Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Vikings' Coach Leslie Frazier Clarifies Comments About Quarterbacks

The prevailing wisdom is that the Vikings are going to be selecting a quarterback with one of their first two picks in the 2011 NFL Draft. Recently, in the Star Tribune, Coach Leslie Frazier seemed to backtrack on that a bit.

As for a comment he made at the owners meetings last month in New Orleans about potentially taking a quarterback in the first two rounds, Frazier said:

"The only thing I was saying about that is that would be ideal. That’s the term I used. But you don’t want to get to the point where you’re reaching for a player just because you have what you perceive as a need at quarterback. We want to get the best player that’s available and if the quarterback we like is not there you can’t just say, ‘OK, we’re going to take that guy because he plays quarterback.’ We have other needs other than that position. We’ve got to be smart. … When we sit down and go through all the scenarios we’re going to try to take the best player that’s available for us at whatever spot we take him."

So, basically, the Vikings can take a quarterback in the first two rounds. . .or not take a quarterback in the first two rounds. . .or take a quarterback whenever they darn well please. . .and can claim that they got the guy they wanted.

As I've said on more than one occasion, I'm not an uber draft guru or anything like that, but I can see eight quarterbacks that could be taken in the first two rounds of the draft that really wouldn't be considered reaches.

The two guys that would probably be worth taking at number 12. . .Missouri's Blaine Gabbert and Auburn's Cam Newton. . .probably won't be there at 12. If they could trade down a bit in the first round, they would probably find themselves in the territory where Washington's Jake Locker, Florida State's Christian Ponder, and Arkansas' Ryan Mallett would be legitimate picks (although I still hope like heck we avoid Locker like the plague). As we get closer to the 43rd pick in the draft, you could start adding names like TCU's Andy Dalton, Iowa's Ricky Stanzi, and Nevada's Colin Kaepernick, although Kaepernick would definitely be more of a long-term project than either Stanzi or Dalton.

I don't think that eight quarterbacks are going to be taken in the draft's first 42 picks, so there is likely going to be somebody that the Vikings could grab at 43 (at the latest) without it being considered a reach. As we sit 25 days away from the NFL draft, nobody can really be sure what the Vikings are going to do. . .and I, for one, kind of like it that way.

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

TBH

I always noticed Frazier’s use of the word “ideal” in those quotes, and took it’s meaning just as he’s said above. I’ve heard him say enough times that we’ll probably get a stop-gap vet regardless of what ever other QB we get on roster, so the whole “draft a starter” bit really seemed to emphasize the word “ideal”.

This does give me hope for two reasons. A.) As Chris said above, the less we know about the Vikings draft strategy, the less the other 31 teams know… and that’s a good thing. B.) We won’t go nuts and burn a good draft pick on a QB that doesn’t deserve it. Hopefully, as this quote makes it sound, the Vikes FO is keeping a level head about the matter- yes, we need a QB like a bedouin’s camel needs water, but if water ain’t there, don’t drink the sand. (I just made that up. That was pretty good.)

Ah, the failed attempt at returning Moss home. It was like '98 and '09 were about to make sweet, sweet love and give us a glorious '10 child.
www.dailynorseman.com- THE place for true Viking fanatics.

by KJSegall on Apr 3, 2011 11:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Stanzi would be a reach at #43 IMO

So would Dalton and Kaepernick. The reason I say this is because my draft philosophy has always been that you must find starters in the first 2 rounds. Neither Stanzi nor Dalton have shown that they could start early in year one, let alone day one.

As far as avoiding anyone like the plague, the only QB I feel like that about is Newton. I would probably avoid Mallet like the swine flu and avoid Kaepernick like mono.

At #12, the only QB I would be excited about is Gabbert. I would be okay with trading down to the early 20’s to pick up Locker. I could live with Mallet at #43 (I already got my flu shot). I would be pretty excited about Ponder at #43, but no earlier than that.

"I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it."

by NMVike on Apr 4, 2011 9:24 AM CDT reply actions  

I had my honeymoon in Mexico right as the SwineFlu was going nuts

The resort we stayed at literally closed the day we were leaving. I survived that, but I don’t think I can survive Locker. I was thinking all weekend who he reminded me off and it finally hit me: Eric Crouch.

Skol!

by DM_Purp on Apr 4, 2011 1:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ouch. Crouch was converted to another position

Skolnick posted a fanshot that uses a different comparison for Locker….drum roll

Steve Young.

"I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it."

by NMVike on Apr 4, 2011 1:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

I still don't understand the hype for Gabbert but

I would be happy with either him or Locker at #12. Stay away from Newton and Mallett because they have the biggest bust potential due to their character issues and the type of college system they played in. For the other qbs I would wait till the 2nd or third rounds.

by MrFootballguy on Apr 4, 2011 4:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually Mallet played in a semi- pro style offense with many plays from under center

But I still don’t really like the kid

"I am patient with stupidity but not with those who are proud of it."

by NMVike on Apr 5, 2011 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

frazier is pretty cool, imo

he’s a straight shooter and for him to come out with a “pre-emptive clarification” on the qb comments shows that he is aware of the public perception and savvy enough to nip something in the bud/butt as soon as it shows negative potential.

i’m rootin’ for ya leslie…..and i know you read the daily norseman!!!

in the future there will be no war...there will only be rollerball.

by jethrophet on Apr 4, 2011 11:12 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
You Can Breathe Slightly Easier
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Secondary
Russian_arms_control_small
Season in Review: Chris Cook's Best and Worst performances in 2011
Biggun_small
1st New Vikes Stadium Image
Small
What got you hooked on the Daily Norseman?

Recent FanPosts

Jg_small
UBVs Special| Trivia! Can you name the Minnesota Vikings Starting QBs?
Small
Roster Analysis: Quarterbacks
Biggun_small
SUCK IT MARTY! - Stadium Passes MPLS 7-6
Imagescaj02y87_small
We get NO RESPECT!
Small
Supplemental Draft and our Safety Situation
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Receivers and Tight ends
Grover_small
Purple Kool Aid - Oh Ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Photo_10_small
Percy Harvin and the 2012-13 Passing Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Minnesota-vikings-logo_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall