The "Blueprint" For Beating The Minnesota Vikings
After the Vikings fell to the Saints in last year's NFC Championship Game, the assertion was made from many different corners that the Saints had given the rest of the NFL the "blueprint" to beat the Minnesota Vikings. This assertion, quite frankly, is laughable at best. This "blueprint" was based largely around hitting Brett Favre. . .basically, that if you hit Brett Favre enough times, you could eventually beat the Minnesota Vikings.
Yeah. . .hitting the other team's quarterback is apparently a big secret in NFL circles. I mean, don't tell me that you're not as shocked as I am about this sort of thing.
Gregg Williams, the loud-mouthed defensive coordinator of the New Orleans Saints, has said that the Saints are going to take a similar approach in tomorrow night's ball game. Quite frankly, I hope that this is the case. Why? Because in the NFC Championship Game, the "blueprint" apparently consisted of two things:
1) Worrying significantly more about hitting Brett Favre than about allowing the Minnesota offense to march up and down the field at will
2) Crossing your fingers and hoping like hell that a team that only turned the ball over 18 times in their first 17 games of the season would manage to turn it over five times in one night
That would be a great blueprint for the Saints to follow tomorrow night, and one that I would definitely advise every team in the NFL to employ against the Vikings as the season progresses. To put this mildly, there is no way in hell that the Vikings turn the ball over five times tomorrow night. There's also a good likelihood that they will, once again, march up and down the field on the Saints' defense. The Saints will be without Darren Sharper, who will back up his off-season arrogance with a spot on the Saints' Physically Unable to Perform list, and they've also got issues at the linebacker positions, where Jonathan Vilma has a groin injury, and it's not yet known who will start at one of the LB spots after the Saints put starter Jonathan Casillas on injured reserve.
Backup linebackers, hobbled linebackers, and defensive tackles that are suspect at best against Adrian Peterson? Call me crazy, but I sort of like that match-up for the Vikings.
The Vikings need to combat the Saints' super-duper, uber-secret "hitting the quarterback" blueprint with another little-known NFL strategy. . ."holding on to the football." Quite simply, if the Vikings hold on to the football against the Saints and don't gift them five turnovers, they will win. It will also help if the Ronnie Milsap-led crew from the NFC Championship Game isn't officiating the festivities again this time around, but the turnover battle is the biggest part of things.
Hold on to the football. Win the game. It's that easy.
63 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yes well...
… it seems rather obvious. No one ever said Gregg Williams was a Cal Tech graduate.
I think that, with Sharper out and other defensive injuries, we should be able to move the ball on the Saints. Getting the running game going, and I like the idea of getting some screen passes going to neutralize the blitzing a bit.
The big question for me is “can our secondary hold up?” We need to put some of those big hits on Brees. I see a lot of 4 receiver sets for the Saints. We need big time pressure, better than we got in the NFC championship game.
Remember, even with all the turnovers last year, we still tied them in regulation, and our defense gave up only about 250 yards. With no EJ!
by HammeroftheGods on Sep 8, 2010 10:36 PM CDT reply actions
Maybe...
… but he was still a player last year. Now he’s out.
by HammeroftheGods on Sep 9, 2010 1:47 AM CDT up reply actions
A. D. R.I.A.N. P.E.T.E.R.S.O.N
Appears to be hungry. Lets feed him the ball and lets see our boys knock these guys flat on their A$$. You better believe it, drew brees, they will be coming for you and you will quickly forget where you are.
E.J. Henderson is my predicted MVP for the game. I think someone has some precense to be felt that didn’t get that opportunity the first time around. AHHHHEWWWWGA
SKOL
Well of course it'd be EJ
Hard to pick against a linebacker who can fly

"Baseball is the only major sport that appears backward in a mirror" ~George Carlin
by thewild_viking_twins on Sep 8, 2010 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions 4 recs
Man, do I ever love that picture
SBNation Minnesota - For the greatest sports fans in the world.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
by Christopher Gates on Sep 8, 2010 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions
Yeah, that's a rec
"Whoever said that the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons."
