Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Non-Playoff Selections In 2012 NFL Draft Set

Thanks to our friends at Stampede Blue for getting to this first.

The top 18 picks in the 2012 National Football League Draft are all set. To borrow an old line from Steven Wright, it doesn't look something like this. . .it looks exactly like this.

1) Indianapolis Colts (2-14)
2) St. Louis Rams (2-14)
3) Minnesota Vikings (3-13)
4) Cleveland Browns (4-12)
5) Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-12)
6) Washington Redskins (5-11)
7) Jacksonville Jaguars (5-11)
8/9) Carolina Panthers (6-10)*
8/9) Miami Dolphins (6-10)*
10) Buffalo Bills (6-10)
11/12) Seattle Seahawks (7-9)**
11/12) Kansas City Chiefs (7-9)**
13) Arizona Cardinals (8-8)
14) Dallas Cowboys (8-8)
15) Philadelphia Eagles (8-8)
16) New York Jets (8-8)
17) Oakland Raiders (8-8) (This pick will go to the Cincinnati Bengals as part of the Carson Palmer trade)
18) San Diego Chargers (8-8)
19) Chicago Bears (8-8)
20) Tennessee Titans (9-7)

* - Pick will be decided by a coin flip between Carolina and Miami
** - Pick will be decided by a coin flip between Arizona and Kansas City

Picks 21 through 32 are based on playoff seedings. The four teams that lose in the wild card round will select 21-24, the four teams that lose in the divisional round select 25-28, the two teams that lose in the conference championship games pick at 29 and 30, the Super Bowl loser selects at 31, and the Super Bowl winner picks 32nd. Of those teams in the playoffs, two of them are playing for the draft positioning of other teams, however. . .the New Orleans Saints' first-round pick goes to the New England Patriots, and the Atlanta Falcons' first-round choice this year belongs to the Cleveland Browns.

Two main scenarios I see for the Vikings at this point?

1) Andrew Luck goes #1 to. . .well, somebody (probably Indianapolis), Matt Kalil goes #2 to St. Louis, and the Vikings auction off the third pick to whoever wants to move up and draft Robert Griffin III
2) Luck goes first, someone else trades up to St. Louis' spot to take Griffin III, and the Vikings take Kalil to plug into the left tackle spot for the next decade

Personally, I'd be happy with either one. . .but there's going to be plenty of time to talk about that.

Comment 73 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

At least we got the third pick.

One positive thing to take away from this clusterfuck of a season.

Excuse my language.

by SirGrizzly on Jan 1, 2012 7:08 PM CST reply actions  

Uh,

I thought you simply misspelled clusterflop.

by Lars in SLP on Jan 1, 2012 7:25 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

is there

such a thing as a mongolian clusterflop? Because IMHO that is what this season was, if there is such a thing.

Try to learn from others mistakes because there just is not enough time in this world to make them all your self

by montana vikes fan on Jan 2, 2012 8:02 AM CST up reply actions  

no excuse needed

that is exactly what this season was, and thank you for pointing that out lol

dfewkes15

by dfewkes15 on Jan 1, 2012 10:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Great position

Vikes could be in best possible spot.

Don't you know who the *^$% I am?

by Jeppernaut on Jan 1, 2012 7:08 PM CST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Is Kalil a lock for St. Louis if they draft with their #2 pick?

by NWOntario on Jan 1, 2012 7:13 PM CST reply actions  

I don't thjnk so.

I think the Rams have drafted 2 OT’s in the last couple years.

by chaosg on Jan 1, 2012 7:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah...

Rodger Saffold was their second-round pick last year. The player drafted immediately after him? Chris freaking Cook.

by NWOntario on Jan 1, 2012 7:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Morris Caiborne

I have seen several sites where they say St. Louis will draft him but it’s all speculation. I hope if Kalil is available we take him. I like the Idea of trading the pick for more picks too.

by Brent P on Jan 1, 2012 10:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Picture this

Vikings trade pick to either Jets or 49ers for offensive lineman and pick Michael Floyd with the later pick in the 1st round

by MNVIKS13 on Jan 1, 2012 7:16 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

Redskins trade to leap ahead of the Browns to take RGIII. I’d take that deal all day.

by cyberuck on Jan 1, 2012 7:28 PM CST reply actions  

Dan Snyder might give us five first-rounders for that pick.

No, really. He might.

by NWOntario on Jan 1, 2012 7:40 PM CST up reply actions  

It's official

Now that everything is complete, it can plainly be seen that McNabb finished with better stats than Ponder. Go ahead, look it up. Try to find one stat Ponder finished better in.

Not completion percentage. Not TD/INT ratio. Not yards/game. Not yards/attempt. Not yards/rush. NOT A ONE!!!

So before you go lamenting the failings of McNabb, be ready for the eat crow. You’ll be begging for a QB like him next year.

by Jayrome007 on Jan 2, 2012 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

NOT A ONE?

Ummm… Why’d you mention Yards/ rush? CP’s 7.8 is greater than McNabb’s 4.2. so that’s “a one”

Also. McNabb threw for 4 TDs in 6 starts. Versus 13 in 10.

I get what you’re trying to say. And it’s potentially a valid point. but maybe next time try for the lay up instead of the backflip slam dunk argument that misses the net.

by McCoubs on Jan 2, 2012 11:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Lol
but maybe next time try for the lay up instead of the backflip slam dunk argument that misses the net.

I couldn’t have said it better myself

by Murgo on Jan 2, 2012 12:27 PM CST up reply actions  

you are a moron, a fucking moron

I can throw a 15 yard pass straight into the ground, i guess i’ll be in camp next year also. I would have loved for Ponder to sit and learn for a year or two. But, a rookie or a second year guy were better options than McNabb. Everyone was hoping for the Mcnabb of 10 years ago but instead we got a guy whose career is OVER and whose attitude has gotten worse with age. And that is saying alot because he has always been an asshole. The guy doesn’t realize it whatsoever. He couldn’t even stay on the sidelines to help Ponder with the knowledge he has gathered through his career. When he was finally cut, nobody…NOBODY…wanted anything to do with him. And that is with several teams losing starters. Did Mcnabb Give the $5000 to Kluwe’s charity which was there agreement for Kluwe giving up his #5? NOPE. He also lead the team in other stats; flops, balls thrown into the ground within 7 yards of the los…Ponder lead the team in most PERTINENT categories. WE get it…you have some kind of unusal man crush on McNabb, you probably have a McNabb jersey from allof his stops. OH…I feel better now!!

by bigjohn53 on Jan 2, 2012 12:02 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't love McNabb

I just severely hate Ponder. Have since the moment we drafted him and am loving the justification of my hatred he’s proven so far.

Is it feasible he’ll get better? Maybe. But come shove my face in it when he does. Cause right now, I feel I’ve got a much stronger case than those who are so adamantly in favor of him.

by Jayrome007 on Jan 3, 2012 5:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Harvin

We treat him like he’s elite. Yet the dude has never been higher than 21st (this year) in total receiving yards.

In a league that (technically) has 64 starting players at the position, that puts him as the top 33%. Not exactly rarefied air.

And don’t start with the rushing BS. He’s a receiver. He should be receiving. We have RBs to accumulate rushing stats.

by Jayrome007 on Jan 3, 2012 5:19 AM CST up reply actions  

well, he ranked 6th in receptions this year...

…behind Welker, RWhite, Megatron, and TEs Gronk and Graham. not bad company, all things considered — i mean, as you pointed out…

He’s a receiver.
…and receivers need to, ya know, catch the ball…

"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."

Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.

by rj-b on Jan 3, 2012 10:17 AM CST up reply actions  

and other than AP

he pretty much carried this team on offense especially in the second half of the season and no one is saying he’s is a top 5 receiver. but he is a VERY important player on this team and Play maker. you look at stats and that’s fine but stats aren’t everything. dude make plays you can’t deny that. Oh and that rushing BS as you call it, that’s how he was used in college that’s how we are using him in the NFL. No on else seems to have a problem with that.

"Never take your eyes off of your opponent…even when you bow."

by Vikant on Jan 3, 2012 10:42 AM CST up reply actions  

We have lots of holes to fill.

So that #3 pick should be sold to the bidder with the best offer of talent and/or picks.
IMHO.

by Lars in SLP on Jan 1, 2012 7:28 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

So who are people's prime candidates for trading up?

I’m thinking any of Wash, Miami, and KC trading up to grab RG3 or who ever’s still on the board at pick 3.

by Amrius on Jan 1, 2012 8:10 PM CST reply actions  

didn't see your comment until now...

…after i already posted. agree with Wash and Miami as the likely candidates.

"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."

Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.

by rj-b on Jan 1, 2012 9:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I wouldn't count out KC either

There’s almost no way they’re happy with just Orton

by Amrius on Jan 1, 2012 9:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Or Cleveland

They have 2 first rounders #5 and #17, and they need a QB, and their Coach already has been talking about RGIII.

by nmvikesfan on Jan 1, 2012 9:23 PM CST up reply actions  

a few thoughts

i think clevelands other first rounder is #25. this is going to be one of the craziest periods leading up to the draft. in reality indy could trade their pick, st louis could trade their pick. we won’t know what is going to happen until the 2nd pick is announced. suppose indy takes luck, half the people say st louis is going to take blackmon and the other half say kalil. If they trade out, that team will take RG111 and that will leave us kalil, YAY. If the take blackmon, we take kalil, YAY. if they take kalil then we can either take claiborne, YAY…or trade to the highest bidder…i think that can be cleveland with the two number ones and maybe a 2nd or 3rd. we will get extra picks and still are able to get claiborne. cleveland has to trade up to get RG111 otherwise possibly wash or miami or maybe seattle will deal with us. but i like clevelands 2 first rounders this year. if we end up trading with washington snyder may just give us the moon and the stars…plus there spot isn’t a bad place to get riley reiff. plus we’ll get probably a first next year and extra 2nd and maybe 3rd this year. extremely good right tackle and guards can be gotten in those rounds. i say draft an entire offensive line right now. WR such as bowe or someone in free agency. those minutes after st louis decides what they are going to do are going to be intense!!

by bigjohn53 on Jan 2, 2012 9:09 PM CST up reply actions  

The 2nd of Clevelands picks can be as low as #23

All depending on what ATL does in the playoffs. After watching the Fiesta Bowl tonight I would rather draft Johnathan Martin LT than Reiff, Martin separated himself by far. He trimmed downed a little bit and was very fluid and still dominate in the run game. Clevelands right behind us in order so we won’t be able to get a whole extra from them.

by nmvikesfan on Jan 3, 2012 2:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Cleveland has the 4th pick

dang, looks like they’re not going to be a trading partner with us in the draft. Was really hoping we could take both their first round picks in this draft.

by mattnmics on Jan 1, 2012 8:29 PM CST reply actions  

as was i

most likely trade down candidate now becomes Washington (6) or Miami (8/9) for RG3, assuming his stock doesn’t take a hit going forward. moving up to 3 would cost either team their 2nd rd pick + more. highest bidder, yes??

of course, if Kalil is still there, it’s a no-brainer.

"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."

Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.

by rj-b on Jan 1, 2012 9:07 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree...

I think we could get a lot for the #3 pick if it goes Luck Kalil, but I would rather have St. L trade their #2 pick to the highest bidder, that said highest bidder takes RGIII, and we take Matt Kalil. Don’t get fancy, just get the LT that this team needs. Kalil is the best LT prospect in the past 5 or so years too. He’s be HUGE for this team.

by mak07 on Jan 1, 2012 9:10 PM CST up reply actions  

I was hoping that too

Looks like the best we can hope for if we are to trade back is maybe the other teams 1st and second and maybe an extra 1st next year.

by reebs on Jan 1, 2012 9:11 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

the nice thing about it though

is that teams will want to jump ahead of Cleve if they think Holmgren wants RG3.

"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen

by NMVike on Jan 1, 2012 9:13 PM CST up reply actions  

We could still trade with Cleveland and take their 2nd round pick

And draft Claiborne, and then take two O-linemen in the 2nd, but if we could get someone else to jump over them we could get more draft picks.

by nmvikesfan on Jan 1, 2012 9:31 PM CST up reply actions  

true

But can’t imagine they would trade to move up one spot. Maybe we draft RG3 and trade with them the way NYG and SD did a few years ago.

"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen

by NMVike on Jan 1, 2012 9:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Exactly what I was thinking

Cleveland wont hesitate to draft RG3 which means the 3rd overall pick becomes very valuable.

by christian220896 on Jan 1, 2012 10:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Don't rule them out

I want to trade the pick and would not rule out Cleveland. Although they know we are not taking RG3, they also know we will be looking to trade. So depending on how badly they want RG3, they may want to move up just to lock out Washington or Miami.

by llajoy on Jan 2, 2012 8:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Not so fast

There have been several instances in the past few years where teams have traded up 1 spot for no other reason than to keep another team from doing so. If the Vikings make it clear that they are fielding offers, the Browns might get spooked and offer up the 2 first rounders…

by Icedover on Jan 2, 2012 6:29 PM CST up reply actions  

it all depends...

…on how much cleveland wants RG111…if he is there at the 3 hole…there are going to be up to 5 suitors for the pick. up front cleveland has a lot to offer. but like i said everything depends on how much a team wants that player.we would get extra picks plus the player we were going to pick anyways. as for cleveland it’s the threat of someone jumping in front of them as the reason they would have to trade with us. no matter what were are going to get a stud. i think the value of the draft is going to lay in the 2nd thru 5th rounds.
anyone have thoughts on the qb from OKST, brandon weeden?? looks real good for a potential 4th or 5th rounder…but he will be 29 years old.

by bigjohn53 on Jan 3, 2012 3:40 AM CST up reply actions  

Lest anyone think that WE need a quarterback

Here are the rookie season stat lines for two Vikings’ rookie quarterbacks.

Quarterback A – 10 starts (2 wins, 8 losses), 158 completions, 291 attempts (54.3%), 1,853 yards, 13 TD, 13 INT, 70.1 passer rating

Quarterback B – 10 starts (2 wins, 8 losses), 157 completions, 280 attempts (56.1%), 1,997 yards, 18 TD, 17 INT, 74.7 passer rating

One of those two quarterbacks is the guy we took in the last draft to be the quarterback of the future.
The other one is the greatest quarterback in the history of the Minnesota Vikings franchise, and held a ton of NFL records for a very long time.

Tough to tell the difference, eh?

SBNation Minnesota - For the greatest sports fans in the world.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
"Don't do anything by half. If you love someone, love them with all your soul. When you go to work, work your ass off. When you hate someone, hate them until it hurts." - Henry Rollins

by Christopher Gates on Jan 1, 2012 9:22 PM CST reply actions  

Ponder can only be credited with one win IMO

Webb did most of the work vs Washington. Plus Ponder is not playing with the Purple People Eaters on defense.

"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen

by NMVike on Jan 1, 2012 9:40 PM CST up reply actions  

In 1961

Neither was Fran Tarkenton

SBNation Minnesota - For the greatest sports fans in the world.
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
"Don't do anything by half. If you love someone, love them with all your soul. When you go to work, work your ass off. When you hate someone, hate them until it hurts." - Henry Rollins

by Christopher Gates on Jan 1, 2012 9:45 PM CST up reply actions  

true

Here’s to hoping the Vikings defense and Ponder can improve over the next few years so this franchise can return to glory.

"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen

by NMVike on Jan 1, 2012 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

How about

if the Vikes take RG3 and trade Ponder, and keep Webb, I’m more sold on Webb than Ponder. Or maybe trade Ponder, keep Webb and pick a back up QB later.

by maggnuss on Jan 1, 2012 9:27 PM CST reply actions  

Won't get much for ponder

Id rather give him a full offseason to see what he can do next year.

by reebs on Jan 1, 2012 10:36 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

The Vikings are not going to trade CP or draft a QB...

The Vikings need to improve in so many areas. I’m all for drafting to fill the other needs (OL and DB) and if Ponder doesn’t work out at least we will continue getting high draft picks for the next two years (which is at least how long it will take to fill those holes regardless of who is under center). Like it or not the Vikes locked in their direction at QB when they took Ponder, like it or not that is our direction – and in fairness Christian has been without an OL or any WR other than Harvin so at this point I do not think judging him by record is a good assessment. He has made mistakes but we all expected a rookie QB to make mistakes, and he has also shown great poise. He showed me enough positives to think he might develop into a good QB in this league, I am content to give him a full offseason, a full preseason, an improved OL and hopefully adding a legit WR with whom he can develop chemistry…then we will know what we have in CP (a year or maybe two from now). This talk of drafting and keeping another QB or trading CP at this point is unrealistic.

by aceinthecorner on Jan 2, 2012 10:20 AM CST up reply actions  

drafting problems

Unfortunately the way things have been going here in viking land, I can see us screwing up a draft day trade like we did when we couln’t finish a trade. I can’t remeber what year but our draft clock expired, and then teams were rushing to the podium. With all that has gone wrong this year it could happen.

by davebolt on Jan 1, 2012 9:33 PM CST reply actions  

2003 failed trade with Baltimore

We still drafted the player we wanted, KWill and I think he turned out alright.

by nmvikesfan on Jan 2, 2012 2:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Cowgirls

are making this a game in the Meadowlands!

Build up your weaknesses until they become your strong points." --Knute Rockne

by abba7 on Jan 1, 2012 10:00 PM CST reply actions  

?

Did we give up a pick in this years draft for Caleb King in last years supplemental draft?

by NorthPoleNorseman on Jan 1, 2012 10:16 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

No he was an undrafted free agent

"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen

by NMVike on Jan 1, 2012 10:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Is it just me

or did all of the fanposts just disappear?

by Anonmon115 on Jan 1, 2012 10:28 PM CST reply actions  

I personally don't think Zebrie is worth a 2nd round pick

I’ve watched every game of his in person and he is good for two penalties a game and really isn’t that amazing of a college tackle. I know a lot of people are high on him, but I think he’s a bit overrated.

by mn nole on Jan 1, 2012 10:46 PM CST up reply actions  

He would be a right tackle not a left tackle

He is good on the right side but started having more problems moving across the line to help with injuries

by fsu1510 on Jan 2, 2012 4:12 PM CST up reply actions  

agreed

no interest in him — but sadly, he may be a step up from Loadholt…

"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."

Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.

by rj-b on Jan 2, 2012 10:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Loadholt

does anyone have an opinion on loadholt moving to guard?? seems like that would be his natural position…(he has a body like Pat Williams, hmmm NT????)

by bigjohn53 on Jan 3, 2012 3:45 AM CST up reply actions  

been hashed out numerous times

at 6’8" he’s too tall to be an interior lineman, unless your QB is Wilt Chaimberlain….

I’d like to see him tried out at NT next to Kwill….

by michiganpat on Jan 3, 2012 6:42 AM CST up reply actions  

Loadholt isn't quick enough to be moved inside, either

"Th_r_'s n_ h_p_ f_r _ssh_l_ f_ckw_ts."

Can I buy a vowel...?? +1, Kluwe.

by rj-b on Jan 3, 2012 10:02 AM CST up reply actions  

wow

I had the same thought today with those draft scenarios. I actually just used the same scenarios in a comment i made on twincities.com

dfewkes15

by dfewkes15 on Jan 1, 2012 10:58 PM CST reply actions  

Luck

Perhaps they trade spots with Indy (assuming they’ll make another run with Manning) and throw them Ponder to sit behind Manning and learn.

Vikings take Luck. Everyone’s happy.

Then the Vikings move to LA.

Gotta love politicians.

by mishary on Jan 2, 2012 2:29 PM CST reply actions  

I Know we have bigger needs...

But boy I would love some Justin Blackmon in this roster…
What a BEAST of a player

by FernandoMamute on Jan 3, 2012 6:32 PM CST reply actions  

We're boned.

Unless we can land a sure-fire thing in Kalil, I’ll bet money that if we trade away our 3rd pick we’ll just end up with a lot less talent in the long run. More bodies but less talent. Sigh. :(

Stupid Vikings. \:(

by Wytefang on Jan 3, 2012 6:47 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

DN strives to be the best blog about the Minnesota Vikings on the internet, doing so with a unique blend of insight and analysis, as well as (hopefully) wit and humor. We hope you enjoy the site, and make it your home for Minnesota Vikings info!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
You Can Breathe Slightly Easier
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Secondary
Russian_arms_control_small
Season in Review: Chris Cook's Best and Worst performances in 2011
Biggun_small
1st New Vikes Stadium Image

Recent FanPosts

Jg_small
UBVs Special| Trivia! Can you name the Minnesota Vikings Starting QBs?
Small
Roster Analysis: Quarterbacks
Biggun_small
SUCK IT MARTY! - Stadium Passes MPLS 7-6
Imagescaj02y87_small
We get NO RESPECT!
Small
Supplemental Draft and our Safety Situation
Small
Vikings Roster Analysis: Receivers and Tight ends
Grover_small
Purple Kool Aid - Oh Ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Photo_10_small
Percy Harvin and the 2012-13 Passing Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triangle Of Authority

Dailynorseman_small Christopher Gates

Ted_logo_small Ted Glover

Victory__small Eric J. Thompson

Assistant Coaches

Minnesota-vikings-logo_small MarkSP18

Wiggy_7_small Skol Girl

Headshot_small KJSegall