Vikings' Coach Leslie Frazier Clarifies Comments About Quarterbacks
The prevailing wisdom is that the Vikings are going to be selecting a quarterback with one of their first two picks in the 2011 NFL Draft. Recently, in the Star Tribune, Coach Leslie Frazier seemed to backtrack on that a bit.
As for a comment he made at the owners meetings last month in New Orleans about potentially taking a quarterback in the first two rounds, Frazier said:
"The only thing I was saying about that is that would be ideal. That’s the term I used. But you don’t want to get to the point where you’re reaching for a player just because you have what you perceive as a need at quarterback. We want to get the best player that’s available and if the quarterback we like is not there you can’t just say, ‘OK, we’re going to take that guy because he plays quarterback.’ We have other needs other than that position. We’ve got to be smart. … When we sit down and go through all the scenarios we’re going to try to take the best player that’s available for us at whatever spot we take him."
So, basically, the Vikings can take a quarterback in the first two rounds. . .or not take a quarterback in the first two rounds. . .or take a quarterback whenever they darn well please. . .and can claim that they got the guy they wanted.
As I've said on more than one occasion, I'm not an uber draft guru or anything like that, but I can see eight quarterbacks that could be taken in the first two rounds of the draft that really wouldn't be considered reaches.
The two guys that would probably be worth taking at number 12. . .Missouri's Blaine Gabbert and Auburn's Cam Newton. . .probably won't be there at 12. If they could trade down a bit in the first round, they would probably find themselves in the territory where Washington's Jake Locker, Florida State's Christian Ponder, and Arkansas' Ryan Mallett would be legitimate picks (although I still hope like heck we avoid Locker like the plague). As we get closer to the 43rd pick in the draft, you could start adding names like TCU's Andy Dalton, Iowa's Ricky Stanzi, and Nevada's Colin Kaepernick, although Kaepernick would definitely be more of a long-term project than either Stanzi or Dalton.
I don't think that eight quarterbacks are going to be taken in the draft's first 42 picks, so there is likely going to be somebody that the Vikings could grab at 43 (at the latest) without it being considered a reach. As we sit 25 days away from the NFL draft, nobody can really be sure what the Vikings are going to do. . .and I, for one, kind of like it that way.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
TBH
I always noticed Frazier’s use of the word “ideal” in those quotes, and took it’s meaning just as he’s said above. I’ve heard him say enough times that we’ll probably get a stop-gap vet regardless of what ever other QB we get on roster, so the whole “draft a starter” bit really seemed to emphasize the word “ideal”.
This does give me hope for two reasons. A.) As Chris said above, the less we know about the Vikings draft strategy, the less the other 31 teams know… and that’s a good thing. B.) We won’t go nuts and burn a good draft pick on a QB that doesn’t deserve it. Hopefully, as this quote makes it sound, the Vikes FO is keeping a level head about the matter- yes, we need a QB like a bedouin’s camel needs water, but if water ain’t there, don’t drink the sand. (I just made that up. That was pretty good.)
Ah, the failed attempt at returning Moss home. It was like '98 and '09 were about to make sweet, sweet love and give us a glorious '10 child.
www.dailynorseman.com- THE place for true Viking fanatics.
Stanzi would be a reach at #43 IMO
So would Dalton and Kaepernick. The reason I say this is because my draft philosophy has always been that you must find starters in the first 2 rounds. Neither Stanzi nor Dalton have shown that they could start early in year one, let alone day one.
As far as avoiding anyone like the plague, the only QB I feel like that about is Newton. I would probably avoid Mallet like the swine flu and avoid Kaepernick like mono.
At #12, the only QB I would be excited about is Gabbert. I would be okay with trading down to the early 20’s to pick up Locker. I could live with Mallet at #43 (I already got my flu shot). I would be pretty excited about Ponder at #43, but no earlier than that.
"I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it."
I had my honeymoon in Mexico right as the SwineFlu was going nuts
The resort we stayed at literally closed the day we were leaving. I survived that, but I don’t think I can survive Locker. I was thinking all weekend who he reminded me off and it finally hit me: Eric Crouch.
Skol!
Ouch. Crouch was converted to another position
Skolnick posted a fanshot that uses a different comparison for Locker….drum roll
Steve Young.
"I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it."
I still don't understand the hype for Gabbert but
I would be happy with either him or Locker at #12. Stay away from Newton and Mallett because they have the biggest bust potential due to their character issues and the type of college system they played in. For the other qbs I would wait till the 2nd or third rounds.
by MrFootballguy on Apr 4, 2011 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions
Actually Mallet played in a semi- pro style offense with many plays from under center
But I still don’t really like the kid
"I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it."
frazier is pretty cool, imo
he’s a straight shooter and for him to come out with a “pre-emptive clarification” on the qb comments shows that he is aware of the public perception and savvy enough to nip something in the bud/butt as soon as it shows negative potential.
i’m rootin’ for ya leslie…..and i know you read the daily norseman!!!
in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.

by 





















