Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Who Gets This Week's Game Ball For The Minnesota Vikings?

Yes, another loss for the Vikings, but there were still some performances worthy of a Game Ball, and in determining who will get this week's nod, there will actually be a poll involved. Here are the candidates that I've come up with.

DE Jared Allen - Ho hum, another game, another pair of sacks for the National Football League's best pass rusher. In addition to that, he also had three other quarterback hits and three tackles for a loss. The next one of his detractors that spent this past off-season talking about how washed up he was that actually admits it will be the first.

WR Michael Jenkins - As I mentioned in the comments in the Game Thread, Matt Ryan's first NFL pass was a 60-yard touchdown pass to Michael Jenkins. Christian Ponder's first NFL pass should have been a 73-yard touchdown pass to Michael Jenkins. As it was, Jenkins wound up with 111 receiving yards on the game, the first 100-yard game of his career, and the first one posted by a Viking in. . .well, a really long time, I bet.

RB Adrian Peterson - Ho hum, another game, another 175 yards and over seven yards a carry for the National Football League's best running back. Honestly, are people still making arguments for running backs that are better than this guy? Do those people even watch football?

QB Christian Ponder - I'm going to have some more stuff on Ponder's performance tomorrow. Even though the numbers weren't eye-popping by normal standards or anything, for a guy making his first start in the situation that he was in, he played an impressive football game on Sunday.

Those are the picks, ladies and gentlemen. Have at it!

Poll
Who should be the recipient of this week's Game Ball for the Minnesota Vikings?
DE Jared Allen
94 votes
WR Michael Jenkins
38 votes
RB Adrian Peterson
338 votes
QB Christian Ponder
350 votes
Other (discuss in comments section)
2 votes

822 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Did you forget about Ponder's passes in the Chicago game?

:P

In all serious, though: good play calling on letting Ponder air it out on his first start.

by Purpledork on Oct 25, 2011 9:29 PM CDT reply actions  

What I liked about Ponder

Like you said, his numbers weren’t eye popping, but what I noticed was that he made the clutch throws, like on third down and in the red zone. I really like that, because as we all as Viking fans know, if there’s anything we’ve needed throughout franchise history, it’s someone who comes up big in key situations

Mikael Granlund: The Great Hope

by NorthernStar on Oct 25, 2011 10:28 PM CDT reply actions  

I feel Ponder actually helped Peterson's

performance in this particular game.

☠★☪Creator of http://skolnation.co.cc and dedicated DN reader.

by UnBannedVikingholic on Oct 26, 2011 12:46 AM CDT reply actions  

Gameball Ponder

☠★☪Creator of http://skolnation.co.cc and dedicated DN reader.

by UnBannedVikingholic on Oct 26, 2011 12:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree

The passing game really helped the running game and back and forth. As one does better the other will as well. The question is how well would Ponder do in the pocket if he had time.

Try to learn from others mistakes because there just is not enough time in this world to make them all your self

by montana vikes fan on Oct 26, 2011 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ponder enabled AP....

Having a QB that can convert clutch 3d down passes and starts the game by throwing a deep pass for almost (should have been?) a long touchdown makes the opposing D a little less sure what is going to develop, hence contributes to the success AP had I feel….

Can’t take away what AP did of course, just that the balance (run/pass threat) was returned somewhat in this game through Ponder, allowing us to lead/stay close throughout. Ponder showed me tremendous potential, no fear to throw down-field, scrambling ability, and best of all, heart/drive.

The rest of the season we are going to be able to give our younger/new guys some time playing to see where/who we focus our likely high picks in the draft….We all know we have glaring needs, but getting the current younger players time may bring out some stars, and we do not waste draft picks for unneeded players/positions…

I give Ponder the game ball, with a close second for both AP and JA….The spark we saw has been missing, and Ponder has brought this to the team once again…The swagger is back, with reason, albeit measured at this point (let’s use the rest of the year to develop the younger guys, get a W or three/more, and prepare for the future)…SKOL!

I would rather be IN the Arena than watching from the stands...That is my life!
* Read Teddy Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" if you need further explanation...

by vikingfanfrom afar on Oct 26, 2011 6:12 AM CDT reply actions  

Well Ponders accuracy in the second half was a bit rough

but the pocket was collapsing in a quick way in the second half as well. Things I picked up about him. He didn’t check down as often as I thought he would. Most of his passes were at least 10 yards, and he was very intelligent with his runs (except for diving head first YE GODS MAN!) I think if we can work a better check down system for him so he has a release valve if need be he’ll do better this week against Carolina. Problems with him, he made some scary throws and I thought we were lucky to come out of that game with only two int’s, his long balls were um, pretty darn high… In the end that’s going to get him picked and receivers clobbered. Lastly, to me at least he stared down a couple of his receivers, I know Frazier stated it’s nice that he makes up his mind and throws the ball, but just because he’s picked his target doesn’t mean he should be staring at him and telling the entire defense who to guard db’s like Woodson are going to eat him up if he keeps doing it.

AD was amazing some of the runs he pulled off Sunday were purely phenomenal, and if you counted all the side to side running he ended up doing I’m sure he would clear 200 yards.

Oh and we need to clone Allen.

Putting Ponder in isn't the question, it's the answer.

by Grime on Oct 26, 2011 7:55 AM CDT reply actions  

Ponder's head first dive

I’m fairly sure that no one ever even touched him when he did that dive. Technically isn’t the play still active till he gets touched? I know sliding feet first is declaring yourself down, but I was under the impression that head first you still have to be downed by the opposing team. I would’ve found it hilarious had he just gotten up and continued running!

by nectur on Oct 26, 2011 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

He was one of the Packers came by and slapped him on the shoulder

The thing is the guy didn’t need to do that he could have hit him without much issue. Ponder has already had one injury doing something a bit questionable, we can hope he learns this lesson without time out of the game. Although getting injured sure would make KcSkol and his merry band of Webb supporters happy!

P.S. Not saying KcSkol and the Webbites want Ponder to get injured.
P.P.S Just always wanted to use a post post script…

Putting Ponder in isn't the question, it's the answer.

by Grime on Oct 26, 2011 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I voted Jenkins

We needed a receiver to step up and he did … so I give him the Game Ball

"Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve."
George Bernard Shaw

"In those days the best painkiller was ice; it wasn't addictive and it was particularly effective if you poured some whiskey over it."
George Burns

by just another viking on Oct 26, 2011 8:08 AM CDT reply actions  

As many people that begged for 84 to come back

I really think hes making that number look good on the field again.

2011 Vikings, keeping the liquor industry in the green ALL YEAR LONG!

by LeeleeX on Oct 26, 2011 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Went with Ponder

He will have to do more next week to receive a vote from me. But the way that I see it…

Allen – Just another day at the office. If we give Allen the gameball everytime he recorded two sacks and was his normal disruptive self than we would have to rename the award the JA award.

Peterson – Didn’t eclipse 200 rushing yards, only one touchdown will save my vote for someone else this week.

Jenkins – First 100 receiving game from Jenkins added a TD reception as well. However he was tripped up a half yard shy of giving Ponder a TD pass on his first pass of the first game that he started.

Ponder – #’s were not pretty, however he moved the chains and made the game exciting. Plus his play inspired hope in me for the future. Have not been this excited for an upcoming game day since ’09 and this is soley due to Ponders performance.

by MNSportsGuy on Oct 26, 2011 10:24 AM CDT reply actions  

I had to go with Jared Allen

He WAS the defense on Sunday. I say the ball goes to him since he played that side of the ball alone. The linebackers didn’t do well, the secondary stunk, but Jared Allen played his butt off. I have to give it to him.

by B Rad on Oct 26, 2011 11:16 AM CDT reply actions  

This is one of the closest votes I've seen.

Was a toss-up between Ponder and A.D., but I went with Adrian (175 yds is nothing to sneeze at) and pulled him into the lead by one vote.

"I saw a wino eating grapes and I was like, dude, you have to wait!" - Mitch Hedberg

by abba7 on Oct 26, 2011 11:28 AM CDT reply actions  

Went with Ponder.

AP and Jared Allen were awesome, but the thing is that is to be expected. We can’t give them the game ball EVERY week, can we? (Well, we could.) Ponder on the other hand exceeded expectations, so I’m going that route. Jenkins could have been a close second because he also stepped up in a big way, but Ponder at the end of the day did juuuust a little more.

I'm at a loss for words. Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Oct 26, 2011 12:23 PM CDT reply actions  

Ponder was good but I think its just because your expectations for him were really tempered. He had the least impressive performance of all the guys up there. Not a rip, I thought he had a very nice game but I just don’t think he’s the top performer for you guys.

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Oct 26, 2011 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree, however I voted for Ponder since he exceeded expectations. Minus Jenkins we have seen AP and JA do this on a regular basis and it takes a little extra to get my game ball of the week vote. Ponder made the game enjoyable to watch even if we were unable to finish the comeback attempt. Performance alone with no expectations taken into consideration and I would have voted for Peterson.

by MNSportsGuy on Oct 26, 2011 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yep, that's kinda why I went with it.

The ‘exceeded expectations’ part. Is it necessarily fair to use that as a base judgement in life? No, but then again, it’s just the DN game ball… it’s not like Jared Allen or Adrian Peterson are getting docked paycuts for not getting the game ball. ;-)

I'm at a loss for words. Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Oct 26, 2011 7:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ponder was good

but the ball has to go to Peterson. 175 yards on all of 26 carries? He was the workhorse that made our offense go. Yes, Ponder had a good debut, but without Peterson, I can practically guarantee it would’ve been far worse. He was just a monster with the ball in his hands.

Wish we could’ve seen more of him on that last drive.

by REVENGE4KLUWE on Oct 26, 2011 1:06 PM CDT reply actions  

I think you have to go with AP…he was an animal and kept Ponder in situations where he could minimize mistakes. If there were a lot of 3rd and 15s or 3rd and 10s it would have allowed the Packers to pin their ears back even more and force errors. AP all the way in my book.

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Oct 26, 2011 1:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Ponder by a vote!

"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man." - Mark Twain

SKOL VIKINGS!

by Landonio on Oct 26, 2011 7:38 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
You Can Breathe Slightly Easier
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Secondary
Russian_arms_control_small
Season in Review: Chris Cook's Best and Worst performances in 2011
Biggun_small
1st New Vikes Stadium Image
Small
What got you hooked on the Daily Norseman?

Recent FanPosts

Biggun_small
SUCK IT MARTY! - Stadium Passes MPLS 7-6
Imagescaj02y87_small
We get NO RESPECT!
Small
Supplemental Draft and our Safety Situation
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Receivers and Tight ends
Grover_small
Purple Kool Aid - Oh Ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Photo_10_small
Percy Harvin and the 2012-13 Passing Game
Small
Jarred Allan VS DeMarcus Ware
It-could-work_small
Wait.....What? The MN Supreme Court Has To OK The Stadium?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Minnesota-vikings-logo_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall