Memorabilia Tax Could Boost Vikings Stadium Efforts
One of the overwhelming cries from people that are against a new stadium for the Minnesota Vikings is that it should be paid for "by the people that will use it." According to the Minnesota Department of Revenue, it looks like the majority of state-provided funds for a new stadium would be raised in just that way.
The Vikings' stadium bill proposes a 10% tax on wholesale sales of sports memorabilia anywhere in the state of Minnesota. Not just on Vikings' merchandise, either. . .rather, it will be a tax on sports merchandise licensed by pretty much any professional sports league. Everything from the NFL and Major League Baseball all the way down to things that don't have a regular presence in Minnesota, such as NASCAR and World Wrestling Entertainment.
The current funding structure of the stadium bill calls for the $700 to $900 million price tag to be split three ways. . .one-third from the team, one-third from the state, and one-third from a yet-to-be-determined local partner. The Revenue Department projects that of the $29.5 million the state would have to contribute in 2015, approximately $17.6 million would come from the memorabilia tax. The rest would come from the following sources:
• $7.8 million from a 5 percent surcharge on the income that Vikings players and their opponents make when playing in the new stadium;
• $2.1 million from a special Vikings-themed lottery game;
• $1.39 million from a 6.5 percent sales tax on direct satellite TV services, including DVR;
• $650,000 from a 6.5 percent sales tax on suite, box seat and sky box rentals at the new stadium.
Again, biased though I might be, I like this idea. A lot of the people that are going to buy sports merchandise are going to be fans of the team or people with, at the very least, an interest in seeing the Vikings stay in Minnesota. Short of taxing things like hotel rooms and rental cars, which I suppose would still be an additional possibility, this would pass the cost primarily on to the people that would get usage out of the stadium, not to mention all of the other events that would end up taking place at the new stadium, up to and including one of the upcoming Super Bowls.
Now, if the team would just stop screwing around and find themselves a local partner. . .you know, like Ramsey County, since (as Skol Girl so ably pointed out) they're the only ones that seem to be showing any real, genuine interest in this whole thing. . .they might actually have a snowball's chance of getting this thing passed.
(Hat tip to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune for this story.)
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Funding sources look good to me...
I understand that the “infrastructure” isn’t there in Ramsey County, but really, I look, and their county commisioners are really serious about bringing the Vikings there. I know this is about making money, but for a county that’s willing to front almost $300 million, you can’t go wrong with that…
Just get it done in Minnesota, one way or the other.
I'm still a Minnesotan at heart...
Infrastructure seems like a Minneapolis-based reason not to take Ramsey County seriously.
To anyone who has driven around downtown Minneapolis lately, I dare you to tell me how great the so-called infrastructure is. On a recent trek to Minneapolis to see the Titian exhibit at MIA, we just about discovered underground parking the potholes were so bad, on and off ramps to the freeway were crumbly, short, and inadequate. I was unimpressed—seriously, if infrastructure is the selling point with Minneapolis, then it should be good. If Ramsey County were to become the site for a new Vikings stadium, its priority for upgraded infrastructure would go up as well.
Life being what it is, one dreams of revenge.
- Paul Gauguin
Player use tax
I wonder how many other publicly assisted stadiums mandate a player and coach use tax? That would be a detractor to free agent players coming to Minnesota knowing that they will be losing 5% of their salary versus a player on another team that does not have the extra tax burden. Players [some at least] do look at such things.
It could also be viewed as the interest paid on a business loan given by the rest of us taxpayers so that they can collectively have a place to work. At this point, you couldn’t say it is all about the greedy owners because the players and the fans would have invested in the structure via the taxes that they pay. Not a bad deal for the state when you think about it. They will eventually get all the money they loan and take from us and make a profit just like they did with the Metrodome and in 40 years whine about it again.
It may take a village to raise a child, but it takes a Viking to raze a village.
Ooooooh...
That’s a REALLY good question/ point. Hmmm. I wonder myself now as well… dang, I’d try and look it up, but I haven’t a clue where I’d even start to find such information.
Ah, the failed attempt at returning Moss home. It was like '98 and '09 were about to make sweet, sweet love and give us a glorious '10 child.
www.dailynorseman.com- THE place for true Viking fanatics.

by 
























