Rick Spielman's Draft History
DCPurple did a hell of a lot of research for this post, from the looks of things. It deserves to be noticed. - Chris
I've wanted to take a closer look at Rick Spielman's actual record with the Vikings, so I ran the figures and thought you folks might be interested in what I've found. He may not be fully responsible, but as Personnel Director, he certainly had a piece of it.
I've looked at it before but only for something specific, and as you all know, when you look for something, you're probably going to find it. This time, I'm trying to look over the whole thing. The data is primarily drawn from www.wikipedia.org, www.vikings.com, and www.nfl.com . Some of it was, frankly, a surprise to me. It's probably not 100% complete, either, there's some gaps that I can see and it doesn't cover walk-on talent at all. Spielman probably had some input even with the walk-ons, and with re-signings, and the few trades, because if nothing else, as ‘Personnel Director', he had to be involved with figuring out salary offerings, just as I expect that all of the coaches had some input or recommendations on draft choices. I understand why they tried to do this ‘by committee', but having an ultimately accountable person is critical for any organization.
I'm not going to claim that it's entirely objective. I have my opinions about the RESULTS of his choices, (and SBN ate my pretty color coded ratings, lol), and my summary is also subjective. But the data is there, you be the judge. I consider a 1st string position to be a successful pick in most cases (100% success), 2nd string is ok (50% success), 3rd string is a fail (25% success), as are any picks that are gone now (0% success).
Spielman's Draft History
In May of 2006, Spielman replaced Fran Foley. That means he had nothing to do with the 2006 draft, so he's not on the hook for T-Jack, Ryan Cook or Greg Blue, but neither does he get credit for Greenway, Griffin, or Edwards.
Therefore, I'm picking up the trail in 2007.
|
2007 |
|||||
|
Round |
Name |
Pos |
College |
Notes |
Today |
|
1 |
Adrian Peterson |
RB |
Oklahoma |
MIN 1st String |
|
|
2 |
Sidney Rice |
WR |
South Carolina |
Lost in Free Agency |
SEA Injured Reserve |
|
3 |
CB |
Fresno State |
Out of NFL |
||
|
4 |
DE |
Texas |
MIN 1st String |
||
|
5 |
WR |
East Carolina |
TB Cut |
||
|
6 |
LB |
Oklahoma |
Out of NFL |
||
|
7 |
QB |
Coastal Carolina |
BUF 2nd String |
||
|
7 |
Chandler Williams |
WR |
Florida International |
KC Cut |
|
AD, Rice, and Robison are all clearly excellent picks. But I took Rice away because he's no longer a Viking and I put part of that on Spielman for, IMO, bungling the contract negotiations. Waiting until the final weeks of a contract before renegotiating it may seem like a great idea for applying leverage, until you do it with a guy who has great options elsewhere. All of the rest are utterly wasted picks, they may as well have been thrown away.
|
2008 |
|||||
|
Round |
Player |
Pos |
College |
Notes |
Today |
|
2 |
S |
Arkansas State |
MIN Injured Reserve |
||
|
5 |
John D Booty |
QB |
USC |
Out of NFL |
|
|
5 |
DT |
Florida State |
MIN 2nd String |
||
|
6 |
C |
Notre Dame |
MIN 1st String |
||
|
6 |
WR |
Jackson State |
ARI Practice Squad |
||
Tyrell Johnson was the Viking's first pick in 2008 because they lost their #1 in the KC trade for Jared Allen. I think that may also be why they stuck with Johnson for so long, he was a huge mistake.
Guion appears to be a solid backup. That's not a bad value for 5th round. I still think Sullivan shouldn't be more than a backup Center, but it is what it is. I'm also still disappointed in Jaymar Johnson; Cris Carter's evaluation of the young man gave me a lot of hopes for him. But here we are, 4 years later, and he still can't crack 3rd string for the Cards.
|
2009 |
|||||
|
Round |
Player |
Pos |
College |
Notes |
Today |
|
1 |
WR |
Florida |
MIN 1st String |
||
|
2 |
OT |
Oklahoma |
MIN 1st String |
||
|
3 |
CB |
Georgia |
MIN 1st String |
||
|
5 |
LB |
South Carolina |
From Redskins |
MIN 2nd String |
|
|
7 |
S |
Ole Miss |
MIN 1st String |
||
This is Spielman's best draft. Every one of them is still on the team, 1st or 2nd string. And that's kind of sad, considering what we're seeing from Load, Asher, and Sanford, despite them being starters.
Brinkley, on the other hand, will likely be a starter next year. Before his injury, he showed that he could perform at a high level.
|
2010 |
|||||
|
Round |
Player |
Pos |
College |
Notes |
Today |
|
2 |
CB |
Virginia |
From Lions |
Listed as "OUT" |
|
|
2 |
RB |
Stanford |
From Texans |
MIN 2nd String |
|
|
4 |
DE |
USC |
From Lions |
MIN 2nd String |
|
|
5 |
OT |
Wake Forest |
MIN Practice Squad |
||
|
5 |
Nathan Triplett |
LB |
Minnesota |
Compensatory pick |
Out of NFL |
|
6 |
QB/WR |
UAB |
MIN 2nd String QB |
||
|
7 |
TE |
Penn State |
From Browns via Lions |
MIN 3rd String |
|
|
7 |
LB |
Rutgers |
MIN 1st String FB |
||
This draft is a mixed bag. Cook was finally turning the corner and beginning to look like a real CB when he got derailed by his off the field antics. When I look at his scouting reports, it shows that he was a real reach in the second round. Also, he was projected more as a Safety, and considering all the red flags he raised with his multiple academic suspensions, it's really not surprising that he's in trouble now. I hope he can turn it around, for the Viking's sake.
DeGeare is stuck on the Practice Squad, despite how pathetic the Vikings O-line is. That tells me all I needed to know about him. Shuler was also a Practice Squad guy BUT the Vikings are now supposed to be a 2-TE set team so 4 TEs is not unreasonable. More, since K-Sauce has retired and Shanko may not return, Shuler's stock is rising.
|
2011 |
|||||
|
Round |
Player |
Pos |
College |
Notes |
Today |
|
1 |
QB |
Florida State |
MIN 1st String |
||
|
2 |
TE |
Notre Dame |
MIN 2rd String |
||
|
4 |
DE |
Iowa |
MIN 2nd String |
||
|
5 |
CB |
Utah |
MIN 2nd String |
||
|
6 |
T |
Arkansas |
From Broncos via Browns |
MIN 2nd String LT |
|
|
6 |
S |
South Florida |
From Browns |
MIN 1st String |
|
|
6 |
C |
Slippery Rock |
MIN 2nd String |
||
|
6 |
LB |
Ohio State |
Compensatory pick |
MIN Cut |
|
|
7 |
DE |
Arizona |
MIN 3rd String |
||
|
7 |
WR |
West Texas A&M |
Compensatory pick |
MIN IR |
|
The 2011 draft is the most difficult to judge, not just because we don't have enough time to see the guys clearly, but also because of the sheer number of injuries the team sustained which propelled some of these guys up to the front of the depth chart before their time.
I don't think Ponder was a reach at all, the man clearly has what it takes and I'm glad he's in Purple. But could the Vikings have done better? We'll be debating that for years to come.
|
Summary |
Success Rate |
|
2 Centers - Both are average-to-mediocre |
50% |
|
4 Corner Backs - 1 worked out |
25% |
|
4 Defensive Ends - 3 worked out |
75% |
|
1 Defensive Tackles - 2nd string |
50% |
|
5 Linebackers - 2 worked out (one was converted to FB) |
40% |
|
3 Offensive Tackles - All are mediocre but 1 is starting |
25% |
|
4 Quarter Backs - 2 worked out |
50% |
|
2 Running Backs - Both worked out |
100% |
|
3 Safetys - All are mediocre, but 2 are starting |
25% |
|
2 Tight Ends - Both worked out, there's a lot of shuffling |
100% |
|
6 Wide Receivers - 2 worked out, but they lost one to SEA |
22% |
And in the end, it comes down to this. One or two great picks that work out are to be expected, even my grandmother could have done as well by reading Mocking the Draft. We expect much better from a professional. And even more from a man in the Viking's organization.
There's no way to be sure that a player will work out, either immediately or 3 years down the road, but scouts, coaches, and GMs look for indications that give them the best shot at drawing the right conclusions. We'll never know how many Peyton Mannings were never drafted or decided to go on to be lawyers instead of quarterbacks. It almost seems like a crap shoot, except... I don't think that's entirely the case. And I'm sure that NFL scouts have access to reams of data and databases and data mining applications that would boggle our minds, when it comes down to assessing players, and they have the eyes of the coaches who bring dozens of years of talent-spotting experience to the table. Bottom line, there's not a lot of excuse for consistent poor performance at the professional level, particularly across the long-term.
Spielman does really well at selecting RBs. 100% so far. But how difficult was it to decide to take Peterson when he miraculously fell to the Vikings? How difficult was it to pick Gerhart from amongst the RBs, the man who many said should have been the Heisman winner? How hard was it to spot Kyle Rudolph, the top-rated TE in the draft? Harvin was another flyer, but there was no question about his talent. Those were all no-brainers, and those are most of his ‘star picks'.
In my mind, the only real question remaining is; how much input control did Spielman have over the past 5 years or so? How much of the fiasco that is the Viking's draft history, actually belongs on Spielman's plate, or was a gift from Chilly and others? That's the question that I think Wilf is answering now, by making Spielman the GM. At this point, it's the only way to be sure. I just wish it wasn't the Viking's who's 2012 draft will be on the craps table.
This FanPost was created by a registered user of The Daily Norseman, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the staff of the site. However, since this is a community, that view is no less important.
179 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting breakdown and a good read DC.
It’s hard to evaluate Spielman when it’s unknown how much input he had in every draft. One thing that I’ve noticed over the years is that his drafts always seem to net a lot of athletic freaks that either work out great or bust. He’s not quite Al Davis crazy when it comes to measurables but I’d say he’s definitely got a weak spot for work-out warriors. Quick breakdown by position.
QB- Ponder, Thigpen, and Webb are all QBs that tested very high in their athletic measurables. Booty, not so much, but he was a fairly mobile type.
RB-Peterson is definitely a freak and Gerhart also tested very high for a bigger back.
WR-Rice and Harvin are clearly unique athletes. Jaymar, Allison, Burton, and Williams were all either burners or physically strong YAC guys.
TE-Rudolph fits the mold while Schuler is more average in the measurables department
OL-All three tackles were physical specimens. Fusco fits this approach with his strength while Sullivan seems to be a rare pick based on intelligence over measurables.
DL-Every one of these picks are high athleticism type players.
DB-Every one of these picks were size or speed picks.
LB-All late round picks that seemed to be project type players. Not sure what to make of this group as they seem to have been picked by the throwing darts at the wall approach: )
Now obviously freakish athleticism is something every NFL team covets but in Spielman’s case it often seems to trump academic/character concerns as well as level of competition and college production. I think this approach leads to his picks being either great or terrible. His hits are always considered great values or steals while his misses seem to be head-scratchers that amateurs like us can easily criticize. If my observation about his style is correct than it kind of explains why his draft picks have been boom or bust, and also why there’s very few picks that fall into that average/solid category.
Basically, his drafts tend to look good on paper as they always have high potential but that potential being realized doesn’t happen as often as I’d like. Not sure how he’ll turn out as a GM, but his style seems like the style of a fan like me that overvalues measurables, rather than the style of a professional that takes all aspects of a player into consideration.
Character issues
One of the things the Vikings have been, IMO, VERY good at doing since the Moss debacle, is handling character issues and mentoring troubled young men, and heading off trouble before it gets out of hand. Huge kudos to the management team on that.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
by DCPurple on Jan 14, 2012 7:05 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Contracts
Keep in mind, Rob Brzezinski was Vice President of Football Operations, and he’s the one who is in charge of contract negotiations. This is only a guess, but in the old Triangle of Authority, I assumed it went like this:
Rick Spielman: identified/evaluated talent, and organized/planned the draft and free agent pickups
Rob Brzezinski: negotiated contracts with draft picks and free agents
Leslie Frazier/Brad Childress: had input on any roster moves
I don’t know that much else has changed, except that Rick Spielman now gets the final say as GM. Rob and Leslie will still give input I’m sure, and Rob is still in charge of contract negotiations, but Spielman has much more authority than he had before and has the ability to override or veto any decisions by anyone beneath him.
So, up to this point, I don’t think you can put the blame of contracts on Spielman.
Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.
to clarify, spielman does not have control of the schemes, coaches or contracts. he is not a real gm,
but a glorified personnel director who in theory is now accountable for poor personnel decisions.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
In other words
mediocre
Joe Mauer grounded into double play, second to shortstop to first, ________ out at second
Remember Chidress had final say on the roster
Speilman negotiated trades, so I would have to add in the Jared Aleen trade which moves the DE grade to %100. Also he traded down in the second round in 2007 and drafted Rice and picked up an extra 4th rd pick, which when picking in the 4th used that pick to trade up and take Robison. We drafted Ev Griffen after swapping picks with Det in the trade down where we took Cook, and later Shuler in 7th. So he has done well in that aspect.
Now he has full control in this draft and we will be able to really see how he drafts and his vision for the team. I can’t give him a draft grade until next year and what he does in rounds 4-7.
Trades
I was starting to work on a similar document covering the trades, personnel changes, but I wasn’t sure if there was much interest in it. Digging up older info is harder for that category and teams go through a helluva lot of personnel acquisitions and releases, some guys only last a couple weeks!
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
ESPN
Has most of the transaction info for a team, including trades. I’ve found this page very useful.
Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.
Research
Yep, that’s actually much more nicely laid out that the transaction histories on the Vikings home page is.
The pain, though, comes in tracking what happened with each player over the years, how they performed after we let them go. There weren’t many actual trades, and if we’re only talking about impact-players, the list narrows quite a bit.
The other issue is that many these guys are often desperation-grabs from the bottom of the barrel to begin with. If a team pulls someone of, say the practice squad of another team, and he turns out to be top quality, that’s a pretty rare nugget of gold. Most teams have good scouts and good enough coaches to evaluate their talent.
Finally, the input of the coaches is going to be a more heavily weighted determining factor in retention of walk-ons and mid-season grabs, because it’s NFL performance-based rather than projection-based evaluation (like a draft pick).
At least, that’s how I’m approaching it. I’ve done a preliminary look and it seemed simple at first… until I realized I was only looking at the ‘impact-players’, like Jared Allen. The ones who worked out.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Right
And then it gets really tricky, really fast. How do you define “impact player”? And where do you draw the line with free agents? Do you look at their contract dollars? I did a similar thing with my fanpost of Spielman a few weeks ago, and it was difficult to decide which players to put on what lists.
Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.
i think you should do that...
I was starting to work on a similar document covering the trades, personnel changes, but I wasn’t sure if there was much interest in it.
absolutely, i think that the draft history only tells a portion of the whole story. trades and free agent acquisition are just as important, especially because we should expect those players to be solid contributors from the get go, where as draft choices are more of a krap shhot and need development in order to be contributors. another part to cover is roster needs and make up. meaning, how well did his choices support the needs of the team and the team strategy, and how much did he ignore the needs of the roster (we were 3-13 this year for a reason).
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Some general managers make an immediate impact in wins
Speilman has not. Nuff said.
by liveforadrenaline on Jan 14, 2012 9:18 PM CST reply actions
Not really
Does Spielman call the plays? Does Spielman coach the players? Does Spielman execute the plays on the field? All Spielman can do is acquire talent, and then it’s really out of his hands.
Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.
Did Spielman, as part of the Triangle of authority
Influence the decision of who Wilf should hire for coaching? Yes.
Does he have responsibility for getting guys with a good work ethic, who want to win, etc.? Yes
In the past, no one really took responsibility complete responsibility for these decisions. Now that Spielman is primarily responsible for everything, it could be a game changer.
My head tells me otherwise, and tells me that Spielman was the weakest link by not insisting to Wilf that if he is part of the triangle of authority, that he should have an equal place in deciding what players to get. Instead, Childress got complete control.
We’ll know by this time next year, and to be brutally honest, I don’t see the Vikings as getting to the elite level with what is going on in management and ownership.
by liveforadrenaline on Jan 15, 2012 11:17 AM CST up reply actions
i agree with your apprehension about spielman, he is not the answer, imo. but to clarify
Now that Spielman is primarily responsible for everything…
he doesn’t really have responsibility for much more than he did as personnel director. he has no authority over who the head coach is, that is the wilfs, he had no authority over who the coaching staff is, that is frazier, he also is not in charge of contracts, that is brez. it soundslike he has a little more authority over personnel decisions, but i get the impression that it is going to be business as usual, as opposed to any real change.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Yeah
It reminds me of the San Francisco situation.
If ever GM’s help make winners out of losers and vice versa, then that team is a good study.
When DeBartolo left, after years of Super Bowl contention, because he was forced out over his casino thingy, and his sister and her hubby took over, the team took an immediate nosedive on wins… maybe partly because they had to cut due to the salary cap but partly because Dr. York was the ultimate penny-pincher, didn’t know the first thing about football, and had no concept of what it took to make a winner.
They went into the wilderness for the last decade+ and didn’t emerge until York gave it up to the son, who was able to get 1) a huge upgrade in coaching (including even Singletary) 2) a winning attitude and 3) the right people on the field.
by liveforadrenaline on Jan 15, 2012 1:26 PM CST up reply actions
Handling Players
Does he have responsibility for getting guys with a good work ethic, who want to win, etc.? Yes
They took a flyer on Peterson, when AD fell from the top spot because of an injury. They took a flyer on Harvin when he tumbled way down the list because of a positive on a pee-test. Both of those worked out.
I hope the situation with Cook also works out, he had red flags too.
But track record shows that Viking management has been able to handle potential problem players. I didn’t much like Chilly as a coach, but he didn’t let any of his players fall through the cracks. Spielman, as Personnel Director, had to be part of that process, and as far as I’m concerned, he gets a big thumbs-up for his handling of potentially troubled young men.
Moss was quickly dumped, but he had a LOT of red flags, a bad history, he was publically stating that the HC needed to be fired (which was true, but you don’t go around saying that to the press or the team owner), and of course, there was the pizzeria incident. He was let go from the Patriots for a reason, he didn’t perform much for the Vikings, and the remainder of his time in the NFL showed that he was done. Dumping him, as painful as it was for all of us, was the right decision.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Thanks for the Great Read DC
Nice job! Gives me somewhat of a depressed feeling after watching the Niners-Saints game. The talent level on those two teams and the coaching level is so far ahead of the Vikes – I just wonder if Spielman is capable of getting us to that level. Hell, Madieu Williams would’ve been our starting safety if we didn’t let him go because of contract & performance. On the Niners he’s a special teamer only and caused a fumble today – one more TO than he caused for us last season.
This is interesting
But I think that if you look at the draft history of most GM’s you would see a similar pattern. It would be interesting to compare his drafts to the others in the NFC north or some of the top teams. I’m not sure how many GM / Personnel directors you’ll find that have great drafts all the time.
Hit Piece
What a disingenuous article. You actually removed Sidney Rice from his credit just because they lost him in free agency? Biased much? And after going into great detail about how you couldn’t grade walk-ons, and free agents because there was no way to judge how much influence Spielman had on those decisions? Total fail on logic there. Secondly, under what rubric do you judge his overall performance? Did you run the exact same calculations of “success” and “failure” on the rest of the GMs across the league and then compare them? And if you do/did, don’t forget to dock them points for losing a top tier talent in free agency! Your methodology wouldn’t pass muster in a grade school science fair. Metrics are useless in a vacuum…didn’t you take even the most remedial mathematics courses in college or even high school for that matter? For the most part I enjoy the articles here, but this is nothing short of a smear campaign. You should have titled your article: “I Hate Spielman.”
I guess this is why vapid political attacks work so well in this country. Give skewed data with no comparative analysis in order to establish a baseline and coat it with just enough sincerity that people believe it as showing ineptitude in the party being attacked. Great. No wonder we have the politicians we have.
For my part, I have no opinion on Spielman’s success or failure. I have no idea what the metrics would look like league wide, so reserve my opinion until I see specific, irrefutable data.
by Byakhee on Jan 14, 2012 9:39 PM CST reply actions 4 recs
OK Mrs. Spielman
He’ll go easier next time.
Don't you know who the *^$% I am?
by Jeppernaut on Jan 14, 2012 10:15 PM CST via mobile up reply actions 3 recs
Nice hit comment on what you perceive to be a hit piece.
I don’t think it was a hit piece. I think he was trying to come up with a way to grade one of the guys who presided over a 3-13 season.
I would give everyone an “F” based on performance, but this article tried to break down EXACTLY where the lapses were in the draft.
It is infinitely better than sitting around and slamming him for doing a bit of work. If he didn’t run a multivariate regression model comparing all people involved across the whole NFL then it is because in this case it simply wasn’t necessary… a simple percentage of success was all it took to identify the areas of weakness.
When he inferred the results as it applied to actual talent then he had some completely valid points.
It wasn’t necessary to provide comparative analysis because no matter who we compare against, we failed this year, and pretty much failed last year, and if you ask me, will fail next year, too.
by liveforadrenaline on Jan 14, 2012 10:20 PM CST up reply actions
not at all so.
this success model has no real meaning unless it is normalized over the whole league. also, the piece totally marginalizes all the success, Peterson, we had a starting Running back rush for 1200 yrds the previous season, RB was not a need, and AP dropped in part because of injury concerns. and while Gerhard was talked about as having should ahve won the Heisman, many experts stated he would have to switch to Full back due to his size at the NFL level. Cook would have been a top Corner this season if he hadn’t gotten into legal trouble. And Rice was a beast of a WR, Removing him because he left in FA was pure biased and as for Harvin being a no brainer? Well about 10-15 GM’s did not agree with this assessment at the time of the draft. and when grading the performance of GM’s it is at the time of the Draft that we must consider, not how we view the players today.
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Jan 15, 2012 10:42 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
Spielman
Byakhee, I gave a qualification in the beginning that my assessments were subjective, based on where the player is now, and, in some cases (notably the O-line and secondary), the quality of the players as they’ve developed.
The standard is the Minnesota Vikings starting line up, and how well they’ve performed.
You’re absolutely right that there’s no way to quantify whether Spielman is better, or worse, than any other GM in the NFL, for two reasons. First, he wasn’t the GM, he was part of a ‘Triangle of Authority’ so full blame, or credit, doesn’t go to him alone. Second, the amount of work it would take to do all the other GM’s draft picks is kinda prohibitive for me. Believe me when I tell you, I considered it.
If you’ve read any of my other comments, you’ll see that one thing I’ve been very consistent about is that the Vikings should never, ever, let any player go unless they have someone better to replace them with. That applies to the front office and coaches, too. I don’t advocate dumping Spielman unless they get someone better lined up.
Same applies to Frazier. You got to have someone better, someone with a proven track record of building not just a winning team, but a winning dynasty.
That being said… I’m not impressed with the track record that the ‘Triangle of Authority’ has produced. A team with such a lop-sided personnel roster as the Vikings have (superstars like Peterson, Harvin, and Allen, on the one hand… and utter crap like Tyrell Johnson and Charlie Johnson, on the other), suggests that what the Vikings had in the past is a total failure. Spielman has been an integral part of that.
Drafting is only half of his track record, though. Trades and acquisitions are also part of what’s worth looking at.
At the end of the day, though, 3-13 speaks for itself. And he owns a share of it.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
byakhee, i think you put your suppository in the wrong hole.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Personal Insults Aside
I do question the way these statistics were assembled and called data. Primarily averaging all draft selections by position rather than by round doesn’t make much sense. Saying his success with receivers = 22% is meaningless when your combining top round picks like Harvin with bottom rounders like Jaymar and Burton. Whenever you take someone after the 5th round and they can contribute in any meaningful way that’s a win. And with the old contact structure missing in the early rounds is far worse than even picking well (or getting lucky) in the later rounds.
What’s hilarious about all this is that in 2009 when the Vikings were winning the dominant opinion on this website was to give Childress all the credit for the Vikings great drafts. Now that we’re losing and Childress is gone those now terrible drafts are somehow Spielman’s fault.
by dwarg on Jan 15, 2012 12:30 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Umm...
missing in the early rounds is far worse than even picking well (or getting lucky) in the later rounds.
Ok that didn’t come out right. I was trying to say that missing in the early rounds meant taking a big salary cap hit. So you get stuck with players like Troy Williamson for a long time because you have to keep paying them even if you cut them. Alternately, finding a starter in the late rounds is a great bonus, but it’s hard to call it anything but luck after all teams have passed on a player multiple times then you sign him and he turns out to be Tom Brady.
There are other examples
Berrian, for instance. He’s been dead weight on the roster for the past two years.
Tyrell Johnson is another.
Yes, those guys sucked, but you can’t get rid of them unless you have someone better to replace them with.
That’s where I have to ask questions about what the heck was going on. It’s not an issue of why poorly performing guys remained, it’s why weren’t they able to find better players in FA or via a trade? You know, like other teams do.
Ever notice how the Vikings seem to go to Division rivals to find talent? Often, it’s a guy who burned them in an in important game that makes an impression. While I understand that these are the talents they see the most of, the NFL/CFL/AFL pool is a lot wider than that; they need to look further out, IMO.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
Berrian is a tricky case in the system though.
Because, the first season he was here, I don’t think you could consider him to be dead weight. He averaged over 20 yards a catch, and we made it to the playoffs in part from his contributions. And he had a good game against N.O. in the playoffs, getting over 100 yards recieving on 9 catches in a game we should have won. Does that make the signing a success?
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 15, 2012 10:33 PM CST up reply actions
Also to consider
at the time we aquired BB gun, we needed help at WR really bad, like much worse then we did this offseason. and BB gun was considered to be the best WR available that year. so we did what the Wilfs like which is to go after the Best player available at a position of need during FA, later it would be Doushmenzada (sp?) who turned us down to go to Seattle. and the critisism of the WR grade is really spot on, first you give no credit for drafting Rice because he left during FA (reducing the grade mightally) and then give equal weight to 6 rounders as you would to a 1st or 2nd rounder. late round picks most often end up on the practice scuad or get cut, most of those that make the team do so as Special teamers. any thing more then that after the 5th round is bonus.
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Jan 15, 2012 10:55 PM CST up reply actions
but they seriously overpaid for berrian in the first place, bad move.
and they expected a number 2 or 3 type receiver to be a number 1.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
And then we would have had...
Absolutely nobody at WR in ’08. Sidney Rice was still getting banged up, Bobby Wade would have been our #2..
I don’t think anyone expected Berrian to be a #1 WR. They simply had to pay him like one to improve the team.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 16, 2012 10:04 PM CST up reply actions
the vikings expected him to be our #1 wr, that's why they paid him that way.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
the point is that our front office (spielman, brez) made that bad move.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Everyone misses in the early rounds. It's random, really.
Some positions are more consistent hits than misses, but when you need quality players in all three phases of the game, you can’t always draft the “can’t miss” positions in the first two rounds. Troy Williamson had the tools to be a good player and he was a position of need. Not everyone works out. I’m much more upset when they trade draft pick(s) for a NFL Veteran that they have a lot of game tape on that is ineffective and unnecessary ala McNabb when you have 2 young players that you need to get on the field.
.. The McNabb deal was kind of necessary
It wound up exploding in our faces, but we needed a veteran QB. Frazier simply felt McNabb gave us the best chance to stay relevant and was.. very much wrong.
But can you imagine having Ponder/Webb in at starter after watching how they played the pre-season? That would have been ugly. We probably would’ve beaten Indy for the #1 pick then.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 16, 2012 1:20 PM CST up reply actions
From a competitive standpoint...
…I guess i’ve just never been a donovan fan. I obviously don’t know, but i’m guessing he was a big locker room letdown when the vikes players found out he was coming to minny. They drafted Ponder because he came from a “NFL” style offense and was supposed to be “NFL” ready. I like christian, and understand if you know that you are going to have a short off-season due to the lockout and can’t get him ready this year, you need to get someone, but there had to be a FA out there that could have provided a stop gap until mid-season that didn’t cost draft picks. I just don’t understand the logic. I’m clearly not football saavy.
There really wasn't any good option.
Hasslebeck was snapped up by the Titans. It left pretty much.. Kerry Collins. Who got outplayed by Painter in Indiannapolis. McNabb would have been available, but it wouldn’t have been until right before the season anyway, so they took him for a low round pick and started to get him ready asap.
I didn’t like the trade either because I didn’t think McNabb would be much good, but I did understand the necessity to it. We were pretty much stupid between shitty player A or shitty player B, and Frazier felt A gave us the best chance to win.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 17, 2012 9:33 PM CST up reply actions
i recall the vikings expressing interest in acquiring mcnabb even before the draft.
i think he would have done a lot better if he would have signed with the vikings and the team had not drafted a qb. this would have meant that it was his job, and that he wasn’t just a temporary baby sitter at the position. musgrave’s mystery offense didn’t help much either and contributed to mcnabb’s early demise. i defend the move to bring in a vet, i think ponder would have totally bombed if he was thrust into a competition for the starting job early, he gets too skittish under pressure, and i think he benefitted by getting the time to get acclimated to the nfl and the system by being a back up and not having the added pressure.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
I tried to post something similer
although with out the vitriol, but the magic, 1 in 12 times, right click to fix a spelling error-redirect to SBN’s home page ate it. but yes, there is no base line to compare Spielmans draft performance to that of other GM’s so we can not say from this analysis weather he was good or bad, at least not in relation to his peers. I agree that it is wrong headed to remove 1st string players that singed else where as FA’s after all, he did still draft them and should get credit for that pick. it is also bad to grade a guy as a failure when he is not a first string due to injury, when he was 1st string prior to injury. just as it is unfair to say that the scale gives a %100 to a guy fro being 1st string, then turn around and give him a 2nd string % because that is what you think he should be? I am not Spielmans biggest fan, I will give him a chance though. again, if we are going to grade Spielman, then we need to have a league avg to grade against.
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Jan 15, 2012 10:29 PM CST up reply actions
grading spielman should not be based only on the draft.
it should also account for the free agents, trades….or more importantly, the lack there of. also, he is/was responsible for assembling a roster of players that filled the needs of the team, and replenished the roster with talent turnover. granted, chilly had say over the final 53, but that is different than who he brings in and how he avoided addressing team/roster needs.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
I think the only thing I disagree with,
would be the assessment of John Sullivan. I really did not think he should be starting for us earlier in the season and about halfway through, I was thoroughly convinced Joe Berger should start in his place, but after the Vikings gave him that extension, I really started paying attention to how he played, and I gotta say, he deserves that extension and the starting spot.
Besides, the Vikings have a history of hitting with 6th round centers. Matt Birk, to this day, is still one of my favorite Vikings. He was my role model, if you will, when I was playing football. I played center because I wanted to be like Matt Birk. I tried to get #78 but my coach wouldn’t let me have it, for some stupid reason.
by SirGrizzly on Jan 14, 2012 10:25 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Sullivan
Like you, I was really unhappy with his play early on, and for a while, I thought Berger or Fusco would be better, and then suddenly he seemed to be holding his own.
So I checked his ranking amongst NFL Centers. Short of coughing up money to ESPN, the closest I’ve been able to find is that Sully is NOT in the top 15 Centers list of the NFL. The Vikings O-line ranked 28th out of 32, so I’m guessing that Sully is ranked somewhere between 16-28.
There were complaints about his size, but he’s 6’4", 301, which is about average size amongst the top-ranked Centers in the NFL. So that isn’t the issue. The Vikings just signed him to a 5-year contract, so he’s not going anywhere as long as he can perform at his current sub-average level.
I’d like to see the Vikings pick up a top-ranked Center at some point. Matty Birk was one of my favourite Vikings too.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
speaking of centers, we could have traded our 12 pick and gotten pouncey and another high pick.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Pretty sure the other Pouncey
is a Guard, rather than a center.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 15, 2012 10:36 PM CST up reply actions
mike pouncey is a center. he was the top rated interior lineman in the draft.
he was an all-american guard in 2009, and moved to center for the 2010 season. then he was drafted as a center by miami and is their starting center.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Pro football focus has him in the pro bowl this year
Nitnthat they are right, but if you want an opinion, that is their’s.
Unaccountable
If the guy was Pro Bowl worthy, why isn’t he at least in the top 10 of ranked NFL centers?
Seriously now. I checked 3 different listings of rankings of NFL Centers from 2011, and he wasn’t in ANY of them.
ESPN’s listing would have tracked him since they track everyone in every listing, but I’m not paying their monthly just to see where they rank him.
I don’t know, man. But based on what I’ve been able to find, and how beat up Ponder got, and how low the Vikings’ O-line is rated… Sullivan doesn’t deserve a Pro Bowl mention.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
In their ranking he is
And I agree he isn’t a pro bowler. But he is a solid starter.
"solid starter" is relative to the horrid state of our current offensive line.
i see some improvement this year, but i doubt his ceiling is very high.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
I remember that at one time
football outsiders ranked Sully in the top 5, but can’t get access to the info with out ponying up some money I don’t have. as for the line’s overall rank, much of that is due to the shear awfulness of our tackle play, and has little to do with our Center. as for your putting Sully in the 16-28 range, that is based purely on speculation that is based purely on bias. the Center was not the problem on our OLine.
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Jan 15, 2012 11:00 PM CST up reply actions
I disagree
with your Sullivan assessment. The guy has improved drastically this year and deserves a little credit for probably being the best lineman on the team (unfortunately).
Rice should definately count, and I think you overestimate the vikes chances at signing him with the agent Rice has.
Gerhart was not the no-brainer choice in the second round. In-fact, one could argue they should have gotten Ben Tate. Also with Rudolph, were you honestly thinking at the time of the draft, Vikings should pick Rudolph, because I know I wasn’t.
All in all, I would love to see an example of a gm that has done better. I would say if there are 10 gms that have had a better performance, then the vikes should get rid of him. I don’t think there is.
I disagree with your Sullivan assessment. The guy has improved drastically this year and deserves a little credit for probably being the best lineman on the team (unfortunately).
Sullivan is a below-average starting Center in the NFL. He’s also a Viking for the next 5 years. There’s nothing to be done but hope he becomes better.
You know… to accept that he’s “improved drastically”, and he’s still not cracked the top 15 Centers in the NFL… wow. I hope he doesn’t have to take that report card home to Momma.
Rice should definately count, and I think you overestimate the vikes chances at signing him with the agent Rice has.Rice counts AGAINST him at this point because the Vikings tried to play the waiting game with the contract. Now, how much of that was the rest of the management team (e.g. Rob Brzezinski) and how much was Spielman, we don’t know. But again, ‘Triange of Authority’, Spielman gets a piece of that.
He gets the kudos, and he gets the tomatoes.
The Rice issue could flip around very quickly. If Rice turns out to be injured 50% of the time over the remainder of his career, then letting him go was the right thing to do. This is one of those things that we can’t know for sure yet.
Gerhart was not the no-brainer choice in the second round. In-fact, one could argue they should have gotten Ben Tate.At that point in the draft, Gerhart was the BPA and the Vikings operated on BPA. It gave us stars like AD and Harvin, but it sacrificed need. Now, if the Vikings had been able to pick up their ‘need’ issues out of FA, all would have been well. But they didn’t. Year after year, we watched FA and expected major moves and aquisitions that simply didn’t happen, and great players went to other teams because the Vikings either didn’t win at the negotiating table, or didn’t even try.
Triangle of Authority, a piece of that goes to Spielman. But a big slice has to go to Chilly as well, and Frazier, because they could have pushed for players to fill the holes they needed filled.
Also with Rudolph, were you honestly thinking at the time of the draft, Vikings should pick Rudolph, because I know I wasn’t.No, I honestly wasn’t. I was pleasantly surprised, because I was well aware that K-Sauce was getting close, and I didn’t realize that Musgrave put an emphasis on 2-TE sets. Those are two personnel considerations which, knowing that, makes Rudy a more obvious choice, if he was available.
The 2011 Draft was the first NFL draft in a while where the team wasn’t drafting on BPA for rounds 1 and 2. It was a much needed change of direction.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
That was interesting... new and improved ways to putz up a response :)
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
You keep saying
that Sully is ranked as a bottom 15 center but never point to where any one actually ranks him thusely. well here is one place that ranks him as one of the best in the league
In the NFC, John Sullivan has pulled a Pro-Bowl caliber season from nowhere in the midst of an awful campaign for the Vikings. A player we at PFF saw as a below average starter eventually destined for the chopping block, Sullivan has been a legitimate force as a run blocker this season. He gradually put some distance between Green Bay Packer Scott Wells as the class of the NFC for 2011. While Ryan Kalil would have been in the discussion as the next best guy behind these two in the NFC, it is a real shame to ignore the season Sullivan has had, especially when it was so unexpected. Kalil can’t be said to be a poor choice, but Sullivan more than deserves a starting spot at the position.
Did our OLine play like crap as a whole? yes, but Sully was not the reason. Johnson and Loadholt couldn’t hold the line against even very bad edge rushers. The only reason Sully doesn’t get much respect at ESPN is because (well 2 reasons) 1. he plays for a MN team, and 2. the MN OLine was not very good as a unit. we had the 2 worst pass protecting tackles in all of the NFL, so yes the Line play was bad, but that is the sole source of the problem. please actually back up your assertions with evidence and stop just repeating unverifiable statements as facts, doing so does not make it so.
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Jan 15, 2012 11:26 PM CST up reply actions
You didn't site your source
That would help your cause.
"A player we at PFF..." that means ProFootballFocus as mentioned above.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
just because your response was all gray, it does not mean it is neutral!
(sullivan) He’s also a Viking for the next 5 years.
we are not stuck with him for 5 years, he has $10 million guaranteed, we can cut or trade him at oly a small loss. I don’t think the vikes had a choice, seeing as the rest of the line is in worse shape. i see that 5 year / 25 million contract as a spot gap, and if he pans out, then it might end up being a reasonable contract. i don’t like settling for a sullivan at center, but given the current circumstances, i think it might have been a smart contract extention.
regarding the rice issue, i think the vikings had insider information on his health situation and probably made the right choice to wait and see how he responded to his surgery. then, his agent went for the bank on his contract extention and left the vikings in a situation where the only way they could keep rice was to pay him more than 5 years/$42 million, which would have really pissed me off. i don’t think he is worth that much even without the hip injury. farve made him successful, other than that, he can be a good playmaker, but the guy had a career threatening injury, much worse than the one adrian sustained.
regarding gerhart, i think that was a terrible pick. nothing against toby, i like him a lot as a player, but we didn’t need a running back in the second round, and i don’t think the bpa argument is a good one. we had/still have needs elsewhere, and “spielman” traded away a third round pick just to move up a few spots to get him. so, losing that pick plus taking a player that didn’t address a glaring need is a double strike against spielman’s decision making, imo.
i totally agree on ther lack of free agent acquisitions, we missed out on several nice players that could have helped the team far more than you can expect any draft pick to do. argggh.
lastly, regarding rudolph, i feel the same way about that pick as i do the gerhart pick. yes he is a talented player, but by taking him, we again ignored glaring needs at other positions. he has a blocking problem, and we could have picked up a sweet free agent to bolster the tight end position, and we then could have used the pick to take a d-back or o-lineman.
i think you can start to judge the 2011 draft for what the vikes didn’t do. and remember, ryan mallet wasselected with our third round pick due to that horrible randy moss fiasco. that roster move set us back even further.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
by krinkle on Jan 15, 2012 12:45 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Re: Gerhart and Rudolph
Not sure what you are arguing. I mean I get that you think it was a bad pick. I have argued that it was a bad pick. But what should the vikings have done instead? You say he didn’t fill a need, but what in your opinion was a team need at that point in the draft? Are you advocating that they should have moved up to select another player? Should they not have moved up and used that 3rd round pick on another player? You don’t address what you would have done with the Rudolph pick either.
I have stated that the Vikes could have stayed with their 3rd round pick in 2010 and drafted Iowa TE Tony Moeaki and drafted a power back such as LaGerret Blunt in the 7th round. That would have allowed the Vikings to use their second rounder in 2011 on another position other than TE. Perhaps a position of need as you suggest. Orlando Franklin or Rahim Moore seemingly both fit that description. I was an advocate for Stefen Wisniewski myself.
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
i would have taken offensive lineman and/or d-backs instead.
and i would have LOVED it if we took lagarette blount.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Such as?
Our 2010 3rd round pick, which was traded to move up for Gerhart, was at the end of the 3rd round. At that point, there was very little value in terms of DB or oline.
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
Huh?
There’s no one who can help after the mid third round?
Not saying that
But I am asking for proof that there was value that is equal or exceeds the value that Gerhart brings to the team at either #62 in the 2nd, or #93 in the 3rd at DB or Oline.
I have already shared my dream scenario: I would have not traded up from #93. I would have stayed at #62, drafted Pat Angerer or Jon Asamoah, and then drafted Tony Moeaki at #93. Then in the 2011 draft, I would not have to draft a TE with #43 if I didnt want to. I could have used that pick on Stefen Wisniewski.
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
we didn't need a running back, we needed o-linemen and d-backs.
and we also gave up another third round pick to move up 11 spots to take the guy we didn’t need.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Drafted in 4th round or later:
DB: # 104: Alterraun Verner
DB: # 135 Dominique Franks
OL: #169 Marshall Newhouse
You can’t say there wasn’t talent left at DB and OL. I think Bruce Campbell will be a pretty good guard for oakland too.
not to mention the several players we could have snagged in the second round.
what his comment is ignoring is that we not only gave up a valuable draft pick, but we did so in order to move up 11 spots to pick a player at a position that we didn’t need, while ignoring the o-line and the d-backs, both of which were very much in need of new good players.
also, it ignores the fact that we did essentially the same thing in 2011 by selecting rudolph and remember that we gave away our 3rd round pick for an over the hill veteran wide receiver (randy moss) who we got nothing out of. it was like the front office wouldn’t dare look at the state of the team and admit that we sucked and needed a re-build, and then decided to just shoot ourselves in the other foot.
that is part of the track record we are working with.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Such as?
That’s all I am asking you to do. Provide a list of players that you would have drafted if you were the GM during the 2010 and 2011 drafts.
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
no, i won't do that for you. look it up yourself.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
How many of those guys have the potential for impact like Gerhart?
Verner is a backup. Newhouse has started some games due to injuries to Clifton. Franks has played well for a 5th rounder. But are you serious about picking Franks in the 3rd? If so, that’s convienient using the power of hindsight.
Bruce Campbell was an OT in college, moved to guard in the pros, and the raiders used a 2nd rounder in 2011 to draft Wisniewski, who is ahead of Campbell on the depth chart. I would have been pissed if the Vikes spent a draft pick on Campbell.
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
THIS!
Stefen Wisniewski
That was my pick as well.
Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!
hindsight...
…is 20/20. I would have traded down and drafted Tom Brady at 198. Besides, TE was a BIG need. Oh,that reminds me, I would also take the Gronk. You can’t count on a 7th rounder to turn out like Blount has.
Blount wasn't even drafted, was he?
I’m pretty sure he was a UFA.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 16, 2012 1:21 PM CST up reply actions
You're Right! He had off field issues.
NMvike said he hoped the vikes would draft Blount in the 7th. That’s what i was referring to. I worded that confusingly in hindsight.
I think you need to redo your metrics.
My problem with your ratings are that you are weighting all rounds of the draft equally.
In my opinion anything after the 3rd round is a pure gamble. So if a player fails in the latter rounds the penalty should be less and if a player succeds then the reward should be greater.
Now the Vikings definitly have a major talent issue at this time. Some of this is due to pure management(losing/not resigning players). Some of this is due to poor draft choices. Some of this is due to injury issues that have happened.
I think the biggest issue with this team has been previous coaching. It is going to take a year or two before the team is back to where we all hope they will be. Right now is not the time for wholesale changes in the running of the organization and of the tcoaching of the team. Knee jerk reactions are what keep teams from being succesful long term and I feel we have had way to much of that.
by Lee Stiles on Jan 15, 2012 12:04 AM CST reply actions 2 recs
Don't you want to know
If your guy gambles well?
Why don't you compare Rick to other GM's?
You go to great lengths finding fault with him. It is almost as if you want to find he’s a bad GM. Give me some examples of other successful GM’s that haven’t ended up with egg on their faces. You’d have to do run downs on ALL 32 teams in the NFL to see what their success ratio is. And what about your own crystal ball, hmmm? What players could you say ‘for certain’ would be a starter from day one in the league?
"Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction." - Old Cowboy proverb.
by TexVike55 on Jan 15, 2012 12:53 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
I don't understand
He knee jerk defensiveness. Why do you feel like he needs defending?
Other than Andrew Luck...
There are no “no brainer” gotta pickem’s in this draft. Therefore, the Vikings should design their draft strategy to pick for need, rather than a best-available-player approach. Trade down to give some team RG3, then use the extra second rounder. Draft an LT, RG, then WR. Simple.
We’ll know if Spielman has a brain in his head by his first three picks.
If he goes defense early, he’s an idiot.
If he doesn’t trade down, he’s an idiot.
If his picks depart from the generally accepted rankings, he’s an idiot.
These days pundits and draft geeks spend all day pouring over stats and videos. Anybody here could do a decent Vikings draft, given The List that every team has. Hell, just copy Mel Kiper’s list. At least then you’ll get an “A” from him.
Speaking of which, when was the last time somebody did a post-draft grade of the pundits? Most of them really blew it on Blaine Gabbert, a guy I thought had lousy footwork. They also missed TJ Yates, who apparently is doing rather well in Texas.
i agree in party with what your saying, except that if the doesn’t trade down and drafts matt kalil at #3 overall, i do not think that makes him an idiot lol
^haha - brilliant edit
- Are you tired of paying full price for robots? -
by U don't have a Kluwe on Jan 15, 2012 1:17 PM CST up reply actions
Why don't the Vikings fire Spielman now
and hire you instead? You seem to know exactly what the team needs are, and who to call an idiot, except yourself, of course. You’re an idiot.
Anybody remember a QB named JaMarcus Russell out of LSU? Drafted No.1 by the Oakland Raiders in 2007. Mel Kiper, Jr. and his hair said he was going to be the next ‘John Elway’. We all know how that turned out. I think he’s flipping burgers in a McDonald’s or living under a bridge right now.
To all potential wannabe GM’s who think they know better:
Tom Brady – drafted in the 6th round – 199th overall in the NFL 2000 draft
Brett Favre – drafted in the 2nd round – 33rd overall in the 1991 draft – 3rd QB taken. The other two taken before him? Dan McGuire, first-round draft pick (16th overall) of the Seattle Seahawks ( spent five underwhelming seasons in the NFL. Now he’s president of a vitamen water company in Reno, Nevada ), and the much ballyhooed Todd Marinovich, the all-American boy and Heisman Trophy candidate out of USC, whose poor play and addiction to drugs limited him to two seasons in the NFL.
Look, gang, THERE’S NO SUCH THING AS A SURE FIRE PICK!!! Everybody got that? Good! Now cut Spielman some slack and take what we get and cross our fingers ’cause any college pick in the draft is nothing more than a crap shoot, ok?
"Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction." - Old Cowboy proverb.
it's much more than just who he has drafted.
it’s just too bad that the wilfs won’t hire a guy and give him real gm responsibilities.
from spielman’s own comments about how much he talks to the wilfs, it sounds like thay are micromanagers and meddlers. maybe someone needs to kick zygi’s ass out of the kitchen.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
agreed.
If you hire someone to do a job, LET HIM DO IT and judge him on his work. You can’t meddle and then when things turn out poorly blame him. Give him a real chance.
i fear that the current arrangement is just more of the same.
except now the team has a fall guy.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
"...any college pick in the draft is nothing more than a crap shoot..."
And this guy calls me an idiot.
If every college player is just a crap shoot, then throw all their names in a hat and pick them at random. Mind if I pick before you? Shouldn’t matter, and I swear my first pick won’t be Andrew Luck…
Heh-heh…
Oh, God...
Look, jimbo, every college pick IN THEIR POSITION is a crap shoot, as I tried to point out in my post about Dan McGuire and Todd Marinovich, although I can see it went right over your pointy little head. You seem to love to call people idiots if they don’t follow your infallible logic, I just thought how you would feel about being hoisted on your own idiotic petard.
Heh-heh… xD
"Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction." - Old Cowboy proverb.
I think its a crap shoot for the teams that don't perform their due dilegence
and thoroughly study every player on their board. It seems pretty straight forward why 2 of the players you referenced (Marinovich and Russel) were drafted by the same team. The Al Davis led raiders have ignored the warning signs for a long time and drafted based primarily on combine numbers and hype. It’s a crap shoot for those guys, but not everyone.
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
True
but anyone can make mistakes. Not every pick for a team will work out as they wish. If that were true, the same teams every year would meet in the playoffs. Teams peak and wane on their ability to acquire talent. It’s just too bad now we’re on the wane side of things. I am hoping for the best from Spielman and Studwell to bring us quality talent to help out where it’s needed the most.
"Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction." - Old Cowboy proverb.
It happens all the time.
1st round selections aren’t always sure-fire. So far, we’ve been lucky. Spielman has hit our 1st rounders on the head (excluding Ponder who the jury is out on.) Peterson, Harvin, Allen (yes, I’m counting him since we gave up our 1st for him.) Not every team can say that they’ve gotten such superstars with their #1 pick.
I think that has more to do with a Spielman success ratio, getting the picks right you’re expected to get right, than anything.
I just wish his 2nd/3rd round selections were as spot-on. The flier picks on fallen-defensive talent in the 4th is working out for us so far though.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 15, 2012 10:40 PM CST up reply actions
But it happens more frequently to the teams that dont do their homework
I don’t buy for a second that the draft is a complete crap shoot. That would diminish the jobs of scouts, GM’s, personnel directors, etc. Yes there is luck involved, but I see that more with the hidden gems late in the draft (Brady, Terrell Davis, Matt Birk, etc.) than I do with the 1st and 2nd rounders.
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
I dunno about that..
I’m not saying its a complete crap-shoot, otherwise 1st rounders wouldn’t be worth much.. but to suggest that all it takes is ‘doing your homework’ to get good players with high selections seems.. wrong.
I’m sure each team does their homework on picks, sometimes they simply don’t work out.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 16, 2012 12:06 AM CST up reply actions
and I'm not saying that every 1st rounder becomes an all pro
I’m just saying that every year there are players drafted high because they had a great combine. Teams will ignore what they say on film and draft a guy because of his measurables. The film wont lie. Also you have to dig into his character and work ethic. If there are too many read flags, I think you have to pass. Especially with certain positions like QB.
There are other factors such as injury and bad coaching that play into this as well. Alex Smith looked like a bust his whole career, but look at him now with a competent coach. Makes you wonder if guys like David Carr would have had a chance if he went to a better team with better coaching.
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
* saw on film
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
David Carr
May have been great with a good o-line and Jim Harbaugh. Look at Alex Smith. Carr’s problem is he was broke mentally from a lack of protection and success. A lesson for vikings: Better coaching and a solid o-line can work miracles!!!
nice post.
I’m Ok with trading a pick(s) for a proven commodity like JA occasionally. You know what you’re getting. Maybe you give up a superstar draft pick,maybe a dud, but who says that you would have picked them or that they would have fluorished in your system.
Hoping for better
Thanks for putting the picks out there. I am hoping that with the Triad Decision Making it will be better.
However I don’t think that the picks where someone is 2nd string is bad. A team needs depth. I would be curious to see how 6-7th picks work out for most teams. I always hear about the stars in the NFL that were 6th round picks but don’t think we hear about the number that don’t make it.
My biggest complaint is they sure seem to miss on defensive backs. Maybe that is because they wait so long to get them but they don’t seem to have a good hit record there.
Triad Decision Making
missed putting in “gone”… I am glad it is gone :)
i'm not convinced it is going to be any different than before.
there is still nobody responsible to set a vision and direction for the team and organization.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Talent of the San Fran Organization
1) The Redskins gave up on Carlos Rogers and he goes to San Francisco and becomes a PRO BOWL player in his first season BECAUSE HE NEEDED GLASSES. Is that really great coaching.
2) I thought the play calling before Half time was HORRENDOUS. Childress Like. The Saints got 3 opportunities to tie the game or take the lead in the final 3 minutes ?
FINALLY, DOES SINGLETARY DESERVE ANY CREDIT FOR TURNING THAT FRANCHISE AROUND?
FINALLY, DOES SINGLETARY DESERVE ANY CREDIT FOR TURNING THAT FRANCHISE AROUND?
in my opinion, no. look what he got out of those players, and look what harbaugh is getting out of them.
they are essentially the same players. i think it shows what good smart coaching can do for a team.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
But he did bring in some of those defensive players.
he’s not an offensive guru by any means, in fact he hates QBs even ’til this day. From what I hear, basically Harbough coddled A Smith to give him confidence and after 7 different systems, Smith found one he could be successful in.
by midnightwonder on Jan 15, 2012 3:46 PM CST up reply actions
Let's not kid ourselves though
That 49’ers team is totally run by the defense. That’s what makes them go.
Part of that is their recent draft class. That rookie LB they have is simply having an amazing season getting to the passer, and the DBs are probably one of the best bunch in the NFL.
What sucks the most, though? Seeing Madieu Williams actually contribute on that defense. Why could he do that for us!? Maybe we do need a new system.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 15, 2012 10:43 PM CST up reply actions
Maybe Madeu
is having success there, because they have no real holes on that D. so he doesn’t need to, or feel the need to play outside his limitations to make up for the horrubleness of every one else on that secondary.
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Jan 15, 2012 11:37 PM CST up reply actions
if the gm brought in some players that's great, but the coach couldn't get them to perform.
that’s the problem. with all the talent on the roster, they were rudderless with singletery. i have heard several niner players recently praise harbaugh as a coach they love playing for, while i recently read that singletary wasn’t commited enough to his position coach job to even attend important pre-game meetings. our own organization is not confident in him. that speaks volumes.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Some people seem to think...
Singletary calling out Vernon Davis lit a fire in Davis and revived his career. Problem with Singletary is he approaches EVERY player the same way. You need to coach each individual differently(to some extent) to suit their personality and get the most out of them. He is NOT a player’s coach.
Good.
I dislike ‘player coaches.’ Coughlin and Bellichick are some of the best coaches in the game today, and they’re certainly not ‘player-coaches.’
On the flip side, the Harbaugh brothers seem to be. Interesting that each division gets a match-up between the two types in the division championship games. We’ll see which wins out.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 17, 2012 9:36 PM CST up reply actions
Good drafting does not equal success
Forbes mag did a great article in 2009 about the best and wort draft teams. Best teams in drafting were: Texans, Seahawks, Broncos. Worst were Patriots and third worst was the Steelers.
The Texans were 22-26 over the 3 years the article examined. So drafting well does not always translate to wins and drafting poorly can be overcome through free agency.
What you see is it is about having the impact players at key positions – QB, WR, TE, OL, DE, Safety.
It not just picking good players, it’s getting the right combination of players. And you really can’t look at just the draft without considering free agency and trades.
This post is a good attempt to quantify one opinion about the draft, it’s only a part of the total picture and by itself, it doesn’t really allow us to draw conclusions.
In addition to comparing to other teams, you might want to compare drafts to W-L records. What is the impact of one great draft followed by three poor ones?
I would just conclude that: Tarkenton, Favre, Brees, Warner, Steve Young, Moon, Cutler, Cunningham – just to name a few QBs who were traded/ free agents and changed teams and went on to have outstanding seasons with a team other than the one that drafted them.
Success comes from a variety of factors. Talent at key positions, careful management of salary cap, quality coaching, environment that attracts good free agents …
by Vikefandc on Jan 15, 2012 11:03 AM CST via mobile reply actions
How did Forbes determine if a team had a good draft class or not??
by vking1 on Jan 15, 2012 11:23 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I was wondering that myself...
If they are claiming the Patriots are the worst drafting team, then I don’t hold much stock in their evaluation. They must be basing the ratings on pre-draft assessments of the players that the Patriots drafted.
We all know how bad of an idea it was to draft Grownkowski in the 2nd and Hernandez in the 4th. Oh, and that Nate Soldier guy sucks too.
Here's where I say that coaching makes all the difference
New England’s Belichick prides himself on taking any young dog and teaching him to do all the tricks in their systems.
Many coaches are great at developing people, and some are good at taking diamonds and turning them into a pile of dog doo-doo…
If you don’t have a system, then people will not be able to live up to their potential.
by liveforadrenaline on Jan 15, 2012 12:21 PM CST up reply actions
Agreed..
You can draft the best players, but if they do not fit your system they are going to be wasted.
Being able to evaluate which players have the talent level and the traits you want to fit your scheme is more important than simply picking the most talented player.
Not if you tweak your system to maximize the talents of your players
Which is supposedly what Bill Musgrave does.
"At this point, what we got to lose, right? So we might as well throw caution to the wind and hit people in the face."
--Vikings DE Jared Allen
He did really well
When he substituted Gerhardt in end sweeps instead of AD ;)
by liveforadrenaline on Jan 15, 2012 1:37 PM CST up reply actions
I think that was more sarcasm
than sincerity. Musgrave clearly doesn’t play to the team’s strengths exclusively.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 16, 2012 10:07 PM CST up reply actions
that was musgrave's statement after getting hired.
but i haven’t heard aor seen anything to back up that statement since.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Good job DC
I think those that criticize and ask why don’t you judge other GMS for a comparison are missing the point. Who gives a rat’s arse about other GMs. We only care about one GM in the league. And if the roster is not up to snuff then the person in charge is responsible.
So compare all you want. It will not matter because the bottom line is 3-13.
But I truly believe that until the 2011 draft, the majority of the responsibility for the draft and roster goes to Brad Childress. I have yet to be convinced by anyone how the person who was given final say over personnel would not have a major influence during the draft. I am all ears and eyes for anyone who wants to somehow put any of the drafts on Spielman prior to 2011. They all belong to Brad Childress. I like Childress as a coach but giving him final say over personnel was a terrible decision.
I have to start judging Spielman starting in 2011. But that is just me.
I have looked at the past drafts since 2006 and did a story last January. It is not what positions the Vikings selected Per se, but who they selected in relation to the rankings that were available at the time. And these rankings were just from websites and guys who cover the draft which have proved to be pretty good in hindsight.
You're forgeting someone...
Scott Studwell, who is our Director of College Scouting. If anyone should be held accountable to who we draft, don’t you think it is him?
"Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction." - Old Cowboy proverb.
It would be good to see who he recommended and why
And see if he was overridden a lot…
by liveforadrenaline on Jan 15, 2012 12:15 PM CST up reply actions
and as fans, those are decisions we will never, ever know.
Ponder. Peterson. Percy. Purple Perfection.
I wish they made their draft boards public information after the draft.
That would be so interesting and give us, as fans, such a clear look at how they are evaluating talent and team need based on their picks from that board.
spielman says..."the ouiji board made me do it"

well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Good job
But I wouldn’t call Asher Allen first string. He’s the dime back if all the personnel is there. That’s fourth on the depth chart. Also Brandon Buryon’s on the practice squad with everyone playing.
DeGeare got starts when Herrera was hurt at year and was terrible, which explains the practice squad.
Overall, I think you are too generous to Spileman, because as you note guys have moved up the depth chart because of Injury. I also think the scores fir drafting Gerhart and Rudolph need to be discounted a little for using a high pick on something they didn’t need when they h holes to fill. Bon are good players, but we probably should not have picked them.
I think we need Rudolph
Because no team is showing great success right now without a catching tight end.
Some are making the argument that he doesn’t block well, but I think that is one of the failures of the Vikings… that they are using their TE’s to block and not to actually get downfield and catch some passes and keep the other team guessing.
by liveforadrenaline on Jan 15, 2012 1:06 PM CST up reply actions
He's a valuable piece
But we had Shianco for this year and a offensive lineman or corner would have helped this year and down the road a lot more.
that's drafting on hindsight
which I think a lot of people are considering when they evaluate Speilman. A great deal of drafting the right person depends on the scheme or system your team is running. The GM is not directly responsible for the system that’s utilized unless he chose the HC and cordinators.
Once he gets the guide lines of type of system, he can begin working on acquiring better personnel to fit that system.
We are just beginning to find a glimpse of the system we might be running for the future.
by midnightwonder on Jan 15, 2012 3:55 PM CST up reply actions
2 things
one, we new going into the draft that we were going to utilize a lot of 2 TE sets in the new Offense. so getting a second TE was a high priority. 2nd, every one new that Kleinsausage was going to retire in 1 or 2 years (he did at the end of this season) and there was much speculation that this might be Shanks’ last season here as well (might be too expensive as a FA). so getting a good young TE in last years draft was really a must. possibly this years too.
as for teh Corner, well, they Drafted Cook last year, and he could have been one of the top Corners this year if he had been able to controle himself better, and Winfield and Griffin was coming back from an injury. the initial reports were good on him. While Griffin did come back healthy, he clearly lost a step, but looking at who was on the roster before teh draft, Corner was not as big a need as getting a pass catching TE and QB.
Will the Real Thor Please Stand Up ... ?
by the Real Thor on Jan 15, 2012 11:50 PM CST up reply actions
It's a must
To draft at a low-cost, readily available position a full season before you might lose your existing guys?
Regardless, that’s some fun revisionist history, but I don’t recall anyone saying TE was a need before the draft.
Instead, they went away from need and got a superior athlete. That’s a defensible deceision on those terms, but it doesn’t make it a need.
Yeah, that was strictly BPA
Thankfully, it seems to have worked out. If we don’t re-sign Shank, we won’t be hurting for a pass-catching TE.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 16, 2012 11:27 AM CST up reply actions
No it isn't
We didn’t need a TE at the time. Anyone paying attention knew we could use an upgrade at RG, CB, S, and DT.
They took him...
…to help Ponder. Protect and give him a big target when pressured. That’s what they said in their post draft. So, why didn’t he play more?
Because they had to keep extra TEs in the formation to block.
THAT is why Rudolph got so little time pass-catching, which is also the reason why Shiancoe kinda disappeared.
The fact that so many of his picks are either starters or immediate backups isn't really reassuring
The performance of the player, not the fact that he’s playing, is what counts. Many of our starters are obviously lousy players and not a whole lot of that is because someone got hurt.
Players are important but so are coaches. Check out the Packers win against the Lions at the end of the season for proof that you don’t have to have high draft picks all over the roster to win. Low round picks and UDFAs had a record breaking game against a team we couldn’t come close to competing with when our best players were on the field.
We’re not going to know how Spielman is at talent evaluation for another 3 years but what will our team look like at that point? People who were in charge for the downturn of the club are now in charge of it’s rebuilding. How could we go wrong?
and it's not just talent evaluation, it's roster evaluation and getting players to fit/fill needs.
so, i think there is a track record to judge him by, it might not be totally clear due to the chilly factor, but chilly did not have cokmplete control of the player selection and acquisition, he had final say on the 53 guys we kept after training camp.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Meaningless...
Unless you also compare Spielman’s performance against other GMs/PDs. How many of the drafts from each round typically end up starters, backups or washouts?
AD, Jared Allen, Percy Harvin and Chris Cook all had major concerns regarding character or injuries. Three massive wins and one miss. That is a trend I am sure we would all love to see repeated!
In my view, we jettisoned Sidney Rice just in time. One good season and he turned prima dona. Hard to measure intangibles like that.
Zygi too fast on the draw
Just saw an article on PFT that the Colts interviewed 8 people for their GM job.
After Zygi fired TICE how many people did he interview for teh head coach - 1
After he hastily extended Chilli he later had to FIRE him
How many people did Zygi interview for the new HC -—— 1
How many people did Zygi interview for the new GM position -—- 1
Zygi is willing to spend the money but not the time it takes to be a good owner.
If RS really is that good what is the harm in comparing him to 5-7 more good candidates, unless of course you might come to realize that some of the other guys might be better.
Exactly. And it started from day 1 when he gave Brad Childress final say over personnel.
Then he hired freaking Fran Foley and let him and Childress ruin the 2006 draft. That was the start of the downfall of the depth on the roster and led Childress to chase many QBs trading away draft picks in the process.
I do not know why it is so hard. Childress is the person responsible for the majority of this roster. Not Spielman. I mean Childress is only a season and a half removed from the team but his fingerprints (i.e. players) are still on the roster. They will have to purge some of the players he selected.
Make no mistake. He was responsible. How can you have final say over personnel and then let someone else run the draft? Somebody please explain that logic to me please?
Quit blaming Spielman for 2006 through 2010. That was all Brad Childress. I know Childress is a good coach but his tenure is a prime example of why you do not let a coach do whatever he wants in terms of personnel when he is hired.
Suppose Frazier is let go after next season. Should Wilf allow a new coach to come in and declare that Ponder is not the answer and now has to go get another QB? And what happens in three years when that coach is possibly gone?
I know coaches like to do that and will only come to teams where they are allowed such leeway but if I am owner I am saying no freaking way.
I can't quit blaming Spielman for a good share of this mess
I see weakness, which doesn’t belong in a football organization. Good for Childress for getting all the power. But rotten for the Vikings that it appears Spielman was so weak as a part of the triad that he stood by or made such a weak case that Wilf handed the complete reigns over to Childress for player personnel.
What you have going on right now is just an extension of this cluster&%$#, and Spielman’s footprint is all over it.
by liveforadrenaline on Jan 16, 2012 10:56 AM CST up reply actions
Quit blaming Spielman for 2006 through 2010. That was all Brad Childress.
wow, that is a blanket statement that has no merit.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
Why?
Care to elaborate? Childress had final say over personnel right?
Since we all know that is true how could Spielman draft players he wanted if Childress did not want them?
Who made the final cuts? Was Spielman involved in those decisions even though he did not have final say?
Plenty of articles were written over the years detailing players Spielman wanted to keep that Childress decided to cut. Like Tyler Thigpen, Donald Penn, and Kyle Cook.
I am willing to listen to reasonable explanations on how Spielman had more say in the makeup of this roster. I just do not see how it is possible.
This last draft showed what Spielman could do if given the chance. This next draft and free agency will show more. He may not do a good enough job and have to be replaced but at least we know who was responsible.
Before the only person I can point to is the man who had final say over personnel.
If this last draft shows what Spielman can do..
then I think we may be in trouble. The issues from ’10 were exactly the same in ’11. If not worse.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 16, 2012 10:09 PM CST up reply actions
All the picks get a pass this year
With no mini camps or OTAs, I really cannot blame rookies on this team for their performances.
You have to consider also that Frazier was under the illusion that this team could compete still. His first two picks could have been different and it would have made a difference this past year most likely. But we would need a QB and may have finished better and could have been picking around 10 if we had just won two more games.
If they had taken Nate Solder OT in the first and Torrey Smith WR in the second then I would think we may have had more success even with McNabb and then Webb. Having a decent offensive tackle would have helped out the offense a lot. Having Smith on the outside would have been that deep threat.
Or they could have gone with Wisniewski or Orlando Franklin and they wouldhave helped the line too.
With different players we would have had different results and probably won a couple of more game at least. I am guessing.
We could still be in trouble but I am OK with letting him do his thing this year and one more after that. Then I will be looking back with a very critical eye.
this is exactly why i won't give spielman a pass this year...
You have to consider also that Frazier was under the illusion that this team could compete still. His first two picks could have been different and it would have made a difference this past year most likely.
he made bad decisions by not addressing obvious critical needs and using the top picks on a reach qb and a te we didn’t really need. not to mention the fact that he gave up our third round pick to get randy moss.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
it's a blanket statement to say "that was all childress".
and it has no merit because you don’t know that. there was a “triangle of authority” set up which included spielman. he was in charge of the draft and scouting. chilly may have had final say on the 53 man roster, but he was not the guy bringing in the players and negotiating their contracts and screwing us up regarding the salary cap and the future of the team and roster. there is plenty of blame to go around.
and, if you think we just “re-labeled” a guy who had, according to you, no responsibility what-so-ever, as the king of the roster, then i am doubly worried. because before he came to the vikings (to do absolutely nothing ;) ), he was the GM of the miami dolphins, where he got pushed out due to his poor decision making.
why are there countless articles over the last 6 years attesting to spielman’s draft philosophy and analyzing “the picks spielman made”? i’m pretty certain that he has had a hand in all of the player acquisition over his tenure as the “vice president of player personnel” and being handed the responsibility for the draft for 6 years.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
You can believe anything you want
I do not see how a person who has final say over the 53 man roster has no input in the draft, the decision to extend a player’s contract (it was Childress who told Ray Edwards he would not be getting the raise he wanted prior to the 2010 season when Ray got the first round tender), and therefore having a major say in who gets paid what.
It does not make any sense at all. Spielman provided the scouting reports and his opinions. Childress probably agreed with him on a lot of the moves too. It is not hard to agree on first and second round picks. Later picks are where it gets tricky.
The bottom line is you have not provided any reasonable explanation of how a person who has final say does not have major input into all things roster related.
Spielman being given full control now is not a reason to worry. He did before in Miami and then he was handcuffed here. Now they removed the handcuffs.
Childress is responsible for the roster up until the middle of 2010. Period.
If he has final say then he gets all the credit. He has left the depth on this team in tatters which we are trying to recover from now.
google "vikings triangle of authority" , you may not have heard of this.
there is no need for you to try to twist away from your statement.
Quit blaming Spielman for 2006 through 2010. That was all Brad Childress.
so, i don’t have to provide you with a reasonable explanation for your strawman.
the fact is that you don’t know that had complete authority over everything related to the roster. that is what i am pointing out to you. but, if you need to over simplify things in order for you to make sense of them, then that is your problem.
the owner of the team set up a committee system with checks and balances to make decisions in the front office. spielman was one of those key committee members that was in charge of college and pro scouting, trades and the draft. that is just a fact.
i am not/never was a fan of this approach, and the results obviously speak for themselves. but to suggest that spielman had nothing to do with the current state of affairs is inaccurate.
for the record, i think we are in just as muxh trouble as before, nothing has really changed very much except a job title and zygi now has a fall guy.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
I am full aware of the TOA
Here is an article that may back up your beliefs …
http://www.profootballweekly.com/2010/11/05/breaking-the-triangle-vikes-disagree-on-moss
I stand by my statement that it was all on Childress especially the futile attempts at getting QBs. Remember that he did not bother to resign Shaun Hill and then traded a draft pick to get Brooks Bollinger. He then drafted TJack in 2006. He picked up Mike McMahon in March of 2006 only to cut him in September. He traded for Kelly Holcomb in August of 2007. He used two picks to move up for John David Booty in 2008. He also signed Gus Frerotte in 2008. In February of 2009, Spielman had finally had enough and acquired Sage Rosenfels. But Childress went out and got Brett Favre in August of 2009.
As I said above, you can believe what you want. Sure there were some moves that Spielman made that Childress may not have had input, but I find that very hard to believe.
When one man has final say then that is where the buck stops.
Maybe I am wrong but I do not believe it. We saw what Spielman could do in this past draft and then free agency. He was handcuffed in free agency because there was not much money to spend.
We shall see how he does this year in free agency and in the draft without having to worry about someone with higher authority cutting the players he selected.
I mean why would he draft someone that Childress did not endorse? Makes no sense to me.
That is what I believe and I will accept the “blanket” statement.
When one man has final say then that is where the buck stops.
but we didn’t have that, and we still don’t .
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
it seems you just want to make some kind of definative statement.
but that is not necessary. the vikings management has been run by a screwed up committee system. if you want to place blame “where the buck stops”, try zygi wilf, he set up the committee.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
We will have to agree to disagree
I know what I believe. I trust in my logic. It may be wrong but I cannot see it any other way.
then you are self limiting.
the facts speak for themselves, you just want to simplify it with an over generalization, for what reason matters not. the owners pay the bills, zygi is the majority owner of the team, the buck with him. also, he is the one who set up the committee system. if you are trying to deny any of that then you are off in the clouds.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
danny loyd?
The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.
What is your point?
I think Zygi Wilf wants his team to be successful. It’s hard to believe Zygi would sabotage his own investment. What would be the motive? I think if Zygi is at fault for anything, it’s not understanding the game of football and not seeking advice from more successful owners on how to proceed with hiring the right top personnel to help with decision making and interviewing. I’m guessing that every candidate goes into an interview and sounds really good. If you can’t decipher who’s better, as an owner, you need to get some good help. Zygi wouldn’t know who’s better of any candidate interviewing for any football job.
yep, i agree, i think he has "dan snyder disease", but his personality is less creepy.
well then who the hell are you talkin' to...are you talkin' to me?
whether good or bad..
I think there is so much pollution from the years past that it really doesnt matter at this point who did or picked what. The Vikes are so lack of talent I would lay odds that this team is one of the worst depleted talent wise that a team has been allowed to get. Some can rip me and lah lah for seeing it. But i would think most here saw the playoffs.
We have had people here post words like “elite” in 2 years. “fill some holes” etc…I think the Vikes need huge overhual as in clean out the FO and start the flip over. How can a guy seriously have a scheme with what we lack? From what some have been reading and posting I dont think good coaches want to touch this team as I weather or not they stay here in mpls or Frazier gets more years on a contract. I think those in the NFL get how far away the Vikes are from any sort of concept. I think blame or rating a performance is all wonderful but at this point its null. Way to much has gone bad over the years that it just kinda sticks to this group like glue under foot. Until they do some real house cleaning we are in for a long ride. The playoffs showed teams that are soundly grounded more so than ever. I just dont see it one guys fault as much as it is just poor managment over all and allowed to go on and on that it breads mediocre on down.
@}-----You've been Touched-----{@
Getting to the party a bit late I guess
And I sure didn’t read all the comments above me (stopped when they started in on the poster and not the ideas) Anyway, I don’t think we’re doing a great job on drafting, but I think we’re doing a worse job on training people up. Pretty much all of our ‘project’ guys bust. This could be because of a couple of things, the coaches inability to improve the play of their players, or the coaching staff not creating plays that emphasize their players strong points.
(there’s my thunks) Thanks for putting this up DC gives us a starting point for discussions on a topic I’m sure most of us are concerned with (even though your stats are all wrong… :D)
The Vikes aren't in a remodeling or reconstruction they are in a burn the place down and start praying they don't mimic the Lions rebuilding process.
There are other metrics to evaluate draft efficiency/general managers, too
Some articles use number of Hall of Famers, number of Super Bowl Appearances, win-loss record, Pro-Bowlers, etc…
by liveforadrenaline on Jan 16, 2012 11:06 AM CST reply actions
The Former High Lord Master Commander Brad Childress
I would imagine had a HUGE hand in draft picking. He was, after all, in final say of the 53 man roster, so if Spielman had had the power and authority to say ‘F U, we’re taking this guy’, Chilly could have gotten right back at him by cutting him. I don’t know if he WOULD have, but it was a stick he easily could have swung in the drafting war room.
In the ToA, by the way I always saw it, Chilly sat supreme for the most part. I’m sure Spielman had his moments- after all, the Rosencopter signing was supposedly 99% his doing (and just went to show how the ToA wasn’t working, because then we had ended up trading/ taking up a lot of money for a guy who turned into our 3rd string QB, in a season where our 2nd string guy I believe played a grand total of 10 minutes).
Of course, this in and of itself turns into a double-edged sword. So, by my logic above, we could forgive Spielman for drafting Tyrell Johnson in the second round. But do we give him credit for the brilliant moves- drafting an injury-prone RB (AP), trading a first rounder for a DUI-prone DE (Jared Allen), drafting a WR with a mary-jane problem (Harvin)?
My optimistic outlook (because, hey, what else can one have now? Dude’s GM) is that Wilf surely knows who had more influence in what, and sees Spielman’s influence more in the positive and less in the negative, and believes that by giving him this power, it will mean more good picks/ moves than bad.
Hopefully.
261 Daily Norseman readers and counting say I am a genius... the masses have spoke!
...and those who voted 'moron' were secretly Packer trolls.
Follow @KJSegall
He's done an ok or better job already
So far, he hasn’t had a 1st round bust (the jury is still out on Ponder). He should have more freedom without Childress around, but those CB busts have happened because the team has chosen a supposedly good fit for a scheme over talent and skill. As long as Frazier is around, there could be more of those.
CB busts?
Marcus McCauley is the only bust in the group that Spielman has drafted.
Asher Allen was a 3rd round pick, and is playing at a level that does not deserve the “bust” moniker. If he was drafted in the 1st round, then he might be creeping up on the “bust” label, but he is not.
Cook is a good talent, and will likely be a stud CB if he can keep his nose clean… IF he can.
I'm counting Griffin and Cook, too
Griffin was never great in the first place. He was known for tackling well, but also for giving up the biggest cushion and getting beat often.
Cook was basically a first round pick, and really, what’s he done? Nothing studly. I reserve that word for DBs who make a splash right away.
Griffin WAS rounding the corner, though
He had his best season in ‘09, when we finally decided "Hey, our CBs are better in press coverage than zone.. let’s run that more." But the ACL in the NFC game kind of ruined his ‘10 season.. and then he hurt the other ACL. I wouldn’t say he’s a bust. He’s just damaged goods now.
The same goes for Cook, who was making good progress this last season before stupidly getting into legal trouble.
by REVENGE4KLUWE on Jan 18, 2012 9:57 AM CST up reply actions
Griffin never put together 2 or more good seasons in 4-5 years.
Yes, Ced was probably having his first good season, but it was too little (the Vikes were never good at defending the pass during the years that he played) too late (good players have their breakout year earlier than that and have at least one other good season by then).
That still does not make him a bust...
Neither does the off the field issues with Cook.
The question is not whether or not he could predict Cook would beat up his girlfriend (allegedly), it was whether or not Spielman was able to determine that Cook had the talent to play at a high level, and I think most would agree that Cook was showing that he could, indeed, play at a high level.
A high level?
How has Cook performed at a high level?
First of all, he has not performed very much at all. He played in 6 games (only 3 GS) last year and 6 games (only 5 GS) the year before. He only beat up his gf in one year, as far as I know, so that doesn’t explain much of his time on the sidelines. I’ll think that he is performing on at least an average starter level when he manages to start 14-16 games in one season, if that ever happens at all.
Next, consider his lack of stats in 12 games played/8 games started. Antoine Winfield actually did play at a high level during those games (he only played in/started 5 games in 2011), and he had some stats to show for it, including a pick. Cook has started for half a season without a pick or forced fumble or fumble recovery and has defended only 6 passes in 12 games/8 starts total. It’s better than nothing, but it is far from performing at a high level, especially given the terrible defensive rankings for the Vikes in the past 2 years. The ball was in play more often than it was for defenders on other teams, but Cook was not dominating or even making an above average number of plays.
Although Cook was officially drafted in the 2nd round, the team had traded down (I guess they knew that nobody else wanted to spend first round money on him, either), so he was basically our first round pick that year. Expectations and performance should be higher for Chris Cook.
and I think most would agree that Cook was showing that he could, indeed, play at a high level.
Didn’t say he did, said that he could.
He only beat up his gf in one year, as far as I know, so that doesn’t explain much of his time on the sidelines
No, that doesn’t. What does explain his time on the sidelines were his meniscus tears. One right after another, which does often happen with that kind of injury due to the player favoring the other leg.
All I have to do to reinforce my stance that Cook was turning out to be a stud CB is to point to the Sept 25th game vs Detroit. He had a great game against Calvin Johnson, though he did give up one TD. I agree he does not have the consistent production that we want out of him, injuries and off the field issues have hampered that.
But if you think he hasn’t lived up to expectations when he is ACTUALLY on the field, then you should take a closer look at the guy.
I didn't mean to directly attribute it to RS
Griffin is relevant because Childress had a lot to do with that draft and selected Ced to fit a scheme rather than for overall talent:
[Spielman] should have more freedom without Childress around, but those CB busts have happened because the team has chosen a supposedly good fit for a scheme over talent and skill. As long as Frazier is around, there could be more of those.

by 





















