Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton's Unique Public Statement On His Addiction

5 Questions With Canal Street Chronicles

Readers of The Daily Norseman,

Since I've been a member of DN (and then for reasons only Chris knows, a contributing writer), every week this site has done a '5 Questions' segment with the opposing teams blog.  Dave Cariello, the HMFIC (that stands for Head Mother Flogger In Charge...well, what did you think it meant, you dirty minded pervs?!) from Canal Street Chronicles and I kickoff Saints Week with our first '5 Segments' installment of the season.  You can head over to Canal Street Chronicles and check out my answers to his questions.

My thanks to Dave, and let's get ready to watch the Norsemen kick the hell out of the Fleur-de-Lis!

Oh, one last thing.  I really thought long and hard about a quasi-related video for this segment.  It's kind of a thing I do for the Stock Market Report, but this is the first 5 Questions segment I've ever done (and probably the last after this hits the Interwebs and Gonzo sees it) and I really don't do a video segment for each story.  But there was one song that kept rolling through my mind as I was typing this, and I couldn't resist.  So, in my never ending quest to expand your musical minds and VIkings knowledge all at the same time may I present, for your enjoyment, 'City of New Orleans', by Arlo Guthrie.  My questions and Dave's answers are after the jump:

 

Star-divide

1.  First off, congratulations on your teams first Super Bowl title.  The NFC South has been the most schizophrenic division in football since its inception.  The team that was last in one year has come back to win the division the following year just about every season.  So can we pencil in the Buccaneers for the division title and the Saints for the wildcard, or what can the Saints do to repeat?


I wouldn't pencil the Bucs in for anything other than a last place finish in the division. It's very true that the NFC South has consistently been a "worst-to-first" division but with the Saints now Super Bowl champions for the first time in their franchises history, I think it's safe to say we can throw history out the window. They've got nearly the same team they had last year so as long as the Saints stay focused and remain healthy, I would say they've got a very good chance at repeating as division champions.

2.  As the defending Super Bowl champions, the Saints are obviously the pre-season favorites to repeat in the division.  Who do you feel will be your toughest competition in the NFC South, and in the conference overall?

Within the division it has got to be the Falcons and only the Falcons. They appear to be heading in the right direction and Matt Ryan seems like the real deal. They played the Saints tough last season and I expect beating them to become even more difficult this year. Look for Ryan to have a breakout season.

Staying within the conference, I'm definitely worried about the Green Bay Packers. They're a trendy pick among the media and I think there is good reason for that. They've got a high-scoring offense behind Aaron Rodgers that can put up a ton of points, much like the Saints. And, yes, I will admit that the Vikings are the third team on the list of NFC teams that worries me. Those should be your top three teams in the conference right there.

3.  One of the strengths of the Saints last year was their secondary.  With S Darren Sharper on the PUP, and Tracy Porter dealing with injuries throughout the pre-season, are you concerned with how the Saints secondary will match up with the Vikings receivers on Thursday?

Well, Tracy Porter has been missing practice time with injury but I fully expect him to play on Thursday night.
That being said, the only change in the Saints starting secondary from last year will be Malcolm Jenkins playing safety in place of Darren Sharper. I think the defense will miss those key interceptions that Sharper provided early last season but Jenkins seems to be transitioning fairly well and let's face it, he's a lot younger. Even if Sharper were playing, I'm not convinced he would be playing at the same level he did last year. 

The other good news for the Saints secondary is that the Vikings are a little banged up in the wide receiver department, missing Sidney Rice and with only four receivers on the roster.

4.  Keeping on the ‘nagging defensive injuries’ theme, starting linebacker Jonathan Vilma has a groin injury, starting OLB Jonathan Casillas was put on IR, and backup LB Clint Ingram is also on the PUP.  Is Casillas being out a weakness the Vikings can exploit, and how concerned are you about depth at the LB position overall?

I would be lying if I said the talent and depth of the Saints linebacking corps wasn't a serious concern of mine.
After losing Scott Fujita in free agency, signing Clint Ingram in was the only real move the team made to help improve the unit this off-season and he's now out for the first six weeks. Nice work there.

Jonathan Casillas has been with the team since last year and was elevated to a starting role during training camp. Naturally, any season-ending injury to a starter is worrisome but Casillas hasn't proven much, especially during regular season play, so I can't speculate on how big of a loss it really is.

Not surprisingly, the team signed veteran linebacker Danny Clark - who was just released by the Texans - on Monday. He's got plenty of experience as a starter but very little with the Saints. Hopefully he's a quick fix for Thursday night. If not, Vikings fans can expect to see Jo-Lonn Dunbar and/or Stanley Arnoux fill in on the outside.
Also good to know is that Jonathan Vilma practiced on Sunday and is expected to play on Thursday night, though I am slightly nervous that it's a bit of a rush and that he won't be 100%.

5.  When the Saints are firing on all cylinders, they’re almost impossible to stop.  What do you feel is the most favorable offensive matchup the Saints have on the Vikings defense, and what are your keys to the game for the Saints?

The Saints have always been incredibly successful with Drew Brees, their stable of talented wide receivers and the way in which they spread the ball around. Given how good the Vikings are with their front four and the current concerns in their secondary (trade of Benny Sapp, Chris Cook injury), I think the Saints best chance of success will be dominating through the air.

On top of passing the ball efficiently, I think the Saints need to win the turnover battle, get a lot of pressure on Brett Favre and shut down Adrian Peterson. Simple, right?

Bonus:  What's your prediction for the game?

I think the Saints match up well against the Vikings and the dropping of the Super Bowl banner before the Saints first ever game in the Superdome as champions will be too much. Saints win a close one, 38-35.

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ted that is a very well written article!!

And I agree with your version of the NFC south being the most schizophrenic conference in history. We as Saints fans remember quite some years as being a schizophrenic team or a Jeckyll N Hyde team. Hot and cold!

Keys to the game? We must stop the run, and improve on 3rd down. We were 3-11 on 3rd down last time, we won’t get away with that stat this time. It will haunt us. Protecting the football is the most important asset as well. And we don’t wanna get pass happy with your defense.

   I agree, the game Thurs night will be a thriller! 38-35 is pretty close to what I was thinking. I dreamed twice that you guys beat us 38-37 with seconds left. Hope that dream doesn’t happen LOL. I look at it as anyone’s game Thurs. night. I’m very hopeful for my Saints. And I’m hoping for a great hard fought game with no injuries,no late hits, no penalties, and no turnovers.

  And whatever happens, win lose or draw, your team will be congratulated with a hard fought game.

  Let’s make Sept.9 a best selling thriller!!

   I’m ready for some football!!!!!!!!!!

by Jricky70 on Sep 6, 2010 9:07 PM CDT reply actions  

I'll drink to that

But then again, I’ll drink to the sun rising, my dog not crapping in the house, or the air conditioner clicking on when it gets hot out.

My threshold for finding something to toast is ridiculously low. Damn you for trying to raise the standard.

"Whoever said that the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons."

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota

by Ted Glover on Sep 6, 2010 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Speaking of hot

It has been one of the hottest summers in a long time. Can’t wait till fall weather in October.

by Jricky70 on Sep 6, 2010 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

No kidding.

California Golden Blogs! To be grammatically correct, it`s "Sacramento!", not "Sacramento".

by Maisbikkja on Sep 7, 2010 6:24 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Oh Ted one more thing.

The Packers look scary for sure! And if Aaron Rodgers get’s more protection than last year, look out! I’m looking at the top 3 teams for a tight race to the end of the season. Saints Vikings and Packers. Those are the 3 that are predicted. And of course the media always picks “Dallas” as a Super bowl favorite.

   I personally just don’t see Dallas making it. They’re a talented team,but way over hyped. And Romo is not the answer to getting to or winning a Super Bowl. He can get them to playoffs, then chokes under pressure. I’m surprised he was still alive after you guys humiliated them in the playoffs.

by Jricky70 on Sep 6, 2010 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ya...

Reasons for the Cowboys to likely make the Superbowl… Supposably the Kardasian girl dating a Cowboy (Same one that dated R. Bush and the idea that the Saints won the Superbowl and the Lakers won in the NBA because a kardasian was dating a player).

However, I believe no team has ever (keyword ever) played a superbowl the year that their home hosted the Superbowl.

I believe that tradition will continue.

by Deek on Sep 7, 2010 4:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Deek, I don't understand?

How could players contracting venereal diseases, possibly help win championships?

"What is best in life?"
"To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women."

by cryhavoc on Sep 7, 2010 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

hahah

now everytime I catch a game where Dallas is playing.. I’ll be looking for people to see if they’re constantly scratching themselves due to an itchy area.

by Deek on Sep 8, 2010 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed Deek

And not with Romo under the helm. He can get them to the playoffs and that’s it.

by Jricky70 on Sep 7, 2010 7:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Before Rice

I feel Minnesota is in a little bit of disarray since Rice got injured. On top of that Harvin has hardly been with the team and Farve hasn’t looked to sharp I feel age and the pounding has finally caught up. In his press conferences he seems to be apologizing for a down year coming up. On top of that their Oline doesn’t look to good in the preseason games I’ve seen.

You guys should be able to score some points with Minnesota’s secondary being beat up. Three weeks ago I thought Minnesota was going to run all over you guys now I think it is the other way around. You guys are going to score a lot of points and the Vikes won’t keep up.

by the yooper on Sep 6, 2010 9:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Our run defense

Is still one of my concerns. Even in pre-season with our first string, we’re still giving up too much ground game. I’m hoping they can tighten that line up a little. Regardless if you have injuries or not, it’s still going to be a very tough game.

by Jricky70 on Sep 6, 2010 9:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Favre is the least of my worries

Harvin will be fine. Rice’s injury is worrisome, but I think the Camarillo trade was a great move that will prove to be a masterstroke.

"Whoever said that the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons."

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire
SB Nation Minnesota

by Ted Glover on Sep 6, 2010 9:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

+4 Ted I think Camarillo is going to have a big game and season!!!

by cali viking on Sep 6, 2010 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Eh

I’m hoping it ends up well. But if we would have kept Sapp and signed Housh we would be in much better shape. Obviously we had no way of knowing he’d be cut or that Cook would be hurt. But it happened.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 7, 2010 6:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nice article.

Looks like he got the final score backwards, though.

I'm still a Minnesotan at heart...

by urluckyday on Sep 6, 2010 9:41 PM CDT reply actions  

Great article

Arlo was the first musician I ever saw live, at Northrup Auditorium, in 1986 or so, as a kid with my dad. Mad props for tossing out some Arlo.

Vikes by 17 over the Saints.

by toke1 on Sep 6, 2010 9:48 PM CDT reply actions  

475-257

That’s why I fully expect the VIkings to win this Thursday. We outgained the Saints by over 200 yards in the NFC Championship. They won because we practically gave them the ball 5 times. Most weren’t even forced, just straight up mistakes. I do not expect us to do that again.

Not discounting what the Saints did. We screwed up, they didn’t. But I think we’re a more talented team.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 6, 2010 10:59 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, your team

gave us the worst offensive performance that game in the 4 years under Brees and Sean Payton. Our receivers were covered like glue that game. It also looked like Payton coached more conservative on offense that day for some reason as well. Don’t know why. But on that particular night, you guys were the better team, our stats were horrible. That was not typical Saints offense football.

  I think we’re both very talented teams for sure. We were damn lucky for that win that game last January. This Thursday won’t be a luck factor, it’s whatever team shows up with the most intensity. And if we let our guard down we’re in deep trouble.

by Jricky70 on Sep 6, 2010 11:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

475-257

I will except ya’ll getting more yards again if we can get more points again
With that said good luck I think it’s going to be a hell of a game

my prediction Saints 31 Vikes 19

World Champions at last

by mississippisaintsfan on Sep 7, 2010 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

I only disagree with one thing

“Most weren’t even forced, just straight up mistakes”

I watched the NFCCG game yesterday getting ready for thus and Percy H. admits in an interview the saints did a good job at stripping the ball out all game.

by blackandgoldbuddha on Sep 7, 2010 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

But even if they weren’t who cares? It’s not like them being mistakes makes it ok or less disappointing. Really, it probably makes it worse.

by packallday555 on Sep 7, 2010 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah,

It doesn’t really matter if they’re called takeaways, giveaways, turnovers, or mistakes cause they all have the same outcome. Some credit goes to the defense for turnovers and some blame goes to the offense for mistakes.

by CanadianViking on Sep 7, 2010 1:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Neither the Favre/Peterson handoff or the Favre final interception was forced in any way IMO. Not sure of all the other ones.

The first Favre interception was, he probably threw too quick in order to get rid of the ball without getting hit. Of course he got hit anyway (leading to the fine on McCray two days later)

by puddnhead on Sep 7, 2010 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

It does not make it less disappointing.

But it was uncharacteristic of the Vikings, and I don’t expect it to happen again.

 And honestly, no most were not forced. Not at all. Sorry if that offends you. To me it makes it worse. We screwed up, you guys did not.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 8, 2010 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep, it could go either way to be honest. If we play each other again this year, I won’t be surprised.

I’m so pumped for this game.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 7, 2010 6:36 AM CDT reply actions  

I'm pumped and ready too purple!

The game could go either way. The highest level of intensity is the key!

by Jricky70 on Sep 7, 2010 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

We definitely struggled against the run last year....

As a Saints fan, can I just say that I, for one, kinda dig the Vikes? I’ve got a passel of friends in and from Minnesota, and I think you guys are a great squad. I think all this animosity is nonsense. I like your quarterback, I love your runningback, and I’m looking forward to seeing how the next eighteen weeks play out.

In the immortal words of Socrates, "I drank what?"

by SaintSooner on Sep 7, 2010 7:05 AM CDT reply actions  

The Saints were always one of the teams I rooted for. Obviously losing to you guys was heartbreaking, but I still respect the Saints.

by PurplePeopleEaters on Sep 7, 2010 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

What happened to Pepe LaPew or is his name Pierre Thomas

All I hear about is Reggie (I got paid better in college) and nothing about PT. Was he hurt during the pre-season?

by SouthernNorseman on Sep 7, 2010 10:55 AM CDT reply actions  

Now can you dig you dig that SUKKKKA!!!!!

"It’s not arrogance, it’s destiny." -RKO

by Vikant on Sep 7, 2010 5:35 PM CDT reply actions  

A good Q & A . Until it came to the prediction part .

These teams don’t match up well . The weak front seven of the Saints won’t stop the vicious Viking run game . The thin Vikes secondary will need to rely heavily on the front seven . Last year it was a lopsided 257 – 475 yard difference . We had twice the first downs against the #1 Offense in the country . And we controlled the ball 2/3 of the time . As flowery as the answers were the sixth question would have to do with a poor Saints D-Line . They need the game to be close . A shoot out is the only way this one dimensional team will stay with the Vikings . Brees’s Saints will be held to under 24 . The Defense will step up the pressure . And a new Cinderella will get her invite 16 weeks early . I liked the smooth talkers disrespect for the Purple . By mentioning the team we swept twice last year first in his analysis . Gb will have to use week #7 as their Superbowl . Both GB games should have been Nooners . We will yawn our way thru them . As we fans will be accused of gloating without even opening our mouths . As the Saints falsely accuse us of as their team has been taking all the cheap shots they can .

   As Brad said . We still have Miami ten days later reguardless of who wins . It isn’t the same game to us . The Saints need this win badly to keep trying to prove they deserved to be called Champs . Their inner turmoil is their own undoing . We will be bringing a whole new Nightmare to New Orleans ! And it will be remembered as part of 2010 . Get over last year . It’s time to kick of a new beginning .

by gothicpurple on Sep 7, 2010 7:17 PM CDT reply actions  

i dont think that any disrespect was meant..

when he said that he was worried about the packers. If their was a complaint to be made it was that he was following a media trend that has been common in picking the packers. i personally think that minn is alot more of a threat because we don’t match up well(who does for that matter) with your run game.

I don’t know who would possibly remember the first game of a season as being part of the previous season where that team won the super bowl(unless you meant the game was played in the same calender year not season?). The saints could lose by forty and all its going to do is make me terrified for this season and really grateful they were able to pull it out in the playoffs last year. either way i don’t expect it to possibly match the excitement of last years game. I have more of a feeling that this game will be a blow out by one team or the other.

by bannor d on Sep 7, 2010 10:54 PM CDT reply actions  

no blow out

I can also guarantee there won’t be nearly as much points scored. Its the 1st game of the year. Noone has played a live game in 4 months. This tends to benefit the defenses. I wouldn’t be surprised if we saw some sloppy ball out of the gates. Some special teams breakdowns might be the difference. I thought Reynaud could have made a difference but i guess not anymore =*(. Lots of false starts, offsides, and holding calls will make this another ref vs. Vikes and Saints game.

SKOL

by PurpleJesuZ on Sep 8, 2010 12:21 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Deathstarvikings_small
2012 Draft Player Rankings: Top 10 UPDATE 1.0
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 Mock Draft
Deathstarvikings_small
Stadium Politics and Economics
Jared-allen-minnesota-vikings__1__small
VCB: Skip Bayless Gets Owned By Chris Kluwe. Unknown If He Will French Kiss A Flamethrower.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Good News Everyone
Biggun_small
Vote:Patriots or Giants
Small
Feeling Lucky?
Morecowbell_small
Off Topic/ "Delocated" Edition
Small
FA WR for Vikings 2012
It-could-work_small
In 28 we trust, and it's staying that way
Mtdlogo_small
Twitter Mock Draft Results: TooEarlyMock
It-could-work_small
Sadly, the Manning debate likely a moot point
F6bd18c3d2372bdd64e1ee3fa5d35bf1_small
Super bowl shuffle, without all that Bear crap.
Small
Picture Perfect Pro Bowl Day

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Kira_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall