Ponder to start VS. Bears
It appears that Joe Webb will not see the field again this season (barring another injury to Ponder) This comes as a surprise to me, as I'm sure it does to many of you. However Frazier has come out to say that Ponder is still the first string QB and will start when he has cleared the NFL mandated tests for the concussion he suffered (which is his second so far)
"I think you always want to do whatever is best for your team and whatever gives your team the best chance to win,” Frazier said. “Right now, Christian being our starting quarterback, that’s our belief."
Frazier is set, for now at least, with having Ponder as our starting QB. However Ponder is not so quick to that assertion. He has complimented Webb on some fine play, and he knows that his job is on the line if he can't turn things around. This is what he had to say about it:
“There’s always pressure to perform. This is the NFL and you always have to perform otherwise your job is going to be taken away,” he said. “But I think it’s a positive thing. Whenever there’s competition I think you’re always going to get better. Obviously Joe is a heck of a player and has done a great job. That’s going to motivate me more to make my job secure and try to play better.”
There was no story with Webb's perspective in it that I could find, but I would say he is probably at least a little bit disappointed especially with the way he has played in relief duty. Personally I would have liked to see Webb start, however maybe Ponder would be served well with one last game to "redeem" himself. Either way I would expect there to be some major decisions this off-season and starting QB will be one of them...Thankfully it is between two guys with a lot of potential instead of two guys that are either career back-ups or hopelessly lost (T-jack, Rosenfels, pretty much all of our past QB's since Culpepper)
On a more humorous note, Ponder actually did better on his test after the concussion than he did before...seemingly getting some sense knocked into him
Here is a link to the story
This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i may be the only person on this forum to say so, but...
good.
if Ponder is cleared to play, then he absolutely should.
let’s not forget a little over a month ago, we were all begging for Ponder to get his shot. there was little chance a rookie could turn the season around, but most of us believed that he should get as many reps as possible, even if the season turned into a lost cause, because it would only better his development for next season and beyond.
this is not to belittle the recent play of Webb, who has since done an outstanding job in relief of Ponder when called upon. however, despite many fans who will likely disapprove of LF’s decision should Ponder start this Sunday, you have to look at it from a head coach’s point of view… you drafted a QB #12 overall — it’d be one thing if he wasn’t medically cleared to play, but since it looks like Ponder will be good to go for Wk 17, you absolutely, 100% have to go with the guy you drafted to be your QBOTF.
i sincerely hope fans will pull for Ponder, and not lament to see Webb on the field in his place. if Ponder struggles, i’m sure we’ll see Webb before the afternoon is through. if Ponder succeeds, it’s also not out of the question we’ll eventually see Webb on more than enough plays.
either way, pass the Captain. cheers.
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
by rj-b on Dec 28, 2011 11:59 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
Well written comment.
We have two really good quarterbacks on our hands. What to do, that is the question. Personally, I’d like to see Webb play this week as to Ponders concussion issue , but this kid (Ponder) seems to be of good character, and he’s talented, and want him to succeed. And Joe Webb is one of the most athletic guys to ever grace a football field. And while not being the most prototypical QB, seems to make our offense go, and is a fine character young man as well. Tough decision for Frazier. – Either way Webb sitting on the bench seems like a waste of good talent and, well shit if I know. This off season for the Vikes, decision wise, is going to be one of the most important in their history, and I hope we can make the right moves, keep the fingers crossed.
Build up your weaknesses until they become your strong points." --Knute Rockne
Its tricky though coming off a concussion
I’m glad he cleared the test but he is probably still at risk for another, he said that was his second concussion so that is already pretty alarming. However I agree with you otherwise. I think Webb will give Ponder a real run for his money for the starting job, but not until training camp. At this point in the season benching him could set back his development and we could end up with another T-Jack
"You can write articles and do whatever you want, you can break down every player. Good, bad or ugly. But we just aren't good enough as a team, as a group. Offensively, defensively and special teams, from the No. 1 on the roster to the last man on the roster. We just aren't good enough. It's as simple as that." - Chad Greenway
by Grape Drank on Dec 29, 2011 12:34 AM CST up reply actions
true, but even the mighty Aaron Rodgers has had multiple concussions
in a smaller time frame, no less. i don’t think that’s alarming anyone over in GB.
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
Hmm I didn't know that
I can only hope that Ponder will follow in his footsteps
"You can write articles and do whatever you want, you can break down every player. Good, bad or ugly. But we just aren't good enough as a team, as a group. Offensively, defensively and special teams, from the No. 1 on the roster to the last man on the roster. We just aren't good enough. It's as simple as that." - Chad Greenway
here's hoping
all the more reason why we need to focus on reinforcing the OLine.
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
Definitely agree with you on that
Our OL has got to be the worst collection of lineman in the league. It wont matter who is starting QB, if our OL doesn’t improve I don’t think there is any QB that will survive a full season behind them
"You can write articles and do whatever you want, you can break down every player. Good, bad or ugly. But we just aren't good enough as a team, as a group. Offensively, defensively and special teams, from the No. 1 on the roster to the last man on the roster. We just aren't good enough. It's as simple as that." - Chad Greenway
by Grape Drank on Dec 30, 2011 12:13 AM CST up reply actions
As a watcher and not deep in stats
I love Joe Webb. He makes plays. He makes the offense run. The politics of it is that Ponder is the #12 pick overall and he gets his time to develop because of that, even though Webb has proven his deserves starting opportunities to prove his value as a QB.
To this point in their careers, Webb has proven to be better at winning games than Ponder, but that doesn’t matter to coaches and FO personnel trying to save their a$$es. It’s only politics at this point, and Webb gets screwed for another season. Poor kid wouldn’t get a chance no matter how effective he is.
don't call me a conspiracy theorist but...
What if this is all a 3 year ploy to turn a WR into a QB and Webb will take over Ponder’s job once he is completely ready…. I don’t think that is the case but it would be pretty ironic
"You can write articles and do whatever you want, you can break down every player. Good, bad or ugly. But we just aren't good enough as a team, as a group. Offensively, defensively and special teams, from the No. 1 on the roster to the last man on the roster. We just aren't good enough. It's as simple as that." - Chad Greenway
by Grape Drank on Dec 29, 2011 12:54 AM CST up reply actions
Honestly...
I think this move gives us the best chance at losing and locking up the 3rd pick. I’m not convinced that Ponder won’t be the choice going forward, (I think he has a pretty high ceiling) but Joe Webb gives us a much better chance to win now.
The coaches have to trust their choice
I said this on another post, but Frazier made a decision and now he has to live with it. You have to give your QB enough rope to either convincingly hang himself or pull himself out of the fire with. Ponder has had a couple of bad games, now it’s up to him to figure out what’s going wrong and fix it. I don’t want another TJ experience where every year Ponder is dragged out like a pony and after losing a couple of games is benched for ‘next’ year.
The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.
by Grime on Dec 29, 2011 8:10 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Well said...
I love your rope analogy. I don’t see the coaches yanking Ponder until he proves over a period of time that he can’t move the chains and he’s not developing like a potential starting QB should develop. Webb would have to severely outplay him to force the coaches hand, which I think would be hard to do in practice when the dynamics of the competition are different. I like both players, but I haven’t seen enough out of either of them to make me comfortable to give up on one and run with the other.
This pretty much sums up my feelings
I don’t think Ponder’s shown enough to be anointed our franchise QB yet and I don’t think Webb has shown enough to prove he’s better than Ponder. It will probably be a back and forth with those two until 2013, at least.
Well put, rec’d
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Dec 29, 2011 10:23 PM CST up reply actions
Good.
Not a surprise at all. Ponder is a better QB.
Webb doesn’t run a sustainable offense. He just creates with his athleticism. That never works. Mike Vick, arguably the best “athletic” QB ever can’t even win with his “dream team.”
Christian Ponder is the better long-term choice. I’ve been saying it all year. It’s a no-brainer. Once we have an O-Line, he will be much improved. It’s tough to throw the ball when you have 2 seconds to make all the reads and release the ball.
I understand that’s the main reason Webb runs all the time, but that’s also the reason he looks like a QB. When 4 guys are running through the sieve O-Line, it’s a lot easier to run.
Hate on Ponder all you want, they have the same comp % right now at 54.8.
Christian Ponder is averaging almost a yard more per attempt (6.4 to 5.7)
In a year, this won’t even be a discussion.
When I say it's easier to run for Webb when 4 guys run through our O-Line...
I am referring he fact that both DE’s are behind the QB when he takes off. There’s no contain. They aren’t doing anything but rushing the passer because they know they have a good chance to beat our Tackles before the QB makes a read to pass or run. If the QB had twice the time (from 2 seconds to 4 seconds), this wouldn’t be a discussion.
If the DE’s contain Webb and he can’t run, he won’t be able to do anything in the passing game.
Funny because
a lot of Webb’s success last game wasn’t a result of his athleticism: his TD passes to Rudolph and Harvin, his deep ball to Percy in the face of a zero blitz. Those were all plays a traditional QB could make. He didn’t have to use his crazy athleticism and “run” to make those.
And I’m not sure it’s a good thing when you say Ponder has the same completion percentage as raw small-school QB that was drafted as a WR and spent most of the past two years 3rd on the depth chart. What Joe has done in his limited time in the NFL is amazing. It’s too early to say he’ll definitely be a legit starting QB, but to put a cap on his potential after what he’s shown so far is short-sighted.
by Asher14 on Dec 29, 2011 10:59 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Right on
I think you’re absolutely right about the unsustainable offense. I think part of his success is that he plays much differently from Ponder, so defenses often haven’t game-planned for his style of play when he takes the field. I think this makes him the perfect back-up. I also don’t think he’s shown anything that tells us his value as a quarterback goes beyond that. I’m not saying it doesn’t, just that we don’t know that it does. Part of why I think this is because, if I remember correctly, his second start last year was not as good as his first. Of course, my memory is quite possibly flawed.
He started the Phili game
and he did well. Not great, but he kept us in the game and limited mistakes. He had a good game.
The next game he started was against Detroit. It was Tarvaris Jackson-esque. 20/32 145 yards and 1 INT.
That being said, he was a rookie, and he should improve from it. Just as Christian Ponder will learn from his rookie year. But Joe Webb is successful because of his athleticism and that is not sustainable. It’s the NFL, not college anymore. I look at the “athletic” QB’s in the NFL today… Mike Vick, Cam Newton, Tarvaris Jackson… They’ve combined to go 20-25. I am not speaking race here, as I believe Josh Freeman is a pocket passer and he’s 4-11. I am just pointing out the fact that an “athletic” QB can be exciting, be fun to watch, and they’re easy to get behind, but they are not winning at this level.
Look at the playoff QB’s:
Alex Smith, Matt Ryan, Drew Brees, Matt Stafford, Aaron Rodgers, Eli or Romo, Tom Brady, Joe Flacco, T.J. Yates, Ben Roth, and maybe Tim Tebow… What does that show us?
They all are pocket passers (with the exception of Tebow, who’s actually got ok numbers passing over 20 yards, which is the reason he’s having this success.)
Aaron Rodgers only has 257 yards rushing compared to his 4600 passing, so I don’t want to hear the “Aaron Rodgers is a running QB” or anything like that. He’s not.
Pocket passers succeed. Joe Webb is not a pocket passer.
Your list of athletic QB's
includes TJack (who is no more athletic than guys like Rodgers and Ponder), Newton (who is a rookie playing with a horrible defense but set the rookie record for passing; he’s having arguably one of the best rookie seasons ever) and Vick (who has been to the Pro Bowl and playoffs a few times and made it there last year). To say that you have to be a pocket passer to be successful is not accurate. You need to be able to make the right throws at the right time: that’s what’s important. If a QB is only ok at passing and great at running, eventually that will be exposed; I wholeheartedly agree. But if he can run AND he can make the throws, that makes them even better than a traditional pocket passer. Think of Big Ben. His value is extending plays with his athletic ability and size. He takes a lot of sacks because of that, but he is one of the best at extending plays. Big Ben wasn’t a great QB coming into the league, but he made the most of his abilities and has improved his passing to the point where he currently is now (mulitple Pro-Bowls/Super Bowls). He’s grown from a QB that depended on defense and the run game to The Man that carries the Steeler offense. If a guy has to depend on running to make plays then yes, that’s a problem. But just because a guy can run that doesn’t mean he is less than ideal compared to a pocket QB.
by Asher14 on Dec 29, 2011 3:52 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
And TJack has 105 yards rushing this year and a 2.7 average.
He’s not a running QB.
No, he's not a good rushing QB
I think everyone knew when Childress first carted that lame horse out that he was supposed to be a quick athletic QB that could move the tape with his feet or arm. Sadly neither proved true.
The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.
perhaps that's why he put Webb at QB...??
too little, too late…
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
You do realize that the list of unsuccessful pocket passers is a lot longer...
…than the list of successful ones, right? And it wasn’t so long ago that a NFL team could win simply by running the ball. The NFL changes and adapts. All other things being equal, athletic QBs are more dangerous to defenses than non athletic QBs.
And by the way, I hate to break it to you, but Webb is a better pocket pass than Ponder. Ponder has some areas of strength, but his pocket passing isn’t one of them.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
not sure there's enough evidence either way to prove that...
…considering maybe 1 out of every 3 or 4 passing plays actually has a sustained pocket.
until we re-haul our OLine, we won’t know who the better pocket passer is.
from my own observations, Ponder has a more ‘polished’ throw (tighter spiral, etc), and has great accuracy on the timed throws. strangely, he struggles when he actually has time to observe the field (seldom as that may be).
Webb clearly has the better arm, but frequently throws wobbly or out-of-place balls which are bailed out by the receiver. i’ve also noticed he tends to make the initial read, and, if it’s not there, he’ll end up running it himself more often than not.
i dunno what tape you’re watching where you can assess that Webb is the better pocket passer… especially considering he has a whopping 31 attempts on the season. pretty small sample size to be able to reach a conclusion so assuredly.
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
Naturally, I disagree.
Webb’s pass to Rudolph for the TD was not a perfect spiral though it was a perfect pass. Webb struggles to get a tight spiral on his touch throws when he’s slowing down his throwing motion. That was evident on the pass to Rudolph and to an extent on the one to Rice in the end zone last season (i.e. the TD pass that was overturned). However, the placement of both balls were excellent. Webb also struggles with placement on balls when he passing while on the run. I think that’ll improve, but it’s a weakness at this point and particularly so because of the comparison to Ponder who throws an excellent ball when on the move.
But now back to the “pocket passer” comparison. Webb throws a good ball, spiral and all, from the pocket on balls that are thrown with a full speed motion. He can hit receivers at the edges of the field and on intermediate and deep routes better than Ponder does. Ponder’s throws tend to be a bit slower and on deeper balls also less accurate by comparison to Webb’s which certainly implies that Webb’s spiral on those sorts of passes is every bit as good if not better than Ponder’s.
In response to your last statement, yes, I have watched Webb’s 31 attempts this season. I’ve watched his 120 attempts over two seasons. And I also have watched Webb in pre-season. I’ve also watched all of Ponder’s attempts as well. That’s what I’ve been watching for purposes of making this comparison between the two.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
we'll agree to disagree
i don’t think there’s enough tape on either QB to make a fair assessment, but so be it.
(also agree that Webb is better than Ponder on deep passes, i think they’re pretty close on intermediate with Ponder having the strong edge on the shorter routes.)
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
his short routes
are the ones that keep getting picked.
by midnightwonder on Dec 30, 2011 6:49 PM CST up reply actions
shorter 'timed' routes
i should have emphasized that.
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
I think an athletic guy like Webb could be successful, and have a playoff team
However – The NFL has stacked the odds AGAINST non-pocket passers. The rule changes have been in favor of the stationary QB typically. For Webb to be a good QB he will already need to work a lot harder than many of the guys on your pocket passer list, that is just the way the game is right now. I could go on and on about the rules, but just know that it really sickens me that the league is forcing teams into a certain mold with rule changes. Running teams are left in the dust and for what? So we can have two or three quarterbacks a year breaking records…
I would love to see Webb be our QB, as a run first offense I think he fits a lot better than Ponder. He is a decent passer from what we have seen, and is a threat on the option as well. If we could use AP, Gerhart, Harvin and Webb on designed run plays (AP would be the work horse, but they should all get some touches at the very least) We could have a deadly offense OUTSIDE the mold of many teams offensively speaking. The advantage to that of course is that defenses will be stuck trying to figure out what makes the Vikings so different, and how to stop that.
I realize Ponder is going to be a good QB but I just think the league rules give him an advantage over Webb – unfair in my mind, obviously not to league officials…
"You can write articles and do whatever you want, you can break down every player. Good, bad or ugly. But we just aren't good enough as a team, as a group. Offensively, defensively and special teams, from the No. 1 on the roster to the last man on the roster. We just aren't good enough. It's as simple as that." - Chad Greenway
by Grape Drank on Dec 29, 2011 10:04 PM CST up reply actions
I just saw a segment on NFL Turning Point about Cam Newton
and the Panthers using 2 back sets and running option plays. Man that was cool. It adds another dimension to their offense and it looks like something the can use regularly. It was a great segment. I was imagining the Vikings using that with our multiple backs. I think either Webb or Ponder could run it, but I was kind of invisioning it for Webb.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
keep in mind Carolina has a great OLine
not to say such an idea wouldn’t work here, but i think that plays a huge factor in its success.
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
no use in blaming the rules...
…especially when refs don’t call a blatant facemask on Webb during the final play against Detroit.
…or overlook a clear helmet-to-helmet on Ponder that sent him out of the game with concussion-like symptoms.
both of those non-calls happened in what would be considered a “pocket” play. your angst should be directed toward a bias that appears to favor established, elite QBs on winning teams.
if anything, that is what needs to be reviewed by officiating crews in the offseason — consistency amongst penalties on QBs.
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
Yeah definitely agree about the officiating
They are having a pretty big impact in a lot of games
"You can write articles and do whatever you want, you can break down every player. Good, bad or ugly. But we just aren't good enough as a team, as a group. Offensively, defensively and special teams, from the No. 1 on the roster to the last man on the roster. We just aren't good enough. It's as simple as that." - Chad Greenway
by Grape Drank on Dec 29, 2011 11:56 PM CST up reply actions
You have been saying it all year, but....
Webb doesn’t run a sustainable offense.
I think some definition of what “sustainable offense” means would be helpful. I say that because this year you could randomly select any of Joe Webb’s 8 series as QB, and chances are that you’d end up watching him lead the offense the length of the field for a TD.
Go back and watch his performances this year and last. His quickness and speed on the ground are breathtaking, and as a result it’s the stuff that sticks in one’s memory. However, his passing has moved the chains on a lot of 3rd down situations.
Hate on Ponder all you want, they have the same comp % right now at 54.8.
Christian Ponder is averaging almost a yard more per attempt (6.4 to 5.7)
There’s not much hate for Ponder in these parts, but your slant on things does bring out the urge to note the comparisons. You chose the only stat in which Ponder if performing at a higher level than Webb. However, if we’re looking at games in which both Ponder and Webb have been QB (e.g. Lions and Redskins), the fact is that Webb has a higher yard per attempt. Webb is at 6.0 and Ponder is at 5.38. Webb’s QB average (including all the Webb Cat nonsense) is 103.7 to Ponder’s 74.2. Webb’s “passing TD’s” to interceptions is 3-0. Ponder’s is 13-12. And in terms of moving the offense, well, it’s hard to suggest that you can do better than 5 TDs, 1 FG on 8 possessions. We’d easily have 11 wins under our belt at this point if Ponder was producing at that level.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
re: 3rd down conversions...
i think the ‘sustainable offense’ explanation is obvious (i.e. it won’t last for very long…), but i’ll let mak field that should he choose to since it was asked of him.
however, i’m sorry man, i have to question this…
Go back and watch [Webb’s] performances this year and last. His quickness and speed on the ground are breathtaking, and as a result it’s the stuff that sticks in one’s memory. However, his passing has moved the chains on a lot of 3rd down situations.
how is this any different from Ponder (who is 50/88 converting on 3rd down)…?? Webb is 3/4 this season, 16/27 career — projected out, not only does Ponder have the larger sample size, but he has the higher:
- percentage of conversion (56.8%, vs Webb’s 52.1%);
- yds/att (7.31 vs Webb’s 6.63);
- TDs (2 vs Webb’s 0);
- and INTs is a wash.
not trying to create arguments or controversy, but it’s comments like this that just completely don’t make any sense to me. i know you think i’ve been “Webb hating” over the last few weeks, but to use your own words, other fans’ “slant on things does bring out the urge to note the comparisons.”
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
by rj-b on Dec 29, 2011 10:14 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Don't know what kind of calculator you're using
But that 16/27 for Webb is 59.3%, which happens to be better than Ponder’s. I’m not going to argue with the rest of it, except for the exclusion of INTs, seeing as Webb has what, 0 this season?
that 52.1% actually should have been...
…52 conversions if you project Webb’s stats out to match Ponder’s 88 attempts. thank you for the correction, got mixed up crunching all those damn numbers…!!
point to emphasize, they both convert on 3rd down nearly identically, and Ponder has the great sample size to draw from. meaning, if someone is to argue Webb moves the chains on 3rd down, they also must recognize that Ponder does the same, with higher yds/att and TDs to boot.
(INTs was a wash b/c Webb threw one last year on a 3rd down — i was projecting all of his career stats in 3rd down situations, giving him 3 INTs, matching Ponder’s total.
off-topic, i should certainly hope Webb wouldn’t have any INTs given he’s only made 31 attempts this season.)
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
Flim flam
…52 conversions if you project Webb’s stats out to match Ponder’s 88 attempts. thank you for the correction, got mixed up crunching all those damn numbers…!!
point to emphasize, they both convert on 3rd down nearly identically, and Ponder has the great sample size to draw from. meaning, if someone is to argue Webb moves the chains on 3rd down, they also must recognize that Ponder does the same, with higher yds/att and TDs to boot.
Noone I’ve read, including my own post, made any comparison about Ponder’s 3rd down conversions to Webb’s. My point is that CONTRARY to what you and some others have said about Webb, he’s not just about moving the ball with his feet which is the point I was addressing from mak’s initial comment. The fact is, as you’ve just pointed out, he’s every bit as clutch with his 3rd down passing as Ponder.
One important difference of course is that this season the offense has been unstoppable when Webb’s been at the helm. In fact, in last week’s game, Webb’s offense moved the ball so well that it didn’t really get into 3rd down situations much at all. First downs came on Gerhart’s 67 yard run, his 14 yard run, Harvin’s 31 yard reverse, Webb’s 36 yard pass to Harvin, Webb’s 23 yard pass to Aromashodu and a later 5 yard run to Gerhart.
off-topic, i should certainly hope Webb wouldn’t have any INTs given he’s only made 31 attempts this season.
You kind of walked into this one, but I think it points to the double standard you have going with respect to Ponder and Webb as passers. In Ponder’s first start, he had 32 passing attempts and 2 INTs, and he was widely congraluated for having had a promising first game. For the entire season, Ponder has 1 INT for every 23 passes.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
fair enough
the way i was reading it, it seemed to imply that Ponder was not effective (or as effective) passing in 3rd down situations.
again, though, while the offense has been ‘unstoppable’ with Webb in at the helm during recent games, it can’t be stressed enough that he entered mid-game. the offense opened up, to be sure, but this comes back to the comment of sustainability long-term. (i also question whether you can attribute Gerhart’s 67yd run to Webb being in at QB, but to each his own).
and valid point on Ponder’s 2 INTs — though i hope i don’t come across as trying to ‘justify’ those INTs, it’s only fair to point out they were against the Packers, who have a league-leading 29 INTs on the year.
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
Regarding Gerhart's runs...
I don’t know if Gerhart’s success had anything to do with Webb being in the game or not. He was pretty spectacular after contact on a couple of his runs, and Webb didn’t have anything to do with that. On the 67 yard run, Gerhart essentially ran untouched until the end of the play.
Here’s what I did notice though: Once Webb and Gerhart were in the game, the Redskins regularly played 8, 9 and even 10 men in the box! Gerhart hit the holes extremely well and made the O-line look very good. Also the Redskins were regularly putting 6 guys on the line of scrimmage. I wonder if the 6 guys on the LOS was intended to keep Webb contained within the pocket. I don’t really know for sure; I’m only spitballing on that one.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
I noticed the same thing...
Gerhart is better at reading the holes than Adrian Peterson… I truly believe this. He has great vision and toughness, but he won’t blow anyone out with his speed. I’m actually surprised he went 67 yards on that play. I kept waiting for him to get caught from behind.
I think we Gerhart at RB we will experience less 20+ yard runs, but also less negative runs, which is what AP did a lot. Instead, we’ll have a lot of runs that go for 3 or 4 yards and a lot of runs in the 10-15 range. More consistent, better vision, but not near as explosive. I think Gerhart can be a solid RB in this league though.
Our OL isn't terrible when it comes to running the ball
They are just slow, this benefits Gerhart a lot more than AD. The Vikings have been a running team since Culpepper and Moss left town, I would say we probably face 8+ man fronts almost always. I am excited for the future though, I think if we can manage to get Gerhart and Peterson both touches throughout a game and throw a curve ball with and end-around to Percy, or a Webb option hell maybe even some carries for D’Imperio we could have an offense that is effective, and unique.
That way the teams that have built defenses designed to stop passing teams (which is almost all teams) will have a lot of difficulties stopping a power running team, hard, physical and successful.
"You can write articles and do whatever you want, you can break down every player. Good, bad or ugly. But we just aren't good enough as a team, as a group. Offensively, defensively and special teams, from the No. 1 on the roster to the last man on the roster. We just aren't good enough. It's as simple as that." - Chad Greenway
I appreciate the effort. Good stats (with the correction noted below).
I would point out however that I simply made the comment:
[Webb’s]quickness and speed on the ground are breathtaking, and as a result it’s the stuff that sticks in one’s memory. However, his passing has moved the chains on a lot of 3rd down situations.
It was in response to mak07’s comment:
Webb doesn’t run a sustainable offense. He just creates with his athleticism. That never works.
I was not making any comparison to Ponder. It was simply a statement that Webb’s converts with his arm just fine. What you’ve done (once the stats are corrected) is point out the same. Webb converts on 3rd down passing situations every bit as often as Ponder.
"Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
As long as....
…. there is an open competition for the starting QB job next training camp and pre-season, everything’s cool.
Yea, absolutely.
Webb has shown that he can make the team go when Ponder sputters. Ponder has shown that he can manage the offense and make short west coast type throws. But Ponder doesn’t show much pocket presence, and Webb has shown great poise in the face of pocket pressure. I think that a true open competition would be the best thing. Frazier seemed like he tipped his cards and signaled that already too.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
agree and disagree
Webb has shown that he can make the team go when Ponder sputters. Ponder has shown that he can manage the offense and make short west coast type throws.
100% agree.
But Ponder doesn’t show much pocket presence, and Webb has shown great poise in the face of pocket pressure.
this, not so much.
Ponder showed presence (when a pocket was actually present) up until the Lions game, where they blitzed the crap out of him. opposing defenses following that game followed the same model, and succeeded in shutting him down.
as for Webb in the pocket, considering how seldom a pocket is sustained and how often Webb escapes pressure, i truly question how anyone can gauge whether or not Webb has even had enough opportunities in ‘a’ pocket to prove his poise. he has kept drives alive — fact. but have those drives been a result of him holding fast in the pocket?? i honestly don’t think so.
"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."
Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.
There is at the beginning of every season, but yeah.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Dec 29, 2011 10:26 PM CST up reply actions
There wasn't....
….. open competition this past training camp. Most training camps start with an incumbent who isn’t losing the job no matter what.
This is so untrue,
Maybe in NO, Foxborough, and Green Bay because of the contracts, but there is always open competition. That’s how you get the best product on the field in every position.
If we can't laugh at ourselves, Packer fans will call us crybabies and we will be forced to kick their tooth in. I really don't want to go to jail (again).
by Alittlemore_cowbell on Dec 30, 2011 1:18 PM CST up reply actions
At this point
I really don’t care who starts, I just want a consistent QB for years to come that either lights it up or continues to grow at the QB position to the point of lighting it up; one thing I do know, that’s GOT to start with a decent O-line

by 
