Yeah, 10 yards for Unnecessary Use of Superpowers
"Whoever said that the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons."
by Ted Glover on Sep 9, 2010 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
I can hear the ‘Six Million Dollar Man’ sound effects…
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 9, 2010 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions
The blue print to beating the Vikings is this
Be the Saints.
"Why do you even ponder passing? I mean, you can take a knee and try a 56 yard field goal! This is not Detroit man, this is the Superbowl!" -- Paul Allen's call after Tracy Porter intercepted Brett Favre in NFCCG
.

"Baseball is the only major sport that appears backward in a mirror" ~George Carlin
by thewild_viking_twins on Sep 8, 2010 10:44 PM CDT up reply actions
Yep
SBNation Minnesota - For the greatest sports fans in the world.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
by Christopher Gates on Sep 8, 2010 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Don't get me wrong
If the Saints want to go with the whole “we’re the Saints, so all we have to do is show up and toss our helmets on the field” approach, I’d more than welcome that as well. After all, a team can only have a horseshoe jammed in its collective ass for so long.
If the Saints approach this game with the same level of arrogance that most of their fans are approaching it with. . .Vikings by 30.
SBNation Minnesota - For the greatest sports fans in the world.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
by Christopher Gates on Sep 8, 2010 10:53 PM CDT up reply actions

"What is best in life?"
"To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women."
Your starting to worry me with these pictures
unless your 14.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
R u kidding me?
Kick-Ass is one of the most crazy movies I’ve ever seen.
It’s hilarious, awesome, and full of blood & gore.
If you have not seen it.. I reccommend that you do.
And yes, they’re creating a sequel!!!
I don't mind the movie
Albeit I didn’t see it however, I’m more worried that in the last month he’s made about 10 posts with a 12 year old purple haired girl in them…
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
but this girl...
KICKS ASS!
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 9, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions
LMAO
You need to watch the movie…
It’s like…
“Superbad” meets “Saw” meets “She’s out of my league”
Its funny
Its Gorey
And.. You got a nerdy kid who gets the girl at the end…
It’s a movie I could watch over n over…
I like the Bazooka part…. “Say hello to my little friend…!” Cue entrance of Superhero…. That’s the best part!!!
Personally my favorite movie of this genre
will have to be Zombie Land.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
HELL YEAH!
what a great movie!
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 9, 2010 3:09 PM CDT up reply actions
Zombie land was really good too.
This is good in the same way that it really rips it own genre while still being cool.
by CanadianViking on Sep 9, 2010 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions
It's called a theme.
I would have never even bothered to post a single one if not for the fact that she wears a purple wig. Not that it should be the concern of the “Grime Inquisition”, but my original intent was to use the one picture for my Avatar and change the refection on the knife to what ever quarterback we face that week. The rest were to be a theme for the week of the Saint’s game, but since the trolls came early, I started early. I’m not sure what your problem is with her age? I thought it was part of the joke. If you don’t get it, I’m sorry you don’t.
Do you and Gumby subconsciously find her poses arousing or something, because I didn’t even think of any sexual connotations until you brought them up.
After your Previous ludicrous accusations, I simply explained that there is a difference between a girl in a bathing suit and nude pictures and left it at that. Now you seem to be implying some far more sinister and I frankly find this extremely insulting. Do you subconsciously find her poses arousing or something, because I didn’t even think of any sexual connotations, until you brought them up.You seem to have some kind of bizarre obsession with sex and nudity, I have no idea what your problem is, but tossing around veiled suggestion’s with any foundation that people are pedophiles is what I find disturbing.
"What is best in life?"
"To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women."
Yeah, I know there's typos in that statement,so what.
"What is best in life?"
"To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women."
Good post
Look, they play the game so we don’t have to argue stuff on paper. But it’s absolutely true that we stopped that offense in the NFC championship. People look at the final result, a loss, and suddenly the Saints dominated the Vikings? Of course the Saints have a good team, and sure we might lose. But I like our chances if, as you say, we hold on to the ball. (Same frustration on blindness goes for the Packer bandwagon – do any of the pundits have any idea how the Pack is going to stop anyone from scoring this year? People are worried that we’re a little short in the secondary. The Packers are predicted by a majority of SI guys to win the Super Bowl and they have no secondary, and couldn’t stop anyone last year. The preseason didn’t suggest they’ve figured that out yet.)
Problem isn't your secondary
although I don’t have quite the same amount of faith in them as you do, plus Al Harris needs to prove he’s back at full health. I think your main problem is that your front seven don’t seem to get a lot of pressure on the QB. This allows good QB’s to sit patient and wait for something to open up down field.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Actually
Their problem is starting to be their secondary. There is NO way Woodson puts up those numbers again and both Woodson and Harris are getting pretty old for CBs.
plus Harris is injured.
Winfield came back and Harris can too, but it’s a tough road to hoe at their ages and I garuntee that’s the reason we have Cook with us now. I still say they need more pash rush, but that’s just me. Personally, I always wondered how their run D was so dominant.
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Don't forget ...
… that not only did we outplay them last year in the NFC championship loss, but the Saints lost at home to the Tampa Bay Bucs.
People not giving us a chance are kidding themselves. It’s not going to be an easy game, but it is hard to say which team will win when neither has played a regular season game yet.
I’m hoping the Vikings come out with energy and play like they are on a mission. I think they will. I think the Saints might be tight. We just need to go get them.
by HammeroftheGods on Sep 8, 2010 10:55 PM CDT reply actions
It IS going to be an easy game.
Vikes by 3 scores.
by Jepp The Viking on Sep 8, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions
I just wanted to say
Good luck tomorrow. Last year’s NFCCG was disgusting to watch, because the team that was so clearly superior ended up losing. It was blatantly obvious to me and everyone who was watching the game with me that the Vikings were the better team. I thought that the Saints were paper tigers and would get rolled by the Colts, but Indy was not the team I thought they were. You guys deserved to win the SB last year, and it was not fun seeing NO and their simpering media gaggle slobber over the Lombardi. Please do us all a favor and kick the snot out of them.
Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
-Napoleon Bonaparte
Stampede Blue's Resident Steelers Fan
Cornell University Class of 2014
by LV Steelers Fan on Sep 9, 2010 12:05 AM CDT reply actions
You, sir
Are a gentleman and a scholar, and are welcome back here any time. (-:
SBNation Minnesota - For the greatest sports fans in the world.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
by Christopher Gates on Sep 9, 2010 6:52 AM CDT up reply actions
I wish we could put this post on the front page,
the Saints posters almost had me believing that they actually were better, somehow.
I'll be honest...
The Saints won a game they should have lost, I accept that… but they still won the game after that. Everyone thought the Saints would get smashed by the Colts base on the outcome of the NFCCG but they soundly beat the Colts 31-17. So…. in all fairness… could it be that the SAINTS were not the team you thought they were, rather than the Colts?
I wouldn't say soundly
You guys got lucky on that Onsides kick. I’ll give you the Interception TD, but that Onsides was pure luck. I still think the Colts had possession, but its over. It was within reach for the Colts until that TD-return. Another case of the team beating itself, you could argue.
Part of my point was that it's an endless argument...
When does a team that loses not actually lose by beating itself? Where do you draw the line? Can you actually play mistake free football and still lose? What do we consider a mistake? How do you tell if it’s the defense that dominated or just the offense out of rhythm? How do you know if it’s the pitcher striking the batter out or the batter is just in a slump? How do you know if it was a great kick, or the goalie just misjudged the ball? How do you know if Brett Favre overthrew the ball or the receiver just didn’t run fast enough to catch it? Will a team EVER recover something like an onside kick because of skill?
Football is, after all, a wonderful way to get rid of your aggressions without going to jail for it. ~Heywood Hale Brown
I would love it if more teams followed the tAints plan.
Being allowed over 350 yards passing for Favre and 120 yards rushing for AP every week sounds pretty sweet.
Saints fans..
Tell your Saints to let us win..
Cuz if we lose! I will be killing puppies & kicking babies!
I only kid I only kid, I’m poking fun at a local radio station.
Yeah, the thing about their 'game-plan' is..
that it won’t work in the regular season. At all. In the Playoffs, you always run into less penalties, because refs are content to let the game play out. If they plan to try as many late hits this game as they did in that one, they may as well hand us the victory before we even take the field.
I fraking hate the Saints
The more this day goes on, the hotter my hatred becomes.
there’s gonna be some GROWLING cheering going on tonite!
I BELIEVE...
by ArizonaVikingsFan on Sep 9, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions
I tell you what....
No Saints fan that I talk to ever considered Greg Williams defense to be good. Opportunistic, maybe, but not by any means good. The Saints defense has been fairly useless since 2006. I’ll quote myself here: “Man, the Saints are scoring like 30 points/game. All they need is a slightly less worthless defense and we would be winning all these games.” That’s what Greg Williams brought us – a slightly less worthless defense. I mean, all they have to do it prevent the other team from scoring 30 points and even a worthless defense can do that. The defense is more or less the same only now but, unlike Gary Gibbs, G. Williams likes to bring a little heat. I see nothing wrong with that. If you’re gonna give up the same yardage anyway, you might as well try and bait the offense into making a few mistakes along the way. It’s a high risk, high reward kind of thing I guess. They still gave up the yardage by came away with nearly twice the number of turnovers as in 2008(22 vs 39). You also assume that the Saints offense will perform the same as it did in the NFCCG. Seriously…even professional athletes can have off days and that bug apparently bit us for that game. Yes, the Vikes had an unusual 5 turnovers, but the Saints only scoring 7 points from 5 TO’s is also quite unusual. Anyway, base on some of the comments I read in this thread, I guess wishing a great, injury free game for both teams would fall on deaf ears. Peace out.
Nah we all wish that
Very few actually want any kind of bad thing to happen. And the ones that do just havn’t seen enough bad things…
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Oh and good luck to you all as well
I hope you lose!
It's a lot easier to love the Vikings when they win...
Remember, this Saints team is essentially the same bunch
that was a 7 and 8 win team in 2007 and 2008. The main difference? Turnovers. Last year they were +11.
In 2007, they were -7. In 2008, they were -4. I can think of a couple games right off the top of my head (at St Louis, Washington, the Vikes) where they got a timely special teams play or a critical turnover. If I dug deeper, it would probably be more. The Saints are good, but they were also one of the luckiest teams I can remember.
They won’t be +11 in turnover margin again this year, and the Vikes won’t turn the ball over five times.
"Whoever said that the pen is mightier than the sword never encountered automatic weapons."
And we won 10 games in 2006
And won the division. Are you really going there? Several years back? Should we drag up some of your games last year? San Fran comes to mind since i was at that game.
As for the +11 turnover margin, probably not, with another year with GW it will likely be +15
Football is easy if you're crazy as hell
Nope.
What people don’t realize is that turnovers are almost all pure luck. You can’t say they’ll be better anymore than we can say they’ll be worse. The only thing is that turnovers tend to average out in the long run given its roughly 50/50 on scrambles for the ball.
by Jepp The Viking on Sep 9, 2010 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions
Nobody's saying the Vikes didn't have skin of the teeth victories
I can name you another. The Raven’s game. We should have lost that one.
But +15? Really? Can I ask why you expect such an increase, when your defense doesn’t appear to have improved?
turnovers are mostly luck...
I’ll agree with that for the most part, but it’s fairly easy to discern whether a turnover was ALL luck or at least some part defensive skill(i.e. the ball getting poked out by a helmet vs a player stripping the ball out). That being said, with more skill certainly comes more luck, yah?
What I don't like
Is when fans try to pull the ‘’yeah but it’s all coaching! Coach XYZ always has them do strip/fumble drills!" NO SHIT?!?! You tell me a d-coord that doesn’t insist on fumble/ball stripping and I’ll crap two Faberge eggs for you.
by Jepp The Viking on Sep 9, 2010 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions
I'll roll with that too...
Not completey sure how you teach a defensive player to strip the ball better than he was before. I suppose you can train them to increase awarness, swarm the ball carrier better and thus increase the chances of the ball coming loose.
Football is, after all, a wonderful way to get rid of your aggressions without going to jail for it. ~Heywood Hale Brown
Given the sad number of turnovers we create
I will go out on a limb and say that Leslie Frazier does not insist on fumble/ball stripping… but I really just want to see you crap those eggs.

by 

















