Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Should Ponder Start or Sit?

EDIT: I know we've had a lot of debate about this subject already, and will continue to do so, but VikingsForever has done a very nice job with this one, so it's time to move it here. - Chris

                                                     To start or not to start, that is the question:
                                                       Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to wait
                                                       To learn and prepare
                                                       Or to take arms against a sea of doubters
                                                       And by playing prove them wrong

     Usually people find Shakespeare to be rather confusing. However, I think it is quite possible that he is talking about some dude called Christian Ponder  (well, I did change a few words here and there). Shortly after drafting him, Frazier seemed to make it pretty clear that he thought starting Ponder on week one would be the most ideal option. However, because of the prolonged lockout, in recent statements he has appeared to have backed out of this stance and is now considering bringing in a veteran quarterback to mentor Ponder.

     Whether a rookie quarterback benefits more from starting right away or backing up a veteran qb is a very interesting question. It's a decision the Vikings will be forced to make in the near future if the season does start on time. To figure out if it is a good idea to start Ponder right away, I decided to take a look at all the quarterbacks who had ever won a Superbowl and see how there careers started. The stats from this search were very interesting.

  • 15 (52%) did not start any games in their rookie season e.g. Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady, Joe Montana
  • 14 (48%) Played at least one game their rookie season e.g. Ben Roethlisberger, Eli Manning
  • Of the 14 that played, 8 (28% of all the QBs) started their first game e.g. Peyton Manning, John Elway

     Yes you are reading the stats right, though there have been 45 Superbowls, only 29 quarterbacks have won one, which makes for a rather small sample size. I thought about expanding my search to include quarterbacks who made the Superbowl and lost, but then I would have to include Rex Grossman, which made me change my mind.

     Looking at the first two stats it appears as if there is an even divide between the starters and the sitters. However, of the 14 quarterbacks that started during their rookie season only 8 of them started the first game. It  can be noted then  that 72% of Superbowl winning quarterbacks did not start the first game of their rookie season making a nice case that sitting and learning might be a good idea after all, even if it is just for a short time. Now, lets move on past these stats and look at the pros and cons for starting or sitting.

Star-divide

     Sitting and learning

    Aaron Rodgers is the poster-boy for the sitting and waiting camp, after being behind Favre for the first three years of his career he went on to win the Superbowl in his third year as a starter. Though vastly overrated by most of the media you have to admit that he did turn out to be a pretty decent qb.  Though the argument can be made that Favre wasn't a good mentor, at least by watching Favre, Rodger could learn what not to do at the end of a close game, i.e., throw gut wrenching interceptions.

Pros of sitting:

1. gives the quarterback some time to adjust to the pro game.

2. Helps him build up his confidence before he gets a start.

3. Lets the team suck for another year so they can get some linemen to protect him. Lions, Texans, I'm looking at you.

Cons of sitting:

1. If the quarterback turns out to be bad, the team will have wasted several years on him instead of knowing their need to find a different qb right away.

2. The quarterback misses out on valuable game experience.

     Starting during rookie season

     Though Peyton Manning went 3-13 his rookie year he set records for the most touchdowns and passing yards by a rookie. The recent trend for rookie quarterbacks has been to throw them out and let them sink or swim. Joe Flacco, Matt Ryan, and Mark Sanchez all lead their teams to the playoffs their first season making a strong case for those who believe a rookie should be the day one starter or at least have significant playing time as a rookie.

Pros of starting:

1. Lets the team see if the rookie can actually play well, allowing the team to move on to someone else if he can't.

2. Gives the rookie valuable game experience, letting him learn from his mistakes.

Cons of starting:

1. The rookie could get sacked 76 times and have his career screwed up.

2. Could be overwhelmed by the pro game and lose confidence.

     However there is a third option, and before you start wondering how a rookie could both sit and start at the same time let me explain it.

    Personally, I think the answer to the age-old debate over whether or not to start a rookie quarterback is 42 that If you are a quarterback good enough to win a Superbowl, (and that is really the only kind worth having) you are going to play well irregardless of whether or not you start the first game of your rookie season (or any of your rookie season for that matter). If you're good, you are good, if you aren't you are not. We just have to make things so complicated sometimes don't we.

      On a side note,just remember, Peyton Manning went 3-13, Aaron Rodgers went 6-10, a "successful" rookie (or first) season can't be compared to a "successful" season for someone like Tom Brady. So don't spaz out if Ponder doesn't lead us to the Superbowl during year one, that can wait till year two. Anyway, make sure to vote on when you think Ponder should make his first start.

Poll
When should Ponder get his first start?
Week One, the sooner he proves those doubters wrong the better.
404 votes
Midseason, let him watch a few games from the sideline then let him play.
203 votes
Next Season, hey, it worked for Aaron Rodgers.
96 votes
It doesn't matter when he starts, he'll do fine.
131 votes
Never, Joe Webb is is a future hall of famer, let him play.
116 votes

950 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.

Comment 78 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

my vote was for 'when he starts he'll do fine'

just because i think the lockout is hurting majorly. I think Ponder is our guy, and we will do well with him. I don’t think getting some trash heap vet will help his development anymore than getting the game time experience will. Look at the guys that Rodgers and Brady sat behind (Favre and Bledsoe). Proven starters, proven winners, Hall of Famers. Ponder would be sitting behind the likes of Hasselbeck (who wants to be a starter for a few more years) McNabb (same) Kolb (same) or people like Bulger and Orton who have proven they can manage games, and win, but also could lose just as easily. If they were proven winners, they’d still be starting.

when asked by Dan Patrick if his name alluded to not making quick decisions in the pocket, Ponder calmly replied "As crazy as it sounds, my mom's maiden name is actually Superbowlwinner. All one word"

by filbert33 on Jun 10, 2011 1:48 PM CDT reply actions  

Good point about they could both be as equally beneficial.

But weighing the risk/reward, there is much more to lose to him getting beat up physically and mentally his rookie year.

-High Priest: Great Wall of Prophecy, reveal to us God's will that we may blindly obey.
-Priests: [chanting] Free us from thought and responsibility.
-High Priest: We shall read things off you.
-Priests: [chanting] Then do them.
-High Priest: Your words guide us.
-Priests: [chanting] We're dumb.

by Edgecrusher71 on Jun 16, 2011 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

You ned a new answer,

whatever Trent the dent Dilwad didn’t do. I’m not sure how I it happens but he continually makes me dislike him more and more everytime he opens his mouth. I think with the lockout ponder will have a tough time understanding what is going on with the playbook and the speed of the game. As well having to deal with more complex defenses and coverage. If we have a preseason let him go at it day one. If not, then give him a couple of weeks. I would definitely get him some action in his first year though.

Childress gone, TJack gone, new stadium on the way: it's like that Christmas when Santa brought prostitutes!

by Grime on Jun 10, 2011 3:20 PM CDT reply actions  

Ponder is now a Minnesota Viking he’ll get action this year.

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on - Winston Churchill

by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jun 10, 2011 10:44 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Ponder is now a Minnesota Viking he’ll get action this year.

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on - Winston Churchill

by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jun 10, 2011 10:44 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

DAMNIT how do I keep double posting?

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on - Winston Churchill

by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jun 10, 2011 10:46 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

to much cowbell

you need a bit more neu..

Childress gone, TJack gone, new stadium on the way: it's like that Christmas when Santa brought prostitutes!

by Grime on Jun 13, 2011 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bring in a Vet-FA.

This is not a good year for Rookie Coach’s and Rookie QB’s.
Let a Vet-FA come in and get his butt kicked, while the offense adjusts to the new scheme.

by chaosg on Jun 10, 2011 5:18 PM CDT reply actions  

This all depends on varibles that none of us are privy to.

We would need to know how well he is grasping the playbook, how much time he will have working with the first team prior to the start of the season, and if Sidney is coming back.

by Bjorno on Jun 11, 2011 5:19 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Depends on when the strike ends

If it ends in time for him to get a training camp, a chance to work with #1 receivers, a few pre-season games, then throw him in at the deep end against the Chargers.

If it ends a week before regular season starts, bring in McNabb and let McNabb start.

Give Ponder a couple months with a Vikings QB coach and WRs and some experience facing an NFL-caliber defense before expecting great things from him.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Jun 12, 2011 11:51 AM CDT reply actions  

its not a strike

its a lockout ! strike is when employees stop woking to get demands met . lockout is when owners dont allow employees to work because they want demands met.

by skol viking on Jun 16, 2011 10:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Semantics; Because the Words Matter

Ok, you’re right, it’s not a strike. Let’s get real specific :)

The lockout means that the management has locked the players out of team facilities. They can’t get into the gym, the lockerroom, etc. The owners are denying the players access to privileged facilities.

The players can get together on their own time and work out wherever else they want.

Technically the contract between the player’s union and the NFL organization has expired and the union doesn’t allow it’s members participating in any management-sponsored work activities.

So when the NFL imposed the lockout, the NFLPA decertified itself (which tells you how critically important the NFL-created workout facilities are to the players and team), which permitted individual players to step forward and sue the NFL in a class-action suit for violation of anti-trust laws. Which they did.

And now both sides are back at the table and they say that an agreement can be expected within a couple weeks, in time for training camps to go forward.

So, to reword my previous topic….

Depends on when the NFL and whatever replaces the old NFLPA can reach working agreement.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Jun 17, 2011 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

That was a little vague could you detail it a bit more?

Childress gone, TJack gone, new stadium on the way: it's like that Christmas when Santa brought prostitutes!

by Grime on Jun 17, 2011 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ok. When the strike ends. :)

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Jun 18, 2011 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I favor webb and ponder sharing duties.

Joe Webb gets first nod to start the first 2 games so that ponder can get familiar with the process. Ponder takes over 2nd half of game. Games 3 & 4 – Ponder starts, Joe finishes up. Game 5 and on… evaluate game 1-4 results. Wouldn’t hurt to develop both equally because there’s two dynamic playing styles (eg Webb can do things Ponder cant and vice versa). This creates logistical nightmare and prepartion problems for any team facing the Vikings. Keep em guessing.

The problem with Farve in 2010 was opponents had some idea what to expect and the unpredictability of the first season was gone. The most telling stat in Farve’s Season 1 and 2 with Vikings is the 3rd down success rate. I cant find this conversion % stat but yahoo says 3rd down QB rating in 2010 was 59.4 vs 94.4 in 2009. A huge difference which is the fundamental reason why we did not make the playoffs.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/1025/situational;_ylt=AsmyfaL6.WFq726IXCcIxLL.uLYF

This QB rating and 3rd down success rate stats can be useful for an objective Webb & Ponder evaluation. The vikings cannot be known as a 2 down team and give opponents confidence when 3rd down advantage is in their favor.

Ok. after some further research, here it is:
http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/downs
Vikings in 2010 – 34.5% success rate on 3rd downs, ranked 24th of teams, did not make playoffs. In 2010, there were many close games. Just converting on a handful of these 3rd downs could have made the Viking’s year far more successful, particularly against the division rivals.
Vikings in 2009 – 44.8% success rate on 3rd downs, ranked 5th of all teams, made playoffs.

Stats simplified.

by VikesFanSince1967 on Jun 12, 2011 2:27 PM CDT reply actions  

Here's some numbers...

A chart about Ponder against the blitz vs. against no blitz and his numbers on 3rd down. Remember he was hurt in 2010, so 2009 has better numbers to go along with a much larger sample size. Check them out…
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/27416/vikings-christian-ponder-under-pressure
I think he’ll be just fine on 3rd down…

by mak07 on Jun 12, 2011 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dual-QB Offense

In theory it can work really well, it has all the advantages you listed. But on the down-side, each QB gets half as many reps in practice and in game time/starts. We have two new guys in Ponder and Webb, and I’m thinking that both of them need as much face-time as possible.

You’ve been a fan about as long as me so you’ll recall some of the Vikings’ QB shuttles, about 14 years of dual QBs and mostly mediocre results (only 2 non-WC play off appearances). Granted, this period includes the Les Steckle debacle, but the philosophy of rotating the QBs was pretty consistent throughout.

Kramer & Dils
Kramer & Wilson
Gannon & Wilson
Gannon & Salisbury
McMahon & Salisbury

Not period of Viking history that makes me shout for joy.

I do believe it can work, but I think it would work best if both QBs have some experience before being put on limited snaps.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Jun 13, 2011 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey Les Steckle wasn't bad

he was just very very very not good.

Kramer still makes me want to cry though.

Childress gone, TJack gone, new stadium on the way: it's like that Christmas when Santa brought prostitutes!

by Grime on Jun 13, 2011 12:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

So let me ask you this...

How many of those offenses listed ran the WCO?

by Bjorno on Jun 22, 2011 7:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

We don't run the WCO

anymore either… We now run the Erhardt offense… But I think it should be Ponder right away and all year long…

by mak07 on Jun 22, 2011 7:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

And if I am not mistaken...

The erhardt-perkins offense is what spawned the WCO and it still heavily relies on timing. Timing is built through repetition and having two different QB’s messes with that timing.

by Bjorno on Jun 23, 2011 6:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

ponder is an unsigned rookie who has only met the coach once.

and hasn’r even attended a rookie symposium, rookie camp, ota or mini-camp. nobody knows what is going to happen with the lock-out, training camp or even the season. who knows, he might end up holding out on signing his contract even after training camp begins. you or i just don’t know.

“should ponder sit or start?”….how can this question possibly be answered in a reasonable fashion?

all i can say is that he is going to be a whole lot less prepared to start in his first nfl season than any qb ever drafted. and it would probably be wise to get him signed and showing up for work every day before trying to make him the starter. he seems like he is capable of handling the pressure and is probably as prepared as you can expect a college qb to be, but nobady knows how he will handle things once actual football begins.

i favor the “let’s wait a little bit before throwing him in” approach due to the circumstances of this season.
i hope we get a vet in here for the short term starter/mentor role.

by danny lloyd on Jun 12, 2011 7:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Depends on whether or not you guys sign a veteran. If you don’t, then I think Ponder kind of has to start. Otherwise, it might be hard to justify starting Webb over him, especially because Ponder was/is considered by many probably the most pro ready of any guy in this year’s class. But if you sign a solid veteran, I could understand playing that veteran and letting Ponder get some experience and studying under his belt.

Fire Slocum

by packallday555 on Jun 15, 2011 1:40 AM CDT reply actions  

+1 to that

If Chicago is your first game of the year, Ponder might just get shelled out there from Peppers. I am not sure you want to see the future QB getting hit hard by him, just ask us Lions fans about Peppers and first games. Not a good site to see.

How many lumps you want Doc?

by davis0169 on Jun 15, 2011 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Honestly

I’d be more concerned about your Lions’ defensive line than the Bears.

by Mebera on Jun 17, 2011 3:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's the Question.

Should the Vikings bring in a Vet-FA, or should they go with Ponder in wk #1 ?

by chaosg on Jun 15, 2011 11:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

As a fan you want to see you new guy out there

I know we wanted to see Stafford on day 1 but then well you know all about how he has not seen a full season yet so that’s the down side. I think Ponder could handle it IF he gets a full training camp and pre-season. Cut any of that time out and I would not want to see him out there if I was a vikings fan.

How many lumps you want Doc?

by davis0169 on Jun 15, 2011 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's kinda what I'm thinking.

With no OTA’s, Ponder and Frazier are already behind……with new coaching and a new playbook, that’s makes the whole team behind schedule.

I say bring in a vet-fa and let him take the beating while the team learns the new playbook.
Ponder can learn from the sideline, and if he seems able to handle the job around mid-season, then great. But I don’t think I would start Ponder in wk 1…..IMO.

by chaosg on Jun 15, 2011 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I trust Leslie Frasier

If he thinks Ponder has grasped the offense better and we’ll win more games with him, I trust him. And vice versa with Webb.

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on - Winston Churchill

by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jun 15, 2011 9:39 PM CDT via mobile reply actions   1 recs

I think the ship has sailed for the concept of Webb

Webb is too young and talented to really have a good shot either in the short or long term for the Vikings….unless something really goes wrong on the QB front. I know this this a very odd statement but, but hear me out.

I think it’s fair to say that the type of game that Joe Webb will bring as a QB and the type of game that Christian Ponder will bring as a QB are very different. Teams will game plan for them differently, the plays that are available to the offense will be different, and type of play that each QB will bring to the field will be different. In short, they are going to be different quarterbacks.

Despite this, both are young and could have pretty good careers. Each one could be formed into something a franchise could be proud of. Ponder will be a bit more of the traditional leader under center….Webb will be something more akin to Vick or maybe Steve Young…or dare I say Fran Tarkenton? Either way he’ll be that guy who can kill with feet and arm. If both progress both will be looking to be starters. There is only one starting job in MN.

Thus the problem comes into view. The added complication is that now the front office has made a bit of a wager on Ponder. He’s their guy. Put another way, if Ponder doesn’t turn out then they don’t look good. Now if Ponder doesn’t turn out because they found a different guy the damage to that is minimal, but they still don’t look that great.

No, Ponder is the future of the Vikings for better or worse. He needs to be. The question here is who needs to be present. It could be Ponder….it could be a vet….it probably shouldn’t be Webb though. Webb is just inexperienced enough that if he doesn’t do well then a very reasonable question is why didn’t the Vikings just run Ponder out there. After all, if the Vikings were going to put up with a struggling QB then why go with the guy who is the future of the team and let him learn things the hard way? It gets even worse if Webb does well though because if Webb does well he’s young enough that a true QB controversy arises…..there will be a legitimate question of whether Ponder should of even been drafted in the first place.

No, Webb isn’t the guy….at least not here. Now if he changes position then it’s a different ball game. Then he could have a great career in MN, but at this point it’s doubtful that there is much future for him as a QB.

by PackApologist on Jun 16, 2011 1:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

hey he could be second string!

Wait I agree with you. Better to be on the field than off of it in my opinion.

Childress gone, TJack gone, new stadium on the way: it's like that Christmas when Santa brought prostitutes!

by Grime on Jun 16, 2011 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

That all depends on Joe.

If he improves and out-plays Ponder, he will be the guy. Period.

Football is about winning, not about playing the guy you drafted and paid a butt-load of money just to save face. Winning absolves you of any mistake you have made in this game. Vick is a prime example. A mere 2 years ago, most of the fans had absolute HATE for the guy. Now that he is a winner, things are looking much more rosey for #7.

Ponder does have the edge, but that does not mean Joe is relegated to automatic #2 duties. If he gives us the best chance to win, he will be under center…. or about 5 steps behind center depending on how we play him,

by Bjorno on Jun 22, 2011 7:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

man I'm not so sure about that..

I mean how many times do you see a 6th round guy even get a chance to beat out a first round pick? Especially at QB. Now Webb has a strong following amongst the fans mostly because he wasn’t TJ and we needed hope. But there is a financial consideration you are dealing with as well as expectations of what a first round pick can be if not in his first year then in his second and third when he grows into his position.

Childress gone, TJack gone, new stadium on the way: it's like that Christmas when Santa brought prostitutes!

by Grime on Jun 23, 2011 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

It doesn't matter how many times we have seen it happen...

It only matters how well he plays, his draft position is irrelevant. Any player on the team has the same value if they play at the same level whether they were drafted in the first round or undrafted.

Are you going to say that Tom Brady is somehow worth less to the patriots because he was drafted in the 6th round? What about John Randle? He was undrafted and is probably in the top 3 DT’s to ever play the game.

These are just examples, I am by no means comparing Joe to Brady or Randle. But their rise to football greatness shows that, while unlikely, it is very possible for a talent like that to slip to the later rounds. And to believe that guys with skills like these would stay on the bench in favor of someone drafted 5 rounds earlier is just silly.

Again, Ponder does have a slight edge, but if he outplays Ponder and we don’t draft a veteran starter, Webb will start.

by Bjorno on Jun 23, 2011 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Actually no I guess what I was trying to say didn't come across correctly.

I was not trying to say that certain people are better than other based on the draft (although you certainly could) but they do have a different base of expectation from the coach. Honestly I don’t think you can tell me differently, they are going to be paying Ponder more than Webb, the fan base will be expecting more from Ponder than Webb, based on scouting reports ponder should have a higher ceiling than Webb.

There are good reasons why people are drafted early and late. When someone slips to the 6th round as a QB there have to be a lot of people making mistakes or he would be picked earlier. So yeah the Brady 6th round pick does happen but this isn’t a random thing here, there is a lot thought going on and because of that it makes sense to realize that and expect it to pan out.

Not sure if that made sense.. Most likely not.

Childress gone, TJack gone, new stadium on the way: it's like that Christmas when Santa brought prostitutes!

by Grime on Jun 24, 2011 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, if I read you right we are basically agreeing...

Ponder does have higher expectations, from both the coach and the fans. But that does not give him an automatic “In” especially with a shortened off-season.

Joe fell to the 6th round because of his projection as a WR in the NFL and his showing at the Senior Bowl. Nobody was going to use a high-round pick on a guy who has played 7 games at WR in college, regardless of his athleticism.

Had he stayed course and was drafted as a QB, he might have seen some looks in the higher rounds ala Colin Kaepernick. But that is pure speculation.

I think Frazier knows that we have a short window in which to be a winning team, and he is going to put forth the best product, regardless of who they are.

I still think that neither Ponder nor Webb will start this year.

by Bjorno on Jun 25, 2011 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think Frazier knows that we have a short window in which to be a winning team…

if that is his mindset, then i am worried. i don’t want another “short window, built to win now” mentality. i want him to build a solid team for the long haul. one that uses an 8-8 season as a rebuilding year. so we can be solid, year in and year out…
like belichek does.

by danny lloyd on Jun 27, 2011 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ok, well I should clarify...

We have a short window where we still have AP, Jared Allen, Kevin Williams, EJ Henderson, Visanthe Shiancoe and Hutch.

I don’t care how good of a HC you are, those are tough players to replace.

by Bjorno on Jun 27, 2011 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good write up!
I thought about expanding my search to include quarterbacks who made the Superbowl and lost, but then I would have to include Rex Grossman, which made me change my mind.

HAHAH CLASSIC!

I can’t honestly vote. It depends how much time he can get in training camp. If it goes where there is barely any training camp that has to be factored in and I would imagine Rookies that started there Rookie season and have won a Super Bowl probably got a full off season training camp.

Shogun Rua, still only 1 quality win in the UFC and I don't want to hear any garbage excuses about his knee. That is all.

by Edgecrusher71 on Jun 16, 2011 10:11 AM CDT reply actions  

Though the argument can be made that Favre wasn’t a good mentor, at least by watching Favre, Rodgers could learn what not to do at the end of a close game, i.e., throw gut wrenching interceptions.

Its a good thing Rodgers didnt see Favre punt an interception to lose in an OT playoff game then ;-)

by redhearring on Jun 16, 2011 10:32 AM CDT reply actions  

Redo the poll

Before the first game of the season, I think minds will change if/when training camp begins and if we acquire a vet.

by redhearring on Jun 16, 2011 10:33 AM CDT reply actions  

Lastly
On a side note,just remember, Peyton Manning went 3-13, Aaron Rodgers went 6-10

If hes going to suck regardless of how long we wait, shouldnt we throw him in? IN the Rodgers model, we will be waiting six years.

by redhearring on Jun 16, 2011 10:35 AM CDT reply actions  

also remember

Sanchez took his team to the AFC Championship game (on the back of his defense and good running game .. sound familiar)
and Matt Ryan took his team to the playoffs (also on a good defense and running game)

when asked by Dan Patrick if his name alluded to not making quick decisions in the pocket, Ponder calmly replied "As crazy as it sounds, my mom's maiden name is actually Superbowlwinner. All one word"

by filbert33 on Jun 16, 2011 1:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Filbert

Neither of those teams that you just spoke of let the QB air it out either. Now I’m not saying your new regime is going to let Ponder try and win every game, but as long as they stay true to a run first and only have Ponder MANAGE the game he could do very fine. Something else about the 2 QB’s you named, they had bye-weeks in their divisions unlike the Vikes who have to see 6 hard-nosed D’s in the division. Matty ice didn’t have to face any team his rookie year that had ANY kind of defense, the Saints/Buc’s/Panthers were all on the crappier end of the stat line. Dirty Sanchez faced who? The Patriots? Well at least they had offense but NO D, the Phins were horrible and so were the Bills. The North has 4 teams in it that have top tier pass rushers in it, all 3 other teams have QB’s that can win games and it’s just going to be a lot harder for any team in this division to win it this year regardless of who you root for. I mean you can make a case for all 4 teams as to why they could win not only the division but the entire conference, if not another SB.

How many lumps you want Doc?

by davis0169 on Jun 16, 2011 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just giving an example

I don’t think Ponder will light up the field. I think Musgrave will keep a short passing attack and let AP do what he does. I think Ponder will fall somewhere between the NFC championship and 3-13. I’d like to see Ponder go 9-7 or 10-6. Though i dont think that will be good enough to make the playoffs. but once in the playoffs, all bets are off. I think 8-8 or better would be a successful season considering everything this team has dug out of over the last few years cough favre cough

when asked by Dan Patrick if his name alluded to not making quick decisions in the pocket, Ponder calmly replied "As crazy as it sounds, my mom's maiden name is actually Superbowlwinner. All one word"

by filbert33 on Jun 16, 2011 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I do think all 4 of the teams in this division could win it all

We all have the ingredients to succeed, Stellar D’s, the Pack don’t run but the Bears do, and hopefully my Lions can say the same thing now that we have Best and Mikel on the roster, I don’t think I have to mention AP on this site but you guys can certainly run, and IF Gerhart can make that next step in his second year, anything could happen in this division this year. I do think the NFC North could put 3 teams into the playoffs this year.But that depends on how much we beet up on each other when divisional games are played. we could all go 3-3 in the division this year. Or 1 team could go 6-0. I mean who saw the Bears winning the division last year? (outside of chicago that is)

How many lumps you want Doc?

by davis0169 on Jun 16, 2011 6:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

Manning may have went 3-13 BUT

He also threw for 3,739 yards and 26 TD’s.Manning also had one of the most versatile RB;s to ever play in Marshal Faulk and he also had Marvin Harison. Ponder in NO WAY should be compared to a guy who had the #‘s that Manning had coming out of college when Ponder could not even get FSU to the top of division. Ponder should do well if given time, because he has the same luxury that Ben had his first year as a QB; A very good running game. Manning had the pedigree of his dad’s knowledge and a 4 years starting career in Tennessee, Ponder was not as lucky at FSU. If the lock-out ends and he gets a good training camp in he will do fine, well as fine as a new QB with a new OC and HC can do. The Vikes are in the same ship as almost every other rookie QB that was drafted is in.The only difference for Ponder is he is playing in a division that has some of the elite pass rushers in it. In Chicago you have Peppers and those damn LB’s, in GB you have a 3-4 system that has turned Mathews into a monster, and you can only assume that having another year under their belt in GB that the entire D will be better this year; Then in Detroit you have the emergence of one of the scariest D-lines in the game; with KVB on the edge and SUH with possibly Fairley as well in the middle, it could be a very hard learning curve for Ponder if the O-line does not do a better job than it did last year.

How many lumps you want Doc?

by davis0169 on Jun 16, 2011 4:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

"Ponder could not even get FSU to the top of the division"

Resident FSU fan here. What are you talking about? He won his division his senior year and played about 10 minutes in the conference championship game. Please get all the facts before posting nonsence.

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on - Winston Churchill

by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jun 16, 2011 6:33 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

conference

How many lumps you want Doc?

by davis0169 on Jun 16, 2011 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

?

Virginia Tech, Clemson, Maryland, B.C., N.C., and N.C. State were all solid teams last year. But I suppose every conference not named “SEC” is average.

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on - Winston Churchill

by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jun 16, 2011 6:49 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

yeah that kills me.

It seems odd that for the last few years, the officiating in the SEC has kind of played favorites with the darling of the year team in that conference. Florida was given big time breaks with Tebow 3 years ago, Alabama 2 years ago got big help in staying undefeated, and Auburn saw the same luxury last year. If those Zebra’s would call a straight game they would not have had undefeated teams the last handful of years. And I can’t really talk about a average conf. when the Big 10 has not been all that good as of late either.

How many lumps you want Doc?

by davis0169 on Jun 17, 2011 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

Excuse me VikingsForever, but

IRREGARDLESS IS NOT A WORD!

Thank you.

by bazinwanga on Jun 16, 2011 3:41 PM CDT reply actions  

From your first link

“The word dates back to the 19th century, but is regarded as incorrect in standard English”.

by PurpleX on Jun 16, 2011 5:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree that irregardless is nonstandard. In formal writing such as a reseach paper irregardless would be improper to use along with stuff like slang or most pronouns. thankfuly blog writing and most sports writing does not have any of those restrictions. :)

by VikingsForever on Jun 16, 2011 7:21 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

I agree that irregardless is nonstandard. In formal writing such as a reseach paper irregardless would be improper to use along with stuff like slang or most pronouns. thankfuly blog writing and most sports writing does not have any of those restrictions. :)

by VikingsForever on Jun 16, 2011 7:26 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Oops double post im on vacation and the wifi is going on/off all the time. There should be a way to delete your own comments or something.

by VikingsForever on Jun 16, 2011 7:29 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Word.

Childress gone, TJack gone, new stadium on the way: it's like that Christmas when Santa brought prostitutes!

by Grime on Jun 23, 2011 11:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

I have to disagree with you...

Plenty of “words” are used incorrectly and that does NOT make them a word. “Supposably” is very commonly used incorrectly instead of “supposedly”, that does not automatically make it a word. And you may never “axe” me a question, again, very common, but the only axe I know of chops wood.

by bazinwanga on Jun 29, 2011 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

okey is not a word, dokey is not a word...

but okey-dokey sure seems like one a dem der words, eh?

by danny lloyd on Jun 29, 2011 7:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

well...

Directly from the link from oxford you posted.

Usage
Irregardless means the same as regardless, but the negative prefix ir- merely duplicates the suffix -less, and is unnecessary. The word dates back to the 19th century, but is regarded as incorrect in standard English

And thanks for actually responding & not taking my criticism personally! I’m all about healthy debate.

by bazinwanga on Jun 29, 2011 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Greetings people of the

DNM, from MCM.
In my opinion as what i said with our rookie qb Jake Locker let him sit until midseason if we bring a Vet QB or Kerry Coktails Collins back.

If Cocktail goes on another 0-3, 0-4, 0-5, or 0-6 streak he’s outta here to the bench and i’d like to See Jake start.

idk if any of you think the same or similar on your Christian as well

by Ice0ne (CAJ) on Jun 16, 2011 5:02 PM CDT reply actions  

It depends...

As it stands right now, I would start him. But if we sign a McNabb-type veteran, we’ll have some options. Let the vet start until the season is lost (which won’t be long) then put Ponder in there for some on the job experience.

by Bodysuit Man on Jun 16, 2011 6:02 PM CDT reply actions  

This might actually be the best year to start right away

Lets not forget, defenses aren’t getting the reps in either, and they will be just as rusty. If he has a knack for soaking in knowledge faster then previous rookies or quarterbacks we had this might be a slight advantage. Getting used to the game speed doesn’t help when your on the bench, so I like to take that out of the factor. Until your starting a regular season game, even if you have front row seats, you can’t FEEL the game speed unless your in there.

I’m not going to say start him, because its a competition, and if Webb comes out of the gates in what we hope will be a pre-season then he should start. We won’t know until that happens so i’ll hold my breathe.

by PurpleJesuZ on Jun 16, 2011 6:23 PM CDT reply actions  

Do you really think that way?

Usually it’s the Defense’s that come out of the gate on fire because every offense needs the timing down with QB and WR and the O-lines seem to always be behind the 8 ball so to say when the seasons start.

How many lumps you want Doc?

by davis0169 on Jun 16, 2011 6:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Both should be rusty

Hence all of the false start, offsides, and encroachment calls at the beginning of every season.

A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on - Winston Churchill

by Alittlemore_cowbell on Jun 16, 2011 6:53 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

That's awesome for you guys.

To actually get to talk to your OC like that. That thred is the first REAL football I have got to read in months. I am curious though, how did you get in touch with your OC? Twitter? regardless of how, that is something to get you Vikings fans pumped up about. after reading that interview it seems like Ponder should get the start from day 1, I mean basically running the same kind of offense at FSU, jumping to this level should be a little easier than what Cam will have to learn.

How many lumps you want Doc?

by davis0169 on Jun 17, 2011 4:18 PM CDT reply actions  

Ted has been stalking hot celebs for years

He’s using all the detective skills he’s aquired from that and turned to stalking the Viking management instead. I believe I heard that Ted wrote his request on the mans toilet paper dispenser at Musgraves house..

With admins like these…

Childress gone, TJack gone, new stadium on the way: it's like that Christmas when Santa brought prostitutes!

by Grime on Jun 22, 2011 11:40 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Haha perfect

Rec’d. I laughed pretty hard at that.

by mak07 on Jun 22, 2011 7:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
You Can Breathe Slightly Easier
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Secondary
Russian_arms_control_small
Season in Review: Chris Cook's Best and Worst performances in 2011
Biggun_small
1st New Vikes Stadium Image
Small
What got you hooked on the Daily Norseman?

Recent FanPosts

Jg_small
UBVs Special| Trivia! Can you name the Minnesota Vikings Starting QBs?
Small
Roster Analysis: Quarterbacks
Biggun_small
SUCK IT MARTY! - Stadium Passes MPLS 7-6
Imagescaj02y87_small
We get NO RESPECT!
Small
Supplemental Draft and our Safety Situation
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Receivers and Tight ends
Grover_small
Purple Kool Aid - Oh Ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Photo_10_small
Percy Harvin and the 2012-13 Passing Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Minnesota-vikings-logo_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall