.

A part from that you are going to see the same retreads that may or may not be much better from TJ.

The only exception to this analysis is if you trot out Brady, Manning, or McNabb. Bottom line is that these guys are true franchise QBs and are not going to leave the places where they are at now. To think anything different is just silly.

by PackApologist on Sep 4, 2010 11:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

And then there's the draft

I’m also going to post this here because it seems the most appropriate.

Another place the Vikes could go for next year is through the draft. I know there are many offering suggestions who would make a great QB through that avenue and have highlighted guys who would be great picks. I really don’t see this as a good solution for the Vikings for two reasons:

1. How would that help the Vikings win next year? I think everyone can agree that the Vikings are in a win now mode. Getting a rookie QB doesn’t really help you win now, instead it plans for the future. In fact I can only think of two guys who were able to do a Super Bowl run in their first two years: Marino and Roethlesburger. That’s two guys in twenty years of football. I could be wrong on this, but trusting a rookie almost seems like a waste of the talent of this football team.

2. This is a having your cake and eating too problem…or as Madden would say if you have two QB’s you really don’t have any situation. A rookie will need to develop. There is no way around this fact. Even Payton Manning needed a year to get used to the NFL and if the Vikings draft a guy he’ll need a year or three to get used to the speed and whatnot.

The problem is the Vikings already have a pet project to work on in that area: one Joe Webb. More and more it looks like the Vikings FO is going to develop him to be a QB. Great, more power to them, but if that’s their commitment how many QB’s are they going to try and train at a time? There are only so many reps and so much time that a QB’s coach can spend with each guy. Trying to train two raw guys will eventually hurt the development of one or both.

Ultimately I see this as the main reason why the Vikings will probably go more O-line for next years draft and high priority than QB next year. It’s also why the Sage trade makes me scratch my head for them as well. It seems they got rid of their best stop gap guy, the guy who could manage the team after Farve and before Webb. Sage could also be the guy to take pressure off of Webb. If you pay attention to some critique of Rodgers out there it’s from people that can’t accept anything from a QB that isn’t wearing 4. It’s a problem all QB’s who replace great players face, and it will be no different from the Vikings QB who takes the reigns after him either. If I thought Joe Webb was the guy for the future I would want at least one QB between him and Farve that way the fan base can say "well at least Webb isn’t [enter poor schmuck’s name here].

by PackApologist on Sep 4, 2010 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Volek and Flynn aren’t that bad, I think if you really wanted to start a shitstorm you could mention a certain Eagles qb who will be avaiable next year. Ya you know who I’m talkin about…

by prymetyme1 on Sep 4, 2010 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Vick

Everybody put up a hundred other scenarios why not talk about Vick, His contract is up next year right?? Not sayin I’m crazy about the guy, but he seems like the kind of athletic,mobile qb that the vikings organization likes

by prymetyme1 on Sep 4, 2010 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jackson might want to move on because of the drama but I doubt it.

I’d have to say that being the starter for the Vikings next year is the best gig he could expect to find in the NFL right now. The only teams I could see offering him a starting job next year barring injuries are Buffalo, Cleveland, Arizona, and maybe Jacksonville and none of those teams are in a great position to win right now. A lot could change between now and next year but if TJ gets offered an extension now it might be the best offer he gets to be a starter. I only see him waiting for free agency if the Vikings don’t offer him anything as the odds are he’ll mainly get only backup offers or the chance to start on a bad team.

by CanadianViking on Sep 4, 2010 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

A couple more

There are going to be far out there, but San Fran and Seattle might as well depending on how the year goes. Same with Oakland. Really all of that will turn on how thees various QB’s play though out the year.

My point is that if you are TJ, why sign the contract now? Sure most of these teams are going to be basement dwellers, but you’ll have a fresh start and a real chance to start. At the very least you can go through and use one of these lower class teams as a counter to try and get MN to pay more money when they are trying to go through the scrap heap for next year.

The best advantage to signing now for him is money now. The two best arguments for that are 1) the uncertainty towards next year and 2) the possibility of injury. I can buy into the first argument, but if I were him I would roll the dice on that one and just save like no tomorrow to be able to ride out the worst if it were to happen. The only way the second contingency can happen is if he gets on the field….and if that happens then the Vikings have already crossed into the danger zone (unless he gets hurt cleaning up on a freak play – possible but highly doubtful).

by PackApologist on Sep 4, 2010 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's well thought out and I get your reasoning.

I guess the main deciding factor is if Jackson is still happy with the organization here or not. I could understand him being fed up with all the ups and downs he’s gone through here but he’s never said anything to that effect so far so who knows. From the comments I’ve read of his it seems that his main goal is to be a starter next year and prove that he’s a good QB. I guess we’ll have to wait and see what him and the Vikings do.

by CanadianViking on Sep 4, 2010 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hope we are missing something...

because this doesn’t seem to make much sense. We all knew that based on Chilly’s comments, he was still in love with Jackson. So the Sage part doesn’t surprise me. I don’t like the Reynaud part at all. I thought he had done a great job on returns and I don’t know of another option there that’s as good. Hopefully there is a part two to this venture.

by nlemke on Sep 4, 2010 7:35 AM CDT reply actions  

I have watched Albert Young and Asher Allen both do good returns this year.

"Is it normal to wake up in the morning in a sweat because you can't wait to beat another human's guts out?"
Joe Kapp

by lifelongvike on Sep 4, 2010 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Childress and the direction of the Vikings

I recall in that horrible love boat year how frustrating it was. I knew many changes had to be made in the Vikings organization. Not least among those changes was an entirely new attitude toward playing football.

Zygi Wilf aggressively pursued and signed Brad Childress. Thank goodness. Ever since then, along with front office guys like Rick Spielman, the Vikings have had the best leadership from the top down since Max Winter, Jim Finks, and Bud Grant.

My fellow Vikings fans got used to cheering for the Dennis Green offense of the 90s that inevitably flamed out, and we all got used to mediocrity.

Well, we do not have anything in the trophy case. We have got nothing except the 1969 NFL Championship, which is overshadowed by the loss in Super Bowl IV.

Stuff had to change. Childress does it differently than the old, messed up style of the past. The basic premise of his leadership is “Good people playing good football.” That means Sage Rosenfels doesn’t cut it. I hope that means Houshmanzadeh doesn’t cut it.

It’s like Mike Singletary said, “I want winners.” That’s what we want, too.

We want the Vikings to play good football, and do what they haven’t done before. That means they have to do things differently.

And Childress, Spielman, and company are doing things differently than what people have come to expect from the Vikings. They are making the right calls, and the direction of the Vikings is good.

by medicineball on Sep 4, 2010 7:55 AM CDT reply actions  

Backups....

Isn’t it nice that our biggest “questions” with the Vikings is who they have selected as their backups?

by Vikings Pride on Sep 4, 2010 8:44 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Great point.

I think we’re all getting a little too worked up. Just need this season to start.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 4, 2010 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hell yes!

HA! Before posting this thought myself I read all the way through just to make sure no one had already said it. It’s no revelation that just about every team is SOL if their starting QB goes down. If that happens to us I can’t say I would like our chances with either TJ or Sage. I hope Webb is one of those obsessed hard-worker types…

by Jshore on Sep 4, 2010 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

TJak will be fine

I like this deal, I won’t miss Sage, but I wish they would have kept Reynaud.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, I’m looking forward to seeing Tavaris play a full season. If we see him start this year, I think he’ll do just fine!!!!

by Duluth Viking on Sep 4, 2010 10:26 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm fine with it

For the record, I am one of those who believe that Chilly has a big ego and sometimes chooses familiar guys (Pinkston, McMullen, Holcomb, Bollinger, Moats, Hicks—the only one that actually worked out) or schmucks who would owe him gratitude for an opportunity (Taylor, Frerotte, Wade, Sage) over more talented players (Thigpen, other FA QBs like David Carr, Michael Turner, etc.).

In spite of that belief, I think that this was a reasonable trade. Sage was acquired for a 4th or 5th rounder, and it’s great to get a 5th round pick in a future draft for a 30+ yo guy who has never been a starter. TJ is not as good a backup in my opinion, but in the event of Favregeddon, the fans may as well see what TJ can/can’t do. Really, if TJ were to start at least 4 games and post a passer rating under 85 as a starter with this level of talent, then it would be time to consider him a career backup (and perhaps not a good one) and move on with that in mind.

As for Reynaud, I’m a little sad to see him go just as he was beginning to become useful, but there will be a guy like him (at least in terms of providing depth and return punts) available now and in the 7th round of next year’s draft.

by KC Viking on Sep 4, 2010 10:28 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm not as hard on Childress as you but you make a lot of sense here.

If Favre goes down it wouldn’t really matter whether Sage or TJ played as we probably wouldn’t go to far. I like TJ but his next shot is his last shot with us if he doesn’t perform well and it’d be nice to get some resolution on him be it bad or good. We got good value in draft picks for two players who were on our roster bubble but I’m also disappointed we lost Reynaud as I liked him in open space.

by CanadianViking on Sep 4, 2010 10:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sage got way more playing time

In the preseason than Tavaris. So its kind of unfair to compair the 2 preseason stats which by the way don’t mean much. Much of Sage’s success came against 2nd and 3rd stringers so I don’t put much stock into it. Sage has been a backup in the league for 10 years for a reason.

Favre: It's rare to ever see a QB be so indecisive, waffle...
It's also unlikely to have one start 19 consecutive seasons.

by VikesPma on Sep 4, 2010 10:32 AM CDT reply actions  

If only we could combine Nate Davis and Joe Webb into one player, things would be a lot less complicated. Are you comfortable with Webb as the team’s third stringer if Favre and T-Jax both get hurt? Probably about as comfortable as I am if Smith or Carr gets hurt and Davis has to play.

Rosencopter getting traded to the Giants isn’t going to come back and hurt the Vikes, but it almost appears Minnesota tossed in Reynaud for free (not that it matters).

by Andrew Davidson on Sep 4, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Trade moves

F.O. got us a few more picks for a Q.B. we was going to cut anyway,Reynard I hated to see go, ill try not to second guess what they see.But for the life of me I cant see a Team clamoring to grab T.J. lets be honest here.I like T.J. but I dont see him as a Future for the Vikes I think he will always be a back up.
Looks to me we have thrown all our eggs in with Favre this year,and hoping he can play the whole Season.As to the deep future it looks like Webb is the man its that inbetween thats bothersome.Now or never seems to be the mantra and makes sense ,worry about this year cause there might not be a next one.

by speedlod on Sep 4, 2010 11:32 AM CDT reply actions  

Hopefully you are right

Next year TJ can back up Hasselback or Webb or whoever, it’ll fine as long as he doesnt start.

by Codypc21 on Sep 4, 2010 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ted Glover

Have you ever been to New Jersey? I was born and raised in NJ and it is great. Most peoples opinion of NJ is what they see from the airport and the NJ Turnpike. The area around the airport does not appropriately represent NJ. We have beautiful beaches, the pine barrens and many lakes and forests. The best part is that New York and Philly are minutes away.

by NJThor on Sep 4, 2010 11:42 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm sold

Get me a Brodeur jersey.

Favre: It's rare to ever see a QB be so indecisive, waffle...
It's also unlikely to have one start 19 consecutive seasons.

by VikesPma on Sep 4, 2010 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sounds great except for that last part.

I wouldnt want to be anywhere near either New York or Philly.

by Codypc21 on Sep 4, 2010 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Amen

Just got back from a vacation in NJ and I completely agree. Having lived in Minnesota my whole life I was pleasently surprised that the people I met in NJ were actually nicer than MN. The whole “MN nice” is not applicable to the twin cities.

by MinnesotaRage on Sep 4, 2010 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Sky Is Falling! The Sky Is Falling!

What a bunch of ninny’s and knit pickers. Are you guys really Vikings fans?

“I guess as a Vikings fan, I don’t feel like the typical Vikings fan is very football-smart.”
Are you looking into a mirror or is that you Tedy Brusky?
Give me the fans that bleed purple. The ones who paint their faces and don’t care if T-Jack or Sarah Jessica Parker is the QB. (thats one ugly QB.) The fans that knows we make it the black and blue division and that the Purple people eaters are back. I love the fans that get jucied up no matter who we play or what the “so called” experts say. Screw the fans that sit and debate with Aint’s and Fudge Packers fans when they bring their stench to our blogs. I don’t want to hear you flex you brain, flex your Viking Heart.
Who Dat is what the Aint’s will be saying when we rape, pillage and murder them on national TV. Wake up Viking Bezerkers it is time to wear your war paint and sharpen your battle axes. The road to the Super Bowl goes thru Minnesota. After Mon night the Ain’ts will go back to being the bed wetter’s of the league.

They want you to fail Because they don't want to be alone.

by Beowulf73 on Sep 4, 2010 12:21 PM CDT reply actions  

Debate is good...

but this preseason sure has brought out the naysayers and doombringers, both among the fans and experts.

Sage should have been our #2 based on ability and play on the field, and Reynaud brought specific skills to the table. As far as I can see, we traded away two good football players. But I understand the logic and the business side of the NFL, and these things happen.

Favre hasn’t missed a start since 1924, and I don’t expect him to start now. Much like Jim Sorgi of the Colts holding a clipboard behind Peyton for years, the #2 doesn’t matter. I can hold a clipboard just as well as both Sage and TJack.

If a backup QB and a PR are our biggest concerns heading into week one, I’d say we’re doing pretty well. I’m more worried about our O-Line, RB blitz pickups, and our play at safety. Regardless, we will stomp the opposition.

by toke1 on Sep 4, 2010 2:24 PM CDT reply actions  

Winning is not...

…about making up cute pet names for the new head coach at his first presser.

…about booing the guy you incorrectly perceive to be his only begotten son.

…about concluding it’s impossible for this fool to keep winning two more games every season, since they may not even have a season in 2011, and in 2012 that would mean he’s got to somehow play 18 (…oh wait, what was that I heard on the news about extending the regular season…???)

These roster dealings were probably necessary, due to the rules of the game.

As some Messiah once said, let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

Until then, Skol Vikings, let’s go!

P.S.: Remember, Denny is now out here near me in Sacramento, with Duante, coaching for some UFL team which is owned by a rich dude, who just happens to be married to the U.S. Speaker of the House. I am not making this stuff up.

by Elgar on Sep 4, 2010 2:52 PM CDT reply actions  

…except for the part where I misspelled Daunte.

by Elgar on Sep 4, 2010 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

RE the Reynaud trade...

Long time reader, first time poster…

The fact that we traded Rosenfals was, as for all the above mentioned reasons, obvious and well foreseen, but the addition of Reynaud caught most by surprise. What surprises me more though is that I haven’t really seen anyone point out since what I feel to be the obvious- we HAD to package Reynaud! When we picked up Rosenfals we gave up a draft pick for it, and I’m sure that, considering that trade ended up being less than worthless, the FO really wanted to recoup something for him. Trick is, everyone with half a brain knew that with the roster cut looming, we weren’t going to keep 4 QB’s, and that it was extremely likely that Rosenfals as the odd man out. So why trade anything to get a guy who’s going to be free in a few days anyways?

I’m sure when the Vike’s FO called the Giant’s FO, that’s exactly the conversation that occured. At some point, an exasperated Spielman or Chilly prolly went, ‘OK, so what ELSE do you want then?’ at which point, the Giants pointed out that they not only needed a backup QB, but also a punt returner- and bam, Reynaud got thrown into the package, whether the FO really liked it or not.

Makes perfect sense to me. The Vikes spent a lot of money and a draft pick to get a guy who held a clipboard, and were so desperate to at least offset SOME of their losses that they gave up a perfectly decent and considerably valuable player in the process. Here’s hoping it all works out, and that Harvin really does have a bead on those migraines, cuz lord knows we just increased his already sizeable sophmore year workload…….

by KJSegall on Sep 5, 2010 3:28 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Deathstarvikings_small
2012 Draft Player Rankings: Top 10 UPDATE 1.0
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 Mock Draft
Deathstarvikings_small
Stadium Politics and Economics
Jared-allen-minnesota-vikings__1__small
VCB: Skip Bayless Gets Owned By Chris Kluwe. Unknown If He Will French Kiss A Flamethrower.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Good News Everyone
Biggun_small
Vote:Patriots or Giants
Small
Feeling Lucky?
Morecowbell_small
Off Topic/ "Delocated" Edition
Small
FA WR for Vikings 2012
It-could-work_small
In 28 we trust, and it's staying that way
Mtdlogo_small
Twitter Mock Draft Results: TooEarlyMock
It-could-work_small
Sadly, the Manning debate likely a moot point
F6bd18c3d2372bdd64e1ee3fa5d35bf1_small
Super bowl shuffle, without all that Bear crap.
Small
Picture Perfect Pro Bowl Day

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Kira_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall