Point/Counterpoint: No Reason To Throw Ponder Into This Mess
As Ted stated in his article just below this one, we got into a bit of a disagreement after today's game about which direction the Vikings should go at the quarterback position. Not an angry disagreement, mind you, largely because. . .well, between the Gophers' game on Saturday and the Vikings' game yesterday, we're simply too freaking depressed to be angry. But we do have different ideas as to which way the Vikings should go given the epic. . .whatever you'd classify this as that we've seen over the past three weeks.
Ted thinks that we should put Christian Ponder in at quarterback and just roll with him for the rest of the season. . .and don't get me wrong, I'm as anxious to see what #7 has as anybody else. I can understand why people want to see Donovan McNabb grabbing a spot on the bench and putting Ponder (or even Joe Webb) behind center for what is quickly becoming a lost season.
I'm here to say that I disagree. Here's why.
Donovan McNabb is not going to be the starting quarterback of the Minnesota Vikings in 2012. I know this, you know this. . .hell, even Donovan McNabb knows this. He's here on a one-year deal, and he's simply keeping the seat warm for Christian Ponder. At some point, McNabb has to say to himself, "Hey, if I want to play past this season, I'd better start performing a hell of a lot better than I am right now." At which point he'll either step up his game or wind up getting a forced retirement from the National Football League.It also stands to reason that this team is not without talent, even on offense. This team has the best running back in the National Football League in Adrian Peterson, a dynamic playmaker in Percy Harvin, a pretty good backup in Toby Gerhart, a really underrated possession option in Michael Jenkins, and a pretty darn good group of tight ends. If the Vikings can solidify their offensive line, they can be a very good offense for 2012 and beyond.
Which is why I don't want to see Ponder spending this season getting his ass handed to him and losing a ton of games as Minnesota's starting quarterback in 2011.
In the Air Force, and I'm sure in other walks of life as well, we often talk about "setting people up for success." Putting Ponder in at quarterback for the Vikings this season, in my opinion, would have a greater potential of setting him up for failure than for success. Sure, there are rookie quarterbacks that come in and play well right away, and there's a chance that Ponder can be one of those guys. There's also a chance that if we put him back there behind this offensive line, he's going to turn into David Carr v2.0, and simply be too shell shocked to reach his full potential at the National Football League level.
Like I said, I like Christian Ponder a lot, and think that he's going to be the best quarterback that the Vikings have "home grown" since that Tarkenton fellow. Had he gotten an entire off-season like he normally would have had the lockout not happened and been able to get the amount of attention prior to Training Camp that he should have, I would probably feel differently about throwing him to the wolves as our starting quarterback. But, quite frankly, if somebody is going to spend the 2011 season getting their asses handed to them while the Vikings end up having a below-average season anyway. . .quite frankly, I would rather it be Donovan McNabb.
Let Ponder spend this whole season learning on the sideline, spend your first couple of picks in the 2012 NFL Draft on a real franchise left tackle (and by "franchise," I mean "won't show up to Training Camp weighing 600 pounds") and a deep threat that's actually a threat (since next season we won't have to put up with Bernard Berrian any longer, either), and then plug Ponder into the offense when there are more pieces in place.
That's my take on it, anyway.
41 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Frazier isn't going to change qb's
at this point in the season. Frazier and Mcnabb go back to their philly days and out of respect for mcnabb I think he’ll stick with him at least until the midway point of the season.
Frazier In Philly? mean Chilly?
When was Leslie Frazier in Philly?
by DelawareBerserker on Sep 26, 2011 4:45 PM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions
WEBB
I think we should give Webb a shot. Allow Ponder continue to study the game and lets put Webb in. Lets say Webb actually makes somthing happen and proves his value as starter/great back up. Then seriously consider other options outside the organization. With this group of coaches players will never live up to their potential anyways. More importantly this season is already lost so make the changes at the very top all the way down to the coaches and start over now.
+1
"Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve."
George Bernard Shaw
"In those days the best painkiller was ice; it wasn't addictive and it was particularly effective if you poured some whiskey over it."
George Burns
by just another viking on Sep 26, 2011 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions
Agreed
I see no reason to dump Ponder into this mess, either.
From what I’ve seen of Webb, he’s someone with the passion and skills to win. Unlike T-Jack or McNabb, he will do whatever it takes and is cool under pressure.
If Vikings Management was smart they would develop both Ponder and Webb and then have the ability to get major $$$$ for either one to improve other positions. This thing about bringing in McNabb just cost us the ability to pay for some much-needed help at some of the other positions.
by liveforadrenaline on Sep 26, 2011 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions
he looked a lot like T-Jack last year
The question for Webb, as it was for Jackson, was whether he can make accurate throws. The answer last year was not consistently.
This thing about bringing in McNabb just cost us the ability to pay for some much-needed help at some of the other positions.
that’s not true at all. he costs $5.5million. that is a total bargain for a guy like him. we just potentially saved ponder’s and webb’s careers by giving them a little time to adjust to a brand new coaching staff, system and set of receivers after a lock out where they had zero time to work with the team in the offseason. it was money well spent for the short term, this is on the o-line and coaching, imo.
warcraft, you are my guitar hero !!!
YES on WEBB
I see a Joe Kapp in this guy………….Give him a chance,,
On the one hand
I can envision very little changing since it will be the same gameplan, Oline and lack of a real downfield WR no matter who the QB is. But on the other, rolling out and having the added threat of a running QB might help more than we think.
Webb or Ponder either one will bring more to the table than McNabb is showing us. I think the guy is finished. But Frazier and Musgrave need to seriously come up with something a little more creative to keep the defense guessing. We’re making it real easy on the defense with these short passes. Tarvaris Jackson could have done that, so what do we need McNabb for?
I’m not really seeing a difference between the former regime and the current one to be honest.
Send a message...
Start the second team offensively to start the second half. If they succeed, leave’em in.
by 92Y_VikesFan on Sep 26, 2011 7:39 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Okay, I've slept on it and I feel a bit better now.
Also, I agree with Christopher. There is no reason to ruin any chance with Ponder now by “throwing him to the wolves” as people say. Lets just sit back and watch McChub get destroyed every play, thanking God that it isn’t Ponder that is getting flattened.
Face it guys, we knew this wasn’t going to be a winning season. Just try to make it through this season and look toward the draft. April cannot come soon enough.
by christian220896 on Sep 26, 2011 8:42 AM CDT reply actions
Just don't mess it up
The head coach is right, it doesn’t matter who the QB is at this point because that isn’t the problem. If a team loses a double digit leads for 3 weeks in a row then the offense isn’t wholly responsible. With that being said, it’s painfully obvious that McNabb is not the answer for us in the long run. He has nothing left at this point except his past success which won’t help us for the future. I think he’s just happy he’s collecting his paycheck. The real issue here is that we’re in the Andrew Luck lottery and we can’t mess that up. There are 5 teams right now who are 0-3 and 3 of them, including us, need him. I’ve eliminated the Rams as they have Bradford and the Chiefs who have Cassell. That leaves the Colts who has nothing after the aging and quite banged up Peyton Manning and the Dolphins who badly wanted to make a QB change this offseason. I’ve gotta think that Bill Polian is really eyeing the Stanford QB in the upcoming draft, why else would he sign a retired Kerry Collins and keep Curtis Painter, a laughable backup. Ditto for the Dolphins who badly wanted Kyle Orton but wouldn’t pull the trigger over a third round pick.
I think the best option for us is to shore up the defense this season, get Luck in April and go on from there.
What?
I’ve eliminated the Rams as they have Bradford and the Chiefs who have Cassell.
…and us because we have Ponder. You kinda forgot about the 1st round pick in last years draft, huh.
It's about the money
The Rams and the Chiefs have much more money invested in their QBs than we have in Ponder and that they are more established than Ponder. Cassell led the Chiefs to the playoffs last year and Bradford almost got the Rams there.
by Devotedvike on Sep 26, 2011 11:50 AM CDT up reply actions
No way
The offense is almost fully responsible. You can’t expect any defense to be on the field for an entire second half, especially not against a good offense, and still expect to win.
Also, there is no way they spend a second 1st round pick in a row on a QB, and no fan should want them to. High round QBs are very high risk, whereas using that pick on the line or on a WR can be close to a sure thing.
Way
So you’re saying if the Vikes get the number one pick in April, you think that they should pass on Andrew Luck and pick the best OL or WR on the draft board?
by Devotedvike on Sep 26, 2011 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions
They certainly shouldn't pick Luck
Either trade down or pick the best available player who fills a need. They need help everywhere and Luck is no sure thing.
The only way I’d change that opinion is if Ponder get real playing time this year and shows he can’t do it.
Otherwise, you have to use the pieces you have and you can’t afford to gamble away another high pick.
I hope they don't pass over Luck if they have a chance
The QB who is mentioned in the same breath as John Elway when he came out of Stanford and who everyone has graded as high if not as high as Elwa.y. I think if he even comes close to Elway then we are in a great situation. If we get Luck then trade Ponder away for picks
Ponder vs. Luck
While I like Luck, I think Ponder is smarter and is more of a winner. Luck set some passing records but at this point I could care less about passing records and will go with someone who wants to win and has the talent and ability to do so.
I see no reason to jeopardize our whole future by paying huge bucks to just another unproven college prospect. It reminds me of hiring unproven coaches way too much.
by liveforadrenaline on Sep 26, 2011 9:39 AM CDT reply actions
But if the Vikings pick #1
which is where Luck will go, how could you let him go? Every college player is unproven in the NFL, so no matter who you drafted there you would be paying a bunch of money to (although not as much as in years gone by).
We’re a team in transition here and must be able to admit it. There are many older guys at key positions, we have the worst stadium in the NFL and no real prospect of a new one, we could possibly be moving to another city if things don’t turn around, we may even be hiring yet another HC in a year or two. Why not start down the road to rebuilding with the best QB prospect to come out since Payton Manning? Luck is a winner, and no no disrespect to Ponder, but one in their right mind would pick Christian Ponder over Andrew Luck as their franchise QB. No one who is serious about winning at least.
by Bodysuit Man on Sep 26, 2011 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Thats awesome...
You think our draft guys are in their right mind! hahahahhahha
thats priceless….
I dont know if I should warn Erin Rodgers he has a dead cat on his upper lip or just let it hang there till Jared Allen rips it off on 10/23?
On option
Is to trade down. The other option is to pick the best player that fills a need. What doesn’t make any sense is taking another gamble on another QB when you desperate need help on the O-line, at WR and in the defensive backfield.
Also best QB prospect since Manning??
I'm biased
because I’m a Vikes fan and a Stanford fan. But Luck is the real deal. I watched Ponder in a few games last year – there is no comparison. If we can get him, we take him.
Not to mention, Luck currently plays in a pro-style offensive which features a formidable running attack, multiple TE sets, and lacks a true speed receiver (aside from the oft-injured Chris Owusu). Sound familiar?
"Sports don't build character, they reveal it."
by Leland's Axe on Sep 26, 2011 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions
Wouldn't be the first sure thing to miss
And we already used a first round pick on a QB. Unless Ponder plays enough this year to demonstrate he can’t do it, I don’t like using another high pick — that can be used on a for sure multi-year starter at any other position — being gambled on a QB.
Also, lot’s of guys have been great in college and sucked in the NFL, and lots of guys have been okay (or non-existent, ala Brad Johnson) in college and good in the NFL.
Like I said
I’m biased. But virtually every draft expert says he’s the best QB prospect since Manning, and some say he’s the best QB prospect ever (not to say he’ll be the best QB of all time, but that there’s never been another QB as pro-ready coming into the NFL). I understand the reluctance to use another top pick, but it’s a sunken cost fallacy. When you get the chance to draft a once-in-a-decade franchise quarterback, you take him.
Not that I think this will really be a problem for the Vikings. I doubt we’ll end up with anything higher than the sixth or seventh pick. Where, incidentally, we can grab Jonathan Martin, Stanford’s studly left tackle. :)
"Sports don't build character, they reveal it."
by Leland's Axe on Sep 27, 2011 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions
if luck is available to us and we don't take him, then the front office should all be fired.
luck is the sam bradford of next year’s draft. there is no comparison between ponder and bradford or peyton manning. they are not in the same conversation. nothing against those fsu fans who like to roam here now, but andrew luck is a once every ten years kind of prospect. ponder is a more typical qb prospect with much, much, much less upside. if we get a shot at luck, that is like winning the lottery.
warcraft, you are my guitar hero !!!
high praise indeed
Really? Sam Bradford? Because he’s been a great success?? He’s a good QB, but is far from a demonstrated star so far.
Yes, Ponder is not Peyton. But he might be Rodgers. And Luck might be Ryan Leaf.
The point isn’t which would you rather have. The question is having one, can you justify foregoing your other needs to gamble on the other.
There’s just no such thing as a cant’ miss franchise QB.
that's my story, i'm sticking to it!
i would take bradford over ponder any day of the week. he has a higher ceiling and a better skill set than ponder. if they were in the same draft, bradford would go in front of ponder every time. nothing against ponder. i mean drew brees turned out great, and he was drafted where ponder was projected to go. and i think ponder could become that type of qb as well, but i think the odds are lower for him to make star impact than a guy like andrew luck.
warcraft, you are my guitar hero !!!
higher Ceiling?
Meaning what exactly? What is Bradford’s ceiling? What is Ponder’s ceiling? What is the difference between the two’s, as far as ceiling’s go. Now, how does that difference average out per game? What is the PER game ceiling of both? Or you know what, ceiling is a high- not real consistent over time so what’s the average or mean? What’s the difference In their week-to-week projected averages over the course of a year? You know what, fuck all of that. Ceilings, means and averages. Let’s talk about wins! Wins!!!
Who wins more Bradford or Ponder. What, 11 guys on the field at all time determine wins? Then break that down for me. Who helps the team more over time as a team player or leader? Who has a better chance to get to the playoffs. Bradford ALMOST did, but… No dice so far so…. Who’s got a better chance to win a super bowl? Who has a higher ceiling? What’s that? Defense win championships? Oh…
How about we just ask the question: who won’t let us down when it matters? Who won’t break our hearts as Viking fans cuz… At this point it doesn’t really matter who has a bigger Johnson of a ceiling. My heart’s broke and I need some loving. Not a quick thill by a hoped-for ceiling of a climax, but just enough excitement and wins that I don’t get let down.
by DelawareBerserker on Sep 26, 2011 5:00 PM CDT via iPhone app up reply actions
i guess that's why bradford was the #1 overall pick, and ponder was the 4th qb taken.
bradford was the number one pick in the draft coming off a season ending injury, while the jimmy “most nfl ready qb” clausen was taken in the second round. the coaches have ponder sitting on the bench and not starting for a reason. just look what happened to clausen.
the bradford-luck comarison is really similar. bradford was touted as the number one draft choice for the 2009 draft, but he stayed in school for another year, got hurt to end his season, and STILL was drafted number one overall. and he was named nfl rookie of the year.
andrew luck was touted as the number one pick of the 2011 draft, but he stayed in school, and is kicking ass with a new head coach, and is touted as the number one pick in next year’s draft, go figure. he is a much better passer than ponder was in college.
warcraft, you are my guitar hero !!!
Play Ponder now
If I’m Frazier I’m making the switch to Ponder asap. Leslie just signed on as head coach and the 1st year is basically a pass (unless you’re the other head coach named Les) and Ponder isn’t going to get better sitting on the bench. There’s nothing McNabb can do at this point in his career that Ponder and/or Webb can’t and in fact they’re probably both better. I’m completely disappointed in Donovan – I thought he’d be better. He looks slow (in his drops and reads) and frankly out of shape. He now looks as big as Daunte Culpepper – who was also 30 lbs or more too heavy at the end of his career. It’s time to move on.
As for Andrew Luck – man if you have a shot at him you don’t think twice. You take him!!! If we play Ponder now, we can help highlight him for a trade next year for more draft picks. Let’s not over-think this one.
So you think McNabb just needs a little motivation?
Yeah, dont’t think so, and I dont’t think for his it a question of just trying harder. But then I also don’t think the terrible second halves have been primarily his fault. He’s been the same guy in both halves, it’s the coaching and the play calling, in my view.
Also, Toby isn’t a “decent backup.” He’s terrible, and I have no idea what Musgrave was thinking on fourth down. You’ve got the toughest runner in the league, who is also one of the fastest. And you’ve got one of the slowest backs in the league, who also goes down on first contact every time. Yeah. Give it to the second guy. Surprise will more than make up for a lack of talent.
Anyway, I hear your David Carr concerns, but he’s now had three weeks on the sidelines, so I think it’s a little hard to say that the short off season hasn’t given Ponder enough time to learn. But eventually they are going to have to make a change, whether that’s Ponder or Webb, just to give us a reason to watch.
The only reason to put in Ponder
Is to give him experience and help him adjust to the “speed of the game”. We won’t get in the playoffs and it’s a down year so that’s the only positive. He gets experience with a faster-paced game.
Negatives? The game is faster than it should be. Our line has too many holes and Ponder will get hit faster and more often than his collegiate experience.
Positives? When we draft a franchise LT with our first pick next year the game wont just slow down to the normal “fast-pace” game for Ponder. It’ll be like it’s constantly on a slow-mo replay for him. He’ll be clicking with Rudolph, Jenkins, Harvin… Namely everyone except he who should not be named- who’s initials are Bernard berrian.
Overall Positive? Next year we’ll be young where it matters, and veteran where it matters.
Source notes: didn’t stafford get rocked before they improved their line this offseason? Oh he got rocked this past week? But he still got the ball out when it counted? Wonder where he picked up them learnings!
by DelawareBerserker on Sep 26, 2011 5:10 PM CDT via iPhone app reply actions
I'm putting my trust in Leslie Frasier
If the head coach and his staff don’t feel that Ponder is ready to start then they must have a good reason for thinking that way. If Tony Dungy trusts Leslie Frasier then so do I.
I think this is the level-headed approach.
Even in this era where Dalton and Newton are doing fairly well thus far as rookies, I think the vast majority of rookie QB’s would benefit from some time on the sidelines. I still think the Vikings will get some things sorted out; the stuff that’s been happening in the 0-3 start simply isn’t going to continue forever, and I think it’s best to keep Ponder on the sideline at least until that happens.
As a complete aside, I always thought Tarkenton was a Giant first. I’m old enough to remember him playing for the Vikings in the 70’s and I knew he was a Giant before then, but the fact that he was a Viking before he ever went to New York is something I completely missed.
"fortunate, but also lucky"
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Sep 26, 2011 7:35 PM CDT reply actions
Tark was one of the Vikings' first draft picks
Was the Vikings’ third-round pick out of Georgia in ‘61. In fact, in the Vikings’ first-ever game, he came off of the bench and hung five touchdowns (four passing, one rushing) on the Bears in a blowout victory.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/196109170min.htm
Still the only QB in NFL history to throw for four TDs in his NFL debut.
He got traded to the Giants before the 1967 season, and got traded back to Minnesota before the 1972 season.
SBNation Minnesota - For the greatest sports fans in the world.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be—or to be indistinguishable from—self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time." - Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
Follow @DailyNorsemanSB
Follow @SBNMinnesota
by Christopher Gates on Sep 26, 2011 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions
What did they get for him when they dealt him to New York?
I suppose I can look that up myself…
"fortunate, but also lucky"
by Ted Simmons Speed Camp on Sep 27, 2011 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions

by 























