Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

It's Time To See What We Have For Next Season

It's time to re-tool the roster and point towards the future.

Back in the day when I was a helicopter pilot in the Army and Air Force (Oh boy, here we go) we had two cardinal rules concerning weather:

1)  Never fly into a thunderstorm.  Only bad things can happen.

2)  If you violate rule number 1, you're an idiot.  Be that as it may, never turn around once in it.  Just fly straight and get out of it as soon as you can.

If you live, you come out on the other side to rainbows and sunshine.  Or a monochromatic green landscape if you're flying with night vision goggles.  And unicorns.  And poopy pants.  And hysterical laughter that you actually lived.  I got into some bad weather once while flying a mission with NVG's, and it was quite the memorable experience.  Came up out of nowhere, and before I knew it, I was a bona fide idiot. 

The Vikings have flown right into a thunderstorm, and the only way out is to fly right through it.  One of the things that will help them get to the rainbows and unicorns on the other side is talent, and the only way to figure out what kind of talent they have behind the veterans that might not be back next year is to start playing the reserves.

So, after the jump, let's look at some starting lineups I'd like to see moving forward for the rest of the season.

Star-divide

For the backfield, if Adrian Peterson is healthy, obviously he plays.  He takes the most pressure off of Christian Ponder and the passing game, so that's a no brainer.  Speaking of Ponder, duh, he plays.  It was the right call going with him, and we're going to have to live with the trials and tribulations of a rookie starting in the NFL.  It will pay dividends in the long run.

Now, let's talk receivers.  Percy Harvin, no brainer.  After Harvin, Michael Jenkins has been okay, but we know we have a decent to good player in him.  Devin Aromashodu has been inconsistent, but seems to have some big play ability, but what do we know about Stephen Burton?  That's right, virtually nothing.  Get him in the mix.  Put him and Aromashodu on the field at the same time, see what we have.

At tight end, start Rudolph.  No disrespect to Visanthe Shiancoe, but I doubt he'll be here next year.  Make Rudolph the starter and don't look back.

Now, the toxic waste dump that is the offensive line.  Unless it would mean the on field death of a member of the backfield, let's start making some changes.  Start Patrick Brown over Charlie Johnson.  Johnson has been a gamer, but he's just not any good.  Steve Hutchinson is getting by on reputation at this point, but he's still the best option at LG.  John Sullivan has been okay at center, and I think Joe Berger has been okay at RG, but he might give Sullivan a run for his money.  If you move Berger to C, throw Fusco in at RG--I thought he's played well in what limited action I can remember.  At RT, start DeMarcus Love.  Or start him at LT and flop Brown over to the right.  So, your new offense:

QB:  Ponder

RB:  AP

TE:  Rudolph/The People's Champion

WR:  Harvin/Aromashodu/Burton

LT:  Brown/Love

LG:  Hutch

C:  Berger

RG:  Fusco

RT:  Love/Brown

What, like it couldn't be any worse than we've been watching? 

On defense, it's time to end the Remi Ayodele era, and I think the Vikings have pretty much done that.  He was listed as a starter yesterday, but it seemed to me that Christian Ballard was on the field more than Ayodele was.  Maybe it was a situational thing, maybe not.  So I roll with Kevin Williams and Ballard at tackle, with Letroy Guion and Fred Evans rotating in.  At end, has anyone seen Brian Robison in the last four or five games?  I know he recovered a fumble yesterday, but after a strong start, what's happened?  I'm almost ready to see what Everson Griffen can do as a starter...but I think I might like him better at linebacker. 

Speaking of linebacker, I thought Kenny Onatolu did okay yesterday, but I like Erin Henderson.  With Jaspar Brinkley going on IR at the beginning of the season, there's really not a lot of wiggle room, and as inconsistent as Chad Greenway has been in pass coverage, he's a good tackler and better than Larry Dean.  But how about putting Griffen at LB, in place of Erin Henderson?  He's fast enough to be a gunner on special teams, and he's a solid tackler.  Line him up on the outside, and let him cover the TE and RB's coming out of the backfield--it seems that he has the size and speed to do so.  I love E.J. Henderson, love him.  The guy is just a sports warrior, and the fact that he came back from that broken leg speaks volumes about his heart and his will.  But...E.J has lost a step, and has been dogged by a knee injury all year.  I don't know if he is in the plans for the VIkings next year, and if he does leave the only MLB on the roster is Jasper Brinkley, who's on IR.  Is it worth mixing in Erin Henderson and/or Onatolu in the middle to see if they might make a decent backup?  It's right about now I'm really wishing the VIkings hadn't cut Ross Homan.

Oh, Vikings secondary, how you vex me.  With Antoine Winfield done for the year, it's time to full on rebuild.  Get rid of Asher Allen, or at least demote him as a starter.  Replace him with Marcus Sherels, and replace Cedric Griffin with Benny Sapp.  Move Allen back to the dime, and give the other Burton, Brandon, a shot at nickel back.  If he's as bad as Allen, really, what have we lost?  That's right, nothing.

For safeties, take Cedric Griffin and move him to free safety.  He just struggles in man on man coverage, but he might be decent to good in over the top cover-2 support and run support.  For strong safety, all things considered, Jamarca Sanford has been serviceable.  But I wouldn't mind seeing more Mistral Raymond there as opposed to FS.  So, our new defense:

RE:  Jared Allen

DT:  Christian Ballard

DT:  Kevin WIlliams

DE:  Brian Robison

OLB:  Chad Greenway

MLB:  EJ, with healthy doses of Onatolu and Erin Henderson

OLB:  Everson Griffen

CB:  Marcus Sherels

CB:  Benny Sapp

FS:  Cedric Griffin

SS:  Jamarca Sanford

This is not meant to be a cure all, and a magical elixir to 8-8.  You know that's probably not going to happen, and I know that, too.  But the Vikings have an opportunity to start some advanced roster scouting now, let these guys 'put it on tape', as they say, and get a good idea of what some of these deep roster guys might be able to do or not do.

Hopefully, it will make the rebuilding process faster, and will go a long way in determining who the Vikings need to target in free agaency and the draft.  There are about a dozen different directions and strategies they could employ, because team needs cut across both sides of the ball at almost every position.

Heck, at this point I wouldn't even be opposed to bring up some guys from the practice squad to see what they could do.

Comment 81 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Brian Robison

On the stat sheet, he had 2 tackles and a sack, which is probably better than Jared Allen yesterday (3 tackles). I was only able to watch the 4th quarter, last week so I have no idea if he passes the eye test or not. Robison has been quiet the past few weeks, but he had a good game yesterday from what I can tell.

SKOL Vikings!

by CCNorsemen on Nov 21, 2011 1:46 PM CST reply actions  

You can give Allen credit for that

If you think Kevin Williams and Robison having strong games have nothing to do with the crazy attention Jared Allen was getting yesterday, you weren’t paying attention. If they want to focus that much on Allen and free up things for everyone else, that works for me. I don’t think Jared would really complain either.

I have always questioned Robison’s ability to hold up as an every down end for an entire season (and I seem to be getting proven right). I’d like to see what Griffen can do over there too. LB is fun if we can’t get him on the field any other way, but let him do what he does best and get after the QB for a few games.

by Cobra312004 on Nov 21, 2011 5:21 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with everything you said Cobra - great observation.

Oakland game-planned so much against Jared they didn’t really take advantage of our horrendous secondary. I was worried how we’d contain their excellent WRs. To hold them to 166 yards passing wasn’t due to our secondary.

by Caretaker QB on Nov 21, 2011 8:21 PM CST up reply actions  

Excited to see no quitting yesterday.

Sure it was a cow pie of a game overall but to see Ponder bounce back time and again was heartening and the defense did adjust a bit to make stops when it mattered at the end. BUT I’m with you though, roll on next year…. next man in and see what we need for the draft which, alas, will be a high one for the Vikes.

by RustyViking on Nov 21, 2011 1:57 PM CST reply actions  

I wouldn’t mind freeing Everson Griffin more.

He’s versatile enough to even offer them the option of mixing up their front and showing a stand-up edge pass rusher now and then. Shocking! Given opponents with competent passing attacks don’t seem to fear 3rd-and-longs against this defense at all, maybe it would at least give them something to do a double-take on…

by jianfu on Nov 21, 2011 2:04 PM CST reply actions  

Not sure about this whole premise

In that I’m not sure that there’s much good in replacing your starters with guys who are behind them on the depth chart. But I’m all for “mixing in” and seeing what everyone on the roster can do in a real game situation.

by amiller92 on Nov 21, 2011 2:14 PM CST reply actions  

Asher Allen is not a starter.

He’s only playing cause the people in front of him are gone.

"Winning isn't everything but losing is nothing" - Ace Bricka coach of the Galaxy Aces

by FFXVIKE on Nov 21, 2011 2:16 PM CST reply actions  

yo

He’s starting so ultimately he’s a starter, going forward.
Either way, he EFFN SUCKS!! X10

SKOL! Dawgs

by WarriorViking on Nov 21, 2011 7:36 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm still a little mixed about Asher

He’s played really really bad at time, but the past few games he hasn’t looked so bad, IMO. Sure, I’ve seen some catches in front or behind him, but some of those have been into good coverage on his part. I think its safe to say that he’s never going to be a legit starter in this league, but I think he can be servicable in nickel. The starting CB and S positions need MUCH more work. If those issues get solved, he could play well. The problem with our secondary is that as a whole, it’s a dumpster fire. Hard to place blame in that scenario.

White Horn Gold Pants

by DM_Purp on Nov 21, 2011 8:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Griffen to FS

Love the idea. He wouldn’t be asked to have quite as big a role in coverage and he would be able to help in run support. I’ve actually Bren in favor of this since he was drafted. Would love to see the Vikes give it a shot.

by RMDuke on Nov 21, 2011 2:18 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Winfield to SS?

If Winfield is brought back next year, I would like the Vikes to give it a shot. I doubt this happens being as Winfield is 35 and it’s probably too late to convert him but I think SS would suit his skill set best.

by RMDuke on Nov 21, 2011 2:22 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Winfield would make...

…. a great SS. He can certainly cover when needed, hits hard enough to stop runners, and he can certainly blitz as he showed in Philadelphia last season. But unless we get some additional CB’s before next season, we’ll need him at CB…. if they bring him back.

by Vrooman on Nov 21, 2011 2:47 PM CST up reply actions  

I think Winfield would be too old and too small to hold up to all the hitting at SS.

"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin

by kcskol on Nov 21, 2011 4:53 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree.

It pains me to say this, but we need to release him. We need the salary cap relief to sign a young free agent that can help us for years to come. Winfield is only a temporary band-aid who no longer brings real starter value to the table.

Your fantasy football expert since Jerry Rice's rookie year.

by Odin on Nov 21, 2011 5:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Ha!

Initially I thought you were out of your friggin mind… Everson Griffen at FS?!?!

Yeah I know I know, still, the image was amusing.

by Jshore on Nov 21, 2011 2:57 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Okay what's with

all the No WInfield next year talk? He’s still under contract, so why wouldn’t he be back next year?

by PurpleEaters on Nov 21, 2011 2:30 PM CST reply actions  

Salary vs. age and recent injury history

Or, what we call it, ‘the business side of the NFL’.

I think Winfield is due over $7 million next year, and I don’t see the Vikes paying him that much. Maybe they will, but I’d expect them to ask him to take a paycut if he wants to stay with the team.

I hope that doesn’t happen, but that’s just my gut feeling.

Some people just need a high five. In the face. With a chair.

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire

by Ted Glover on Nov 21, 2011 2:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Winfield

Ted hit it spot on. It’s not that we don’t love us some Winfield but at what cost?

by RMDuke on Nov 21, 2011 2:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Dont forget that the team still is required to spend 89% of the cap in cash starting in 2013

Here is what I found …

http://www.askthecommish.com/salarycap/faq.asp

Under the new CBA, The cap for 2011 is $120.375M per team. Each team must average $119.2 M. That is a league-wide average not an individual team minimum. League-wide, teams must spend 99% of the cap in 2011 and 2012. In 2013 and beyond, they must spend 95% of the cap. In the event that player costs are less than this overall league minimum, then, on or before April 15 of the next League Year, the NFL shall pay an amount equal to such deficiency directly to the players.

In terms of minimum salary for each team, the salary floor is 89% of the cap. However, that does not start until 2013. Hence, there is in essence no salary floor in 2011 or 2012. (Note this point, as there is plenty of misinformation about this running rampant in the press!)

So while I would like to release Hutchinson, Winfield, Griffin, and some others, the team will need to be 89% of the cap starting in 2013 which is 107 mil. They are going to have to give that money to someone.

Free agents are the answer of course because the youngsters on the team are not due an increase and may not be worth it (sans Percy of course).

by MarkSP18 on Nov 21, 2011 3:13 PM CST up reply actions  

That's why some of that cash should go to vets like Shank

He’s still productive and a vital part of the 2 TE offense.

"God always comes first, then grades, (and lastly) football." 11-year old phenom Demias Jimerson on his reaction to being told that he cannot score more than 2 TD's per game in his Arkansas Pee-Wee football league.

by NMVike on Nov 21, 2011 4:02 PM CST up reply actions  

perhaps some of that cash

could go to some free agents to do a better job than what we have now.

by Chris3 on Nov 21, 2011 4:25 PM CST up reply actions  

The devil is in the details

The catch to that is typically teams need to spend that salary floor by the end of the season and not the beginning. That means that spending the money can wait a bit and be used on extending players currently on the roster in need of contract extensions and front load the contract into the current salary year.

So for example, if a guy like Guion or Sullivan is having a break out season in a contract year the Vikings can give him a contract extension to secure the player for the long term. The team can also front load the new deal into the current year, eating up salary cap that is currently being unused in order to get them to the floor while rewarding the player for the production he has had in the year. Finally by front loading the contract the team can reduce the cap hit that will be had in later years allowing the team more cap flexibility to happen later.

I’m not sure who on the Vikings will be entering into a contract year next year and who the Vikes might be looking to extend, but it’s something to keep in mind if the team is looking to clear out some old salary but need to spend. It’s not always wise to spend all the way to cap at the beginning of the year, especially if you are trying to turn over the roster.

by PackApologist on Nov 21, 2011 11:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Winfield to safety

I seem to recall reading that there is a clause in Winfield’s contract that his salary drops to $3M range if he isn’t a starting corner back. How do you convince him to make the move that will result in a significant pay cut when nobody currently on the roster is better than he is? With Chris Cook’s legal matters apparently getting worse, we would have to draft a stud CB, if not two in the upcoming draft.

Bears vs. Vikings Tickets - $150
Beer and food for 24 tailgate bus trip - More than $150
Watching Jared Allen destroy Jay Cutler LIVE - Priceless!!!!

SKOL Vikings!!!!

by boomy44 on Nov 21, 2011 3:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Great Point

im not sure how the salary would work because he would still be a starter just not a starting corner. Winfield is the best corner on the Vikes hands down. I’m just not sure how long he can sustain it. I think moving him to safety extends his career and puts him in a better position to succeed. Obviously if this move were to happen the Vikes would have to add some more depth at corner via free agency or the draft.

by RMDuke on Nov 21, 2011 3:23 PM CST up reply actions  

if memory serves, that clause is if Winfield is the nickel

"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."

Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.

by rj-b on Nov 21, 2011 4:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Technically

I think it’s just if he’s not the starting CB, but you may be right. I think having him play Nickel and/or safety would be the same thing, but maybe not.

White Horn Gold Pants

by DM_Purp on Nov 21, 2011 8:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Totally agree

It is time to evaluate what we have and what we will need. OL secondary and WR are the obvious choices but I’am not satisfied with our LB corps, we will have an early draft and we need to be sure if the we take a top 5 prospect or if it will be better to trade down and have 2 top 25 choices, the only way to know is to be sure that what we have now is good, or if we need to replace it. it will also be refreshing to see young players fighting for a spot in the roster. you have my vote for the new GM of the Vikings !!

by MexiVike on Nov 21, 2011 2:39 PM CST reply actions  

Mmm

SS is a concern because Sanford has been ok, but no more
FS I’d like Raymond to get some game time
CB Sherels and Burton need to be given some game time to see what we have

LT I’d like to see Love be given a game or two just to see if he might be a swing tackle
C if Fusco is the Center of the future lets give him some time there to see if he can develop a rapport with Ponder

by Voyageur on Nov 21, 2011 2:46 PM CST reply actions  

Hilarious

I laughed when I read this. Good stuff lol.

by RMDuke on Nov 21, 2011 3:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd like to see the young corners, and much more man-to-man.

Word on Burton was that he had elite man skills but struggled with zone. So at least put him on the opponent’s #1… Burton Island. Maybe it would get ugly, but so what.

I usually tend to think that our coaches know best and that there is a good reason for the things we see, as well as the things we don’t. Sorry, at this point I suspect they have little more of a clue than we do. At least we look at the players objectively, having formed no personal relationships.

by Jshore on Nov 21, 2011 3:02 PM CST reply actions  

It not clear to me that any of our CBs can play zone

We get carved up in the secondary.

I’d love to see Sherels and Burton get time at the corners.

"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin

by kcskol on Nov 21, 2011 5:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Yup me too

Sherels and Burton have something Griffen and Allen lack…speed. We need more speed at CB period. Can’t cover if you can’t run with them.

by nmvikesfan on Nov 23, 2011 2:27 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm on the fence about this

I know we as fans would like to see some of these young players. But the coaches see them everyday in practice. I would have to believe that the coaches play the best players. If any of these young guys were better options, I think we’d see them.

Also, I just don’t know how fair that would be to the veteran star players like JA, AP, KWill. I mean on one hand you’d have established veterans who still want to win every game and on the other you’d have a bunch of rookies who probably don’t give you the best chance to win. Plus I don’t know how I feel about putting Ponder and AP behind an even more pourous line.

Now if you want to pull the plug on the guys that won’t be back next year, i.e. DMac, well there you might have something. Question is, who won’t be back other than #5?

"God always comes first, then grades, (and lastly) football." 11-year old phenom Demias Jimerson on his reaction to being told that he cannot score more than 2 TD's per game in his Arkansas Pee-Wee football league.

by NMVike on Nov 21, 2011 3:02 PM CST reply actions  

2012 season officially starts now

I’m totally onboard with using the last 6 games to start evaluating talent for next season. I like Everson Griffin a lot – but at DE. I hate it when teams ask guys to do things they’re not capable of, and I just think he’s a stud DE in the making. Let’s not mess that up. I’d also love to see AP sit for at least 2-3 games and make sure his ankle is 100%. No sense in rushing him back – and this gives us the chance to see if Gerhart can ever be more than a decent backup (I’m afraid that’s his upside right now). I think the strengths of this team are the DL and hopefully the QB and of course AP. Time now to decide what the priorities need to be for next year before free agency starts and the draft.

BTW – anyone who’s been an army helicopter pilot has my immediate respect and admiration. Thanks Ted!!

by Torstein on Nov 21, 2011 3:10 PM CST reply actions  

DeMarcus Love to LT!

Guy’s big, strong, young, and he’s got quick feet! Try him now, and if he plays well, it might free up that first rounder to get other pieces of the very large rebuilding puzzle.

We all know this team needs a lot of new blood. At 2-8, they are completely out for any playoff spot. I agree with Ted that shuffling the rooks and new guys into the lineup can’t be worse than what we’ve been seeing. However, if the Vikings wind up with a 3rd or 4th overall pick, then they should go on a swapping spree and try to land at least a couple O-linemen and a couple good wide receivers.

One other thing I’d like to see is Caleb King brought up. In preseason he flashed burst and determination significantly better than Toby Gerhart’s. Maybe Gerhart is more suited to a Fullback role, but I’m not sure he could beat out D’Imperio for that job.

Also, I’d play Joe Webb at WR. Might as well find out if he can contribute this season in something other than gadget plays.

by jimbo55403 on Nov 21, 2011 3:10 PM CST reply actions  

I've been begging

for an O-line blow-up for a while now. I’m on board. Like you said, we know that pretty much none of the guys we have are any good- Hutch included; he should be HoF bound, be he is clearly in steep decline. Sully may be serviceable as a C, but that’s a position I’m not sure you want to settle for ‘serviceable’ at. (Granted, it’s not like we can draft 5 brand new O-linemen at once, so we, in fact, may just have to settle at that for a while.)

Seriously, having split my attention between the Vikes-Raiders game and the Pack-Bucs game yesterday, and then following pm the rest of the games afterwards for at least bits and pieces, I can honestly say that from the ‘eyeball test’ our O-line is a freakin’ joke. I saw O-line collapses here and there yesterday… but not NEARLY as consistently as I saw it with us. Even the Giants O-line, which had a bit of a rough outing against the Eagles, mixed their failures in with succesful pockets that gave Eli the time it took to make a good throw. Poor Ponder hasn’t had that… once. I swear.

It’s further hurting us in our ability to evaluate Ponder. Is he our guy? He looks like it, but it’s hard to be sure. Those INTs yesterday were pretty ugly. Is that going to be a trend? Or was it the understandable, panicked reaction of a rookie QB who’s tired of having 0 time to find… well, ANYTHING on the field? I mean, as ugly as they looked to the casual observer, can we really blame Ponder for not having a chance to notice the DBs who were in INT range/ position?? The guy had .8 seconds (according to Chris, which I’m 99% positive is in fact the actual calculation) from snap to release, or else he was going to die. What QB in the NFL can consistently avoid INTs in that situation, a rookie especially? (Perhaps Peyton Manning… as we have learned this season perhaps better than any other, he is apparently G-d.)

Furthermore, there might be SOME run-blocking strength there… but that’s next to useless when teams are stacking the box. Everyone knows to fear AP, so they take no chances. Even a great run-blocking O-line is going to struggle to open lanes consitently in that situation. The best thing for a team like AP is a bit ironic IMO… instead of focusing on a run-blocking O-line, focus on a pass protecting O-line. Why? Because the best thing you can do for AP is stretch the field with a respectable pass offense. Play a few succesful play-action fakes and make teams fear more than AP, and take away their ability to succesfully stack the box. It’s not like AP truly NEEDS a great run-blocking O-line… he does 90% of the work himself regardless. (Not saying it doesn’t help; just saying this method would help MORE.) If we were able to create pockets for Ponder ANYWHERE near what the Pats give Tom Brady, you’d better believe our passing game would take LEAPS and bounds, and then teams wouldn’t stack the box nearly as much. And once you don’t… AP is unleashed and there’s not a damn thing you’re going to do about it.

Phew… OK, rant/ tirade over. Sorry, the O-line is just boiling my blood lately. Had to get that off my chest. OK, move along, move along. At least you guys aren’t subjected to the story I was thinking about writing on the subject.

I'm at a loss for words.

Daily Norseman

by KJSegall on Nov 21, 2011 3:16 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

...

Some people just need a high five. In the face. With a chair.

The Daily Norseman
Off Tackle Empire

by Ted Glover on Nov 21, 2011 8:55 PM CST up reply actions  

conjuring up my greatest Cartman

GOD DAMNIT KYLE!!!!!

White Horn Gold Pants

by DM_Purp on Nov 21, 2011 8:56 PM CST up reply actions  

I would like to see some discussions on leadership and coaches

Before I can determine which people to play.

I mean, our O-line is coached by a guy who was on 3 SB championship teams as coach. Have you ever seen Vikings this bad up front?

Singletary’s LB corp has been non-existent until Oakland.

Special teams? Yeah, they’re special all right. The only time I don’t cringe is when Harvin returns a kickoff.

The defensive backs, um, need no further discussion except that we have had such infrequent excellent plays there that no one fears passing at us.

I mean, we have 6 interceptions, while 5 teams have almost 3 times as many, and none this year from our LB’ers. Yeah, I get it, Cook out and injuries, etc., but why do we lack an effective blitz, too?

Offensive schemes? Defensive schemes? Hello?

I just think we gotta start looking at who is turning us into a laughingstock here, because a good part of it has to come from those in charge. I don’t think we can pass off all these breakdowns on Chilly, because even though I didn’t like him, he isn’t here right now and adjustments have to be continually made by the coaching staff, they can’t just wait until the offseason.

by liveforadrenaline on Nov 21, 2011 4:29 PM CST reply actions  

I would love to see this happen, too.

We need to see what kind of roster talent we have moving forward so we can make cuts. I think a lot of vets are going to be walking out the door next year.

Also, Ballard has officially started the last two games over Remi Ayodele, and has looked impressive in his wake. He had that forced fumble on Michael Bush at the end of the game that almost brought us back, as well as some disruptive plays in the running game.

Hopefully, if we can grab a franchise LT in Round 1, our line would look like this next year:

LT: Matt Kalil/J-Mart/Riley Reiff (whoever we grab, not all three haha)
LG: Hutch
C: Berger
RG: Fusco
RT: Love

That’s what I’m hoping for, anyways. I like Berger/Fusco a helluva lot more than I do Sullivan. He plays weak IMO.

"Like I said, I don’t think anybody on this team knows what schism is, let alone could use it in a sentence. I thought it was an STD when I first heard it. And I was like whoa, we preach abstinence around these parts." - Jared Allen

by Landonio on Nov 21, 2011 4:29 PM CST reply actions  

I like the idea of embracing our cr@ppiness and using it to our advantage.

We should be playing the young guys whenever possible. However, wasn’t Brown the guy who played at RT in place of Loadholt when Loadholt got hurt this season. Brown had a rough game as I recall. If he got carved up on the right side, I think he’ll get killed on the left. However, if we can find someone for the LT spot, we could move Johnson to right guard. We could then move Berger to center. If we want to see what Fusco can do, we could move Johnson to RT where things are a bit more manageable than on the left side. However, it is all predicated on the idea that we have someone who can play LT better than Johnson. I’m not sure that’s the case. At other positions, I’d be okay with saying, “What the hell. Why not.” However, Ponder might get killed if we end up playing someone with less ability than Johnson. Anyway, I think its important not to throw Johnson out just because he hasn’t been a good LT this year. I think he’d make a heck of fleet-footed guard.

I definitely want to see Raymond, Burton and Sherels getting time on the field. Asher isn’t good, and there’s no point in keeping him on the field as a starter. Get the other guys some experience. T. Johnson and Abdullah should sit too.

I’m thinking that it’s very, very possible that we’ll be picking at #2 this year.

"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin

by kcskol on Nov 21, 2011 5:12 PM CST reply actions  

you never know

We might actually be BETTER with some of the other guys. I could see some miscommunication issues, but also, they’re going to play their butts off trying to earn a spot.

White Horn Gold Pants

by DM_Purp on Nov 21, 2011 8:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Get rid of Singletary

Being on the west coast I don’t get to see many Vikes games(not paying Directv ransom this year) but now and again I do catch them on TV like yesterday. Usually, I get the 49ers which leads me to my point. I have been posting all season to get rid of Singletary. When he was coach of the 49ers he made them a laughing stock. Now, with Harbaugh and the same players they are studs. Reason being they fired that lousy couch Singletary. Now, Singletary gets to whisper in LF’s ear all season, him being the LB coach and special ass’t to the HC. Many of us have posted on this site about the LBs missing a step this year and not being able to cover receivers, well the main reason is that rotten f—- Singletary. He can’t coach! I agree with all the personnel moves stated above and would love to see some other players get in the game. Also, its great to see passion from all the fans here, Vikings have the best fans in the NFL…now if we can just get the better players and coaches we will all have something to cheer about.

by CAvikesfan on Nov 21, 2011 5:16 PM CST reply actions  

Looks like it would be a great move to get rid of him

Singletary reminds me of another Viking. I wasn’t really old enough to pay attention to the games back in the early 60’s, but now that I’m reading up on things Singletary is a lot like Norm Van Brocklin, the first coach of the Vikings.

Singletary – fantastic player
Van Brocklin – STILL holds the single-game record for most passing yards in an NFL game – 554 and 9-time Pro Bowler and NFL champion with 2 different teams.

Van Brocklin – couldn’t coach very well. One winning season in 6 years with Vikings and a 37-49 record with the Falcons after getting fired here. Of course, firing him paved the way for Bud Grant and 15 years where the Vikings were feared.

by liveforadrenaline on Nov 21, 2011 5:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Singletary made the 49ers defense

He put all those players there and The new coach is great with quarterbacks

by jayj55405 on Nov 21, 2011 6:33 PM CST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Singletary might not have been....

…. a good head coach, but he knows a thing or two about linebacker play. And Frazier has know Singletary how long? LF knows who Singletary is and what he brings to the table.

by Vrooman on Nov 21, 2011 6:40 PM CST up reply actions  

True

My concern is that we’ve been getting worse at LB, not better. Maybe it’s just a transition. Who knows? I think Mikey can get it done. We just need to be patient around here and give our coaches a chance to work with these players. There’s a reason coaches usually get 2-3 years to showcase their stuff before getting fired.

White Horn Gold Pants

by DM_Purp on Nov 21, 2011 8:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Not having...

…. Ben Leber and Jasper Brinkley isn’t helping either.

by Vrooman on Nov 21, 2011 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Serious question to which I do not have an answer.

The game of football has changed a lot since Singletary’s playing days. Singletary was one of the best at the time no doubt. However are the lessons he learned at the time as relevant today? For example, it’s a passing league now, and our LBs are getting carved up in coverage. Is Singletary’s style and experience useful to solving that problem? I don’t know. I’m asking.

"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin

by kcskol on Nov 22, 2011 9:36 AM CST up reply actions  

Because he's been in a cave since then?

Also, I’m not sure playing linebacker has changed that much. I’m not expert either, but my guess is that a starting linebacker actually has to do less today than when he played because I think there is more substitution and specialization.

by amiller92 on Nov 22, 2011 4:04 PM CST up reply actions  

It's a conspiracy!

It’s all the linebackers coach!

Did he kick your puppy or something? No position coach is worth more than one comment, much less the many you’ve made on this topic.

by amiller92 on Nov 21, 2011 11:06 PM CST up reply actions  

love your line-up

especially the linebackers, i think griffen is a beast.
pass coverage cant be any worse than its been…

by los vikingos on Nov 21, 2011 6:39 PM CST reply actions  

The Vikings have......

A QB, a backup QB, a RB, a slot receiver, a DE, a DL, an OLB, a long snapper, a kicker, and a punter.

Every other single position AND backup position is up for grabs, IMHO. Name recognition and fondness for players who gutted it out through major injury must be a thing of the past. Performance, performance, performance has to dictate decision making going forward. Step up, or get the hell out.

by Mel Allen on Nov 21, 2011 6:57 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

The Vikings also have a couple of tight ends....

…. punt returner, and a couple of wide outs too. And maybe even a full back.

by Vrooman on Nov 21, 2011 7:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Ballard doesn't look too bad across K-Will yesterday...

I’d like to see him get the starting job and then add a guy for the rotation in the 4th round this year.

"Like I said, I don’t think anybody on this team knows what schism is, let alone could use it in a sentence. I thought it was an STD when I first heard it. And I was like whoa, we preach abstinence around these parts." - Jared Allen

by Landonio on Nov 21, 2011 7:15 PM CST up reply actions  

No question there needs.......

to be a return to building a successful organization and away from the philosophy of building a successful season. Successful organizations may not win all the time, but the latter approach is nothing but a crapshoot.

by Mel Allen on Nov 21, 2011 9:01 PM CST up reply actions  

It sure as hell doesn't help when....

your current hometown hosts can’t get their collective thumbs out of their asses and make sure that everyone knows where they will be conducting business.

by Mel Allen on Nov 21, 2011 9:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Belichick does two things well

He doesn’t care who his players start out as. He takes HUGE pride in developing draft picks or free agents or literally ANYONE into first-rate talent.

He is unsurpassed in creating a system that works. He spends a bazillion hours a year talking with successful coaches in college and former NFL coaches and elsewhere to strategize winning and on improving his system. Most coaches just hunker down with their own staff and draw up x’s and o’s, but he is constantly reaching out.

Note: the NE owner, Kraft, also expects his players to behave like winners and sits with every person entering the organization to tell them exactly how to do that.

by liveforadrenaline on Nov 21, 2011 10:47 PM CST up reply actions  

And.....

the Patriots have no trouble moving players before they are considered “done.” This garners the team maximum value in return, mostly in the form of good draft positioning. The team is managed like a business, not a patronage system, which makes loyalty to its tenured employees a key consideration.

by Mel Allen on Nov 22, 2011 9:17 AM CST up reply actions  

I suspect that the Patriots would have considered moving the following this past offseason...

1. Kevin Williams
2. Steve Hutchinson
3. Antoine Winfield
4. EJ Henderson

These guys have good reputations and perhaps could have garnered real value. However, I don’t think any of them would have given us 1st round or even 2 rounds picks in return.

In addition to those considerations, I think the Patriots would have outright cut several other starters on the team already.

"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin

by kcskol on Nov 22, 2011 9:44 AM CST up reply actions  

Agreed.......

frankly, I don’t think they would have even pursued Hutch five years ago. I am not criticizing him at all, don’t get me wrong. It just isn’ their style.
They unloaded Seymour at the top of his game. Most likely, they would have moved these players a few years earlier.

by Mel Allen on Nov 22, 2011 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Griffen

Does anyone else think that Everson could be a good/great middle linebacker? I know they tried him at outside but put him in the middle, he is big, fast and looked ok in coverage but could you imagine him coming free on a blitz up the middle?

by Dred on Nov 22, 2011 12:45 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
You Can Breathe Slightly Easier
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Secondary
Russian_arms_control_small
Season in Review: Chris Cook's Best and Worst performances in 2011
Biggun_small
1st New Vikes Stadium Image
Small
What got you hooked on the Daily Norseman?

Recent FanPosts

Biggun_small
SUCK IT MARTY! - Stadium Passes MPLS 7-6
Imagescaj02y87_small
We get NO RESPECT!
Small
Supplemental Draft and our Safety Situation
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Receivers and Tight ends
Grover_small
Purple Kool Aid - Oh Ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Photo_10_small
Percy Harvin and the 2012-13 Passing Game
Small
Jarred Allan VS DeMarcus Ware
It-could-work_small
Wait.....What? The MN Supreme Court Has To OK The Stadium?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Minnesota-vikings-logo_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall