Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Albert Haynseworth to Vikings?

Don't crap yourselves, it's just speculation. Furthermore, a quick disclaimer- I'm not a fan of this idea by any means, but it struck me last night as interesting that it hasn't come up, so I wanted to discuss it. I'm actually against this idea but at the same time it wouldn't surprise me to hear it popping up as the offseason goes along.

Here's why:

  1. Albert Haynseworth's time as a Redskin is done if Shanahan can get any sort of deal done for it.
  2. Pat William's time as a Viking is all but surely done.
  3. Pat Williams is a defensive tackle who will need to be replaced. Albert Haynesworth is a defensive tackle who will need a new team.
  4. When the speculation was rampant that Shanahan would get rid of Haynesworth prior to the start of the 2010 season, Haynesworth expressed interest in the Vikings (although the Vikings had 0 need and therefore 0 interest in him at the time).

Furthermore, consider the additional following:

  1. The Redskins, under the leadership of Dan Snyder (arguably the worst owner in the NFL), are arguably the dumbest team in the NFL, particularly when it comes to trades.
  2. The Redskins need a WR.
  3. Bernard Berrian is a WR.
  4. Bernard Berrian is a Viking who the Vikings are likely interested in no longer being a Viking.
  5. The Redskins are potentially dumb enough to trade Haynesworth outright for Berrian.

 It would seem by the above two trains of thought that an Albert Haynesworth for Bernard Berrian trade could potentially happen. Again- this is entirely speculation, I haven't heard anything out of the Vikings FO giving me this idea- it just seems like a possibility. Now, let's also not forget that Jimmy Kennedy is a potential outright replacement for Pat Williams, depending on whether or not the coaches like him enough to promote him for that job. Furthermore, with Everson Griffin's recent... misadventures, and Haynesworth recently also charged with assault, Leslie Frazier might not feel like dealing with two near-felons (presuming Haynesworth deals his way out of the charges, which seems likely) on his D-line.

And of course, let's not forget Haynesworth... again, 'misadventures' as an unhappy Redskin who totally fleeced that organization. Kevin Williams and Jared Allen are both renowned hard workers who expect the best out of themselves and also their teammates; however, they really haven't had to deal with laziness considering they were lined up with Pat Williams and Ray Edwards, both hard workers and team players in their own right. How well they would handle any potential misbehavior or laziness from Haynesworth would remain to be seen.

Again- I'm not advocating this idea by any means. I'm in fact entirely against it, and would remain so if my prediction that this will start floating around comes to pass. I can't stand lazy players or those who don't play for the team, and Haynesworth was both all while being paid a disgusting amount of money by the Redskins. That said, there is also the point that the 'skins got suckered into paying that gianormous roster bonus for him- so we'd be off the hook for the biggest chunk of his contract, as well as the point that Haynesworth, when he feels like it, is a rather talented player. Furthermore, his biggest beef with the 'skins was the transition to a 3-4 defense, a defense the Vikings (currently) eschew. (It would be massively interesting to see whether or not the Vikings deal with the loss of two key players on their D-line by, in fact, switching schemes- although it would require a bit of an upgrade at our current LB situation.) And a deal for Haynesworth for Berrian wouldn't be the worst trade we could ever make.

Again- it's both, for me, food for thought as well as something I believe will begin to pop up time and again, even if it's just Haynesworth saying he'd like to wear the purple and gold.

What do you guys think?

Poll
Will rumors of an Albert Haynesworth trade to the Vikings be something that will potentially float around in the near future?
Yes- and I in fact like the idea.
82 votes
Yes- but I can't stand the thought.
29 votes
Maybe- hard to say.
35 votes
No- Frazier won't want to deal with this guy.
87 votes
Other (explain below).
4 votes

237 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.

Comment 59 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Gosh, I hope not. I don't want him anywhere near my Vikings.

Welcome, ladies and gentleman, to the aftermath of the chaos of the 2010 season. I now look forward to the draft. Help the O-Line! SKOL VIKINGS!!
And why did Cris Carter not get into HOF?? As my coach would say, the ballot voters had their thumb up their butt and their mind in Arkansas. I have nothing against Arkansas though.

by ccrunner on Feb 13, 2011 5:43 PM CST reply actions  

I would be OK with adding him.

He would be a great replacement for PWill. I think he is getting a raw deal from Shanny.

The dude never would have signed to play for a 3-4 team because he did not want to play nose. What is wrong with that?

It is like signing a left tackle and telling him you want him to play right tackle. Or signing a 3-4 LB and then telling him to become a 4-3 LB.

The dude is still a beast and next to KWill the Vikings would not miss a beat.

His contract is …

2/27/2009: Signed a seven-year, $100 million contract. The deal contains $41 million guaranteed, including a $5 million signing bonus, all of his 2009-2011 base salaries, and a $21 million guaranteed option bonus in the second year. Haynesworth is due a $29 million “poison pill” in 2013, effectively making it a four-year, $48.2 million deal. Another $15 million is available through incentives. 2011: $5.4 million, 2012: $6.7 million (+ $500,000 workout bonus), 2013: $8.5 million (+ $20 million “discretionary signing bonus” + $500,000 roster bonus due 8/31 = Poison Pill Year), 2014: $10.3 million (+ $500,000 roster bonus due 8/31), 2015: $11.5 million (+ $500,000 roster bonus due 8/31), 2016: Free Agent

If the Vikings did trade for him they would only have him for a couple of years. The question is what do the Redskins want?

Berrian & Kennedy may be something they consider but they probably would want a pick too. They know that the Vikings may release Berrian anyway so why trade for him?

I think that a conditional 2012 pick with these players may work. They certainly are not going to get a high pick. Maybe a 3rd or 4th.

by MarkSP18 on Feb 13, 2011 6:52 PM CST reply actions  

The dude never would have signed to play for a 3-4 team because he did not want to play nose. What is wrong with that?

I agree for the most part. I mean, it was his choice where he wanted to play and he did make it clear that he wanted to play in a 4-3 defense. He had a right to be pissed about having to switch defenses.

His attitude is always disappointing too but I think Shanahan definitely made a spectacle of it. It didn’t really ever seem like he wanted things to work with Haynesworth. The whole Haynesworth saying he wasn’t good enough to play in the base defense comment was certainly odd. I’d assume that was something he was told and not something he himself felt.

The only thing is would the Vikings FO really want to take on his enormous contract? Maybe they could try and re-negotiate it or something?

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on Feb 13, 2011 9:55 PM CST up reply actions  

ok look

If some one is going to pay you $100 million, you do whatever the hell they ask you to do. If Dan Snyder had gone up to Albert and said, “Hey Al, I want you to put on a tootoo and serve drinks in my executive box this week,” Haynesworth better put on a smile, and do it. I don’t care what he wants to do, he does what the coaches tell him to do and he needs to do it as best he can. People have had to switch defenses all the time, often they can excel at it too.

by SkolNick on Feb 13, 2011 10:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Well...

dunno about putting on a tutu and serving drinks, that might be a tad much.

But I do agree that at the price, he should have at least given it a shot, particularly to at least help his TEAM out. Football is a team sport- I therefore like team players. Being pissed that a scheme switched and therefore not even bothering to get into playing shape in time is a true ‘me’ move, not a ‘team’ move.

Certainly, complaining and pushing for a trade is fair, in a sense. A player does have to retain some ‘me’ aspects just to survive the business part of football. But that said, when it didn’t happen, he should have done his damn job- again, particularly at that price. Look at Ray Edwards- he was clearly NOT happy with his contract situation going into this season. But once it was said and done, the man went out there and did what he was asked, and worked his arse off and remained a team player- not locker room cancer like Haynesworth.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 13, 2011 11:16 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree that he should have at least given the defense a shot, and that’s why I said his attitude was disappointing. But, like I also said, it was HIS choice on where he wanted to go, and of course the scheme the teams plays is going to be a big part of that choice. I mean, he was arguably the best 4-3 DT in the league in Tennessee in their 4-3 scheme. Obviously he’s going to want to play in that same scheme again.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on Feb 14, 2011 11:11 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't think it would work out

Let’s remember what first caused Haynesworth’s falling out in DC. He didn’t want to play in a position and defense that didn’t work for him. Let’s put aside his low work ethic, selfish attitude, and weak motor; he is ONLY willing to play in HIS position, in HIS defense. He wants to be in a position to get the best stats possible (which I think he only wants to get a juicy contract) which is the 3 technique. A position currently occupied by the best 3 tech DT in the league in K. Williams. Haynesworth isn’t a smart person, and he wouldn’t be able to see that his best situation would be between Jared Allen and Williams, he would see that it’s not where he wants to be and he would be the whiny, selfish, lazy person that everyone thinks he is … a reputation he wholeheartedly deserves.

by SkolNick on Feb 13, 2011 8:51 PM CST reply actions  

Well, I dunno about that.

I don’t think it takes intelligence to see he’d benefit more in our scheme than in the Redskin’s scheme. I mean, with K Williams and Jared Allen, he’s going to have some decent stats, if simply because defenders will have multiple, dangerous threats to prepare for.

Furthermore, Haynesworth did say he wanted to play for the Vikings last offseason- which was, in fact, a dumb thing considering (like I said in the post above) that we had no need and therefore no interest in him- particularly seeing as how whoever had him was going to be cutting a large check last season for his… “services”.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 13, 2011 11:20 PM CST up reply actions  

You must be kidding.

Haynesworth was just arrested this past week for assaulting a man during a road rage incident. You take that, his history of anger issues, and his poor play and bad attitude in Washington… and I’m SHOCKED any of you would want that clown playing for the Vikings. Get real. Not gonna happen. EVER.

by rovibe on Feb 13, 2011 10:25 PM CST reply actions  

It's a very valid point.

Again, particularly considering our D-line already has a recent troublemaker on it.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 13, 2011 11:21 PM CST up reply actions  

CHECK THAT

The Vikings will bring in Haynesworth the same day they release Adrian Peterson sign Tarvaris Jackson to a 5 year, $70 million deal.

by rovibe on Feb 13, 2011 10:26 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

I don't know

you got mike singletary, and leslie frazier, two guys that deserve everyones respect, you light a fire under his ass he may be ready to play…

by Matty J Blige on Feb 18, 2011 7:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Is it fair to say.....

that he is one of the most overpaid, overhyped players in NFL history? He takes a cleated shoe to the face of an O lineman a few years back and then has some success on a line which included Kearse and Van der Bosch. Since then? Not much. He just happened to come into contact with one of the dumbest owners in the league, Dan Snyder, who develops tremors if he doesn’t write a ginormous check at least once every six months. DON’T WANT HIM. He is a LOSER who was lucky to get paid once.

by Mel Allen on Feb 13, 2011 11:16 PM CST reply actions  

Snyder is a moron.

That’s why I believe a BB for Haynesworth trade would be a possibility. Mark is correct in the fact that BB is likely to be released anyways, so most teams wouldn’t bother trading for him (similiar to our Sage Rosenfals situation in the preseason- why trade for someone you can get for “free” with a little patience?). But again- Snyder is a moron, and Wilf isn’t. I bet he could fleece that egotistical idiot. At worse, a conditional draft pick might have to be thrown in. Hell, throw M. Williams in while you’re at it.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 13, 2011 11:23 PM CST up reply actions  

If the Vikings are at the point.....

where this guy is to be considered, then they deserve to reside in the cellar of the NFC North for many years to come. I want WINNERS on the Vikings, period.

by Mel Allen on Feb 13, 2011 11:25 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm with you on that.

Consider many of my points on this post as me playing ’Devil’s Advocate’. Again, as my disclaimer read at the beginning of the post, I’m NOT in favor of this move- it would just genuinely surprise me to not hear about it more in the following months.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 13, 2011 11:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I hear you....

I just get my back up with so much hypothetical speculation. It would be like comparing Brett Favre to Jeff George. They both have many similar qualities, the big arm, the numbers, the freakish DNA, etc. But, where they part ways is between the ears, the stuff you can’t see on a stopwatch during pro days. As Yogi Berra would say, “90% of this game is half mental.”
Maybe this is why I am pulling for a guy like Webb to succeed. He may not win right away, but he is a winner. Book it.

by Mel Allen on Feb 13, 2011 11:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Are you saying...

that a guy who tailgates someone and then beats the crap outta them lacks mental stability?

Absurd.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 13, 2011 11:55 PM CST up reply actions  

That was probably....

the most passion he has shown for a damn thing in a couple years. This is the kind of player that destroys everything they come in contact with. Think about Shanahan. Before last year, you hardly heard a negative story about him, EVER. Now? All his decisions are coming into question, whether its his dealings with Albert Aintworthshit, his handling of McNabb which resulted in suggestions that his success as a head coach was due primarily to Elway, etc. It all snowballs once an individual like this has the spotlight shone on him.

by Mel Allen on Feb 14, 2011 12:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Shanahan wouldn't do that trade

Snyder may be an idiot. Shanahan may be an idiot too…but he’s not that big an idiot. Shanahan also has enough control over football decisions like that to prevent such a trade from happening.

by PackApologist on Feb 13, 2011 11:52 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Hmmm.

OK, valid point. We’d essentially have to fool the Redskins into believing we wouldn’t release Berrian regardless. If we can do that, Shanahan’s apparent hatred (it’s beyond dislike at this point) for Haynesworth, as well as the ’skins need at WR, might create the deal.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 13, 2011 11:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Plus

It also would depend on any other offers the ‘skins get for Haynesworth. His recent antics on and off the field considered, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to believe BB and a conditional pick would be the best offer presented.

Again- this is all said under the protection of playing Devil’s Advocate. I’m sure as a Packers fan you’d love to see us suffer Haynesworth. :P

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 13, 2011 11:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Oh I would.

Although there have been other ideas by fans adovcated here that I would love to see more than that. At least Haynesworth gives the hope of being really scary…instead of just being a bad idea from the get go.

by PackApologist on Feb 14, 2011 12:03 AM CST up reply actions  

He'd probably have one good season.

Generally, players like that do great their first season with a new team and a ‘fresh start’. Then once the spotlight fades they revert to their old selves.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 14, 2011 12:33 AM CST up reply actions  

Exactly.

That’s why I wouldn’t really want to see it. Players like that will put up a monster year while motivated, and then suck it up for the long term.

Right now I’m in short term mindset for the Pack and wouldn’t want to deal with a motivated Haynesworth in a system he feels comfortable in.

by PackApologist on Feb 14, 2011 12:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Oh, and I HAVE to ask.

Which ideas do you speak of?

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 14, 2011 12:33 AM CST up reply actions  

Well....

My favorite so far is signing Longwell to a contract and then drafting a kicker so Longwell can mentor the younger kicker.

I’m also not convinced that Kennedy is a young replacement for P.Will. Sure he’s younger than Pat, but in the NFL 30 is not the new 20.

by PackApologist on Feb 14, 2011 12:51 AM CST up reply actions  

LOL

Yeah, I’ve seen your comments on that. I agree- a kicker is a kicker, their job is not so difficult as to recquire ‘mentoring’. It’s a crucial position to be sure, and you’ll want to get it right, but that said, you generally are either getting a good kicker in the lower rounds of the draft or FA, or you’re not. They generally don’t ‘develop’, they just are.

I did disagree some with your thoughts on the importance of a kicker, however. Look at the Saints- their kicker pulled it off in the 2009 NFCC, and that sucked for us and was good for them. Then he sucked against the Falcons and someone else (forget who), and dumped two games for them.

To me, a solid kicker is who generally is going to win the tight game. Yes, Favre’s miracle pass against San Fran will be well remembered- but you are faaaaaar more likely to see a kicker win the tight game than even the clutchiest of QB’s.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 14, 2011 12:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Well that was a big of exageration

Sometimes I over stress some of the points to get across the main idea. A clutch kicker is huge if a team has one. In fact that might be the best argument for keeping Longwell, he can be clutch. This is also the reason why I believe Vinneteri should be in Hall, even though he’s a kicker.

At the same time though a kicker is a kicker. There is no reason to mentor them or keep more than one. and even though a clutch kicker can be the difference between a championship and disappointment, let’s not think that a team needs to start investing tons of time and money into the position to get it right. It’s probably the easiest position to find on the street.

by PackApologist on Feb 14, 2011 12:28 PM CST up reply actions  

You're right on that.

Again- a kicker is a kicker. They’re either going to be good at their position, or they’re not. It has to be the position with the least transition from college to the NFL- and when I say the least, I mean none. If you were clutch and on-target in college, you’ll be so in the NFL.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 15, 2011 6:24 PM CST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t want to see it. You guys have a veteran team, and a great DL coach. If you stick Haynesworth in between Jared Allen and Kevin Williams, you better bet he’s going to have good success, which in my opinion, is the cure to everything. If he’s putting up sack numbers and playing on one of the better defenses in the league (I think you could be if you added Haynesworth), he’s going to be happy about it. Maybe for selfish reasons but nonetheless he’d be happy.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on Feb 14, 2011 11:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Until...

He tailgates someone else and beats the crap outta them too. Or if the spotlight shines brighter on Jared Allen than him. Or if we have a down season like the one we just had. Or he is too busy hanging out at strip club buffets with Bryant McKinnie to be in shape by game 3. Or [insert any variable here].

It’s kinda like the Vince Young thing. I’m not a fan of this for the same reasons that I’m not a fan of that. Both had childish, immature problems recently. Yes, both are solid athletes and pretty decent at their position. (I’d say Haynesworth is by far the better DE when he wants to be than Vince Young is at QB when he wants to be.)

Look at our recent Randy Moss experiment. Some players do stupid things in their youth and reform. (Michael Vick.) Others don’t. When a player is the age Haynesworth is now, or even Young is now, and they are still acting like they’ve been acting, then they’re just not gonna change. You can count on them to be succesful when things are going great- but that’s not how teams win Super Bowls. After all, look at your Packers- the fact that your team dealt so well with adversity, and that no one turned into a crybaby when things looked bad, is what pushed being a #6 NFC WC seed into being the Super Bowl champion. I garauntee that if Raji were like Haynesworth and Rodgers were like Young, you guys wouldn’t have even made it into the playoffs- even if you kept their talents as is and the rest of the team exactly as is. They would have melted, whined, complained, and become locker room cancers.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 14, 2011 12:28 PM CST up reply actions  

I understand your point but I think some of his past can be overlooked. Firstly, the assault charge. I think we should let that play out a bit. And while it does, keep in mind that Allen had 2 DUI charges and McKinnie hit somebody over the head with a pole at a club.

I agree that he’s immature, and hard to put up with but I think he was that way because he just didn’t fit in, in Washington. If he came to you guys he’d be back in the 4-3 where he excelled. And he’d have success because he’s too talented, and so are Allen and Williams for him not too.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on Feb 14, 2011 2:49 PM CST up reply actions  

So PAD, if we (Packers) were still in a 4-3, would you want him in the green and gold given everything we’ve seen about him in the past 3-4 years (good and the bad)?

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Feb 15, 2011 1:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree…I don’t think Snyder would go for it either actually. He’s about going after the HOT guy and overpaying for him but Berrien is years from being the hot guy. Why would Snyder want to give up one has been for another??

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Feb 14, 2011 11:20 AM CST up reply actions  

It all comes down to...

1.) How bad does Shanahan want Haynesworth gone, and
2.) What other offers would they get for him?

Again, I believe Shanahan would take it if it were the only or somehow the best offer. And it wouldn’t shock me if it were, again considering how low people’s opinions of him must be right now. (Him= Haynesworth.)

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 14, 2011 12:21 PM CST up reply actions  

But ultimately they want the money freed up. Unless they really WANT Berrien, getting him in the deal really doesn’t accomplish much. It brings on another bloated contract for a guy that doesn’t really bring much to the team. I’d rather get a project player than a guy like Berrien who’s on the down side of an okay career. But who knows…maybe they like Berrien, I just think he’s shown his true colors the past 2 years.

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Feb 14, 2011 1:12 PM CST up reply actions  

LOL

Your point was too vague. Can you clarify if you’re in favor of the trade or not?

(Sarcastic humor doesn’t always translate well over the interwebs. Please don’t bother answering that.)

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 13, 2011 11:59 PM CST up reply actions  

The Two-Step
3 The Redskins need a WR.
4 Bernard Berrian is a WR.

Welllll…… technically speaking, I suppose you’re right…. :)

The Redskins are potentially dumb enough to trade Haynesworth outright for Berrian.

Which is a good idea IF

1 – The Vikings are sticking with the 4-3
2 – They believe that Big Al won’t become a cancer in Minnie, which requires a substantial suspension of disbelief.

Of course, the idea has merit in that it gets rid of Berrian once and for all, and they could then trade Big Al for someone we really do need….

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Feb 14, 2011 8:17 AM CST reply actions  

Well I am still all for it

The dude made All Pro as recently as 2007 & 2008. Then he goes to Washington who does not know what to do with him and he is a bad guy.

I will await the recent charges brought against him to see what actually happened before I convict a guy. I am kind of funny that way in that I assume the man is innocent until they prove him guilty.

Regardless, it is not like he has TWO DUIs is it? But I guess that is OK and not as serious as the “charges” (not convictions) brought against Haynesworth.

The simple fact is that Kennedy and Evans were both inactive for over 7 games last year and they played in 11% and 7% of the snaps respectively on defense.

If we really believe they can handle even 50% of the snaps all season then we are fooling ourselves.

He would make the line pretty stout with him, Allen, & KWill.

The money may be an issue though. I could see him getting the next two years but after that he would have to restructure or be let go.

The bottom line is some of these guys may not be nice guys. I like a nasty defensive tackle personally.

by MarkSP18 on Feb 14, 2011 10:28 AM CST reply actions  

He’s not a bad guy cause he couldn’t make it work in Washington…this is why he’s a bad guy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5nlEA8BUTQ

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Feb 14, 2011 11:18 AM CST up reply actions  

That is old news dude

And we never knew what Gurode did to him.

I wonder if Gurode had taken a shot at his knees? Maybe he said something about his momma?

All I know is he apologized to Gurode and everyone else and has not stomped anyone since.

And I see that no other offensive linemen has messed with him since.

Like I said, I do not mind my defensive tackles being nasty.

by MarkSP18 on Feb 14, 2011 11:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Does it matter what gurode did? He STOMPED ON HIS HEAD dude! Its not nasty, its a pansy thing to do. He didn’t even knock the guy down he just went after him while he was defenseless on the ground. I get that he totally hates that he did it but his actions the last couple years show ME that his head stomping was more of an indication of who he is than anything else.

By the way, you know what else is old news? Haynesworth playing well. When was the last time he was a factor?

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Feb 14, 2011 1:19 PM CST up reply actions  

I guess I just don’t want to see this guy on any team. He’s just a poison, I should probably want him on your team for that reason but I fear he has a relapse on his anger management so I don’t want him anywhere near my team either! haha

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Feb 14, 2011 2:12 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm willing to overlook the whole assault incident.

You’re absolutely right about Jared Allen- he reformed quite well in that regard. Michael Vick would be another great example.

One thing that bothers me, as I posted above, is the age. Both Vick and Allen were quite young (relatively speaking) when they did their stupid things. I’m far more inclined to forgive someone for stupidity in youth than stupidity in mature ages, like Haynesworth is at.

But again, let’s overlook that. What bothers me is his handling of the whole scheme shift in Washington. Yes, it was in his right to complain, and even to push for a trade. Again, if you’re 100% selfless, teams will totally abuse you as a person and a player- an NFL pro simply can’t do that and survive the business aspect. But that said, I think he took it waaaayyyy too far, ESPECIALLY at the amount he was being paid- and yes, that matters to me. Again, if we’re willing to let players retain some selfish ‘me’ attitudes to surive the business aspect, well, Haynesworth had already banked, and did bank. The truth is he will never, ever get that kinda contract again- no matter how succesful he was. No team would be stupid enough to pull that stunt again, and furthermore, by the time his contract was up with the ‘skins he’d be far too old to warrant anything even in that ballpark.

So with that in mind, when a trade didn’t happen and he still got his ridiculous bonus, he should have manned up and done his damn job. Again, I compare it to Ray Edwards, who wasn’t even in a well paid situation like Haynesworth. To me, Edwards, who is still in his prime, had a far bigger concern- and yes, he complained and let his displeasure be known. But once it was all said and done, he performed to (at least to me) the best of his abilities, didn’t quit, and in general was a hardworking team player.

Again, like I posted above- it’s a huge red flag for me. It strikes me as being the kinda thing where he could revert to those antics over a number of situations, even situations as simple as Jared Allen having the spotlight instead of him.

Locker room cancers are what keep teams out of the Super Bowl. Talent is great and helps tremendously, but teamwork and effort is what wins the day. Again, compare Green Bay and Pittsburgh. QB aside, I’d say, once Woodson was out of it, the Steelers had better talent at each position. And while no, the Steelers didn’t have any locker room cancers of their own, the adveristy that Green Bay had overcome all season allowed them to continue working as a solid team, even when players were STILL dropping like flies in the Super Bowl itself.

Haynesworth isn’t that kind of player- he’s shown this. If we were in the position Green Bay had found itself in, I’d see him quitting on us.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 14, 2011 12:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Well I cannot argue with your view

But I do not like the DTs we have now. Any talk of Kennedy and Evans being viable replacements is beyond me. I do not know how a guy can be inactive for half the year and then start the next.

So it is a risk. No doubt. But it may be worth the reward IMO.

I still have to always go back to the fact that I really do not know what went down in Washington or anywhere else with Haynesworth. So I cannot speak on it.

All I know is what he can do on the field and he is much much better than any other players we have right now.

You play the game to win!

by MarkSP18 on Feb 14, 2011 1:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Couple thoughts from an outside perspective...

1. You really want this hothead idiot on your team? Have you seen what he’s been doing lately?
2. Berrien…really guys you have to stop overvaluing him. He had Favre throwing to him and he couldn’t post a big year. I don’t think teams are going to give ya much for the guy. Favre is notorious for making okay WRs look great and Berrien got WORSE.
3. I think you guys need to get younger and look more to the draft and build a young core (like the Lions and Packers have been doing)…that is what I would want to see more than bringing has beens like Haynesworth!

The Green Bay Packers...Putting bad coaches out of their misery since 2010

by TrevorR on Feb 14, 2011 11:17 AM CST reply actions  

1.) I don’t. Again- Devil’s Advocate, and Bored Cuz There’s Nothing Else to Talk About.
2.) I agree. This is the only possible deal I see for him, again, mostly because Shanahan will probably take anything to get rid of Haynesworth, and he won’t exactly be fielding daily phone calls over the matter. In all likelihood, Berrian will be cut. The only way it won’t happen is if he takes a massive paycut- in which case, hell, keep him for a few downs a game.
3.) I’m fine with that- really, the fact that we’ve been the antithesis to that strategy is what’s kept us out of the Super Bowl for far too long. It all worked like magic in 2009… but then showed what happens just one year later in 2010. I’d much rather be like you guys- a consistent threat because the team in general has several years in it.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 14, 2011 12:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe a new place is what he needs?

Could Frazier get him straighten out? The guy could be a force in the league again but man that contract. I think the Vikes pass on this one.

by iowaron on Feb 14, 2011 4:45 PM CST reply actions  

No Thanks

Sounds like he could and probably should be in Jail.

by rukiddn on Feb 14, 2011 6:18 PM CST reply actions  

Well, Haynesworth a deep subject

Pushing peeps outta the way to Sack,demoralize the Q.B. and get them out of game has its probs. If they dont play with anger and agression they are taking plays off,if they play with agression they get fined thats a hard line walk.Add on top of that everday hassles,wife,kids, I can see where a guy could get aggressive and lose it.
Theres not 1 poster here who hasnt had a bad day from alarm clock ringing until laying head down glad day is over and if you say you havent your a liar.Now most of us arent 270 plus Def linesmen trained to inflict damage,we are just ordinary joes and we blow up at stupid shit ourselves.
Now I aint fighting for or againts Albert,just a mile in his shoes might be tough for anyone walk in,Shanahan made life a little tough for him and whole thing could have been played better.No player worth his salt wants to see his stats reduced,not one player that truly loves playing wants a reduced role.No one wants to play out of their comfort zone and 4-3 is what Albert succeded at,by switching ot of the 4-3 to the 3-4 you took him out of that comfort zone.
 We are all creatures of habit,any of you doing the same job for at least a yr have that zone,if your a right hand writer and H.O. decides its better you write left hand and will save 2 pens a year how would you feel.
 Now granted his actions havent been best in past weeks,but would be an intriguing thought have him online,be a pretty good thing think about.

by speedlod on Feb 14, 2011 10:49 PM CST reply actions  

Based on your argument

The vast majority of DEs, LBs, NTs, and DTs should be hyper aggresive individuals who occasionally commit assault- which is thanfully not the case. Take Jared Allen for example. His mistake was DUIs- not assault. And Jared Allen seems more aggressive than average- hell, his hobbies include hunting (including, apparently, hunting boar with a freakin’ knife at one point) and cross-training in MMA. And again, to the best of my knowledge (please correct me if I’m wrong), he’s never even once been accused of assault. Many of us should remember the video of him at a club after someone called his then-fiance a filthy name- Allen was flipping out, but he was held back by individuals he could have certainly bowled outta his way had he simply snapped and been truly determined to blast that scum. And jeeze- I bet a lot of us here wouldn’t have handled that situation with half the self-control he did, and we’re not DEs.

I’ll accept the ‘innocent until proven guilty’ arguments right now for his assault- as well as apparently feeling up a waitress. (See below). But if it is true, then it’s a blemish on his record, just like Everson Griffin’s antics are a blemish on his.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 15, 2011 1:36 AM CST up reply actions  

New prroblem with Haynesworth.

As it turns out, Haynesworth doesn’t want to join the Vikings. Apparently, he read this post, and just to make sure us anti-Haynesworth types have more ammo, he went out and felt up a waitress- adding sexual assault (or harrasment, I’ve read the charge listed both ways) to his current charge of straight-up assault.

Pretty sure if nothing else, at this point he’s the last guy we want as Bryant McKinnie’s teammate.

Nothing's tougher than being a diehard Vikings fan.

by KJSegall on Feb 15, 2011 1:38 AM CST reply actions  

i agree..... there is no other way to say this nicely...the guy is a F'ing ass of the highest caliber

everyone in the metro Washington area is sick and tired of his antics on and off the field…. i cringe every time there is breaking news on the Skins on local TV… 99.9% of the time its fat Albert getting in trouble again…. no way would i want this dude to be on the Vikes squad……

Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company.
~Mark Twain

by meno on Feb 15, 2011 11:08 AM CST up reply actions  

He's a contract player

He plays well when its a contract year, then slouches his way through the rest. He has a new charge pending for sexual assault with a waitress that he supposedly groped while paying his tab. When he’s on he’s really good, when he’s off he loafs & gripes. The Titans have said that another problem with him was he wanted input on defensive calls & talked smack about the front office during other players contract talkssaying they were under paid. Overall he’s a million $ player with a nickel brain!

L. A. Player

by L. A. Player on Feb 15, 2011 7:39 AM CST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Rec this statement-Turn it Green with Albert's money.
Overall he’s a million $ player with a nickel brain!

IT IS TIME TO DO WHAT IT TAKES TO DRAFT A FRANCHISE QUARTERBACK.
No more old guys. No more excuses. No more passing up our own great drafted quarterback.

by lifelongvike on Feb 15, 2011 1:21 PM CST up reply actions  

I considered it for just a little bit(actually got a little excited at the thought)

But after calming myself, I realized I was excited about BB leaving, not the acquisition of Buttersworth.

by DM_Purp on Feb 15, 2011 1:59 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
You Can Breathe Slightly Easier
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Secondary
Russian_arms_control_small
Season in Review: Chris Cook's Best and Worst performances in 2011
Biggun_small
1st New Vikes Stadium Image
Small
What got you hooked on the Daily Norseman?

Recent FanPosts

Biggun_small
SUCK IT MARTY! - Stadium Passes MPLS 7-6
Imagescaj02y87_small
We get NO RESPECT!
Small
Supplemental Draft and our Safety Situation
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Receivers and Tight ends
Grover_small
Purple Kool Aid - Oh Ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Photo_10_small
Percy Harvin and the 2012-13 Passing Game
Small
Jarred Allan VS DeMarcus Ware
It-could-work_small
Wait.....What? The MN Supreme Court Has To OK The Stadium?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Minnesota-vikings-logo_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall