A Viking 3-4 Defense
A couple years ago I started to see people around DN float the idea of a 3-4 defense for the Minnesota Vikings. At that time I scoffed at the idea and shamed those fans for not appreciating the depth and quality of the Vikings defensive line. After the last couple seasons this impression hasn't totally changed. I don't think the Vikings will or should switch to a 3-4 front, especially considering the coach's background and beliefs. But then again if there was a time to switch doing so after a season like this one would seem to be the right time. It may not be as crazy as I once thought.
ow I will admit that I am not a die hard fan, or a fan of the Vikings at all. I don't know the roster quite as well as any of you do as well. But I'm going to respectfully throw out some ideas for a switch and see what catches your attention. If I missed something or you disagree with my analysis of a player or position group let me know. After the jump I'll give a quick look to the positions commonly needed in a base 3-4 (no weird 2-4-5 packages in this piece) and how the Vikings current personnel fit these requirements.
The Defensive Line.
The 5 technique. Players who could fit this: Kevin Williams, Letroy Guion, Christian Ballarrd.
This is one of the easier things for the Vikings to fill given their current roster. The Vikings have done a good job of getting athletic big men who can shoot the gap and move the pocket if necessary or be able to seal the edge to stop the run. Williams and Ballard would be great starters in this line up with Guion spelling them and adding a good rotation.
Nose tackle. Players who could fit this: None.
Maybe I'm being harsh here, but watching the Vikings this year and following the comments from various DNer's suggests to me that a NT is needed. No one has replaced Pat Williams and so the Vikings don't have that big man who can anchor the line and get pressure off the three techniques and allow them to get the push inside. In a 4-3 this can be a serious problem, with a 3-4 this can collapse the entire defense. If the Vikes were to make the swtich they would need an unselfish two gaper to bang on the offensive line and free up the LB's or the 5 tech's to make the plays needed. Otherwise teams are going to run it straight down the gut on this defense all day long.
The Linebackers.
Inside Backers. Players who could fit this: Chad Greenway, Erin Henderson, E.J. Henderson
What better way to get value out of the big contract Greenway just got then to put him in the middle of the defense, let him call the plays, and give him more of a playmaking responsibility as an ILB in a 3-4? Him and Erin Henderson would be good at blitzes and going downhill to stuff the run. He still might be a liability in coverage, but allowing some of the OLB's and safeties to help should reduce some of problems that arise if any. This also could help the transition of E.J. Henderson. His main problem right now is that he doesn't have the top speed in order to cover in the Tampa 2 and get that deep middle under control. In this defense can specialize a bit more and focus on what he does best, stuff the short stuff, and allow the other ILB to compensate for what he is struggling with at the moment.
Outside Backers. Players who could fit this: Jared Allen, Everson Griffen, Brian Robison
There really are two positions groups that have a hard time making the switch, guys going from a 1 or 3 technique to a NT and those going from DE to OLB. Really the switch takes the guys out of their comfort zones and asks them to do something they may not want to do or really can do well. One of the biggest shames of Green Bay's switch to a 3-4 was that it basically ended Aaron Kampman's time as a Packer. He couldn't get use to standing up rather than his normal three point stance and he never looked that great in coverage. It would be hard to see something similar happen in Minnesota with Jared Allen. Really if he is not on board with this sort of switch it shouldn't be done. If he is on board he has the potential to be a pretty darn good OLB, but it's very tough to tell and it takes a guy willing to buy into scheme and position he is tasked to play.
Do you know who I think would be a great OLB though? Everson Griffen. The dude has the athleticism and pass rush ability to be a force at that position. He would leave offenses guessing what he is going to do and be able to bring the amount of meanness necessary to really make plays happen. Hell, if you are that size and able to be a gunner you can play OLB in my book.
Secondary: No real change.
The secondary of the 3-4 isn't that different from the secondary of the 4-3. The main changes would be needing more playmaking ability out of the safeties and possibly a bit more versatility out of the corners. Here's what I mean by that....
Right now it seems like the Vikings are targeting guys at corner who are big and strong. Makes a ton of sense in the current Tampa 2 system that relies on getting receivers off their routes with jamming them at the line and then settling into zones. The Vikings might need to get a bit more speed at the corner position and get guys who can either play man or zone, but then again I may be way off on this.
Similarly it could be a good idea to get a bit more punch at Safety for this switch. Since a 3-4 defense is built on unpredictability and playmakers all over the field, having a safety that can ball hawk or headhunt down in the box can go a long way. Another possibility for this is allowing Winfield to do this in a Charles Woodson like role if Winfield can come back healthy.
Now as I said before this is just one outsiders perception of what a switch may look like. Please feel free to tell me how wrong I am and where the flaws in the plan lie. I highly doubt the Vikes would make that switch, especially with a Tampa 2 disciple like Fraiser as head coach, but you never know what teams decide to do in this copy cat league.
This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hmm.
I kind of did something like this in the previous post and I think that it would work. Check it out.
by PurplePrideforLife! on Nov 26, 2011 12:21 PM CST reply actions
I did, it was a good write up
This post started as a comment on your post but it quickly became pretty long and I didn’t want to steal your thread.
by PackApologist on Nov 26, 2011 8:42 PM CST up reply actions
I agree that our personnel could possibly do it
But it is something that there is no going back from, because if you admit failure you’re done as a coach and then there’s only pieces left for the next guy, and that puts us years behind, situational players and no guaranteed scheme. I do agree what you say of our some of our personnel though:
-JA is athletic enough to play OLB, and in 09 he was asked to drop back in coverage about twice a game(for some odd reason) and didn’t look bad at it.
-Ev Griffen would see more action due to the switch, I believe, but we have no idea how his pass instincts are. He could be either ILB or OLB, but again he could be exposed in some aspects of his game. But I do agree, he would be simply terrifying coming downhill to stuff a run or rush the QB.
Here are downsides to this though
-I think Robison would be a casualty of the system change. He is solid against the run but we’ve never seen him try to drop back in coverage. Also, I think Robison’s year has slightly been some of the Ray Edwards effect. He is going to look good when he gets more 1 on 1s due to JA and KWill soaking up the blockers. I like him but I don’t see him making the cut in a 3-4.
-E.J, Antoine, Erin, and both our safeties are on last years of their contracts, and I’m not sure if we should make a run at any of them besides Erin Henderson. E.J. is coming back to form, but will not be dominant for much longer and that’s if he even comes back to his old dominant form. Antoine has shown to be more injured than let on (see the foot in 09, and neck this year) and our safeties have proven to be inconsistent and average at best on the upswings. It’s been argued that we move Winfield to safety, but his injuries scare me personally, but I’m not sure how the rest of the Vikings nation feels about this. I love the man and his motor and moxie, but I am afraid it’s time to cut ties, as much as it pains me to say this.
We need a NT badly, and while Ballard has looked good compared to Remi in the 4-3, but he isn’t big enough to be a 3-4 NT. He could pan out as a 4-3 NT, but could possibly be a casualty of a system change, and that’s sad since we just drafted him. There’s no guarantee Brinkley, Greenway, Onatolu, Ev Griffen, B Rob or whoever we chose put at Mike and Will can fit into those positions, or the OLB position opposite JA and that puts us behind another year or possibly years. Our Corners have been flat out terrible for like the last decade. And safety has been an issue since Sharper left.
This leaves me back to my initial statement. While this practically guaranteed overturn of personnel is a possibly an ideal time to make a switch, there is no going back from it. There has been some change here at Vikings nation recently and I think some constant would go a long way with this unit.
Also, as you said we would need JA to sign onto this project because without him there’s no buy-in, but I think this applies to KWill, too. He has proved dominant over the years, and is a fan favorite. I don’t see him enjoying the switch to a 3-4 end, if he does it at all. Our defense could end up in worse shambles than before, and we will have more pieces to pick up than before.
I see upsides to both defenses, but I think the Vikings are more suited to stay at the 4-3 than make a switch. We are 3 or 4 players short of being a sure-fire dominant 4-3 defense again(with possible answers on our roster atm being Ballard and Mistral Raymond), and if we made a switch we have a lot of question marks and no possible answers in sight.
You know I wouldn't worry about Williams and Ballard
I think both would make great 5 techs. Williams wouldn’t be too hard a sell since you could point to some of the pretty good 5 techs who are still able to rush the passer and get some of the glory. Best example would be Richard Seymore.
As for Ballard I don’t think he would be a casualty, he would just play on the opposite side of Williams. I think he’s got the right frame and power to seal the edge and push the pocket as a 5 tech as well. The real key then is finding the guy who can anchor it with an NT. Not an easy task, but not impossible either.
You are absolutely right about this being a no going back task. As much as the Vikings have the guys to pull it off now the drafting and scouting would change and it would hard to switch back from. Just ask the Cleveland Browns and their fans.
Thanks for the great response!
by PackApologist on Nov 27, 2011 12:18 AM CST up reply actions
Love 3-4
I’m a big fan of both really, but don’t your corners need to be able to play more man coverage in the 3-4? I think we have some of the personel to make the switch, but I don’t think it will happen with this staff.
by Dodger48 on Nov 26, 2011 2:24 PM CST via mobile reply actions
I would imagine that it depends on the school of 3-4
Like 4-3 teams there are various schools of thought as to which coverage used. Wade Phillips 3-4 is different from Dom Capers 3-4 which is a slightly different flavor from LeBeau’s 3-4 but each of these are very different from Rex Ryan’s 3-4. So it depends what kinds of coverages that your coordinator would believe in.
by PackApologist on Nov 26, 2011 7:10 PM CST up reply actions
I doubt the Vikes would do that
With Frasier’s background it just won’t happen. But considering the holes the defense has already, a switch to a 3-4 would be just as painless as a switch from the “158.3 passer rating” defense the vikings are currently running.
I think this is a really good idea, but it needs to wait a year. We have so many needs along the offensive line, not mention the entire secondary, that it wouldn’t be prudent to invest in a new defensive front 7 this year. Next year however I think we could follow Green Bay’s model and spend high picks on a NT and a rush linebacker to groom and replace Jared Allen once the front office is stupid and lets him walk or trades him. The guy is athletic enough to play rush line backer, so I don’t think the transition would be as painful as it seems. Also, as many of you will recall, Everson Griffen was played at OLB some this preseason. Foreshadowing? I hope so.
Really I think the Vikings need to acquire one piece to their front 7
The only thing the Vikes would need to draft is a NT in my opinion. This is a player they need to get regardless of the style of defense they run. This and the question of how Allen would fit would be the only major questions about making this switch. If they can get positive answers to both of these issues it could be a very smooth transition.
by PackApologist on Nov 26, 2011 7:14 PM CST up reply actions
Meh
I don’t think the 3-4 is all that and a bag of chips, first of all. Second, our inside backers are too small. Third, Jared Allen is an elite 4-3 end, and assuming he could make a transition to 3-4 OLB is a stretch. Given his size, it’s probably more likely he’d fit as one of the ILBs. But then that defeats his rush ability.
Too many round pegs in square holes. I don’t think the 3-4 has been all that great for Green Bay, despite the media fawning over it. Statistically, they’re an average defense, horrible against the run. And most 3-4 teams are weak against the run.
The issue the Vikings have is in the secondary. LB depth could be better as well. A run stopper alongside Kevin Williams would be nice, but that kind of player can be found in the lower rounds or FA. The simple fact is the Vikes have gone a decade without making an upgrade in unit that’s never been better than below-average since Ike Holt and Joey Browner.
Ummm.....okay
I guess I don’t get where you are getting most of your facts here.
1. Green Bay’s defense isn’t that great this year, granted, but it’s the passing figures that drags it down not the running defense. The run defense is rated at 13th right now which is about average. That’s after AP monster game against them. In fact that has been a consistent part of the defense for the Packers. In 2008 the defense was one of the worst in the league. In 2009 they were one of the better teams against the run and in 2010 they were middle of the road for run defense….so I don’t know if I wouldn’t use the word horrible to describe it. I am more than willing to let people call the passing defense horrible, but the run defense I’m skeptical of that description.
2. Jared Allen is 6’6" 270 lbs. Demarcus Ware is 6’4" 260 lbs. Aaron Kampman is 6’4" 265 lbs. As a result I’m hesitant to say that it’s Jared Allen’s size that would make him a poor fit for OLB. Really what I would say is that his ability to turn his hips and run in coverage. This combined with his general comfortableness with rushing from a two point stance is what caused Kampman to be slow to take to the OLB position and ultimately fail. Ware, who is roughly the same size as Kampman and Allen, does this pretty well, so it’s not really a matter of the physical build of the player but their willingness to work on this technique and his athletic ability (the looseness of his hips primarily) than anything else.
Apart from those things I didn’t necessarily write this to advocate the switch, more to look at how things would look if a switch were to take place since I have seen more fans and a few columnists push for a switch. I get not buying into the hype for it, and even the belief that there aren’t the players on board. I would state that there are more than you may think, but it’s probably a moot point since Fraizer probably won’t make the switch.
by PackApologist on Nov 26, 2011 7:03 PM CST up reply actions
oh the other fact I didn't get....
You make the point about most 3-4 teams being poor against the run. But the thing is that three of the top five defenses against the run right now are 3-4 teams (49ers, Texans, and Ravens). If we look at the top ten run stopping teams it is five of the top ten teams (Pittsburgh and Dallas would be included here as well). So I don’t think really matches up with your believe that 3-4 teams struggle against the run. Also if you look at the worst five running defenses in the league right night four of those five are 4-3 teams (Rams, Panthers, Colts, and Browns….the Chiefs being the fifth worst team against the being the only 3-4 team in that mix). Really it depends on the personnel, but I would think that these numbers cut across belief that 3-4 teams struggle against the run.
by PackApologist on Nov 26, 2011 7:08 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, that's not right
3-4 should be stronger, not weaker, against the run.
Also,
look at Mario Williams. Dude’s 6’6", 283. I haven’t been following very closely, but from what I’ve heard, he’s been pretty great at playing 3-4 OLB up until his injury. Am I right with that? I think Allen would be a great 3-4 OLB. He gets picks in pass coverage every once in a while and I’ve seen him break up a couple passes in coverage when he’s asked to do it for us. He definitely gets dropped back into coverage way more than any of our other D-linemen. He has a pick this year from an actual drop-back-and-cover situation. So I think he could learn how to do it. And I think Everson Griffen would be an amazing 3-4 OLB. Right now he’s a tweener for us. We’re not exactly sure how to use him (prime example would be using him as a gunner in the punt game, trying to use him as a linebacker in the preseason, and bringing him in as a DT in passing situations when his actual position is DE) but he would be able to contribute much more as a pass rushing OLB in a 3-4 system. I’ve never been an advocate of the Vikings switching to the 3-4 before this year, but now I’m really starting to come around on it. I think it should probably happen. How likely that it will happen is another matter, though. With the pass happy NFL being exactly that nowadays, I think the Vikings should really start trying to adapt to that instead of continuing with the thinking that the NFL is still a rushing league like they seem to be right now. In my opinion, that is one big way that we can get prepared for competing in the future.
It's my eyes
That tell me that Allen is not a linebacker.
The footwork, and the instincts/reads, required of playing in space is just totally different.
They were just discussing this in a video on 1500espn.
I don’t think it will happen. For something like this to happen, a GM may have to be hired and COMPLETELY overhaul the team. I don’t know though, just my opinion.
by christian220896 on Nov 26, 2011 7:17 PM CST reply actions
Not surprised that 1500 is talking about that
The article I cited was from Pelissero who is that station’s beat writer. I think that he’s the main beat guy that’s really pushing that issue for the Vikings to make that switch.
Like you I don’t think it’s going to happen, but it is an interesting idea considering the talent that is there but also the holes present. If a switch was going to happen it would seem about the right time.
by PackApologist on Nov 26, 2011 7:57 PM CST up reply actions
I was one of those guys who floated the idea about a year or so ago
I wrote a fan post on it once. I still think we should make that transition.
No. Just, no.
We don’t have the players for it. We don’t have the coaches for it. End of story.
SKOL Vikings!
Oh, and for more detail...
(why I’m wasting my breath on a cheesehead I don’t know)
We have no nose tackle, and we don’t have the right mix of LB. There are only two players that would really fit the 3-4: Kevin Williams and Everson Griffen. Jared Allen is the proto-typical 4-3 DE, and forcing him into a 3-4 is idiotic. Our coaches are die-hard Tampa 2, 4-3 defensive guys. So, this 3-4 garbage can be wasted on a site like the Acme Packing Company.
This is a place for fan posts…posts by fans OF THE MINNESOTA VIKINGS. Why don’t you go back to the Acme Packing Company where your fandom resides?
SKOL Vikings!
Let's not be bitter
As a Vikings fan, I’m fine with fans of other team posting well thought suggestions. He’s just offering subject matter. Don’t let his choice of fandom distort your view of the article itself which I thought was actually quite interesting.
by Coolio12 on Nov 26, 2011 11:18 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
Did you even take the time to read this?
I appreciate your feedback but most of your comments I actually incorporated. I mentioned twice that it probably isn’t going to happen due to the coaching philosophies. I did touch on the difficulty in transition for Allen and looked at a similar player who failed and why he failed at it. I also touched on the need for a NT (I also pointed out that an NT is probably needed for this roster regardless of scheme used which I don’t think is too controversial a thought).
As for why it’s here and not APC is because it’s about the Vikings and the Packers. I apologize if it offends you that an outsider has a perspective on the Vikings and wanted to share that as respectfully as possible. Right now the Vikings are a franchise in transition and I just figured this would be an interesting thought exercise and a different way to examine the defensive side of the roster especially in light of fans and Viking beat writers suggesting that this might be done. But as I said before I didn’t mean to offend, just throw an idea out there and see what the reaction might be and discuss this roster in a slightly different way than before. I apologize if that offends you so.
by PackApologist on Nov 26, 2011 11:19 PM CST up reply actions
blah, meant about the Vikings and not the Packers
by PackApologist on Nov 26, 2011 11:19 PM CST up reply actions
Don't worry
some of us really enjoyed your post and your outside perspective. I agree that it isn’t likely to happen, but it’s still interesting speculation.
Yeah,
he was actually really respectful and brought up a few very good points. Chad Greenway would be a really good ILB in a 3-4. He should probably be playing MLB right now, for that matter. Coming out of college he was projected as moving inside. Erin Henderson would be really good on the inside as well. Everson Griffen or maybe even Brian Robison (might be a bit of a stretch) could play the other OLB spot on the other side of Jared, and Cristian Ballard (if he continues to play well) could play LE in the 3-4. We’d have to find a NT, yeah. But Kevin Williams would be a great DE for 3-4 and I think Jared Allen would be a great OLB for it, as well. Look at Mario Williams. And Jared has shown that he’s decent in pass coverage when he drops back. And he couldn’t be any worse than Greenway. We could do it and have the guys for it, if we got a nose tackle that we need anyway. I don’t think we will do it, but it’s something to think about. I think PackApologist was respectful and didn’t try to start anything. No need for the bitterness.
Interesting
I would rather stay with a 4-3 however because of one key detail:
The Vikings had one of the best D-Lines in the league for a good stretch there, the key cog was a dominant NT. We have been left to the services of Remi/Guion/Ballard in the absence of big Pat Williams.
It could take one or two maybe even three seasons to smooth out such a transition, whereas plugging a good NT in our current scheme would be a much faster turn around. Our struggles this year just speaks volumes about the play of Pat Williams, very underrated in my book.
That one detail
See that’s what I found interesting as I was going through the roster and thinking about this particular post. As I stated a the start it was crazy to think of the Vikings making the switch due to the talent along the line. Now though there aren’t quite as many road blocks for player talent on the roster as one might expect.
An NT is needed definitely if the change were to happen. Every team that is able to stop the run with a 3-4 has one or possibly two of those guys on the roster. The interesting thing though is that I think that this is needed if the Vikes stick with the 4-3 they currently have. The major difference between a guy who would be a 2 gapping NT in a 3-4 and the type of 1 tech that the Vikings need is that the 0 tech or two gap guy might need to be a bit more selfless than the 1 tech since his job is to soak up o-lineman in order for someone else to shine. The 1 tech might be able to get a bit more glory and push for the pocket. Otherwise the job is going to be very similar in so far as the guy’s job is to anchor the line and ensure that the middle can’t be run on.
The other major question is if Allen can make the transition. If not then it shouldn’t be done. If he’s on board then I think he could handle himself in coverage. Just watching what he can do as an opponent of the team, I think that he has the athleticism and flexibility needed to drop into coverage and throw a offense into a bit of confusion. But again that’s one amateur perspective.
by PackApologist on Nov 26, 2011 11:26 PM CST up reply actions
Good thought provoking post - the idea has come up over the years off and on.
I hope it never happens. To me the 4-3 is the historical identity of the Vikings. I became a fan of the Vikings watching the Purple People Eaters. In the 90s there was a time we occasionally used a 5-man line when the running game was more emphasized. We don’t have the personnel to play a 3-4 – mainly due to linebackers in my opinion. I’d hoped the Vikings would sign Aaron Kampman when GB cut him. He and JA would’ve made a great pass rush.
I think the league goes in cycles. There was the Run-and-Shoot era with the Oilers & Lions – teams dropping TEs and using small quick WRs and reception records being broken every year. Then the league cycled back to the run game with guys like Emmit Smith, Terrell Davis, etc. Followed by the era of stretching the field with big WRs like Moss and the Rams’ Greatest Show on Turf.
I know we are in the QB era, colleges are using spread offenses and NFL RBs are not as valued as they once were because of their short careers. When defenses catch up with the current offensive system, the winning teams will move back to the run game. We might think Denver is a throwback team with their run-mainly attack. Tebow is 4-1 as a starter and just maybe they are onto something…
Just don't bring this up around
Alber Haynesworth. Hi might quit, stomp your face, or try to cheap shot a QB. Totally unpredictable.
by Jepp The Viking on Nov 27, 2011 10:50 AM CST reply actions
Nice theory, but you lost me when you said
the part about moving JA to an outside linebacker. Green Bay did that with Aaron Kampmann, and it was a disaster for him. Green Bay completely neutralized their best pass rushing threat because of the scheme and responsibilities he had in the 3-4, and he wasn’t good in it. As a result, I believe you guys needed to draft Clay Matthews after Kampmann left. Granted, it worked out, but Capers looked like an idiot after that first season. If ever there was a square peg in a round hole, it was Kampmann in the 3-4.
Another thing that no one is talking about is that Frazier is a disciple and believer in the Cover-2. As long as he is the head coach, the Vikings will be a cover-2 team.
Some people just need a high five. In the face. With a chair.
Well that's why I always say that Allen would need to sign on
I don’t know if Capers looked like an idiot after the first year. What people tend to forget is just how bad the Packers defense was in 2008. Really that was the reason that the Packers lost so many games that year more than the play of Aaron Rodgers. Teams would just run up the middle on the Packers and the defense would fold for that last score to put the game away. The 3-4 defense fixed much of that in 2009, but struggled in the passing game and especially against elite level QB’s. It’s actually similar to the problems that the Packers are facing this year.
The Kampman thing was the greatest shame of the transition. He was still getting good pressure on the QB and starting to get into the swing of things before his knee was shredded. Really he just never bought in and that’s why I would always say that Allen would need to sign on. If he believes in it and buys in then I think he would be great in the system. If not then it’s not worth the Vikings time.
Last small correction. Matthews was drafted in 2009, the same year as Raji. So Matthews was on the team as the same time as Kampman. Originally Poppinga beat out Matthews for the starting role for the first few games of that year playing opposite of Kampman. By the time that Matthews was emerging as the Packers primary pass rusher Kampman was lost to the season ending knee injury he suffered.
by PackApologist on Nov 27, 2011 1:40 PM CST up reply actions
Capers was an idiot
in the sense that he took (at the time) your best pass rusher and completely eliminated him as a threat. Obviously, he’s not a dope overall. Probably could’ve done a better job of clarifying that in my original post.
Wasn’t sure about when Matthews was drafted, so I wasn’t sure about that one. But it was a damn good theory, facts be damned.
Either way, my original point about Frazier being a cover-2 guy still stands. As long as he’s the coach, the 3-4 isn’t going to happen in Minnesota.
Some people just need a high five. In the face. With a chair.
The Vikings defense needs enough rebuilding (particularly due to age at a number of spots) that a switch isn’t as unthinkable as it was a few years ago. (And the relatively quick turnarounds by teams such as Green Bay and Houston show you don’t need to expect an extended period of growing pains anymore).
But, that said, I don’t see it. For the reasons mentioned here (Frazier, the lack of NT, questions about how well the pass rushers would adapt). But also, I think enough teams are running the 3-4 now that it almost makes sense not to go there as 4-3 players are suddenly more likely to slip a bit further in demand than they would have traditionally. Also, 4-3 teams tend to place more emphasis on speed, which works well for the Dome’s fast-track, not to mention the fact every division opponent runs a finesse offense.
In the end, they just need to focus on playing better defense before playing different defense. Overall they simply lack speed and playmaking. They lack fiestiness and swagger. They really don’t intimidate anyone. I don’t know what the composition is between coaching, scheme, philosophy, and player evaluation. But they need to get better, particularly since their best players—Allen, KWill, Winfield—are either close to 30 or beyond it.
A more aggressive 4-3 defensive
For me, its not the defensive alignment which is the problem, it is the passive Tampa2 philosophy.
I would like to see a more aggressive Jim Johnson type 4-3 defense using more variety and more blitzing.
To be fair to the system, it has produced some of the best pass defenses of all time (or at least recent history) (e.g., the Dungy Bucs and Lovie Smith’s Super Bowl Bears squad). I think the Vikings problems implementing have a lot to do with weird personnel fits. Their linebackers have never had great skillsets for it as none cover that well; they’ve struggled to find adequate DBs, even in a DB-friendly scheme; and they’ve valued run defense (even in the 2nd and 3rd levels) probably too much at the expense of overall team speed, which is really the soul of the system’s philosophy.
That said, I agree it’s definitly lost it’s luster a bit as a lot of bad teams have tried to run it and haven’t exactly looked great, but it’s tough to say how much of that is offenses adapting and how much of it is simply bad execution by the teams.
I think turnover rates have declined since Dungy and Kiffen first started tinkering with the concept way back with Minnesota, while at the same time passing percentages are increasing. These two trends are definitly not good for the Vikings’ philosophy. Part of the appeal of the idea of taking away big plays and forcing teams into sustained drives is they used to reward you with either an interception more regularly, or the offenses simply weren’t sophisticated enough to pick up enough first downs to finish a 12 play drive. Now, to use an extreme example of Aaron Rodgers, quarterbacks are more than happy (and capable) of completing 70% of their attempts while still taking care of the ball. They’ll throw 7-yard completions to the flats or on screens all day if they have to. Again, part of this is due to personnel (the Bears still manage to consistenly defend halfway decent (relatively speaking) against Rodgers, or at least about as well as anyone else does). But it’s probably a combo of both.
I guess that’s a long way of saying I agree with you. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to run a philosophy when you don’t have the horses for it, particularly when that philosophy isn’t as rewarding as it once was.
In all honesty, given the division, (beyond of course simply fielding more talented players) the Vikings might benefit from a mindset of adopting nickle/dime packages as their “base” defense. Nobody in the division (and, with a few exceptions, the entire league) hangs their hat on the power running game (although the Packers have gotten good at it when it comes to clock-milking time, a la the Saints). Maybe they should study some of the stuff teams like TCU do and try to incorporate some of that, as well. This would naturally require a tremendous turnover in the secondary (they already can’t field an acceptable secondary even with a simple, zone-heavy philosophy)), but that probably needs to happen, anyway.
Everyone is all about the 3-4 and you are seeing more and more teams move toward it
Which is fine because people who are good in the 4-3 will become less in demand! It’s not a bad idea and I read Pellirosowhatevers article as well, however I only think we should do it if we were really thinking about trading Allen to another team. Do that and a 3-4 makes sense we pull some extra talent and try something new. However we’d need a new defensive coordinator, and well honestly I would rather just keep the 4-3.
The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.
Griffen maybe
But I can’t see Allen or Robison playing linebacker.
Also, switching to 3-4 is blasphemous! ;)
yup many in fact
The ones who suffer the most are pass rushing DE’s and the DT who is going to be the two gappers.
One guy who benefited was Ryan Pickett. He was a fairly successful DT playing something akin to what Pat Williams did for the Vikings back in the day. He was moved to the nose and basically got less opportunity to rush the passer and more opportunity to face down two guys and get hit. He kept an open mind and became the key NT through 2009 when Raji was nursing an ankle sprain. He did pretty well and entered free agency being able to boast about his flexibility in schemes and was in pretty high demand. Also pretty necessary to the Packers and got a pretty good contract from the team even though he’s on the wrong side of 30 and TT doesn’t sign many of those guys.
Another story is one I’ve told many times through this thread and in the post itself, the story of Aaron Kampman. He was moved to OLB from being his three point stance as a DE. He never protested because he’s a stand up guy, but you could tell he never really liked the idea. He had troubles dropping into coverage and struggled getting a consistent rush from the standing position. By the time he was getting comfortable and into the flow of the scheme he blew out his knee and then left the team in the following offseason.
It can work it just takes the guy to be willing to buy in, just like any other scheme change.
by PackApologist on Nov 28, 2011 4:16 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
A guy buying into it certainly helps...
Kampman was one prime example. You get a guy who has honed his craft for years and then all of a sudden try to change everything they do. Works with some, but does not for most.
Especially the older ones.
The more I think about this idea, the more I kinda like the idea considering the emergence of Griffen and Ballard. We know Allen can play in coverage… But what about Kwill and Robison? Not sold on them working out in a 3-4.
KWill would play the 5 Tech
So his coverage ability really wouldn’t be much more than what he’s doing now. His role would be much more like Richard Seymore in Oakland or Brent Kiesel or Ziggy Hood in Pittsburgh.
by PackApologist on Nov 28, 2011 6:32 PM CST up reply actions

by 























