Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Jared Allen Makes Peter King's Midseason All-Pro Team; Adrian Peterson Doesn't?!

They should probably just rename the "strip/sack" the "Jared Allen".

Before I start, please keep commenting on Ted's stadium story and sharing your opinions on the matter. The legislators are really hosing this one up, and the possibility of our favorite team leaving its home state just took a big ugly leap forward. But since all the stadium talk simply gets too depressing for me after a while, I thought I'd provide a temporary distraction with actual football news.

Peter King just released his Midseason All-Pro Team and I'm happy to report that the Minnesota Vikings are represented among the players that King considers the very best in the league at their position. Jared Allen was pretty much a no-brainer selection since he leads the league with a whopping 12.5 sacks through only half a season. He has wreaked havoc on quarterbacks all year and was a big part of the Vikings' victory over the Panthers on Sunday.

While it's nice to see Allen get the credit he deserves, another Viking is curiously missing from King's squad. Adrian Peterson was passed over in favor of Matt Forte as King's All-Pro running back.

To be clear, AP's snub is not as egregious as it seems to be at first glance. The All-Pro team is much more exclusive than something like the Pro Bowl rosters. King chooses the best from the entire NFL, not just the best from each conference. He also picks three wide receivers and only one running back because he feels (correctly in my opinion) that those numbers more accurately depict how an actual NFL team lines up these days.

The fact that he chose Forte is certainly defensible to a degree--just take a look at his stats so far this year compared to AP:

2011 Stats
G Att Yds Avg TD Rec Yds Avg TD
Adrian Peterson 8 167 798 4.8 9 16 125 7.8 1
Matt Forte 7 124 672 5.4 2 38 419 11.0 1

While Peterson has found the end zone seven more times, Forte's receiving numbers are much better and he's getting more yards per touch. As King's article points out, Forte is on pace for more yards from scrimmage than Marshall Faulk and LaDainian Tomlinson had during any single season in their primes.

But that doesn't mean I have to agree with King's pick. For my money, AP is still a cut above every other running back in the NFL and it's not really that close. Forte definitely is a bigger threat catching the ball right now, but the Carolina game (5 receptions for 76 yards) showed that Peterson will get more involved as a receiver as he and Christian Ponder become more comfortable with each other.

What do you think? Did Peter King get it right or should AP stand for (Midseason) All-Pro? Let us know in the poll and in the comments.

Poll
Are you OK with Peter King leaving Adrian Peterson off his Midseason All-Pro Team?
Yes - Forte is having a better year so far and deserves the honor
134 votes
No - Adrian Peterson got snubbed
671 votes

805 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Hard to say

Forte has accounted for something like 1/3 of the Bears’ total yards, which is ridiculous. His TD numbers are actually quite surprisingly low, but it’s hard to argue with the yards he’s racking up.

That said, Forte has never faced the kind of single-minded focus from opposition that Peterson has faced every week for the last 4 years. When Forte puts up those numbers against 9 man fronts, I’ll be impressed.

by Cobra312004 on Nov 2, 2011 2:31 PM CDT reply actions  

Certainly Forte hasn’t had as much focus over the past four years, but I don’t think you can argue that defenses aren’t keying on him this year. The Bears’ receivers might be even worse than the Vikings’.

by Birdman84 on Nov 2, 2011 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Who would I rather have on my team?

Adrian Peterson.

Who is a better running back? Adrian Peterson.

Who’s having a better year so far? I think Matt Forte.

If RBs get fairly or unfairly credited with the play of their line, we could at least be consistent about it. Chicago’s O Line is the leakiest in the NFL and I don’t like it’s run-blocking either. Good on Forte for proving he deserves a contract in an offense that originally didn’t care about running backs.

by Arif Hasan on Nov 2, 2011 2:34 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

And one more thing...

Why is Darelle Revis the DPOY over Allen?

by Cobra312004 on Nov 2, 2011 2:35 PM CDT reply actions  

QBs have a 2.9 rating throwing against him

He has only allowed 10 completions, has 4 interceptions and when QBs do make the mistake of targeting his coverage, they are successful 30% of the time.

Even when they catch, it’s not wonderful. League average is 14 yards a catch, but he only allows 12. It’s rare you find a CB that can grab interceptions but also limit the receiver once the catch has been made.

Allen’s having a career year, but Revis is having an epic one. Any other year, Allen would be a shoe-in. Sigh.

by Arif Hasan on Nov 2, 2011 2:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Last I checked...

Yards don’t show up on the scoreboard.

by Bjorno on Nov 2, 2011 2:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Nothing against Forte but it's Peter King. The guy is wrong alot.

He’s a so called insider but his predictions & his analysis aren’t any better than your average fan.

by iowaron on Nov 2, 2011 2:45 PM CDT reply actions  

I'll give you that

I might just start out with the assumption that he’s wrong.

by Arif Hasan on Nov 2, 2011 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Funny

Both of your statements could apply to my NFL picks this year. Sigh.

by Eric J. Thompson on Nov 2, 2011 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

i'd take my boy Freddie Jackson over Forte...

FJax Stats:

Rush — 132att for 721yds (5.5avg) and 6TDs
Rec — 27att for 353yds (13.1avg)

only 17 fewer yds from scrimmage, so King’s argument likely also applies to Freddie. plus, b/c of Freddie’s play, Buffalo has a better record than Chicago, and he outperforms Forte in nearly every category.

King’s a mook.

"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."

Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.

by rj-b on Nov 2, 2011 2:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Excellent point

Jackson has been a beast this year—I’d take him over Forte.

by Eric J. Thompson on Nov 2, 2011 2:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't read the article...

so I don’t know what King is looking at for his picks, but I do know this…

If I’m lined up at the goal line for a critical 4th and 1 there is no one in the league I would rather hand off to than Adrian Peterson

by Rycraft on Nov 2, 2011 3:13 PM CDT reply actions  

Wait, not Toby?

Huh. Maybe you could tell Musgrave/Frazier??

by amiller92 on Nov 2, 2011 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

LOL

Yes Toby is the only player that can possibly get the ball over AP.

by MarkSP18 on Nov 2, 2011 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

*slaps forhead*

I’m glad I was not able to watch the rest of that game. I’d probably be in the market for a new TV.

by Rycraft on Nov 2, 2011 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hahahaha...

Your fantasy football expert since Jerry Rice's rookie year.

by Odin on Nov 2, 2011 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

This just in

Jared Allen has been named Defensive Player of the Month for October. All-Pro status solidified!

by Eric J. Thompson on Nov 2, 2011 3:36 PM CDT reply actions  

Who cares really?

The Vikings are stinking it up and the bonehead politicians are playing their game where they are putting the onus on Wilf to move instead of them coming up with a solution.

We all know AP is the best back. No question.

But since we are 2-6, I do no think any player deserves any honor. if I got one on a losing team I would turn it down.

And knowing these boneheads they will probably NOT draft an offensive lineman until the 4th round or later next year.

I just hope the current line can protect Ponder a little better so they do not get him hurt.

by MarkSP18 on Nov 2, 2011 3:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Vikings may be "stinking it up"

but they are, by far, the best 2 and 6 team in the league. with the exception of da bears game, the Vikings were in a position to win down to the last couple of minutes in every game. We all know they are better than their record. They’ve just had more yin than yang this year. (thanks you McYin)

With Ponder the full potential will be realized.

It could be worse. We could be the Broncos

Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted. - John Lennon

by JethroBoViking on Nov 2, 2011 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Or the Rams, Dolphins, or Colts.

by DonBorvio on Nov 2, 2011 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'd be interested to see the numbers

How many 8 or even 9 man fronts has Forte seen compared to AD?

How many designed screen plays compared to Peterson?

Peterson can ball, whether taking it directly from the QB or having it thrown to him. Does he have the same type of hands as LT? Maybe not right now but he can still catch and run pretty well.

Also, I’d be interesting to see the yards after contact for each one. I bet that AD blows Forte away.

I compare it similar when people compare Barry Sanders and Emmitt Smith. Smith was a good running back but he also had a passing game. Defenses could focus on him because of the Playmaker and Aikman. Barry was the Lions with the exception of two good years by Herman Moore. Barry didn’t catch a lot of passes either but that’s because when defenses would see him coming out of the backfield on passing down, they had a pretty good idea he might get the ball and covered him with someone, not just zone coverage by an LB. I think AD gets the same treatment, right now, as Barry did.

Now once Ponder gets these WRs going, heh heh…..

by AlldayFurore on Nov 2, 2011 4:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Yards After Contact

AP is 5th in the league with 3.2. 2nd in the league for HBs with over 100 attempts.

Forte is 18th, with 2.8. He’s 9th among HBs with over 100 attempts.

I’m trying to figure out if anyone is keeping track of attempts with 8 men in the box.

by Arif Hasan on Nov 2, 2011 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tom Pelissero

He evaluates the Vikings tape each Tuesday and posts an article on 1500espn.com and breaks down how many times AD faces 8 mean. It’s something crazy like 60-70% of the time.

I’m not sure if the Bears have a writer that does the same.

by AlldayFurore on Nov 2, 2011 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

That was dumb of me

I read his articles after every game. It should have clicked.

THANK YOU for that. It’ll help with my RB article, at least. If not this particular comparison.

by Arif Hasan on Nov 2, 2011 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Since we're on the subject of meaningless midseason awards....

Did anyone catch ESPN voters giving DPOY to Suh instead of Allen? I’m not even sure Allen was 2nd or 3rd. Suh has 3 sacks this season. I watched that stupid ass show just for the satisfaction of seeing JA get a little recognition during a terrible season, instead it’s like someone spray-sharted in my mouth. Fuck you, ESPN and all your ignorant fans who voted.

J.P. Bedor, Editor in Chief of Odin's Eye
www.eye-of-odin.blogspot.com

by randymoss on Nov 2, 2011 4:10 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Peterson is obviously better than Forte

I’d rather have the guy that’s putting points on the board, 3 tds this year with all them yards… C’mon man!

by Lunchpail on Nov 2, 2011 4:13 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

Maybe it's an expectations thing

You know, sort of how AP doesn’t get the DN gameball after 175 yds rushing. ;)

by archie2227 on Nov 2, 2011 4:44 PM CDT reply actions  

Plus 2 TDs

One Receiving and one rushing, while in pure beast mode.

by AlldayFurore on Nov 2, 2011 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Mine was 2 weeks ago

but this week’s voting works as well.

by archie2227 on Nov 2, 2011 6:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

AD's a better back and produces more TDs but I can see King's point with Forte being responsible for almost 50% of the Bears offense.

To be honest there’s four backs that are deserving of the all-pro honor right now.

Adrian Peterson-798 yards rushing with 9 TDs, 16 receptions for 125 yards and 1 TD.
Matt Forte-672 yards rushing with 2 TDs, 38 receptions for 419 yards and 1 TD.
Lesean McCoy-754 yards rushing with 8 TDs, 23 receptions for 138 yards and 2 TDs.
Fred Jackson- 721 yards rushing with 6 TDs, 27 receptions for 353 yards.

I’d give it to AD because of the extra TD production but it’s pretty close.

by CanadianViking on Nov 2, 2011 5:48 PM CDT reply actions  

why is forte such a big deal

I dont get how forte gets so much attention, when the vikings pass yards (1458) + Rushing Yards (1203)= 2661
ADrian peterson, Rush yards (798) + pass yards (125)= 923…. 923/2661= 34.6 percent of the offensive yards…

Now touchdowns, Mcnabb (4) (24pts) + Ponder (3) (18 pts) + Percy Harvin (1 kick return)(6 pts) + Ryan longwell (13 FG + 16 PAT) (55) + Adrian peterson (8) (48 pts)= 151 points, and adrian peterson with his 8 touchdowns not including his recieving touchdown accounts for 31%

The second statistic about accounting for one third of the vikings scoring, is something that forte cant say he does for the bears, and adrian peterson has to deal with the extra defenders in the box. So what kind of sense does that make, to put forte on there over peterson

by Pmartin60 on Nov 3, 2011 8:05 AM CDT reply actions  

It doesn't honestly Forte is getting the press because he's in a contract year

and playing better than he has since his rookie year. Honestly Jackson is receiving the same about running the same amount and has more TD’s.

Putting Ponder in isn't the question, it's the answer.

by Grime on Nov 3, 2011 8:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think it's fair from a certain perspective, but still...

Not sure how I feel about it. The thing about running backs is that there are so many ways to look at them, so many things that they are asked to do, and so many different things you might want/ expect out of them. A WR is a bit easier to judge- are they fast? Do they have good hands? Solid routes, good seperation? WR’s jobs are fairly straightforward- they’re expected to catch. Harvin aside, they’re typically not called upon to do a lot of running, and they’re usually not asked to do a ton of blocking, either (Harvin again aside, and Jenkins as well).

RBs on the other hand are expected to run, block, and catch. How much you want out of each department in a RB varies tremendously. AP’s not known as a great receiver- but that’s because he’s such a great pure runner, I don’t think our offense has asked him to do a lot of catching. (The Carolina game may either have been an aberation, or a sign of things to come.) And he’s also not asked to do a ton of blocking- although he’s very good at that, extremely underrated IMO (if you recall, in the Tampa game he absolutely stuffed Ronde Barber, the best blizting CB in the game). And of course, he’s not asked to do a ton because again a.) his real value is in the running, and b.) since he’s a physical, ‘wear down the defense’ kind of back, you don’t want to wear him out with too many blocking assignments, either.

But I think considering the reasons he’s not asked to catch a lot or block a lot is because he’s so great as a runner speaks volumes. Quite often the league nowadays treats RBs almost as second string to WRs. Lots of teams don’t even have a strongly defined #1 RB- they prefer to ‘run by committee’. And many teams don’t draft RB so that they can change the game- a lot of great runners out there today simply stepped up when they were given an opportunity, and proved themselves beyond the team’s expectations. (Arian Foster is an excellent example of this.)

The fact that Peterson was drafted to change the game, and STILL exceeded expectations, says a lot to me. It’s almost like he’s the last of a dying breed- the true running RB. So I think at the end of the day, while we can look at stats and point at them to find guys who are having a better year in a certain department than AP, or have a better game, or whatever, we should still focus on the fact that he is exactly what he’s supposed to be- the best runner in the NFL, bar none. His consistency and amount of talent in that area is mind-boggling. Forte, as PackApologist pointed out above, may give DCs more of a headache figuring out what he’s going to do… but AP still gives headaches even though DCs DO know what he’s going to do. Honestly, the fact that teams know to stack the box against him and yet he’s still got more yards on the ground than Forte, I think, proves that AP is still the best choice for RB.

And seriously… what other RB in the NFL genuinely makes DBs crap their pants by charging straight at them? You KNOW they all fear the imminent posterization.

I'm at a loss for words.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Nov 3, 2011 12:32 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

True

AP has had 33.5% of his attempts against stacked boxes, which is far and away the most of any other RB in the league. It’s partially because he’s a pure runner. Take a look at the top 4 RBs in the league (in my opinion) – LeSean McCoy, Fred Jackson, Adrian Peterson, and Matt Forte. They perform 4 different functions for 4 different offenses.

McCoy is not a blocker, and he doesn’t need to be. Their offensive line opens up big holes to give Mike Vick the option, although he’s generally not taking it. Defenses are generally blitzing from the outside, which would make blocking difficult anyway for an RB – McCoy will go down the field and perform a checkdown function to cheat the LBs in and allow the big-play offense to make the big plays. McCoy likes running up the left tackle. He doesn’t get too many targets, and they are usually behind the line of scrimmage in the middle of the field.

Forte is dynamic. He’s less of a blocker as well, but he’ll make all of his runs go to the outside, using his speed and blocking receivers to do some work. He also has more passing targets than any Bears receiver. He’s great for yards after the catch and will catch short passes over the middle (ahead of the LOS) and run them up. He fits Martz’s pass-happy offense by forcing defenses to acocunt for much more unconventional pass routes. These are usually for medium yards in the air, and can’t easily be characterized as dinks or dunks.

Fred Jackson is asked to block a lot, and that makes sense – the Bills run a college-style spread offense, and in today’s NFL that means you need another body to be ready to block. It makes pass blocking absurdly difficult, but run blocking a bit easier. That’s why Jackson has more runs up the middle than any other elite back right now. He also catches a lot of passes over the middle, but it’s less designed – more to relieve pressure from the pass rush than a designed play. He’s less of a power back, but he’s still very strong. Fitzpatrick will also use his experience presnap to help make decisions. Fred Jackson doesn’t carry the offense, but he enables it.

And AP is a powerful, quick-burst rusher that is hard to tackle. Very few DBs will take him down on the first hit and the matchups that defenses relish involve their star MLB or ILB and less likely involve a good tackling corner. Players are taught to ankle tackle him, which gives him an extra yard or two, but enables the stop. He carries the offense and enables the pass game by forcing an extra safety down. He can catch, but is generally not asked to because his touches are better as runs than passes. Peterson is better at making tacklers miss than Jackson and Forte and does it differently than McCoy. McCoy identifies good running lanes and Peterson will create them. Peterson’s cuts would risk the ankles of an untrained runner, and neither McCoy and Peterson perform the jump cuts made famous by Sanders, but McCoy will flow a little bit while Peterson will bounce out. AP will occasionally be asked to block, more than Forte and McCoy for sure, and he’s doing a pretty good job of it as his years progress.

by Arif Hasan on Nov 3, 2011 11:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Uh....

Matt Forte stats vs Packers: 9 rush attempts, 2 yards. Let me repeat: TWO FREAKING YARDS. Adrian Peterson, IMO.

Jay Cutler, first NFL quarterback to beat a playoff team with a losing record.

by arodgb on Nov 3, 2011 6:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
You Can Breathe Slightly Easier
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Secondary
Russian_arms_control_small
Season in Review: Chris Cook's Best and Worst performances in 2011
Biggun_small
1st New Vikes Stadium Image
Small
What got you hooked on the Daily Norseman?

Recent FanPosts

Biggun_small
SUCK IT MARTY! - Stadium Passes MPLS 7-6
Imagescaj02y87_small
We get NO RESPECT!
Small
Supplemental Draft and our Safety Situation
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Receivers and Tight ends
Grover_small
Purple Kool Aid - Oh Ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Photo_10_small
Percy Harvin and the 2012-13 Passing Game
Small
Jarred Allan VS DeMarcus Ware
It-could-work_small
Wait.....What? The MN Supreme Court Has To OK The Stadium?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Minnesota-vikings-logo_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall